Chapter 1
Chapter 1
ANAGEMENT-I
CHAPTER ONE
OVERVIEW OF FINANCIAL MANGEMENT
1. Introduction
To have a good understanding of financial management, you need to understand first what
finance is. Literally, finance means the money used in day-to-day activities of an individual or a
business for exchange of goods and services. But here our focus rather should be to consider
finance as a separate and distinct field of study like accounting, economics, mathematics,
history, geography etc.
Financial management can also be defined as a decision making process concerned with planning
for raising, and utilizing funds in a manner that achieves the goal of a firm.
Financial managers must also be able to use the structure of decision-making provided by
economics.
economics. They must use economic theories as guidelines for their efficient financial
decision making.
making. These theories include pricing theory through the relationships between
demand and supply, return analysis, profit maximization strategies, and marginal analysis.
The last one, particularly, is the primary economic principle used in financial management.
management.
However, the modern or contemporary approach views financial management in a broad sense.
Corporate finance is defined much more broadly to include any business decisions made by a firm
that affect its finance. According to the modern approach, financial management provides a
conceptual and analytical framework for the three major financial decision making functions of a
firm. Accordingly, the scope of managerial finance involves the solution to investing, financing,
and dividend policy problems of a firm. Besides, unlike the old approach, here, the financial
manager’s role includes both acquiring of funds from external sources and allocating of the funds
efficiently within the firm thereby making internal decisions.
The increased globalization of business has expanded the scope of financial management further to
include financial decisions pertaining to the international financial environment.
Generally, the investment decisions of a firm deal with the left side of the basic accounting
equation: A = L + OE (Assets = Liabilities + Owners’ Equity).
The financing decisions deal with the financing of the firm’s investments, i.e., decisions whether
the firm should use equity or debt funds in order to finance its assets. They are also concerned with
determining the most appropriate composition of short – term and long – term financing. In simple
terms, the financing decisions deal with determining the best financing mix or capital structure of
the firm.
The financing decisions of a firm are generally concerned with the right side of the basic
accounting equation.
The dividend decisions address the question how much of the cash a firm generates from operations
should be distributed to owners in the form of dividends and how much should be retained by the
business for further expansion. There are tradeoffs on the dividend policy of a firm. Paying out
more dividends will make the firm to be perceived strong and healthy by investors; on the other
hand, it will affect the future growth of the firm. So the dividend decision of a firm should be
analyzed in relation to its financing decisions.
1.7. The Goal Of A Firm In Financial Management
1.7.1. The Need for a Goal and Characteristics of a Good Goal
A goal or an objective provides a framework for the decision maker. In most cases, the goal is
stated in terms of maximizing or minimizing some variable. A goal, therefore, is an explicit
operational guide or decision rule for the decision maker.
Although it is very difficult, a firm should be able to have a specific goal for the following two
basic reasons.
1. If a goal is not chosen, there is no way to select among alternative decision criteria. Without
an objective to achieve, there would be a number of approaches to select from available
decision rules.
2. If multiple goals are chosen, it is hardly possible to prioritize the decision criteria; and the
firm might end up achieving none of them
If a firm cannot choose its right goal, it can suffer severe consequences even to the extent of going
out of business. In fact, selecting the right goal is not such a simple task; but a good objective has
the following characteristics.
1. It is clear and unambiguous – a clear goal will lead to decision criteria that do not vary
from case to case and from person to person.
2. It provides a clear and timely measure to evaluate the success or failure of decisions.
decisions.
3. There should be some means to measure the objective.
4. It does not affect the specific benefits of a firm.
5. It does not affect the welfare of the society.
Profit maximization, though widely professed, should not be used as a good goal of a firm in
financial management. This is because it fails to meet many of the characteristics of a good goal.
16.2.2. Limitations of Profit Maximization
1. Ambiguity. The term profit or income is vague and ambiguous concept. Different people
understand profit in different several ways.
There are many different economic and accounting definitions of profit, each open to its own
set of interpretations. Even in accounting profit might refer to short-term or long-term profit,
total profit or profit on a per share basis (earnings per share), and before or after text profit.
Then, the question or the problem would be which profit is to be maximized? Maximizing
one may lead to minimizing the other.
Furthermore, problems related to inflation and international currency transactions complicate
the issue of profit maximization.
2. Cash flows. The profit a firm has reported does not represent the cash flows to the business.
Firms reporting a very high total profit or earnings per share might face difficulty of paying
cash dividends to stockholders.
3. Timing of Benefits. The profit maximization criterion ignores the differences in the time
pattern of benefits received from investment proposals. This criterion does not consider the
distinction between returns (benefits) received in different time periods and treats all benefits
as equally valuable irrespective of the time pattern differences in benefits. In other words, the
profit maximization ignores the time value of money, i.e., money today is better than money
tomorrow. Also it does not consider the sooner, the better principle.
The profit maximization criterion ranks both projects as being equal. However, project X provides
higher benefits in earlier years and project Y provides larger benefits in later years. The higher
benefits of project X in earlier years could be reinvested to earn even higher profits for later years.
Profit seeking organizations must consider the timing of cash flows and profits because money
received today has a higher value than money received tomorrow. Cash flows in early years are
valued more highly than equivalent cash flows in later years.
4. Quality of Benefits (Risk of Benefits). Profit maximization assumes that risk or uncertainty
of future benefits is not concern to stockholders. Risk is defined as the probability that actual
benefit will differ from the expected benefit. Financial decision making involves a risk-return
trade-off. This means that in exchange for taking greater risk, the firm expects a higher
return. The higher the risk, the higher the expected return.
Example: - Nyala Merchandising Private Limited Company must choose between two projects.
Both projects cost the same. Project A has a 50% chance that its cash flows would be actual over
the next three years. Project B, on the other hand, has a 90% probability that its cash flows for the
next three years would be realized.
BENEFITS
Under profit maximization, project A is more attractive because it adds more to Nyala than
project B. However, if we consider the risk of the two projects, the situation would be
reversed.
Expected benefit of project A = Br. 220,000 x 50% = Br. 110,000
Expected benefit of project B = Br. 180,000 x 90% = Br. 162,000
In fact, risk can be measured in different ways, and different conclusions about the riskiness
of a course of action can be reached depending on the measure used. In addition to the
probability distribution, illustrated above, risk can also be measured on the basis of the
variation of cash flows.
The more certain the expected cash flow (return), the higher the quality of benefits (i.e., low
risk to investor). Conversely, the more uncertain or fluctuating the expected benefits, the
lower the quality of benefits (i.e., high risk to investors).
1.7.3. Wealth Maximization As A Decision Rule
1.7.3.1. Meaning Of Wealth Maximization
Wealth maximization means maximization of the value of a firm. Hence wealth
maximization is also called value maximization or net present value (NPV) maximization.
To understand and appreciate the essence of wealth maximization, we need to consider the
various stakeholders in a given corporation. Stakeholders are all individuals or group of
individuals who have a direct or indirect interest in the firm. They include stockholders,
debtors, managers, employees, customers, governmental agencies and others. But among
these, managers should give priority to stockholders. In fact, the overriding premise of
financial management is that a firm should be managed to enhance the well-being or wealth
of its existing common stockholders. Stockholders’ wellbeing depends on both current and
expected dividend payments and market price of the firm’s common stock.
There are several reasons why wealth maximization decision criterion is superior to other
criteria.
First,
First, it has an exact measurement unlike profit maximization. It depends on cash flows
(inflows and outflows).
Second,
Second, wealth maximization as a decision criterion considers the quality as well as the
time pattern of benefits.
Third,
Third, it emphasizes on the long-term and sustainable maximization of a firm’s common
stock price in the financial market.
Fourth, wealth maximization gives recognition to the interest of other stakeholders and
to the societal welfare on the long-term basis.
Technically, wealth maximization as a decision rule involves a comparison of value to cost.
Thus, an action that has a discounted value that exceeds its cost can be said to create value
and such action should be undertaken. Whereas an action with less discounted value than cost
reduces wealth and, therefore, should be rejected. The discounted value is a value which
takes risk and timing of benefits into account.
1.7.3.2. Limitations of Wealth Maximization
The limitations of wealth maximization refer to the potential side costs of wealth
maximization if adopted as a decision criterion.
1. If wealth maximization is taken as the sole decision rule, there is a possibility that the
benefits of the society at large might be forgone. Fortunately, however, this problem is not
unique to wealth maximization. Even if an alternative goal is used, still this problem
continues to persist.
2. When managers of a corporation are separate from owners, there is a potential for a
conflict of interest between them. This conflict of interest can lead to the maximization of
manages’ interest instead of the welfare of stockholders.
3. When the goal of a firm is stated in terms of stockholders wealth, actions that increase the
wealth of stockholders could be taken as the expense of other stakeholders like debt-holders.
4. Wealth maximization is normally reflected in the firm’s stock price. But if there are
inefficiencies in financial markets, wealth maximization decision rule may lead to
misallocation of scarce resources.
1.8. Conflict of goals between management and owners: Agency problem
As you understand, in a corporate form of business organization owners (stockholders) do not
run the activities of the firm. Rather, the stockholders elect the board of directors, who in turn
assign the management on behalf of the owners. So, basically, managers are agents of the
owners of the corporation and they undertake all activities of the firm on behalf of these
owners. Managers are agents in a corporation to maximize the common stockholders’ well-
being.
However, there is a conflict of goals between managers and owners of a corporation and
mangers may act to maximize their interest instead of maximizing the wealth of owners.
Managers are interested to maximize their personal wealth, job security, life style and fringe
benefits.
The natural conflict of interest between stockholders and managerial interest create agency
problems. Agency problems are the likelihood that mangers may place their personal goals a
head of corporate goals. Theoretically, agency problems are always there as long as mangers
are agents of owners.
Corporations (owners) are aware of these agency problems and they incur some costs as a
result of agency. These costs are called agency cost and include: