1.

The graph below shows the production levels of the main kinds
of fuel in the UK between 1981 and 2000. Summarise the
information by selecting and reporting the main features, and
make comparison where relevant.

Introduction :

- The given line graph illustrates the production levels of three main
kinds of fuel in the England from 1981 to 2000.
- The given line graph illustrates how much energy was produced from
three main kinds of fuel in England from 1981 and 2000.

Overview:

- Overall, it can be seen that while the production levels of natural gas and
petroleum rose yearly, the production level of coal experienced a significant
drop. In addition, the petroleum was always produced highest compared to
other kind of fuels.
At the start of the period, the average of production levels of petroleum
stood at around 90 unit, slightly surprassing the figure for the production
level of coal, about 10 unit. The figure of the production of petroleum was
nearly higher than the natural gas about 50 unit. (At the start of the period,
the average production level of petroleum stood at around 90 units, slightly
surpassing the production level of coal, which was about 80 units.
Furthermore, the energy units of natural gas accounted for only half of the
production levels of coal, at 40 units. )

(In 1981, petroleum emerged as the dominant category, with around 90

energy units produced. This was followed by coal, at 80 energy units,
double the figure for natural gas.)

Afterward, the figure of the production of petroleum remained relatively

stable about 140 unit from 1985 to 1987. However, it experienced
significant drop about 100 unit in 1991. Opposite change(s) can be seen in
the data(hoi du) in the production level of coal which decreased
significantly, at 40 unit(s) in 1985, slightly increased to 60 unit in 1986 and
it tended to decrease gradually over the years. Meanwhile, the figure of the
production of natural gas was always stable about 40 unit between 1985
and 1988, and it significantly rose about 100 unit at the end of the period.

(Afterward , the level of petroleum production experienced an upward trend

, ending the period with 140 energy unit and still leading as the dominant
category. Meanwhile, natural gas production witnessed a moderate
increase at the start of the period before increasing significantly to 100
energy units, surpassing coal as the second most popular fuel. Conversely
, the downward trend can be seen in coal, as its figure at rock bottom of
roughly 40 energy units in 2000. )
 2. The graph below shows the percentages of tourists who used
different types of transport to travel within a particular nation
between 1989 and 2009. Each tourist may have used more than
one type of transport.

Introduction :

- The given line graph illuatrates the percentages of travelers who used
various types of transport to sight-seeing within a particular nation
from 1989 to 2009.

Overview:

- Overall, it can be seen that while the percentages of tourists who used
different transports as car, rail and coach rose yearly, the percentages of
tourists used air can be observed significant drop. In addition, the
percentages of guests used car was the highest means of transportation
compare to others.

At the start of the period, the percentage of tourist who used car to travel in
particular country rose significantly about 60% at the peak in 1999, and
slightly tended to decrease 50% in 2009. However, it can be observed that
in 1989, the percentage of tourists used rail is lower than car at around
35%, and it increased significantly to roughly 60%. The data of the tourist
who used air at the begining of the period has been changed at about 40%
and slightly updown trend to 20% at the end of the period.

(At the start of the period, nearly half of tourists (nearly 50% of tourist)
traveled around the country by car, establishing it as the most prevalent
(popular) vehicle. This was followed by airway and rail lines, with their
respective figures standing at 40% and 35% (stood at 40% and 35%,
respectively). Meanwhile, there were around 10% of tourists choosing
coaches, double the figure for ferries.)

Meanwhile, the pecentage of the tourist used coach and ferry has a
contrast. At the start of the period, the number of tourist used coach was
higher than ferry at about 5%. Conversely, it has changed at the end of the
period. The figure of the tourist used coach was slightly increased at about
25% in 2009, and the percentage of tourist used ferry fell into 9%.

(Thereafter, the percentage of those traveling by car surged to(increased

to) over 60% in 1999, after which it dropped considerably to just over 50%
over the next 10 years. Railways registered a notable ascending
trend(upward trend), with its figure rising sharply to nearly 60% and
surpassing cars to become the most commonplace means(phuong tien) of
transport at the end of the period. Opposite changes can be seen in the
proportion of those traveling by airplane, which fell remarkably to just 20%
in 2009. Finally, coach and ferry all recorded growths(experienced
significant growth) in their popularity, but the figure for the former grew
significantly to roughly 25% while the latter experienced a more modest
(khiem ton)rise to just 10% at the end of the given time span.)
 3. The graph below gives information about computer possession
by households in one European country between 1997 and
2011.

Introduction :

- The given line graph illustrates computer possession by households

in European country from 1997 to 2011.
- (The given line graph illustrates the changes in computer ownership
among households in a European country from 1997 to 2011.)

Overview:
- Overall, it can be seen that while the percentage of household using two
computers and three or more computers upward trend, the percentage of
household without using computers significant drop. In addition, household
using their own computer was always the highest percentage(at leading
place) compared to others.

(Overall, a shift from a significant lack of ownership in 1997 to a landscape

in 2011 where a substantial portion of households owned not just one, but
multiple computers. Also evident is that households with a single computer
retained the majority share despite the growing prevalence of dual or more
computers.)

At the start of the period, the average number of families do not own a
computer stood at 47% , slightly surpassing the figure for the families only
own one computer at 45%, respectively. Meanwhile, the percentage of the
family had three or more computers was the lowest at about 2%, lower than
the figure of the household had two computers at about 10%.

(At the start of the period in 1997, nearly half of families did not own any
computer. Meanwhile, approximately 45% of households had one
computer, a figure tremendously higher (cao hon hoan toan) than the
percentage of those with two computers, at 10%. There was a moderately
figure only 2% of families having three or more computers.)

Conversely, the figure of the household used one computer only remained
stable at about 45% from 1999 to 2011. At the end of the period, the
percentage of family that do not own computers tended to decrease
significantly to 20%. Meanwhile, the figure of families used two computer
and three or more computers increased significantly at about 10% and
roughly 30% at the end of the period, respectively.

(Moreover, non-computer households exhibited(experienced) a consistent

downward trend, ending at approximately 20% in 2011. In contrast,
families of two computers and three or more computers followed an
ascending (upward) trend. Notably (dang nhac den la), the former
witnessed a dramatic increasing, peaking at almost 30% in 2011, while the
latter experienced a more modest growth, reaching around 10% in the
same year. Finally, a relatively stable pattern can be seen in the figure for
households with just one computer, hovering around = stood at 45%
throughout the entire period.)

4. The graph below shows the percentage of people by age group

visiting the cinema at least once per month in one particular
country between 1978 and 2008.

Introduction :

-The given line graph illustrates the percentage of four groups age of
people going to the cinema at least once a month in a specific country from
1978 to 2008.
- The given line graph illustrates the percentage of individuals belonging to
four distinct = diverse = different age groups who visited the cinema at least
once a month in a specific country from 1978 to 2008.

Overview:

- Overall, it can be seen that while the pecentage of the group at the age
14-24 and age 50+ experienced an upward trend. In contrast, the figure of
the people at the age 35-49 and age 25-34 has slightly fell down (can be
observed a downward trend) . In addition, the percentage of the age at 14-
24 was always at the highest percentage compared to others group.

(Overall, this behavior was particularly widenspread among individuals

aged 14 to 24. Among the four age categories, the figures for the older
groups experienced fluctuating upward trends, whereas the opposite was
observed for young people aged 14 to 34.)

At the start of the period, more than 90% at the age 14-24 went to the
cinema at least once a month, slightly surpassing the figure of the age
group 25-34 at about 80%. The percenatge of the age 35-49 accounted for
60%, while the group at the age 50+ had the lowest percentage at about
above 40%.

(In 1978, more than 90% of individuals aged 14 to 24 watched at least one
movie at the cinema on a monthly basis, closely followed by those in the 25
to 34 age bracket(range), with 80% exhibiting the same frequency of
moviegoers. Individuals aged 35 to 49 accounted for 60% of the cinema-
goers, while those above 50 years old was the only group that fell below
the 50% threshold (cot moc), with the figure for this age range stood at just
above 40%.)

Conversely, the percentage of the age 14-24 visited the cinema fluctuated
slightly around 90% and in 2008 it was decreased approximately around
90%. The group at the age 25-34 had been changed slightly from 80% in
1978 to 60% in 1988, and it drop roughly at about 80% in 2003. Meanwhile,
it experienced the percentage of the at age 35-49 and 50+ increased
significantly to 55% and just over 45%, respectively, by the end of the
period.

(Over the subsequent(next) 30 years, the percentage of 14-to-24-year-olds

visiting movie theaters at least once per month fluctuated slightly around
90%, ending the period at approximately 88% in 2008. The age group of 25
to 34 witnessed the most significant decline, dropping from 80% in 1978 to
60% in 1988, but it later rebounded, stabilizing at 80% from 1988 onwards.
Similar less pronounced patterns were observed for the remaining age
groups, with the figures for 35-to-49-year-olds and those above 50
gradually increasing to approximately 70% and 50% respectively, despite
minor fluctuations throughout the period.)