TERM PAPER ON

TIME DILATION AND LENGTH CONTRACTION

Submitted to: Lect. Harpreet Singh RB6902A05 10900627 B.tech M.B.A (ECE) Submitted by: Sri Charan D Roll no.

ACNOWLEDGEMENT
The satisfaction and euphoria that accompanies the successful completion of any task would be incomplete without the mention of the people who made it possible. I express my deep sense of gratitude to my institution lecturer Harpreet Singh, Lovely Institute of Science and Technology, affiliated to Lovely Professional University, Jalandhar for his invaluable guidance throughout the term paper. This acknowledgement would seem incomplete without thanking The Almighty. I am a firm believer that there is always a scope for improvements, so I will look forward to receive suggestions that would help me in my future projects and career.

TIME DILATION
Time dilation is a phenomenon described by the theory of relativity. It can be illustrated by supposing that two observers are in motion relative to each other, and/or differently situated with regard to nearby gravitational masses. They each carry a clock of identically similar construction and function. Then, the point of view of each observer will generally be that the other observer's clock is in error. There are two kinds of time dilation, and both can operate together.

OVERVIEW OF TIME DILATION

Time dilation can arise from (1) Relative velocity of motion between the observers (2) Difference in their distance from gravitational mass. (1) In the case that the observers are in relative uniform motion, and far away from any gravitational mass, the point of view of each will be that the other's (moving) clock is ticking at a slower rate than the local clock. The faster the relative velocity, the more is the rate of time dilation. This case is sometimes called special relativistic time dilation. It is often interpreted as time "slowing down" for the other (moving) clock. But that is only true from the physical point of view of the local

observer, and of others at relative rest (i.e. in the local observer's frame of reference). The point of view of the other observer will be that again the local clock (this time the other clock) is correct, and it is the distant moving one that is slow. From a local perspective, time registered by clocks that are at rest with respect to the local frame of reference (and far from any gravitational mass) always appears to pass at the same rate. (2) There is another case of time dilation, where both observers are differently situated in their distance from a significant gravitational mass, such as (for terrestrial observers) the Earth or the Sun. One may suppose for simplicity that the observers are at relative rest (which is not the case of two observers both rotating with the Earth -- an extra factor described below). In the simplified case, the general theory of relativity describes how, for both observers, the clock that is closer to the gravitational mass, i.e. deeper in its "gravity well", appears to go slower than the clock that is more distant from the mass (or higher in altitude away from the center of the gravitational mass). That does not mean that the two observers fully agree: each still makes the local clock to be correct; the observer more distant from the mass (higher in altitude) makes the other clock (closer to the mass, lower in altitude) to be slower than the local correct rate, and the observer situated closer to the mass (lower in altitude) makes the other clock (farther from the mass, higher in altitude) to be faster than the local correct rate. They agree at least that the clock nearer the mass is slower in rate, and on the ratio of the difference. This is gravitational time dilation.

OVERVIEW OF TIME DILATION FORMULAE

Time dilation due to relative velocity The formula for determining time dilation in special relativity is:

Where Is the time interval between two co-local events (i.e. happening at the same place) for an

observer in some inertial frame (e.g. ticks on his clock) this is known as the proper time, Is the time interval between those same events, as measured by another observer, inertially moving with velocity v with respect to the former observer, Is the relative velocity between the observer and the moving clock, Is the speed of light, and Is the Lorentz factor.

Thus the duration of the clock cycle of a moving clock is found to be increased: it is measured to be "running slow". The range of such variances in ordinary life, where, even considering space travel, are not great enough to produce easily detectable time dilation effects, and such vanishingly small effects can be safely ignored. It is only when an object approaches speeds on the order of 30,000 km/s (1/10 the speed of light) that time dilation becomes important.

EXPERIMENTAL CONFIRMATION
Time dilation has been tested a number of times. The routine work carried on in particle accelerators since the 1950s, such as those at CERN, is a continuously running test of the time dilation of special relativity. The specific experiments include:

Velocity time dilation tests

Ives and Stilwell (1938, 1941), An experimental study of the rate of a moving clock, in two parts. The stated purpose of these experiments was to verify the time dilation effect, predicted by Lamar-Lorentz ether theory, due to motion through the ether using Einstein's suggestion that Doppler Effect in canal rays would provide a suitable experiment. These experiments measured the Doppler shiftof the radiation emitted from cathode rays, when viewed from directly in front and from directly behind. The high and low frequencies detected were not the classical values predicted.

And and i.e. for sources with invariant frequencies the high and low frequencies of the radiation from the moving sources were measured as And as deduced by Einstein (1905) from the Lorentz transformation, when the source is running slow by the Lorentz factor. Rossi and Hall (1941) compared the population of cosmic-ray-produced muons at the top of a mountain to that observed at sea level. Although the travel time for the muons from the top of the mountain to the base is several muon half-lives, the muon sample at the base was only moderately reduced. This is explained by the time

dilation attributed to their high speed relative to the experimenters. That is to say, the muons were decaying about 10 times slower than if they were at rest with respect to the experimenters. Hasselkamp, Mondry, and Scharmann (1979) measured the Doppler shift from a source moving at right angles to the line of sight (the transverse Doppler shift). The most general relationship between frequencies of the radiation from the moving sources is given by:

As deduced by Einstein (1905)[1]. For ( ) this reduces to fdetected = frest. Thus there is no transverse Doppler shift, and the lower frequency of the moving source can be attributed to the time dilation effect alone.

Gravitational time dilation tests

Pound, Reba in 1959 measured the very slight gravitational red shift in the frequency of light emitted at a lower height, where Earth's gravitational field is relatively more intense. The results were within 10% of the predictions of general relativity. Later Pound and Snider (in 1964) derived an even closer result of 1%. This effect is as predicted by gravitational time dilation.

TIME DILATION AND SPACE FLIGHT

Time dilation would make it possible for passengers in a fast-moving vehicle to travel further into the future while aging very little, in that their great speed slows down the rate of passage of on-board time. That is, the ship's clock (and according to relativity, any human travelling with it) shows less elapsed time than the clocks of observers on Earth. For sufficiently high speeds the effect is dramatic. For example, one year of travel might correspond to ten years at home. Indeed, a constant 1 g acceleration would permit humans to travel as far as light has been able to travel since the big bang (some 13.7 billion light years) in one human lifetime. The space travellers could return to Earth billions of years in the future. A scenario based on this idea was presented in the novel Planet of the Apes by Pierre Boulle. A more likely use of this effect would be to enable humans to travel to nearby stars without spending their entire lives aboard the ship. However, any such application of time dilation during Interstellar travel would require the use of some new, advanced method of propulsion. Current space flight technology has fundamental theoretical limits based on the practical problem that an increasing amount of energy is required for propulsion as a craft approaches the speed of light. The likelihood of collision with small space debris and other particulate material is another practical limitation. At the velocities presently attained, however, time dilation is not a factor in space travel. Travel to regions of space-time where gravitational time dilation is taking

place, such as within the gravitational field of a black hole but outside the event horizon (perhaps on a hyperbolic trajectory exiting the field), could also yield results consistent with present theory.

LENGTH CONTRACTION
Length contraction, according to Hedrick Lorentz, is the physical phenomenon of a decrease in length detected by an observer in objects that travel at any non-zero velocity relative to that observer. This contraction (more formally called Lorentz contraction or Lorentz Fitzgerald contraction) is usually only noticeable, however, at a substantial fraction of the speed of light; and the contraction is only in the direction parallel to the direction in which the observed body is travelling. This effect is negligible at everyday speeds, and can be ignored for all regular purposes. It is only when an object approaches greater speeds, that it becomes important. At a speed of 13,400,000 m/s, the length is 99.9% of the length at rest and at a speed of 42,300,000 m/s still 99%. As the magnitude of the velocity approaches the speed of light, the effect becomes dominant, as can be seen from the formula:

Where L is the proper length (the length of the object in its rest frame), L' is the length observed by an observer in relative motion with respect to the object, Is the relative velocity between the observer and the moving object Is the speed of light, And the Lorentz factor is defined as

. Note that in this equation it is assumed that the object is parallel with its line of movement. Also note that for the observer in relative movement, the length of the object is measured by subtracting the simultaneously measured distances of both ends of the object. For more general conversions, see the Lorentz transformations. An observer at rest viewing an object travelling very close to the speed of light would observe the length of the object in the direction of motion as very near zero.

PHYSICAL ORIGIN OF LENGTH CONTRACTION?

Length contraction as a physical effect on bodies composed of atoms held together by electromagnetic forces was proposed independently by George FitzGerald and by Hendricks Lorentz. The following quote from Joseph Lamar is indicative of the prerelativity view of the effect as a consequence of James Clerk Maxwell's electromagnetic theory: "... if the internal forces of a material system arise wholly from electromagnetic actions between the system of electrons which constitute the atoms, then the effect of imparting to a steady material system a uniform velocity of translation is to produce a uniform contraction of the system in the direction of motion, of amount (1-v2/c2)1/2" The extension of this specific result to a general result was (and is) considered "ad hoc" by many who prefer Einstein's deduction of it from the Principle of Relativity without reference to any physics. In other words, length contraction is an inevitable consequence of the postulates of special relativity. To gain a little physical insight on why length contractions occur, consider what those postulates involve: by requiring the speed of light (a quantity dependent on the fundamental properties of space and time) to be invariant in all frames of reference (including ones in motion) one can appreciate that it would require the "distortion" of the measures of length and time. Apparently Lorentz did not agree to the criticism that his proposal was "ad hoc". "... The interpretation given by me and FitzGerald was not artificial. It was more so that it was the only possible one, and I added the comment that one arrives

at the hypothesis if one extends to other forces what one could already say about the influence of a translation on electrostatic forces. Had I emphasized this more, the hypothesis would have created less of an impression of being invented ad hoc." The TritonRankin experiment in 1908 showed that length contraction of an object according to one frame did not cause changes in the resistance of the object in its rest frame. This is in agreement with some current theories at the time (Special Relativity and Lorentz ether theory) but in disagreement with FitzGerald's ideas on length contraction.

Time Dilation and Length Contraction:

Suppose there are two vehicles. One is moving slightly faster than the other. You are sitting in the slower vehicle and want to measure the speed of the faster vehicle right from your seat. IN order to do that it is assumed that the faster vehicle is coming from behind the slower vehicle. As soon as the faster advancing vehicle comes exactly in your X-axis or exactly in your right or left front whatever the case may be, you begin measuring the distance per second. It was found that the distance covered by the faster moving vehicle just beside you was one half of your vehicle's length as you are measuring it with respect to your vehicle that is when it exactly juxtaposed your vehicle, you recorded a time t0,and when it excelled your vehicle about one half of your vehicle's length ,you recorded a time t1.The time difference between the two intervals is one second as you kept it so, so t1-t0=1Sec.Now stop your vehicle and measure its length, divide it by two to get the

half,.......Suppose it comes out to be 2meters if your vehicle is 4meters long.You measured the distance covered by the faster vehicle sitting in your own

slower moving vehicle, so your frame of reference is moving with respect to the faster moving vehicle. Let repeat this experiment again but this time the frame of reference will be at rest(apparent rest no absolute rest is there in the universe as every thing keep moving with respect to one another),that is to say a standing person is measuring the distance travelled by the faster vehicle in one second. No sooner does the faster vehicle cross the standing person on the road, then he records a time t0 and there is another friend on the footpath and has been assigned the duty of marking the field when he hears the sound form his friend. After one second the person yells at his friend and he marks the field just inside way front of the vehicle, and he record a time t1.The time difference must be one second as he kept it so. Now they measures the distance between the mark and the person standing that.........Suppose comes out to be 10meters.Thesupposition is based upon the actual happening and every one with normal brain or common sense will agree to it.Why the length or distance covered by the same faster vehicle differ when measured by the two observers? It is because the length or distance is contracted in accordance with the special theory of relativity. The length is shortened in the direction of the motion when your frame of reference is moving with respect to the item being measured. A relative stationary frame of reference will not show this contraction. This is what we call length contraction. Now; just think opposite of the above experiment. If the vehicle were to move 2meters per second with respect to the standingperson,it would have taken 5Secs to cover the 10 meters. It means that in moving vehicle, time slowed down, that is it dropped from 5secs to 1sec, or in other words time has been

dilated with respect to the stationary person. It means that each five seconds of the standing person equals one second of the person sitting in the slower moving vehicle. This is what we call Time Dilation and it's a real phenomenon. It follows that the standing person's life is reduced by 5secs and the life of the

Person sitting in the vehicle is just reduced by 1sec, that is to say that time is different in different frames of reference.Thefaster your frame of reference moves, and the slower is your aging process or the slower your time passes.

REFERENCES 1)www.phys.unsw.edu.au/.../jw/module 4_time_dilation.htm 2) hyperphysics.phyastr.gsu.edu/hbase/relativ/tdil.html 3) en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation 4) hubpages.com/hub/Time-Dilationand-Length-Contraction