The Effect of Glass Fiber On Concrete and Reinforc
The Effect of Glass Fiber On Concrete and Reinforc
The Effect of Glass Fiber On Concrete and Reinforc
To cite this article: A. Paulmakesh and Markos Gizachew Makebo 2021 J. Phys.: Conf. Ser. 2040 - Short Column Analysis with and Without
012027 Strengthening Reinforced Polymer Carbon
Fiber and Reinforced Polymer Glass Fiber
With Axial Loading
Abstract: Any service structures could suffer in unexpected time from one of the most
serious accidents is fire accidents. A small source is sufficient for a fire accident to be
ignited, but its shore is difficult to control. In Ethiopia, so many fire accidents took
place that in the near past have taken lives and house damage. For example, Merkato
area burnt down nearby shops at the Greater Anwar Mosque in Addis Ababa. The cause
of the accident has been investigated and a great number of homes and lives have been
demolished. A long fire period leads to structural failure, loss of valuable lives, etc.
The use of advanced finite elements and structural analysis models to determine the
fire growth within a compartment is currently undergoing good development to
determine temperatures within the component through a heat transfer analysis. This
study focussed more on the influence of fiberglass under high temperature on concrete
and reinforced concrete beams. In this study, different fiber glass percentage, concrete
temperature and fire exposure duration were discussed. Experimental tests on both
conventional and fiber-powered concrete at high temperatures have been done and the
compressive strength of the concrete cube is found to be reduced to 37.41% for two
hours at a 3000c temperature relative to initial concrete compression strength. Concrete
cylinder tensile strength decreases up to 20 percent at 3,000 cm for two hours, relatively
with initial concrete tensile strength, and the reinforced concrete beam's load-resisting
capacity decreases to 21 percent with 3,000 cm held for two hours. But by adding
0.75% of the fiber on concrete, the compressive strength increases to 21% compared
to normal cements. The concrete with0.75% fiber increases the divided tensile strength
by 29% over regular cement. The load resistance capacity for beams with 0.5% fiber
at the same temperature exceeds 9.4%. Thus fiber glass concrete has a high resistance
to load and a high fire resistance than conventional concrete.
1. Introduction
Concrete is the most widely used man-made construction material in the world today. It is
relatively inexpensive and simple to shape into any desired shape. Steel has been and continues
to be the most common reinforcing material for concrete. Steel material has numerous
advantages when used as reinforcing concrete; it is strong in tension and compression and has
Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021 (ICPAE 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2040 (2021) 012027 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2040/1/012027
a high modulus of elasticity[1]. It has the same thermal expansion as concrete and works well
with it under load. However, using steel as reinforcing concrete has some drawbacks; it
corrodes over time and has a low fire resistance. However, the main challenge for civil and
structural engineers is to provide society with sustainable, environmentally friendly, and
financially viable structures. Finding new materials that can meet these requirements is
essential. However, most fiberized materials on the market today have at least one major
drawback that prevents them from being widely used in structural applications. Fibers made
primarily of carbon fiber, for example, have exceptional structural properties such as a high
elastic modulus and a relatively high tensile strength[2]. However, their performance in fire
testing is less than desirable, and their cost makes them unsuitable for use in most applications.
Fiber glass, a relatively new fiber, is generating interest in the construction industry as a raw
material and fiber reinforcement polymer alternative to carbon fiber reinforced polymers. It is
made of glass fibers that are extremely fine. It is a lightweight, extremely strong, and sturdy
material. The most common synthetic fiber is glass fiber, which is chemically inert,
hydrophobic, and lightweight. They are manufactured as continuous cylindrical monofilaments
that can be cut to desired lengths. Glass fibers also help to reduce plastic shrinkage cracking
and subsidence cracking when used in conjunction with steel reinforcement[3].
Generally, this thesis investigates the resistance of the effect of adding glass fibers in concrete
and reinforced beam under elevated temperature. To determine whether the fiberized concrete
and RC concrete beam is highly resistance as compared with conventional one[7]. To compare
2
International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021 (ICPAE 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2040 (2021) 012027 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2040/1/012027
the performance of concrete and axially un-restrained RC beam element under elevated
temperature with and without fiber in terms of strength. To identify the different parameters
(Temperature and duration) which affect the performance of concrete and axially un-restrained
RC beam under elevated temperature with and without fiber.
2. Literature Review
David et al, 2008 Even though there is nothing in the world up to now that will assure the
control of fire ccident in service structures and buildings without causing significant damage,
there exists variety of active firefighting mechanisms and other manual options[9]. There are
different types of firefighting mechanisms some of them they are direct fighting systems others
are alarming types for the people living inside prior to possible total damage or partial damage.
Sprinkling system, fire detection and alarm system, fire Extinguishers, hose cabinet and stand
pipes of water for firefighting vehicle could be mentioned as examples of firefighting
mechanisms ACI216R-89, 1994 to compare the loss of life and resources during fire accident,
whatever it costs the design of structures for fire safety and fire resistance of desired rating
should be implemented[10]. The "safety factor" is contained in the fire resistance rating in the
design for fire. Therefore, for a particular situation a member with a resistance of four hours
should have a "safety factor" greater than one with a resistance rate of two hours
Beitragel & Wankiw, 2002. The impact of structural continuity on the global response of
buildings at risk of fire has shown the real impact of large-scale experiments and real events
such as the fire of Windsor Mtower in Madrid (Fletcher et al) and the World Trade Center
collapse in New York (Beitel and Wankiv 2002). Since then much work, particularly steel and
composite structures, has been done to understand the global fire response.. The global behavior
is still not fully understood in concrete structures, mainly due to the lack of reliable information
on material properties at high temperatures.
3
International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021 (ICPAE 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2040 (2021) 012027 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2040/1/012027
Cement: The cement used shall be Portland or Portland-Pozzolana cement from dangote is used
satisfying the requirements of the latest Ethiopian Standards on such cements.(EBCS -2,
1995).For this research PPC cement from dangote is used.
3.3. Rebar
10mm deformed bar and 6mm bar is used. The reinforcement used for the sample production
is made of Abyssinia steel factory, Ethiopia with steel grade S-520and its ultimate tensile
strength is 634 (MPa) from test results.
3.4. Water
Mixing water used to be clean and free from harmful matter. Potable water is used.
Quantity 25 MPa
No. Material Reinforced concrete Concrete cylinder
beam
1 Cement (PPC) 393.72 Kg 393.72 Kg
2 Fine Aggregate 677.33 Kg 677.33 Kg
3 Course Aggregate 1015.75Kg 1015.75Kg
4 Water 0.19686 m3 0.216546 m3
Table-2: Standard mixing for ordinary concrete structure per 50Kg bag of cement (EBCS -2,
1995).
4
International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021 (ICPAE 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2040 (2021) 012027 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2040/1/012027
4. Mix Proportioning
The basic mix proportion for C-25 grade of concrete is cement, fine aggregate, coarse
aggregate and water with mixing ratio of 1:1.67:3.12. Mix 1 and mix 2 contains 0% glass fiber.
Mix 3 and 4, mix 5 and 6, mix 7 and 8 contains 0.5%, 0.75% and 1.0% glass fiber by weight of
concrete respectively. A total of 8 mixes were studied with water-cement ratio of 0.50 for both
reinforced concrete beam and concrete cylinder to maintained C-25 MPa for all the concrete
mixes. The workability of the concrete with and without fiber is also checked within the limit
slump value according to the EBCS standard in using slump . The slump value lay under normal
range of 50mm- 100 mm. But the concrete with fiber affects the workability of the concrete; it
needs another recommended water cement ratio or special adding techniques. Increasing the
percentage beyond 0.75%, it reduce the workability of the concrete mix and it gives the
formation of mat and balling which is difficult to separate by vibration. When as we increases
the percentage of fiber beyond 1.0%, it may affects the workability of concrete mix.
100
80
Slump value (mm)
60
40
20
0
% of fiber
0 0.5 0.75 1
Figure 1: Slump test results for concrete with and without fiber
5
International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021 (ICPAE 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2040 (2021) 012027 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2040/1/012027
.
Figure – 3 : Representation of loading test of sample beam and its cross section
6
International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021 (ICPAE 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2040 (2021) 012027 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2040/1/012027
5. Results
Specimen % of Compressive
No. ID No.. fiber strength
(MPa)
NCC 29.6
1 NCC 3 0 24.71
NCC 26.78
Average Value 27.03
FCC0.5 31.5
2 FCC0.5 3 0.5, 29.12
FCC0.5 30.3
Average Value 30.31
FCC 0.75 33.40
3 FCC 0.75 3 0.75 30.60
FCC 0.75 34.00
Average Value 32.67
4 FCC1.0 28.90
FCC1.0 3 1.0 27.71
FCC1.0 27.00
Average Value 27.87
Table -4: The Result for compressive strength of concrete with and without fiber glass.
Compressive Strength (MPa)
1 hour 2 hour
Table - 5: Summary of the result for compressive strength of concrete with and without fiber
glass at elevated temperature.
7
International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021 (ICPAE 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2040 (2021) 012027 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2040/1/012027
% fiber by weight
1 hour 2 hours
of concrete
0.50 21 30.87
0.75 20 27.67
35
Compressive Strength (
30
25
MPa)
20
15
10
0 0.5 % of fiber 0.75 1
Figure 4: Variation of compressive strength of concrete with the addition of fiber glass
35
30
25 0.0%F
Stress, σ (Mpa)
0.5%F
20
0.75%F
15 1.0% F
10
5
0
0 0.0008 0.0015 0.0022 0.0024 0.0026 0.0028
Strain, ε (mm)
Figure 5: Stress and strain graph for concrete with and with out fiber
Figure 5 shows typical strain curves for horns with fiberglass and without fiberglass with
different strengths These curves match tests on specimens which resemble the compressive
pressure of the cube sample. The stress-train curves on figure 5 all increase to a maximum stress
8
International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021 (ICPAE 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2040 (2021) 012027 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2040/1/012027
of 0.0015 to 0.0022, with a descending branch. As discussed in section, the shape of this curve
results from the gradual formation of micro-cracks within the concrete structure. Fiberglass
concrete has a high capacity for caring than conventional concrete. Generally, the addition of
glass fiber to 0.75% by weight of concrete is stronger and more load-bearing than conventional
concrete. This shows that 0.75% of the concrete is more ductile than other materials.
.
Concrete without fiber glass
Load (Kn)
1 hour
2 hour
Temprature (0c)
Figure-7: Variation of maximum load versus temperature for beam sample without fiber
6. CONCLUSIONS
From this research, it was established that the fiber application in concrete reduces fresh
concrete workability. The results of the workingability test obtained in the standard slump test
demonstrated low workability. The conclusion was that the increased fiber weight in the
concrete would reduce workability. High dosage weight above 0.75 percent showed the
concrete to be considerably rigid and compact. However, blood and segregation in the concrete
mixture have also been reduced. With increased fiver-dose levels up to 0,75 percent, the
compressive strength of concrete increases, and then decreases. The optimal percentage of
fibers found in the research was therefore 0.75 percent and a continuous decrease of strength
was observed when the percentage of fiber dose increases. Split concrete tensile strength
increases up to 0.75%, and then it begins to decrease. The ideal percentage of fiber found in the
research is therefore 0.75 per cent and a continuous reduction in strength has been observed as
the percentage of the fiber dosage increases.
Fiber concrete is more resistant to the load than the fiberless cement in normal condition.
The heat lasts up to two hours, the tensile spillage strength of the normal concrete decreases by
9
International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021 (ICPAE 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2040 (2021) 012027 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2040/1/012027
20% and the strength of the conventional reinforced beam by 24,7% with high temperatures of
3000c. Bitter with the recommended fiber (0.75%) percentage sustained for two hours at a high
temperature of 3000c, decreases the initial division strength of concrete to 12.12%. Duration of
exposure to a fire up to two hours lowers conventional reinforced concrete beam's load-resistant
capacity to up to 28.12% when burnt at 3000c temperature. The load capacitance of the
reinforced fibre-glass beam is approximately 9 percent higher than the normal reinforced beam
at 3000c for 2h with 0.5 percent. • As can be seen in Figure 4.10. the strength of the tensile
cylinder samples burnt for 2000c is higher than the tensile strength of the cylinder samples
burnt for 1000c, this seems contrary to the results of the study because the fire temperatures
increase the tensile strength of the concrete decreases. However, for beam samples, it is
apparent that, due to quick drying of concrete past and porostructure, the strength of concrete
at a high temperature from 100-2000 cm increases and steel increases at that temP due to
residual stress. More research is needed to verify the effect of tensile strength and fire
performance variation in bending times. These generally show that fibre-glass concrete takes
precedence over normal concrete at room temperature and at its highest value.
REFERENCES
[1] ACI216R-89, (1994) “Guide for Determining the Fire Endurance of Concrete
Elements”, Reported by American Concrete Institute Committee 216.
[2] ASTM C293/C293M, (2011), “Standard Test Method for Flexural Strength of Concrete
(Using Simple Beam with Center-Point Loading),agencies of the Department of
Defense, Vol. 4,
[3] ASTM E119, (2000), “Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction
and Materials”, American Society for Testing and Materials.
[4] ASTM E119, (2014). “Standard Test Methods for Fire Tests of Building Construction
and Materials”
[5] Awadhesh Chandramauli, Amit Bahuguna and Azher Javaid, (2018), “The Analysis of
Plain Cement Concrete for future scope when mixed with Glass and Fibers”,
International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, Vol. 9, pp. 230–237, 2018.
Beam for Fire”, MSc Thesis, Addis Ababa University.
[6] Bažant, Z. P. (1992) Fracture mechanics of concrete structures. Abingdon, Oxon, USA,
Taylor &Francis.
[7] Beitel, J. and Iwankiw, N, (2002), “Analysis of Needs and Existing Capabilities for
Full-Scale Fire Resistance testing”, National Institute of Standards and Technology
NIST GCR 02-843.
[8] CASE, (2008) “Structural Engineer’s Guide to Fire Protection, Council of American
Structural Engineers,
[9] C. R. Cruz, “Elastic properties of concrete at high temperatures,” Journal of the PCA
Research and Development Laboratories, vol. 8, pp. 37– 45, 1966. View at Google
Scholar
[10] David N., (2008). “Fire and Concrete Structures” P.E., S.E., Director,
Engineered Structures and Mahmoud E. Kamara, PhD., Senior Structural Engineer.
[11] Ethiopian Building Code Standard, (1995) “Structural Use of Concrete”,
Ministry of Works & Urban Development, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.K. Elissa, “Title of
paper if known,” unpublished.
[12] Arvindan Sivasuriyan, D.S. Vijayan, Wojciech Górski, Magdalena Daria
Vaverková, Eugeniusz Koda, “Practical Implementation of Structural Health
Monitoring in Multi-Story Buildings”, Buildings 2021, 11, 263.
https://doi.org/10.3390/buildings11060263
10
International Conference on Physics and Energy 2021 (ICPAE 2021) IOP Publishing
Journal of Physics: Conference Series 2040 (2021) 012027 doi:10.1088/1742-6596/2040/1/012027
11