Metacognition2e 111202194356 Phpapp01
Metacognition2e 111202194356 Phpapp01
monitoring clarifying
directing understanding
connecting
How is this different from other
teaching strategies?
Experience/kn Assumptions
about what
Metacognitive owledge of the students Observed
strategies person understand Practices:
incorporate anmetacognitive instruction is to assist students to identify and
The focus of
awareness of: enlist strategies to promote and monitor learning.
Metaliteracy
Wray suggests that literacy experiences need to be
meaningful and purposeful from the child’s point of
view…….this often requires explicit instruction and
modelling from the teacher
We do not need to wait for students to become more
mature and more self-aware, with supportive teacher
behaviour, children can engage in metacognitive
operations like comprehension (Palincsar &
Brown, 1984) and revision (Fitzgerald, 1987) at a much
higher level.
Teacher modelling – shared
writing………
Shared writing provides teachers opportunities to:
work with the whole class, to model, explore and
discuss the decisions that writers make when they are
writing
make links between reading and writing explicit:
demonstrate how writers use language to achieve
particular effects
focus on particular aspects of the writing
process, such as planning, composing, revising or
editing
Think aloud………..
Shared thinking provides opportunities for teachers and
students to:
Make predictions about text
Make text connections
Ask questions about text as they read or listen
(monitoring and clarifying)
Reflect on reading (discussion, asking
questions, sharing insights)
Reciprocal teaching………..
Reciprocal teaching provides opportunities for students
to:
Take on the role of the teacher
Lead small groups
Ask questions, summarise, predict and clarify what
they have read
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xS_Ftio1ops&feature=player_detailpage
Connections
Acting
Divergent Converging
Thinking
Experience
Accommodating
Assimilation
Final Thoughts….
“Pedagogy must be oriented
not to the yesterday, but to
the tomorrow of the child’s
development. Only then
can it call to life in the
process of education those
processes of development
which now lie in the zone
of proximal development”
(Vygotsky, 1993, pp. 251-
252).
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FvyZ
sSQ3ul4&feature=player_detailpage
References
Kold, A., et al. (2009). The learning way: Meta-cognitive aspects of experiential Learning.
Sage Publications, 40(3).
Palincsar, A.S., & Brown, D.A (1987). Enhancing instruction time through attention to
metacognition. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 20(2), 66-75.
Sternberg, R.J. (1998). Metacognition, abilities, and developing expertise: What makes an
expert student? Instructional Science, 26(1), 127-140.
Wray, D. (2002). Metacognition and literacy. In G. Reid & J. Wearmouth (Eds.), Dyslexia and
Literacy. London: Wiley.