Aansf4
Aansf4
Aansf4
1. Dow Medical College, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, PAK 2. Internal Medicine, Jinnah
Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi, PAK 3. Neurology, Charleston Area Medical Center, Charleston, USA 4. Civil
Hospital, Dow University of Health Sciences (DUHS), Karachi, PAK 5. Internal Medicine, Basic Health Unit Larhi,
Gambat, Gambat, PAK
Abstract
Epilepsy is considered to be one of the most common non-communicable neurological diseases especially in
low to middle-income countries. Approximately one-third of patients with epilepsy have seizures that are
resistant to antiepileptic medications. Clinical trials for the treatment of medically refractory epilepsy have
mostly focused on new drug treatments, and result in a significant portion of subjects whose seizures
remain refractory to medication. The off-label use of cannabis sativa plant in treating seizures is known
since ancient times. The active ingredients of this plant are delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC) and
cannabidiol (CBD), the latter considered safer and more effective in treating seizures, and with less adverse
psychotropic effects.
Clinical trials prior to two years ago have shown little to no significant effects of cannabis in reducing
seizures. These trials seem to be underpowered, with a sample size less than 15. In contrast, more recent
studies that have included over 100 participants showed that CBD use resulted in a significant reduction in
seizure frequency. Adverse effects of CBD overall appear to be benign, while more concerning adverse effects
(e.g., elevated liver enzymes) improve with continued CBD use or dose reduction.
In most of the trials, CBD is used in adjunct with epilepsy medication, therefore it remains to be determined
whether CBD is itself antiepileptic or a potentiator of traditional antiepileptic medications. Future trials
may evaluate the efficacy of CBD in treating seizures due to specific etiologies (e.g., post-traumatic, post-
stroke, idiopathic).
Categories: Neurology
Keywords: epilepsy, cannabis, refractory epilepsy
Review
Methodology
We carried this literature review in January 2018. The data were collected from the trials which were
published during the year 1978 to 2017. Major search engines used were PubMed and Google Scholar. We
used keywords such as cannabis, epilepsy and randomized control trials. We restricted our data collection to
those randomized control trials which were published in the English language only.
We included six trials which were performed in the year 1978-2017. The inclusion criteria included the trials
reporting a decrease in seizure frequency and were performed for at least 12 weeks. We did not include any
Results
There were six studies which met our inclusion criteria and were included in our literature review. In each
trial, patients continued their regular antiepileptic drugs along with either placebo or CBD.
In 1978, Mechoulam and Carlini conducted a double-blinded clinical trial. A total of nine patients with
treatment-resistant epilepsy were included. Out of those nine patients, four were randomly assigned in the
CBD group and five in the placebo group. Patients in the CBD group were given 200 mg of CBD daily for three
months. Two of the epilepsy patients had no seizure during the whole three months of treatment, and the
third one had partial improvement while no improvement was observed in the fourth one. There was no
significant toxicity [10].
In 1980, Cunha et al. conducted a double-blinded trial. They included 15 patients suffering from secondary
generalized epilepsy with a temporal focus. Out of 15, eight patients were included in the treatment group
and seven were included in the placebo group. Each patient in the treatment group received 200–300 mg of
CBD daily for a period of eight to 18 weeks. Electroencephalography (EEG) and electrocardiography (ECG)
were performed at 15–30 days interval. Four of the patients in the treatment group were seizure-free while
three had partial improvement and the remaining one did not have any effect [11].
Ames et al. conducted a double-blinded clinical trial, in which 12 mentally retarded institutionalized
patients with uncontrolled seizures were assigned in either the treatment or control group with six patients
in each group. Patients in the treatment group were given 300 mg of CBD for one week and then 200 mg of
CBD for the next three weeks. No difference in the seizure frequency was reported [12].
In Trembly et al., a crossover trial was conducted with 12 patients. In this trial, all 12 patients were treated
with placebo for six months followed by 300 mg of CBD or placebo in a crossover trial, which lasted for an
additional 12 months. There was no any change in seizure frequency and side effects [13].
Devinsky et al. included 162 patients with Dravet syndrome and Lennox-Gastaut syndrome in a safety
analysis and a subgroup with 137 patients were included in the efficacy analysis. The patients were treated
with 2–5 mg/kg of CBD per day which was titrated up to 50 mg/kg/day for a period of 12 weeks. Reduction in
monthly seizure frequency in the efficacy group was 36.5%, with the greatest reduction recorded in patients
with atonic and focal seizures. Most common adverse effects faced by patients in the safety analysis group
were somnolence, decreased appetite, diarrhea, fatigue, and convulsions. The serious adverse effects were
reported in 30% of the patients, including one death which was regarded as unrelated to the study drug.
Status epilepticus was the most common serious adverse effect reported [5].
Devinsky et al. in the year 2017 conducted a double-blind clinical trial. In this trial, 120 children and young
adults with Dravet syndrome and drug-resistant epilepsy were randomly assigned. Patients in the treatment
group received 20 mg/kg/day for a period of 14 weeks including a titration phase of two weeks. The median
frequency of seizures decreased from 12.4 to 5.9 in the treatment group and 14.9 to 14.1 in the placebo
group. In the treatment group 43% of the patients and in the placebo group 27% of patients had >50%
reduction in the seizure frequency. Patients having seizures without convulsions were not affected by the
CBD therapy remarkably. In the treatment group, 5% of the patients also became seizure-free during
treatment. However, 75% of the patients in the treatment group faced adverse effects such as diarrhea,
vomiting, fatigue, pyrexia, and somnolence – somnolence being the most common (Table 1) [14].
Six in CBD
Ames et al. CBD 300 mg/day x one week 200
group, Six in No difference Somnolence
(1986) [12] mg/day x next three weeks
placebo group
Discussion
About one-third of epileptic patients do not respond well to the conventional antiepileptic drugs [5].
Moreover, there are many side effects associated with them such as osteomalacia and anemia. This demands
a need for an antiepileptic drug in the market with better efficacy and lesser adverse effects. For centuries,
CBD is considered by the general populace to have anticonvulsants properties. However, these substances
could not find a place in the current prescription regimen to treat seizures because of the two main reasons.
First, no sufficient number of trials have been done which could prove their efficacy in treating or
preventing seizure episodes. Second, there are concerns about their safety in the long-run.
Endocannabinoids (cannabinoids synthesized normally within the central nervous system (CNS)) have a role
in decreasing the release of excitatory neurotransmitter in CNS, hence preventing from seizures [15]. They
act on CB1 and CB2 receptors with former being expressed by central and peripheral neurons, while the
latter are mainly expressed by immune cells but are also found in the brain cells [16]. An old thought of CB1
receptors being the only ones involved into neuronal activity regulation has been challenged by a recent
experimental study on rats, which concluded that loss of both types of receptors will result into a
spontaneous and more severe form of seizures than the loss of CB1 receptors alone [17]. This formulates that
the development of potential drugs enhancing the activity of these receptors could be used as a therapeutic
means for seizure disorders. Cannabis is extracted from the Cannabis Sativa plant, which has more THC than
CBD. THC is psychoactive while CBD has little to no psycho-activity. Also, CBD has more antiepileptic
properties, thus drawing attention to the preparations with more CBD to THC proportion [18]. Lesser adverse
effects with CBD could be there because CBD has a weak activity at CB1 and CB2 receptors. CBD instead
works by other mechanisms such as transient receptor potential (TRP) cation channels resulting in a
decrease in the presynaptic release of glutamate [8,19].
In 1977, in an experiment conducted on rats, it was postulated that the anticonvulsant effects of CBD could
be compared with those of phenytoin, and protective effects to decrease relapses were comparable to
phenobarbital. Short-term analysis has also shown that CBD is a safe drug in humans with no psychotropic
activity, no changes on clinical and laboratory examination, and no effects on EEG and ECG [11]. Besides,
having the long half-life (30 hours when given through the intravenous route and 23 hours when given
orally) will also be helpful in patient-compliance [20].
Recently, the first time a randomized, controlled, double-blinded multi-center study was done to appreciate
the potential effects of CBD in controlling drop seizures in patients with Lennox-Gastaut syndrome (a
childhood onset seizure disorder associated with encephalopathy which usually is multi-drug resistant) [22].
A total of 171 patients were randomly divided into a drug or placebo group in 1:1 pattern. There was 43.9%
reduction of drop seizures in CBD group patients and 21.8% of the reduction in the patients who were in the
placebo group. Besides drop seizures, the frequency of other types of seizures was also reduced drastically
which reflected a wide spectrum of effects of CBD in controlling different types of seizures. The most
common adverse effects (in >10% of cases), though mild to moderate in severity, including somnolence,
diarrhea, and decreased appetite were seen in 86% of patients who were in CBD group and 69% of patients
who were in the placebo group. The most serious treatment-related adverse effect occurred was an elevation
of liver enzymes (alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, and gamma-glutamyltransferase)
in >3% cases but resolved on their own with the continuation of the treatment. Additional studies on
adverse effects of CBD are needed since most of the patients in the studies so far were concomitantly taking
other antiepileptics such as valproate and clobazam, which may have confounded the results.
In 2017, an Australian Nationwide survey on medical cannabis use for epilepsy was carried out, which
included 976 responders (patients with epilepsy and/or parents/guardians of patients with epilepsy). It
showed that around 15% of patients used cannabis irrespective of their physician’s knowledge to control
their multi-drug resistant seizures and to get rid of the adverse effects associated with traditional
antiepileptic drugs. Most of them reported an improvement in their seizures [23].
Conclusions
We have reviewed multiple clinical trials on drug-resistant epilepsy and have discussed their results in this
review article. There is an increasing interest in developing cannabis preparations for the treatment of drug-
resistant epilepsy as they are observed to be more efficacious with less side effect profile. Hence, we
encourage research in this area in order to help decrease the morbidity and mortality associated with drug-
resistant epilepsy.
Additional Information
Disclosures
Conflicts of interest: In compliance with the ICMJE uniform disclosure form, all authors declare the
following: Payment/services info: All authors have declared that no financial support was received from
any organization for the submitted work. Financial relationships: All authors have declared that they have
no financial relationships at present or within the previous three years with any organizations that might
have an interest in the submitted work. Other relationships: All authors have declared that there are no
other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.
References
1. Diop AG, de Boer HM, Mandlhate C, Prilipko L, Meinardi H: The global campaign against epilepsy in Africa .
Acta Trop. 2003, 87:149-159. 10.1016/S0001-706X(03)00038-X
2. Ngugi AK, Kariuki SM, Bottomley C, Kleinschmidt I, Sander JW, Newton CR: Incidence of epilepsy: a
systematic review and meta-analysis. Neurology. 2011, 77:1005-1012. 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31822cfc90
3. Kwan P, Schachter SC, Brodie MJ: Drug-resistant epilepsy. N Engl J Med. 2011, 365:919-926.
10.1056/NEJMra1004418
4. Tang F, Hartz AMS, Bauer B: Drug-resistant epilepsy: multiple hypotheses, few answers . Front Neurol. 2017,
8:301. 10.3389/fneur.2017.00301
5. Devinsky O, Marsh E, Friedman D, et al.: Cannabidiol in patients with treatment-resistant epilepsy: an
open-label interventional trial. Lancet Neurol. 2016, 15:270-278. 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00379-8
6. Russo EB: Cannabis and epilepsy: an ancient treatment returns to the fore . Epilepsy Behav. 2017, 70:292-
297. 10.1016/j.yebeh.2016.09.040
7. Rosenberg EC, Tsien RW, Whalley BJ, Devinsky O: Cannabinoids and epilepsy. Neurotherapeutics. 2015,
12:747-768. 10.1007/s13311-015-0375-5
8. Friedman D, Devinsky O: Cannabinoids in the treatment of epilepsy . New Engl J Med. 2015, 373:1048-1058.
10.1056/NEJMra1407304