AVCOE, Sangamner, Department of Computer Engineering 2023-24

SAVITRIBAI PHULE PUNE UNIVERSITY

A PROJECT REPORT ON

“Plagiarism Checker in Python”

SUBMITTED TO THE SAVITRIBAI PHULE PUNE UNIVERSITY,

PUNE IN THE PARTIAL FULFILLMENT OF THE
REQUIREMENTS FOR THE T.E. COMPUTER ENGINEERING

BACHELOR OF ENGINEERING
(Computer Engineering)(T.E. SEM-I)

SUBMITTED BY
Naikwadi Omkar Nitendra 3211

Under The Guidance

of Dr. S.K.Sonkar

DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING

Amrutvahini College of Engineering, Sangamner Amrutnagar,
Ghulewadi - 422608 2023-24
 AMRUTVAHINI COLLEGE OF ENGINEERING, SANGAMNER
DEPARTMENT OF COMPUTER ENGINEERING

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that,

Naikwadi Omkar Nitendra 3211

Students in Third Year Computer Engineering has successfully completed them project titled
“Plagiarism Checker in Python” at Amrutvahini College of Engineering, Sangamner towards
partial fulfillment of project Work in Third year Computer Engineering.

Dr. S.K. Sonkar Dr. S.K.Sonkar

Project Guide H.O.D
Dept. of Computer Engg. Dept. of Computer Engg.
 Acknowledgment

Achievement is finding out what you have been doing and what you have to do. The higher is
submit, the harder is climb. The goal was fixed and we began with the determined resolved and
put in a ceaseless sustained hard work. Greater the challenge, greater was our determination and
it guided us to overcome all difficulties. For everything we have achieved, the credit goes to who
had really help us to complete this project and for the timely guidance and infrastructure. Before
we proceed any further, we would like to thank all those who have helped me in all the way
through. To start with we thank our guide Dr. S.K.Sonkar, for his guidance, care and support,
which she offered whenever we needed it the most. We would also like to take this opportunity
to thank to our respected Head of Department DR.S.K.Sonkar. We also thankful to Honourable
Principal Dr. M. A. Venkatesh Sir for his encouragement and support.
 TABLE OF CONTENT

Certificate 2

Acknowledgement 3

Table of Content 4

1. Introduction.................................................................................................................................5

1.1 Introduction...................................................................................................................5

1.2 Definition of Problem...................................................................................................7

1.3 Objectives.....................................................................................................................7

2. Methodology...............................................................................................................................8

2.1 Proposed Work.............................................................................................................8

2.2 Block Diagram..............................................................................................................9

2.2.1 Data Flow Diagram.......................................................................................9

2.2.2 Use Case Diagram.......................................................................................10

3. Software and Hardware Requirement......................................................................................11

3.1 Software Requirement.................................................................................................11

3.2 Hardware Requirement................................................................................................11

4. Design........................................................................................................................................12

5. Conclusion.................................................................................................................................15

6. Bibliography..............................................................................................................................16
 1.INTRODUCTION

1.1 Introduction

The Plagiarism Checker project in Python is a comprehensive effort aimed at developing a

sophisticated system for detecting plagiarism in text documents. Plagiarism, the act of using
someone else's work without proper attribution, is a significant concern in academic, professional,
and creative fields. The goal of this project is to provide a tool that can assist educators,
researchers, and content creators in ensuring the integrity of their work.

The Plagiarism-checker-Python project aims to develop a plagiarism detection system that can
analyze the similarity between two text documents and identify potential instances of plagiarism.
The system will preprocess the input documents, compare their similarity using various algorithms,
and generate a detailed report highlighting the plagiarized content.

It provides features such as text preprocessing, similarity comparison using algorithms like cosine
similarity, Jaccard similarity, or Levenshtein distance, threshold setting, interactive interface, and
report generation.

This report will delve into the key features, functionalities, and technologies employed in the
development of the Plagiarism Checker System. Additionally, it will discuss the challenges
encountered during the development process, the solutions implemented to overcome them, and the
future enhancements envisioned for the system.

Key Features:

1. Text Preprocessing:
 Removes punctuation, converts text to lowercase, and tokenizes the text into
individual words or tokens.
2. Similarity Comparison:
 Utilizes advanced similarity comparison algorithms such as cosine similarity,
Jaccard similarity, or Levenshtein distance to quantify the similarity between
text documents.
3. Threshold Setting:
 Allows users to set a similarity threshold beyond which two documents are
considered plagiarized, providing flexibility in customization.
4. Interactive User Interface:
 Offers an intuitive user interface, which can be either a command-line
interface (CLI) or a graphical user interface (GUI), for seamless interaction
with the plagiarism checker.

5
5. Report Generation:
 Generates detailed reports highlighting the similarity percentage and
providing snippets of plagiarized content, aiding users in understanding and
addressing potential instances of plagiarism.
6. Supported File Formats:
 Supports common file formats such as .txt, .doc, .docx, etc., ensuring
compatibility with various types of text documents.
7. Modular Architecture:
 Designed with modular components for text preprocessing, similarity
comparison, threshold setting, user interface, and report generation,
enabling easy maintenance and scalability.
8. Algorithm Selection:
 Allows users to choose from a range of similarity comparison algorithms
based on their specific requirements, ensuring accuracy and reliability in
plagiarism detection.
9. Testing and Optimization:
 Includes thorough testing of the implemented features to ensure
correctness, robustness, and performance under various scenarios.
 Optimizes the code and algorithms for efficiency, memory usage, and
scalability, enhancing the system's responsiveness and scalability.
10. Documentation and Deployment:
 Provides comprehensive documentation, including user guides, API
references, and technical specifications, to facilitate effective usage of the
plagiarism checker.
 Deploys the system to production servers or cloud platforms, ensuring
availability, security, and scalability for users worldwide.
11. Beta Testing and Feedback:
 Conducts beta testing with a select group of users to gather feedback and
identify usability issues, ensuring that the system meets users' needs and
expectations.
12. Marketing and Promotion:
 Promotes the launch of the plagiarism checker through various channels
such as social media, blogs, press releases, and online communities, to create
awareness and drive user adoption.

6
1.2 Definition of problem
Requirement Analysis
The project's key requirements include support for various file formats (e.g., .txt, .docx),
flexibility in choosing similarity metrics (e.g., cosine similarity, Jaccard similarity), and
options for user interaction (e.g., command-line interface, graphical user interface).
Understanding these requirements is crucial for designing a system that meets users' needs
effectively.
Scope Definition
The scope of the project encompasses identifying the target audience (e.g., educational
institutions, writers, publishers), potential use cases (e.g., checking student assignments,
verifying research papers, detecting plagiarism in online content), and limitations (e.g.,
inability to detect paraphrasing, challenges in handling non-textual content). Clearly defining
the scope helps in focusing the project's efforts and resources appropriately.
Resource Allocation
Allocating resources such as development team members proficient in Python programming,
selecting suitable libraries and frameworks, and setting up development environments are
essential steps in ensuring the project's success. Adequate resource allocation ensures that the
project progresses smoothly and meets its objectives within the specified timeframe.
Objectives

1. To Document System Development: Provide a comprehensive overview of the

development process of the Online Flight Booking System, detailing the stages from
conception to implementation.
2. To Highlight Key Features: Outline the key features and functionalities of the system,
including user authentication, flight search and filtering, booking management, and
administrative dashboard.
3. To Discuss Technical Challenges: Identify and discuss the technical challenges
encountered during the development process, such as integrating real-time flight
availability data and implementing secure payment gateway integration.
4. To Evaluate User Experience: Assess the user experience of the system, including
interface design, usability, and responsiveness across different devices and screen sizes.
5. To Analyze System Performance: Evaluate the performance of the Online Flight Booking
System in terms of speed, reliability, and scalability, considering factors such as database
management, server load, and response times.
6. To Address Security Concerns: Discuss the security measures implemented to protect
sensitive user data, including encryption protocols, secure payment transactions, and
compliance with industry standards such as PCI DSS.
7. To Propose Future Enhancements: Suggest potential enhancements or additional features
for the system based on user feedback, emerging technologies, and industry trends.
8. To Provide Recommendations: Offer recommendations for stakeholders, including
administrators, developers, and users, on how to optimize system functionality, improve
7
user experience, and address any identified shortcomings.

8
2. METHODOLOGY

2.1 Proposed Work

1. User Interface and Experience (UI/UX) Design:

 Develop an intuitive and visually appealing interface that allows users to book
tickets easily.

 Ensure the platform is accessible across multiple devices, including desktops,

tablets, and mobile phones.

2. User Interface Refinement:

 Conduct user experience research and gather feedback to identify areas of

improvement in the system's interface.

 Refine the user interface design to enhance usability, accessibility, and overall
user satisfaction.

 Implement user-centric design principles and best practices to streamline the

booking process and improve navigation.

3. Enhanced Search and Filtering:

 Integrate advanced search and filtering options, such as flexible date searches,
multi-city itineraries, and fare comparison tools.

 Implement predictive search functionality and intelligent recommendation

systems to assist users in finding the most relevant flight options.

4. Support and Assistance:

 Develop a customer support system to assist users with booking-related issues,

cancellations, and changes.

 Provide multiple channels for support, such as chat, email, and phone.

5. Admin and Management Dashboard:

 Create a dashboard for railway operators to manage bookings, track seat

9
 occupancy, and monitor system performance.

 Include reporting and analytics features to help operators make data-driven

decisions.

2.2 Block diagram:-

Workflow Diagram

10
2.2.1 Use Case Diagram

11
 3. SOFTWARE AND HARDWARE REQUIREMENTS

3.1 Software Requirements

 LANGUAGE : Python , HTML , CSS

 ENVIRONMENT : Xampp, Django

 DATABASE : MySql

 SERVER : Apache

 BROWSER : Any of Mozilla, Chrome

3.2 Hardware Requirements

 PROCESSOR : INTEL PENTIUM 4 (OR)HIGHER

 RAM : 512 MB & ABOVE

 HARD DISK DRIVE : 500 MB FREE SPACE OR ABOVE

12
4. Design

 Architecture Design
The architecture of the plagiarism checker system consists of several key components,
including text preprocessing, similarity comparison, threshold setting, user interface, and
report generation. Each component plays a crucial role in the overall functionality of the
system and must be designed to interact seamlessly with other modules.

 User Interface Design

Designing a user-friendly interface is essential for ensuring that users can interact with the
plagiarism checker efficiently. Whether it's a command-line interface (CLI) or a graphical
user interface (GUI), the design should prioritize simplicity, intuitiveness, and
accessibility. Providing clear options for selecting input files, setting similarity thresholds,
and viewing reports enhances the user experience.

 Algorithm Selection
Choosing appropriate algorithms for similarity comparison is critical for the accuracy and
efficiency of the plagiarism detection system. Commonly used algorithms such as cosine
similarity, Jaccard similarity, and Levenshtein distance offer different approaches to
measuring similarity between documents. Selecting the most suitable algorithms based on
the project's requirements and constraints is key to achieving reliable results.

 Implementation
The implementation phase involves translating the design specifications into working
code. Developing modules for text preprocessing, similarity comparison, threshold setting,
user interface, and report generation requires attention to detail and adherence to best
practices in software development. Writing clean, modular, and well-documented code
ensures that the system is robust, maintainable, and scalable.

 Testing
Thorough testing is essential for validating the correctness, reliability, and performance of
the plagiarism checker system. Test cases should cover various scenarios, including
different file formats, input sizes, similarity thresholds, and edge cases. Automated testing
frameworks and manual testing techniques help identify and address any bugs or issues
early in the development process.

 Optimization
Optimizing the code and algorithms for efficiency, memory usage, and scalability is
13
 crucial for ensuring that the plagiarism checker can handle large volumes of text data
efficiently. Performance profiling, code refactoring, and algorithmic optimizations can
help improve the system's responsiveness and scalability, enhancing the overall user
experience.

 Launching
Beta Testing
Conducting beta testing with a select group of users allows for gathering feedback,
identifying usability issues, and validating the system's functionality in real-world
scenarios. Beta testers can provide valuable insights that help refine the user interface,
improve algorithm performance, and address any remaining bugs or glitches before the
official launch.

 Documentation
Preparing comprehensive documentation, including user guides, API references, and
technical specifications, is essential for ensuring that users can effectively utilize the
plagiarism checker system. Clear and detailed documentation helps users understand the
system's features, functionalities, and usage guidelines, thereby maximizing its utility and
value.

 Deployment
Deploying the plagiarism checker system to production servers or cloud platforms
involves setting up the necessary infrastructure, configuring deployment pipelines, and
ensuring system reliability, security, and scalability. Continuous monitoring and
maintenance are essential for addressing any issues that may arise post-deployment and
ensuring uninterrupted access to the system for users.

 Marketing
Promoting the launch of the plagiarism checker through various channels, including social
media, blogs, press releases, and online communities, helps create awareness, generate
interest, and attract users. Highlighting the system's features, benefits, and advantages over
existing solutions can effectively position it in the market and drive user adoption.

 Project Outcome
The Plagiarism Checker project in Python aims to deliver a robust, user-friendly, and
efficient system for detecting plagiarism in text documents. By leveraging advanced
algorithms, intuitive user interfaces, and comprehensive documentation, the project seeks
to empower educators, researchers, and content creators in maintaining academic integrity,
upholding professional standards, and protecting intellectual property rights.

14
SNAPSHOTS:-

15
16
5. CONCLUSIONS

The Plagiarism Checker project represents a significant endeavor to address the pervasive
issue of plagiarism through innovative technology solutions. By following a systematic
approach encompassing planning, design, development, launching, and ongoing refinement,
the project aims to deliver a valuable tool that enhances academic integrity, promotes
originality, and fosters a culture of ethical writing and research. With a focus on usability,
accuracy, and reliability, the plagiarism checker system in Python aspires to make a
meaningful contribution to the academic and professional communities worldwide.
By following a systematic approach encompassing planning, design, development,
launching, and ongoing refinement, the project aims to deliver a valuable tool that enhances
academic integrity, promotes originality, and fosters a culture of ethical writing and
research. With a focus on usability, accuracy, and reliability, the plagiarism checker system
in Python aspires to make a meaningful contribution to the academic and professional
communities worldwide.

17
6. BIBLIOGRAPHY

[1] Herbert Scheldt, Python Complete Reference, Fifth Edition, Tata McGraw Hill Edition.

[2] Phil Hanna, Django 2.0: The Complete Reference, Tata McGraw Hill Edition, 2003.

[3] Elmarsi and Navathe, Fundamentals of Database System (Third Edition), Addision Wesley.

[4] Ian Somerville, Software Engineering, Third Edition, Pearson Education.

[5] Ali Bahrami, Object-Oriented System Development, Third Edition, Tata McGraw Hill
Edition.

[6] Ivan Bayross, SQL, PL/SQL programming language of Oracle, Second Edition, BPB
Publication.

18