Unit 7
Unit 7
Unit 7
Course contents
A term closely associated with assessment is psychological test, which Anastasi and Urbina (1997)
defined as an objective and standardized measure of a sample of behavior. Cronbach’s (1990) definition
is similar, with a test being a systematic procedure for observing behavior and describing it with the aid of
numerical scales or fixed categories. As these two similar definitions suggest, there are some
commonalities among all the definitions of assessment. They all discuss getting a measure or using some
type of measurement. In assessment, counselors often want an indication of quantity (e.g., How depressed
is the client? Are the test scores high enough to get into Harvard?). In simple terms, many test questions
are related to whether there is a lot of “something” or just a little. In counseling, practitioners are often
interested in human constructs such as emotions, intelligence, personality factors, self-esteem, and
aptitudes. These constructs, however, cannot be directly measured. For example, individuals cannot give
a pint of emotions in the same way they can give a pint of blood. Humans, for the most part, indicate their
emotions by their behavior, their statements, or even the answers they give on a questionnaire.
It is important to remember that speaking and responding to a questionnaire are behaviors. When working
with clients, a counselor must consider this sample of behavior and then reflect on two important
questions: first, is the sample of behavior indicative of how the person usually behaves, and second, are
the inferences being made correct?
Psychological assessment is similar to psychological testing but usually involves a more comprehensive
assessment of the individual. Psychological assessment is a process that involves the integration of
information from multiple sources, such as tests of normal and abnormal personality, tests of ability or
intelligence, tests of interests or attitudes, as well as information from personal interviews. Collateral
information is also collected about personal, occupational, or medical history, such as from records or
from interviews with parents, spouses, teachers, or previous therapists or physicians. A psychological test
is one of the sources of data used within the process of assessment; usually more than one test is used.
Many psychologists do some level of assessment when providing services to clients or patients, and may
use for example, simple checklists to assess some traits or symptoms, but psychological assessment is a
more complex, detailed, in-depth process. Typical types of focus for psychological assessment are to
provide a diagnosis for treatment settings; to assess a particular area of functioning or disability often for
school settings; to help select type of treatment or to assess treatment outcomes; to help courts decide
issues such as child custody or competency to stand trial; or to help assess job applicants or employees
and provide career development counseling or training.
A distinction is there in assessment and testing given by AERA, APA and NCME (1999). It defines
assessment as a broader term referring to a process that integrates test information with information from
other sources e.g., from schools, hospitals etc.
Difference between Psychological Assessment and Psychological Testing
Historically, testing and assessment have been important foundations of counseling and applied
psychology. Tests have important roles both as tools to facilitate the goals of counseling and for
assessment.
Interview Conversation
Purpose of interview is clear Purpose is not clear
Rapport and relationship establishment is No need for any rapport
essential
Recording of information in some form is No recording is required
required
Validity of interview is assessed Validity of conversation not assessed
Role of interviewee and interviewer is No assignment of roles
assigned
The interview is probably the most commonly used assessment tool. Counselors use interview
method to help gather information about clients and clarify results of other assessments.
Assessors must be appropriately trained. Their skills and experience are essential for the
interviewee.
i. Verbal and face-to-face: what does the client tell you? How much information are they
willing/able to provide?
ii. Para-verbal: how does the client speak? At normal pace, tone, volume, inflection? What
is their command on language, how well do they choose their words? Do they pick up on
non-verbal cues for speech and turn taking? How organized is their speech?
iii. Situation: Is the client cooperative? Is their participation voluntary? For what purpose is
the interview conducted? Where is the interview conducted?
Characteristics of Interview
To understand the basic concept and characteristics we will discuss some essential features of
interview. 1) Attitude of interviewer and interviewee If the interviewer is understanding and
genuine then it is likely that the interview will be more valid. Also as pointed out by some
experts, communication and assessment are important functions of interviewer. It is the
responsibility of the interviewer to direct and continue interactions. The interviewer should be
an expert in this field. Many times clients do not return for a second session and this may be
related to the interviewer’s skills. For example, while taking case history if the counselor is
understanding and genuine in interaction with the client, the latter will be more comfortable
and will become less inhibited and thus open up with the concerned problems personal and
impersonal, in the interview situation. On the other hand if the client senses that the counsellor
does not understand the problem and appears insensitive, then the counselee may refuse to
part with much of the information relating to the problem and thus will leave the counselling
session half way and leave. Thus the climate built during the interview influences the degree of
client’s willingness to disclose personal information (Whiston, 2009). If the interviewer has to
obtain the required information from the interviewee then it is essential that the counselor
establishes adequate rapport with the client. Interviewee should have the ability to
communicate, translate the emotions and thoughts into words and organised thoughts. The
client is expected to be cooperative. 2) Proper atmosphere In order to help client feel
comfortable, the counselor has to create a congenial atmosphere both physical and emotional.
Physically the room should be pleasant, well aired, with privacy indicating that the client can talk
whatever comes to mind without any hesitation. In the interview, the counselor should avoid
certain questions which may cause embarrassment to the client. So also the counselor should
avoid certain responses that may put off the client and make the client clamp up. In fact the
interview should be smooth and not probing or inquisitive that might also put off the client. For
example if the person who is interviewing is found to be probing, hostile or judgmental then
obviously client will not feel comfortable and thus withhold the needed information. It is very
essential to be sensitive to the feelings of the client during the interview. Also if during the
interview the interviewer tries to give false assurance then that may make the other person
uncomfortable. This will also decrease the respect for the person who is interviewing the
person. It is not always necessary that people seek some solution when they are mentioning
their problems to someone. The responses of criticism, arguments, and authoritarian approach
etc., should be avoided. 3) Interviewer’s effective response Some responses that are
encouraging are required. Interviewer should serve as an understanding listener, allowing client
to talk freely, treat what is being said in its context, and ask questions only at appropriate times.
Open ended questions are more effective in the interview. It is important that the interviewer
keeps aside the biases and conducts the interview. One may not necessarily agree to the
content of the material that is produced in the interview, nevertrheless, the interviewer should
encourage the client to continue what he or she was saying keep the conversational flow going.
4) Measuring understanding A great deal of research has been carried out by Carl Rogers in this
regard. He has analysed the responses that are given by the client to classify them on five levels.
The basis for this is the empathy by that person. If the person has more empathy then it is likely
that he will have higher level of understanding of the client and his or her problems. Level 3 and
2 are adequate for conducting the unstructured and semistructred interview. 5) Recoding
responses Responses of client should be taken in some form. It can be taken in detail writing
while interview is in progress. It has an important advantage in that the client may feel that
whatever is being conveyed by him/her appears important as whatever the client says is being
recorded by the interviewer. This encourages the client to part with more and also in depth
information. If whatever the client says is not noted down immediately, the possibility of the
counselor distorting or forgetting certain information that the client gave is high and this can be
avoided by writing it immediately. However, writing down the information immediately has also
certain disadvantages and these include the cutting the flow of communication by the client.
Recording can also be through electronic devices. In such recording a microphone is placed in
front of the client with the client’s permission. Yet, such a device which is recording all that the
client wants to convey may make the client feel uncomfortable and thus the client may not be
as uninhibited and free as he or she would have been otherwise. Hence the interviewer /
counsellor should make sure that the client not only has no objection for recording the narration
but will not feel uncomfortable to talk freely. Ethically too this prior permission for recording is a
must. Also it must be ensured that the client if need be should get a choice to put off the
recording which is considered by the client as confidential. If the counselor chooses to write
down whatever is being told by the client, the same may be done by noting down points and not
verbatim or in detail. 6) Interveiw is different from communication The interactions of two or
more people in the interview session are very different from communication. As mentioned
earlier, Interview is interaction with purpose. Communication may not have any purpose. It
starts anywhere and stops anytime because of lack of purpose. In interview the role of
interviewer and interviewee is specified. Interviewer has the responsibility to continue the
interview and also direct the interview
Types
There can be two types of interviews: Structured and Unstructured.
That is, the interview can range from being totally unplanned i.e., unstructured to carefully
designed i.e., completely structured.
Structured Interview:
The most structured interviews have characteristics such as standardized questions,
trained interviewers, specific question order, controlled length of time, and a standardized
response evaluation format. A structured interview will be more reliable and valid. It is
designed to provide a diagnosis for a client by detailed questioning of the client in a
“yes/no” or “definitely/somewhat/not at all” forced choice format. It is broken up into
different sections reflecting the diagnosis in question. Often Structured interviews use
closed questions, which require a simple pre-determined answer. Examples of closed
questions are “When did this problem begin? Was there any particular stressor going on
at that time? Can you tell me about how this problem started?” Closed interviews are
better suited for specific information gathering.
Unstructured Interview:
Interviews can also be less structured and allow the client more control over the topic and
direction of the interview. Unstructured interviews are better suited for general
information gathering. Unstructured interviews often use open questions, which ask for
more explanation and elaboration on the part of the client. Examples of open questions
are “What was happening in your life when this problem started? How did you feel then?
How did this all start?”
Major functions of interview method are:
Description: Interview has been found to be particularly useful in providing insight into
the interactive quality of social life. The verbal interaction enables the interviewer in
understanding how people view the subject under investigation.
Exploration: In this the interviewer tries to explore some new variable for study as it
also helps in conceptual clarity. A review of the work done in the related area also is
taken into account.
The advantage of interview method is that it allows greater flexibility in the process of
questioning. It facilitates the counselor in obtaining the desired information.
b) Observation Method
Observation method is a fundamental technique of the data collection. It refers to watching and
listening to the behavior of the client over time without manipulating and controlling it. It also
records findings in ways that allow some degree of analytic interpretation and discussion. Thus,
observation involves broadly selecting, recording and coding behavior; therefore, it is scientific.
It tells us, how does the person act – nervous, calm, smug? What do they do and not do? Do they
make and maintain eye contact? How close to you do they sit? Often, some of the most important
information you can gather from the observation of behavior. Behavioral observations may be
used clinically (such as to add to interview information or to assess results of treatment).
Naturalistic observation
Structured observation
Unstructured observation
Participative observation
Naturalistic observation: Naturalistic observation is particularly good for observing specific
subjects. It provides ecologically valid recordings of natural behavior. Spontaneous behaviors are
more likely to happen.
Structured observation: Allows control of extraneous factors and the reliability of results can be
tested by repeating the study. It provides a safe environment to study contentious concepts such
as infant attachment.
Unstructured observation: Gives a broad overview of a situation. Useful where
situation/subject matter to be studied is unclear.
Participant observation: Gives an “insiders” view. Behaviors are less prone to misinterpretation
because researcher is a participant. It provides opportunity for the researcher to become an
“accepted” part of the environment.
The advantages of the observation method are that it removes any kind of artificiality. It is one of
the valid forms of assessment as it is direct and capable of analyzing the situation or behavior of
the client.
c) Case Study Method
A case study is an in-depth investigation/analysis of a single person. Counselor uses case study to
investigate in detail a specific situation or person. Case studies are often used in clinical cases or
in situations when lab research is not possible or practical. Typically, data are gathered from a
variety of sources and by using several different methods. Experiments, interviews,
questionnaires, observations, diaries, and psychometric tests can all be used within a case study.
Case study can be based on an individual, a family, a social group, event, or series of events. The
case study research method originated in clinical medicine (the case history, i.e., the patient’s
personal history - idiographic method).
The case study method often involves simply observing what happens to, or reconstructing ‘the
case history’ of a single participant or group of individuals (such as a school class or a specific
social group). Case studies allow a counselor to investigate a topic in far more detail than might
be possible if they were trying to deal with a large number of research participants.
Therefore, it has advantages as case study method provides sufficient basal factors of the client
on which opinion can be drawn easily.
Socio-Economic status: The income of the family, the place where they live, the
kind of work that they do, the kind of status they have in the community in
which they live, and many such related aspects are important to understand. •
Relationship with Parents: This is especially very important when we are dealing
with adolescents problems. Family is the first and important unit in the person’s
life. This shapes many relations in life. This can be asked to the client and should
be confirmed with the parents also. Because it may happen that the client
perceives his parents in a misconstrued manner and thus forms an image of
them as supportive or non supportive towards self. This perception maybe quite
different from the one that is factual in that the parents may not be at all as the
client perceives them but may be doing things with good intention. Exactly
opposite may also happen, that is, a person may have a false image of his
parents. So in both the cases it is very important that we confirm it with reliable
source of information. • Interpersonal Relationship: (within family): This is an
important aspect of the family dynamics. How the family members relate to
each other is important. The client may not be the victim of the conflict, but he
may witness it with some other family members. So this becomes important to
see, how much the emotional tie is strong with the family in case of the client
Psychological Examination
In the following format, the test that has been used for the assessment can be mentioned in an
organised manner. This gives us quick understanding in summary of the test administered
• Integrated Note (with theoretical base): This is the summary of the interview that is conducted by the
clinician so far. This leads to a diagnosis. These are usually the positive findings that support the
diagnosis. • Diagnosis: This is the final understanding about the client. According to the classification
system that the counselor follows, he will diagnose the client. There are two widely used systems as we
know. One is DSM IV and other is ICD-10. Since counseling is for normal people above two systems are
not used. In counseling different classification is used such as study problem, adjustment problem,
negative self concept etc. So with the help of the case history and the Mental Status Examination the
client is diagnosed. Diagnosis helps to know symptoms, etiology and therapy planning. • Prognosis: This
gives us a clear understanding of what are the chances of recovery. There are few factors which are
asset for recovery while some are negative. Counsellor considers good and bad factors and decides the
probability of recovery of problem.
Counseling Design
• Choice of therapy: After understanding all the essential aspects of the client’s problem this is the time
to actually do the intervention. The problem that the client is facing can be treated in different ways. It is
the skill of the counselor to convey to the client what he has understood about him in the language that
the client understands. At this stage with the mutual convenience of the client and the counselor the
further contracting for his therapy or counseling is done, the counselor shares this with the client. If
there is any need to involve someone in the counselling process in addition to the client, that may be
conveyed to the client and to the family member who is to be involved in the programme.
d) Psychological testing
Psychological testing is a field characterized by the use of samples of behavior in order to assess
psychological construct(s), such as cognitive and emotional functioning, about a given individual.
The technical term for the science behind psychological testing is psychometrics. By samples of
behavior, one means observations of an individual performing tasks that have usually been
prescribed beforehand, which often means scores on a test. These responses are often compiled
into statistical tables that allow the evaluator to compare the behavior of the individual being
tested to the responses of a norm group.
Psychological tests are written, visual, or verbal evaluations administered to assess the cognitive
and emotional functioning of children and adults. It is “an objective and standardized measure of
a sample of behavior.” Psychological testing is a standard procedure of measurement designed to
measure characteristics, abilities, personality, etc. They are used to measure the quantified
characteristics and have standards.
Personality tests are administered for a wide variety of reasons, from diagnosing psychopathology
(e.g., personality disorder, depressive disorder) to screening job candidates. They may be used in
an educational setting to determine personality strengths and weaknesses.
Tests are thus used in the selection, classification, diagnosis, prediction. The counselor makes use
of it to determine client’s behavior, know her/his personality and help the client in making
educational and vocational planning.
In short it can be said that the psychological tests are formalized measures of mental functioning.
Most are objective and quantifiable; however, certain projective tests may involve some level of
subjective interpretation. Also known as inventories, measurements, questionnaires, and scales,
psychological tests are administered in a variety of settings, including preschools, primary and
secondary schools, colleges and universities, hospitals, healthcare settings, and social agencies.
They come in a variety of formats, including written, verbal, and computer administered.
A test used in counseling / guidance or for training and development is considered good if the
following can be said about it: -
1. The test measures what it claims to measure. For example, a test of mental ability does in
fact measure mental ability and not some other characteristic.
2. The test measures what it claims to measure consistently or reliably. This means that if a
person were to take the test again, the person would get a similar test score.
3. The test is purpose-relevant. In other words, the test measures one or more characteristics
that are important to specific career decisions or for predicting or monitoring training and
development outcomes.
4. By using the test, more effective decisions can be made by and about individuals. For
example, an interest inventory helps you to guide a client toward careers in which he or
she is more likely to be satisfied. A mechanical aptitude test may help you predict who
would benefit from mechanical training.
Thus, a good test is both reliable and valid, and has good norms. Test reliability and validity are
two technical properties of a test that indicate the quality and usefulness of the test. These are the
two most important features of a test. The counselor should examine these features when
evaluating the suitability of the test. Reliability refers to the consistency of the test results.
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it says it does. Norms are designed to tell you
what the result of measurement (a number) means in relation to other results (numbers).
The “normative sample” should be very representative of the sample of people who will be given
the test. Thus, if a test is to be used on the general population, the normative sample should be
large, include people from ethnically and culturally diverse backgrounds, and include people from
all levels of income and educational status.
A good psychological test is thus a standardized test with a manual which gives complete
information about the development of the test, administration, scoring and interpretation of the
results.
However, whenever you use a psychological test, you should keep in mind a few things.