NAME: ERMA R.
ESTILLORE SUBJECT: ED201
INSTRUCTOR: LUZVIMINDA T. ORILLA DATE SUBMITTED: 7/15/23
FINAL EXAMINATION
CORRELATION ANALYSIS
PROBLEM 2
Given TWO DATASETS:
A. ONLINE LEARNING SUPPORT (Survey Output)
AUTHENTIC TEACHING APPROACH INTERACTION/COLLABORATION PERSONAL RELEVANCE
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 OVERALL Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 OVERALL Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 OVERALL
3 3 4 3 3 3.2 3 3 4 3 3 4 3.33 4 4 5 5 4 4.4
3 4 4 4 4 3.8 3 3 3 4 3 3 3.17 5 4 5 4 4 4.4
5 4 4 4 5 4.4 4 4 4 3 4 3 3.67 2 4 2 2 2 2.4
4 3 4 4 3 3.6 5 5 5 4 4 4 4.50 3 4 3 4 3 3.4
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 5 5 5 5 4.8 4 5 5 5 4 5 4.67 5 4 4 3 5 4.2
3 4 4 4 4 3.8 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.00 4 4 4 4 4 4
5 3 3 5 5 4.2 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.00 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 3 3 4 3.6 5 5 4 4 3 3 4.00 5 2 3 3 2 3
5 5 4 5 4 4.6 4 3 4 4 3 4 3.67 4 4 4 3 3 3.6
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 4.50 4 4 5 5 4 4.4
4 4 4 4 3 3.8 5 5 4 4 5 4 4.50 4 4 3 2 3 3.2
4 4 4 5 4 4.2 4 4 4 4 4 4 4.00 4 4 4 4 5 4.2
4 5 5 5 5 4.8 3 3 5 4 5 5 4.17 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4.83 5 4 5 5 5 4.8
4 3 4 3 4 3.6 4 4 4 4 3 4 3.83 4 4 4 4 4 4
3 5 5 5 5 4.6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00 3 4 4 4 4 3.8
5 5 5 5 4 4.8 4 5 4 4 5 4 4.33 3 3 4 4 4 3.6
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 4 3 4 4 4 3.83 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00 5 5 5 5 5 5
4 4 3 4 3 3.6 2 4 4 2 4 4 3.33 5 4 4 3 3 3.8
5 5 5 5 5 5 4 5 4 4 5 5 4.50 5 5 5 5 5 5
5 4 4 5 3 4.2 5 5 5 5 4 5 4.83 5 4 5 4 4 4.4
5 4 4 5 5 4.6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5.00 3 4 3 3 3 3.2
4 3 3 3 4 3.4 3 4 4 4 4 4 3.83 4 4 4 4 4 4
4 4 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 3 3 3 3.00 4 4 4 4 4 4
TOTAL 131.6 TOTAL 127.50 TOTAL 126.8
Table 1 shows the online learning support survey output and their mean
Table 2 Shows the Student Satisfaction (Survey Output) and its Mean
STUDENT SATISFACTION
Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q5 Q6 Q7 Q8 Q9 OVERALL
1 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 4 3.11
2 4 4 4 4 3 3 3 4 4 3.67
3 3 5 3 2 4 5 5 5 5 4.11
4 5 4 4 3 4 3 4 4 4 3.89
5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
6 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
7 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
8 4 4 4 4 3 4 5 5 5 4.22
9 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
10 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
11 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
12 3 3 2 4 4 4 5 5 4 3.78
13 4 4 4 4 4 4 3 4 4 3.89
14 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
15 4 4 5 3 3 5 5 5 4 4.22
16 5 4 4 4 4 4 4 5 5 4.33
17 4 5 5 4 5 5 5 5 5 4.78
18 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
19 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3 3
20 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
21 5 5 5 4 4 4 5 4 5 4.56
22 5 5 3 5 5 5 5 5 5 4.78
23 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
24 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
25 3 3 4 3 4 3 2 2 3 3
26 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
27 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5 5
28 5 4 4 4 5 5 5 5 5 4.67
29 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
30 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4
TOTAL 131
ANSWER SHEET
Using these datasets, you perform a CORRELATION ANALYSIS using the guide
questions below:
1. What is the value of the Pearson r? refer to table 3
2. Is there a significant relationship between the online learning support and student
satisfaction? Determine whether the correlation is significant using an =0.05.
3. Fill-in the table below and provided discussion.
Table 3. Correlation Matrix of the online learning support and student satisfaction,
n=30
Online Learning Support
Authentic
Teaching Interaction/Collaboration Personal Relevance OVERALL
Support
Student
Satisfaction 0.82 0.796610093 0.398445612 0.832219
*p<0.05
Using =0.05, determine if there is a significant correlation between student
satisfaction and online learning support. Following the five (5) step procedure in
Using hypothesis testing, we have:
STEP 1. State the Hypothesis
Ho: r =0; (The correlation is zero or there is no significant correlation between
the student satisfaction and online learning support.
H1: r 0; (The correlation is not equal to zero or there is a significant correlation
between the student satisfaction and online learning support.
Step 2. Specify the Decision Rule
Degrees of freedom n1+n2-2. Using the t-distribution table, with = 0.05 and 58 df, the
tcrit=2.0017
STEP 3. Calculate the test Statistic
𝒏−𝟐
𝒕𝒄𝒂𝒍 = 𝒓√
𝟏 − 𝒓𝟐
30 − 2
𝒕𝒄𝒂𝒍 = 0.832219√
1 − (0.832219)2
28 28
= 0.832219√ = 0.832219√ = 0.832219√91.21
1 − 0.693 0.307
= 0.0832219(9.550) 𝒕𝒄𝒂𝒍= 7.948
STEP 4. Make a decision
Since the 𝒕𝒄𝒂𝒍= 7.948 is greater than the critical t-value (t = 2.0017), hence,
crit
we reject the null hypothesis that the correlation is zero.
In summary, the calculated t-value exceeded the required value for significance
at the 0.05 probability level. This will led us to say that there exist a real correlation
between student satisfaction and online learning support.
STEP 5. Interpretation
This means that there is a significant relationship between the online learning
support and student satisfaction
Table 4. Overall analysis of online learning support and student satisfaction, n=30
Online Learning Support
R-value Significance(P) Null
=0.05 Hypothesis
Student CV: 7.948
Satisfaction REJECT THE NULL
0.832219 TV: 2.0017
HYPOTHESIS
PV= 0.000
Table 4. Correlation of authentic teaching approach and student satisfaction
Authentic Teaching Approach Student satisfaction
Authentic Teaching Approach 1 0.82
Student satisfaction 0.82 1
Table 5. Correlation of interaction/collaboration and student satisfaction
Interaction/Collaboration Student satisfaction
Interaction/Collaboration 1 0.796610093
Student satisfaction 0.796610093 1
Table 6. Correlation of personal relevance and student satisfaction
Personal Relevance Student satisfaction
Personal Relevance 1 0.398445612
Student satisfaction 0.398445612 1
Table 7. Correlation of online learning support and student satisfaction
online learning Student satisfaction
Online learning support 1 0.8322
Student satisfaction 0.8322 1
Discussion
Reflected in Table 4 is the correlation matrix of the student satisfaction and
online learning support. The result revealed a (positive, negative) and (significant, not
significant) relationship between the student satisfaction and online learning support (r=
0.832219 or [low, moderate, high, very high] correlation) and the hypothesis was tested
at 0.05 level of significance. Hence, the (rejection, non- rejection) of the null hypothesis.
