Food Habits of Certain Colombian Bats
Food Habits of Certain Colombian Bats
Food Habits of Certain Colombian Bats
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .
http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.
JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range of
content in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new forms
of scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
American Society of Mammalogists is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to
Journal of Mammalogy.
http://www.jstor.org
TABLE 1.-Stomach contents of 180 Neotropical bats taken in the Departamento del Valle
del Cauca, Colombia, July and August, 1964.
Number
ex- Matted hair, Not
Species amined Plants Insects claws, flesh Blood identifiable
rule out incidental ingestion during grooming activities. Though isolated claws are not
very diagnostic, those found in Carollia were indistinguishable from those of the same
species. Whether these instances of cannibalism represent direct predation within the
roosts or eating of young or dead animals is not known. The size of the claws did not sug-
gest a young animal, however.
Carollia is generally considered to be an obligate fruit eater. Goodwin and Greenhall
(1961) listed a large variety of fruits (22 species) eaten by Carollia. Most other reports
are general, referring to bananas and other cultivated fruits, or simply stating that Carollia
subsists on "variousfruits." In actuality, little detailed work has been done on phyllostoma-
tid food habits. Most of the work that has been done is observational,which, though impor-
tant, should be balanced with stomach content analysis. Insects taken in flight and less
frequently eaten foods may be overlooked in purely observationalstudies.
As reported previously (Carvalho, 1961), Glossophaga also feeds on insects to some
extent. The large size of the insects encountered suggests that they were taken as food and
not as incidental captures associated with nectar feeding as suggested by Goodwin and
Greenhall (1961). In any case, the small size of an insect found in a bat stomach is not a
valid indicator of accidental ingestion, as Ross (1961) has shown that even obligate insecti-
vores such as Tadarida feed on insects between 5 and 9 mm in total length. A single
individual also contained matted hair still attached to flesh. Carnivorous behavior in
Glossophaga is unreported and unexpected.
Although all Desmodus stomachs contained blood, several contained insect remains and
muscle fibers. The muscle fibers were in chunks (5 mm and more), as though taken in a
single bite and bolted with no mastication. These pieces of flesh were common in the
specimens in which they occurred. Goldman (1920) commented that Desmodus removes
a piece of skin in biting, but the quantity of flesh observed in the stomach contents suggests
that additional pieces of flesh are also ingested, or that a number of initial bites are made.
The insect remains found in Desmodus stomachs consisted of a whole ingested ectoparasite
(not included in Table 1) and well-broken remains of larger insects.
More than a fourth of the 120 phyllostomatids examined contained material other than
plant. This high proportionis not dependent upon the incidence in any one form, as seven
of the 10 species contained insects or flesh. Rather, those that contained only plant material
in their stomachs were represented by too few specimens to warrant any conclusion. These
large frequencies of insect and bat material in the stomach contents of bats that we have
casually considered to be obligate fruit eaters suggest the need for more studies on the
habits of these animals. Of particular importance would be the study of seasonal and
geographic trends in food habits.
As most phylogenetic interpretationsof chiropteran evolution suggest that ancestral bats
(and more specifically, phyllostomatids) were insectivorous, it is possible that dietic re-
quirements from early habits are still operative in forms that have otherwise adapted to
a different mode of life.
In addition to the purely biological interest in the food habits of these animals, the
increased interest in bats, particularly tropical forms, in zoonotic epidemiology, requires
more detailed information on their food habits for a more comprehensive knowledge of
their parasitic and microbial associates.
Various aspects of this study were supported in part by grants from the National Science
Foundation (GB 2458) and the National Institutes of Health (TW00143), I.C.M.R.T.
Award.
LITERATURE CITED