Writing Lexicon
Writing Lexicon
Motive: Defined by Gordon Harvey as the “intellectual context” that’s established at the beginning
of a paper to suggest why the thesis is original or worthwhile.*
In both humanistic and scientific disciplines, the motive is typically an incongruity, puzzle, or
surprise in the primary sources or data; and/or holes, limitations, or disagreements in the
secondary literature. All good academic papers have a well-defined motive, which, according to
Harvey, is “usually defined by a form of the complicating word ‘But.’”
Structure: A paper’s line of reasoning, from beginning to end and also within and between
paragraphs.
A successful structure is logical, coherent, and easy to follow. In humanistic disciplines, the
structure allows for a dynamic development of ideas (is not merely a list of points or examples).
In scientific disciplines, the overall structure is typically signaled with subheadings, such as Title,
Abstract, Introduction, Literature Review, Methods, Results, Discussion, and References; within
each section, the structure allows for a logical development of ideas.
Methodology: The methods and strategies used to make an argument or conduct an investigation.
In humanistic disciplines, scholars typically don’t discuss their methodology, except to describe
an analytic framework, but social scientists and scientists always do, whether their projects are
empirical or theoretical. One reason for the difference is that social scientists and scientists value
reproducible results, which are dependent on methodology.
Orienting: Defined by Harvey as “bits of information, explanation, and summary that orient the
reader.” *
The amount of orienting, or context, a writer provides depends on readers’ likely expertise in the
subject. Even experts require some orienting; those with less expertise require more.
Citations: Bibliographic information that enables readers to track down a paper’s sources.
In academic writing, sources are always cited; the citation style employed (e.g., MLA, APA,
CMS, CSE) depends on the discipline. A list of sources is called the Works Cited, Bibliography,
or References, depending on purpose and discipline.
Conventions: The accepted standards of various elements of academic writing, such as paper
format, voice, tone, diction, and citation style.
Academic writing in different disciplines follows distinctive conventions. Should a writer include
a roadmap at the beginning of a paper or divide the paper up into conventional sections? Is the
active or passive voice preferred? May a writer refer to him- or herself in the first-person
singular? Is there a specialized language, or jargon, that the writer should use? Which citation
style is appropriate? Writers can infer answers to these and other questions of convention by
glancing through the most widely read journals in the field—for example, PMLA, Social Science
Research, and Nature—or by reading excellent papers (by students or professionals) distributed
by the professor or graduate student instructor.
*
This lexicon was developed by Kerry Walk, former Director of the Princeton Writing Program,
with assistance from Judith A. Swan, Associate Director for Writing in Science and Engineering
(WSE). The lexicon was inspired and informed by Gordon C. Harvey’s “Elements of the Academic
Essay.”