BL21.WR - RSI.126Rev.1 - STAMP

SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT
FOR
Construction of Villa
Plot no. 56 Sector: MZW11, Zayed City
Al Dhafra Region Abu Dhabi
BL21.WR.RSI.126Rev.1
for
Heirs of Mr. Salem Mohamed Ahmed Alfalahi and Ms. Aysha Salem
Alhamli
Telephone No. : 00971 - 02 - 8840560

Fax No. : 00971 - 02 - 8840570
Reporting Date : 6th October 2021
Date Revision Description Prepared By Checked By Approved By

Engr. Rocelyn Engr. Khaled Engr. Khaled
19th October 2022 1 Geotechnical Report
Gamon Neem Neem
Consultant Name: M/s Zawaya Engineering Consultant
Telephone No. : 00971 - 02 - 8840560

Fax No. : 00971 - 02 - 8840570
Subject : Geotechnical Investigation Report

Owner : Heirs of Mr. Salem Mohamed Ahmed Alfalahi and Ms. Aysha Salem
Alhamli
Project Name : Construction of Villa
Location : Plot no. 56 Sector: MZW11, Zayed City, Al Dhafra Region
Dear Sir,
We are pleased to submit herewith, report of the geotechnical investigation for the above
project. This investigation was carried out according to your approval and issuance of Al Dhafra
Region Municipality Geo-Investigation Permit on 27th September 2021
The content of this report are the results of the field and laboratory investigation, geotechnical
analysis and interpretation of the findings, conclusions, recommendation to aid the design and
construction of the foundations.
In the event that additional information or clarifications are required, please contact our office
at your convenience. We would like to take this opportunity to thank you for your confidence
and look forward to be of service to you in the near future.
Best Regards,
Basalt Laboratories for Soil Testing
Engr. Khaled Neem

(B.S Geology) General Manager
BL21.WR.RSI.126Rev.1 | Page2
List of Contents
1 INTRODUCTION ______________________________________________________ 5
1.1 Purpose of Study _____________________________________________________ 5
1.2 Scope of Work _______________________________________________________ 5
1.3 Standards and Codes of Practice ________________________________________ 5
2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION _________________________________________________ 6
3 SITE DESCRIPTION ____________________________________________________ 6
4 PREVAILING WEATHER CONDITION ______________________________________ 7
5 GENERAL GEOLOGICAL OF THE AREA ____________________________________ 7
6 FIELD WORK ________________________________________________________ 8
6.1 Boreholes ___________________________________________________________ 8
6.2 Sampling of Soil and Rock ______________________________________________ 8
6.3 Standard Penetration Test (SPT) _______________________________________ 8
6.4 Ground Water _______________________________________________________ 9
7 LABORATORY TESTING _________________________________________________ 9
8 SUBSURFACE STRATA AND ANALYSIS ____________________________________ 10
8.1 Ground Conditions ___________________________________________________ 10
9 ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS AND RECOMMENDATION __________________ 11
9.1 General ____________________________________________________________ 11
9.2 Foundation _________________________________________________________ 11
9.2.1 Introduction ________________________________________________________ 11
9.2.2 Shallow Foundation __________________________________________________ 11
9.2.3 Recommendation ____________________________________________________ 12
9.2.4 Recommendation for Ground Slab________________________________________ 12
9.2.5 Recommendation Pavement Type ________________________________________ 12
9.2.5.1 General Consideration for Pavement______________________________________ 13
9.3 Excavations and Slopes ________________________________________________ 14
9.4 Backfilling __________________________________________________________ 14
9.4.1 Structural Fill / Engineering Fill _________________________________________ 14
9.5 FOUNDATION CONCRETE ______________________________________________ 15
10 REPORT LIMITATIONS _________________________________________________ 16
List of Tables
TABLE 1 : PLOT BOUNDARY COORDINATE _______________________________________ 6
TABLE 2 : BOREHOLES, COORDINATES, DEPTHS AND ELEVATIONS ___________________ 8
TABLE 3 : SUMMARY OF GROUNDWATER LEVELS _________________________________ 9
TABLE 4 : LABORATORY TESTING SCHEDULE _____________________________________ 9
TABLE 5 : GENERAL SOIL PROFILE ______________________________________________ 10
TABLE 6 : SUMMARY OF ALLOWABLE BEARING CAPACITIES ________________________ 12
TABLE 7 : SUMMARY OF CHEMICAL ANALYSIS ____________________________________ 15
TABLE 8 : CEMENT TYPE, CEMENT CONTENT & WATER CEMENT RATIO _______________ 15
List of Figures
FIGURE 1 : SITE LOCATION AND ORIENTATION ___________________________________ 6
Appendix
APPENDIX A
FIGURE A1 : Soil Investigation Work Permit
FIGURE A2 : General Site Plan
FIGURE A3 : Site Layout and Location of Boreholes
FIGURE A4 : Demarcation
APPENDIX B
Borehole Logs
Cross Section of Boreholes
Legend of Boreholes
APPENDIX C
Laboratory Test Result
APPENDIX D
Recommendation of Concrete
1 INTRODUCTION
Upon the instructions of M/s Zawaya Engineering Consultant, in their capacity as the
consultant. Geotechnical Investigation was carried out by Basalt Laboratory for Soil Testing
for construction of service block, majlis and electric room for villa according to the request of
Heirs of Mr. Salem Mohamed Ahmed Alfalahi and Ms. Aysha Salem Alhamli
1.1 Purpose of Study
The purpose of the investigation carried out for the above project is:
- Determine the surface and subsurface conditions at the proposed project area
- Provide data and parameters that would assist the engineer in the design of safe
economical foundations and earthworks.
1.2 Scope of Work
The scope of work consists of the following:
 Collecting information and maps particular to the project site such as public services,
site plan and land use maps.
 Conducting site visit to the proposed building site to collect information about present
land use, surface topography, geological features and surface drainage.
 Drilling and sampling of two (2) exploratory boreholes: two (2) boreholes to depth of
20.0m, BGL,
 Collecting soil and water samples for identification and Laboratory testing.
 Carrying out the necessary field and laboratory tests.
 Reporting and providing conclusions and recommendations.
1.3 Standards and Codes of Practice
Unless otherwise specified in this document, all equipment’s, materials and procedures
associated with this work comply with current editions of following relevant Standards and
Codes of Practice.
 BS 5930: 2015 - “Code of Practice for Site Investigation”

 BS 1377- 2:1990 - “Methods of Test for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes”
 ACI 318-11 - “Building Code Requirements for Structural Concrete and Commentary”

2 PROJECT DESCRIPTION
As per the information’s and drawings provided by client, the proposed project under this
investigation will consist of service block, majlis, electric room ground floor, first floor, and
roof for villa
3 SITE DESCRIPTION
As per the key plan in Appendix A, the site is located at Plot no. 56 Sector: MZW11, Zayed City,
Al Dhafra Region Abu Dhabi.
Table no. 1
Below Plot Boundaries Coordinates
Coordinates*
No.
Easting (E) Northing (N)
P1 775854.790 2617607.845
P2 775886.717 2617534.469
P3 775845.478 2617516.489
P4 775813.551 2617589.866
*Coordinates based on WGS84 system.
The surface topography almost flat (0.0m to 1.2m) from the adjacent paved road level.
The location and orientation of the site presented in figure 1 below.
Figure 1: Site Location and Orientation
4 PREVAILING WEATHER CONDITION
The site located at Zayed City, which is part of the coastal plain of UAE along the Arabian Gulf,
where a hot climate prevails. A hot arid climate is one where evaporation exceeds precipitation
such as rain and dewfall. This climate regime produces characteristic hot dessert terrains. Average
annual rainfall may only be a few centimeters (even only a few millimeters in some parts) which
usually occur seasonally and sometimes only form a single cloudburst. Winter shade temperatures
are frequently in excess 20°C and humidity may be around 100% near the coast. The contrast
between maximum night and day temperatures and between night and day humidity is often
great. Strong persistent winds are normal in many areas. This unfavorable climate imposes adverse
conditions on the concrete structures; such as:
 High temperature and high seasonal changes

 High humidity and high change relative humidity
 Strong dry winds
 Condensation at night
 Windborne salt-laden dust
 High solar radiation
5 GENERAL GEOLOGICAL OF THE AREA
The geology of the project area is part of the geology of Arabian Peninsula Gulf which is limited by
four tectonic features, the Red Sea and the Dead Sea rift system to the west, thrust zones from
Alpine Orogeny to the north, mobile belt of the Zagros and Oman mountains system to the east
and south east, and the wrench faults to the south.
Available geological literature indicates that the coastal region of the United Arab Emirates and the
floor of the Arabian Gulf is an area of extensive carbonates sedimentation. Near to surface.
The geology of the western region of UAE is dominated by Aeolian dune sand, Sabkha and
evaporation deposits of Holocene to Pleistocene age. The dune sand deposits typically comprise
fine grained silty calcareous sand. The degree of cementation generally increases with depth, (such
that the variably cemented sand grades to predominantly calcareous sandstone). Very silty
Gypsiferous sabkha and evaporate layers commonly occur within the Aeolian sand deposits.
Sabkha layers, where recent, tend to occur from surface of shallow depth. Surficial Sabkha deposits
are found throughout the coastal belt of the Arabian Gulf, and far inland in the western and
southern part of the United Arab Emirates. Sabkha is a local name used to describe relatively fine
grained super saline, silt and sand deposits, which are commonly saturated with brine, and salt
encrusted. Various formations are found below the Sabkha, Beach & Dune Sand deposits and
Bioclastic Limestone and Miliolite Sandstone. The sandstone layers are followed by conglomerate,
limestone, calcisiltite and siltstone.
6 FIELD WORK
Field work was carried out in accordance with BS 5930:2015 “Code of Practice for Site
Investigation” BS 1377 part 2: 1990 “Methods of tests for Soils for Civil Engineering Purposes”
ASTM D 1586 – 11 “Standard Test Method for Penetration Test and Split-Barrel Sampling
Soils”, and was carried out in 30th September to 02th October of 2021.
6.1 Boreholes
A total of two (2 Nos.) boreholes was drilled down to depth of 20.0m below the existing
ground level.
Borehole drilled Rotary Drilling Rig operated by Senior Drillers and assistants.
In soil, drilling proceeded by inserting the casing and flushing the borehole with water.
Water was used as circulation fluid to aid and improves core recovery. Table no. 2 includes the
coordinates, depths and elevations of the borehole.
Table no. 2
Below Boreholes, Coordinates, Depths and Elevations
Coordinates Date
Borehole Depth *Elevation
Easting Northing
No. (m) (m) Started Completed
E N
BH-01 20.0 775852.60 2617575.11 +1.0 30-09-21 30-09-21
BH-02 20.0 775831.23 2617588.06 +1.2 02-10-21 02-10-21
*From adjustment paved road level
6.2 Sampling of Soil and Rock
Disturbed samples of the revealed soil were taken continuously from the spoon sampler, and
kept in tight labeled polythene bags for classification and lab testing.
The details of Drilling, sampling and description of material are given on the borehole logs
sheets in Appendix B.
6.3 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)
Standard Penetration Tests were carried out in the borehole as per project specification at
interval of 1.0m interval or where applicable within the soil layers and the very weak rock
layers, in order to estimate the relative density and other soil parameters.
All SPT tests records and the N value are given at the borehole log sheets in Appendix B.
6.4 Ground Water
After completion of drilling, the borehole was kept free from any disturbance for at least 24
hours after which the ground water was measured using a dip meter.
Groundwater was not encountered in the borehole at depth of 7.5m to 10.0m below ground
level as indicated on the borehole log sheets attached in Appendix B and summarized in table
no. 3.
Table no. 3
Summary of Groundwater Depth
Borehole No. Depth (m) Depth of Groundwater, (m)
BH-01 20.0 Closed at 7.5
BH-02 20.0 Closed at 10.0
7 LABORATORY TESTING
In order to determine the physical, mechanical and chemical properties of the revealed strata
and ground water, laboratory test was carried out on selected samples according to the
following standards summarized in table no. 4.
Table no. 4
Laboratory Testing Schedule
Type of test Test Method (Standard)
Determination of Particle Sieve Distribution ASTM D 422-63-07
Determination of Water Soluble Sulphate Content of Soil BS 1377-3:2018 Cl.7.3
Determination of Water Soluble Chloride Content of Soil BS 1377-3:2018 Cl.9.2
Determination of pH Value of Soil BS 1377-3:2018 Cl.12

All lab tests results are given in Appendix C.
8 SUBSURFACE STRATA AND ANALYSIS
8.1 Ground Conditions
The ground model at the site has been developed from interpretation of the field and
laboratory test results of the two (2) boreholes at the site.
Detailed description of the subsurface conditions and results of borings are given on the
borehole log sheets attached in Appendix B.
The general soil profile is homogenous through the site and may be summarized as follows:
Table no. 5
General Soil Profile
Layer
Depth, SPT
Layer Strata Thickness
(m) ‘N’
(m)
Light brown, reddish, poorly graded SAND

1 0.0-0.3 0.3 -
with trace silt and sandstone pieces
Very dense, Light brown and light reddish

2 0.3-2.0 1.7 >50
brown, poorly graded SAND with trace silt
Very dense, light reddish, yellowish brown,

3 2.0-5.0 3.0 >50
poorly graded SAND with trace silt
Very dense, reddish brown, poorly graded

4 5.0-20.0 15.0 >50
SAND with trace silt
9 ENGINEERING CONSIDERATIONS AND RECOMMENDATION
9.1 General
 The assumed average existing ground level at 0.0m to 1.2m from adjacent paved road level.
 The assumed average paved road level is 0.0m.
 No details of structural loads were available
 Slab-on-grade is recommended to use in this site.
9.2 Foundation
9.2.1 Introduction
As per the client information, the proposed structures will be construction will consist of
service block, majlis, electric room, ground floor, first floor and roof for villa. According to the
results of the fieldwork, laboratory test and the nature of the proposed structure, shallow
foundations by means of (Isolated or Strip or Raft Foundation) can be used to support the
applied column loads as follows:
9.2.2 Shallow Foundation
Considering the encountered soil condition, and in order to minimize expected total and
differential settlements, and to achieve a homogenous and uniform surface below the footings
it is recommended to improve the soil condition at the site by the following:
- Excavate the existing ground to depth (1.0m BGL)/ (0.0m BRL)

- The excavated surface should be compacted properly using heavy roller with vibration
system.
- The excavated surface and each layer of the structural fill should be compacted to a
degree of compaction not less than 95% of the maximum dry density as obtained by
the modified proctor.
9.2.3 Recommendation
Provided that the soil condition is being improved as specified above an allowable soil bearing
capacity provided in table no. 6 is recommended in the design of the proposed structures on
the compacted granular material.
Table no. 6
Summary of Allowable Bearing Capacities
Foundation Depth BGL, Foundation Depth BRL, Allowable Bearing
Foundation Type
m m Capacity kN/m2
1.0 0.0 Isolate / Strip 200
1.0 0.0 Raft 220
*BRL: Below Road Level

Expected total settlement under the shallow foundation will be within allowed limits (less than
25.0mm for isolated and 50mm for raft).
Adequate cover of backfill shall be provided above the top of the foundation to protect the
foundation from erosion and seasonal variation.
9.2.4 Recommendation for Ground Slab
Slab -on- grade is recommended to use in this site.

Slab-on-grade foundations are a structural engineering practice whereby the concrete slab
that is to serve as the foundation for the structure is formed from a mold set into the ground.
The concrete is then placed into the mold, leaving no space between the ground and the
structure.
The structural fill under the ground slab should be compacted in layers of 25cm each. proof
rolled by heavy vibratory roller & compacted to 95% of maximum dry density as obtained by
modified proctor (ASTM D 1557).
The compaction of each layer should be verified by in-situ density test.
9.2.5 Recommended Pavement Type
The pavement design method outlined in AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures,
1993, is recommended. This method is represented in the form of procedures applicable to
the design of pavement structures, as well as the thickness of the individual structural
components. This method has the advantage of expressing the pavement in terms of
numerical value which allows an easy comparison of various structures to be made.
The method takes into consideration the relationship between traffic and traffic loading, sub
grade soil strength, climate conditions, and the properties in an abstract of defined as
structural number of “SN”. It is recommended that flexible pavement be considered for the
proposed roads and parking areas in this project
Generally, a flexible pavement cross section consists of interlocking block followed by crushed
well graded sub base, and by screened or crushed, well graded sub grade over the native soil.
Selective screening and blending could also be used to develop a higher quality base material.
It should be noted, however, that the pavement design is based on the relative quality of the
various layers, starting with the subgrade.
A higher quality base material would result in an increase in the thickness of the base material
and a reduction in the thickness of the wearing surface.
If the designer chooses to use a better quality material for the road base, he can specify the
materials satisfying one of the grading envelopes of ASTM D 1241-89 or similar grading.
The selection of the design strength value is based on the proposed method outlined in the
Asphalt Institute MS-1 “Thickness Design”. The design subgrade CBR% value is defined as the
subgrade strength value that 90% of all the test values are equal to or greater.
9.2.5.1 General Consideration for Pavement
1. The native soil in the pavement area shall be proof rolled by heavy vibratory roller &
compacted to 95% of maximum dry density as obtained by modified proctor (ASTM D
1557).
2. The subgrade layer shall be compacted to 95% of maximum dry density as obtained by
3. The sub base layer shall be compacted to 98% of maximum dry density as obtained by
4. On the top of sub base, interlocking blocks shall be provided.
5. Protection of the embankment slopes from erosion should be considered at the design
stage particularly at the high and super elevated stretches, if friable materials are used.
6. It is imperative that proper drainage ditch be provided at the cut along the alignment,
and proper surface drainage be provided at the carriageway and be considered at the
design stage.
7. For more, it is recommended to refer to "Standard Specifications for road and bridge
construction, Dec. 1997, Abu Dhabi Municipality, Road Section".
8. Further information customer can contact Basalt Laboratories for Soil Testing.
9.3 Excavations and Slopes
Excavations down to depth of about 1.0m BGL are expected across the majority of the site.
Unsupported temporary excavation walls and slopes should be carried out at gradients that
secure their stability. Temporary excavations in the Sand tend to stabilize at their angle of
repose and should have slope gradients of 2.0 horizontal to 1.0 vertical (2.0H: 1.0V).
9.4 Backfilling
9.4.1 Structural Fill / Engineering Fill
In areas where structural fill under the foundations is required (i.e. engineered fill), the
materials should be as specified below.
Liquid limit should not exceed 33% and the plasticity index shall not exceed 10%
The material passing 0.075 mm sieve shall not exceed 20%.
The organic content and Total soluble salt content not more than 2%.
Rock particles shall not exceed 75mm in size.
9.5 FOUNDATION CONCRETE
The results of the Chemical analysis for the Soil and ground water samples are presented in
Appendix (C) and may be summarized as follows:
Table No. 7
Summary of Chemical Analysis
2:1 Water/Soil Extract Ground Water
Sulphate Sulphate Chloride Sulphate Sulphate Chloride pH

Sample % Value
as SO3 as SO4 as Cl as SO3 as SO4 as Cl
Passing @25oC
2mm (mg/l) (mg/l) (%) (mg/l) (mg/l) (%)
Soil 100 100 120 0.03 - - - 8.1
Based on the soil chemical test results in table no 7. Determination test for the soils and
ground water samples, the site is categorized as presented in table no. 8 below and Shown in
Appendix D.
The recommendations of the ACI, for the protection of the structures adjacent to the soil
containing sulphate should be followed. Relevant extracts of these documents are attached in
Appendix D of this report for reference.
Table 8
Class, Cement type, Cement Content& Water Cement Ratio
Cement Free water
Min Fc' Content not /cement ratio
METHOD Class Type of Cement
Mpa less than not more
(kg/m3) than
ASTM C595 ASTM C1157
Type IP – Portland-
pozzolan cement – up to
ACI-318-08 S1 40% pozzolan permitted MS-Moderate 28 375 0.50
Sulfate
Type IS (<70)– Portland
Resistance
blast-furnace slag cement
– up to 70% slag permitted
Due to expected chlorides in the atmospheric moisture, it is advisable to use cement of type
ASTM type II or to use MSRC cement mixed with ggbs, or micro silica for all underground
elements, and to use O.P.C cement for super structure elements.
10 REPORT LIMITATIONS
The interpretation and conclusions given in this report assume that the ground conditions do
not vary beyond the range revealed by the investigation. It is possible that other conditions
may be present on, or adjacent to, the site which have not been revealed and therefore have
not been considered.
The recommendations given in the report are considered to be the most appropriate for the
loading conditions presented, or where no details were given, for assumed conditions
appropriate to the type of structure proposed, and are not intended to supplant the
engineering judgment of the foundation engineer, or to prohibit alternative interpretations of
the results.
The recommendations apply only to the proposed development and should not be used for
any other project on this site, or adjacent sites, without further reference to this company.
The opinions / interpretation identified / expresses in this report are outside the scope of this
organization’s ENAS Accreditation.
APPENDIX A
FIGURE A1 : Soil Investigation Work Permit

FIGURE A2 : Site Plan
FIGURE A3 : Site Layout and Location of Borehole
FIGURE A4 : Demarkation
Soil Investigation Work-Permission
Project Number B3N-2021-000763 Issue Date 27/Sep/2021
Permit Number B3N-2021-000763-WKST01 Municipality WRM
soil permit
Work Description
Parcel Information
Land Use: Residential Plot Number: 56
Sector: MZW11 11
Secondary Land Use: Private Residence
Plot Area(m 3600.00 Zone: Madinat Zayed
Owner's Name
Soil Test Laboratory BASALT LABORATORIES FOR SOIL TESTING
Phone 0567191070 P.O Box
1 / 2
Print Date: 03/Oct/2021 12:20:28 PM :

,
Approved electronic document issued without signature by the Municipality .
To verify the permit,please visit the municipality website mentioned below
/https://meps.dma.abudhabi.ae : +971 2 884 3143 .+971 2 898 8888 . - 50012 .
Soil Investigation Work-Permission
Project Number B3N-2021-000763 Issue Date 27/Sep/2021
Permit Number B3N-2021-000763-WKST01 Municipality WRM
Consultant Details
Creation Date SubType Consultant Name License

Number
15 Aug 2021 Designer and ZWAYA CN-1176602
Supervisor ENGINEERING ..
CONSULTANCY
L.L.C.
Task Comments:
Comments
Payment Information
Amount (AED): Receipt Number :
Paid By : BASALT LABORATORIES FOR Payment Date:

SOIL TESTING
2 / 2
Print Date: 03/Oct/2021 12:20:28 PM :

,
Approved electronic document issued without signature by the Municipality .
To verify the permit,please visit the municipality website mentioned below
/https://meps.dma.abudhabi.ae : +971 2 884 3143 .+971 2 898 8888 . - 50012 .
FIGURE A2: GENERAL SITE PLAN
PROJECT REF. NO. BL21.WR.RSI.126Rev.1

PROJECT NAME Construction of Villa
LOCATION Plot no. 56 Sector: MZW11, Zayed City, Al Dhafra Region
Heirs of Mr. Salem Mohamed Ahmed Alfalahi and Ms. Aysha
CLIENT NAME Salem Alhamli
APPENDIX A
FIGURE A3: SITE LAYOUT AND LOCATION OF BOREHOLES
Road level 0.0

APPENDIX A
FIGURE A4: DEMARKATION

APPENDIX A
APPENDIX B
 Borehole Logs
 General Subsurface Profile
 Legend of Boreholes
Form No: SW-BL-09 Revision No. : 01
Issue No: 02 Revison Date: 01 March 2019
Project Name: Construction of Villa LOG OF BORING
Owner: Heirs of Mr. Salem Mohamed Ahmed Alfalahi and Ms. Aysha Salem Alhamli Borehole No. 1
Project Location: Plot no. 56 Sector: MZW11, Zayed City, Al Dhafra Region Sheet 1 of 2
Report No. BL21.WR.RSI.126Rev.1
Borehole Depth 20.0m Date of Drill Started 30-Sep-21

Drilling Method Rotary with mud Date of Drill Completed 30-Sep-21
Ground Level +1.0m Ground Water Level N/A Drilled By: Saidan
Coordinates E. 775852.60 N. 2617575.11 Logged By: Engr. Rocelyn
Standards & Codes: 5930 - 2015 Checked By: Engr. Khaled
Samples SPT Records Core Recovery
Ground
Depth
Depth (m) S No.
Sample N1 N2 N3 N (Blows) TCR (%) SCR (%) RQD (%) UCS (Mpa)
Description Thickness (m)
Water Depth Legend
Type (m)
cm cm cm
SP-SM : (Poorly graded SAND with silt). Light brown, reddish, .....
poorly graded SAND with trace silt and sandstone pieces 0.3 x
0.5
SP-SM : (Poorly graded SAND with silt).
1.0 Very dense, Light brown and light reddish brown, x
S1 14 25 25/10.5 >50 poorly graded SAND with trace silt 1.7
1.5
2.0 2.0m
S2 15 26 24/9.5 >50 SP-SM : (Poorly graded SAND with silt).
2.5 Very dense, light reddish, yellowish brown, poorly x
graded SAND with trace silt
3.0
S3 21 36 14/4 >50
3.5
3.0
4.0 x
S4 18 32 18/8.5 >50
4.5
5.0 5.0m
S5 25/12.5 40 10/1 >50 SP-SM : (Poorly graded SAND with silt). x
5.5 Very dense, reddish brown, poorly graded SAND
with trace silt
6.0
S6 25/8.5 42 8/1 >50
6.5
x
7.0
S7 21 41 9/1 >50
7.5
5.0
8.0
S8 24 45 5/1 >50 x
8.5
9.0
S9 25/10.0 50/14.5 >50
9.5
x
10.0
SPT : Standard Penetration Test (BS 1377-9:1990 Cl.3.3 Partially Replaced, Superseded) REMARKS:
N : Number of Blows Presented to 30.0m penetration * Borehole level is related to paved road level 0.0m
S : Sample Number
TCR : Total Core Recovery
RQD : Rock Quality Designation
SCR : Solid Core Recovery
UCS : Unconfined Compressive Strength
APPENDIX B
Borehole Depth 20.0m Date of Drill Started 30-Sep-21
Drilling Method Rotary with mud Date of Drill Completed 30-Sep-21
Coordinates E. 775852.60 N. 2617575.11 Logged By: Engr. Rocelyn
Samples SPT Records Core Recovery Ground
Depth
Depth (m) S No.
Sample N1 N2 N3
N (Blows) TCR (%) SCR (%) RQD (%) UCS (Mpa)
Water Depth Legend
Type (m)
cm cm cm
S10 25/8.5 50/12.5 >50 SP-SM : (Poorly graded SAND with silt). x
with trace silt
11.0
11.5
S11 25/8.5 50/11.5 >50 x
12.0
12.5
13.0
S12 25/8.5 50/10 >50 x
13.5
14.0
14.5
x
S13 25/8.5 50/10.5 >50
15.0
10.0
15.5
x
16.0
S14 25 50/10.5 >50
16.5
17.0
x
17.5
S15 25/5 50/9.5 >50
18.0
18.5
x
19.0
S16 25/4 50/8.5 >50
19.5
x
20.0
S : Sample Number
APPENDIX B
Borehole Depth 20.0m Date of Drill Started 2-Oct-21

Drilling Method Rotary with mud Date of Drill Completed 2-Oct-21
Coordinates E. 775831.23 N. 2617588.06 Logged By: Engr.Rocelyn
Samples SPT Records Core Recovery
Ground
Depth
Depth (m) S No.
Sample N1 N2 N3 N (Blows) TCR (%) SCR (%) RQD (%) UCS (Mpa)
Water Depth Legend
Type (m)
cm cm cm
SP-SM : (Poorly graded SAND with silt). Light brown, reddish, .....
poorly graded SAND with trace silt and sandstone pieces 0.3 x
0.5
1.0 Dense, Light brown and light reddish brown,
x
poorly graded SAND with trace silt
1.5
S1 11 22 23 45
2.0 2.0m
2.5 Very dense, light reddish, yellowish brown, poorly
x
S2 20 39 11/2 >50 graded SAND with trace silt
3.0
2.5
3.5
S3 12 29 21/6 >50
4.0
x
4.5 4.5m
S4 15 30 20/4.5 >50 SP-SM : (Poorly graded SAND with silt).
with trace silt
5.5 x
S5 23 41 9/1 >50
6.0
6.5
S6 25/11.5 41 9/1 >50 x
7.0
5.5
7.5
8.0
S7 25/9.5 50 50 x
8.5
9.0
9.5
S8 25/8.5 50/12 >50 x
10.0
S : Sample Number
APPENDIX B
Borehole Depth 20.0m Date of Drill Started 2-Oct-21
Drilling Method Rotary with mud Date of Drill Completed 2-Oct-21
Coordinates E. 775831.23 N. 2617588.06 Logged By: Engr.Rocelyn
Samples SPT Records Core Recovery Ground
Depth
Depth (m) S No.
Sample N1 N2 N3
N (Blows) TCR (%) SCR (%) RQD (%) UCS (Mpa)
Water Depth Legend
Type (m)
cm cm cm
with trace silt x
11.0
S9 25/8.5 50/11.5 >50
11.5
12.0
x
12.5
S10 25/8.5 50/10.5 >50
13.0
13.5
x
14.0
S11 25/8.5 50/10 >50
14.5
15.0 x
10.0
15.5
S12 25 50/10.5 >50
16.0
x
16.5
17.0
S13 25 50/9.5 >50
17.5
x
18.0
18.5
S14 25/11.5 50/8.5 >50
19.0
x
19.5
20.0 S15 25/11 50 >50

S : Sample Number
APPENDIX B
General Subsurface Profile (A B)
A B
BH1 BH2
0.0 ..... Light brown, reddish, poorly graded SAND with trace silt and sandstone pieces ..... 0.0
x x
1.0 Very dense, Light brown and light reddish brown, poorly graded SAND with x 1.0
x
trace silt
2.0 2.0
Very dense, light reddish, yellowish brown, poorly graded SAND with trace
3.0 silt 3.0
x
x
4.0 4.0
5.0 5.0
Very dense, reddish brown, poorly graded SAND with trace silt
6.0 x 6.0
x
7.0 7.0
8.0 8.0
x
x
9.0 9.0
10.0 10.0
x
11.0 11.0
x
12.0 12.0
13.0 x 13.0
x
14.0 14.0
15.0 15.0
x
16.0 16.0
x
17.0 17.0
18.0 x 18.0
x
19.0 19.0
20.0 20.0

OWNER NAME Heirs of Mr. Salem Mohamed Ahmed Alfalahi and Ms. Aysha Salem Alhamli
General Subsurface Profile APPENDIX B

LEGEND TO BOREHOLE LOGS
SOILS ROCKS
Fill / Made Ground Limestone
Boulders and Cobbles

⁰ ₀ ⁰ ₀⁰ Conglomerate
Breccia
Gravel
..... Sandstone
Sand
Shelly Calcarenite
Silt xxxx Siltstone
Clay Mudstone
Crystalline Gypsum
Gypsum
Igneous Rock
Silty Sand
Metamorphic Rocks
SAMPLER TYPE
Name Roll or Hammer Split Spoon Bulk Sample Core Sample
Sample Disturbance Disturbed Disturbed Disturbed Undisturbed
Symbols
APPENDIX B
RELATIVE DENSITY OF GRANULAR SOILS (SAND)
(BS 5930:2015)
SPT N Value (Blows/30cm) Relative Density Angle of Internal Friction
0-4 Very Loose < 300
4 - 10 Loose 300 - 350
10 - 30 Medium dense 350 - 450
30 - 50 Dense 400 - 450
>50 Very dense >450
CONSISTENCY OF COHESIVE SOILS (CLAY)

(BS 5930:2015)
SPT N Value (Blows/30cm) Consistency Un-drained Shear Strength
(kN/m2)
<2 Very soft <20
2-4 Soft 20 - 40
4-8 Firm 40 - 75
8 - 15 Stiff 75 - 150
15 - 30 Very stiff 150 - 300
>30 Hard >300
ROCK STRENGTH CLASSIFICATION

(BS 5930:2015)
Unconfined Compressive Strength Measurement
Term for use in field or based measurement
(MPa)
0.6 - 1.0 Extremely weak
1-5 Very weak
5 - 12.5 Weak
12.5 - 25 Moderately weak
25 - 50 Medium strong
50 - 100 Strong
100 - 250 Very strong
>250 Extremely strong
RELATION of RQD and IN-SITU ROCK QUALITY

(BS 5930:2015)
RQD (%) Rock Quality
90 - 100 Excellent
75 - 90 Good
50 - 75 Fair
25 - 50 Poor
0 - 25 Very Poor
APPENDIX C
 Chemical Analysis

Particle Size Distribution of Soil
CHEMICAL TEST RESULT FOR SOIL AND GROUND WATER
Client : Heirs of Mr. Salem Mohamed Ahmed Alfalahi and Ms. Aysha Salem Alhamli
Report No. : BL21.WR.RSI.126Rev.1
Date Reported : 05 - Oct - 2021
Date Tested : 02/05 - Oct - 2021
2:1 Water/Soil Extract Ground Water
Water Soluble Sulphate

BOREHOLE SAMPLE Chloride as Sulphate as Sulphate as Chloride as pH Value @
NO. NO.
DEPTH (m)
% Passing pH of water Cl SO3 SO4 Cl 250C (0.1
as SO3 as SO4
extract at pH Unit)
2mm
0
25 C (0.1 pH
Unit) (mg/l) (mg/l) (%) (mg/l) (mg/l) (%)
2 1 1.5 100 7.7 100 120 0.03 - - - 8.1
Test Methods:
• Water Soluble Sulphate Content of Soil - BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl. 7.3 / 7.6
• Water Soluble Chloride Content of Soil - BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl. 9.2.4, 9.2.5 and 9.2.7 Volhard's method
• pH value of Soil : BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl.12
• Sulphate Content of Ground Water : BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl.7.6 / 7.3.4.4
• Chloride Content of Ground Water : BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl.9.2.7
• pH Value of Ground Water : BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl.12
Sample Preparation Method:

• Water Soluble Sulphate Content of Soil - BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl. 7.2.3
• Water Soluble Chloride Content of Soil - BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl. 9.2.3 / 9.2.7
• pH value of Soil : BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl. 12.4
• Sulphate Content of Ground Water : BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl.7.8.2
• Chloride Content of Ground Water : BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl.9.2.7
• pH Value of Ground Water : BS 1377 - 3: 2018 Cl.12.4
Form no. RP-SI-LR.01 Rev.03/15-03-2021 APPENDIX C

Date Tested : 30 Sept/ 03 - Oct - 2021
Standard Test Method
ASTM D 422-63-07
PARTICLE SIEVE DISTRIBUTION
(Withdrawn) BOREHOLE NO.1 @ 20.0 DEPTH (m)
ASTM (mm) 1 1 1 1
1.0 2.0 3.0 9.0
3/4" 19.0 100 100 100 100
3/8" 9.5 100 100 100 100
NO. 4 4.75 100 100 100 100
NO.8 2.36 100 100 99 100
NO.16 1.18 100 50 99 100
NO.30 0.600 98 46 99 99
NO.40 0.425 96 46 97 97
NO.100 0.150 45 38 27 31
NO.200 0.075 12 12 10 6
Soil Class (USCS) SP-SM SP-SM SP-SM SP-SM
Poorly graded Poorly graded Poorly graded Poorly graded
Material Description:
SAND with silt SAND with silt SAND with silt SAND with silt

BS 1377-2:1990 Cl.4.5, 5.3 and 5.4
Partially Replaced, Current, Superseded
Passing 425µm (%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Plastic Limit (%)
Plasticity Index (%)
U.S. Standard Sieve Number

200 100 40 30 16 8 4 3/8" 3/4"
100
90
80
70
60
Percent Passing
50
40
30
20
10
0
Gravel
0.075 0.150 0.425 0.600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.51 19.1
Diameter of particle
BH1 @ 1.0m BH1 @ 2.0m BH1 @ 3.0m BH1 @ 9.0m
CLAY /SILT Fine Medium Coarse Fine Coarse Cobbles Boulders

SAND Gravel
Form No. RP-SI-LR.02 Rev.02 March 11, 2020 APPENDIX C

Date Tested : 02/04 - Oct - 2021
ASTM D 422-63-07
PARTICLE SIEVE DISTRIBUTION
(Withdrawn) BOREHOLE NO.2 @ 20.0 DEPTH (m)
ASTM (mm) 2 2
2.5 6.5
3/4" 19.0 100 100
3/8" 9.5 100 100
NO. 4 4.75 100 100
NO.8 2.36 99 99
NO.16 1.18 99 96
NO.30 0.600 99 99
NO.40 0.425 97 97
NO.100 0.150 34 32
NO.200 0.075 10 7
Soil Class (USCS) SP-SM SP-SM
Poorly graded Poorly graded
Material Description:
SAND with silt SAND with silt

BS 1377-2:1990 Cl.4.5, 5.3 and 5.4
Partially Replaced, Current, Superseded
Passing 425µm (%)
Liquid Limit (%)
Plastic Limit (%)
Plasticity Index (%)
U.S. Standard Sieve Number

200 100 40 30 16 8 4 3/8" 3/4"
100
90
80
70
60
Percent Passing
50
40
30
20
10
0
Gravel
0.075 0.150 0.425 0.600 1.18 2.36 4.75 9.51 19.1
Diameter of particle
BH2 @ 2.5m BH2 @ 6.5m
CLAY /SILT Fine Medium Coarse Fine Coarse Cobbles Boulders

SAND Gravel
Form No. RP-SI-LR.02 Rev.02 March 11, 2020 APPENDIX C

APPENDIX D
 Recommendation for Concrete

ÍÌÎËÝÌËÎßÔ ÝÑÒÝÎÛÌÛ ÞË×ÔÜ×ÒÙ ÝÑÜÛ øßÝ× íïèó08÷ ßÒÜ ÝÑÓÓÛÒÌßÎÇ
ÝÑÜÛ ÝÑÓÓÛÒÌßÎÇ
º·²·¸»ò Ì¸»» ·¬»³ ¿®» ¾»§±²¼ ¬¸» ½±°» ±º ¬¸» Ý±¼» ¿²¼
¸±«´¼ ¾» ½±ª»®»¼ °»½·º·½¿´´§ ·² ¬¸» °®±¶»½¬ °»½·º·½¿¬·±²ò
ìòîòï ‰ Ì¸» ´·½»²»¼ ¼»·¹² °®±º»·±²¿´ ¸¿´´ ¿·¹²
Ý±²½®»¬» ·²¹®»¼·»²¬ ¿²¼ °®±°±®¬·±² ¿®» ¬± ¾» »´»½¬»¼ ¬±
»¨°±«®» ½´¿» ¾¿»¼ ±² ¬¸» »ª»®·¬§ ±º ¬¸» ¿²¬·½·ó
³»»¬ ¬¸» ³·²·³«³ ®»¯«·®»³»²¬ ¬¿¬»¼ ·² ¬¸» Ý±¼» ¿²¼ ¬¸»
°¿¬»¼ »¨°±«®» ±º ¬®«½¬«®¿´ ½±²½®»¬» ³»³¾»® º±®
¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´ ®»¯«·®»³»²¬ ±º ½±²¬®¿½¬ ¼±½«³»²¬ò
»¿½¸ »¨°±«®» ½¿¬»¹±®§ ¿½½±®¼·²¹ ¬± Ì¿¾´» ìòîòïò
Îìòîòï ‰ Ì¸» Ý±¼» ¿¼¼®»» º±«® »¨°±«®» ½¿¬»¹±®·» ¬¸¿¬
¿ºº»½¬ ¬¸» ®»¯«·®»³»²¬ º±® ½±²½®»¬» ¬± »²«®» ¿¼»¯«¿¬»
¼«®¿¾·´·¬§æ
ÌßÞÔÛ ìòîòï ‰ ÛÈÐÑÍËÎÛ ÝßÌÛÙÑÎ×ÛÍ ßÒÜ
Û¨°±«®» Ý¿¬»¹±®§ Ú ¿°°´·» ¬± »¨¬»®·±® ½±²½®»¬» ¬¸¿¬ ·
ÝÔßÍÍÛÍ
»¨°±»¼ ¬± ³±·¬«®» ¿²¼ ½§½´» ±º º®»»¦·²¹ ¿²¼ ¬¸¿©·²¹ô
Ý¿¬»¹±®§ Í»ª»®·¬§ Ý´¿ Ý±²¼·¬·±² ©·¬¸ ±® ©·¬¸±«¬ ¼»·½·²¹ ½¸»³·½¿´ò
Ò±¬ Ý±²½®»¬» ²±¬ »¨°±»¼ ¬± º®»»¦·²¹ó
Úð Û¨°±«®» Ý¿¬»¹±®§ Í ¿°°´·» ¬± ½±²½®»¬» ·² ½±²¬¿½¬ ©·¬¸
¿°°´·½¿¾´» ¿²¼ó¬¸¿©·²¹ ½§½´»
Ý±²½®»¬» »¨°±»¼ ¬± º®»»¦·²¹ó¿²¼ó ±·´ ±® ©¿¬»® ½±²¬¿·²·²¹ ¼»´»¬»®·±« ¿³±«²¬ ±º ©¿¬»®ó
Ó±¼»®¿¬» Úï ¬¸¿©·²¹ ½§½´» ¿²¼ ±½½¿·±²¿´ ±´«¾´» «´º¿¬» ·±² ¿ ¼»º·²»¼ ·² Ì¿¾´» ìòîòïò
»¨°±«®» ¬± ³±·¬«®»
Ú
Ú®»»¦·²¹ Ý±²½®»¬» »¨°±»¼ ¬± º®»»¦·²¹ó¿²¼ó Û¨°±«®» Ý¿¬»¹±®§ Ð ¿°°´·» ¬± ½±²½®»¬» ·² ½±²¬¿½¬ ©·¬¸
¿²¼ ¬¸¿©·²¹ Í»ª»®» Úî ¬¸¿©·²¹ ½§½´» ¿²¼ ·² ½±²¬·²«±« ©¿¬»® ®»¯«·®·²¹ ´±© °»®³»¿¾·´·¬§ò
½±²¬¿½¬ ©·¬¸ ³±·¬«®»
Ý±²½®»¬» »¨°±»¼ ¬± º®»»¦·²¹ó¿²¼ó Û¨°±«®» Ý¿¬»¹±®§ Ý ¿°°´·» ¬± ®»·²º±®½»¼ ¿²¼ °®»¬®»»¼
Ê»®§ Úí ¬¸¿©·²¹ ¿²¼ ·² ½±²¬·²«±« ½±²¬¿½¬ ½±²½®»¬» »¨°±»¼ ¬± ½±²¼·¬·±² ¬¸¿¬ ®»¯«·®» ¿¼¼·¬·±²¿´
»ª»®» ©·¬¸ ³±·¬«®» ¿²¼ »¨°±»¼ ¬± ¼»·½·²¹
½¸»³·½¿´ °®±¬»½¬·±² ¿¹¿·²¬ ½±®®±·±² ±º ®»·²º±®½»³»²¬ò
É¿¬»®ó±´«¾´» Í»ª»®·¬§ ±º »¨°±«®» ©·¬¸·² »¿½¸ ½¿¬»¹±®§ · ¼»º·²»¼ ¾§
«´º¿¬» øÍÑì÷ ·² Ü·±´ª»¼ ½´¿» ©·¬¸ ·²½®»¿·²¹ ²«³»®·½¿´ ª¿´«» ®»°®»»²¬·²¹
±·´ô °»®½»²¬ ¾§ «´º¿¬» øÍÑ ì÷ ·²
³¿ö ©¿¬»®ô °°³š ·²½®»¿·²¹´§ »ª»®» »¨°±«®» ½±²¼·¬·±²ò ß ½´¿·º·½¿¬·±² ±º
Ò±¬
Íð ÍÑ ì ä ðòïð ÍÑì ä ïëð
ðŒ · ¿·¹²»¼ ©¸»² ¬¸» »¨°±«®» »ª»®·¬§ ¸¿ ²»¹´·¹·¾´»
Í ¿°°´·½¿¾´» »ºº»½¬ ±® ¼±» ²±¬ ¿°°´§ ¬± ¬¸» ¬®«½¬«®¿´ ³»³¾»®ò
Í«´º¿¬» ïëð ÍÑì äïëðð
Ó±¼»®¿¬» Íï ðòïð ÍÑì ä ðòîð Í»¿©¿¬»® Û¨°±«®» Ý¿¬»¹±®§ Ú · «¾¼·ª·¼»¼ ·²¬± º±«® »¨°±«®»
ïëðð ÍÑì
½´¿»æ Û¨°±«®» Ý´¿ Úð · ¿·¹²»¼ ¬± ½±²½®»¬» ¬¸¿¬ ©·´´
Í»ª»®» Íî ðòîð ÍÑì îòðð
ïðôððð ²±¬ ¾» »¨°±»¼ ¬± ½§½´» ±º º®»»¦·²¹ ¿²¼ ¬¸¿©·²¹ò Û¨°±«®»
Ê»®§
Íí ÍÑ ì â îòðð ÍÑì â ïðôððð Ý´¿ Úï · ¿·¹²»¼ ¬± ½±²½®»¬» »¨°±»¼ ¬± ½§½´» ±º
»ª»®»
º®»»¦·²¹ ¿²¼ ¬¸¿©·²¹ ¿²¼ ¬¸¿¬ ©·´´ ¾» ±½½¿·±²¿´´§ »¨°±»¼
Ð Ò±¬ ×² ½±²¬¿½¬ ©·¬¸ ©¿¬»® ©¸»®» ´±©
Ðð ¬± ³±·¬«®» ¾»º±®» º®»»¦·²¹ò Û¨¿³°´» ±º Ý´¿ Úï ¿®» »¨¬»®·±®
Î»¯«·®·²¹ ¿°°´·½¿¾´» °»®³»¿¾·´·¬§ · ²±¬ ®»¯«·®»¼
´±© ×² ½±²¬¿½¬ ©·¬¸ ©¿¬»® ©¸»®» ´±© ©¿´´ô ¾»¿³ô ¹·®¼»®ô ¿²¼ ´¿¾ ²±¬ ·² ¼·®»½¬ ½±²¬¿½¬ ©·¬¸
°»®³»¿¾·´·¬§ Î»¯«·®»¼ Ðï
°»®³»¿¾·´·¬§ · ®»¯«·®»¼ò ±·´ò Û¨°±«®» Ý´¿ Úî · ¿·¹²»¼ ¬± ½±²½®»¬» »¨°±»¼ ¬±
Ò±¬ Ýð Ý±²½®»¬» ¼®§ ±® °®±¬»½¬»¼ º®±³ ½§½´» ±º º®»»¦·²¹ ¿²¼ ¬¸¿©·²¹ ¬¸¿¬ · ·² ½±²¬·²«±« ½±²¬¿½¬
¿°°´·½¿¾´» ³±·¬«®»
©·¬¸ ³±·¬«®» ¾»º±®» º®»»¦·²¹ò ß² »¨¿³°´» · ¿² »¨¬»®·±®
Ý Ýï Ý±²½®»¬»
»¨°±»¼ ¬± ³±·¬«®» ¾«¬
Ý±®®±·±²
Ó±¼»®¿¬»
²±¬ ¬± »¨¬»®²¿´ ±«®½» ±º ½¸´±®·¼» ©¿¬»® ¬¿²µ ±® ª»®¬·½¿´ ³»³¾»® ·² ½±²¬¿½¬ ©·¬¸ ±·´ò
°®±¬»½¬·±²
Ý±²½®»¬» »¨°±»¼ ¬± ³±·¬«®» ¿²¼ Û¨°±«®» Ý´¿» Úï ¿²¼ Úî ¿®» ½±²¼·¬·±² ©¸»®» »¨°±«®»
±º ®»·²º±®½»ó
³»²¬
¿² »¨¬»®²¿´ ±«®½» ±º ½¸´±®·¼» º®±³ ¬± ¼»·½·²¹ ¿´¬ · ²±¬ ¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼ò Û¨°±«®» Ý´¿ Úí ·
Í»ª»®» Ýî ¼»·½·²¹ ½¸»³·½¿´ô ¿´¬ô ¾®¿½µ·¸
©¿¬»®ô »¿©¿¬»®ô ±® °®¿§ º®±³ ¬¸»» ¿·¹²»¼ ¬± ½±²½®»¬» »¨°±»¼ ¬± ½§½´» ±º º®»»¦·²¹ ¿²¼
±«®½» ¬¸¿©·²¹ô ·² ½±²¬·²«±« ½±²¬¿½¬ ©·¬¸ ³±·¬«®»ô ¿²¼ ©¸»®»
»¨°±«®» ¬± ¼»·½·²¹ ½¸»³·½¿´ · ¿²¬·½·°¿¬»¼ò Û¨¿³°´» ¿®»
¸±®·¦±²¬¿´ ³»³¾»® ·² °¿®µ·²¹ ¬®«½¬«®»ò
Û¨°±«®» Ý¿¬»¹±®§ Í · «¾¼·ª·¼»¼ ·²¬± º±«® »¨°±«®»
½´¿»æ Û¨°±«®» Ý´¿ Íð · ¿·¹²»¼ º±® ½±²¼·¬·±²
©¸»®» ¬¸» ©¿¬»®ó±´«¾´» «´º¿¬» ½±²½»²¬®¿¬·±² ·² ½±²¬¿½¬
©·¬¸ ½±²½®»¬» · ´±© ¿²¼ ·²¶«®·±« «´º¿¬» ¿¬¬¿½µ · ²±¬ ¿
½±²½»®²ò Û¨°±«®» Ý´¿» Íïô Íîô ¿²¼ Íí ¿®» ¿·¹²»¼ º±®
¬®«½¬«®¿´ ½±²½®»¬» ³»³¾»® ·² ¼·®»½¬ ½±²¬¿½¬ ©·¬¸ ±´«¾´»
«´º¿¬» ·² ±·´ ±® ©¿¬»®ò Ì¸» »ª»®·¬§ ±º »¨°±«®» ·²½®»¿»
ÍÌÎËÝÌËÎßÔ ÝÑÒÝÎÛÌÛ ÞË×ÔÜ×ÒÙ ÝÑÜÛ øßÝ× íïèó08÷ ßÒÜ ÝÑÓÓÛÒÌßÎÇ
ÝÑÜÛ ÝÑÓÓÛÒÌßÎÇ
ÌßÞÔÛ ìòíòï ‰ ÎÛÏË×ÎÛÓÛÒÌÍ ÚÑÎ ÝÑÒÝÎÛÌÛ
ÞÇ ÛÈÐÑÍËÎÛ ÝÔßÍÍ

BL21.WR - RSI.126Rev.1 - STAMP

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

BL21.WR - RSI.126Rev.1 - STAMP

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

BL21.WR - RSI.126Rev.1 - STAMP

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SITE INVESTIGATION REPORT

Telephone No. : 00971 - 02 - 8840560

Reporting Date : 6th October 2021

Date Revision Description Prepared By Checked By Approved By

Telephone No. : 00971 - 02 - 8840560

Subject : Geotechnical Investigation Report

Engr. Khaled Neem

1.1 Purpose of Study

1.2 Scope of Work

The scope of work consists of the following:

1.3 Standards and Codes of Practice

 BS 5930: 2015 - “Code of Practice for Site Investigation”

 High temperature and high seasonal changes

5 GENERAL GEOLOGICAL OF THE AREA

6.2 Sampling of Soil and Rock

6.3 Standard Penetration Test (SPT)

Determination of Water Soluble Sulphate Content of Soil BS 1377-3:2018 Cl.7.3

Determination of Water Soluble Chloride Content of Soil BS 1377-3:2018 Cl.9.2

Determination of pH Value of Soil BS 1377-3:2018 Cl.12

8.1 Ground Conditions

Light brown, reddish, poorly graded SAND

Very dense, Light brown and light reddish

Very dense, light reddish, yellowish brown,

Very dense, reddish brown, poorly graded

9.2.2 Shallow Foundation

- Excavate the existing ground to depth (1.0m BGL)/ (0.0m BRL)

1.0 0.0 Isolate / Strip 200

1.0 0.0 Raft 220

*BRL: Below Road Level

9.2.4 Recommendation for Ground Slab

Slab -on- grade is recommended to use in this site.

9.2.5 Recommended Pavement Type

9.2.5.1 General Consideration for Pavement

9.4.1 Structural Fill / Engineering Fill

Sulphate Sulphate Chloride Sulphate Sulphate Chloride pH

Soil 100 100 120 0.03 - - - 8.1

FIGURE A1 : Soil Investigation Work Permit

Project Number B3N-2021-000763 Issue Date 27/Sep/2021

Permit Number B3N-2021-000763-WKST01 Municipality WRM

Land Use: Residential Plot Number: 56

Secondary Land Use: Private Residence

Plot Area(m 3600.00 Zone: Madinat Zayed

Soil Test Laboratory BASALT LABORATORIES FOR SOIL TESTING

Phone 0567191070 P.O Box

Print Date: 03/Oct/2021 12:20:28 PM :

Project Number B3N-2021-000763 Issue Date 27/Sep/2021

Permit Number B3N-2021-000763-WKST01 Municipality WRM

Creation Date SubType Consultant Name License

Amount (AED): Receipt Number :

Paid By : BASALT LABORATORIES FOR Payment Date:

Print Date: 03/Oct/2021 12:20:28 PM :

PROJECT REF. NO. BL21.WR.RSI.126Rev.1

Road level 0.0

PROJECT REF. NO. BL21.WR.RSI.126Rev.1

PROJECT REF. NO. BL21.WR.RSI.126Rev.1

Borehole Depth 20.0m Date of Drill Started 30-Sep-21

Borehole Depth 20.0m Date of Drill Started 2-Oct-21

20.0 S15 25/11 50 >50

PROJECT REF. NO. BL21.WR.RSI.126Rev.1