Introduction To Computing (Done)
Introduction To Computing (Done)
Course Content
Strategy/ Evaluation of Learning/
Week Lesson/Topic Learning Objectives Student Output
Methodology/Activities Evaluation Tool
1-4 Computing Understanding of Discussion Differentiate between various Comprehensive understanding
basic computing Self-paced types of computing devices of the problem addressed.
concepts, including Group Sharing (e.g., desktops, laptops,
the history and tablets, and smartphones).
evolution of
computers, the role
of computers in
society, and the
different types of
computing devices.
5-9 Hardware Identify and describe Discussion Perform routine maintenance Correct and safe assembly of a
the main components Self-paced tasks such as cleaning internal computer system.
of computer Group sharing components, checking
hardware (CPU, connections, and updating
memory, storage, hardware drivers.
input/output
devices).
10-14 Processors Identify factors that Discussion Compare and contrast Conduct a performance analysis
affect CPU Self-paced different types of processors, of different CPUs, taking into
performance, Group Sharing such as single-core, multi- account factors such as clock
including clock speed, core, and hyper-threaded speed, core count, and cache
core count, and CPUs. size.
cache size.
15-18 Object-Oriented Discuss ethical Discussion Recognize and mitigate cyber Evaluate the impact and
Programming and considerations Self-paced security threats such as potential applications of new
Personal Computing related to personal Group Sharing phishing and malware. technologies in various
computing, including contexts.
intellectual property
INFORMATIC TECHNOLOGICAL COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC.
Prk. 2A Distric 1 Barangay 5(Pob.) San Francisco, Agusan del Sur
GRADING SYSTEM
Grades are determined by computing a student’s performance over the term for both lecture and laboratory. A failing
grade may be given to a student who does not meet attendance requirements.
The school adopts the following grading system with the corresponding equivalence:
The course grade is based on the percentage distribution for each periodical grade to be expressed in percentage from
rounded to the nearest unit.
INFORMATIC TECHNOLOGICAL COLLEGE OF SAN FRANCISCO INC.
Prk. 2A Distric 1 Barangay 5(Pob.) San Francisco, Agusan del Sur
For CHED and TESDA courses, which are semestral-based, the percentage distribution is as follows:
For other TESDA courses offered in modular forms, the percentage grade distribution within a block is as prescribed in the
syllabus.
In courses with a combination of lecturer and laboratory, the course grade is based on the proportion of lecture to
laboratory units. Hence, the course grade for a three (3) unit course with two (2) units of lecture and one (1) unit of
laboratory shall be of ratio of 2:1, lecture: laboratory, and rounded off to the nearest numeric grade.
PERIODICAL GRADE
Deviation from the recommended components may be decided or approved by the Dean upon the recommendation of
the Department Chairman/Program Coordinator and faculty to suit the program objectives and requirements.