Chapter 12 Geometrical Optics
Chapter 12 Geometrical Optics
PHYSICS I PH 110
CHAPTER 12
GEOMETRICAL OPTICS
Since ancient times, the nature and properties of light have been intensively investigated in an
attempt to address many of our needs for a better life on Earth. The question whether light is a
wave or a particle has a very interesting and a long history. The investigations about the nature of
light has unfolded a huge treasure of knowledge and understanding. This question has great
contributions to the development of the theory of quantum mechanics which presents an
altogether different picture of the world in which there are no particles, no positions, no
momenta in an ordinary sense. Today, scientists view the behavior of light as waves
(electromagnetic waves) in some situations and particles (photons) in other situations. In this
chapter, we briefly introduce aspects of light that are understood best when using wave models,
as applied to geometrical and physical optics.
Figure 12.1 An incident ray in medium 1 is reflected from the interface and maintains the same
speed 𝑣1 ,while the refracted ray is bent toward the normal and propagates in medium 2 with a
speed 𝑣2 < 𝑣1
In figure 12.1, the incident, reflected, and refracted rays are all in a plane perpendicular to the
boundary surface. In addition, the incident, reflected and refracted rays make angles 𝜃1 , 𝜃1 ′ , and
𝜃2 , respectively, with the normal to the boundary surface. Moreover, 𝑣1 and 𝑣2 are the speeds of
the light rays in media 1 and 2, respectively. Experiments and theory prove the following two
laws:
• The angle of incidence is equal to the angle of reflection. This is known as the law of
reflection. That is,
𝜃1 = 𝜃1 ′
• The law of refraction states that the incident ray, the refracted ray, and the normal to the
interface, all lie in the same plane.
The speed of light v in any material is less than its speed in vacuum c. It is found that the value
of v slightly depends on the wavelength λ. Also, it is convenient to define a dimensionless
quantity known as the index of refraction or refractive index n of a material as follows:
𝑐
𝑛=𝑣
As light crosses an interface between two media, its speed v and wavelength λ change, but its
frequency f remains the same. If the media 1 and 2 have indices of refraction 𝑛1 and 𝑛2 ,
respectively, then the law of refraction is given by
𝑛1 sin 𝜃1 = 𝑛2 sin 𝜃2 (Snell’s law)
This form of the law of refraction is known as Snell’s law of refraction, and we will use this form
in tackling most of our examples. To compare the refractive angle θ2 with the incident angle θ1
and the relative ratio 𝑛1 /𝑛2 for a light beam propagating from medium 1 to medium 2, we
present the following results:
• If 𝑛2 = 𝑛1 , then θ2 = θ1. In other words, the light beam will not be deflected (refracted) as it
changes media, as in figure 12.2 (a).
• If 𝑛2 > 𝑛1 , then θ2 < θ1. In other words, the light beam will refract and bend toward the
normal as in figure 12.2 (b).
Figure 12.2 Light propagating from a medium of index of refraction 𝑛1 into a medium of index
of refraction 𝑛2 . (a) When 𝑛2 = 𝑛1 , the beam does not bend. (b) When 𝑛2 > 𝑛1 , the beam bends
toward the normal. (c) When 𝑛2 < 𝑛1 , the beam bends away from the normal
Figure 12.3 When 𝑛1 > 𝑛2 , the angle of refraction θ2 will be greater than the angle of incidence
θ1. As θ1 increases, θ2 will increase until θ2 = 90◦. For θ1 > θc, all rays will be reflected without
any refraction.
To find θc, we use Snell’s law equation and then substitute θ1 = θc and θ2 = 90◦, to find that:
𝑛1 sin 𝜃𝑐 = 𝑛2 sin 90° = 𝑛2
This gives:
Figure 12.4 (a) A ray of light traveling in a curved transparent pipe by multiple total internal
reflections (b) A bundle of optical fibers (c) An illuminated fiber optic audio cable
The general expression of δ for any color turns out to be rather complicated. However, as the
angle of incidence decreases from a large value, the angle of deviation δ is found to decrease at
first and then increase. The angle of minimum deviation δm is found when the ray passes through
the prism symmetrically. This angle is related to the angle of the prism A, and its index of
refraction n by the relation:
The most charming example of color dispersion is that of a rainbow. To understand the
formation of a rainbow we consider a horizontal overhead white sunlight that is intercepted by
spherical raindrops. Figure 12.6 shows refractions and reflection in two raindrops that explain
how light rays from the Sun reach an observer’s eye. The first refraction separates the sunlight
into its color components. Each color is then reflected at the raindrop’s inner surface. Finally, a
second refraction increases the separation between colors, and these color rays finally make it to
the observer’s eye. Using Snell’s law and geometry, we find that the maximum deviation angles
of red and violet are about 42◦ and 40◦, respectively. The rainbow that you can see is a personal
one because different observers receive light from different raindrops.
Figure 12.6 A sketch of a rainbow formed by horizontal sunlight rays. Only two enlarged
raindrops are used to explain the rainbow’s formation for the case of the red and violet colors
only
Figure 12.7. A geometric sketch that is used to depict an image of an object placed in front of a
plane mirror. (a) An image formed for a point object. (b) An image formed by an extended
object, where the object is an upright arrow of height h
Figure 12.7 (b) shows how a plane mirror can form an image of an extended object O. The object
in this figure is an upright arrow of height h placed at a distance p from the mirror. The full
image can be inferred by locating the images of selected points on the object. One of the two
rays at the tip of the arrow follows a horizontal path to the mirror and reflects back on itself. The
second ray follows an oblique path and reflects according to the laws of reflection, as shown in
the figure. Using geometry, we find that the image I is upright, opposite to the object, and
located behind the mirror at a distance equal to the object’s distance in front of the mirror. In
addition, the height of the object and its image are equal. Also, the geometry of figure12.7 (b)
indicates that ℎ′⁄ℎ = 𝑖 ⁄𝑝.
The image I in both parts of figure12.7 is called a virtual image because no light rays pass
through it. In addition, the value of i is considered to be negative since the image is behind the
mirror and the value of h_ is considered to be positive since the image is upright.
We define the lateral magnification M of a horizontal overhead image as follows:
Image height ℎ′
𝑀= =
Object height ℎ
For plane mirrors, M = 1, since ℎ′ is positive and equal to h, or i is negative and has a magnitude
equal to p. The image formed by a plane mirror is upright but reversed. The reversal of right and
left is the reason why the word AMBULANCE is printed as across the front
of ambulance vehicles. People driving in front of such an ambulance can see the word
“AMBULANCE” immediately evident when looking in their rear-view mirrors and make way.
Figure 12.8 (a) Two parallel light rays will meet at a real focal point after reflecting from a
concave mirror. (b) The same rays will diverge from a convex mirror and appear to come from a
virtual focal point.
When parallel rays reach the surface of the concave mirror of figure 12.8 (a), they will reflect
and pass through a common point F. If we place a card at F, a point image would appear at F.
Therefore, this point is called the real focal point. However, in the case of the convex mirror of
figure 12.8 (b), the parallel rays reflect from the mirror and appear to diverge from a common
point F behind the mirror. If we could place a card at F, no image would appear on the card.
Therefore, this point is called the virtual focal point. The distance f from the centre of the mirror
to the focal point (real or virtual) is called the focal length of the mirror.
1 1 1
+ =
𝑝 𝑖 𝑓
Figure 12.9 (a) An enlargement of the top part of a converging lens. (b) An enlargement of the
top part of a diverging lens
1 1 1
= (𝑛 − 1) ( − )
𝑓 𝑅1 𝑅2
The above equation is called the lens-makers’ equation, because it can be used to determine R1
and R2 for the desired values of n and f.
The equation which relates the focal length f, the object’s distance from the lens p, and the
image’s distance i from the lens is identical to the mirror equation, written as:
1 1 1
+ =
𝑝 𝑖 𝑓
This is called the thin-lens equation. The sign conventions for R1 and R2 are presented in table
2. Just as with mirrors, the thin lens lateral magnification is:
ℎ′ 𝑖
𝑀= =−
ℎ 𝑝
Since light rays can travel in both directions of a lens, then each lens has two focal points F1 and
F2. Both focal points are at the same distance f (the focal length) from a thin lens. The focal
length f is the same for light rays passing through a given lens in either direction. This is
illustrated in figure 12.10 for a biconvex lens (converging lens) and a biconcave lens (diverging
lens).
Figure 12.10 Parallel rays passing through: (a) a converging lens, and (b) a diverging lens
Figure 12.11 shows ray diagrams for converging and diverging lenses.
Figure 12.11 Ray diagrams for locating the image formed by a thin lens. (a) An object in front of
a converging lens (double convex lens). When the object is outside the focal point, the image is
real, inverted, and on the back side of the lens. (b) When the object is between the focal point
and the converging lens (double convex lens), the image is virtual, upright, larger than the
object, and on the front side of the lens. (c) When an object is anywhere in front of a diverging
lens (double concave lens), the image is virtual, upright, smaller than the object, and on the front
side of the lens.
When using the lens-makers’ and thin-lens equations, it is very important to use the proper sign
conventions introduced in table 2.
Let us consider the case were two lenses of focal lengths f1 and f2 are in contact with each other.
Thus, two thin lenses in contact are equivalent to a single thin lens of focal length f given by
1 1 1
= +
𝑓 𝑓1 𝑓2