Gender and Culture
Gender and Culture
Gender and Culture
Keywords
Gender Role,
Culture,
Geert Hofstede,
Masculinity-Femininity,
Gender stereotypes,
Feminism.
JELL Classification
M14; Z10
Abstract
Culture influences thinking, language and human behaviour. The social environment, in which
individuals are born and live, shapes their attitudinal, emotional and behavioural reactions and the
perceptions about what is happening around. The same applies in the case of assigned/assumed roles in
society based on gender. Cultural dimensions that reflect differences in gender roles, but also elements
related to the ethics of sexual difference were highlighted by many researchers. The presentation of these
issues from the interdisciplinary perspective is the subject of this article. Briefly, the article refers to:
importance of communication in transmission of roles of those two sexes, cultural dimensions that reflect
role differences invarious cultures, discrimination issues and ethics of sexual difference.
31
Cross-Cultural Management Journal
Volume XVII, Issue 1 / 2015
32
Cross-Cultural Management Journal
Volume XVII, Issue 1 / 2015
culture. That leads to differences in the assumption gender roles do not automatically reflect
and assignment of gender roles. Basically, gender "inequality" or "discrimination". The latter one
discrimination reflects "any distinction, exclusion, involves the violation of human rights, and of free
restriction or preference based on gender [...] will. Cultural assumption of a gender emotional
which has as purpose or effect the restriction and role and its manifestation without the feeling of
exclusion of recognition, usage or exercise of constraint or limitation (raising children especially
human rights and fundamental freedoms or rights by mothers, for example, in some masculinity
recognized by law, in equality conditions, in the societies where fathers are more concerned with the
political, economic, social, cultural or any other procurement of necessary resources) are aspects
field of public life" (Law no. 324/2006). Role that can be placed in the category of discrimination
differences between sexes can be seen as (this social contract should not be considered a
manifestations of values and norms of a social "natural" one. Only this perspective can become
contract. In fact, researchers have revealed dangerous because it involves stability and rigidity
dimensions of cultural specificity that reflects these of gender roles, regardless of the will of the
gender differences stated by culture. For example, individual and the situation). Moreover, the same
masculinity-femininity dimension reflects the situation can be viewed differently by people of
degree of interchange ability of gender roles in different cultures. For example, some westerners
society (this dimension, linked to differences in classify as discriminatory the Oriental practices
socialization of children in relation to aggression - relating to behaviour and traditional clothing of
children learn to avoid aggression in feminine women. It often turns out that these women care
countries, while they learn how to defend about preserving their customs and traditions in a
themselves in masculine countries, is also much greater extent than we think and that they
linguistically manifested. Thus, "a society is actually require / impose themselves these
considered a masculine one if the gender emotional "restrictions" (limitations for outsiders, normality
roles differ clearly: men should be authoritarian, for insiders). It should be taken into consideration
harsh and focused on material success, while the changes that occur (technological, cultural,
women should be modest, gentle and concerned economic, demographic, political ones, etc.), with
with quality of life. A society is considered a direct influence on the content of gender roles and
feminine one if the gender emotional roles overlap: its dynamics. It should not be considered that these
both men and women must prove modesty, changes imply inadaptability because of the
gentleness and concern for quality of life" traditional roles, but also discrimination, if this
(Hofstede et al., 2012, p. 141). situation occurs on the framework of imposing
Assignment of social roles based on what is "established for centuries".
gender is a consequence of cultural-religious Obviously, we cannot deny the relationship
interpretations and historical and environmental between culture and discrimination, as we cannot
factors (Hofstede et al., 2012). diminish the importance of the phenomenon itself.
Issues of ethics of sexual difference were closely
Ethics of sexual difference related to religion and they were subject of
We ask ourselves, as a natural interrogations of philosophers from antiquity to
consequence of the above ideas, if there are cultural present. Feminism, as a doctrine that aims women's
premises of discrimination and if masculinity- empowerment, freedom from any subordination or
femininity dimension can provide guidance on this dominant masculine models, enhancement of
topic. We understand from the definition of this female identity, of her genuine core, revealed
dimension that we find larger differences between numerous problems, including inequality of power
the roles of the two sexes in countries characterized between sexes, the subordinate position of women
by masculinity, leading to the stronger perception in family and society, undervaluation of its role in
of gender discrimination in countries characterized social stratification and employment (Melchiorre et
by femininity, in which blurred differences lead to al., 2004). Turning to religion, we must recognize
a poor perception of gender inequality (this its role in emphasizing gender inequalities (for
dimension is presented as an example, particularly example, in most Christian religions divinity takes
to highlight the differences between femininity and the image of a man, women generally cannot serve
feminism; cultural premises of discrimination are as a priest; in the Christian Bible written by men,
related to the whole context reflected by socio- women use only 1.1% of the total number of words
cultural mentalities as well as economic and (http://afirmativ.com/2015/02/12/studiu-inedit-
political ideologies). It would be risky to consider cate-cuvinte-au-rostit-femeile-din-biblie-si-ce-
the values involved by this cultural dimension as importanta-au-avut/), which reflects the low
defining and determining the discrimination. The representation of women's contributions; in the
issues involved by the ethics of sexual difference same context women should obey to men and be
must be considered in a particular context. quiet in church etc.). We must also recognize the
Differences in cultural allocation / assumption of privileges met by women at certain times, but at the
33
Cross-Cultural Management Journal
Volume XVII, Issue 1 / 2015
same time we must balance the phenomena man; in this case we may talk about a "morality of
breadth. For example, the Vestals in ancient Rome justice". Women value more the protection from
were honoured and involved in affairs of state (it is pain, which rather characterizes a "moral
true that happened only after extremely tough responsibility" (Gilligan, apud Melchiore et al.,
compliance requirements, whose breach was 2004). The notice is valid for the observed cultures;
death). we cannot generalize because there are differences
Feminism, in its positive form (we must between cultures as masculinity-femininity
admit there are exaggerations, too) seeks equality dimension reveals.
and draws attention to socio-cultural perception Issues of ethics of sexual difference could
that women are wrongly included in the category of be solved by guaranteeing the identity of people in
"the Other One", "the Object" and characterized in their singularity, through legislative measures that
relation to the man, who is "the Subject," "the provide equivalent rights for both genders, based
Absolute". Although most primitive societies on respect for their differences (Irigaray, 2010).
founds duality of "the Same One" and "the Other Another aspect of the presented subject
One" (day-night, sun-moon, good-evil, yin-yang refers to the feminine approach in the context of
etc.), there is no connection regarding the origin feminist ideology. Equality does not mean
and the gender division (Melchiorre et al., 2004 assigning masculine features to woman, but
Beauvoir, 1949/2006). In fact, it should be seen as recognition of specific features, feminine ones, as
a complementarity, and this is also emphasized by attributes considered as they are, without under-
Irigaray (2010) in a deconstructivist discourse, who valuing comparisons. Feminism is not inconsistent
drew attention to the need of re-settle the culture by with femininity, but this highlights it, valorises it
closing “the Other One” to “the Other One”, and explains its profound significance, stressing the
"without ever reduce one to the other one". need of its development in a framework that does
Basically, specific characteristics should be not limit women’s freedoms and rights.
considered, such as: the ability to give birth, the
relationship with the nature, diffuse sexuality and Gender stereotypes
pacifism (Melchiorre et al., 2004). Differentiation leads also to inequality by
Studies point out that there is a provided stereotypes. In general, gender
contradiction and a violation of what is stereotypes (provided mostly by the representatives
acknowledged as common sense, in the context of of the opposite sex) devalue woman, who is
otherness, based on gender difference criterion: regarded as being inferior to man, without capacity
"woman is the Other in the core of a totality, whose to reason, as it appears in Aristotle or Jacque
two terms are needed one to the other one" Rousseau works. They associate her with passivity,
(Beauvoir, 1949/2006). Complementarity is renunciation, structural weakness / fragility or lack
mutilated by a binary logic thinking that held the of virtues, as opposed to masculine traits seen as
place of the dialectical manner. "One" (considered positive ones (apud Melchiorre et al., 2004). While
as an aiming point, a reference) is more important man says and does "meaningful" things, woman is
than "the Other". The mentality is perpetuated by "fluid, ambiguous and open" (Pârvu, 2005). Both
studies and masculine ideologies. Therefore, the religious sources and ancient philosophy, and
field of feminist studies (women's studies) has especially the mentality of the Middle Ages
developed. They aim to answer to the mechanisms (mirrored in many papers), were the basis for
of women’s minimization, perceived in the creating social representations and gender
androcentric scientific studies (Mathieu, in Bonte, stereotypes. What it’s interesting, these aspects
Izard, 2007). were even internalized by the fair sex, as Bordieu
Differences between men and women at noted: man / woman distinction is not so much a
genetic or cultural level highlight natural specific biological fact, as a social construct, women
aspects (men are competitive, assertive, daring, themselves helping unconsciously-bodily-postural
make visual and auditory associations, while to the dominance of men. Women internalized it no
women have superior emotional intelligence, more, no less than adopting even the thinking
networking capacity and abstract thinking) or categories of those who dominate them (Ghiu, in
cultural specific aspects (for women it’s more Bordieu, 2003). Basically, woman appears as a
important what they are, while for men it's more reflection of the man, being unable to decide her
important what they do) which do not justify at all own destiny (Lung, 2007). Old mentalities, we may
the value differences (Stănculescu, 2009, Hofstede say, but with reverberations in present. In order to
et al., 2012). Being physically or mentality overcome them, an "alive and detached thinking, a
different does not mean to be superior or inferior; quitting, a non-ecologic, nor a possessive one" is
that’s exactly what feminism is trying to explain. needed. (Irigaray, 2010).
We may notice a difference in the moral
development of women and men, in the sense that
values as fairness and equality matter more for
34
Cross-Cultural Management Journal
Volume XVII, Issue 1 / 2015
References
[1] Anghel, P. (2010). Diferenţe de sex, gen şi
cultură în comunicare [Culture, Gender and
Sexual Differences in Communication],
http://www.poezie.ro/index.php/essay/1396046
1/Diferen%C5%A3e_de_sex,_gen_si_cultur%C
4%83_%C3%AEn_comunicare
[2] Beauvoir, S. (2006). Al doilea sex. Bucureşti:
Editura Univers, trad. apud Simone de
Beauvoir, Le Deuxième sexe (1949)
[3] Bonte, P. & Izard, M. (Eds.) (2007). Dicţionar
de etnologie şi antropologie [Ethnology and
Anthropology Dictionary]. Iaşi: Editura Polirom
[4] Bordieu, P. (2003). Dominaţia masculină
[Masculine Domination]. Bucureşti: Editura
Meridiane
[5] Hall, E. (1984). Le langage silencieux. Paris :
Editions du Seuil
[6] Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G.J., Monkov, M.
(2012). Culturi şi organizaţii. Softul mental
[Cultures and Organizations. Mental Software].
Humanitas: Bucureşti
[7] Irigaray, L. (2010), Între Orient şi Occident
[Between East and West]. Iaşi: Editura
Institutul European
[8] Lege-Online.Ro, Legea nr. 324/2006 [Law no.
324/2006], http://www.lege-online.ro/lr-LEGE-
324%20-2006-%2873606%29-%281%29.html
35