EFB240 Assignmentcra 202

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 2

EFB240 Finance for International Business (Semester 2, 2020)

Assignment Criteria Sheet — 40%

Criteria 7 6 5 4 <4 Marks


Knowledge and Technological Skills [ KS 1.2 Apply technical and technological skills appropriate and effective for real world business purposes and contexts.]
Demonstrate Outstanding range and Significant use and Generally uses concepts and Has clearly incorporated some Lack of application of models
knowledge and depth of multiple links to synthesis of most models relevant to the topic. relevant literature and and concepts. May be few or
effective application of suggested models and suggested models and May be some problems e.g. frameworks but may lack citations no references to discipline
financial concepts and concepts. Appropriate, high concepts. Reference to limited use of most relevant at crucial points. May be some concepts and literature.
models (50%) quality discipline literature good quality discipline literature; link to theory & limitations e.g. most obvious
has been incorporated. literature. Discussion models may be implicit or concepts only incorporated,
Discussion demonstrates includes the key action unclear. Discussion and/or important omissions. May
excellent ability to see how steps & demonstrates demonstrates sound lack clear integration to
theories/models apply to very good application of understanding of application appropriate theory throughout the
practice. May be innovative relevant theories/models to practice. submission. Discussion
and insightful in seeing how to practice. demonstrates satisfactory
practice is informed by understanding of application to
theory. practice. / 20
Higher Order Thinking Skills [HO 2.2 Exercise independent judgement and initiative in adapting and applying knowledge and skills for effective planning, problem solving and decision making
in diverse contexts.]
Critical analysis of Takes account of complex Has addressed the Has addressed the main Context acknowledged but not Little or patchy relationship
topic, supported with context. Evidence of purpose of the project purpose of the project in a fully addressed – mechanical or established to context. May
theory (50%) creative and lateral thinking coherently and with some proficient way. Recognises basic level response. fail to address some key
to address the purpose of attempt to demonstrate defined context, Recommendations or design or issues Explanation may lack
the project in a imagination. Takes understanding is clearly method are satisfactory although coherence. May include
comprehensive and account of all key context better than the basic level. may not be the most appropriate. lengthy descriptions without
imaginative way. Well- factors and selects the May address some areas of There is clear evidence of a analysis of importance or
developed rationale and major issues. Rationale the project at a higher level. planned approach. Has addressed influence. Inadequate
arguments to support. clearly follows from Recommendations or design the main purpose at a satisfactory recommendations. Little or
Recommendations or analysis of context. Only or method are sound and level. May have some omissions no planning evident, will not
design or method minor issues related to should achieve the desired or errors in focus. May lack clear achieve identified objectives.
comprehensively address analysis and objectives. May contain some reasons for all recommendations
the objectives. implementation or level. problems and/or omissions in or design or methods.
Demonstrates high degree Recommendations or recommendations, (e.g. level
of knowledge of practical design or method show a of impact or scope of
aspects, shows creativity in very good understanding recommendations), though
approach of the practical aspects generally relevant and show
and provide an excellent more insight than basic level.
fit with all key objectives. / 20
Total Marks: /40

Grade Feedback
Overall your work demonstrates in an interesting or challenging way, originality based on proficiency in all the assessment task requirements. It also reflects consistent excellence in the
7 application of relevant concepts, analysis, design/methodology and incorporation of relevant literature.
Overall your work demonstrates a comprehensive awareness and understanding of the set material. It also reflects proficiency in application of relevant concepts, analysis,
6 design/methodology and relevant literature.
Overall your work demonstrates the ability to use and apply fundamental concepts and skills. It goes beyond mere replication of content knowledge. It reflects satisfactory and
5 sometimes proficient application of relevant concepts, analysis, design/methodology and relevant literature.
4 Overall your work satisfies the basic learning requirements of the assessment item. It reflects satisfactory application of concepts, analysis, design/methodology and relevant literature.
<4 Overall your work does not satisfy the basic learning requirements of this assessment task.

You might also like