FACULTY OF INFORMATION MANAGEMENT (IM)

BACHELOR OF SCIENCE IN INFORMATION SYSTEM

MANAGEMENT (IM245)

INFORMATION ANALYSIS FOR DECISION MAKING

(IMS 502)

ASSIGNMENT: OPEN DATA ANALYSIS (INDIVIDUAL)

PREPARED BY:
MUHAMMAD 2022362079 NIMBSF3A
SYAHMI BIN (202321)
KAMARUL AZMAN

PREPARED FOR:
DR. HAZILA BINTI TIMAN

SUBMISSION DATE:
25TH OF JUNE 2023
 HONESTY STATEMENT

This is to state that I have completed this assignment on my own. I have not shared (given or received)
ANY help from another person in completing this assignment. I understand that any dishonest
activity discovered by the instructor will result, in a minimum, of a zero grade for this assignment.

Name: MUHAMMAD SYAHMI BIN KAMARUL AZMAN

Date: 23RD OF JUNE 2023

Signature: syahmi
 ABSTRACT

This assignment includes a comprehensive data analysis of multiple census datasets

gathered from the trusted web platform data.gov.my. The focus of this research is on
using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to undertake rigorous
statistical analysis, including mean, frequency, and standard deviation calculations.
Furthermore, the assignment necessitates the construction of meaningful diagrams
and charts based on data analysis.

The primary goal of this research is to analyze and extract useful insights from census
data in order to acquire a better knowledge of demographic trends and patterns in the
designated areas. The study demonstrates the statistical approaches used to discover
noteworthy discoveries, identify critical variables, and create correlations between
various population indicators using SPSS. (W. P. O'Hare, 2019)

Through its findings and conclusions, this investigation adds to a better understanding
of society aspects such as population growth, distribution, and socioeconomic
determinants. Using data.gov.my as a reliable data source and SPSS as the analytical
tool, this assignment provides an instructive and extensive investigation of numerous
data-driven census datasets.

.
 ACKNOWLEDGEMENT

Dear Dr.Hazila binti Timan,

I would like to express my deepest gratitude and appreciation for your assistance and
guidance throughout the process of concluding my open data analysis individual
assignment. Your knowledge and commitment have been instrumental in shaping my
understanding of this topic.

I appreciate the opportunity to learn under your guidance, and I admire your dedication
to teaching and knowledge sharing. Your dedication to nurturing a supportive learning
environment has had a substantial impact on my academic progression.

Again, I'd like to extend my deepest gratitude for your unwavering support and
encouragement. Your assistance has been invaluable in augmenting my abilities and
broadening my horizons in the field of open data analysis. It has been a delight to
participate in your class.

With warm regards,

Muhammad Syahmi bin Kamarul Azman

 TABLE OF CONTENT

Contents Page
Introduction……….…………………………………………………………………………………………………. 1
Descriptive Analysis Findings……………………………………………….………………………………… 2 - 58
Discussion……………………………………………………………………………………………………………… 59
Conclusion……….…………………………………………………………………………………………………… 60
References……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 61
Appendices……………………………………………………………………………………………………………. 62 - 63
 INTRODUCTION
Countries around the world are beginning to recognize the significance of data
analysis in decision-making as it has become an essential method for comprehending
complex data. The Malaysian government has taken a stride forward by launching the
useful website data.gov.my. This duty primarily involves analyzing the data available
on this platform. SPSS (Statistical Package for the Social Sciences) is an easy-to-use
programme that will be utilized to make sense of the data and uncover crucial insights.
(Kelley, Karin, 2023)

SPSS, which stands for "Statistical Package for the Social Sciences," is a robust piece
of software for statistical analysis that is utilized in a variety of fields. It facilitates
researchers' ability to examine, summaries, and comprehend data. We will rely heavily
on descriptive statistics for this assignment, which are useful for summarizing data
using measures such as mean, frequency, and standard deviation. These figures
provide an overview of the data and allow us to identify patterns and trends. (William,
Kate, 2022)

Using both data.gov.my and SPSS, we can sift through the vast quantity of publicly
available data and uncover intriguing insights. With SPSS's descriptive statistics, we
will be able to summarize the data provided by the Malaysian government, identify the
most significant factors, and generate useful charts and graphs.

This assignment will analyze data from data.gov.my, a wonderful resource provided by
the Malaysian government, using SPSS. We will concentrate on summary statistics
such as mean, frequency, and standard deviation to gain a deeper understanding of
the data and extract valuable information from it.

1|Page
 DESCRIPTIVE ANALYSIS FINDINGS

KLUSTER: BANCIAN

1. Hospital beds in government and private hospital in Negeri Sembilan

Frequencies

Statistics

BILANGAN

TAHUN DAERAH KATEGORI HOSPITAL KATIL

N Valid 74 74 74 74 74

Missing 0 0 0 0 0

Frequency Table

TAHUN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 2016 15 20.3 20.3 20.3

2017 14 18.9 18.9 39.2

2018 14 18.9 18.9 58.1

2020 16 21.6 21.6 79.7

2021 15 20.3 20.3 100.0

Total 74 100.0 100.0

DAERAH

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Jelebu 5 6.8 6.8 6.8

Jempol 5 6.8 6.8 13.5

2|Page
 Kuala Pilah 5 6.8 6.8 20.3

Port Dickson 5 6.8 6.8 27.0

Rembau 2 2.7 2.7 29.7

Seremban 47 63.5 63.5 93.2

Tampin 5 6.8 6.8 100.0

Total 74 100.0 100.0

KATEGORI

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Kerajaan 32 43.2 43.2 43.2

Swasta 42 56.8 56.8 100.0

Total 74 100.0 100.0

HOSPITAL

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Chinese Maternity 2 2.7 2.7 2.7

Hospital And Medical
Centre

Columbia Asia 1 1.4 1.4 4.1

Extended Care Hospital
Seremban

Columbia Asia Hospital, 3 4.1 4.1 8.1

Seremban

Columbia Asia 2 2.7 2.7 10.8

Seremban

Hospital Bersalin 5 6.8 6.8 17.6

Sukhilmi

Hospital Jelebu 5 6.8 6.8 24.3

3|Page
Hospital Jempol 5 6.8 6.8 31.1

Hospital Port Dickson 5 6.8 6.8 37.8

Hospital Rembau 2 2.7 2.7 40.5

Hospital Tampin 5 6.8 6.8 47.3

Hospital Tuanku 5 6.8 6.8 54.1

Ampuan Najihah

Hospital Tuanku Ja'afar 5 6.8 6.8 60.8

Seremban

Klinik Pakar Wanita & 4 5.4 5.4 66.2

Rumah Bersalin Rekha

KPJ Seremban 2 2.7 2.7 68.9

Specialist Hospital Sdn
Bhd

Mawar Medical Centre 5 6.8 6.8 75.7

N.S. Chinese Maternity 1 1.4 1.4 77.0

Hospital and Medical
Centre

NCI Cancer 1 1.4 1.4 78.4

Nilai Medical Centre 4 5.4 5.4 83.8

NS Chinese Maternity 2 2.7 2.7 86.5

Hospital & Medical
Centre

SALAM Senawang 3 4.1 4.1 90.5

Speacialist Hospital

SALAM Senawang 2 2.7 2.7 93.2

Specialist

Sehat Centre 1 1.4 1.4 94.6

Seremban

Seremban Speacialist 2 2.7 2.7 97.3

Hospital

Seremban Speacialist 1 1.4 1.4 98.6

Hospital Sdn.Bhd.

4|Page
 UCSI 1 1.4 1.4 100.0

Total 74 100.0 100.0

BILANGAN KATIL

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 2 4 5.4 5.4 5.4

4 6 8.1 8.1 13.5

20 1 1.4 1.4 14.9

30 1 1.4 1.4 16.2

42 1 1.4 1.4 17.6

48 1 1.4 1.4 18.9

62 5 6.8 6.8 25.7

68 1 1.4 1.4 27.0

76 7 9.5 9.5 36.5

78 1 1.4 1.4 37.8

80 1 1.4 1.4 39.2

82 1 1.4 1.4 40.5

84 2 2.7 2.7 43.2

94 2 2.7 2.7 45.9

96 1 1.4 1.4 47.3

100 2 2.7 2.7 50.0

104 3 4.1 4.1 54.1

108 10 13.5 13.5 67.6

113 2 2.7 2.7 70.3

114 1 1.4 1.4 71.6

116 6 8.1 8.1 79.7

151 3 4.1 4.1 83.8

5|Page
 199 1 1.4 1.4 85.1

206 1 1.4 1.4 86.5

314 4 5.4 5.4 91.9

316 1 1.4 1.4 93.2

1070 2 2.7 2.7 95.9

1143 3 4.1 4.1 100.0

Total 74 100.0 100.0

Statistics

BILANGAN

TAHUN DAERAH KATEGORI HOSPITAL KATIL

N Valid 74 74 74 74 74

Missing 0 0 0 0 0

Mean 2018.45 167.58

Std. Deviation 1.881 266.740

Histogram

6|Page
 2. Transportation vehicle licenses in Sabah from 2018 – 2022

Frequencies

Statistics

KELAS BILANGAN

TAHUN NEGERI DAERAH PEJABAT LESEN LESEN

N Valid 1307 1307 1307 1307 1307 1307

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mean 2019.55 118.37

Std. Deviation 1.388 475.532

Frequency Table

TAHUN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 2018 364 27.9 27.9 27.9

2019 405 31.0 31.0 58.8

7|Page
 2020 180 13.8 13.8 72.6

2021 171 13.1 13.1 85.7

2022 187 14.3 14.3 100.0

Total 1307 100.0 100.0

NEGERI

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 1 .1 .1 .1

Sabah 1306 99.9 99.9 100.0

Total 1307 100.0 100.0

DAERAH

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Beaufort 45 3.4 3.4 3.4

Beluran 44 3.4 3.4 6.8

Keningau 56 4.3 4.3 11.1

Kinabatanga 43 3.3 3.3 14.4

n

Kota Belud 47 3.6 3.6 18.0

Kota 57 4.4 4.4 22.3

Kinabalu

Kota Marudu 43 3.3 3.3 25.6

Kuala Penyu 42 3.2 3.2 28.8

kudat 5 .4 .4 29.2

Kudat 40 3.1 3.1 32.3

kunak 6 .5 .5 32.7

Kunak 41 3.1 3.1 35.9

8|Page
lahad datu 29 2.2 2.2 38.1

Lahad Datu 29 2.2 2.2 40.3

Menumbok 43 3.3 3.3 43.6

Nabawan 41 3.1 3.1 46.7

Papar 52 4.0 4.0 50.7

Penampang 53 4.1 4.1 54.8

pitas 3 .2 .2 55.0

Pitas 35 2.7 2.7 57.7

putatan 6 .5 .5 58.1

Putatan 40 3.1 3.1 61.2

Ranau 42 3.2 3.2 64.4

Sandakan 58 4.4 4.4 68.9

Semporna 47 3.6 3.6 72.5

sipitang 5 .4 .4 72.8

Sipitang 38 2.9 2.9 75.7

Tambunan 42 3.2 3.2 79.0

Tawau 64 4.9 4.9 83.9

Telupid 44 3.4 3.4 87.2

Tenom 45 3.4 3.4 90.7

tongod 5 .4 .4 91.0

Tongod 38 2.9 2.9 94.0

Tuaran 54 4.1 4.1 98.1

W.P Labuan 25 1.9 1.9 100.0

Total 1307 100.0 100.0

9|Page
PEJABAT

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Kota 878 67.2 67.2 67.2

Kinabalu

Sandakan 200 15.3 15.3 82.5

Tawau 204 15.6 15.6 98.1

W.P Labuan 25 1.9 1.9 100.0

Total 1307 100.0 100.0

KELAS LESEN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid bar catar 1 .1 .1 .1

Bas Berhenti-henti 85 6.5 6.5 6.6

Bas Catar 64 4.9 4.9 11.5

Bas Ekspres 67 5.1 5.1 16.6

Bas Express 24 1.8 1.8 18.4

bas mini 7 .5 .5 19.0

Bas Mini 115 8.8 8.8 27.8

bas pekerja 1 .1 .1 27.9

Bas Pekerja 75 5.7 5.7 33.6

Bas Pengantara 59 4.5 4.5 38.1

bas sekolah 1 .1 .1 38.2

Bas Sekolah 103 7.9 7.9 46.1

kereta sewa 20 1.5 1.5 47.6

Kereta sewa 6 .5 .5 48.0

Kereta Sewa 103 7.9 7.9 55.9

10 | P a g e
 Kereta Sewa & Pandu 59 4.5 4.5 60.4

Lori Pembawa 'A' 53 4.1 4.1 64.5

Lori Pembawa 'C' 53 4.1 4.1 68.6

pembawa A 3 .2 .2 68.8

Pembawa A 79 6.0 6.0 74.8

pembawa C 1 .1 .1 74.9

Pembawa c 1 .1 .1 75.0

Pembawa C 80 6.1 6.1 81.1

teksi 1 .1 .1 81.2

Teksi 92 7.0 7.0 88.2

Teksi Lapangan 63 4.8 4.8 93.0

Terbang

Teksi Luar Bandar 35 2.7 2.7 95.7

Teksi Mewah 56 4.3 4.3 100.0

Total 1307 100.0 100.0

Histogram

11 | P a g e
 3. Medical personnel in government and private hospital from 2012 – 2021

Frequencies

Statistics

PERSONEL

TAHUN PERUBATAN KERAJAAN SWASTA JUMLAH

N Valid 40 40 40 40 40

Missing 0 0 0 0 0

Mean 2016.50 1122.55 1410.10

Std. Deviation 2.909 941.319 1178.950

Frequency Table

TAHUN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 2012 4 10.0 10.0 10.0

2013 4 10.0 10.0 20.0

12 | P a g e
 2014 4 10.0 10.0 30.0

2015 4 10.0 10.0 40.0

2016 4 10.0 10.0 50.0

2017 4 10.0 10.0 60.0

2018 4 10.0 10.0 70.0

2019 4 10.0 10.0 80.0

2020 4 10.0 10.0 90.0

2021 4 10.0 10.0 100.0

Total 40 100.0 100.0

PERSONEL PERUBATAN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Doktor 10 25.0 25.0 25.0

Doktor Gigi 10 25.0 25.0 50.0

Jururawat 10 25.0 25.0 75.0

Pegawai 10 25.0 25.0 100.0

Farmasi

Total 40 100.0 100.0

KERAJAAN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 95 1 2.5 2.5 2.5

151 1 2.5 2.5 5.0

205 1 2.5 2.5 7.5

211 1 2.5 2.5 10.0

225 1 2.5 2.5 12.5

13 | P a g e
228 1 2.5 2.5 15.0

235 1 2.5 2.5 17.5

241 1 2.5 2.5 20.0

242 1 2.5 2.5 22.5

244 1 2.5 2.5 25.0

306 1 2.5 2.5 27.5

310 1 2.5 2.5 30.0

331 1 2.5 2.5 32.5

334 1 2.5 2.5 35.0

341 1 2.5 2.5 37.5

348 2 5.0 5.0 42.5

380 1 2.5 2.5 45.0

443 1 2.5 2.5 47.5

463 1 2.5 2.5 50.0

818 1 2.5 2.5 52.5

1097 1 2.5 2.5 55.0

1348 1 2.5 2.5 57.5

1514 1 2.5 2.5 60.0

1532 2 5.0 5.0 65.0

1593 1 2.5 2.5 67.5

1617 1 2.5 2.5 70.0

1790 1 2.5 2.5 72.5

1934 1 2.5 2.5 75.0

1943 1 2.5 2.5 77.5

2230 1 2.5 2.5 80.0

2247 1 2.5 2.5 82.5

2286 1 2.5 2.5 85.0

14 | P a g e
 2350 1 2.5 2.5 87.5

2640 1 2.5 2.5 90.0

2647 1 2.5 2.5 92.5

2660 1 2.5 2.5 95.0

2689 1 2.5 2.5 97.5

2754 1 2.5 2.5 100.0

Total 40 100.0 100.0

SWASTA

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 1042 1 2.5 2.5 2.5

110 1 2.5 2.5 5.0

116 1 2.5 2.5 7.5

119 2 5.0 5.0 12.5

124 1 2.5 2.5 15.0

126 1 2.5 2.5 17.5

153 1 2.5 2.5 20.0

155 1 2.5 2.5 22.5

170 1 2.5 2.5 25.0

206 1 2.5 2.5 27.5

231 1 2.5 2.5 30.0

351 1 2.5 2.5 32.5

376 1 2.5 2.5 35.0

389 1 2.5 2.5 37.5

395 1 2.5 2.5 40.0

439 1 2.5 2.5 42.5

450 1 2.5 2.5 45.0

15 | P a g e
 455 1 2.5 2.5 47.5

46 2 5.0 5.0 52.5

471 1 2.5 2.5 55.0

56 1 2.5 2.5 57.5

67 2 5.0 5.0 62.5

672 1 2.5 2.5 65.0

769 1 2.5 2.5 67.5

77 1 2.5 2.5 70.0

772 1 2.5 2.5 72.5

829 1 2.5 2.5 75.0

927 1 2.5 2.5 77.5

93 1 2.5 2.5 80.0

94 1 2.5 2.5 82.5

990 1 2.5 2.5 85.0

Tiada 6 15.0 15.0 100.0

Maklumat

Total 40 100.0 100.0

JUMLAH

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 141 1 2.5 2.5 2.5

207 1 2.5 2.5 5.0

241 1 2.5 2.5 7.5

251 1 2.5 2.5 10.0

278 1 2.5 2.5 12.5

302 1 2.5 2.5 15.0

335 2 5.0 5.0 20.0

16 | P a g e
338 1 2.5 2.5 22.5

348 1 2.5 2.5 25.0

354 1 2.5 2.5 27.5

387 1 2.5 2.5 30.0

422 1 2.5 2.5 32.5

450 1 2.5 2.5 35.0

499 1 2.5 2.5 37.5

503 1 2.5 2.5 40.0

504 1 2.5 2.5 42.5

567 1 2.5 2.5 45.0

572 1 2.5 2.5 47.5

669 1 2.5 2.5 50.0

1194 1 2.5 2.5 52.5

1486 1 2.5 2.5 55.0

1593 1 2.5 2.5 57.5

1699 1 2.5 2.5 60.0

1770 1 2.5 2.5 62.5

1909 1 2.5 2.5 65.0

1934 1 2.5 2.5 67.5

1971 1 2.5 2.5 70.0

1982 1 2.5 2.5 72.5

2245 1 2.5 2.5 75.0

2247 1 2.5 2.5 77.5

2414 1 2.5 2.5 80.0

2640 1 2.5 2.5 82.5

3058 1 2.5 2.5 85.0

3119 1 2.5 2.5 87.5

17 | P a g e
 3157 1 2.5 2.5 90.0

3361 1 2.5 2.5 92.5

3476 1 2.5 2.5 95.0

3702 1 2.5 2.5 97.5

3744 1 2.5 2.5 100.0

Total 40 100.0 100.0

Histogram

18 | P a g e
 4. Poverty and population statistics by district in Negeri Sembilan

Frequencies

Statistics

Miskin
Tahun Daerah Miskin Tegar

N Valid 77 77 73 77

Missing 0 0 4 0

Mean 2016.00 339.95890 121.84

Std. Deviation 3.183 353.62595 379.981

7

Frequency Table

Tahun

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 2011 7 9.1 9.1 9.1

2012 7 9.1 9.1 18.2

2013 7 9.1 9.1 27.3

2014 7 9.1 9.1 36.4

2015 7 9.1 9.1 45.5

2016 7 9.1 9.1 54.5

2017 7 9.1 9.1 63.6

2018 7 9.1 9.1 72.7

2019 7 9.1 9.1 81.8

2020 7 9.1 9.1 90.9

2021 7 9.1 9.1 100.0

Total 77 100.0 100.0

19 | P a g e
Daerah

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Jelebu 11 14.3 14.3 14.3

Jempol 11 14.3 14.3 28.6

Kuala Pilah 11 14.3 14.3 42.9

Port Dickson 11 14.3 14.3 57.1

Rembau 11 14.3 14.3 71.4

Seremban 11 14.3 14.3 85.7

Tampin 11 14.3 14.3 100.0

Total 77 100.0 100.0

Miskin

Percen Valid Cumulative

Frequency t Percent Percent

Valid 34.000 1 1.3 1.4 1.4

73.000 1 1.3 1.4 2.7

103.000 1 1.3 1.4 4.1

107.000 1 1.3 1.4 5.5

109.000 1 1.3 1.4 6.8

111.000 1 1.3 1.4 8.2

114.000 2 2.6 2.7 11.0

115.000 1 1.3 1.4 12.3

124.000 1 1.3 1.4 13.7

125.000 1 1.3 1.4 15.1

126.000 2 2.6 2.7 17.8

135.000 1 1.3 1.4 19.2

142.000 1 1.3 1.4 20.5

20 | P a g e
144.000 1 1.3 1.4 21.9

145.000 1 1.3 1.4 23.3

154.000 1 1.3 1.4 24.7

156.000 1 1.3 1.4 26.0

160.000 1 1.3 1.4 27.4

165.000 1 1.3 1.4 28.8

169.000 2 2.6 2.7 31.5

174.000 1 1.3 1.4 32.9

177.000 1 1.3 1.4 34.2

179.000 1 1.3 1.4 35.6

180.000 1 1.3 1.4 37.0

189.000 1 1.3 1.4 38.4

190.000 1 1.3 1.4 39.7

192.000 1 1.3 1.4 41.1

195.000 1 1.3 1.4 42.5

199.000 1 1.3 1.4 43.8

201.000 1 1.3 1.4 45.2

207.000 1 1.3 1.4 46.6

212.000 1 1.3 1.4 47.9

213.000 1 1.3 1.4 49.3

214.000 1 1.3 1.4 50.7

217.000 1 1.3 1.4 52.1

218.000 1 1.3 1.4 53.4

222.000 1 1.3 1.4 54.8

223.000 1 1.3 1.4 56.2

227.000 1 1.3 1.4 57.5

237.000 1 1.3 1.4 58.9

21 | P a g e
241.000 1 1.3 1.4 60.3

243.000 1 1.3 1.4 61.6

245.000 1 1.3 1.4 63.0

256.000 1 1.3 1.4 64.4

260.000 1 1.3 1.4 65.8

275.000 1 1.3 1.4 67.1

290.000 1 1.3 1.4 68.5

297.000 1 1.3 1.4 69.9

303.000 1 1.3 1.4 71.2

329.000 2 2.6 2.7 74.0

350.000 1 1.3 1.4 75.3

371.000 1 1.3 1.4 76.7

383.000 1 1.3 1.4 78.1

403.000 1 1.3 1.4 79.5

418.000 1 1.3 1.4 80.8

470.000 1 1.3 1.4 82.2

507.000 1 1.3 1.4 83.6

519.000 1 1.3 1.4 84.9

593.000 1 1.3 1.4 86.3

673.000 1 1.3 1.4 87.7

822.000 1 1.3 1.4 89.0

838.000 1 1.3 1.4 90.4

866.000 1 1.3 1.4 91.8

920.000 1 1.3 1.4 93.2

997.000 1 1.3 1.4 94.5

1072.000 1 1.3 1.4 95.9

1107.000 1 1.3 1.4 97.3

22 | P a g e
 1117.000 1 1.3 1.4 98.6

2337.000 1 1.3 1.4 100.0

Total 73 94.8 100.0

Missing System 4 5.2

Total 77 100.0

MiskinTegar

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 0 12 15.6 15.6 15.6

1 8 10.4 10.4 26.0

2 2 2.6 2.6 28.6

3 3 3.9 3.9 32.5

4 1 1.3 1.3 33.8

5 2 2.6 2.6 36.4

8 2 2.6 2.6 39.0

9 3 3.9 3.9 42.9

10 1 1.3 1.3 44.2

12 2 2.6 2.6 46.8

13 1 1.3 1.3 48.1

18 3 3.9 3.9 51.9

21 4 5.2 5.2 57.1

22 1 1.3 1.3 58.4

23 1 1.3 1.3 59.7

25 1 1.3 1.3 61.0

31 2 2.6 2.6 63.6

32 1 1.3 1.3 64.9

35 2 2.6 2.6 67.5

23 | P a g e
37 1 1.3 1.3 68.8

44 2 2.6 2.6 71.4

48 1 1.3 1.3 72.7

50 1 1.3 1.3 74.0

55 1 1.3 1.3 75.3

58 2 2.6 2.6 77.9

59 1 1.3 1.3 79.2

60 1 1.3 1.3 80.5

62 1 1.3 1.3 81.8

71 1 1.3 1.3 83.1

103 1 1.3 1.3 84.4

151 1 1.3 1.3 85.7

170 1 1.3 1.3 87.0

204 1 1.3 1.3 88.3

242 1 1.3 1.3 89.6

291 1 1.3 1.3 90.9

361 1 1.3 1.3 92.2

581 1 1.3 1.3 93.5

605 1 1.3 1.3 94.8

626 1 1.3 1.3 96.1

719 1 1.3 1.3 97.4

1281 1 1.3 1.3 98.7

2905 1 1.3 1.3 100.0

Total 77 100.0 100.0

24 | P a g e
Histogram

25 | P a g e
 5. Number of District Police Headquarters, Police Stations, and Police Huts by
District in Negeri Sembilan

Frequencies

Statistics

IBU PEJABAT
POLIS IBU PEJABAT
KONTINJENN POLIS BALAI PONDOK
TAHUN DAERAH EGERI DAERAH POLIS POLIS

N Valid 49 49 49 49 49 49

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mean 2018.00 .14 1.10 7.16 5.06

Std. Deviation 2.021 .354 .368 3.313 2.025

Frequency Table

TAHUN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 2015 7 14.3 14.3 14.3

2016 7 14.3 14.3 28.6

2017 7 14.3 14.3 42.9

2018 7 14.3 14.3 57.1

2019 7 14.3 14.3 71.4

2020 7 14.3 14.3 85.7

2021 7 14.3 14.3 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

26 | P a g e
DAERAH

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid JELEBU 7 14.3 14.3 14.3

JEMPOL 7 14.3 14.3 28.6

KUALA PILAH 7 14.3 14.3 42.9

PORT 7 14.3 14.3 57.1

DICKSON

REMBAU 7 14.3 14.3 71.4

SEREMBAN 7 14.3 14.3 85.7

TAMPIN 7 14.3 14.3 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

IBU PEJABAT POLIS KONTINJEN NEGERI

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 0 42 85.7 85.7 85.7

1 7 14.3 14.3 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

IBU PEJABAT POLIS DAERAH

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 0 1 2.0 2.0 2.0

1 42 85.7 85.7 87.8

2 6 12.2 12.2 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

27 | P a g e
BALAI POLIS

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 4 14 28.6 28.6 28.6

6 7 14.3 14.3 42.9

7 14 28.6 28.6 71.4

8 7 14.3 14.3 85.7

9 1 2.0 2.0 87.8

15 6 12.2 12.2 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

PONDOK POLIS

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 2 7 14.3 14.3 14.3

3 1 2.0 2.0 16.3

4 20 40.8 40.8 57.1

5 1 2.0 2.0 59.2

7 14 28.6 28.6 87.8

8 6 12.2 12.2 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

28 | P a g e
Histogram

29 | P a g e
30 | P a g e
 6. Primary schools in Negeri Sembilan

Frequencies

Statistics

SEKOLAH SEKOLAH SEKOLAHJENIS SEKOLAH JENIS

SEKOLAH KEBANGSAAN KEBANGSAAN KEBANGSAAN KEBANGSAAN

TAHUN DAERAH KEBANGSAAN ASLI KHAS CINA TAMIL

N Valid 49 49 49 49 49 49 49

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mean 2018.00 28.88 .57 .14 10.06 9.14

Std. Deviation 2.021 13.703 .500 .354 9.017 7.214

Frequency Table

TAHUN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 2015 7 14.3 14.3 14.3

2016 7 14.3 14.3 28.6

2017 7 14.3 14.3 42.9

2018 7 14.3 14.3 57.1

2019 7 14.3 14.3 71.4

2020 7 14.3 14.3 85.7

2021 7 14.3 14.3 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

DAERAH

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Jelebu 7 14.3 14.3 14.3

31 | P a g e
 Jempol 7 14.3 14.3 28.6

Kuala Pilah 7 14.3 14.3 42.9

Port Dickson 7 14.3 14.3 57.1

Rembau 7 14.3 14.3 71.4

Seremban 7 14.3 14.3 85.7

Tampin 7 14.3 14.3 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

SEKOLAH KEBANGSAAN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 15 7 14.3 14.3 14.3

17 7 14.3 14.3 28.6

23 7 14.3 14.3 42.9

24 7 14.3 14.3 57.1

30 7 14.3 14.3 71.4

35 7 14.3 14.3 85.7

57 1 2.0 2.0 87.8

58 4 8.2 8.2 95.9

59 2 4.1 4.1 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

SEKOLAH KEBANGSAAN ASLI

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 0 21 42.9 42.9 42.9

1 28 57.1 57.1 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

32 | P a g e
SEKOLAH KEBANGSAAN KHAS

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 0 42 85.7 85.7 85.7

1 7 14.3 14.3 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

SEKOLAH JENIS KEBANGSAAN CINA

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 0 6 12.2 12.2 12.2

1 1 2.0 2.0 14.3

3 6 12.2 12.2 26.5

7 6 12.2 12.2 38.8

8 12 24.5 24.5 63.3

9 5 10.2 10.2 73.5

10 1 2.0 2.0 75.5

16 6 12.2 12.2 87.8

30 1 2.0 2.0 89.8

31 5 10.2 10.2 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

SEKOLAH JENIS KEBANGSAAN TAMIL

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 1 6 12.2 12.2 12.2

2 6 12.2 12.2 24.5

3 3 6.1 6.1 30.6

33 | P a g e
 4 4 8.2 8.2 38.8

7 7 14.3 14.3 53.1

8 2 4.1 4.1 57.1

9 1 2.0 2.0 59.2

11 6 12.2 12.2 71.4

16 1 2.0 2.0 73.5

17 6 12.2 12.2 85.7

19 4 8.2 8.2 93.9

20 2 4.1 4.1 98.0

31 1 2.0 2.0 100.0

Total 49 100.0 100.0

Histogram

34 | P a g e
35 | P a g e
36 | P a g e
 7. Percentage of Women as KSU, TKSU, KP, Director and General Manager of
Statutory Bodies (Badan berkanun)

Frequencies

Statistics

Peratusan
Tahun Jawatan Lelaki Perempuan Perempuan

N Valid 30 30 30 30 30

Missing 0 0 0 0 0

Mean 2019.50 46.20 9.73 12.933

Std. Deviation 1.737 52.025 10.238 9.9200

Frequency Table

Tahun

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 2017 5 16.7 16.7 16.7

2018 5 16.7 16.7 33.3

2019 5 16.7 16.7 50.0

2020 5 16.7 16.7 66.7

2021 5 16.7 16.7 83.3

2022 5 16.7 16.7 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

Jawatan

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Ketua Setiausaha 6 20.0 20.0 20.0

37 | P a g e
 Ketua Setiausaha 6 20.0 20.0 40.0
Negara

Ketua-Ketua Pengarah 6 20.0 20.0 60.0

Jabatan Persekutuan

Ketua-Ketua Pengarah, 6 20.0 20.0 80.0

Pengarah dan
Pengurus Besar Badan-
Badan Berkanun

Timbalan Ketua 6 20.0 20.0 100.0

Setiausaha

Total 30 100.0 100.0

Lelaki

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 0 4 13.3 13.3 13.3

1 5 16.7 16.7 30.0

20 2 6.7 6.7 36.7

21 1 3.3 3.3 40.0

23 2 6.7 6.7 46.7

36 2 6.7 6.7 53.3

41 1 3.3 3.3 56.7

43 1 3.3 3.3 60.0

44 2 6.7 6.7 66.7

45 1 3.3 3.3 70.0

48 1 3.3 3.3 73.3

82 1 3.3 3.3 76.7

84 1 3.3 3.3 80.0

92 1 3.3 3.3 83.3

94 1 3.3 3.3 86.7

38 | P a g e
 95 1 3.3 3.3 90.0

119 1 3.3 3.3 93.3

148 1 3.3 3.3 96.7

223 1 3.3 3.3 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

Perempuan

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 0 9 30.0 30.0 30.0

3 2 6.7 6.7 36.7

4 2 6.7 6.7 43.3

6 3 10.0 10.0 53.3

12 2 6.7 6.7 60.0

14 1 3.3 3.3 63.3

15 3 10.0 10.0 73.3

16 2 6.7 6.7 80.0

17 3 10.0 10.0 90.0

19 1 3.3 3.3 93.3

35 1 3.3 3.3 96.7

40 1 3.3 3.3 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

Peratusan Perempuan

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid .0 9 30.0 30.0 30.0

9.8 1 3.3 3.3 33.3

39 | P a g e
 10.0 1 3.3 3.3 36.7

11.5 1 3.3 3.3 40.0

12.5 2 6.7 6.7 46.7

13.8 1 3.3 3.3 50.0

14.4 1 3.3 3.3 53.3

15.2 1 3.3 3.3 56.7

15.6 1 3.3 3.3 60.0

16.7 1 3.3 3.3 63.3

17.2 1 3.3 3.3 66.7

19.1 1 3.3 3.3 70.0

20.0 1 3.3 3.3 73.3

22.2 1 3.3 3.3 76.7

23.1 2 6.7 6.7 83.3

24.1 1 3.3 3.3 86.7

25.0 1 3.3 3.3 90.0

26.8 1 3.3 3.3 93.3

27.1 1 3.3 3.3 96.7

28.3 1 3.3 3.3 100.0

Total 30 100.0 100.0

Histogram

40 | P a g e
41 | P a g e
 8. Year 2021-2022 Total Perak State Civil Servants - Under the Perak State
Government Secretary's Office.
Frequencies

Statistics

Tahun Senarai Melayu Cina India Lainlain Lelaki Perempuan

N Valid 8 8 8 8 8 8 8 8

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mean 2021.50 3251.63 10.50 191.25 11.00 2657.38 803.88

Std. Deviation .535 1839.669 9.592 211.839 8.944 1542.592 399.141

Frequency Table

Tahun

Percen Valid Cumulative

Frequency t Percent Percent

Valid 2021 4 50.0 50.0 50.0

2022 4 50.0 50.0 100.0

Total 8 100.0 100.0

Senarai

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Badan Berkanun Negeri 2 25.0 25.0 25.0

Jabatan Negeri 2 25.0 25.0 50.0

Pejabat Daerah Dan 2 25.0 25.0 75.0

Tanah

Pihak Berkuasa 2 25.0 25.0 100.0

Tempatan

Total 8 100.0 100.0

42 | P a g e
Melayu

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 1248 1 12.5 12.5 12.5

1262 1 12.5 12.5 25.0

1685 1 12.5 12.5 37.5

2398 1 12.5 12.5 50.0

4018 1 12.5 12.5 62.5

4197 1 12.5 12.5 75.0

5591 1 12.5 12.5 87.5

5614 1 12.5 12.5 100.0

Total 8 100.0 100.0

Cina

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 1 1 12.5 12.5 12.5

3 2 25.0 25.0 37.5

4 1 12.5 12.5 50.0

11 1 12.5 12.5 62.5

13 1 12.5 12.5 75.0

24 1 12.5 12.5 87.5

25 1 12.5 12.5 100.0

Total 8 100.0 100.0

43 | P a g e
India

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 36 1 12.5 12.5 12.5

49 1 12.5 12.5 25.0

91 1 12.5 12.5 37.5

96 1 12.5 12.5 50.0

97 1 12.5 12.5 62.5

100 1 12.5 12.5 75.0

490 1 12.5 12.5 87.5

571 1 12.5 12.5 100.0

Total 8 100.0 100.0

Lain lain

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 2 1 12.5 12.5 12.5

4 1 12.5 12.5 25.0

5 1 12.5 12.5 37.5

9 1 12.5 12.5 50.0

10 2 25.0 25.0 75.0

19 1 12.5 12.5 87.5

29 1 12.5 12.5 100.0

Total 8 100.0 100.0

44 | P a g e
Lelaki

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 1067 1 12.5 12.5 12.5

1121 1 12.5 12.5 25.0

1158 1 12.5 12.5 37.5

1691 1 12.5 12.5 50.0

3601 1 12.5 12.5 62.5

3635 1 12.5 12.5 75.0

4484 1 12.5 12.5 87.5

4502 1 12.5 12.5 100.0

Total 8 100.0 100.0

Perempuan

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 250 1 12.5 12.5 12.5

285 1 12.5 12.5 25.0

566 1 12.5 12.5 37.5

769 1 12.5 12.5 50.0

1043 1 12.5 12.5 62.5

1069 1 12.5 12.5 75.0

1219 1 12.5 12.5 87.5

1230 1 12.5 12.5 100.0

Total 8 100.0 100.0

45 | P a g e
Histogram

46 | P a g e
47 | P a g e
 9. Position of ISM vacancies by race Until 1 November 2021. (Note: Social Institut
Malaysia)
Frequencies

Statistics

JUMLAH

KUMPULAN MELAYU CINA LAIN LAIN JAWATAN YANG INDIA

TAHUN PERKHIDMATAN MELAYU LELAKI PEREMPUAN CINA LELAKI PEREMPUAN PEREMPUAN DIISI DI ISM INDIA LELAKI LAIN LAIN LELAKI PEREMPUAN

N Valid 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4 4

Missing 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Mean 2020.50 15.50 15.75 .00 .00 .50 34.00 .00 .25 2.00

Std. Deviation .577 12.715 2.986 .000 .000 .577 16.186 .000 .500 .816

Frequency Table

TAHUN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 2020 2 50.0 50.0 50.0

2021 2 50.0 50.0 100.0

48 | P a g e
 Total 4 100.0 100.0

KUMPULAN PERKHIDMATAN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid Pelaksana 2 50.0 50.0 50.0

Pengurusan dan 2 50.0 50.0 100.0

Profesional

Total 4 100.0 100.0

MELAYU LELAKI

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 4 1 25.0 25.0 25.0

5 1 25.0 25.0 50.0

26 1 25.0 25.0 75.0

27 1 25.0 25.0 100.0

Total 4 100.0 100.0

MELAYU PEREMPUAN

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 12 1 25.0 25.0 25.0

15 1 25.0 25.0 50.0

17 1 25.0 25.0 75.0

19 1 25.0 25.0 100.0

Total 4 100.0 100.0

49 | P a g e
JUMLAH JAWATAN YANG DIISI DI ISM

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 20 2 50.0 50.0 50.0

47 1 25.0 25.0 75.0

49 1 25.0 25.0 100.0

Total 4 100.0 100.0

LAIN LAIN LELAKI

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 0 3 75.0 75.0 75.0

1 1 25.0 25.0 100.0

Total 4 100.0 100.0

INDIA PEREMPUAN

Cumulative
Frequency Percent Valid Percent Percent

Valid 1 1 25.0 25.0 25.0

2 2 50.0 50.0 75.0

3 1 25.0 25.0 100.0

Total 4 100.0 100.0

50 | P a g e
Histogram

51 | P a g e
52 | P a g e
 10. Subethnic Indigenous Population for the year 2010.

Frequencies

Statistics

BIL
NEGERI ETNIK SUBETNIK PENDUDUK

N Valid 163 163 163 162

Missing 0 0 0 1

Mean 1099.981

Std. Deviation 4148.1478

Frequency Table

NEGERI

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 1 .6 .6 .6

JOHOR 18 11.0 11.0 11.7

53 | P a g e
 KEDAH 18 11.0 11.0 22.7

KELANTAN 18 11.0 11.0 33.7

MELAKA 18 11.0 11.0 44.8

NEGERI 18 11.0 11.0 55.8

SEMBILAN

PAHANG 18 11.0 11.0 66.9

PERAK 18 11.0 11.0 77.9

SELANGOR 18 11.0 11.0 89.0

TERENGGANU 18 11.0 11.0 100.0

Total 163 100.0 100.0

ETNIK

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 1 .6 .6 .6

SENOI 54 33.1 33.1 33.7

MELAYU 54 33.1 33.1 66.9

PROTO

NEGRITO 54 33.1 33.1 100.0

Total 163 100.0 100.0

SUBETNIK

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid 1 .6 .6 .6

Bateq 9 5.5 5.5 6.1

Che Wong 9 5.5 5.5 11.7

Jah Hut 9 5.5 5.5 17.2

Jahai 9 5.5 5.5 22.7

54 | P a g e
 Jakun 9 5.5 5.5 28.2

Kensiu 9 5.5 5.5 33.7

Kintak 9 5.5 5.5 39.3

Lanoh 9 5.5 5.5 44.8

Mah Meri 9 5.5 5.5 50.3

Mendriq 9 5.5 5.5 55.8

Orang Kanaq 9 5.5 5.5 61.3

Orang Kuala 9 5.5 5.5 66.9

Orang 9 5.5 5.5 72.4

Seletar

Semai 9 5.5 5.5 77.9

Semelai 9 5.5 5.5 83.4

Semoq Beri 9 5.5 5.5 89.0

Temiar 9 5.5 5.5 94.5

Temuan 9 5.5 5.5 100.0

Total 163 100.0 100.0

BIL PENDUDUK

Valid Cumulative
Frequency Percent Percent Percent

Valid .0 57 35.0 35.2 35.2

1.0 13 8.0 8.0 43.2

2.0 8 4.9 4.9 48.1

3.0 8 4.9 4.9 53.1

4.0 3 1.8 1.9 54.9

5.0 2 1.2 1.2 56.2

6.0 2 1.2 1.2 57.4

8.0 2 1.2 1.2 58.6

55 | P a g e
9.0 1 .6 .6 59.3

10.0 2 1.2 1.2 60.5

12.0 1 .6 .6 61.1

13.0 1 .6 .6 61.7

14.0 2 1.2 1.2 63.0

15.0 1 .6 .6 63.6

16.0 2 1.2 1.2 64.8

18.0 1 .6 .6 65.4

19.0 1 .6 .6 66.0

20.0 1 .6 .6 66.7

21.0 1 .6 .6 67.3

23.0 1 .6 .6 67.9

24.0 2 1.2 1.2 69.1

28.0 2 1.2 1.2 70.4

30.0 1 .6 .6 71.0

32.0 1 .6 .6 71.6

34.0 1 .6 .6 72.2

38.0 1 .6 .6 72.8

40.0 1 .6 .6 73.5

43.0 1 .6 .6 74.1

48.0 1 .6 .6 74.7

62.0 1 .6 .6 75.3

85.0 1 .6 .6 75.9

123.0 1 .6 .6 76.5

132.0 1 .6 .6 77.2

134.0 1 .6 .6 77.8

163.0 1 .6 .6 78.4

56 | P a g e
186.0 1 .6 .6 79.0

205.0 1 .6 .6 79.6

208.0 1 .6 .6 80.2

219.0 1 .6 .6 80.9

222.0 1 .6 .6 81.5

225.0 1 .6 .6 82.1

229.0 1 .6 .6 82.7

344.0 1 .6 .6 83.3

356.0 1 .6 .6 84.0

369.0 1 .6 .6 84.6

504.0 1 .6 .6 85.2

530.0 1 .6 .6 85.8

610.0 1 .6 .6 86.4

762.0 1 .6 .6 87.0

811.0 1 .6 .6 87.7

895.0 1 .6 .6 88.3

906.0 1 .6 .6 88.9

1427.0 1 .6 .6 89.5

1615.0 1 .6 .6 90.1

1838.0 1 .6 .6 90.7

2464.0 1 .6 .6 91.4

3454.0 1 .6 .6 92.0

3762.0 1 .6 .6 92.6

4421.0 1 .6 .6 93.2

4769.0 1 .6 .6 93.8

5220.0 1 .6 .6 94.4

5328.0 1 .6 .6 95.1

57 | P a g e
 7091.0 1 .6 .6 95.7

7884.0 1 .6 .6 96.3

11908.0 1 .6 .6 96.9

12055.0 1 .6 .6 97.5

18541.0 1 .6 .6 98.1

18876.0 1 .6 .6 98.8

27125.0 1 .6 .6 99.4

31437.0 1 .6 .6 100.0

Total 162 99.4 100.0

Missing System 1 .6

Total 163 100.0

Histogram

58 | P a g e
 DISCUSSION

Using SPSS, we analyzed data from data.gov.my, a significant Malaysian government

resource, for this assignment. We sought out insights and patterns using descriptive
statistics and visual representations.

We were able to summarize the dataset with the aid of descriptive statistics such as
mean, frequency, and standard deviation. The mean represented the average value
of our variable. We were able to comprehend the distribution and frequency of values
within our sample by analyzing frequencies. The standard deviation informed us about
the dispersion of values around the mean. (Srivastav, A. K. 2023)

Our investigation revealed crucial census data demographic indicators. SPSS assisted
us in identifying correlations and patterns by analyzing the interactions between
variables. With the assistance of SPSS graphs and charts, we enhanced our data
visualization and were better able to identify trends.

For our data analysis, the combination of data.gov.my and SPSS proved to be a
successful strategy. We were able to investigate a variety of demographic and
socioeconomic trends due to the abundance of datasets on data.gov.my. With SPSS's
user-friendly interface and extensive statistical analysis tools, we were able to perform
a comprehensive data analysis and obtain valuable insights.

Nonetheless, we must approach our findings with prudence. We drew conclusions

based on the available data and the statistical techniques we employed. When
interpreting our results, factors such as data quality, sample size, and the limitations
of the statistical methodology should be considered. (Kibuacha, Franklin, 2021)

Overall, our data analysis of census data from data.gov.my provided us with insightful
information for this assignment. Using descriptive statistics and SPSS graphs, we
identified demographic indicators, identified trends, and drew insightful conclusions.
This demographic analysis is the basis for future research and decision-making.

We can conclude that all data taken from the website are valid as it can be read and
detected by SPSS and produced a decent graph and bars. Only one (1) data missing
detected that is from Data 10 (Subethnic Indigenous Population for the year 2010).

59 | P a g e
 CONCLUSION

In a nutshell, we used the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS) to
analyses the census statistics made accessible by data.gov.my. This study provided
valuable insights into demographic indices and socioeconomic tendencies. We were
able to obtain a better understanding of the facts at hand and draw meaningful
conclusions thanks to the use of descriptive statistics and graphical representations.
This assignment emphasizes the importance of data analysis in informing decision-
making and lays the framework for future research targeted at better understanding
the characteristics of populations.

The combination of data.gov.my and SPSS proved to be a successful strategy,

allowing us to use a vast number of datasets while also taking advantage of SPSS's
broad statistical analysis capabilities. This project illustrated how data analysis may be
used to identify population characteristics and inform decision-making processes.

Despite the fact that our findings are insightful, it is critical to examine the limits and
potential biases of the data and research approaches used. When interpreting the
results, data quality, sample size, and the range of statistical techniques used must all
be taken into account.

60 | P a g e
 REFERENCES

“What Is SPSS? Definition, Features, Types, and Use Cases.” SurveySparrow, 25

Jan. 2022, surveysparrow.com/blog/what-is-spss.

“Mastering Data Analysis: Process, Types, Methods, and Techniques.”

Simplilearn.com, 26 May 2020, www.simplilearn.com/data-analysis-methods-
process-types-article.

O’Hare, William P. “The Importance of Census Accuracy: Uses of Census Data.” The
Importance of Census Accuracy: Uses of Census Data | SpringerLink, 14 Feb. 2019,
https://doi.org.

Mean vs median | differences between methods use in statistics. (n.d.)

https://www.wallstreetmojo.com/mean-vs-median/

“Sample Size and Power.” Sample Size and Power, www.iwh.on.ca/what-researchers-

mean-by/sample-size-and-power.

Kibuacha, Frankline. “How to Determine Sample Size for a Research Study - GeoPoll.”
GeoPoll, 7 Apr. 2021, www.geopoll.com/blog/sample-size-research.

61 | P a g e
 APPENDICES

Appendix A: Results shown from Kluster Bancian

Appendix B shows the sources of the data

62 | P a g e
Appendix C: Among the data that can be retrieved in this website

63 | P a g e