Hibaea
Hibaea
Hibaea
Feature
2 /18
Adhesion Process
An adhesion is a band of scar tissue that binds together anatomic surfaces which are
normally separated from each other.
Given a tissue injury, Macrophages forms the As the adhesion The existing
the healing process basis of adhesion and develops, blood adhesions develops,
takes place in a closely fiblin matrix develops, vessels increase and so the distinction
orchestrated cascade to leading to multiplying structurally organize. from the tissue
repair the damage fibroblasts and becomes unclear and
: macrophages, angiogenesis begins. forms dense bands.
fibroblasts, fibrin matrix
etc.
3 /18
Function of Anti-adhesion
When anti-adhesion Most of the cells that Mesothelial cell has A layer rich in
barrier is placed cover the wound tissue been shown to play a Mesothelial Cells
between the surface are role in anti-adhesion forms a natural anti-
wounded tissue macrophages. adhesion surface
surfaces, it acts as a Mesothelial Cells do not and prevents the
physical barrier, yet exist on the wound formation of new
preventing adhesion surface. adhesions.
formation during the
healing of the wound.
4 /18
Characteristics
Purpose of use As a deep cavity wound dressing, Primarily reducing adhesion during spinal surgery
5 /18
Characteristics of components
COOH CH2OH
O O
O O
OH
OH
OH NHAc
Other Hibarry
Cross-linked Hyaluronic acid
Appropriate anti-adhesion retention time
• Using the Cross-linked Hyaluronic acid
: Maintenance a certain period in the body.
High viscosity ·High molecular weight
• Using the high molecular weight and high viscosity
Flow prevention when applied & catch the target correctly
undiluted solution : Optimal role of physical barriers
7 /18
Compare with other products
Viscosity 3733cPs
2340 cPs
(63% high viscosity)
8 /18
Physical-chemical Properties Test
COA by KEMTI
10 /18
Pre-clinical Test: Efficacy Test
Distance of
1.86±0.69 1.48±0.66 0.97±0.58
adhesion form
Infiltration of
inflammatory 2.80±0.45 1.80±0.84 1.80±0.45
cells
Collagen
2.60±0.55 1.80±0.45 1.60±0.89
proliferation
11 /18
The Synopsis of Clinical Study
▪ Title
A clinical study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BNCH-202 for
prevention of adhesion after spinal surgery
▪ Methods
Controlled, Multicenter, Single-blind
▪ Institutes
Yonsei University
Catholic Medical University
Gacheon Medical University
Korea University
12 /18
Certification
13 /18
Application Fields
Orthopedic surgery Spine-related surgery / Hand, foot, shoulder and trauma disease surgery
Endoscopic and open surgery of the Uterus and attached to the uterine
Obstetrics & Gynecology
disease / Cesarean/ Curettage (Incomplete missed abortion)
14 /18
Application Fields
Thesis Title Anti-adhesion barrier reduces adhesions after laparoscopic surgery for adhesiolysis
Safety * Adverse events occurred in 19 patients(8 Adept patients, 25 event; 11 LRS patients, 19 events)
This study demonstrated that use of Adept as an irrigant and postoperative instillate reduces adhesions aft
Discussion
er laparoscopic gynecologic adhesiolysis.
15 /18
Application Fields
Thesis Title Anti-adhesive effect of Anti adhesion barrier after Endoscopic sinus surgery
Patients 44 patients (experimental group, Anti adhesion barrier applied on Merocel®, n=22)
(control group, NS applied on Merocel®, n=22)
Method At the end of endoscopic sinus surgery, 6ml Anti adhesion barrier was applied on Merocel® and repeatedly
applied on the middle meatus after removal of Merocel
As a control group normal saline was allied instead of Anti adhesion barrier
Results The groups with the Anti adhesion barrier treatment showed lower adhesion formation than the
Efficacy
control
Safety The safety profile of the patients was normal at 4 weeks postoperatively
Anti adhesion barrier may be an efficacious and safe material in decreasing the incidence of adhesion after
Conclusions
sinus surgery
16 /18
Application Fields
Patients 28 male Wistar Albino rats that underwent right subtotal thyroidectomy were assigned
Group 1:Seprafilm(n=10), group 2:Interceed(n=10) and group 3:the control group(n=8)
Method After surgery, .5* .5 cm sheet of seprafilm and interceed were inserted between the trachea and the muscles
And the control group are not given any substance
After 14 days, surgical fields were evaluated for the adhesion formation.
Results Control group: all surgical fields needed to be dissected with instruments
Seprafilm group: 6 of 10 subjects had no adhesions
Efficacy 4 out of 10 needed dissection
Interceed group: 3 of 10 subjects had no adhesions.
6 out of 7 needed blunt, 1 of 7 needed sharp dissection
Safety -
Seprafilm® and Interceed® were found to be effective in preventing adhesions in re-operative thyroid surgery in
Conclusions
an animal model
17 /18
Contact
©2020 This document is confidential and property of BMI Korea All Rights Reserved.
18 /18