Unit 7 Assignment B 23 - 24 NEW - B
Unit 7 Assignment B 23 - 24 NEW - B
When submitting evidence for assessment, each learner must sign a declaration confirming that the work is
their own.
Please list the evidence submitted for each task. Indicate the page numbers where the evidence can be found or
describe the nature of the evidence (e.g. video, illustration).
Learner declaration
I certify that the work submitted for this assignment is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources used in
the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.
2 4t C
ii. y= A t +B e + + D cos(0.5 t )
t
2
ii. ∫ A t 2 +B e 4 t + Ct + D cos (0.5 t)dt
1
2
BTEC Assignment Brief v2.0
BTEC Internal Assessment January 2019
2 An object is moving with a uniform acceleration a= A m s−2, determine the
functions for:
a) Velocity v ( m s−1 ) – given v ( 0 )=B ms
−1
[Note: the work done is given by the area under the curve of force]
b) Compare the two answers
c) Using a computer spreadsheet increase the number of values used for
your numerical method
d) Analyse any effect the size of numerical step has on the result.
Comment on your results (Hint: you can use a sketch of v=C sin θ ¿ .
3
BTEC Assignment Brief v2.0
BTEC Internal Assessment January 2019
7 Newton’s laws of cooling proposes that the rate of change of temperature is
proportional to the temperature difference to the ambient (room)
temperature. And can be modelled using the equation:
dT
=−k ( T −T a )
dt
This can also be written as:
dT
=−k dt
T −T a
Where:
T =Temperature of material
T a= Ambient ( room ) temperature
k = A cooling constant
a) Integrate both sides of the equation and show that the temperature
difference is given by:
( T −T a )=C o e−kt ¿ ]
b) Calculate C o if the initial temperature is 70 ℃ and T a=C ℃ .
Each worked solution should be laid out clearly and contain brief explanations of
the stages of the calculation to indicate your understanding of how calculus can
be used to solve an engineering problem. Graphs should be well presented and
clearly labelled and comparisons between methods should be accurate and well
presented.
Criteria covered by this task:
Unit/Criteria
To achieve the criteria you must show that you are able to:
reference
Evaluate, using technically correct language and a logical structure, the correct
integral calculus and numerical integration solutions for each type of given
7/B.D2
routine and non-routine functions, including at least two set in an engineering
context.
Find accurately the integral calculus and numerical integration solutions for each
7/B.M2 type of given routine and non-routine function, and find the properties of periodic
functions.
7/B.P4 Find the indefinite integral for each type of given routine function.
Find the numerical value of the definite integral for each type of given routine
7/B.P5
function.
Find, using numerical integration and integral calculus, the area under curves for
7/B.P6
each type of given routine definitive function.
Sources of http://www.mathsisfun.com/index.htm
information
to support http://www.mathcentre.ac.uk/students/topics
you with this
Assignment
4
BTEC Assignment Brief v2.0
BTEC Internal Assessment January 2019
Table 1.
Student A B C D E f(x) g(x)
number Task 4 Task 1&5
725517 0.3 1.2 20 2 -0.1
2
6 x cos ( x )
3
e
2x
713836 3 29 11 -1.2
3.3 12 x2 e ( x ) sin((3x)
3
0.3 8 x 3 e( x ) sin(2x)
4
0.9 10 x 4 e( x ) cos(5x)
5
1.5 24 x 2 e( x ) sin(6x)
3
713978 2 24 6 -0.5
724284 1.8 2.2 25 7 -0.6
4
10 x sin (x )
5
e
7x
4.2 18 x 2 e ( x ) cos(4x)
3
1.2 33 15 -1.6
2.1 1.2 20 16 -0.1
2
21 x cos ( x )
3
e
2x
0.3 8 x 3 e( x ) sin(2x)
4
1.2 20 2 -0.1
0.6 1.4 21 3 -0.2
3
12 x sin ( x )
4
e
3x
0.9 10 x 4 e( x ) cos(5x)
5
1.6 22 4 -0.3
1.2 1.8 23 5 -0.4
3
16 x sin ( x )
4
e
5x
5
BTEC Assignment Brief v2.0
BTEC Internal Assessment January 2019
Page 1 of 12
Assessment record First submission
Pearson BTEC Level 3 Learner Registration
National Number
Programme Title Foundation/Extended
Diploma in Engineering Learner Name
2. Solving engineering
Assignment Title problems that involve Assessor Name Elena Stylianou
integration
Unit / Component Number
and Title
Unit 7: Calculus to solve engineering problems
Has an extension to the deadline been approved by the Assessor due to extenuating circumstances?
Targeted Criteria
Assessment comments
Criteria achieved
7/B.D2
7/B.M2
7/B.P4
7/B.P5
7/B.P6
General comments
Learner Declaration - I certify that the evidence submitted for Learner signature
this assignment is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources
used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of Date
malpractice.
Assessor declaration - I certify that to the best of my knowledge Assessor signature
the evidence submitted for this assignment is the learner’s own.
The learner has clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I
Date
understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.
Date of feedback to learner – this must be within a timely period of the assessment taking place
and after internal verification has taken place.
By signing the above declaration, you agree to your work and/or image (if featured in recorded and/or photographed files) to be used by
Pearson or other Pearson group companies for: (delete if not consenting to some of the following)
professional development, online support, and training of Centre Assessors
support and training for Pearson Examiners/Moderators
published resources
marketing materials
Your personal details will be kept in accordance with GDPR, if you have any concerns regarding this, please contact us via the Pearson
Contact Portal.
Resubmission authorisation by Lead Internal Verifier
All resubmissions must be authorised by the Lead Internal Verifier. Only one
resubmission is possible per assignment, providing:
● The learner has met initial deadlines set in the assignment or has met an LIV signature
agreed deadline extension.
● The tutor considers that the learner will be able to provide improved
evidence without further guidance.
● Evidence submitted for assessment has been authenticated and
accompanied by a signed and dated declaration of authenticity by the
learner.
● Resubmission evidence must be submitted within 15 working days of Date
learners receiving assessment feedback which must be within a timely
period of the assessment taking place.
Page 2 of 12
Resubmission/Retake
If a retake is required, copy, and paste the table below.
Note: a retake is for missing Pass criteria only.
Unit / Component Number Unit 7: Calculus to solve
and Title engineering problems
Learner Name 2. Solving engineering
Assignment Title problems that involve
integration
Resubmission or
Retake
Deadline Date Submitted
Targeted Criteria
Assessment comments
Criteria achieved
General comments
Learner Declaration - I certify that the evidence submitted for Learner signature
this assignment is my own. I have clearly referenced any sources
used in the work. I understand that false declaration is a form of Date
malpractice.
Assessor declaration - I certify that to the best of my knowledge Assessor signature
the evidence submitted for this assignment is the learner’s own.
The learner has clearly referenced any sources used in the work. I
Date
understand that false declaration is a form of malpractice.
Date of feedback to learner – this must be within a timely period of the assessment taking place
and after internal verification has taken place.
Page 3 of 12
Internal Verification – Assessment Decisions
Programme Title: Pearson BTEC Level 3 National Foundation/Extended Diploma in Engineering
Unit/Component Number and Title: Unit 7: Calculus to solve engineering problems
Assessor Name: Elena Stylianou Internal Verifier Name: Arsha Nishant
Assignment title: 2. Solving engineering problems that involve integration
Name of Learner Submission Type List which Assessment List the assessment and grading State why the assessment decision is
(If a larger sample is (First, Resubmission, assessment and Decision criteria where inaccurate inaccurate.
required, please add rows or Retake) grading criteria Accurate decisions have been made *If an inaccurate decision is recorded the Internal
use additional sheets) the Assessor has (Y/N) Verifier must recommend actions detailing the issues
awarded. Please to be addressed. The Assessor and the Internal Verifier
must then confirm that the action has been
state specific
undertaken before assessment decisions are issued to
criteria and not learners.
an overall grade
I confirm that the assessment decisions are accurate, there is no evidence of assessment malpractice and any action points have been addressed and completed in
respect of the whole cohort.
Internal Verifier signature Date
* Electronic signatures are acceptable on all assessment and internal verification documentation if there is an audit trail to support its authenticity. This includes a scanned signature or the
individual's centre based email address. A font style is not accepted. Please see the Centre Guide to Internal Verification for further details.