DFM Report

Picture of the part:

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP
 1.1 Project & DFM Information

Basic Part Data

Language:
EN
Preferred language to fill in the DFM Report is English. Usage of other language is applicable if upfront agreed with BSH
End Customer BSH Mould BSH Serial No 4059953
Project Name TE300 Planned Machine (T) 500
Part Name L-Housing 30 Cavities 2
Part material PA Durethan BKV30F 000000 Part CQP Clasification [ A, B, C ] B

CAD No. / Rev.-Status 60100000004224 B1-T Submission Date 27.03.2016

Part Novak Janez Novak, [email protected] , +386 (3) 8311-111

Contact (s) Tool Zorec Ivan Zorec, [email protected], +386 (3) 8322-222
Project Name3 Name, Mail, Telephone

Mould Maker Data

Customer (if not BSH) Eurel Basic Tool Dimensions (BHT) 296x346x343
Mould Maker Shanghai Weihong Injection system Cold runner system

Mould Designer John Doe, Mail, Injection Moulding Machine

5000kN
(contact1) Telephone Clamping Force [kN]

Other Name1, Mail1, Telephone1 Shot volume

with sprue [cm3] 56,5ccm
Contact (s) Name2, Mail2, Telephone2 (Foreseen value)

DFM Report Responsible John Doe, Mail, Submission Date

(Date of last revision sent to BSH)
28.04.2016
(contact2) Telephone

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 2

 1.2 Table of contents
Requested Done and Confirmed
Chapter Topic For After Supplier Datum
Quotation Tool Order Finished B OK Customer Confirmed A

1.1 Project & DFM Information   YES Novak, 2016-04-25

1. Project
1.2 Table of contents   YES Novak, 2016-04-25
2.1 Part and tool basic data   YES Novak, 2016-04-25
2. Product
2.2 Mould cavity Layout   YES Novak, 2016-04-25
Info
2.3 Gate Location and Type PROPOSAL   YES Novak, 2016-04-25
3.1 Cavity & Core main parting lines definition   YES Novak, 2016-04-25
3. Parting 3.2 Slider & Lifter core Location and parting line definition   YES Novak, 2016-04-25
Lines 3.3 Ejector pin Location Proposal   YES Novak, 2016-04-25
3.4 Venting of critical areas   YES Novak, 2016-04-25
4. Draft 4.1 Draft Analysis   YES Novak, 2016-04-25
5. Drawing
5.1 Analysis of Control Dimension, Tolerances, Surface finish,…   YES Novak, 2016-04-25
Analysis (2D)
6. Cooling 6.1 Cooling Channel Proposal & cooling of cavity inserts and critical areas  YES Zorec, 2016-04-28

For Quotation not Requested

7. Improvement
7.1 Product / Mould Improvement Proposals  YES Novak, 2016-04-25
proposals

8.1 Cavity No. typ, size and Location  YES Novak, 2016-04-25
8. Product Engrave 8.2 /  YES Novak, 2016-04-25
8.3 Adjustable model version sign typ, size and Location  YES Novak, 2016-04-25
9.1 Input data for mold flow analysis , mesh and material parameters  YES Zorec, 2016-04-28
9.2 Fill time  YES Zorec, 2016-04-28
9.3 Pressure drop Mold flow analysis  YES Zorec, 2016-04-28
9.4 Weld Lines  YES Zorec, 2016-04-28
9. Mold flow analysis 9.5 Air Traps  YES Zorec, 2016-04-28
9.6 Sink Marks  YES Zorec, 2016-04-28
9.7 Warping  YES Zorec, 2016-04-28
See
9.8 With Cooling no /
*CRITERIA
10. Remarks 10 Other remarks  no /
*CRITERIA: (Classification A,B,C - see BSH data on pg.1)
1. For A parts:  Necessary
2. For B and C parts:  If without cooling process part warps more than are allowable tolerances on drawing then COOL-analysis HAS TO BE PERFORMED

A … filled in by BSH
B … filled in by supplier

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 3

 2.1 Part and Tool basic data

Short description of Mold. Hot-runner mould

Tool can be used on 1st page planned

Confirmation: DEMAG 500t Cavity Steel 1.2343 HRC52-54
moulding machine

Type of Gate Tunnel gate Core Steel 1.2343 HRC52-54

No. of Cavity 1*1 Slider Steel 1.2343 HRC52-54
No. of Injection Points 1*1 Lifter Steel 1.2343 HRC52-54
Estimate Part Weight (g) 520g Coating of cores and cavities none
Mold Shrinkage 1.0052 Resin (Color Additiv) ABS+MB
Estimated Runner Weight (g) ---

2.2 MOULD CAVITY LAYOUT

(sketch can be used here)
On injection moulding tool concept show:
• number of cavities;
• layout of cavity inserts;
• tool orientation on the moulding machine.
Mark upper (Top) side of tool.

BSH
Decision/Comments

OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 4

 2.3 Gate location and Type Proposal

Example: Describe and show:

• sprue type;
• position of sprue-point;
• size of sprue-point;
• impact of sprue-point on part geometry (calotte, etc.);
• in case of more complex injection system, calculation of pressure-drop through
cavity and hot-runner system must be performed. (For TOOL ORDER ONLY!);
• dimension`s of cold runner system (see picture below) (For TOOL ORDER ONLY!).

BSH
Decision/Comments

OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 5

 3.1 Cavity & Core main parting lines definition

Example: Describe and show:

• main parting lines

BSH
Decision/Comments

OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 6

 3.2 Slider & Lifter cores Location and parting line definition
Example:
Describe and show:
• all slider parting lines;
• show lifters and moving directions.

Description of slider parting line

Description of 6 core lifters and moving direction

BSH
Decision/Comments
Description cavity lifter
and moving direction OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 7

 3.3 Ejector pin Location Proposal

Describe and show:

Important: If ejectors are below side cores, they must be mechanical • show position and marks of ejectors and
protected and this principle must be shown here. protection of ejectors under side cores

Examples:

The Ejector Area – Type of Ejector

The Ejector Area – Type of Ejector

BSH
Decision/Comments

OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 8

 3.4 Venting of critical areas:
(for Quotation sketch can be used here)
Show the way of venting critical areas regarding to:
Example: • part geometry;
• analysis of air traps presence;
• filling analysis.

Venting channels
Ventingchannels
channels
Venting
(blue colored)
(bluecolored)
colored)
(blue

BSH
Decision/Comments

OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 9

 4.1 Draft analysis

Show influence of drafting angles on:

• shape, surface structure and for demolding;
Example: • give potential recommendations for modification of
drafting angles on part.

Recommendation for modification of drafting angles on the part:

Analysis of drafting angles on the part:

BSH
Decision/Comments

OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 10

 5.1 Analysis of Control Dimension, Tolerances, Surface finish,…

If proposal for drawing change exist it must be clarified and confirmed here. Check 2D drawing characteristics and specially:
• control dimension analysis;
• tolerance analysis;
• how to reach the requirements?
• changeable inserts / separate inserts?!?
• surface finish analysis.

BSH
Decision/Comments

OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 11

 6.1 Cooling Channel Proposal & cooling of cavity inserts and critical areas

Show implementation of:

Examples: • cooling;
• cavity inserts (injection side & ejection side);
• critical areas (baffle plates, spiral core, etc.);
Injection side • cooling of hot-runner system;
• tool housing;
• dimension of the cooling system (e.g.
Cooling of both side-cores fi8 diameter, distance, etc. ).

Cooling of cavity insert fi8 Ejection side

Cooling of both
Cooling of insert side-sliders

Separate cooling
Cooling of central core in hot-nozzle area

Cooling
of main
cavity
insert
Cooling of central pin Injection side

BSH
Decision/Comments

OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 12

 7.1 Improvement Proposals

Describe and show proposals e.g.:

Undercut Improvement Proposal 1 • undercut Improvement Proposal;
• mould Improvement Proposal;
• cavity & Core Draft Angle Improvement Proposal;
• slider & Lifter Draft Angle Improvement Proposal.

Examples:

Problematic radius

Solution proposal

BSH
Decision/Comments

OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 13

 8 Product Engrave, Sign type size and location

Check 2D drawing demands:

Confirmation whether proposed place for signs is suitable regarding injection
moulding-tool concept. If not, here show proposal for other location. 8.1 cavity no. type, size and location
8.2 adjustable date sign type, size and location
Examples: 8.3 adjustable model version sign type, size and location

BSH
Decision/Comments

OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 14

 9 Mold flow analysis

9 Mold flow analysis:

Mold Flow Analysis Report should be a separate report,
9.1 Input data
prepared in detailed and professional manner. See points 9.1÷ 9.8 9.1.1 mesh (parameter)
9.1.2 material, process parameter (mold,
This file or files must be attached to this DFM Report. barrel, hot runner temperature, e.g.)
9.2 fill time
9.3 pressure drop
9.4 weld lines
9.5 air traps
Restriction: 9.6 sink marks
9.7 warping
9.8 cool FEM analysis
A mesh match percentage of 85% or higher is acceptable for a Dual Domain Fill+Pack analysis. A percentage of
50% or lower will cause the Fill+Pack analysis to abort. For a Dual Domain Warp analysis, the mesh match
percentage should exceed 85%.

File name Sent: Datum

DFM Report Attachment 1 DFM_MF_4059953_001. pdf 2017-04-26

DFM Report Attachment 2
DFM Report Attachment 3
DFM Report Attachment 4

BSH
Decision/Comments

OK / NOK
Name,
dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 15

 10 OTHER REMARKS B

Fill in other remarks or proposals that are important for achieving manufacturing
process as foreseen with the requirements.

BSH
Decision/Comments

IMPORTANT NOTE: If there are no remarks to the technical requirements or other related documentation OK / NOK
submitted by BSH, it is assumed, that supplier confirms to achieve required product, tool and process Name,
specifications. dd.mm.yy

BSH HOME APPLIANCES GROUP DFM Report (Version 1.0) I Page: 16