0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views11 pages

Physics 1 Answer Key

Uploaded by

animatorkeya12
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
85 views11 pages

Physics 1 Answer Key

Uploaded by

animatorkeya12
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11

Solution

DUAL NATURE

JEE main - Physics


Set A
1.
(d) diffraction and photoelectric effect
Explanation: We know that diffraction exhibits wave nature of light and photoelectric effect exhibits quantum nature of light.
Therefore, diffraction and photoelectric effect exhibit the dual nature of light.
2. (a) 2 eV
Explanation: K.E. = hv - hv0 = 8 eV
−34 15

= 8 eV - ( 6× 10 ×1.6× 10

−19
eV)
1.6×10

= 8 eV - 6 eV = 2 eV
3.
(d) 3λ
Explanation: According to Einstein’s photoelectric equation,
eVs = −
hc

λ
hc

λ0

Hence, as per question,


eV = −
hc

λ
...(i)hc

λ0

and eV

4
=
hc



hc

λ0
...(ii)
From equations (i) and (ii), we get:
hc hc hc hc
− = −
2λ 4λ λ0 4λ0

or, hc


=
3hc

4λ0

∴ λ0 = 3λ
4.
(b) particle-like behavior of light
Explanation: The photoelectric effect shows that the most commonly observed phenomena with light can be explained by
waves. But the photoelectric effect suggested a particle nature for light. Then electrons too were found to exhibit dual natures.
5.
(b) 2.5 × 1011
hc
Explanation: E = n λ
−34 8

10-7 =
n×(6.626× 10 Js)(3× 10 m/s)

−10
5000× 10 m

n = 2.5 × 1011 photons per second


6.
(c) increase
Explanation: From Einstein’s Photoelectric equation,
hc 1 2
= mvmax + ϕ
λ 2
hc

λ
= eV0 + ϕ ... (∵ 1

2
mvmax
2
= eV0)
1
V0 ∝
λ

Thus, if the incident wavelength is decreased, then the stopping potential will increase.
7.
(b) an electron
Explanation: an electron
8.
(c) 300 nm
Explanation: According to Einstein’s photoelectric equation,
1

2
mv = hν − hν
2
max 0

1 / 11
or 1

2
2
mvmax =
hc

λ

λ0
hc

where λ is the wavelength of incident radiation and λ is threshold wavelength. 0

2
mv2 = hc ( 1 λ

1

λ0
) ...(i)
1

2
m(v2) = hc( 1

λ

λ0
1
) ...(ii)
Dividing (i) by (ii), we get
1 1 1 1


1 λ λ0 1
or
480 600
= =
4 1 1 4 1 1
− −
′ λ ′ 600
λ 0 λ

Solving for λ , we get, ′

λ = 300 nm

9.
(d) λ must be less than a particular value λ 0

Explanation: λ must be less than a particular value λ 0

10. (a) The particle could be moving in an elliptic orbit with the origin at its focus.
Explanation: The de Broglie wavelength of the particle can be varying cyclically between two values λ and λ , if the particle 1 2

is moving in an elliptical orbit with origin as its one focus.


Let v1, v2 be the speeds of a particle at A and B respectively and origin is at focus O. If λ , λ are the de Broglie wavelengths 1 2

associated with particle while moving at A and B respectively.


Then, λ = and λ =
1
h

mv1
2
mv2
h

λ1 v2

λ2
=
v1
, since λ 1 > λ2 hence v2 > v1.
From figure we note that origin O is close to B than A.

11.
(d) change in the intensity of illumination into a change in photoelectric current
Explanation: The photoelectric current is directly proportional to the intensity of illumination. Therefore, a change in the
intensity of incident radiation will change the photo current also.
12.


8
(b) √ 3

h
Explanation: de Broglie wavelength, λ = mv
, when the rms speed of a gas particle at the given temperature is given as:
mv2 =
1 3

2 2
KT
−−−

3KT
or v = √ m

−−−−−−
or mv = √3mK T
h h
∴ λ = =
mv
√3mKT
−−−−−−
λ mHe THe
Hence, λHe
H
= √
m TH
H

−−−−−−−−−−−−
(4amu)(273+127)K


8
= √ = √
(2amu)(273+27)K 3

13.
(d) Gamma rays
Explanation: As P = IA
nhv n
⇒ P = A⇒ P = hv
At t

⇒ v =
P
=
16
15000

−34
= 2.5 × 1021
h(n/t) 10 ×6× 10

As v = 2.5 × 1021 sec-1 ⇒ Radiation lies in gamma region.

2 / 11
14.
−W
(d) e

Explanation: The maximum KE of the photoelectron is given by:


1 2
( mv ) = hv − W
2 max

Now, v = c

λ
and ( 1

2
mv )
2

max
= eV

∴ eV =
hc

λ
− W or V = (
hc

e
)
1

λ

W

Since, V is represented along y-axis and ( ) along x-axis, the above equation represents a straight line.
1

Slope of straight line = hc

e
−W
Intercept of straight line = e

15.
(b) λ < λ e p

Explanation: λ e < λp

16. (a) 4.13 × 10-7 m


hc
Explanation: λmax
= 3 × 1.6 × 10
−19
J

−34 8
6.6× 10 ×3× 10
⇒ λmax =
−19
3×1.6×10

= 4.13 × 10-7 m
17.
o

(b) 4133 A
Explanation: As we know,
o
12375 12375
λ0 = = = 4125A
W0 (eV) 3

18.
(d) hc/e
Explanation: The maximum KE of the photoelectron is given by:
1 2
( mv ) = hv − W
2 max

Now, v = c

λ
and ( 1

2
mv )
2

max
= eV

∴ eV =
hc

λ
− W or V = (
hc

e
)
1

λ

W

Since, V is represented along y-axis and (1/λ ) along x-axis, the above equation represents a straight line.
Slope of straight line = hc

19.
(b) A-(iv), B-(i), C-(iii), D-(ii)
Explanation: A-(iv), B-(i), C-(iii), D-(ii)
20.
(d) Photoelectric effect
Explanation: Photoelectric effect
21. (a) developing an emf
Explanation: developing an emf
22.
(b) The stopping potential is 1.9 V
Explanation: The maximum kinetic energy is,
KEmax = − ϕ
hc

1242 eV−nm
= 280 nm
- 2.5 eV
= 4.4 eV - 2.5 eV = 1.9 eV
Stopping potential V is given by,
eV = KEmax
KEmax
V= e
1.9
= e
eV
= 1.9 V

3 / 11
23.


m

λe
(d)
p
= 2√
λp me

Explanation: Energy in joule (E) = charge × potential diff. in volt


Eelectron = qeV and Eproton = qp4V
h h
de-Broglie wavelength = λ = P
=
√2mE

λe =
h
and λ P =
h
(∵ qe = qp)
√2 m e eV √2 m P e4 V

h
−−−−−−
2mp e4V


m

λe √2me eV p

λP
=
h
=√ 2me eV
= 2√
me

√2mp e4V

24.
(d) 106 m/s
Explanation: 106 m/s
25. (a) 1 : 2
Explanation: E − W 0 =
1

2
mv
2

First case, 2W 0 − W0 =
1

2
mv
2
1
...(i)
1
Second case, 5W 0 − W0 =
2
mv
2
2
...(ii)
Therefore, from equations (i) and (ii),
2
2 W0 − W0 v v1

5 W0 − W0
=
1

2
or v2
=
1

2
v
2

26.
(b) 1.5 × 1020
Explanation: Here, P = 200W, λ = 0.6μm = 0.6 × 10 −6

Energy converted to light = 25%


hc
Energy of one photon of yellow light = λ
−34 8
(6.6× 10 )×(3× 10 )
−20
= = 33 × 10 J
−6
0.6×10

Energy radiated per second as yellow light


25
= 200 ×
100
= 50 watt
Number of photons of yellow light emitted per second = 50

−20
= 1.7 × 1020
33×10

The closest value is 1.5 × 1020


27.
(d) converts light into electricity
Explanation: A photoelectric cell or photocell is an electronic device that works on the principle of the photoelectric effect and
converts light energy into electrical energy.
28. (a) C and D only
o

Explanation: UV rays have wavelength less than 5500 A. So, irrespective of power, photoelectrons wall be emitted.
29.

(b)

Explanation:

4 / 11
30.
(c) a dust particle
Explanation: Among the given particles most difficult to experimentally verify the de-broglie relationship is for a dust
particle.
Set B
31. (a) 3E
λ
Explanation: As per question, when KE of particle E, wavelength λ and when KE becomes λ + ΔE wavelength becomes 2
h
Using, λ =
√2mKE

λ h
=
2
√2m(KE+ΔE)

−−−−−−
λ KE+ΔE
⇒ = √
λ/2 KE

KE+ΔE
⇒ 4 =
KE

⇒ 4KE - KE = ΔE
∴ ΔE = 3KE = 3E

32.
(b) Δλ = 4λ 0

Explanation:

Applying momentum conservation


m m m m
× V0 + × (0) = VA + VB
2 3 2 3
V0 VA VB
= 2
=
2
+
3
...(i)
Since, collision is elastic
VB − VA
e=1= V0

⇒ V0 = VB - VA ...(ii)
V0
On solving equations (i) and (ii): VA = 5

Now, the de-Broglie wavelength of A before collision:


h h 2h
λ0 = = ⇒ λ0 =
mA V0 m mV0
( ) V0
2

Final de-Broglie wavelength:


h h 10h
λf = = ⇒ λf =
mA V0 m V0 mV0
×
2 5

10h 2h
∴ Δλ = λf − λ0 = −
mV0 mV0

8h 2h
⇒ Δλ = ⇒ Δλ = 4 ×
mv0 mv0

∴ Δλ = 4λ0

33.

(c) √3 : 1
Explanation: λ = h

p
⇒ λ =
h
⇒ λ ∝
1

√2mK⋅E √m
−−
− −−
λα mc √3
So, λc
= √

= √
12

4
=
1

34.
o

(d) 1.7 A
Explanation: de-Broglie wavelength,
h h h
λ = = =
P mv
√2mqV

−34 o

or, λ = 6.6×10

−31 −19
= 1.7 A
√2×9.1× 10 ×1.6× 10 ×50

35.
(c) 9 × 1011

5 / 11
∘ ∘

Explanation: Given, λ = 4972 A and λ = 6216 A and I = 3.6 × 10-3 Wm-2


1 2

Intensity associated with each wavelength


= 1.8 × 10-3 Wm-2
−3

= 3.6×10

work function (ϕ) = hv


−34 8
(6.62× 10 )(3× 10 )
hc
= λ
=
λ
3

= 12.4×10

λ
ev

for different wavelengths


= 2.493 eV = 3.984 × 10-19 J
3 3
12.4×10 12.4×10
ϕ1 = =
λ1 4972

= 1.994 eV = 3.184 × 10-19 J


3 3
12.4×10 12.4×10
ϕ2 = =
λ2 6216

Work function for metallic surface (ϕ) = 2.3 eV (given) ϕ 2 < ϕ

Therefore, ϕ will not contribute in this process.


2

Now, no. of electrons per m2-s = no. of photons per m2-s


no. of electrons per m2-s =
−3
1.8×10 −4
× 10
−19
3.984×10

(∵ 1cm2 =10--4m2) = 0.45 × 1012


So, the number of photoelectrons liberated in 2 sec
= 0.45 × 1012 × 2
= 9 × 1011
36.
(c) 20 : 1
Explanation: de-Broglie wavelength, λ e =
h

√2mk

where subscript e referes to electron.


The kinetic energy of the electron,
2

Kelectron =
h

2
...(i)
2m⋅λe

Where h = Plonck's contant λ = wavelength


The photon energy E = ...(ii) photon
ch

From Eqs. (ii) nd (i), we get


Ephoton ch/λ 2
hc⋅ λ 2m 2mλc hc
= = = [λ = ]
Ke le c tron 2 2 2 h v
h /2m⋅ λ h ⋅λ

5
2m 2×5×10
= = = 20 = 20 : 1
h/λc 3
50×10

37.
(c) Graph does not change
Explanation: According to Einstein's photoelectric equation
Kmax = hν - ϕ 0

⇒ eVs = hc

λ
− ϕ0

ϕ
⇒ Vs = hc

λe

0

e
where λ = wavelength of incident light
ϕ0 = work function
Vs = stopping potential
hc
Comparing die above equation with y = mx + c, we get slope = e

Increasing the frequency of incident radiation has no effect on work function and frequency. So, the graph will not change.
38. (a) λ < λ < λ
α p e

Explanation: de-Broglie wavelength is given by


h
λ =
√2mK

Let mass of proton = mp


Mass of alpha particle - 4mp
Mass of electron = me
h h h
λe = = =
√2me Ke √2me 4K √8me K

6 / 11
h
λp =
√2 m p K

h h h
λα = = =
√2mα Kα √2×2mp ×2K √8mp K

It is clear λ > λ p e

As me << mp.
∴ λe >λ p

∴ Correct order will be λ <λ <λ α p e

39.
(c) λ > λ > λ
e p He++

Explanation: de-Broglie wavelength, λ = h

P
=
h

√2m(KE)

1
∴ λ ∝
√m

As m He
++ > mp > me
λ
He
++ < λP < λe or λ e > λp > λ
He
++

40.
(d) 1.5 eV
Explanation: Given, threshold wavelength, λ = 380 nm 0

Wavelength of incident light, λ = 260 nm


Using Einstein’s relation of photoelectric effect,
(KE)max = eV0 = hv - hv0 ...(i)
But hv = E = 1237
eV
λ(nm)

∴ E0 =
1237
eV ...(ii)
λ0 (nm)

From Eqs. (i) and (ii), we get (KE)max = E - E0 ( 1237

λ

1237

λ0
) eV

= 1237 [ 1

λ

λ0
1
] eV (λ in nm) ...(iii)
By putting values of λ and λ in Eq. (iii), we get 0

(KE)max = 1237 ( 1

260

380
1
) eV
380−260
= 1237 × [ 380×260
] eV
⇒ (KE)max = 1.5 eV

41.
λA
(d) λB
= 2

Explanation: For elastic collision,


Pbefore collision = Pafter collision
mv = mvA + m

2
vB

2v = 2vA + vB ...(i)
vB − vA
Now, coefficient of restitution, e = u − uB
A

Here, uB = 0 (Particle at rest) and for elastic collisions = 1


vB − vA
∴ 1 =
v

⇒ v = vB - vA ...(ii)
From Eq. (i) and Eq. (ii)
vA
= and v =
v

3
B
4v

h
( )
λ mV VB 4/3
Hence, A A
= = = = 2
λB h 2VA 2/3
m
V
B
2

42.
(d) 1.8
Explanation: hc

λ1
= ϕ +
1

2
m(2v )
2

hc 1 2
= ϕ + mv
λ2 2

7 / 11
hc
−ϕ
λ1
⇒ = 4
hc
−ϕ
λ
2
hc 4hc
⇒ − ϕ = − 4ϕ
λ1 λ2

4hc hc
⇒ − = 3ϕ
λ2 λ1

1 4 1
⇒ ϕ = hc ( − )
3 λ2 λ1

1 4×350−540
= × 1240 ( )
3 350×540

= 1.8eV
43.
(d) 14.14
Explanation: de-Broglie wavelength associated with a moving charged particle of charge q is λ = h

p
=
h
where, V =
√2mqV

accelerating potential

−−
λA √mB qB VB −−
m
− −
q
− VB
Ratio of de-Broglie wavelength for particle A and B is, λB
= = √
B

mA
⋅ √
B

qA
⋅ √
VA
√mA qA VA


−− −
− −
− −

q 2500
Substituting the given values, we get = √ 4m

m
⋅ √
q
⋅ √
50

= 2 × 1 × 5 × 1.414 = 14.14
44.
(b) 2λ
Explanation: De-Broglie wavelength,
2
h p
λ = (∵ K ⋅ E = )
p 2 m

h h
λ = =
√2mk⋅E √2mE

′ h 2 h
λ = = = 2λ
E √2mE
√2 m( )
4

45.
(d) 4 : 1
Explanation: De-Broglie wavelength,
h h h
λ = = =
mv
√2mK √2mqΔV
−−−−−−−
2 m p Vp q
λα p
∴ = √
λp 2 m α Vα q
α

∴ Vp = 2V and Vα = 4V (given)
mα = 4mp and qα = 2qp
−−−−−
λα 1×2×1 1
∴ = √ = ⇒ λp : λα = 4 : 1
λp 4×4×2 4

46.
(b) 1011 and 5 eV
Explanation: We know that, intensity of a radiation I with energy ‘E' incident on a plate per second per unit area is given as
dE dE
⇒ I = ⇒ IdA or IA
dA×dt dt

i.e., energy incident per unit time = IA


Substituting the given values, we get
dE

dt
= 16 × 10-3 × 1 × 10-4

= 16 × 10-7 W ...(i)
dE

dt

Using Einstein’s photoelectric equation, we can find kinetic energy of the incident radiation as
E= 1

2
mv2 + ϕ
KE = E - ϕ = 10 eV - 5 eV
⇒ KE = 5 eV ...(ii)

Now, energy per unit time for incident photons will be


∵ E = Nhν


dE

dt
= hν dN

dt
or hν ˙
N ...(iii)
From Eqs. (i) and (iii), we get

8 / 11
hν N˙ = 16 × 10-7 or EN˙ = 16 × 10-7
But E = 10 eV, so
˙
N (10 × 1.6 × 10-19) = 16 × 10-7 ⇒ N˙ = 1012
= 1011
10
∵ Only 10% of incident photons emit electrons. So, emitted electrons per second are 100
12
× 10

47.
(b) |Py|d > h
Explanation: From Bragg’s equation
d sinθ = λ
sinθ = < 1 λ

∴ λ <d
h h

∣p ∣
< d ...[∵ λ = ∣p ∣
]
∣ y∣ ∣ y∣

∴ h < |Py|d

48.
2λ1 λ2
(c) λ CM =
2 2
√λ + λ
1 2

Explanation: Momentum (p) of each electron h

λt
^
i and h

λ2
^
j

Velocity of centre of mass


Vcm = h

2 mλi
^
i +
2 mλ2
h ^
j (∵ p = mv)
Velocity of 1 st particle about centre of mass
V1cm = h

2 mλ1
^
i −
2 mλ2
h ^
j

h 2λ1 λ2 h
λcm = = (∵ λ = )
p
h2 h2 2
√λ + λ
2
+ 1 2

2 2
4λ 4λ
1 2

49. (a) 4 : 1
Explanation: deBroglie wavelength, λ = mv
h

Given, λ = P λα


mp vp
h
=
mα vα
h
⇒ mpvp = m α vα

vp
⇒ mpvp = 4mpv α ⇒

= 4 (∴ m = 4 mp) α

50.
Ee v
(d) Eph
=
2c

1 2
mv
KE of electron 1 mv h
Explanation:
2
= = v × ×
KE of photon hv 2 h hv

h hc
But mv
=
hv
mv hv
∴ =
h hc

Ee 1 mv h c
∴ = v[ ⋅ ⋅ ]
Eph 2 h hv c

1 hv hc 1 v
= v[ ⋅ ⋅ ] =
2 hc hv c 2c

51.
o

(d) 0.24 A
−−−
Explanation: Rms speed of gas molecule, Vrms = √ 3kT

h h
de Broglie wavelength, λ = p
=
√2mk

h h h
∴ λ = = =
1 2 3 √3mkT
√2m× m Vrms √m× kT
2 2

Substituting the respective values we get


o
−34

λ =
6.63×10
= 0.24 A
√3×4.64× 10−26 ×1.38× 10−23 ×400

9 / 11
52.
(c) 1.45 × 106 m/s
8
c 3×10
Explanation: Wavelength of the given photon is given as, λ p =
vp
=
14
m
6×10

= 5 × 10-7m ...(i)
As, it is given that, de-Broglie wavelength of the electron is λ = 10-3 × λ [∵ using Eq. (i)] e p

=5× 10-10m
Also, the de-Broglie wavelength of an electron is given as, λ e
=
h

p
=
h

mve
⇒ ve =
h

λe me
−34

Substituting the given values, we get = 6.63×10

−10 −31
m/s
5× 10 ×9.1× 10

= 1.45 × 106 m/s

53.
(d) 0.615eV
Explanation: As K.Emax = hc

λ
− ϕ

So, K 1 =
1230

800
− ϕ ...(i) [∵ hc

λ
=
1240
]
λ(nm)

2 K1 =
1230

500
− ϕ ...(ii)
Multiplying (i) by 2 and subtracting it from (ii)
1230 1230
( − ) eV = ϕ
400 500

⇒ ϕ = 0.615 eV
54.

(c) 2

Explanation: Relation between stopping potential and incident light’s frequency is eV0 = hf - ϕ 0

where, V0 is the stopping potential and ϕ is the the work function of the photosensitive surface.
0

So, from given data, we have,


V0
−e
2
= hv − ϕ0 ...(i)
hv
and −eV 0 =
2
− ϕ0 ...(ii)
Subtracting Eqs. (i) from (ii), we have
eV0 hv eV0 hv
−eV0 − (− ) = − hv ⇒ − = −
2 2 2 2

⇒ eV0 = hv
eV0
Substituting this in Eq. (i), we get − 2
= eV0 − ϕ0

⇒ −(
3

2
eV0 ) = − ϕ0 or 3

2
hv = ϕ0

If threshold frequency is V0 then hv0 = 3

2
hv ⇒ v0 = 3

2
v

55. (a) 1.66 eV


Explanation:
Given,
Planck’s constant, h = 6.63 × 10-34 J-s
e = 1.6 × 10-19 C
and there is a graph between stopping potential and frequency.
We need to determine work function W
Using Einstein’s relation of photoelectric effect,
(KE)max = eV0 = hv - hv0 = hv - W [∵ W = hv0]
or V 0 =
h

e
v −
W

From graph at V0 = 0 and v = 4 × 1014 Hz

10 / 11
−34
6.63×10 14 W
∴ 0 = × 4 × 10 −
e e
−34 14
W 6.63× 10 ×4× 10
⇒ =
e e

or W = 6.63 × 4 × 10-20 J
−20
6.63×4×10
or W = −19
eV = 1.657 eV
1.6×10

∴ W = 1.66 eV

56.
(c) 12 × 1020
Explanation: As we know
E nhv n IAλ n ρλ n
I = = ⇒ = ⇒ = ⇒ = ρλ
At At t hC t hc t

n n p2 λ2 P 800
20 20
⇒ ( ) = ( ) × = 9 × 10 × × = 12 × 10
t 2 t 1 p λ1 P 600
1

57. (a) 500


1

Explanation: Given,
Wavelength of X-rays, λ = 1 nm = 1 × 10-9m 1

Wavelength of visible light, λ = 500 × 10-9m 2

The number of photons emitted per second from a source of monochromatic radiation of wavelength λ and power P is given as
n= = P

E
= ...(∵ E = hν and ν = )
P Pλ c

hν hc λ

⇒ Clearly n ∝ λ
n1 λ1 1
⇒ = =
n2 λ2 500

58.
(d) (A)-(ii); (B)-(i); (C)-(iii)
Explanation: Frank-Hertz experiment - Discrete energy levels of an atom, Photoelectric effect - Particle nature of light.
Davison - Germer experiment - wave nature of the electron.
59.
(d) 1836
Explanation: de-broglie wavelength, λ = h

λe =
h

me ×v
and λ p
=
h

mp ×v

λe mp 1836me
∴ = = = 1836
λp me me

60.
(c) 1 : 43
Explanation: de-Broglie wavelength, λ = h

√2mKE

λp −

m
− −−−
m
−−−
1 e e
∴ λ ∝ ∴ = √ = √ = 1 : 43
√m λe mp 1849 m e

11 / 11

You might also like