+baader Test Anti Fringing Filters
+baader Test Anti Fringing Filters
Planetarium
Anti-Fringing
Filters
The Fringe Killer, Semi-APO and
Contrast-Booster Compared
By Gary Parkerson
I’ve tested three quality achromatic excellent refractors, each exhibiting less Booster. I also had the Baader
refractors extensively in recent years: (1) chromatic aberration than I judge ac- Neodymium Moon & Skyglow filter on
Hands On Optics’ Astro Telescopes ceptable in achromats of their respective hand to stack with the Fringe Killer, a
AT102F11, the same 102-mm f/11 apertures and focal ratios – even the fast strategy I’d learned as a loyal reader of
“Super Planetary” refractor covered in AT1523. Sky & Telescope.
the March-April 2011 issue of ATT; (2) Nevertheless, each produced enough
an Astro Telescopes AT1523, Hands On color fringing at high magnification on Thomas Dobbins Intro-
Optics’ 152-mm f/5.9 rich-field refrac- brightest objects to warrant anti-fring- duces Me to Stacking
tor covered in the September-October ing filters. While working with the For the past 10 years, I’ve used the
2012 issue; and (3) a classic 6-inch f/15 AT102F11, I took the opportunity to Baader Moon & Skyglow filter more
long-focus refractor with Jaegers objec- test each of Baader Planetarium’s current than any other in my nightly casual
tive that I helped my local astronomy trio of anti-fringing filters: the Fringe viewing. It tames the mild light pollu-
club refurbished several years ago. All are Killer, the Semi-APO and the Contrast- tion of my favorite observing site with-
Neodymium filters worked well, but Neodymium substrate of the Moon & Grant’s imaging rig, and asked that he share
stacking them is just one more thing Skyglow filter, combining the benefits of his impressions using the Fringe Killer,
I’d rather not have to do, so the Semi- the stacked Fringe Killer-Moon & Sky- Contrast-Booster and Semi-APO filters. I’d
APO sounded like a real winner. I called glow filters without the hassles already tested the Semi-APO extensively
Bob Luffel of Alpine Astronomical, of threading two filters together. Its and concluded it was my favorite of the
Baader’s U.S. distributor, and requested transmission spectrum is shown in three. Its performance reminded me of the
one, along with fresh samples of Image 2, again compared to the solar stacked Fringe Killer/Neodymium combi-
the Fringe Killer and Moon & Skyglow. spectrum. Image 3 is shows the trans- nation that had satisfied me since 2004, so
Although I’d long ago rejected the mission spectrum of the Moon & Sky- that was no surprise.
Contrast-Booster based upon Thomas glow above the Sun’s. Austin is an astrophotographer and is
Dobbins’ 2004 report, I figured I so focused on that activity that he rarely
might as well compare it to the others Baader Contrast-Booster looks through a telescope. I reasoned that
while at it, if only to confirm their Alpine Astro describes the Contrast- his mind’s eye would, unlike mine, not be
superiority. Booster as “… an aggressive filter, de- prejudiced by expectations generated by
signed to deliver the maximum years of through-the-eyepiece viewing. But
Baader Fringe Killer sharpness and contrast possible from an I still expected him to agree that the Baader
The Fringe Killer is the least aggres- achromat. The result is complete re- Semi-APO produced the most pleasing
sive of Baader’s anti-fringing options, moval of the violet haze, with a some- views. He studied Sirius sans filter and
formulated to attenuate the most dis- what dimmer and yellower image. The through each of the three Baader anti-fring-
tracting defocused wavelengths while re- Contrast-Booster also incorporates addi- ing filters – back and forth, from one to an-
taining maximum image brightness and tional RGB filtration for further en- other – and judged all successful in
overall color fidelity. My observations hancing color contrasts.” That it canceling the violet fringe to a satisfying de-
confirmed these essential characteristics. completely removes violet fringing is a gree, but kept coming back to the Con-
Although not as color-neutral as the bold claim, and one I read with initial trast-Booster, which he finally declared the
Semi-Apo, it was noticeably more so skepticism – even as I appreciated winner. He repeated the lengthy evaluation
than the Contrast Booster. It reduced vi- Alpine’s confirmation that the filter pro- on Jupiter and still felt that the Contrast-
olet fringing significantly on bright ob- duced the “dimmer and yellower” image Booster provided the sharpest, most violet-
jects, but not entirely. Image 1 shows revealed by Thomas Dobbins’ photos. The free and pleasing views.
the spectrum transmitted by the Fringe Contrast-Booster’s transmission spectrum To my eye, the Contrast-Booster did
Killer as revealed by an MPI-DADOS is shown above the full solar spectrum in indeed yield the least violet fringing, but
spectrograph compared to the solar spec- Image 4. still at the cost of a decidedly yellowish
trum below. overall hue. The cooler hues produced by
Two Eyes Are Better the Semi-APO filter better fit my precon-
Baader Semi-APO Than One ceived notions of ideal views. Austin had
The Semi-APO filter overlays a I set up the Astro Telescopes 102-mm no such preconceptions, so reacted solely
slightly more aggressive version of the f/11 refractor on a night in late November, to the net reduction of fringing. Or so I
Fringe Killer coatings onto the 2011, next to ATT Associate Editor Austin thought.
Image 5 - DSLR image of sunlight glinting from a headlight shot Image 6 - Sunlit headlight through the AT102F11 and Baader’s
through the AT102F11 without filter. Fringe Killer anti-fringing filter.
Image 7 - The same headlight through the AT102F11 and the Image 8 - Image captured after adding Baader’s Contrast-Booster.
Baader Semi-APO filter. This aggressive filter removed all visible violet fringing.
When Eyes Don’t Agree, university, planning to photograph the sun you to view them instead in ATT’s online
Resort to Photography glinting off a street lamp, but the school’s digital version.
We shot multiple photos of Sirius dark-sky-friendly lighting shielded the re- Image 5 is typical of the sharpest focus
through the 102-mm f/11 achro using an flective glass surfaces from direct sunlight – we could achieve in a single, unprocessed
unmodified Canon T2i DLSR, but the re- not so the exposed headlamps of the cars image across the sun-heated asphalt of the
sulting images were too inconclusive to set- parked there. We targeted a particularly parking lot, but tells the tale of the chro-
tle the debate, so I won’t share them here. clean sample on the far side of the lot and matic aberration exhibited by the 102-mm
We met the next day to take daylight im- hoped its owner wouldn’t drive away before achromat on a very bright object without
ages through the Baader filters using the we’d completed the project. benefit of an anti-fringing filter. The violet
same scope and camera. My guess is that the newsprint interior fringing is minimal considering the bright-
We set up in a shaded spot at the pages of this magazine will not do the ac- ness of the reflected sunlight, testament to
edge of a large parking lot at our local companying images justice, so I encourage the quality of the little refractor, but it is
SUBSCRIBE NOW!!!
BUY A FRIEND
A GIFT
SUBSCRIPTION!
ASTRONOMY
TECHNOLOGY TODAY
www.astronomytechnologytoday.com