Access To Health Care in Patients With Psoriasis - 2013 - Journal of The Americ
Access To Health Care in Patients With Psoriasis - 2013 - Journal of The Americ
Access To Health Care in Patients With Psoriasis - 2013 - Journal of The Americ
P6834
Cost-effectiveness of biologic therapies for plaque psoriasis: A systematic
review
Christine Ahn, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem, NC, United
States; Cheryl Gustafson, MD, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem,
NC, United States; Scott Davis, Wake Forest School of Medicine, Winston-Salem,
NC, United States; Steven Feldman, MD, PhD, Wake Forest School of Medicine,
Winston-Salem, NC, United States
Background: The use of biologic agents has changed the therapeutic management of
severe plaque psoriasis. In addition to clinical efficacy, biologics are associated with
higher costs than traditional therapy. Therefore, when assessing the clinical efficacy
of biologic agents, it is important to consider their cost-effectiveness.
Purpose: To determine the cost-effectiveness of biologic agents, measured by the
cost per patient achieving a minimally important difference in the Dermatology Life
Quality Index (MID DLQI) and cost per patient achieving a 75% improvement in the
P7122 Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI-75).
The versatility of the nasolabial transposition flap in midfacial recon-
Methods: A PubMed literature search was conducted to identify randomized
struction: Our experience placebo-controlled clinical trials describing the efficacy of FDA-approved biologic
Diogo Matos, MD, Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal; Jo~ao Goul~ao, MD, therapies. Cost-effectiveness was determined by the cost per patient achieving a
Hospital Garcia de Orta, Almada, Portugal MID DLQI and PASI-75 after 12 weeks of treatment. A sensitivity analysis was
The nasolabial flap is an ellipse-shaped transposition flap centered in the performed to compare cost-effectiveness ratios. Treatment paradigms were extrap-
nasolabial fold. Technically not very demanding, it has a high viability and a olated to estimate cost-effectiveness of 1 year of treatment.
favourable security profile because of its vascularization by the angular artery Results: Twenty-seven trials evaluating adalimumab, alefacept, etanercept, inflix-
and the depth of the surrounding nervous structures. Superiorly based nasola- imab, and ustekinumab were included in this study. Infliximab 3 mg/kg IV (weeks 0,
bial flaps can be used for reconstruction of a wide range of midfacial surgical 2, and 6) was the most cost-effective agent achieving a MID DLQI at 12 weeks,
defects. At our dermatology department, during the year of 2010, 78 flaps were followed by etanercept 25 mg SQ once weekly and infliximab 5 mg/kg IV. The most
performed in the setting of reconstructive oncologic surgery of the face, 48 of cost-effective agents achieving a PASI-75 were infliximab 3 mg/kg IV and
them in the midfacial area. Of these, 20 (42%) were nasolabial flaps, which adalimumab 40 mg SQ every other week (with or without 80-mg loading dose).
were used mainly for nasal reconstruction (18) but also for infraorbitary defects. The annual cost of biologic treatment ranged from $6800 for low dose alefacept to
This flap was used for all the anatomic subunits of the nose, including the $56,000 for high dose ustekinumab. Infliximab 3 mg/kg IV had the lowest annual
dorsum and the tip, at least once. In addition to its classical usage as a cost per patient achieving both a MID DLQI and PASI-75. The least cost-effective
transposition flap, the nasolabial flap was also used as a turn-in and turn-over treatment paradigm for DLQI and PASI outcomes was alefacept.
flap for the nasal ala, and as a tunnelled flap for the tip of the nose. No cases of
loss of viability or major surgical complications were reported. All patients had Limitations: This study is limited by the lack of head-to-head trials that determine
a follow-up of $ 1 year, and the majority showed a very satisfactory cosmetic accurate relative efficacies. In addition, this study did not incorporate indirect costs
and functional outcome, without the need of reintervention. The analysis of our or variation in costs caused by insurance company contracting.
data highligts the versatility of the nasolabial flap in the midfacial reconstruction Conclusion: Infliximab 3 mg/kg IV had the most favorable cost-effectiveness profile,
as this flap was used in surgical defects affecting different structures of the with the lowest cost per patient achieving both a MID DLQI and PASI-75. Other
midface, particularly the nose. Because of its versatility, viability, and security biologic agents foundd small differences in cost-effectiveness, likely to be over-
profile, the nasolabial flap is a must-know flap for all the dermatologic surgeons, whelmed by individual variation, insurance company price contracting, and the
because it constitutes a very useful and easy to master tool in facial uncertainty inherent with the lack of head-to-head trials to determine relative
reconstruction. efficacy.