DCP Pschological Services Clinical Guidelines Undertaking Psychological Assessments
DCP Pschological Services Clinical Guidelines Undertaking Psychological Assessments
DCP Pschological Services Clinical Guidelines Undertaking Psychological Assessments
Scope
This procedure applies to all DCP psychologists (to be referred to herein as psychologists) undertaking
psychological assessments and writing associated reports. They should be read in conjunction with the Clinical
Guidelines for undertaking Psychological Assessment with Aboriginal Families within DCP for guidance
regarding working with Aboriginal children, young people and families.
Authority
3.1 Legislative context
The Children and Young People (Safety) Act 2017 (CYPS Act) ensures that keeping children and young people
safe fromharmis paramount. In addition to this, the following needs of children and young people are also to
be considered:
(a) the need to be heard and have their views considered;
(b) the need for love and attachment;
(c) the need for self-esteem;
(d) the need to achieve their full potential.
Children and young people connection with their biological family is considered desirable by the CYPS Act
also, where this does not undermine the other needs listed above.
Key principles of intervention and placement are detailed in the CYPS Act. The principles of intervention
include timely decision-making and permanency planning, the participation of children and young people in
decision-making, consideration of the culture, disability, language and religion of children and young people,
and the use of family group conferences. The placement principles are that children and young people should
be placed in a safe, nurturing, stable and secure environment; with preference for placement with someone
they shared an existing relationship with, and the involvement of approved carers in decision-making. The
Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Placement Principle is detailed, which aims to maintain the
connection of Aboriginal children and young people with their family and culture, to enable Aboriginal people
to participate in the care and protection of their children and young people and to encourage partnership in
decision making. Refer to the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Placement Principle practice paper for
detailed information.
3.4 Principles
? The safety of children and young people is the paramount consideration.
? Observe the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Placement Principle and core elements.
? Timely, accurate information gathering and holistic assessment is crucial to meeting the needs of children
and young people.
? Assessment respects cultural diversity in parenting practices while maintaining a focus on safety.
? Families hold important knowledge of their own lives, needs and culture.
? Children and young people views are sought and considered.
? Respect, compassion and cultural responsiveness underpins engagement.
? Decision making is child and young person centred.
? Decisions and actions are undertaken in a timely manner.
? Statutory authority is used responsibly and in the least intrusive way to ensure the safety of the children
and young people.
? Aboriginal children and young people have a right to know and participate in their culture to support their
physical, spiritual, social and emotional wellbeing.
? Connections with family, community, language, religion, culture are key to nurturing children and young
people sense of identity.
Procedure requirements
4.1 Context of child protection
4.1.1 Agencies associated with child protection
? DCP: is the agency mandated to receive notifications of harm or risk of harm, investigate allegations and
make decisions regarding children and young people care and protection based on the CYPS Act.
? Child Protection Services (CPS) (located at Women and Children Hospital, Flinders Medical Centre and
Lyell McEwin Hospital): The CPSs provide medical and psychosocial assessments, and forensic/evidential
interviewing of children under the age of seven years following allegations of harm. Therapy for children is
also provided by these agencies. Referrals are received from DCP and SAPOL.
? South Australian Police (SAPOL): Child Abuse Investigators, who are part of Child and Family Investigation
Units in various Local Service Areas, are detectives who are trained in the investigation of allegations of
child abuse from the criminal perspective. SAPOL conduct forensic interviews with children and young
people over the age of 7 years.
? Courts: The Magistrates Court, District Court, Supreme Court, Youth Court, Federal Circuit and Family Court
of Australia all hear cases that could involve child abuse. The police prosecute criminal cases in the
Magistrates, District and Supreme Court, and in the Youth Court in relation to juvenile offending. DCP seeks
orders regarding children and young people care and protection fromthe Youth Court and, at times, such
matters are also heard in the Supreme Court. Individual families seek decisions about who the child or
young person will live withand time spending arrangements fromthe Federal Circuit and Family Court. DCP
sometimes makes representations in the Federal Circuit and Family Court regarding children and young
people about whomconcerns exist.
? South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal (SACAT): undertakes reviews of certain decisions made
by DCP.
? Child and Adolescent Mental Health Services (CAMHS): CAMHS provides therapy to children and young
people (frominfancy to 18 years) and their carers. Paediatric psychiatric assessment and inpatient services
are also provided by CAMHS.
? Headspace: Headspace provides early intervention mental health services to 12 to 25 year olds.
? Department for Human Services (DHS): DHS funds and delivers a range of early intervention services for
families and children under the Child and Family Support System(CFSS). DHS provides support to children
and families at risk of harm, neglect and family violence by deliberately and strongly intervening. This work
aims to disrupt the patterns of intergenerational trauma, and to increase the number of children able to
be cared for safely in their birth family
? Drug and Alcohol Services South Australia (DASSA): DASSA is a statewide health service that offers a range
of prevention, treatment and information services for people with alcohol, tobacco and other drug issues.
? Non-government organisations (NGOs), Aboriginal Community Controlled Organisations (ACCOs) and for
profit organisations: There are numerous NGOs and for profit organisations that are responsible for
providing foster care to children and young people who cannot safely live with their families. These
agencies are also responsible for the training and support of foster carers. Aboriginal Family Support
Services (AFSS) provide foster care specifically for Aboriginal children. A range of other NGO agencies
provide therapeutic placements of children and young people with complex needs. A range of ACCOs
provide placement support for kinship carers caring for Aboriginal children and young people. DCP Kinship
Care also provide support for kinship carers.
? A range of agencies providereunificationservices to assist birthfamilies to improve their parenting capacity
and ability to keep their children safe.
? In addition to DCP Residential Care, a number of agencies provide residential care for children and young
people.
4.1.4 Internal Reviews and the South Australian Civil and Administrative Tribunal
(SACAT)
Internal review
Certain decisions made by DCP can be subject to an Internal Review. These decisions are referred to as
decisions These decisions are:
? All decisions made under Chapter 7 of CYPS Act, excluding a decision made under Part 4 of that Chapter
(being decisions about contact arrangements).
? Decisions made under Section 25A of the Births, Deaths and Marriages Registration Act 1996.
? Decisions made under section 153 of CYPS Act (to refuse to provide a document or information, or to
provide a document in redacted form). These reviews are managed by the DCP Freedom of Information
team.
In an Internal Review, the reviewer will consider the legislative framework and whether the legal
power/discretion has been exercised in a way that is consistent with policy and procedures and is procedurally
fair.
At times, DCP Psychological Services leadership complete internal reviews.
External review
Application can be made to SACAT for review of a range of decisions made by DCP, with a full list available
here SACAT reviewable decisions.
SACAT also hears applications for guardianship and administration orders for people over 18 years of age who
are unable to make certain decisions about their personal health, financial, legal, and living circumstances due
to mental incapacity. SACAT can appoint a guardian under a guardianship order to make accommodation,
health and lifestyle decisions and an administrator under an administration order to make legal, financial and
business decisions to support a person who has mental incapacity.
DCP Psychological Services largely has contact with SACAT regarding review of decisions regarding a child or
young person placement and approval of carers, and regarding guardianship and administration orders for
young people aging out of DCP care and requiring additional support due to mental incapacity.
At times, previous psychological assessment reports are used within SACAT hearings and, occasionally, further
assessments are sought to provide expert evidence to support an application to SACAT. Psychologists may be
called to present evidence within a SACAT hearing.
4.2.2 Protocol for assessing children or young people who are still residing with
their biological parents or in a placement which is subject to care concerns
Whether or not to conduct an assessment of a child or young person who still reside with their birth parents
or in a placement that is subject to multiple care concerns (especially a parenting capacity assessment)
requires careful consideration. To assist navigation of this complex situation, a list of issues for
consideration and a suggested process are provided below.
Considerations:
?
Process
Given the complex issues that need consideration in this situation, the following process is suggested:
When determining whether an assessment is needed while the child or young person remains in the care of
their parents or carers, a planning meeting involving the DCP case worker, their supervisor and psychologist
allocated to the office should be organised. The goal of this meeting is to ascertain if there is an urgent need
for an assessment and whether the benefits of conducting an assessment outweigh the inherent risks of doing
so. It is essential to cover the following topics during the planning meeting:
a. clarification of the allegations or concerns and child protection history
b. the necessity and urgency of an assessment
c. immediate safety needs for the child or young person and urgency to act
d. the presence of any other dangers or risks in the household (domestic and family violence, mental
health difficulties, disability, substance misuse)
e. the presence of protective persons or factors
f. urgent information that is required to assess risk to the child or young person safety
g. any safety issues for staff attending the home.
If a decision is made that the assessment should proceed (following a discussion of the above issues), there is
a need to establish an agreed upon safety threshold beyond which the risk to the children is considered
unmanageable (for example, disclosures of ongoing abuse by the child or young person during interview) and
specific steps which will be taken in response (such as consideration to the need to remove the child or young
person immediately or stop the assessment).
If the agreed threshold is deemed as being reached by anyone involved in the planning meeting, a follow-up
meeting should be urgently organised to discuss the concerns and enact previously agreed steps. The
assessment process is likely to need to be placed on hold until this can occur. Resumption of the assessment
can be negotiated when the child or young person at least conditional safety has been restored.
?
?
?
?
?
?
If the necessary information is not contained within the documents identified by the DCP case worker, further
information can be gathered fromthe following sources:
? Discussion with the referring DCP case worker and, if applicable, other psychologists who have had
involvement in the matter.
? C3MS: C3MS is DCP electronic case management system that contains all documentation produced or
received fromother agencies by DCP.
? Psychology (55) Files: 55 files are only accessible to psychologists.
It is important to focus on the referral question and have a clear idea about what is required to prepare a
concise two to three page background section. Avoid time consuming and detailed background information
searches in C3MS. Psychologists are encouraged to start their background information review by relying on
the main documents and only explore C3MS notes to fill in any gaps.
assessments could always be more comprehensive, psychologists should aim to practice efficiently and only
collect the data required to address the referral questions.
If a child, young person or family is Aboriginal, it will be necessary to consult with the Principal Aboriginal
Consultant (PAC) or other appropriate staff or community member to ensure that the assessment is conducted
in a manner that is culturally safe1. Refer to the Clinical Guidelines for undertaking Psychological Assessment
with Aboriginal Families within DCP and the Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander Child Placement Principle
practice paper for guidance. If a child, young person or family are from a culturally and linguistically diverse
background, cultural consultation with DCP Multicultural Services, an appropriate body or community
member is recommended to ensure the assessment is conducted in a culturally appropriate manner. See the
Working with Diversity Culturally and linguistically diverse people Practice Paper for more information.
It is recommended that the relevant consent forms for exchange of information with professionals and
agencies be provided to the DCP case worker and it be requested that they seek any necessary signed consent
as soon as possible. This allows for timely completion of interviews with professionals. Interviews with
professionals are generally conducted via telephone or Teams.
The scheduling of assessment sessions can be complex and many factors should be considered. Time efficiency
is important and travel should be minimised. To achieve an efficient assessment, multiple assessment sessions
should be conducted on each day.
It is also important to consider the child or young person schedule and prepare an assessment schedule
which is the least disruptive as possible. For example, it is recommended that the psychologist observe the
usual family contact visit and plan their assessment sessions around this where possible rather than request
changes to family contact.
Collateral information should be obtained to inform t
young person, considering their developmental needs
1 Psychologists should refer to the Clinical Guidelines for undertaking Psychological Assessment with
Aboriginal Families within DCP for more information about conducting culturally appropriate assessments.
he Relationship Based Practice and Supporting the participation of children and young people in
decision making practice papers offer helpful guidance.
When writing interview plans, psychologists should also reflect on whether questions:
?
?
?
?
Psychologists are encouraged to discuss some examples of their interview plans in supervision periodically.
2 Please refer to the Clinical Guidelines for undertaking Psychological Assessment with Aboriginal Families
within DCP for more information about conducting culturally appropriate assessments.
For adults,
If there are concerns regarding a parent mental health, possible measures may include:
?
?
?
?
?
?
If there are concerns regarding a parent or carer cognitive functioning, measures may include:
?
?
?
?
Psychologists should carefully consider the child or young person needs and the parent ability to meet
those needs. This requires assessment of the child or young person - see of the child or young
person attachment and family relationships of child development of the child or
young person intellectual, adaptive, and academic functioning of the child or young person
emotional and behavioural functioning and of the impact of abuse on the child or young person
4.3.3 Assessment of the risk of sexual offending against the child or young person
Assessing the risk of sexual offending may be necessary when there is a reasonable suspicion that a parent or
carer has perpetrated child sexual abuse and consideration is being given to that parent or carer either caring
for or having family contact with the child or young person.
Given the sensitive and somewhat intrusive nature of questions associated with assessing risk of sexual
offending, It is strongly
recommended that psychologists discuss their interview plans with a principal or senior psychologist.
It should be noted that many of the following assessment topics have been identified as being correlated with
the risk of recidivismamongst known offenders.
Interview with the person suspected of child sexual abuse regarding their:
?
?
?
?
?
?
Should a formal assessment of mental health or intellectual functioning be required, please refer to
capacity assessment for possible measures.
Should a formal assessment of mental health or intellectual functioning be required, please refer to
capacity assessment for possible measures.
. Discussion
ortant.
Refer to the Clinical Guidelines for undertaking Psychological Assessment with Aboriginal Families within DCP
for detailed information to consider when assessing Aboriginal families. Consultation with a Principal
Aboriginal Consultant is recommended.
If possible, interview the child or young person regarding:
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Formal assessment measures to be used with child and young people may include:
?
Psychologists should conduct observation of the interaction between the child and parent and/or child or
young person carer (see section an observation of parent/carer-child interactions
If the childor young person relationship with a parent or prospective carer is being assessed for consideration
of future care arrangements, interview themregarding:
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
At times, DCP case workers request that psychologists observe contact visits during consultation. It is generally
recommended that a psychologist does not observe interactions between a child and their parent or carer in
isolation of other assessment methods. If recommendations cannot be confidently made regarding contact
arrangements through consultation alone, a full assessment of these arrangements is likely the most
appropriate option. This ensures that the purpose of the assessment (and included observation) is
appropriately communicated with the clients, consent provided, and other necessary information is obtained
through methods such as interviews and reviewof documentation. The assessment and recommendations are
then documented within a report.
Refer to the Clinical Guidelines for undertaking Psychological Assessment with Aboriginal Families within DCP
for detailed information to consider when assessing Aboriginal families. Consultation with a Principal
Aboriginal Consultant is recommended.
An observation of interactions between the child or young person and significant adult(s) should consider:
The child or young person The parent or carer
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Psychologists undertaking assessments of arrangements for family contact visits should also consider the issues
raised in for consideration regarding recommendations for family contact arrangements for children and
young people
Interview with child carer and/or parent to gain information regarding the child
?
?
?
?
?
?
Consider using a formal measure with the child carer such as:
?
?
?
?
Refer to the Clinical Guidelines for undertaking Psychological Assessment with Aboriginal Families within DCP
for detailed information to consider when assessing Aboriginal families. Consultation with a Principal
Aboriginal Consultant is recommended.
Interview the child or young person carer and/or parent regarding the child or young person
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Interview the child or young person class teacher to assess the child or young person
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
4.3.10 Assessment of the young person intellectual and adaptive functioning for
preparation for transition fromcare
In preparation for a young person transition fromcare at 18 years, assessment can be required to
determine their functioning and support needs. This assessment may be required to support the young
person eligibility for services. It may also be required to determine whether a SACAT administration and/or
guardianship order is required to support the young person to manage their finances, legal issues, medical
and psychiatric treatment, accommodation, and other health and lifestyle decisions due to mental
incapacity.
For orders to be considered by SACAT, an application formcompleted and signed by a psychologist (or a
doctor) is required. Completion of this formdoes not necessitate a formal assessment if previous
assessments have confirmed the mental incapacity. However, review of the information on file, a brief
interview with young person, and possibly carer/member of care team is required. Where no previous
formal assessment has been completed and concerns are held about the young person capacity and needs,
a formal assessment is recommended.
Refer to the Clinical Guidelines for undertaking Psychological Assessment with Aboriginal Families within DCP
for detailed information to consider when assessing Aboriginal young people. Consultation with a Principal
Aboriginal Consultant is recommended.
Interview the young person carer regarding the young person
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Refer to the Clinical Guidelines for undertaking Psychological Assessment with Aboriginal Families within DCP
for detailed information to consider when assessing Aboriginal children and young people. Consultation with
a Principal Aboriginal Consultant is recommended.
If possible, interview the child or young person regarding the following:
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Interview the child or young person primary carer (or preferred carer if there are many) regarding the child
or young person
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Interview the child or young person teacher regarding the child or young person
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
Consider using a behaviour rating scale with the teacher such as:
?
It may also be useful to observe the child or young person in various settings, such as their foster home, during
visits or at school or kindergarten.
A useful reference may be:
? Sattler, J.M. (1998). Clinical and Forensic Interviewing of Children and Families, California: Jerome M.
Sattler, Publisher, Inc.
It should be noted that many children or young people will experience emotional disturbance in response to
discussing their experiences of abuse during assessments.
With regard to all forms of abuse, consider interviewing the child or young person regarding:
?
?
?
For all forms of abuse, the child or young person and carer should also be interviewed regarding:
?
?
?
With regard to physical and emotional abuse and neglect, consider interviewing the child or young person
regarding:
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
With regard to assessing the impact of sexual abuse,
If the child or young person discloses sexual abuse previously unknown to DCP during the course of an
interview
. Rather, psychologists should seek to gather sufficient information to make a notification
and to understand the impact of the abuse on the child or young person (if necessary, CPS or SAPOL will
conduct a forensic interview with the child or young person). See the Reporting a suspicion a child or young
person is at risk Procedure for more information.
?
?
?
?
?
?
Consider using specific tools such as:
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
?
The combination of many of these factors listed above form the assessment of a parent capacity to change.
While the Youth Court is at times reluctant to grant a long-term order without previous short orders,
this should not deter psychologists from recommending that DCP attempt to secure the child or young
person's long-termcare arrangements if this is assessed to be in the child or young person best interests.
Further useful references may be:
? DCP Practice Approach Permanency Planning Practice Paper
? DCP Practice Approach Attachment Practice Paper
? DCP Practice Approach Reunification Practice Paper
? Gauthier, Y., Fortin, G. & Jeliu, G. (2004). Clinical application of attachment theory in permanency
planning for children in foster care: The importance of continuity of care. Infant Mental Health
Journal, 25(4), 379-396.
? Reder, P., Duncan, S., & Lucey, C. (Eds) (2003). Studies in the Assessment of Parenting. London:
Routledge.
? Reder, P. & Lucey, C. (Eds) (1995). Assessment of Parenting: Psychiatric and Psychological
Contributions. London: Routledge.
o
o
o
o
o
o
Further references to consider in determining arrangements for family contact visits include:
? Baker, T. (1995). What constitutes reasonable contact? In P. Reder & C. Lucey (Eds.) Assessment of
parenting: Psychiatric and psychological contributions. London: Routledge.
? Cherry, D. (1994). Access for the child in alternative care, Children Australia, 19(1), 23-26.
? Foord, H. (1987). Access: The links between children in care and their families. The School of Applied
Social Studies, University of Bristol.
? Humphreys, C. & Kiraly, M. (2011) High-frequency family contact: a road to nowhere for infants.
Child & Family Social Work, 16, pp. 1-11.
? Humphreys, C. & Kiraly, M. (2009) Baby on Board: Report of the infants in care and family contact
research report. University of Melbourne.
? Jones, E. & Parkinson, P. (1995). Child sexual abuse, access and the wishes of children, International
Journal ofLaw and the Family, 9, 54-85.
? Neil, E. & Howe, D. (2004). Contact in adoption and permanent foster care. London: BAAF Adoption and
Fostering.
interests.
With regard to placement transitions, please refer to the Manual of Practice transition planning guidance.
The following information may also be useful to consider when making recommendations regarding
transitions.
This process requires both sets of carers to be supportive of the child or young person and
the process and may require careful planning by the psychologist and DCP case worker.
Test Selection
?
For children aged 5 years and over:
Cognitive Measures
?
?
?
?
?
Adaptive Measures
?
?
Academic Measures
?
DSM-5-TR Diagnostic Categories
Global Developmental Delay (F88)
Intellectual Developmental Disorder (Intellectual Disability; specifiers - F70 Mild; F71 Moderate; F72 Severe;
F73 Profound)
Specific Learning Disorder (specifiers - F81.0 With impairment in reading; F81.81 With impairment in written
expression; F81.2 With impairment in mathematics)
When using specifiers, also note the subskills that are impaired fromthe following:
With impairment in reading:
?
?
?
With impairment in written expression:
?
?
?
With impairment in mathematics:
?
?
?
?
References:
? American Psychiatric Association. (2013). Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders (5th
ed.). U.S.A.
? Beal, A.L., Holdnack, J.A., Saklofske, D.H. & Weiss, L.G. (2016) Practical Considerations in WISC-V
Interpretation and Intervention. In WISC-V Assessment and Interpretation, pp 63-93.
? Boat, T. F & Wu, J. T. (eds.) (2015) Clinical Characteristics of Intellectual Disabilities. In Mental
Disorders and Disabilities Among Low-Income Children. National Academies Press (US).
? Kilpatrick, D. (2018) Differential Diagnosis of SLD Versus Other Difficulties. In Essentials of Specific
Learning Disability Identification, Second edition. John Wiley & Sons.
? Patel, D.R., Apple, R., Kanungoi, S. & Akkal, A. (2018). Intellectual disability: definitions, evaluation and
principles oftreatment. Pediatric Medicine (Vol. 1).
? Summer Foundation. (2018). Getting the Language Right: A Health Practitioner Guide to Writing Reports,
Letters, Forms and Assessments for the NDIS. Australia.
? Tannock, R. DSM-5 changes in diagnostic criteria for Specific Learning Disabilities: What are the
implications? Retrieved 24.9.2021 fromwww.dyslexiaida.org/dsm-5-changes-in-diagnostic- criteria-for-
specific-learning-disabilities-sld1-what-are-the-implications/
? Tannock, R. DSM-5 changes in Intellectual Disability & Learning Disabilities. Retrieved 24.9.2021
from www.gov.nl.ca/education/files/k12_studentsupportservices_prolearn_pdf_pl_guid
ancepsych.pdf
o Consider how th
It is recommended case conceptualisations and draft report structures are discussed in supervision.
? Highlight
? Summarise
? Summarise
? Include any information to which the writer may wish to refer in the body or conclusion of the report.
? End with a
. If the argument is that a parent does not have the capacity to provide the care that a specific child
or young
However,
A child or young person section needs to include the following components, in an order that best allows a
reader to come away with a solid understanding of the child or young person and their needs:
?
?
?
?
For a parent or carer capacity assessment report, the parent or carer section needs to include the following
components, in an order that best presents the opinion on their capacity to provide care for a child or young
person:
At times, it may be difficult to decide where information should appear and sometimes information may occur
in two sections but with a different emphasis
Conclusions
The section should be a one to two page summary of the assessment.
Try not to repeat what has already been written in the summary sectio
It is important that newinformation is not introduced in the conclusions (for example,
if the child is within the active attachment stage, this should be identified in the child or young person section
prior to discussion of the importance of this within the conclusions).
Recommendations
Writers should ensure that the recommendations address all the referral questions.
Recommendations about future care arrangements
If a case has been referred for a recommendation regarding a child or young person future care
arrangements, it is often necessary for writers to specify what court order the department should seek in their
opinion. In some circumstances, writers may prefer not to recommend a specific order but to stipulate what
should occur for the child or young person (for example, it could be recommended that all reunification efforts
cease rather than recommending that a child or young person be placed under the long-termGuardianship of
the Chief Executive).
Recommendations about family contact
Recommendations regarding family contact arrangements should be specific and remind the reader of the
purpose of contact.
Writers should avoid specifying a service or a private provider to provide a given intervention as availability or
accessibility cannot be guaranteed.
General considerations
Recommendations should relate to the current situation or what needs to occur in the near future. Writers
should refrain from offering X then Y recommendations as it is often difficult to accurately foresee the
future and what may be appropriate actions when situations change. Readers can be directed to consult with
the writer if circumstances change and further consideration is required. Any required timeframes (for parents
to begin to demonstrate evidence of change or for reunification to occur for example) should be specifically
communicated (for example, months as opposed to the short-term
Recommendations must be realistic and achievable froma client perspective or else should be re-considered.
Writers should consider the order in which recommendations are offered. It may be important to consider the
reader understanding of the management process that is required (such as a reunification process or
a process to improve a placement capacity to meet the child or young person needs for example).
Summary
There is a template report available to assist with tabulating data fromthe cognitive and adaptive functioning
assessments in an easily digestible format for the NDIA. The interpretation section includes overt explanation
of how percentile ranks reflect peer comparisons and repetition of the category data contained in the tables.
The NDIA
conceptualise adaptive functioning as encompassing five key domains and are looking for commentary around
how the child or young person substantially impacts their functional capacity in those domains.
Consider using subtitles or bold/underline to discuss these domains of:
? mobility
? communication
? socialising
? learning
? self-care (for example, hygiene, grooming, feeding, health)
? self-management (for example, making decisions, problem solving, managing finances this criterion is
irrelevant for 0-8 year olds).
If indicated, make a statement to the effect that the child or young person will require assistance fromothers
in certain domains.
Conclusions
Recommendations
A recommendation should be made that the report to be provided to the school and carers.
Where criteria have been met for Intellectual Developmental Disorder (Intellectual Disability), a
recommendation should be made for the report to be forwarded to the NDIAso that the child or young person
can access ongoing support to develop their adaptive skills. When the assessed young person is an adolescent
and approaching transitioning fromcare, considerationmay be given to recommending post-18 years supports
and/or SACAT orders.
Variability in NDIA practice means that at times NDIS planners looks to assessment reports for guidance
regarding specific supports. If the child or young person would benefit from occupational therapy, speech
pathology and/or psychology intervention, make recommendations to this effect.
There are several reasons that a further assessment may be recommended, including:
?
Compliance with these guidelines will be monitored on a case by case basis by the DCP Psychological
Services leadership group.
Document control
Reference No./ File No.
Document Owner Lead Writer
Directorate/Unit: Quality and Practice
Accountable Director: Director Quality and Tamara Muller, Practice Leader
Practice
Commencement date 3 June 2022 Review date 3 June 2025
Risk rating Consequence Rating Likelihood Risk Rating
Risk Assessment Matrix Minor Unlikely Low
REVISION RECORD
Approval Date Version Revision description
1 January 2016 1.0 Final
Revised version replaces Clinical Guidelines For
3 June 2022 1.1 Undertaking Psychological Assessments For Families
SA Psychologists
Appendix 1