22 For Website PPRAF2015 Final

Period of Report (Dates)
Project Title:
Project Summary:
Database Number:
Implementing Entity (IE)
[name]:
Type of IE:
Country(ies):
Relevant Geographic Points
(i.e. cities, villages, bodies of
water):
Project Milestones
Milestone
AFB Approval Date:
AFB Approval Date:
IE-AFB Agreement
Signature Date:
Start of Project/Programme:
Mid-term Review Date (if
planned):
Terminal Evaluation Date:
List the Website address

(URL) of project.
Project contacts:
National Project
Manager/Coordinator
Name:
Email:
Date:
Government DA
Name:
Email:
Date:
Implementing Entity
Name:
Email:
Date:
Executing Agency
Name:
Email:
Date:
Executing Agency
Name:
Email:
Date:
Executing Agency
Name:
Email:
Date:
Project Performance Report (PPR)
01 November 2014 to 31 Octoberl 2015
Implementation of Concrete Adaptation Measures to Reduce Vulnerability of Livelihoods and Economy of Coastal Communities of Tanzania
Tanzania is impacted by climate change mainly through its effects on rainfall patterns, temperature extremes and sea level rise. The direct impacts of these changes are
droughts, the destruction of infrastructures in the coast and inland through flooding, inundation, erosion and storms; if no action is taken, the socio-economic impacts w
water availability and quality, and losses of lives and livelihoods, as well as the accelerated degradation of ecosystems that form the basis of the Tanzanian economy. T
project proposal to adapt to the climate change in the coast of Dar es salaam. In December 2011 the Adaptation Fund Board considered the proposal and approved a five
Implementation of the project started in 1 November 2012.
The project consists of the following outcomes, supported by on the ground activities implemented primarily in the vicinity of Dar Es Salaam:
1. Adverse impacts of SLR and floods on coastal infrastructures and settlements are reduced.
2. Coastal ecosystems are rehabilitated and Integrated Coastal Area Management is implemented.
3. Knowledge of climate impacts and adaptation is increased.
The project is being implemented by the United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP) and executed by the Vice Presidents Office (Division of Environment) in clo
Dar es Salaam City Council and Municipalities of Ilala, Temeke and Kinondoni.
AFB-5060-1111-2G48
UNEP
MIE
United Republic of Tanzania
Dar es Salaam City (Ocean Road; Kigamboni-Mwalimu Nyerere Memorial Institute; Kinondoni Municipality:Tandale street in Tandale ward and Kawe street in Kawe
Buguruni ward; Temeke Municipality: Miburani-Mtoni Bustani streets in Mtoni ward and Butiama street (Butiama drainage) in Kijichi ward;Sarender Bridge, Kunduch
14-Dec-11
14-Dec-11
1-Nov-12
November, 2015-January 2016 (MTR - ongoing), November 1, 2017 (Terminal - planned)

List documents/ reports/ brochures / articles that have been prepared about the project.
Inception Workshop Report 2012; Quarterly Expenditure Reports (Q4,2012, Q1, Q2, Q3&Q4, 2013; Q1,Q2,Q3,Q4, 2014, Q1, Q2&Q3, 2015); Project brief report to the
Tanzania for the Government; TORs of: Joint Project Steering Committee; National Project Coordinator; Senior Technical Adviser; Finance and Administrative Assistan
project vehicle; evaluation report for experssion of interest for a position of senior technical adviser; evaluation report for a position of consultancy services for deve
of indicators and various consultancies. Finalized TORs of: (Feasibility Study, EIA study for the proposed Construction and Rehabilitation of Seawall at Ocean Road and
Institute) and Rehabilitation of Drainage Systems; Climate Change Knowledge Management Specialist; Coastal Zone Management Specialist; Memorandum of Underst
rehabilitation of seawall of Kigamboni and Ocean Road and drainage systems; Reef specialist, Rural energy consultant, mangrove specialist,Coastal Reabilitation specia
env.engineering firm for mangrove rehabilitation, Climate Change Observatory for Tanzania, Task Force to develop EBICAM Action Planand sub-contract NGO reef reh
Interest Tender No. ME 002/2012-13/DE/C/07 for Re-advertized Consultancy services for Development of a baseline survey and development of indicators and target
Budget, Revised Work Plan, Variance of the revised project budget, Report of the development of the Terms of Reference of various consultancies. Baseline study rep
November 2013 to October 2014). PPR B (1 November 2013 to 30 April 2014, 1 November 2014 to 30 April 2015), Audit reports 2013 and 2014, Final Draft Ecosystem
(EBICAM) Action Plan for Dar es Salaam region. Brief report of UNEP task manager and senior technical adviser mission, 2013, Annual physical and financial performan
materials on on appropriate energy technologies, Criteria of efficient cookstoves, Evaluation and negotiation reports of various consultancies, Bids amount of the cons
management reporting, Inception reports of: Reef specialist, Climate change knowledge management specialist, Coastal zone management specilaist, Rural energy co
Mangrove specialist, NGO for reef rehabilitation, NGO for mangrove reahbilitation, 3rd Revised budget, Revised Work Plan, Agreement between VPO and UNOPS, Ma
Results Framework, Action Plan for years 2012,2013,2014,2015,2016&2017, Steering Committee minutes (1st,2nd and 3rd meetings), Training report, Workshop repo
of STA, Senior technical Adviser (STA) Work Plans, STA MIssion Reports (1-4); STA Quarterly Reports (2013-2014-2015); Draft Reports of EIA study, Feasibility study an
Revised budget.
http://www.unep.org/climatechange/adaptation/AccessToAdaptationFinance/AdaptationFundProjects/Tanzania
Eng. Ladislaus Kyaruzi
[email protected]
31-Oct-2015
Eng. Angelina Madete

[email protected]
31-Oct-2015
Lars Christiansen, UNEP task manager

[email protected]
31-Oct-2015
Vice President's Office

[email protected]
31-Oct-2015
Financial information: cumulative from project start to 31 October 2015
DISBURSEMENT OF AF GRANT
FUNDS
How much of the total AF grant as noted in Project Document plus any project preparation grant
has been spent to date?
Estimated cumulative total 1,324,200
disbursement as of 31st October
2015(USD)*
$1,324,200 is the amount disbursed by UNEP to VPO.
Cumulative expenditures until October 31st, 2015 (i.e.
funding spent by VPO) is $1,128,717.34
Add any comments on AF Grant
Funds. (word limit=200)
INVESTMENT INCOME
Amount of annual investment income generated from the Adaptation Fund’s grant
EXPENDITURE DATA
List ouput and corresponding
amount spent for the current ITEM / ACTIVITY / ACTION AMOUNT
reporting period
Output 1.1: Sea wall raised,
rehabilitated and constructed in
621,403.40
areas showing particular damage
Output 1.2: Effective storm and

flood drainage systems in urban
areas and near coastal
communities cleaned, 40,000.00
rehabilitated
Output 1.3: EIA and feasibility

study undertaken 48,263.15
Output 2.1: Mangrove

rehabilitated through planting of
resilient seedlings, dredging and 9,000.00
the creation of no-take buffer
zones
Output 2.2: Appropriate

alternative energy (efficient cook
stoves, small solar) technology
transferred for avoided 14,115.00
deforestation including through
training
Output 2.3: Coral reef
rehabilitated and protected in
coastal sites 9200
Output 2.4: Shoreline
rehabilitated and stabilized using
indigeneous resilient trees and -
grasses
Output 3.1: Performance of a

baseline study based on coastal 3,995.00
vulnerability
Output 3.2: Climate change
observatory for Tanzania for
ongoing monitoring of CZM and
coastal environmental status and 13,750.00
scientific research created and
operational
Output 3.3: Assessment of the

economic viability and practical
feasibility of adaptation
measures (i.e. through -
undertaking cost-benefit
analyses)
Output 3.4:District level

administration have the capacity
to adequately manage 21,026.95
rehabilitated infrastructure
Output 3.5: One EBICAM action

plan for the coastal region 40,952.19
approved
Monitoring and Evaluation 10,861.15
Project Execution 63,116.66
TOTAL 895,683.50
PLANNED EXPENDITURE
SCHEDULE
List outputs planned and Est.

corresponding projected cost for ITEM / ACTIVITY / ACTION PROJECTED COST Completion
the upcoming reporting period Date
Output 1.1: Sea wall raised,
rehabilitated and constructed in
areas showing particular damage 1,931,596.60 Jun-17
Output 1.2: Effective storm and 860,000.00

flood drainage systems in urban
areas and near coastal Jun-17
communities cleaned,
rehabilitated
Output 1.3: EIA and feasibility 21,799.08

study undertaken Jun-16
Output 2.1: Mangrove 35,860.00
rehabilitated through planting of
resilient seedlings, dredging and Jun-17
the creation of no-take buffer
zones
Output 2.2: Appropriate 50,385.00

alternative energy (efficient cook
stoves, small solar) technology
transferred for avoided Apr-16
deforestation including through
training
Output 2.3: Coral reef 25,600.00

rehabilitated and protected in May-17
coastal sites
Output 2.4: Shoreline -
rehabilitated and stabilized using
indigeneous resilient trees and Oct-17
grasses
Output 3.1: Performance of a -

baseline study based on coastal Sep-14
vulnerability
Output 3.2: Climate change 27,000.00
observatory for Tanzania for
ongoing monitoring of CZM and
coastal environmental status and Oct-17
scientific research created and
operational
Output 3.3: Assessment of the -

economic viability and practical
feasibility of adaptation
measures (i.e. through Sep-16
undertaking cost-benefit
analyses)
Output 3.4:District level 20,000.00

administration have the capacity
to adequately manage Oct-17
rehabilitated infrastructure
Output 3.5: One EBICAM action 27,050.00

plan for the coastal region Jun-17
approved
Monitoring and Evaluation 26,000.00
Oct-17
Project Execution 56,900.00 Oct-17

TOTAL 3,082,190.68
ACTUAL CO-FINANCING (If the MTR or TE have not been undertaken this reporting period,
DO NOT report on actual co-financing.)
How much of the total co-financing Co-financing is not applicable to the project
as committed in the Project
Document has actually been
realized?
Estimated cumulative actual co-

financing as verified during Mid-
term Review (MTR) or Terminal
Evaluation (TE).
Add any comments on actual co-

financing in particular any issues
related to the realization of in-kind,
grant, credits, loans, equity, non-
grant instruments and other types
of co-financing. (word limit=200)
RISK ASSESMENT
IDENTIFIED RISKS
List all Risks identified in project preparation phase and what steps are being taken to mitigate them
Identified Risk Current Status Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk
Operational: The multiple Low The appointed National Project Coordinator, Senior Technical
ongoing initiatives on climate Adviser and assistant administrative and financial manager as a
adaptation in Tanzania could dedicated team for project coordination ensure that the project
cause operational delays for this maintains its objectives. In addition the realisation of the Project
project Steering Committee (PSC) has helped to resolve pending issues
allowing a smooth progress of the planned activities. The
Chairperson of the PSC who is the Permanent Secretary of the
Vice President's Office ensures that no unnecessary delays of
this project. PSC has been able to meet in 3rd March 2014, 22nd
July 2014 and 16 February 2015. Focal points have been
appointed from the project sites that are Ilala, Temeke,
Kinondoni municipalities and Dar es salaam city council.
Political: District-level Low The Project Steering Committee was established among others,
stakeholders and administrations to provide overall guidance with regard to implementation of the
show low engagement for project activities. Its members are: Permanent Secretary– Vice
adaptation measures President’s Office (Chair); Director of Environment-Vice
President’s Office; Director of Environment- First Vice
President’s Office –Zanzibar; Director- Dar es Salaam City
Council; District Executive Director – Pangani District Council;
District Executive Director – Bagamoyo District Council;
District Executive Director – Rufiji District Council; Municipal
Executive Director – Temeke Municipal Council; Municipal
Executive Director – Ilala Municipal Council; Director of Forest
– Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism; Director of Water
Resources – Ministry of Water; Director- Ministry of Works;
UNEP Task Manager of the Project; and Assistant Director of
Environmental Assessment- Vice President’s Office (Secretary).
The Steering Committee met on 3rd March 2014, 22nd July
2014 and 16th February 2015. Also, Dar es Salaam City
Council, Ilala, Temeke and Kinondoni Municipal Councils each
appointed a focal person for this project. The trainings to the
district representatives of the coastal communities, fishermen
associations, municipal planners, forest officers and
environment of the Municipalities of Ilala, Kinondoni and
Temeke municipalities and Dar es Salaam City Council
enhanced their engagement for adaptation measures on the
coastal amd marine environment. trainings were conducted in
December 2014.
Political: the project could Low The dedicated personnel for project management been
experience difficulties in established through the Vice President‘s Office coordinates and
coordination and oversight for monitors the project outputs and activities. Close collaboration
activities delivered at various among various ministries and stakeholders is provided through
sectors, levels of governments or among others the project steering committee. With the
by multiple partners realisation of the first, second and third Project Steering
Committee meetings and appointement of the Focal Points from
the project areas, a greater cross-intitunional coordination has
been achieved.
Environmental: Extreme weather Medium The preliminary designs of the protective infrastructure
events such as tropical storms, rehabilitation have been designed according to the best available
floods or droughts could hinder technical standards and using the best available technology. The
progress in ecosystem baseline study provided appropriate data and information to be
rehabilitation and infrastructure used. In addition all foreseen ecosystem rehabilitation works
activities will be carried out in startight collaboration with NGOs and
communities who will be supporting the project in case of
extreme weathar event that could equire additional labour input.
Finally, working conditions for all key activities of ecosystem
and infrastructure rehabilitation will be such to take into
consideration and minimize the impacts of any eventual
disruption caused by extreme climate/meteorological event.
Topographical and geotechnical surveys scheduled for February
2016 before the construction starts will provide further guidance
on how to take into account extreme weather events.
Financial: market and price Low The feasibility study has established the possible costs for the
fluctuations could cause price project activities. The estimate costs shows the seawalls' budget
variations and variations in costs is within the budget but the drainage works have highest costs
of certain project activities, compared to the initial budget. Environmental Impact
leading to budgetary constraints. Assessment (EIA) has developed a risk management and
contingency plans. The baseline study was completed in
September 2014 with updated information on the current
situation. The management response to the baseline study was
endoresed by the Project steering committee on 16 February
2015 and responds to most isues on market and price
fractuations. In this case all consultancies including
rehabilitation of coral reefs and mangroves are balanced as per
the budget of the consultancies. Seawalls budget is acceptable.
Estimate costs on drainage works have lead to reducing sites
from five (5) to two (2) sites.
Critical Risks Affecting Progress (Not identified at project design)

Identify Risks with a 50% or > likelihood of affecting progress of project
Identified Risk Current Status Steps Taken to Mitigate Risk
Vice President's Office (VPO) Medium The experience from the previous period of project
"the executing entity" low implementation have shown severe delays due to slow
executions rate due to internal procurement procedures within VPO. A formal partnership with
procurement procedures. the VPO procurement unit to create streamlined and dedicated
processes for the project (e.g. on-demand meetings of the
procurement board) was established by including a specific
budget in the revised project budget to cover any unforeseen
costs during the procurement processes. Furthermore, 2013,
2014 and 2015 project activities were included in the annual
work plans of the VPO. This has somewhat improved the
procurement process by being able to procure many
consultancies at a time. Out of all 16 consultancies of the project
(14 or 87.5%) have signed contracts and started working
including UNOPS which combines three consultancies of
feasibility study, seawall &drainage systems construction and
rehabilitation. UNOPS procured ARU Company to undertake
feasibility study of seawalls. Procurement of Coastal climate
adaptation consultant and labor costs for shoreline stabilization
will be done in the first half of 2016. However, measures
implemented so far have not been sufficiently effective in
mitigating the risk. To minimize further the potential risk with
the procurement delays towards the construction/rehabilitation
of infrastructures (sea walls and drainage system; the biggest
outputs of the project), in January 2015 the MoU was signed
with the UNOPS, by which all the procurement and feasibility
studies towards the construction/rehabilitation of infrastructures
(sea walls and drainage system) will be carried out by this UN
unit. Therefore, processes such as (i) The preparation of the
feasibility studies and preliminary design requirements, (ii)
preparation of the final design requirements; (iii) preparation of
the Works design, drawings and other specifications; (iv)
preparation of the construction and procurement strategy; (v)
procurement of the Works in accordance with the procurement
strategy; (vi) undertaking and development of the Works in
accordance with the construction strategy, and; (vii)
institutional capacity development for maintenance of coastal
infrastructure have been included in the UNOPS MoU.
Risk Measures: Were there any risk mitigation measures employed during the current reporting
period? If so, were risks reduced? If not, why were these risks not reduced?
Add any comments relevant to risk mitigation (word
limit = Due
Yes. 500)to the delays in the procurement processes observed during the past period, a formal partnership
with the VPO procurement unit was established by including a specific budget in the revised project budget to
cover any unforeseen costs during the procurement processes. Although this measure has enabled the VPO
Procurement Unit to carry out several procurement processes in simultaneous, unfortunately the risks were
not fully reduced and delays persisted. One of the major causes identified was the inabiility of establishing a
fasttrack mechanism to hasten the procurement process by reducing the time required by Government Law for
public advertisement and contract. Considering that the next major procurements to follow will be related to
the construction/rehabilitation of infrastructures (sea walls and drainage systems), a decision was made to
partnership with the UNOPS through an MoU so to gurantee speedy implementation. An agreement with
UNOPS was signed on 30th January 2015. In this case and antecipating any delays a Project Steering and
Technical committees representing the GoT-VPO was suggested to be introduced and responsible for the
constant monitoring of the works to be developed under the UNOPS MoU.
RATING ON IMPLEMENTATION PROGRESS
For rating definitions please see bottom of page.
Progress on Key Milestones Expected Progress

Project Component 1 - Addressing climate change impacts on key infrastructure and settlements
Manager/Coordinator:
Rehabilitate, construct and upgrade coastal Contract an engineering firm to rehabilitate and
protection facilities to construct seawalls. Rehabilitate, construct and
protect settlements upgrade 1400 linear meters of seawall along the
economic and cultural Ocean Road and Kigamboni (Mwalimu Nyerere
infrastructure Memorial Academy-staff quarters).
Documentation of seawall rehabilitation and
construction.
Cleaning up of the drainage channels, Contract an engineering firm for

rehabilitation of storm drains Rehabilitate/Cleaning and maintenance of five storm
drains in Ilala, Temeke and Kinondoni
Municipalities.
Rehabilitate/Cleaning and maintenance of five storm
drains in Ilala, Temeke and Kinondoni
Municipalities.
Documentation of drainage systems activities
Undertake trainings on ecosystem based coastal
adaptation
EIA and feasibility study Undertake EIA and feasibility study in areas of
seawalls and drainage systems. Establish
procurement partnership
Component 2 – Ecosystem-based Integrated Coastal Area Management

Mangrove rehabilitation
Procure seedlings, saplings and materials for
mangrove rehabilitation.
Undertake trainings to promote conservation of
rehabilitated areas within mangroves.
Planting of resilient seedlings.
Appropriate alternative energy Distribute fuel efficient cookstoves to 1,500

households.
Procure rural energy consultant to prepare to prepare
trainings materials on appropriate alternative energy
technologies (efficient cookstoves, small solar).
Training district officers and community
representatives on fuel efficient technologies
Coral reef rehabilitation and protection Restore live coverage, using in situ techniques for
coral breeding and transplantation.
Undertake awareness raising to fisheries and local
government officers in order to further reduce
unsustainable fishing methods and reef uses.
Analyse on lab-agri research.
Shoreline stabilization through Replant native and resilient trees including bushes
reforestation and grasses in sufficient density, along the shore with
a particular focus on the rehabilitated infrastructures
Procure coastal climate adaptation consultant.
Shoreline stabilization labour cost.
Component 3 – Knowledge, coastal monitoring and policy linkages

Stocktaking Undertake baseline survey and development of
indicators and targets.
Develop a database of information relevant to
adaptation in Tanzania
Coastal monitoring and assessment Technical assessment of the viability and resilience
of proposed actions.
Monitoring the key determinants of vulnerability i.e.
SLR, water availability and precipitation patterns.
Create Climate Change Observatory
for Tanzania (CCOT). Organize
meetings of CCOT.
Policy linkages Document lessons learned from project outputs.

Review infrastructure
maintenance programs of Dar es Salaam City,
Temeke, Kinondoni and Ilala Municipalities.
Develop an Ecosystem-
Based Integrated Coastal Area Management Action
Plan (EBICAM). Organise an inception
workshop.
Organize policy briefing workshops.Training district
administration on budgetary allocations for
rehabilitated infrastructures.
Project operation and management
Procurement Prepare procurement plans

Procure consultancies
Procure firms for goods and works services
Procure a project vehicle and ensure its
maintenance. Purchase computers and accessories.
Monitoring and evaluation Facilitate auditing.
Perform mid-term evaluation and cost-effectiveness
assessment. Travel to sites. Undtertake steering
committee and technical committee meetings. Bank
transfer and statements.
Perform final evaluation.
Establish project management team Establish the National project management team.
Procure the Senior
Technical Advisor.
Please Provide the Name and Contact information of person(s) reponsible for completeling the Rating section
Name: Eng. Ladislaus Kyaruzi
Email: [email protected]
Please justify your rating. Outline the positive and negative progress made by the project since it started. Provide specific recommendations for next steps. . (word
limit=500)
Engagement of UNOPS to construct and seawalls and drainage systems marked the biggest achievement as a process to implement the biggest component of the project. It is
engagement of UNOPS to lead infrastructure work will improve effectiveness of delivery for infrastructure component. The appointment of the officer within UNOPS respon
project has helped ensuring the assignment is implemented. Already UNOPS has procured ARUP to undertake feasibility study of seawalls and TRES Consult (T) Limited ha
to undertake EIA study. Draft EIA and feasibility study reports are available. This is a good step. Establishment of the procurement partnership between the project and the V
unit has improved the procurement process. As a result, procurement at this moment is not be a big challenge since 87.5% of all the required consultants have signed the contr
working . TORs of all urgent consultancies have been finalized. Although already the project face some delays, the work plan has been revised to ensure the project will be c
planned.
Dedicated key personnel of the management team: The National Project Coordinator is responsible for the overall day to day management of the project; Finance and adminis
provides finance and administration support; Senior Technical Adviser provides overall technical guidance and support; and Focal persons at Dar es salaam City Council, Ilal
Kinondoni municipalities support overall implementation of the project activities in their areas. Joint Project Steering Committee of AF and LDCF projects formed with mem
President's Office, Dar es Salaam City Council and its three municipalities of Ilala, Kinondoni and Temeke, Ministry of Works, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism is
the objectives of the project are met. Trainings to officers and community representatives of Ilala, Temeke and Kinondoni municipalities and Dar es salaam city council has b
to make sure the direct people to be involved in project areas have understanding to support the implementation of the project activities.
Project work plan and procurement plan has been integrated in Vice President's Office (VPO) plans. The baseline study consultancy procurement has been finalized and the w
baseline and targets of the project finalized in September 2014. The Revision of Results Framework and Management Response have been done to respond to the comments
study. The framework and management response were endorsed by the Steering Committee in February 2015 and communicated to AFSec. The draft EBICAM Action Plan i

Component 1 - Addressing climate change impacts on key infrastructure and settlements
Implementing Agency
Rehabilitate, construct and upgrade See above.
coastal
protection facilities to
protect settlements
economic and cultural
infrastructure
Cleaning up of the drainage channels, See above.

rehabilitation of storm drains
EIA and feasibility study See above.
Component 2 – Ecosystem-based Integrated Coastal Area Management

Mangrove rehabilitation See above.
Appropriate alternative energy See above.
Coral reef rehabilitation and protection See above.
Shoreline stabilization through See above.

reforestation
Component 3 – Knowledge, coastal monitoring and policy linkages
Stocktaking See above.
Coastal monitoring and assessment See above.

Policy linkages See above.
Project operation and management
Procurement See above.
Monitoring and evaluation See above.
Establish project management team See above.
Name: Lars Christiansen, UNEP TM
Email: [email protected]
Other
Name:
Email:
Please justify your rating and

address the following points:
1. Indicate trends, both positive and
UNEP TM: While the project remains behind schedule, 2015 has seen very encouraging developmen
negative, in achievement of
greatly improve delivery in 2016. Most notable being: 1. The MoU signed with UNOPS for delivery of
outcomes as per the project
components, which although also slightly delayed for various reasons, is already showing positive resul
indicators.
be on track for major delivery in 2016 as outlined by the NPC above. A major concern is that the activit
2. Detail critical risks that have
will likely have to be revised somewhat as cost (or more correctly scope of needed interventions in eac
affected progress.
severely underestimated in the ProDoc. This in turn will necessitate a revision of the quantitative target
3. Outline response to MTR
of sites covered. 2: Procurement issues have been, if not resolved, then made irrelevant by the current co
undertaken this reporting period.
of planned procurement as mentioned above. The MTR currently ongoing will provide further recomm
4. Outline action plan to address
how to improve project delivery and impact ahead of project completion.
projects with a rating of HU, U or
MU. Please keep your input to 1200
words
Rating Definitions
Highly Satisfactory
(HS)
Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period are progressing on
exceeding expectations to acheive all major outcomes/outputs for given reportin
without major shortcomings. The project can be presented as “good practice”.
Satisfactory (S)
Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period are progressing on
achieve most of its major outcomes/outputs with only minor shortcomings.
Marginally
Satisfactory (MS) Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period are progressing on
achieve most major relevant outcomes/outputs, but with either significant shor
modest overall relevance.
Marginally
Unsatisfactory (MU) Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period are not progressin
achieve major outcomes/outputs with major shortcomings or is expected to ac
some of its major outcomes/outputs.
Unsatisfactory (U)
Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period are not progressin
achieve most of its major outcomes/outputs.
Highly Unsatisfactory
(U) Project actions/activities planned for current reporting period are not on track a
it is failing to achieve, and is not expected to achieve, any of its outcomes/outpu
N PROGRESS
m of page.
Progress to Date Rating
An agreement with UNOPS to upgrade coastal protection was MS

signed on 30th January 2015. A UNOPS Engineer conducted a
reconnaissance field mission to establish the overall projects status,
scope and key stakeholders expectations. Construction is expected
to start soon after feasibility study. Baseline study completed in
September 2014. UNOPS has submitted the preliminary sketch
designs & outline estimation BoQ. Cost estimations based on the
feasibility study have been developed. UNOPS has submitted the
preliminary sketch designs & outline estimation BoQ.
An agreement with UNOPS to upgrade coastal protection was MS

signed on 30th January 2015. Visiting sites are done accordingly.
Sites have been visted by project management team, UNOPS, EIA
consultant and the consultant of Mid term review from Baastel
company based in UK. Training on economystem based coastal
adaptation for Commuinity -level and District level training was
conducted from18-22 December 2014. UNOPS has submitted the
preliminary sketch designs & outline estimation BoQ.
TORs of EIA study developed and TRES Consult (T) Limited S

procured to undertake EIA study. The project brief for EIA study
was submitted to the National Environment Management Council
and the full EIA is being undertaken. Draft EIA and feasibility
study reports are available. TORs of feasibility study developed and
submitted to UNOPS. UNOPS procured ARU Company to
undertake feasibility study of seawalls. Partnership on procurement
process has been established with the VPO procurement unit and
its budget line set in the budget revision.
TORs of an environmental engineering firm for mangrove MS
rehabilitation developed. Training to the community representatives
and municipal officers from Ilala, Temeke and Kinondoni
municipalities and user association training on sustainable
mangrove management conducted on 18-22 December 2014. TORs
of the mangrove specialist developed. The mangrove specialist was
procured in July 2015. The inception report of mangrove specialist
has been submitted and approved in October 2015 for further
action.
TORs of rural energy consultant developed. The procurement of the S

rural energy consultant was done in January 2015. Contract was
signed on 30th January 2015. Consultant has started his
assignments. Draft trainings materials on appropriate alternative
energy technologies have been prepared; selection criteria of
efficient cooking stove have been established. 1,500 Efficient
cookstoves will be purchased in December 2015. Pilot cookstoves
of the following model/type have been purchased: Metal clad stove
(size 9,11,12 and 14 inches); double plate stand;fixed mud stove.
Community training on appropriate alternative energy was
undertaken from 18-22 December 2014. Pilot training on efficient
cookstoves will be undertaken by January 2016 and purchase of
efficient cookstoves will be done in February 2016.
TORs of reef specialist developed. The procurement of the MS

consultancy of reef specialist done in January 2015. The reef
specialist signed the contract on 30th January 2015. TORs of the
firm to rehabilitate coral reefs developed. The NGO for reef
rehabilitation activity was procured in September 2015. The
inception report for reef rehabilitation has been submitted and
approved in October 2015 for further action. Awareness to fisheries
and local government officers from Ilala, Temeke and Kinondoni
municipalities and Dar es Salaam city in order to further reduce
unsustainable fishing methods and reef uses conducted on 18-22
December 2014.
Replant native and resilient trees including bushes and grasses in U

sufficient density, along the shore with a particular focus on the
rehabilitated infrastructures will start in June 2016.
TORs of the consultancy to undertake baseline study developed. MS
Procurement of the firm or individual to
undertake baseline study has been done (C4 EcoSolutions). The
work of baseline study was completed in September 2014.
Subsequent to the baseline study consultancy and as a result of the
findings produced a revision of the log-frame was carried out to
incorporate and/or adjust new indicators and targets.The Results
Framework and management response were endorsed by the Project
Steering Committee on 16th Feberuary 2015 and shared with the
AF Sec. Development of the database of relevant information of the
project is being undetaken by through various consultancies and the
project team.
Members of CCOT established and its TORs developed. The MU

project will support the first meeting of CCOT scheduled by
February 2016. TOR's of the coastal rehabilitation specialist
developed. Procurement of the coastal rehabilitation specialist to
advise on the establishment of CCOT and undertake technical
assessment of the viability and resilience of the proposed project
actions was done in July 2015. The consultant has submitted the
inception report that was approved in October 2015 for further
action.
Inception workshop was held 29-30 October 2012. TORs of climate MS
change knowledge management specialist developed. Procurement
of climate change knowledge management specialist done.
Contract was signed on 30th January 2015.TORs of the task force
to develop EBICAM Action Plan of Dar es Salaam region
developed. Task force to develop EBICAM formed. The draft
EBICAM Action Plan of Dar es Salaam region developed.
Consultative stakeholders workshop to validate the draft EBICAM
Action Plan was held 23-24 April 2015. The draft EBICAM action
Plan will be expanded to cover all coastal regions of Tanzania (Dar
es Salaam, Lindi, Mtwara, Tanga and Coast).
Partnership on procurement process done with the VPO S

procurement unit, Senior Technical Adviser recruited. Procurement
Plan for 2013,2014 and 2015 prepared. Office supplies, computers
and assoceries procured. Project
car procured (Toyota Hilux Double Cabin registered as DFPA240).
C4 EcoSolutions procured to
update/develop indicators and targets.
Procurement of Reef specialist, Coastal zone management
specialist, Rural consultant and Climate change knowledge
management specialsit was done in January 2015. Procurement of
coastal rehabilitation specialist and mangrove specialist done in July
2015. Sub-Contract NGO Reef Rehabilitation and Sub-Contract
Environmental Engineering Firm for Mangrove Including Creation
of Buffer Zones done in September 2015.
Purchase of 1,500 cookstoves to be done by April 2016. UNOPS
engaged for scoping and designs of the seawall and drainage
systems and will be engaged for constrcution works.
2013 and 2014 Audits done by the Government Audt and Control MU
General. Mid term review started in October 2015 by Baastel
company based in UK that was recruited by UNEP. The Project
Steering Committee (PSC) formed and carried out the first, second
and third meetings (3rd March 2014, 22nd July 2014 and 16th
Feberuary 2015). The Project Technical Committee established in
December 2013.
The National Project Coordinator appointed. S

The project finance and administration appointed. The
International Senior Technical Adviser recruited in 2013.
Overall Rating MS
completeling the Rating section

aus Kyaruzi
@gmail.com
Provide specific recommendations for next steps. . (word
evement as a process to implement the biggest component of the project. It is expected the
rastructure component. The appointment of the officer within UNOPS responsible for the
P to undertake feasibility study of seawalls and TRES Consult (T) Limited has been procured
Establishment of the procurement partnership between the project and the VPO procurement
big challenge since 87.5% of all the required consultants have signed the contracts and start
ce some delays, the work plan has been revised to ensure the project will be completed as
ble for the overall day to day management of the project; Finance and administration assistant
l guidance and support; and Focal persons at Dar es salaam City Council, Ilala, Temeke and
oint Project Steering Committee of AF and LDCF projects formed with members from Vice
nd Temeke, Ministry of Works, Ministry of Natural Resources and Tourism is active to ensure
, Temeke and Kinondoni municipalities and Dar es salaam city council has been undertaken
mplementation of the project activities.
ans. The baseline study consultancy procurement has been finalized and the work to establish
work and Management Response have been done to respond to the comments of the baseline
ebruary 2015 and communicated to AFSec. The draft EBICAM Action Plan is available.

See above.
MS
See above.
U
See above.
See above.
MS
See above.
See above.
MS
See above.
MS
See above. MS
See above. MS
See above. MS
See above. S
See above.
See above. S
Overall Rating MS
sen, UNEP TM
@dtu.dk

Overall Rating
s behind schedule, 2015 has seen very encouraging developments that will
notable being: 1. The MoU signed with UNOPS for delivery of infrastructure
y delayed for various reasons, is already showing positive results and should
s outlined by the NPC above. A major concern is that the activity on drainage
t as cost (or more correctly scope of needed interventions in each site) were
This in turn will necessitate a revision of the quantitative target and number
ave been, if not resolved, then made irrelevant by the current completion rate
bove. The MTR currently ongoing will provide further recommendations on
oject delivery and impact ahead of project completion.
ctivities planned for current reporting period are progressing on track or

ations to acheive all major outcomes/outputs for given reporting period,
ortcomings. The project can be presented as “good practice”.
ctivities planned for current reporting period are progressing on track to

ts major outcomes/outputs with only minor shortcomings.
ctivities planned for current reporting period are progressing on track to

ajor relevant outcomes/outputs, but with either significant shortcomings or
levance.
ctivities planned for current reporting period are not progressing on track to
utcomes/outputs with major shortcomings or is expected to achieve only
outcomes/outputs.
ctivities planned for current reporting period are not progressing on track to
ts major outcomes/outputs.
ctivities planned for current reporting period are not on track and shows that
hieve, and is not expected to achieve, any of its outcomes/outputs.
PROJECT Indicators
Please provide all indicators being tracked for the project as outlined in the project document
Type of Indicator (indicators

towards Objectives,
Outcomes, etc…)
Type of
Indicator Baseline Progress since inception
Indicator
Component 1 - Addressing climate change impacts on key infrastructure and settlements
Length of sea walls raised and Dar es salaam seawall An agreement with UNOPS to upgrade coastal
rehabilitated (2.6km) showing signs protection was signed on 30th January 2015. A
(m) of severe degradation at UNOPS Engineer conducted a reconnaissance field
Ocean Road and mission to establish the overall projects status, scope
Kingomboni and key stakeholders expectations. Construction is
expected to start soon after feasibility study. Baseline
Quantitative study completed in September 2014. UNOPS has
submitted the preliminary sketch designs & outline
estimation BoQ. Cost estimations based on the
feasibility study have been developed. UNOPS has
submitted the preliminary sketch designs & outline
estimation BoQ.
Length of drainage channels A total length of 6650m An agreement with UNOPS to upgrade coastal
contructed, rehabilitated and showing severe protection was signed on 30th January 2015. A draft
upgraded (m) degradation. This is a feasibility study and cost estimates were delivered in
total length of four sites December 2015, and UNOPS, VPO and UNEP are
of Butiama: 1650m, currently in discussion on how to adapt the scope of
Quantitative Kawe: 2650m, Bungoni: works to the available budget (see above). Training
1050m and Mtoni: on economystem based coastal adaptation for
1300m. Commuinity -level and District level training was
conducted from18-22 December 2014.
Component 2 - Ecosystem-Based Integrated Coastal Area Management (EBICAM)

Number of households receiving: i) Average wood fuel TORs of rural energy consultant developed. The
efficient cookstoves; and ii) consumption per capita procurement of the rural energy consultant was done
training on optimal use and in Tanzania is 1 to in January 2015. Contract was signed on 30th January
maintenance of these stoves 1.3m3; fuelwood 2015. Draft trainings materials on appropriate
(disaggregated by age and gender). efficiency is estimated at alternative energy technologies have been prepared;
less than 10% on selection criteria of efficient cooking stove have been
average in all sites; established. 1,500 Efficient cookstoves will be
Quantitative estimated mangrove purchased in February 2016. Pilot cookstoves of the
deforestation rate is 2% following model/type have been purchased: Metal
per year clad stove (size 9,11,12 and 14 inches); double plate
stand;fixed mud stove. Community training on
appropriate alternative energy was undertaken from
18-22 December 2014. Pilot training on efficient
cookstoves will be undertaken by January 2016.
Area of there are TORs of an environmental engineering firm for

mangroves approximately mangrove rehabilitation developed. The inception
under 2,000 ha of report has been submitted and approved in October
rehabilitation mangroves in Dar 2015 for further action. Training to the community
es Salaam representatives and municipal officers from Ilala,
surroundings Temeke and Kinondoni municipalities and user
association training on sustainable mangrove
Quantitative management conducted on 18-22 December 2014.
TORs of the mangrove specialist developed. The
mangrove specialist was procured in July 2015. The
inception report of mangrove specialist has been
submitted and approved in October 2015 for further
action. List of species established.
Area of reef rehabilitated No recent local data TORs of coastal zone management specialist
available. Latest data developed. TORs of reef specialist developed. TORs
sets show low biocover of NGO for reef rehabilitation developed. The
in existing reefs procurement of the consultancies of reef specialist,
coastal zone management specialist done. Contracts
were signed on 30th January 2015. Both consultants
have submitted the inception reports. Awareness
raising to fisheries and local government officers
from Dar es salaam city council, Ilala, Temeke and
Kinondoni municipal councils was undertake from
Quantitative 18-22 December 2014. The NGO to undertake
rehabilitation of coral reefs was procured in
September 2015. The NGO has submitted the
inception report on how the rehabilitation will be
done. The report was approved in october 2015. List
of species established.
Km of shoreline rate of coastal Replant native and resilient trees including bushes and
stabilized using erosion estimated grasses in sufficient density, along the shore with a particular
vegetation between 3 and focus on the rehabilitated infrastructures will start in June
2016. Procure coastal climate adaptation consultant will be
8m per year
Quantitative according to
done by April 2016.
recent site
specific surveys
Component 3 - Knowledge, coastal monitoring and policy linkages

Availability of a comprehensive No baseline data TORs of the consultancy to undertake baseline study
baseline study for coastal developed and C4 EcoSolutions from South Africa was
vulnerability; available knowledge procured to undertake baseline study. The baseline study
was completed in September 2014. Management response
gathered
to the recommendations of the study has been prepared and
the updated results framework has been prepared and shared
Quantitative with the AF Secretariat after the endorsement of the Project
Steering Committee on 16th February 2015.
Effective implementation of No baseline data Members of CCOT established and its TORs developed. The
clearing house function project will support the first meeting of CCOT scheduled by
February 2016. TOR's of the coastal rehabilitation specialist
developed. Procurement of the coastal rehabilitation
specialist to advise on the establishment of CCOT was done
Qualitative in July 2015. The consultant has submitted the inception
report that was approved in October 2015 for further action.
Cost-effective measures are No baseline data Coastal rehabilitation specialist procured in July 2015 to
identified for upscaling and policy identify cost effective measures. The consultant submitted
uptake the inception report that was approved in October 2015. The
Qualitative climate change knowledge management speciaist was
procured to work with the coastal rehabilitation specialist.
number of policy briefs provided to No baseline data Inception workshop held from 29-30 November
key sectors and regulators; number 0 workshops 2012.Project brief provided to stakeholders. The
of workshops stakeholders consultative workshop on development of
EBICAM Action Plan of Dar es Salaam Region was held
from 23-24 April 2015.Policy briefs prepared on: on
Quantitative appropriate alternative energy technologies (efficient
cookstoves, small solar and other efficient systems found
appropriate.
Number of reports developed 0 Trainings to district budget and planning officers on district
through the AF project on required financing and budgeting including how to manage
district budget allocations to rehabilitated infrastructures and integrating adaptation
concerns in local planning held from 18-22 December 2014
maintain infrastructure for
to local government officers from Dar es salaam city
adaptation to climate change. council, Ilala, Temeke and Kinondoni municipal councils.
The coastal rehabilitation specialist was procured to review
Quantitative infrastructure maintenance programs of Ilala, Temeke and
Kinondoni where the project activities are being
implemented. The report will be available by December
2016.
Number of plans approved no plans yet available TORs of the task force to develop EBICAM Action Plan of
but ICZM capacity exists Dar es Salaam region developed. The team of the task force
was established and developed the plan. The draft of
EBICAM Action Plan of Dar es Salaam region developed.
The stakeholders validated the draft during the EBICAM
Quantitative workshop in April 2015. The draft EBICAM action Plan will
be expanded to cover all coastal regions of Tanzania (Dar es
Salaam, Lindi, Mtwara, Tanga and Coast).
ect document
Target for Project End
ts
1400 linear meters of seawall rehabilitated
along Ocean Road and Kingamboni
By project end-point, at least 2300m of

drainage channels cleaned and rehabilitetd
By project end-point, at least 1,500

households from Ilala, Kinondoni and
Temeke Municipal Councils
40 ha of mangrove rehabilitated in one or

more of the following areas: Salender
Bridge, Kunduchi, Mbweni and Ununio.
65% survivorship of mangrove species.
2000 m2 under rehabilitation. 1300m2
(65%) survivorship of coral reefs.
At least 56,430 m2 of coastal vegetation

rehabilitated using three or more fast-
growing plant species. 65% survivorship of
shoreline vegetation species.
1 baseline study in year 1
clearing house function is operational by

mid-term
At least 1 report.
Annually, 2 policy briefs (1 on measures to

adapt to climate change, 1 on general
lessons learned).2 workshops (1 on cost-
effective measures to adapt to climate
change, 1 on general lessons learned).
1 report.
One EBICAM Action plan of Region

approved by end of project.
QUALITATIVE MEASURES and LESSONS LEARNED
Please complete the following section every reporting period

Implementation and Adaptive Management Response
What implementation issues/lessons, either positive The dedicated management team including Project Steering
or negative, affected progress? Committee (PSC), National Project Coordinator, Senior
Technical Adviser and assistant administrative and financial
manager for project coordination has asured that the project
maintains its objectives. The Permanent Secretary of the Vice
President's Office as the Chairperson of the PSC has made it
possible to reduce unnecessary delays of this project and to
take necessary measures. A formal partnership with the VPO
procurement unit to create streamlined and dedicated
processes for the project (e.g. on-demand meetings of the
procurement board) has now been established by including a
specific budget in the revised project budget to cover any
unforeseen costs during the procurement processes.
Furthermore, 2013, 2014 and 2015 project activities were/are
included in the annual work plans of the VPO. 2016 activities
have been submitted to the authority to be included to VPO
plans. This has somewhat improved the procurement process
by being able to procure many consultancies at a time. To
minimize further the potential risk with the procurement
delays towards the construction/rehabilitation of
infrastructures (sea walls and drainage system; the biggest
outputs of the project) UNOPS is engaged by which all the
procurement and feasibility studies towards the
construction/rehabilitation of infrastructures (sea walls and
drainage system) will be carried out by this UN unit.
Were there any delays in implementation? If so, Delay of the baseline study that was expected to be completed
include any causes of delays. What measures have in the first year of the project has caused delays in the
been taken to reduce delays? implementation of the project. The baseline study was
completed in September 2014. EIA and feasibility studies
could not be undertaken in 2014. As a measure, the firm to
undertake EIA study has been contracted and UNOPS
contracted to work on seawall and drainage rehabilitation and
construction and feasibility study. Delays in procurement of
consultancies delayed the implementation of the project. As a
meausre all necessary consultancies were launched at the
same time where currently about 88% of all required
consultants have signed contracts. Change of paying system
of UNEP to Umoja system caused a bit delay of activities for
the period of July-December 2015 since the project lacked
funds within this period. The lesson is that it might be of help
to request enough funds throughout the year based on the
annual work plan.
Describe any changes undertaken to improve results 145 meters of seawall to be upgraded along Kigamboni
on the ground or any changes made to project seawall, 221 meters of seawall to be constructed in
outputs (i.e. changes to project design) Kigamboni, 800 meters of seawall to be upgraded along
Ocean Road and 500 meters to be constructed along Ocean
Road.
Five sites of drainage channels to be cleaned and
rehabilitated. Originally a 50% reduction in the number of
flooding events during rainy season in targeted sites was
considered as target; 1,500 efficient cookstoves will be
provided to 1,500 households. This means each household
will get one cookstove. Originally on shoreline stabilization,
1500m (20m wide) was a target but now by project end-point,
at least 56,430 m2 of coastal vegetation rehabilitated using
three or more fastgrowing plant species. The survivorship of
species will be 65% survivorship of
mangrove species, 65% survivorship of shoreline vegetation
species and survivorship of coral reefs will be determined in
area. One plan approved by end of project was expected but
now its clear is One EBICAM Action plan of Dar es Salaam
Region approved by end of project.The full revised results
framework was shared with AFsec in February 2015.
How have gender considerations been taken into Within the national team, a finance and administration
consideration during the reporting period? What assistant is a woman which is equal to 50%. In the national
have been the lessons learned as a consequence of inception workshop, approximately 32% of the participants
inclusion of such considerations on project were women. 40% participants of the EBICAM validation
performance or impacts? workshop were women. Trainings of the project have brough
so far 37% of the participants and out of five facilitators, one
(20%) was a woman. Efficient cookstove will be provided to
1500 households through a woman of each household.
Lessons and measures related to coordination with

the LDCF project 'Developing core capacity to
address adaptation to climate change in Tanzania in
productive coastal zones'
The LDCF and AF projects are very closely coordinated, and in
practice implemented almost as one. A joint project coordination
team has been established at VPO, with one project coordinator
handling the AF project and one handling the LDCF project. The
two are reporting to, and coordinated through, the assistant director
of environment assessment Mr Richard Muyungi. In practice the
three are working very closely on a daily basis – i.e. sitting in the
same office, having joint meetings etc. Additional examples of the
close coordination and collaboration taking place between the two
projects include: Joint project steering committee with joint
meetings, joint technical committee, joint baseline study, a shared
Senior TechnicalAdviser etc, joint baseline study, joint geotechnical
and topographical surveys of seawalls works of both projects.
UNOPS has been engaged to work on behalf of Vice President's
Office on major activities of LDCF and AF projects such as
seawalls, drainage systems and groynes. All of this reduces costs,
and assures that relevant lessons, outputs and expertise are
consistently shared between the two projects. All joint activities and
financial contributions are proportionately shared and kept
completely separate to avoid co-mingling.
Please complete the following section at mid-term and project completion
Lessons for Adaptation Response
Climate Resilience Measures
What have been the lessons learned, both positive
and negative, in implementing climate adaptation
measures that would be relevant to the design and
implementation of future projects/programmes for
enhanced resilience to climate change?
The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that
can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017
What is the potential for the climate resilience
measures undertaken by the project/programme to
be replicated and scaled up both within and outside The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that
the project area? can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017
Concrete Adaptation Interventions
What have been the lessons learned, both positive
and negative, in implementing concrete adaptation
interventions that would be relevant to the design
and implementation of future projects/programmes
implementing concrete adaptation interventions? The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that
What is the potential for the concrete adaptation
interventions undertaken by the project/programme
to be replicated and scaled up both within and
outside the project area? The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that
Community/National Impact
What would you consider to be the most successful
aspects for the target communities? The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that
What measures are/have been put in place to ensure
sustainability of the project/program results? The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that
What measures are being/could have been put in
place to improve project/program results? The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that
Knowledge Management
How has existing information/data/knowledge been
used to inform project development and
implementation? What kinds of
information/data/knowledge were used? The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that
If learning objectives have been established, have
they been met? Please describe. The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that
Describe any difficulties there have been in
accessing or retrieving existing information (data or
knowledge) that is relevant to the project. Please
provide suggestions for improving access to the
relevant data. The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that
Has the identification of learning objectives
contributed to the outcomes of the project? In what The MTR is currently in draft and will provide insights that
ways have they contributed? can be shared in the next PPR submitted January 2017
Results Tracker for Adaptation Fund (AF) Projects
Goal: Assist developing-country Parties to the Kyoto Protocol that are particularly vulnerable to the adverse effects of climate change in meeting the costs of concrete adaptation projects and programmes in order to implement
climate-resilient measures.
Impact: Increased resiliency at the community, national, and regional levels to climate variability and change.
Important: Please read the following guidance document (also posted on the Adaptation Fund website) before entering your data
Link: http://www.adaptation-fund.org/sites/default/files/Results%20Framework%20and%20Baseline%20Guidance%20final.pdf
Adaptation Fund Strategic Results Framework
Project ID AFB-5060-1111-2G48
Implementing Entity UNEP
Type of implementing entity MIE
Country Tanzania
Region Africa
Sector Coastal management
Baseline information Target performance at completion Performance at mid-term Performance at completion
Direct beneficiaries supported by the Indirect beneficiaries supported by Direct beneficiaries supported by the Indirect beneficiaries supported by the Direct beneficiaries supported by Indirect beneficiaries supported by Direct beneficiaries supported by Indirect beneficiaries supported
Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries) Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries) Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries) Total (direct + indirect beneficiaries)
project the project project project the project the project the project by the project
Impact: Increased resiliency at the Total 1,835,050.00 440,050.00 1,395,000.00 Total 1,835,050.00 440,050.00 1,395,000.00 Total Total
community, national, and
Core Indicator: No. of beneficiaries
regional levels to climate
variability and change
% of female beneficiaries 51.28% 51.28% 51.28% % of female beneficiaries 50.00% 50.00% 50.00% % of female beneficiaries % of female beneficiaries
% of Youth beneficiaries 33.00% 33.00% 33.00% % of Youth beneficiaries 33.00% 33.00% 33.00% % of Youth beneficiaries % of Youth beneficiaries
Hazards information generated and Hazards information generated and Hazards information generated and Hazards information generated
Number of targeted stakeholders Overall effectiveness Number of targeted stakeholders Overall effectiveness Number of targeted stakeholders Overall effectiveness Number of targeted stakeholders Overall effectiveness
disseminated disseminated disseminated and disseminated
Outcome 1: Reduced exposure to Indicator 1: Relevant threat and hazard information

climate-related hazards and generated and disseminated to stakeholders on a timely Total Total Total Total
threats basis 1,835,050.00 1,835,050.00
% of female targeted 50.00% % of female targeted 50.00% % of female targeted % of female targeted
Coastal flooding 4: Effective Coastal flooding 4: Effective
No. of projects/programmes that conduct No. of projects/programmes that conduct No. of projects/programmes that conduct
No. of projects/programmes that conduct and
Sector Scale Status and update risk and vulnerability Sector Scale Status and update risk and vulnerability Sector Scale Status and update risk and vulnerability Sector Scale Status
update risk and vulnerability assessments
Output 1.1 Risk and vulnerability assessments assessments assessments
Indicator 1.1: No. of projects/programmes that conduct and
assessments conducted and
update risk and vulnerability assessments
updated 5 Multi-sector National 3: Risk and vulnterability assessments completed or updated Coastal management National 3: Risk and vulnterability assessments completed or updated 5 Multi-sector National
3: Risk and vulnterability assessments
completed or updated
No. of adopted Early Warning Systems Category targeted Hazard No. of adopted Early Warning Systems Category targeted Hazard No. of adopted Early Warning Systems Category targeted Hazard No. of adopted Early Warning Systems Category targeted Hazard
Geographical coverage Geographical coverage Geographical coverage Geographical coverage

0 0 0
Number of municipalities Number of municipalities Number of municipalities Number of municipalities
Output 1.2 Targeted population Number of municipalities Number of municipalities Number of municipalities Number of municipalities
groups covered by adequate risk Core Indicator 1.2: No. of Early Warning Systems
reduction systems No. of adopted Early Warning Systems Category targeted Hazard No. of adopted Early Warning Systems Category targeted Hazard No. of adopted Early Warning Systems Category targeted Hazard No. of adopted Early Warning Systems Category targeted Hazard
Number of staff targeted Sector Capacity level Number of staff targeted Sector Capacity level Number of staff targeted Sector Capacity level Number of staff targeted Sector Capacity level
Outcome 2: Strengthened
institutional capacity to reduce Indicator 2: Capacity of staff to respond to, and mitigate Total Total Total Total
risks associated with climate- impacts of, climate-related events from targeted institutions
induced socioeconomic and increased 529 60 57
environmental losses
% of female targeted 42.53% % of female targeted 50.00% % of female targeted 37.00% % of female targeted
Coastal management 2: Low capacity Coastal management 2: Low capacity Coastal management 3: Medium capacity
Total staff trained % of female staff trained Type Total staff trained % of female staff trained Type Total staff trained % of female staff trained Type Total staff trained % of female staff trained Type
Indicator 2.1.1: No. of staff trained to respond to, and
Output 2.1 Strengthened capacity mitigate impacts of, climate-related events
of national and sub-national 0 0.00% Public 60 50.00% Public 57 37.00% Public
centres and networks to respond
rapidly to extreme weather Type Scale Sector Capacity level Type Scale Sector Capacity level Type Scale Sector Capacity level Type Scale Sector Capacity level
events Indicator 2.1.2: No. of targeted institutions with increased
capacity to minimize exposure to climate variability risks
Local Coastal management 2: Low capacity Local Coastal management 2: Low capacity Local Coastal management 3: Medium capacity
Public Public Public
Outcome 3: Strengthened Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures Sector Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures Sector Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures Sector Percentage of targeted population applying adaptation measures Sector
awareness and owernship of Indicator 3.1: Increase in application of appropriate
adaptation and climate risk adaptation responses
reduction processes 20.00% Coastal management 50% Coastal management
Output 3: Targeted population No. of targeted beneficiaries % of female participants targeted Level of awareness No. of targeted beneficiaries % of female participants targeted Level of awareness No. of targeted beneficiaries % of female participants targeted Level of awareness No. of targeted beneficiaries % of female participants targeted Level of awareness
Indicator 3.1.1: Percentage in targeted population awareness
groups participating in adaptation
of predicted adverse impacts of climate change, and of
and risk reduction awareness
appropriate responses
activities
1,835,050.00 51.28% 3: Partially aware 1,835,050.00 51.28% 3: Partially aware
Baseline information Target performance at completion Target performance at completion Target performance at completion
Project/programme sector Geographical scale Response level Project/programme sector Geographical scale Response level Project/programme sector Geographical scale Response level Project/programme sector Geographical scale Response level
Indicator 4.1: Increased responsiveness of development
sector services to evolving needs from changing and variable
climate
Coastal management Local Coastal management Local
2: Partially responsive (Lacks most elements) 4: Mostly responsive (Most defined elements)
Sector Targeted asset Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative) Sector Targeted asset Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative) Sector Targeted asset Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative) Sector Targeted asset Changes in asset (quantitative or qualitative)
2: Physical asset 2: Physical asset

Outcome 4: Increased adaptive 2: Physical asset
Coastal management 1: Not improved Coastal management (produced/improved/strenghte 4: Mostly Improved Coastal management (produced/improved/strenghte 1: Not improved
capacity within relevant (produced/improved/strenghtened)
ned) ned)
development sector services and 2: Physical asset 2: Physical asset
2: Physical asset
infrastructure assets Urban development 1: Not improved Urban development (produced/improved/strenghte 4: Mostly Improved Urban development (produced/improved/strenghte 1: Not improved
(produced/improved/strenghtened)
ned) ned)
Core Indicator 4.2: Assets produced, developed, improved or
strengthened
Outcome 4: Increased adaptive
capacity within relevant
development sector services and
infrastructure assets
Core Indicator 4.2: Assets produced, developed, improved or
strengthened
Number of services Type Sector Number of services Type Sector Number of services Type Sector Number of services Type Sector
5 Multi-community Coastal management 5 Multi-community Coastal management
1 Multi-community Disaster risk reduction 1 Multi-community Disaster risk reduction

Output 4: Vulnerable
development sector services and
Indicator 4.1.1: No. and type of development sector services
infrastructure assets
to respond to new conditions resulting from climate 3 Multi-community Disaster risk reduction 3 Multi-community Disaster risk reduction
strengthened in response to
variability and change
climate change impacts, including
variability
Baseline information Baseline information Baseline information Baseline information
Outcome 5: Increased ecosystem Natural resource improvement level Sector Type Natural resource improvement level Sector Type Natural resource improvement level Sector Type Natural resource improvement level Sector Type
Indicator 5: Ecosystem services and natural resource assets
resilience in response to climate
maintained or improved under climate change and
change and variability-induced
variability-induced stress 3: Moderately effective Coastal management biological assets
stress
Total number of natural assets or ecosystems Effectiveness of Total number of natural assets or Total number of natural assets or Effectiveness of Total number of natural assets or Effectiveness of
Natural asset or Ecosystem (type) Unit Natural asset or Ecosystem (type) Unit Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation Natural asset or Ecosystem (type) Unit Natural asset or Ecosystem (type) Unit
protected/rehabilitated protection/rehabilitation ecosystems protected/rehabilitated ecosystems protected/rehabilitated protection/rehabilitation ecosystems protected/rehabilitated protection/rehabilitation
Lars Christiansen:
why can't we provide zero as the baseline here??
Mangroves 4 ha rehabilitated 2: Partially effective Mangroves 40 ha rehabilitated 4: Effective Mangroves 1 ha rehabilitated 2: Partially effective
Lars Christiansen: protected/rehabilitated protection/rehabilitation ecosystems protected/rehabilitated ecosystems protected/rehabilitated protection/rehabilitation ecosystems protected/rehabilitated protection/rehabilitation
Corals are not an option so
have left out
Output 5: Vulnerable ecosystem Other 1 ha rehabilitated 2: Partially effective Other 1 ha rehabilitated 4: Effective
services and natural resource
assets strengthned in response to Core Indicator 5.1: Natural Assets protected or rehabilitated
variability Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)
protected/rehabilitated
Unit
Lars Christiansen: protection/rehabilitation
Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)
ecosystems protected/rehabilitated
Unit
Lars Christiansen: Effectiveness of protection/rehabilitation Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)
Unit
protection/rehabilitation
Natural asset or Ecosystem (type)
Unit
protection/rehabilitation
see above why can't this be Cannot provide 1.5, which is the
0? accurate target for shoreline
rehabilitation. Very hard to use
Coasts 1 km rehabilitated 2: Partially effective Coasts this template with so many 4: Effective Coasts 1 2: Partially effective
restrictions on format!
protected/rehabilitated protection/rehabilitation ecosystems protected/rehabilitated ecosystems protected/rehabilitated protection/rehabilitation ecosystems protected/rehabilitated protection/rehabilitation
Baseline information Targeted performance at completion Performance at mid-term Performance at completion
No. of targeted households % of female headed households Improvement level No. of targeted households % of female headed households Improvement level No. of targeted households % of female headed households Improvement level No. of targeted households % of female headed households Improvement level
Indicator 6.1: Increase in households and communities
having more secure access to livelihood assets
% increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis
No. of targeted households % of female headed households Alternate Source No. of targeted households % of female headed households Alternate Source No. of targeted households % of female headed households Alternate Source No. of targeted households % of female headed households Alternate Source
baseline baseline baseline baseline
Outcome 6: Diversified and % increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis
strengthened livelihoods and No. of targeted households % of female headed households Alternate Source No. of targeted households % of female headed households Alternate Source No. of targeted households % of female headed households Alternate Source No. of targeted households % of female headed households Alternate Source
sources of income for vulnerable
people in targeted areas
Indicator 6.2: Increase in targeted population's sustained
climate-resilient alternative livelihoods % increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis
% increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis % increase in income level vis-à-vis
Indicator 6.1.1: No. and type of adaptation assets created or Number of Assets Type of Assets Sector Adaptation strategy Number of Assets Type of Assets Sector Adaptation strategy Number of Assets Type of Assets Sector Adaptation strategy Number of Assets Type of Assets Sector Adaptation strategy
strengthened in support of individual or community
livelihood strategies
Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the
Income source Income level (USD) Income source Income level (USD) Income source Income level (USD) Income source Income source
project area) project area) project area) project area)
Output 6 Targeted individual and 0 0 0

community livelihood strategies Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the
strengthened in relation to project area)
Income source Income level (USD)
project area)
project area)
project area)
Income source Income source
variability Core Indicator 6.1.2: Increased income, or avoided decrease
in income Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the
Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the Number of households (total number in the

Integration level Integration level Integration level Integration level
Outcome 7: Improved policies
Indicator 7: Climate change priorities are integrated into
and regulations that promote and
national development strategy 3: Some
enforce resilience measures
Sector Scale Type Sector Scale Type Sector Scale Type Sector Scale Type
Indicator 7.1: No. of policies introduced or adjusted to No. of Policies introduced or adjusted No. of Policies introduced or adjusted No. of Policies introduced or adjusted No. of Policies introduced or adjusted
address climate change risks
5 Multi-sector National Environmental policy
Output 7:Improved integration of
climate-resilience strategies into
country development plans No. of Development strategies Regulation Effectiveness No. of Development strategies Regulation Effectiveness No. of Development strategies Regulation Effectiveness No. of Development strategies Regulation Effectiveness
Indicator 7.2: No. of targeted development strategies with
incorporated climate change priorities enforced
4 3: Partially enforced (Some elements implemented) 3: Moderately effective 2 4: Enforced (Most elements implemented) 4: Effective
D92: Lars Christiansen:
Corals are not an option so have left out
E89: Lars Christiansen:

why can't we provide zero as the baseline here??
E95: Lars Christiansen:

see above why can't this be 0?
I95: Lars Christiansen:

Cannot provide 1.5, which is the accurate target for shoreline rehabilitation. Very hard to use this template with so many restrictions on format!
Fund Outcome Indicator Units
1. Generation of relevant data, Stakeholders, and Timeliness
2.1. Include both qualitative and quantitative measures of capacity level within targeted institutions
2.2. Number (men and women and other vulnerable groups)
3.1. Use scale from 1 to 5: 5: Fully aware 4: Mostly aware 3: Partially aware 2: Partially not aware 1: Aware of neither predicted adverse
impacts of climate change nor of appropriate responses
3.2. Use scale from 1 to 5: 5: All 4: Almost all 3: Half 2: Some 1: None
4.1. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5): 5: Highly responsive (All defined elements ) 4: Mostly responsive (Most defined elements) 3:
Moderately responsive (Some defined elements) 2: Partially responsive (Lacks most elements) 1: Non responsive (Lacks all elements )
4.2.
Summarize in an overall scale (1-5): 5: Fully improved 4: Mostly Improved 3: Moderately improved 2: Somewhat improved
1: Not improved
5. Depends on the targeted natural asset:
Biological (species): measure through changes in population numbers (dynamics, structure, etc.)
Land: measure changes in hectares. Baseline data will be necessary to estimate the change. Supporting indicators baseline and target
(as well as contextual information) are needed such as the following: Farmers adopting recommended technologies, Ha. of land
improved, Average deforestation rate Etc.
Use scale from 1 to 5. 5: Very effective (All elements are present) 4: Effective (Most elements are present) 3: Moderately effective
(Some elements are present) 2: Partially effective (Most elements are not present) 1: Ineffective (No elements are present)
6.1. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5): 5: Very high improvement 4: High improvement 3: Moderate improvement 2: Limited
improvement 1: No improvement
6.2. Household income by source of livelihood in project area (USD) prior and post
project intervention
7. Summarize in an overall scale (1-5). 5: All (Fully integrated) 4: Most 3: Some 2: Most not integrated
1: None
Fund Output Indicator Units

1.1. Number, sector(s) and level(s) of projects or interventions in separate fields of monitoring plan
1.2. Number
2.1.1. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted
institutions b. Define target
2.1.2. Number of staff (male/female) of targeted institutions: a. Obtain baseline information: total number of staff from targeted
institutions b. Define target: needs to be defined by project proponents
2.2.1. Quantitative: Percentage (includes women – and other vulnerable groups – and men).
Qualitative: Adequacy: include direct analysis of major areas; adequacy/effectiveness of systems or analysis of perceptions of
populations and institutions.
2.2.2. Number (broken down by gender and, if possible, by vulnerable groups defined in the area of intervention) of people
3.1. Number and type (in separate columns) at local level.
3.2. Number
4.1. Number and type
4. 2. Number and type (entered in separate columns)
5. Number of interventions by type of natural
asset and intervention 6.1. Number and type (in separate
columns of monitoring plan)
6.2. Income sources per household; description of income source and number of households.
7.1. Number/Sector
7.2. Number; Effectiveness (see previous indicator) through enforcement level.

22 For Website PPRAF2015 Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

22 For Website PPRAF2015 Final

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

22 For Website PPRAF2015 Final

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Period of Report (Dates)

List the Website address

01 November 2014 to 31 Octoberl 2015

November, 2015-January 2016 (MTR - ongoing), November 1, 2017 (Terminal - planned)

Eng. Angelina Madete

Lars Christiansen, UNEP task manager

Vice President's Office

Output 1.2: Effective storm and

Output 1.3: EIA and feasibility

Output 2.1: Mangrove

Output 2.2: Appropriate

Output 3.1: Performance of a

Output 3.3: Assessment of the

Output 3.4:District level

Output 3.5: One EBICAM action

List outputs planned and Est.

Output 1.2: Effective storm and 860,000.00

Output 1.3: EIA and feasibility 21,799.08

Output 2.2: Appropriate 50,385.00

Output 2.3: Coral reef 25,600.00

Output 3.1: Performance of a -

Output 3.3: Assessment of the -

Output 3.4:District level 20,000.00

Output 3.5: One EBICAM action 27,050.00

Project Execution 56,900.00 Oct-17

Estimated cumulative actual co-

Add any comments on actual co-

Critical Risks Affecting Progress (Not identified at project design)

Progress on Key Milestones Expected Progress

Cleaning up of the drainage channels, Contract an engineering firm for

Component 2 – Ecosystem-based Integrated Coastal Area Management

Appropriate alternative energy Distribute fuel efficient cookstoves to 1,500

Component 3 – Knowledge, coastal monitoring and policy linkages

Policy linkages Document lessons learned from project outputs.

Project operation and management

Procurement Prepare procurement plans

Progress on Key Milestones Expected Progress

Cleaning up of the drainage channels, See above.

EIA and feasibility study See above.

Component 2 – Ecosystem-based Integrated Coastal Area Management

Appropriate alternative energy See above.

Coral reef rehabilitation and protection See above.

Shoreline stabilization through See above.

Stocktaking See above.

Coastal monitoring and assessment See above.

Progress on Key Milestones Expected Progress

Please justify your rating and

Progress to Date Rating

An agreement with UNOPS to upgrade coastal protection was MS

An agreement with UNOPS to upgrade coastal protection was MS

TORs of EIA study developed and TRES Consult (T) Limited S

TORs of rural energy consultant developed. The procurement of the S

TORs of reef specialist developed. The procurement of the MS

Replant native and resilient trees including bushes and grasses in U

Members of CCOT established and its TORs developed. The MU

Partnership on procurement process done with the VPO S

The National Project Coordinator appointed. S

completeling the Rating section

Provide specific recommendations for next steps. . (word