Research 1 5

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 48

THE LEVEL OF READING COMPETENCY OF INTERMEDIATE

STUDENTS IN STA.CRUZ SOUTH DISTRICT:

BASIS FOR INTERVENTION

DELOS SANTOS, JONARD A.

EDQUILA, NOAH R.

MANGONON, CASEY D.

ECHON, HAMRA M.

EBEN, MARY JANE M.

IGLESIA, MICO S.

A Thesis Proposal

Submitted in Partial Fulfillment of the Requirements

for the Course Introduction to Research

Bachelor of Elementary Education

College of Education

President Ramon Magsaysay State University

May 30 , 2024
Chapter 1

INTRODUCTION

Background of the study

In this chapter, the overall aim and justification of the study will be outlined. It will also

provide the background of the study and statement of the problem, and will highlight the

research questions and objectives set by this study.

The level of reading competencies among intermediate students in the South District of

Sta. Cruz is a critical aspect of their academic development. As a student they flock together

in learning what is reading, including the background of knowledge, vocabulary, language

structures (syntax, semantics), the print-sound relationship and decoding. (Scarborough,

2002). Research has shown that proficient reading skills are essential for overall academic

success and future opportunities (Mullis., I, Martin, Kennedy, & Foy P. PIRL 2016). However,

various factors can impact students' reading abilities, including instructional practices, home

environment, and individual learning differences (Martin N. O., Mullis., V, Hooper, M., HAN,

S., TIMS AND PIRLS 2017). From a global perspective, the "International Assessment of

Reading Literacy" conducted by (Mullis et al. 2016) emphasizes the importance of early

literacy interventions in fostering proficient reading skills among students. This underscores

the significance of addressing reading challenges at an early stage to prevent further academic

difficulties. (Park, 2018) explores factors influencing reading comprehension in the Korean

EFL context, emphasizing the importance of vocabulary knowledge, reading strategies, and

motivation.

Similarly, (Alqahtani, 2015) investigates reading comprehension strategies among

Saudi Arabian EFL learners, highlighting the efficacy of explicit instruction in reading

strategies like predicting and summarizing. Furthermore, (Martin & Park, 2017) highlight in

their study "Reading Achievement Trends in International Context: An Analysis of PIRLS

2016 " the role of instructional practices and home environment in shaping reading
achievement trends across different countries. This suggests that interventions targeting both

classroom instruction and home support are crucial for improving reading competencies

among intermediate students. These studies collectively underscore the need for a

comprehensive understanding of the factors influencing reading competencies among

intermediate students. By identifying the basis of intervention through a thorough analysis of

global, foreign, and local studies, educators can develop targeted strategies to enhance reading

skills and promote academic success among students in the South District of Sta. Cruz.

Significance of the Study

The significance of the study on reading competency of intermediate students as a basis

for intervention lies in its potential to address a critical issue in education of Sta. Cruz South

District.

This research is beneficial to the following:

Students. This study will benefit the students directly from this research through enhanced

literacy skills, which are fundamental for academic success across all subjects.

Parents. This study will help parents to gain insights into their child's reading abilities and

will enable them to understand how they can support their child's literacy development at

home. With a clearer understanding of their child's strengths and weaknesses, parents will be

able to engage in more effective communication with educators and will be able to implement

literacy-promoting activities outside of the classroom.

Educators. This study will help educators to gain a deeper understanding of their students'

needs and will enable them to implement evidence-based strategies to improve reading skills.

Policy makers. This study will serve as a guide for policymakers who will benefit from this

research by using the findings to inform educational policies and initiatives aimed at

improving reading proficiency at the intermediate level. By addressing literacy challenges


early on, policymakers will be able to contribute to long-term improvements in academic

achievement and overall educational outcomes.

Future Researcher. This study will contribute to the advancement of knowledge in the field

of literacy education and will ultimately enhance reading competency among intermediate

students in Sta. Cruz and beyond. Future researchers will be able to explore additional factors

that may influence reading competency, such as socio-economic status, parental involvement,

or teaching methodologies.

Statement of the Problem

Research objective: What are the factors affecting the reading comprehension of intermediate

level learners in Sta. Cruz South District.

The research will be conducted to identify the impact of the level of reading competency of

intermediate students in Sta. Cruz South District: Basis for Intervention.

Specifically, this study will answers the following questions:

1.What are the respondents profile in terms of;

1.1. Age; and

1.2. Gender;?

2. How is the level of competency of intermediate- level learners?

2.1. Comprehension;

2.1.1. Inferential

2.1.2. Literal

2.1.3. Evaluative/Critical

3.How may the following educational and non- educational factors affect the reading

comprehension of the learners in terms of;


3.1. Home-related factor;

3.1.1. Family interaction;

3.1.2. Self esteem from the family;

4. Is there significant differences in reading competency levels based on home-related factor;

parents’ educational attainment, parents’ occupation; number of siblings?

5. What action plan can be proposed to enhance student reading competencies?

Scope and Limitation

This study focuses on the investigating the effectiveness of current teaching

methods and instructional strategies in promoting reading comprehension in south district of

Sta Cruz. The data collection will be conducted to 108 randomly selected intermediate

students in the South District of Sta. Cruz School year 2023-2024 who will represent the

population. This study will not cover other problems that are not consider as one of the

reading competencies. Each of the respondents is given the same questionnaires to answer.

The results of this study will be applicable only to the respondents of this study and will not

be used as a measure to the Level of reading competency who do not belong to the population

of this study. The main source of data will be the questionnaire, which is prepared by the

researchers
Chapter 2

FRAMEWORK OF THE STUDY

In this chapter, it will provide a brief background and a general picture of the southern

schools of Sta. Cruz, Zambales' educational context and some information regarding the

economic, political, and social systems in order to understand the factors that will influence

English as a Foreign Language teaching and learning, especially reading comprehension skill

development at the southern schools of Sta. Cruz, Zambales.

Review of related Literature

Reading comprehension

It plays a significant role in the total functioning of our community. It is also one of the

pillars of reading. A person may know how to read certain words, but comprehension is

something that is developed, practiced, learned, and experienced over time. One can read

terms like "dog," "banana," or "walk," simple words with known meanings but, Reading

Comprehension is way more profound than that. It is the ability to define word by word and

create a profound idea from the talks given or read (K-12 Reader, 2018).

Moreover, reading comprehension also includes the ability of a person to translate the

essence of the sentences using his own words. This also consists of applying the text read in

one's life. One aspect of reading comprehension is when a person articulates some of his life

experiences and relates them to the text written. It is a sign that a person truly comprehends

because some personal emotions are attached to it (Wilhelm, 2018).. On a global level, (Snow,

Burns, and Griffin, 1998) conducted a comprehensive study on preventing reading difficulties

in young children, emphasizing the importance of early intervention and support to foster

reading competency. The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD,

2002) published a report titled "Reading for Change: Performance and Engagement Across

Countries," which examined reading performance and engagement among students from

various nations. Additionally, the program for International Student Assessment (PISA, 2018)
provided valuable insights into students' reading abilities, knowledge, and skills across

different countries. Foreign studies have also contributed significantly to our understanding of

reading competency. (Hattie and Yates, 2013) conducted research on "Visible Learning and

the Science of How We Learn," highlighting effective teaching practices that enhance reading

competency. (Kendeou, Van den Broek, White, and Lynch, 2009) investigated the independent

contributions of oral language and decoding skills in predicting reading comprehension

among early elementary school students.

(Torgesen, 1999 and Ferrer, 2016) focused on preventing reading failure in young children

with phonological processing disabilities, examining group and individual responses to

instruction. researchers have conducted studies in Sta. Cruz, Laguna, to gain insights into the

factors influencing reading competencies among intermediate students. (Ferrer, 2016)

explored the factors affecting the reading comprehension skills of Grade 6 pupils in public

elementary schools, providing valuable information for the development of targeted

interventions. These studies emphasize the importance of early intervention, effective

teaching practices, and understanding factors that influence reading abilities. However, there

is a gap in exploring the impact of home-related factors on students' reading competencies.

Understanding how home environments, parental involvement, access to resources, and socio-

economic factors affect reading skills is crucial for developing targeted interventions. By

investigating the influence of home-related factors on reading competencies, educators and

policymakers can tailor strategies to support students effectively, especially in the Sta. Cruz

South District and similar communities.

Parental literacy involvement in their children’s literacy in which parental interact with

their children’s learning. The major benefit of parental literacy intervention on literacy is that

children can receive knowledge through the interaction with their parents (Johnson, Martin,

Brooks-Gunn, and Petrill,2008; Senechal, 2006). This research can provide valuable insights

into addressing challenges and improving reading outcomes by considering the holistic

environment in which students learn and develop their reading abilities. (Manalang, 2018)
examined the relationship between reading proficiency and academic performance among

Grade 4 students, shedding light on the importance of reading skills for overall achievement.

(Santos, 2020) conducted a study on the reading level of intermediate students in the South

District of Sta. Cruz, further contributing to our understanding of local reading competencies.

When it comes to comprehension, understanding and interpreting the meaning of the text is a

critical aspect of reading competency. (Pressley and Afflerbach, 1995) conducted research on

verbal protocols of reading, shedding light on the nature of constructively responsive reading

and the strategies employed by proficient readers. (Perfetti and Stafura, 2014) focused on

word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension, examining how vocabulary and word

understanding impact overall comprehension abilities.

Literal level comprehension

As a low level of comprehension encompasses behaviors in the learning process that are

said to be crucial as the foundation of higher-level comprehension growth. According to

(Saadatnia et al.,2017), literal understanding necessitates students extracting specific

information from a paragraph. This requires the capacity to process words individually and

recognize individual words in order to derive meaning from a long string of words that

includes propositions and sentences. Literal reading comprehension should contain the

context, facts, and sequence that can exist in a text, according to research. The context can be

defined as the entire image formed by the correlation of facts, where facts are information

placed in a text and sequences are how the information is organized in chronological order of

occurrences. This level of understanding also requires pupils to determine the correct and

accurate meaning of words or terminology used in a book at the word or sentence level, to

gather information from reading, and to paraphrase what they learn. This diagram depicts the

skills that students should have mastered by the end of the literal reading course.

Inferential level comprehension


Is an ability required to understand and interpret daily life scenes, from personal

conversations to problem-solving situations (PROCAILO; WOELFER; TOMITCH, 2020). To

make sense of the world, people must infer how the pieces of information available form a

meaningful whole according to their background knowledge. In reading, drawing an inference

involves accessing “...the implicit meaning of a written text on the basis of two sources of

information: the propositional content of the text (i.e., the information explicitly stated) and

prior knowledge of the reader” (CHIKALANGA, 1992). Inferential level comprehension it

has a prominent role in reading research, with several studies investigating the process in

various contexts. In what follows, we present some relevant aspects regarding reading models,

inference taxonomies, measures of inferential comprehension, text types, individual

differences, and first (L1) and second language (L2) research.

Several researchers have proposed models of reading comprehension where inference

generation has great prominence (Gagne; Yekovich, 1993, Kintsch, Van Dijk, 1978; Van Den

Broek, 1999). For instance, according to (Gagné and colleague, 1993), inferential

comprehension is a highly demanding cognitive task that involves three subprocesses. In the

first one, integration, two or more propositions are joined together to create a representation

of the ideas in the text. Secondly, in summarization, readers extract the main idea from the

text and its highlights. In the third subprocess, known as elaboration, readers

electroencephalogram (EEG) and functional magnetic resonance imaging (Van Den Broek ;

Kendeou, 2022). Other online measures encompass think-aloud protocols and questions

answered during reading or listening, which may alter the developing representation of the

text (TOMITCH, 2007). For this reason, researchers emphasize the need to combine these

methods to capture the various dimensions involved in inferential comprehension (VAN DEN

BROEK; KENDEOU, 2022).

Critical / Evaluative comprehension

It can be considered as means to activate or construct schema. Critical comprehension

provides an explanation for activating existing schemata and for constructing new ones by
contrasting ideas and engaging in reflective thinking (Norris and Phillips, 1987) .

Moreover, count inference-making as a way to activate schemata in terms of filling in the

missing connections between the surface structure fragments of the text by recourse to content

and knowledge about the world. (Collins et al., 1980) .

Schema theory has special relevance for teachers of reading comprehension in that it

questions the traditional view that students should learn to reproduce the statements being

read in the text (McNeil, 1992) . In contrast to this older view of reading comprehension,

schema theory stresses an interactive approach that views teaching reading comprehension as

a process, meaning that students are taught techniques for processing text, such as making

inference, activating prior knowledge, and using critical thinking (McNeil, 1992, Aloqaili,

2005a, Orbea and Villabeitia, 2010).

The schema theory has the major influence on new views of reading and reading

comprehension. New views have forced us to rethink the act of reading. For a long time we

thought reading was the reproduction of the ideas on the page; our goal was to have students

produce a “photocopy” of the page. (Tierney and Pearson, 1986) Schema theory has moved us

away from a reproductive view to a constructive view. In that view, the reader, rather than the

text moves to the center of the construction process. According to schema theory, there are no

definitive or final conclusions that can be reached for the text (Norris and Phillips, 1987, Yu-

hui et al., 2010). That is, schema theory deals with the reading comprehension as an

interactive process between readers’ prior knowledge and the text being read. Sometimes a

reader may end up with a different understanding, based on his or her total previous

experiences: their richness or paucity. Therefore a reader with a rich background will

comprehend better than one who has a poorer background. In short, schema theory believes in

open text or context. The interpretation is relative (Aloqaili, 2005). For the purpose of the

study, reading comprehension can be defined as the meaning constructed as a result of the

complex and interactive processes relating a reader’s critical thinking, prior knowledge, and

inference-making Foreign studies by (Kintsch, 1998, Cain and Oakhill, 2011) have explored
reading comprehension difficulties, their correlates, causes, and consequences. These studies

provide valuable insights into the various factors that can impact students' ability to

comprehend written text, such as cognitive processes, background knowledge, and vocabulary

skills. At the local level, (Estacio, 2015) conducted a study on factors affecting reading

comprehension among Grade 7 students in the South District of Sta. Cruz, further enhancing

our understanding of local reading comprehension challenges. (Dela Cruz, 2019) examined

the reading comprehension skills of intermediate students in Sta. Cruz, Laguna, contributing

to the body of knowledge on local reading competencies and identifying potential areas for

improvement. In conclusion, the review of related literature on the level of reading

competencies of intermediate students in the South District of Sta. Cruz underscores the

significance of both reading and comprehension components. The studies conducted globally,

foreign, and locally provide valuable insights into the multifaceted factors that influence

students' reading abilities. These findings serve as a solid foundation for developing effective

interventions and strategies to enhance students' reading competencies in the South District of

Sta. Cruz and beyond.

Theoretical framework

According to Peregoy and Boyle (2005), that reading is a set of skills that involves making

sense and deriving meaning from the printed words. For second language learners, there are

three different elements that impact reading: the child's background knowledge, the child’s

linguistic knowledge of the target language and the strategy or techniques the child uses to

tackle the text. What is presented by Peregoy and Boyle is an ideal framework for reading

teaching and learning. Like as in reading learning process at English Study Program UIN

Mataram has a vision of producing educators who are proficient in English reading. Students

are also able to use appropriate reading strategies to understand information implicitly in the

text, interpret textual content, recognize discourse markers, to identify the structure of texts, to

develop and analyze different types of texts. In the preliminary study, the researcher found the

main problem of reading comprehension learning that comes from students, lecture, and
facility of learning. Some students are not able to use reading strategies to comprehend the

meaning.

Problems sourced from students related to the learning process in the classroom. These are;

1) students still have difficulty interpreting the meaning of texts or synthesizing words,

phrases or sentences into the precise meanings desired by the author's context;

2) a less reading source;

3) there are still many students who failed in reading learning, and

4) learning that is still centered on the teacher.

Cunningham &Stanovich (Willis, 2008) to comprehend text, the reader must be able to

decode words or recognize words and access text integration processes to construct meaning

and retain the content of the words long enough for it to stimulate their stores of related

information in their long-term memories. Beginning comprehension instruction builds on

children’s linguistic and conceptual knowledge (Snow, Burns, & Griffin, 1998 in Willis 2008)

and includes explicit instruction on strategies such as summarizing, predicting, and self-

monitoring for understanding.

Thus, it can be concluded that in understanding the first-order readings that the reader must do

is to understand each word with the stored meaning and integrate it as a whole. The specific

problem of reading comprehension that had found in the last research at English program UIN

Mataram include finding new vocabulary, clarification of key concepts, linking to prior

knowledge and personal relevance, instruction in strategies, student-centered discussions

about the content, previewing, predicting, summarizing, selecting main ideas, self-monitoring,

and teacher feedback for understanding. In reading comprehension learning is not only to

understand the context meaning but also broader learning. As said by Oakhill (2015) that

reading comprehension is important, not just for understanding text, but for broader learning,

success in education, and employment. It is even important for our social lives, because of

email, text, and social networking sites. Reading comprehension is a complex task, which
requires the orchestration of many different cognitive skills and abilities. So, reading

comprehension is not only understands the content but more broadly for learning, the success

of education and work processes, but also for the benefit of social life.

According to Grabe and Stoller (2002), reading for understanding is the ability to understand

information in text and interpret it appropriately. Its different argument from Thomas Barret in

Brassell and Rasinski (2008) has suggested the following three types of action with his three-

level taxonomy of reading comprehension;

1) Literal Comprehension: Literal comprehension, the lowest of the three levels, requires a

reader to be able to retell or recall the facts or information presented in a text.

2) Inferential Comprehension: Inferential comprehension, the next level, refers to the ability

of a reader to take in information that is inferred or implied within a text.

3) Critical Comprehension: Critical or evaluative comprehension, the third and highest level

in the taxonomy, involves making critical judgments about the information presented in the

text. All three levels of comprehension are important and need to be assessed. Another

suggests that assessment of reading ability does not end with a measurement of

understanding. Assessment of reading ability has a different purpose. Measurement of reading

comprehension should help teachers monitor students' understanding and provide useful

information for designing reading comprehension programs (Klinger, 2007). So it can be

concluded that the comprehension of reading content has a diversity of types or types. It aims

to learners or students able to have the ability to understand the reading as needed. Problem

development to understand the reading also related to the learning process undertaken.

Traditional multiple-choice reading assessments are often intended to assess low-level

comprehension strategies rather than imaginative and interpretive stances. In a lecture

delivered at Teacher’s College, Hill (Israel et al., 200) described the tensions between low-

level operations and the more constructivist responses, which the distracters on multiple-

choice tests often stimulate. In some contemporary assessment programs, different from
traditional multiple-choice appraisals include the type of open questions that require students

to interpret the text and maintain their interpretation. Contemporary assessments, such as the

National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP), have such types of traditional

assessments of multiple choice and open-ended questions that require explanation. A different

opinion emerged from Snow (2002) that reading comprehension as the process of

simultaneously extracting and constructing meaning through interaction and involvement with

written language. We use the words extracting and constructing to emphasize both the

importance and the insufficiency of the text as a determinant of reading comprehension.

Comprehension entails three elements: the reader who is doing the comprehending, the text

that is to be comprehended, the activity in which comprehension is a part. From the

framework of the elements that build the process of reading comprehension. Maria and Nikki

(2008) have developed a reading comprehension learning model. This model is a development

of the Snow model described earlier. This model can be done to improve the quality of the

reading comprehension ability. Therefore, the researcher replaces the previously used learning

strategy of lectures with learning strategies to understand the contents of reading. Strategies

are relating to the cognitive, metacognitive and affective components of the SQ4R strategy.

This strategy provides an opportunity for students to study systematically, effectively and

efficiently.
Conceptual Framework

To support the Theoretical Framework, he conceptual Framework will develop the

framework provides three frames consisted of Input, process, and output.

INPUT PROCESS OUTPUT

1.What are the profile of Data Implemen

respondents in terms of; collection ting early

1.1 Age Survey interventi

Questionnaire on
1.2 Sex
programs:
Data Analysis
2. How is the level of
It is
comprehension of Percentage
crucial to
intermediate- level
Frequency support
learners?
students
Statistical
2.1. Fluency in the
Treatment
early
2.2. Vocabulary
(ANOVA)
stages of
2.3.Comprehension
reading
2.3.1.Inferential
developm

2.3.2.Literal ent. These

programs
2.3.3.Critical
should
3.How may the following
focus on
non- educational factors
building
affect comprehension of the
foundatio
learners in terms of:
Null Hypotheses

There is no significant difference in reading competence level based on home-related factor

parent’ educational attainment, parent’ occupation; number of sibling; teacher educational

attainment

There is no significant difference in the level of reading competency of intermediate grades in

southern schools of Sta Cruz district

Definition of terms

To facilitate the understanding of this study, different terms are defined herein.

Competency. Refers to the ability or skill level that an individual possesses in a particular

area or field.

Intermediate Level Learners. This refers to the Students who are at a middle level of

proficiency or skill in a particular subject.

Inferential Comprehension. This refers to the ability to draw conclusions or make inferences

based on information that is implied but not explicitly stated in the text.

Literal Comprehension. This refers to the ability to understand and recall explicit

information directly stated in the text.

Evaluative Comprehension. This refers to the ability to analyze and assess the content of the

text, often involving critical thinking and judgment.

Intervention. Refers to a deliberate and planned action or strategy implemented to modify,

improve, or address a specific issue or problem.


Chapter 3

METHODOLOGY

This chapter describe the research Methodology, it refers to the systematic approach or set of

procedures used in a particular field of study or research to gather, analyze, and interpret data

or information. It outlines the methods, techniques, and tools employed to address research

questions, achieve research objectives, and draw conclusions. It provides a structured and

systematic way to ensure the reliability, validity, and rigor of research outcomes.

Research Design

In this research, the researcher used a descriptive design to conduct a quantitative study on

intermediate students' reading ability. The descriptive method of utilizing questionnaires

enables systematic data collection and analysis, offering insights into the prevalence, patterns,

and traits of reading skills among this group. To easily collect quantitative data from a large

sample, researchers can detect trends, correlations, and probable factors influencing reading

ability by using questionnaires. For educators, students, parents, and policymakers looking to

enhance literacy instruction and support solutions catered to the needs of intermediate

students

According to (Williams, 2007) descriptive research a research method that can determine the

situation in the current phenomenon. (Nassaji, 2015) also stated that the goal of descriptive

research. is drawing and classifying the phenomenon. In addition, (Walliman, 2011) defined

descriptive research as relating to an observation in collecting the data. The questionnaire will

be solicited to the students at southern schools in Sta.Cruz. The result will have correlation to

the student’s profile.


Respondents and location.

The respondents will be the intermediate level schools of south from Sta.Cruz

Zambales. This study uses a descriptive design with a survey questionnaire as the research

tool. The number of respondents will be computed through the use of the Yamane equation.

Table 1 above shows the frequency distribution of the respondents by school. A total

population of ninety eight (98) intermediate level 4-6. Students at intermediate level will be

the respondents of the research study. The study will be conducted in southern schools of Sta.

Cruz Zambales. The municipality of Sta. Cruz District is located on the coast of the province

of Zambales in the Philippines. It comprises twenty-five barangays, twenty three primary

schools, two integrated schools, and eight secondary schools. The municipality's land area is

equivalent to 12:08 percent of Zambales' total land area and is 438.46 square kilometers

(169.29 square miles).


Table 1.

Distribution of questionnaire to the students in intermediate level from Sta. Cruz South District

No Name of school G-4 G-5 G-6 Total Sample Percentage(%)


. population size

1 Bayto ES 36 38 45 119 17 17.34%

4 Don Brigido 72 83 85 240 34 34.69%


Miraflor(JESMA
G)
8 Naulo ES 39 36 32 107 15 15.30%

Sabang ES 38 28 22 88 12 12.24%

Lupa ES 46 46 54 146 20 20.40%

Total 700 98 100


Table 2

Map of Sta. Cruz South District


Instrument

The survey questionnaire will be use in the research. The researcher will create a series

of survey questionnaires to collect data for the study, which we will distribute to 108

intermediate student in south district schools of Sta. Cruz Zambales An overview of the

opinions and preferences of the people being surveyed is intended by surveys, which are

carried out using structured questionnaires or interviews. They are extensively used in many

different industries, including, but not limited to, the social sciences, marketing, public

opinion research, and healthcare. (Dillman, Smyth, and Christian, 2014) claim that surveys

are an effective method for gathering data because they provide a structured method that

enables quantitative analysis and the exploration of patterns and trends in the data. According

to (Ary, Jacobs, Sorensen, and Walker, 2013), surveys are effective at gathering data from a

large number of respondents and serving as a foundation for recommendations for public

policy.

Data Collection

Total population sampling was used in the study with 98 respondents . Total sampling is

a type of sampling technique whose purpose involves examining the entire population.

The researcher obtained permission approval from the Superintendent of Zambales Province

to send research questionnaire also to the barangay captain of residents of our respondents,

after completing a final draft of research checklist throughs a letter signed by the researcher,

research adviser, and dean respondents. The purpose of the research will be discuss and

explain to the participants so that they can better understand its purpose of the research.
Respondent's responses will be treated as confidential. The researcher picked up the

instrument immediately.

Data Analysis

All data which was collected from the survey questionnaire was organized, processed,

and tabulated, accordingly as to (1) descriptive statistical techniques such as: frequency

counts, simple percentage and weighted mean and (2) inferential statistics such as: Pearson r

and Analysis of Variance. The following are description and explanations of the uses/purposes

of the above-mentioned statistical tools.

1.Frequency Count - This is a simple count of the tallies for each indicator of the variables.

2. Percentage - To answer the questions of the study related to disclosing the ratio distribution

as to respondents' profile, percentage was used.

3. Weighted Mean - To answer the question of the study related to disclosing the General

Weighted Average of the Grade 8 student at (name of school).

4. Likert Scale – composed of specific question in lined with the given indicators to be asked

to the proposed respondents in selecting rating scale ranging from “4– Very Difficult, 3-

Difficult, 2- Easy, and 1- Very Easy”.

Poin Point Qualitative Symbol

t Scal Interpretatio s
e n

4 3.26- Strongly SA

4.00 agree

3 2.51- Agree A

3.25

2 1.76- Disagree DA

2.50

1 1.00- Strongly SD

1.75 Disagree

5. Analysis of Variation/ ANOVA - In testing the significant difference of the responses on

General Weighted Average when respondents will be grouped according to profile variables,

the one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used, The ANOVA was performed at 0.05

level of significance. The ANOVA makes use of the F ratio or variance ratio. The various

groups being compared are assumed to belong to a population with a normal distribution, each

group randomly selected and independent from the other group. The variables from each

group also have standard deviations that are approximately equal (Parreño, 2006).

Point Point Qualitative Symbols

Scale Interpretation

4 3.26- Very VI

4.00 influential

3 2.51- Influential I

3.25

2 1.76- Neutral or do N
2.50 not know

1 1.00- Uninfluential UI

1.75

THE LEVEL OF READING COMPETENCY OF INTERMEDIATE STUDENTS

IN STA.CRUZ SOUTH DISTRICT: BASIS FOR INTERVENTION

Statement of the Problem

1. What is the demographic profile of the parents of respondents in terms of:

1.1. Age;

1.2. Sex;

1.3. Highest educational attainment; and

1.4. Socio-economic status?

2. What is the level of reading comprehension skill of grade 4 learners in terms of:

2.1. Literal comprehension;

2.2. Inferential comprehension; and

2.3. Evaluative comprehension?

3. What is the level of reading comprehension skill of grade 5 learners in terms of:

3.1. Literal comprehension;

3.2. Inferential comprehension; and

3.3. Evaluative comprehension?

4. What is the level of reading comprehension skill of grade 6 learners in terms of:

4.1. Literal comprehension;

4.2. Inferential comprehension; and

4.3. Evaluative comprehension?


5. Is there any significant difference in the reading comprehension of grade 4 learners when grouped

according to demographic profile of their parents?

6. Is there any significant difference in the reading comprehension of grade 5 learners when grouped

according to demographic profile of their parents?

7. Is there any significant difference in the reading comprehension of grade 6 learners when grouped

according to demographic profile of their parents?

2024

Reliability Test

Test of Normality
Chapter 4

Results and Discussions

1. Demographic Profile of Respondents

Table 1

Demographic Profile of Respondents in terms of Age

Age Frequency Percentage (%)


below 18 years old 0 0
18 – 25 years old 15 15.30
26 – 30 years old 27 27.60
31 – 35 years old 39 39.80
36 – 40 years old 11 11.20
above 40 years old 6 6.10
Total 98 100.00

Table 2
Demographic Profile of Respondents in terms of Sex
Sex Frequency Percentage (%)
Male 0 0
Female 98 100.00
Total 98 100.00

Table 3
Demographic Profile of Respondents in terms of Highest Educational Attainment
Highest Educational Attainment Frequency Percentage (%)
Did not finish Elementary 0 0
Elementary Graduate 25 25.50
Did not finish High School 0 0
High School Graduate 35 35.70
Did not finish College 25 25.50
College Graduate 13 13.30
with units in Master’s Degree 0 0
Master’s Degree Holder 0 0
with units in Doctorate Degree 0 0
Doctorate Degree Holder 0 0
Total 98 100.00

Table 4
Demographic Profile of Respondents in terms of Socio-economic Status
Socio-economic Status Frequency Percentage (%)
Less than P12,030 25 25.50
Between P12,031 to P24,060 30 30.60
Between P24,061 to P48,120 20 20.40
Between P48,121 to P84,210 0 0
Between P84,211 to P144,360 23 23.50
Between P144,361 to P240,600 0 0
at least P240,601 0 0
Total 98 100.00

Level of Reading Comprehension Skill of Grade 4 Learners


Table 5
Test Scores of Grade 4 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test
in terms of Literal Comprehension (N = 31)
Correct Incorrect
Questions
n % n %
What did Mia and Jake buy when they first arrived at the
20 64.50 11 35.50
fair?
Name two attractions that were mentioned at the fair. 28 90.30 3 9.70

Table 6
Test Scores of Grade 4 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test
in terms of Inferential Comprehension (N = 31)
Correct Incorrect
Questions
n % n %
Why do you think Mia did not win the pie-eating contest? 25 80.60 6 19.40
Based on the passage, how do you think Jake feels about
29 93.50 2 5.50
animals?
Table 7
Test Scores of Grade 4 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test
in terms of Evaluative Comprehension (N = 31)
Correct Incorrect
Questions
n % n %
What qualities do Mia and Jake have that make them enjoy
24 77.40 7 22.60
the fair?
Do you think the fair was well organized? 14 45.20 17 54.80

Table 8
Test Scores of Grade 4 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test (N = 31)
Test Scores of Grade 4 in Reading Comprehension n %
Table 9 0 0 0.00
Mean 1 0 0.00 and
2 5 16.13
3 1 3.23
4 5 16.13
5 13 41.93
6 7 22.58
Total 31 100.00%
Standard Deviation Test Scores of Grade 4 Learners
in Reading Comprehension Test (N = 31)
Variable x̄ SD
Reading Comprehension of Grade 4 Learners 2.61 0.59

Level of Reading Comprehension Skill of Grade 5 Learners


Table 10
Test Scores of Grade 5 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test
in terms of Literal Comprehension (N = 32)
Correct Incorrect
Questions
n % n %
What is the main idea of the passage? 21 65.63 11 34.37
What did Maria do first to restore the garden? 27 84.38 5 15.62

Table 11
Test Scores of Grade 5 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test
in terms of Inferential Comprehension (N = 32)
Correct Incorrect
Questions
n % n %
Based on the passage, what can we infer about Maria? 30 93.75 2 6.25
How does Maria probably feel about the garden by the end
15 46.88 17 53.12
of the summer?

Table 12
Test Scores of Grade 5 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test
in terms of Evaluative Comprehension (N = 32)
Correct Incorrect
Questions
n % n %
What does the story suggest about the impact of caring for
18 56.25 14 43.75
something neglected?
Evaluate the decision Maria made to restore the garden. Do
15 46.88 17 53.12
you think it was a good use of her time? Why or why not?

Table 13
Test Scores of Grade 5 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test (N = 32)
Test Scores of Grade 5 in Reading Comprehension n %
Table 0 2 6.25 14
Mean 1 3 9.38 and
2 2 6.25
3 2 6.25
4 7 21.88
5 11 34.38
6 5 15.63
Total 32 100.00%
Standard Deviation Test Scores of Grade 5 Learners
in Reading Comprehension Test (N = 32)
Variable x̄ SD
Reading Comprehension of Grade 5 Learners 2.06 0.62
Level of
Reading Comprehension Skill of Grade 6 Learners
Table 15
Test Scores of Grade 6 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test
in terms of Literal Comprehension (N = 35)
Correct Incorrect
Questions
n % n %
What feature of the treehouse swayed gently in the breeze? 29 82.86 6 17.14
What new addition was mentioned as part of the
27 77.14 8 22.86
treehouse's enhancements?

Table 16
Test Scores of Grade 5 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test
in terms of Inferential Comprehension (N = 32)
Correct Incorrect
Questions
n % n %
What does the act of dividing tasks among the friends
25 71.43 10 28.57
suggest about their teamwork?
How might the children have felt when they saw the
30 85.71 5 14.29
completed enhancements on the treehouse?

Table 17
Test Scores of Grade 6 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test
in terms of Evaluative Comprehension (N = 35)
Correct Incorrect
Questions
n % n %
Considering the community’s involvement with the
treehouse over generations, how does the treehouse 26 74.29 9 25.71
contribute to the local culture?
Evaluate the role of storytelling in the passage. How did Eli’s
29 82.86 6 17.14
grandfather’s stories influence the children's project?

Table 18
Test Scores of Grade 5 Learners in Reading Comprehension Test (N = 35)
Test Scores of Grade 6 in Reading Comprehension n %
0 0 0.00
Table 1 4 11.43 14
Mean 2 2 5.71 and
3 2 5.71
4 3 8.57
5 3 8.57
6 21 60.00
Total 35 100.00%
Standard Deviation Test Scores of Grade 6 Learners
in Reading Comprehension Test (N = 35)
Variable x̄ SD
Reading Comprehension of Grade 6 Learners 2.06 0.63
Significant difference in the reading comprehension of grade 4 learners when grouped according to
demographic profile of their parents

Table _
Significant Difference of Reading Comprehension of Grade 4 Learners
when grouped according to Age of their Parent
Variable Kruskal- df p-value Interpretation Decision
Wallis H
Age of Parent Reject the
Statistically
Reading Comprehension of Grade 4 26.215 4 0.000 Null
Significant
Learners Hypothesis
*Significant at the 0.05 level
Table _
Significant Difference of Reading Comprehension of Grade 4 Learners when grouped according to Highest
Educational Attainment of their Parent
Variable Kruskal- df p-value Interpretation Decision
Wallis H
Highest Educational Attainment
Reject the
of Parent Statistically
26.411 3 0.000 Null
Reading Comprehension of Grade 4 Significant
Hypothesis
Learners
*Significant at the 0.05 level

Table _
Significant Difference of Reading Comprehension of Grade 4 Learners when grouped according to Socio-
economic Status of their Parent
Variable Kruskal- df p-value Interpretation Decision
Wallis H
Socio-economic Status of Parent Reject the
Statistically
Reading Comprehension of Grade 4 27.175 3 0.000 Null
Significant
Learners Hypothesis
*Significant at the 0.05 level

Significant difference in the reading comprehension of grade 5 learners when grouped according to
demographic profile of their parents
Table _
Significant Difference of Reading Comprehension of Grade 5 Learners
when grouped according to Age of their Parent
Variable Kruskal- df p-value Interpretation Decision
Wallis H
Age of Parent Reject the
Statistically
Reading Comprehension of Grade 5 27.170 4 0.000 Null
Significant
Learners Hypothesis
*Significant at the 0.05 level
Table _
Significant Difference of Reading Comprehension of Grade 5 Learners when grouped according to Highest
Educational Attainment of their Parent
Variable Kruskal- df p-value Interpretation Decision
Wallis H
Highest Educational Attainment
Reject the
of Parent Statistically
26.967 3 0.000 Null
Reading Comprehension of Grade 5 Significant
Hypothesis
Learners
*Significant at the 0.05 level
Table _
Significant Difference of Reading Comprehension of Grade 5 Learners when grouped according to Socio-
economic Status of their Parent
Variable Kruskal- df p-value Interpretation Decision
Wallis H
Socio-economic Status of Parent Reject the
Statistically
Reading Comprehension of Grade 5 28.457 3 0.000 Null
Significant
Learners Hypothesis
*Significant at the 0.05 level

Significant difference in the reading comprehension of grade 6 learners when grouped according to
demographic profile of their parents
Table _
Significant Difference of Reading Comprehension of Grade 6 Learners
when grouped according to Age of their Parent
Variable Kruskal- df p-value Interpretation Decision
Wallis H
Age of Parent Reject the
Statistically
Reading Comprehension of Grade 6 26.012 4 0.000 Null
Significant
Learners Hypothesis
*Significant at the 0.05 level
Table _
Significant Difference of Reading Comprehension of Grade 6 Learners when grouped according to Highest
Educational Attainment of their Parent
Variable Kruskal- df p-value Interpretation Decision
Wallis H
Highest Educational Attainment
Reject the
of Parent Statistically
24.938 3 0.000 Null
Reading Comprehension of Grade 6 Significant
Hypothesis
Learners
*Significant at the 0.05 level
Table _
Significant Difference of Reading Comprehension of Grade 5 Learners when grouped according to Socio-
economic Status of their Parent
Variable Kruskal- df p-value Interpretation Decision
Wallis H
Socio-economic Status of Parent Reject the
Statistically
Reading Comprehension of Grade 5 25.948 3 0.000 Null
Significant
Learners Hypothesis
*Significant at the 0.05 level

REFERENCES

Soto, C., Gutierrez de Blume, A. P., Rebolledo, V., Rodríguez, F., Palma, D., & Gutiérrez, F.

(2023). Metacognition and Learning, 18(1), 113-134

Cheng, J., & Matthews, J. (2018). Language Testing, 35(1), 3-25.

Mohammed, G. M. S. (2022). Journal of Language and Linguistic Studies, 18(Spec Iss 1),

627-639.

Caraig, R. V., & Quimbo, M. A. T. (2022). International Journal of Curriculum and

Instruction, 14(3), 1983-2010.

Bartolome, M. T., Mamat, N., & Masnan, A. H. (2017). Parental involvement in the

Philippines. International Journal of Early Childhood Education Care, 6, 41-50. ISSN 2289-

3156 / eISSN 2550-1763

Brown, R.,Coy-Ogan, L. (1993). The Evolution of Transactional Strategies Instruction in One

Teacher's Classroom. The Elementary School Journal, 94(2), 221-233.

Tinapay, A., Seno, R., Fernandez, D. L., Samillano, J., & Tirol, S. (2021). Exploring Student

Reading Comprehension and Parental Intervention: A Literature Review.

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5856326
Rondon, T., & Neves, P. (2023). A scoping review of inferential reading comprehension

research in the present decade. World Journal on Education and Humanities Research, 4(1),

21-29.

Aloqaili, A. S. (2012). The relationship between reading comprehension and critical thinking:

A theoretical study. Journal of King Saud University - Languages and Translation, 24(1), 35-

41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksult.2011.01.001

Bruggink, M., Swart, N., van der Lee, A., & Segers, E. (2022). Theories of Reading

Comprehension. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95266-21

APPENDIX

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Dear Respondents:

Please provide the necessary data information that will help for the completion of our study.

We will assure the data that you will provide shall be treated with utmost confidentiality and

anonymity.

Very truly yours,

DELOS SANTOS, JONARD A.

EBEN, MARY JANE M.

ECHON, HAMRA M.

EDQUILA, NOAH R.
IGLESIA, MICO S.

MANGONON, CASEY D.

_______________________________

Researchers

Barangay Captain Consent

April 29, 2024

To Whom It May Concern:

The undersigned are currently conducting their research entitled “THE LEVEL OF

READING COMPETENCY OF INTERMEDIATE STUDENTS IN STA.CRUZ SOUTH

DISTRICT: BASIS FOR INTERVENTION.” In this regard, we may ask permission from

you as Barangay Captain to please also allow student in your Barangay to be one of our

respondents on this survey questionnaire. Rest assured that the data of your child’s response

shall be treated with utmost confidentiality and anonymity.

Thank you and God bless.

Researcher;

DELOS SANTOS, JONARD A.

EBEN, MARY JANE M.

ECHON, HAMRA M.

EDQUILA, NOAH R.
IGLESIA, MICO S.

MANGONON, CASEY D.

Noted:

__________, 2024

________________________________

SIGNATURE OVER PRINTED NAME

SURVEY QUESTIONNAIRE

Part 1. Demographic Profile of Parents

Instructions: Supply the information being asked in each item by marking ( / )the correct

choice regarding the demographic profile of the parent teaching the child to read.

1. Age

_ below 18

_ 18 – 23 years old

_ 24 – 29 years old

_ 30 – 35 years old

_ 36 – 41 years old

_ 42 – 47 years old

_ 48 – 53 years old
_ 54 – 59 years old

_ 60 – 65 years old

_ 66 – 71 years old

_ 72 – 77 years old

_ 78 – 83 years old

_ 84 – and above
2. Sex

_ Male

_ Female
3. Highest Educational Attainment

_ Did not finish Elementary

_ Elementary Graduate

_ Did not finish High School

_ High School Graduate

_ Did not finish College

_ College Graduate

_ with units in Master’s Degree

_ Master’s Degree Holder

_ with units in Doctorate Degree

_ Doctorate Degree Holder

4. Socio-economic Status (per Month)

_ Less than P12,030

_ Between P12,031 to P24,060

_ Between P24,061 to P48,120

_ Between P48,121 to P84,210

_ Between P84,211 to P144,360

_ Between P144,361 to P240,600

_ at least P240,601
Part 2. Reading Comprehension Test

Instructions: Facilitated by the researcher with guidance by the teacher, the student will read

the passage then answer the questions after the passage by choosing the correct choice among

the options for each item.

FOR GRADE 4

Mia and her brother Jake were excited. Today was the annual community fair, and they

had been waiting for it all summer. The fair had everything from games and rides to contests

and food stalls. Mia's favorite was the pie-eating contest, while Jake looked forward to the pet

show, where he could see all kinds of animals.

When they arrived, the first thing they did was rush to the ticket booth to buy their all-day

passes. With their passes in hand, they went straight to the pet show. Jake was amazed at the

variety of animals. There were dogs doing tricks, cats in fancy costumes, and even a small

pen with baby goats.

After the pet show, Mia reminded Jake about the pie-eating contest. They hurried over

just in time to register. Mia joined the other participants at the table and waited for the contest

to start. Jake cheered her on from the sidelines.

The whistle blew, and they all started eating as fast as they could. Mia tried her best,

but she couldn’t keep up with the defending champion, who was next to her. In the end, she

didn't win, but she was happy because she had a lot of fun. Jake gave her a big thumbs up,

and they went off to enjoy the rest of the fair's attractions.
QUESTIONS: A

1. Literal Comprehension:

1.1. What did Mia and Jake buy when they first arrived at the fair?

A) Ice cream

B) All-day passes

C) A map of the fair

D) Tickets for a single ride

1.2. Name two attractions that were mentioned at the fair.

A) A magic show and a roller coaster

B) A pet show and a pie-eating contest

C) A fireworks display and a dance performance

D) A music concert and a balloon ride

2. Inferential Comprehension:

2.1. Why do you think Mia did not win the pie-eating contest?

A) She was not hungry.

B) She was too slow.

C) The defending champion was next to her.

D) She let someone else win.

2.2. Based on the passage, how do you think Jake feels about animals?

A) He is afraid of them.
B) He is indifferent to them.

C) He is amazed by them.

D) He dislikes them.

3.Evaluative/Critical Comprehension:

3.1. What qualities do Mia and Jake have that make them enjoy the fair?

A) Competitiveness and enthusiasm

B) Curiosity and friendliness

C) Patience and calmness

D) Adventurousness and cheerfulness

3.2. Do you think the fair was well organized?

A) Yes, because there were a variety of activities available.

B) No, because the attractions were not interesting.

C) Yes, because there were too many people.

D) No, because the tickets were too expensive.

FOR GRADE 5

Maria stumbled upon a hidden garden while wandering near the edge of her village.

Overgrown and neglected, the garden was shielded by tall hedges and a rusting iron gate.

Maria pushed the gate open, its hinges squeaking in protest. Inside, she discovered rows of

wilted flowers and wild bushes bearing unripe berries. Amidst the tangles, an old stone

fountain stood silent, its flow long ceased.

As Maria explored further, she noticed that beneath the layers of dust and debris, the garden

held remnants of beauty: stone pathways, intricate sculptures, and a small pond teeming with
life. She imagined how the garden must have looked in its prime, vibrant and bustling with

color and sounds. The idea struck her; she could restore the garden.

Over the next few weeks, Maria returned every afternoon. She pruned the overgrown bushes,

cleared the pathways, and fixed the broken fountain. With each passing day, the garden began

to revive, gradually revealing its former glory.

By summer's end, the garden was transformed. Flowers bloomed brightly, the pond was clear,

and the fountain sang once again with flowing water. Maria felt a deep connection to the

place that had become her secret sanctuary, a hidden slice of paradise that she had brought

back to life.
QUESTIONS: B

1. Literal Comprehension:

1.1. What is the main idea of the passage?

A) Maria finds an old book about gardens.

B) Maria restores a neglected garden in her village.

C) Maria learns about gardening from her grandmother.

D) Maria sells flowers in the village market.

1.2. What did Maria do first to restore the garden?

A) She pruned the overgrown bushes.

B) She cleaned the stone sculptures.

C) She refilled the pond with water.

D) She planted new flowers.

2. Inferential Comprehension:

2.1. Based on the passage, what can we infer about Maria? (Inferential)

A) She is creative and hard-working.

B) She is new to the village.

C) She dislikes the outdoors.

D) She is afraid of getting dirty.

2.2. How does Maria probably feel about the garden by the end of the summer? (Inferential)

A) Frustrated and tired.

B) Indifferent and detached.

C) Proud and connected.


D) Worried and anxious.

3. Evaluative/Critical:

3.1. What does the story suggest about the impact of caring for something neglected?

A) It is a waste of time.

B) It can bring joy and a sense of accomplishment.

C) It makes no difference.

D) It is less important than buying new things.

3.2. Evaluate the decision Maria made to restore the garden. Do you think it was a good use

of her time? Why or why not?

A) Yes, because it brought the garden and her skills to life.

B) No, because she could have spent her time studying.

C) Yes, because it made the village more beautiful.

D) No, because the garden will just get overgrown again


FOR GRADE 6

Every summer, Eli and his friends gathered at the old oak tree on the corner of Elm Park. This

wasn't just any oak tree; it was home to their magnificent treehouse. Built by generations of

neighborhood kids, the treehouse was equipped with mismatched wooden planks for walls, a

collection of colorful glass windows, and a rope ladder that swayed gently in the breeze.

One sunny morning, as Eli climbed up to the treehouse, he noticed that one of the planks was

loose. He remembered his grandfather telling him stories about how the community came

together to build and maintain the treehouse. Inspired, Eli decided it was time to take care of

their beloved retreat.

Gathering his friends, Eli shared his plan to repair and enhance the treehouse. They divided

tasks among themselves—collecting materials, designing new features, and fixing the

existing structure. Throughout the summer, the children worked together, learning new skills

and strengthening their bond. By the end of the season, the treehouse was not only restored

but also boasted new additions like a periscope and a weathervane.

This project taught them the importance of teamwork, persistence, and care for community

spaces. The treehouse stood taller and stronger, a testament to their collective effort and a

beacon of pride for all to see.


Question:C

1. Literal Comprehension:

1.1. What feature of the treehouse swayed gently in the breeze?

A) The rope ladder

B) The glass windows

C) The wooden planks

D) The weather vane

1.2. What new addition was mentioned as part of the treehouse's enhancements?

A) A slide

B) A periscope

C) A swing

D) A sandbox

2. Inferential Questions:

2.1. What does the act of dividing tasks among the friends suggest about their teamwork?

A) They were organized and used a systematic approach.

B) They preferred to work individually.

C) They didn’t trust each other’s skills.

D) They were forced to work together.

2.2. How might the children have felt when they saw the completed enhancements on the

treehouse?

A) Disappointed because it was different from their expectations.

B) Indifferent as they were too tired from the work.


C) Proud and satisfied with their collective effort.

D) Confused about how to use the new additions.

3. Evaluative/Critical Questions:

3.1. Considering the community’s involvement with the treehouse over generations, how does

the treehouse contribute to the local culture?

A) It represents a historical artifact.

B) It fosters a sense of ownership and pride among the youth.

C) It serves as a commercial attraction.

D) It isolates the community from the outside world.

3.2. Evaluate the role of storytelling in the passage. How did Eli’s grandfather’s stories

influence the children's project?

A) They discouraged the children from altering the treehouse.

B) They inspired the children to maintain and enhance the treehouse.

C) They had no impact on the children’s decisions.

D) They confused the children about what needed to be done.

You might also like