Acceptance - Sampling PERT 8
Acceptance - Sampling PERT 8
Technical Note 7
Process Capability and Statistical
Quality Control
OBJECTIVES
• Process Variation
• Process Capability
• Process Control Procedures
– Variable data
– Attribute data
• Acceptance Sampling
– Operating Characteristic Curve
Incremental Incremental
Cost of Cost of
Variability Variability
Zero Zero
Process Capability
• Process limits
• Tolerance limits
As a production process
produces items small
shifts in equipment or
systems can cause
differences in
production
performance from
differing samples.
Shifts in Process Mean
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004
8
• Variable (Continuous)
– Usually measured by the mean and the standard
deviation.
– X-bar and R chart applications
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004
9
Statistical UCL
LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 Samples
over time
UCL
LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 Samples
over time
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004
10
x
m
z
-3 -2 -1 0 1 2 3
Standard
deviation
units or “z”
units.
Control Limits
We establish the Upper Control Limits (UCL)
and the Lower Control Limits (LCL) with plus
or minus 3 standard deviations from some x-bar
or mean value. Based on this we can expect
99.7% of our sample observations to fall within
these limits.
99.7%
x
LCL UCL
Given: T o ta l N u m b e r o f D e fe c tiv e s
p =
T o ta l N u m b e r o f O b s e rv a tio n s
p (1 - p )
sp =
n
Compute control limits:
UCL = p + z s p
LCL = p - z s p
55
p = = 0.036
1500
p (1 - p ) .036(1 - .036)
sp = = = .0188
n 100
UCL = p + z s p
LCL = p - z s p
.036 3(.0188)
UCL = 0.0924
LCL = -0.0204 (or 0)
0 .1 4
0 .1 2
0 .1 UCL
p 0 .0 8
0 .0 6
0 .0 4
0 .0 2
0 LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
O b s e rv a t io n
n A2 D3 D4
UCL = x + A 2 R 2 1.88 0 3.27
3 1.02 0 2.57
LC L = x - A 2 R 4 0.73 0 2.28
5 0.58 0 2.11
6 0.48 0 2.00
R C hart C ontrol L im its 7 0.42 0.08 1.92
8 0.37 0.14 1.86
UCL = D 4 R 9 0.34 0.18 1.82
10 0.31 0.22 1.78
LC L = D 3 R 11 0.29 0.26 1.74
1 0 .9 0 0
1 0 .8 5 0 UCL
1 0 .8 0 0
1 0 .7 5 0
M eans
1 0 .7 0 0
1 0 .6 5 0
1 0 .6 0 0
LCL
1 0 .5 5 0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15
S a m p le
0 .8 0 0
0 .7 0 0
0 .6 0 0
0 .5 0 0
UCL
R 0 .4 0 0
0 .3 0 0
0 .2 0 0
0 .1 0 0
0 .0 0 0
LCL
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 1 0 1 1 1 2 1 3 1 4 1 5
S a m p le
Acceptance Sampling
• Purposes
– Determine quality level
– Ensure quality is within predetermined level
• Advantages
– Economy
– Less handling damage
– Fewer inspectors
– Upgrading of the inspection job
– Applicability to destructive testing
– Entire lot rejection (motivation for improvement)
• Disadvantages
– Risks of accepting “bad” lots and rejecting
“good” lots
– Added planning and documentation
– Sample provides less information than 100-
percent inspection
Acceptance Sampling:
Single Sampling Plan
A simple goal
Risk
• Acceptable Quality Level (AQL)
– Max. acceptable percentage of defectives defined
by producer
• The a (Producer’s risk)
– The probability of rejecting a good lot
• Lot Tolerance Percent Defective (LTPD)
– Percentage of defectives that defines consumer’s
rejection point
• The (Consumer’s risk)
– The probability of accepting a bad lot
0.9
0.8 or slope of
0.7 the curve is
n = 99
0.6 c=4
dependent
0.5 on a
0.4 particular
0.3 =.10 combination
0.2 (consumer’s risk) of the four
0.1 parameters
0
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12
AQL LTPD
Percent defective
©The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc., 2004
29
Then find the value for “c” by selecting the value in the
TN7.10 “n(AQL)”column that is equal to or just greater than
the ratio above.
c = 6, from Table
n (AQL) = 3.286, from Table
AQL = .01, given in problem
Sampling Plan:
Take a random sample of 329 units from a lot.
Reject the lot if more than 6 units are defective.