Published Article
Published Article
DOI: 10.1002/pc.28336
RESEARCH ARTICLE
1
Department of Smart Manufacturing
Engineering, Changwon National Abstract
University, Changwon, Republic of Korea This study aims to investigate the mechanical properties of natural fiber hybrid
2
Department of Mechanical Engineering, composites, specifically those based on jute and bamboo fibers. Jute fibers
Changwon National University, Research
made in the form of highly scattered mesh and fine-meshed bamboo mat were
Institute of Mechatronics, Changwon,
Republic of Korea selected as reinforcing materials. The highly scattered meshed jute fabric
3
Department of Mechanical Engineering, composite showed poor mechanical properties owing to resin agglomeration,
Changwon National University, leading to the brittle fracture of the composite before elongation. In contrast,
Changwon, Republic of Korea
the randomly oriented fine-meshed bamboo fabric performed better in terms
Correspondence of both mechanical properties and strain energy absorption under the same
Jung-il Song, Changwon National
loading conditions. Hybridization with fine bamboo mesh fibers can be a
University, Department of Mechanical
Engineering, Uichang-gu, Changwon solution to improve the mechanical properties of jute fabric composites. The
51140, Gyeongsangnam-do, tensile, flexural, and in-plane shear properties of the composites are investi-
Republic of Korea.
gated in our study. We found that hybridizing a fine-meshed bamboo mat with
Email: [email protected]
jute fabric resulted in an improved mechanical performance of the composite.
Funding information Composite panels have been manufactured using vacuum assisted resin trans-
National Research Foundation of Korea,
Grant/Award Numbers:
fer molding (VARTM). Experimental and numerical methods have been used
2018R1A6A1A03024509, to investigate the flexural behavior. Of the stacking sequences considered, the
2023R1A2C1006234 (J/B4/J) stacking showed the highest flexural strength (141.1 Mpa) and
the (B2/J2/B2) 2/2 stacking sequence showed the minimum flexural strength.
The alternating stacking sequence (B/J/B/J/B/J) exhibited intermediate prop-
erties. The randomly oriented bamboo fabric near the neutral axis enhanced
the properties of the hybridized composite. This was verified numerically
using the ANSYS ACP software.
Highlights
• Mechanical behavior of Hybrid composite of two natural fibers was
investigated.
• Vacuum assisted resin transfer molding was used to manufacture composite
panels.
• Tensile, in plane shear, 3 point flexural tests and SEM micro analysis
were done.
• FEA was used to validate and compare the experimental and numerical
results.
KEYWORDS
bamboo fibers, hybrid composite, jute fibers, mechanical properties, natural fibers, vinyl
ester matrix
Different researchers have adopted different approaches VARTM setup was as follows: an aluminum plate mold
to discover eco-friendly hybrid natural fibers for various was cleaned and a releasing agent was introduced on the
engineering applications. Tran et al.21 studied the micro- surface to ease the removal of the composite. Fabric of
structural properties of a polymer matrix and evaluated the size 250 250 mm were cut and stacked layer by layer.
effect of the reinforcement size, with a particular focus on Then a peel ply was placed on top for easy removal of the
fire sensitivity. Another researcher22 studied The influence panel later on, and a resin flow net was placed to main-
of equi-biaxially fabric pre-stressing on the flexural perfor- tain a uniform distribution of resin throughout the com-
mance of woven E-glass/polyester-reinforced composites. posite. Double-sided tape was used to seal the vacuum
One notable research by23 reported impact damage detec- bags. Polyurethane pipes with a diameter of 5 mm were
tion and quantification for CFRP laminates using structural used as the inlet and outlet channels. A vacuum pump
response data only. (maintained pressure 0.01 MPa) and vinyl ester resin
The aim of this study is to propose an effective way of (density,1.03 g/cc, tensile modulus 3 to 3.3 MPa and spe-
developing a polymer matrix composites with improved the cific gravity 1.03 to 1.05 g/cc)14 in a proportion of
mechanical behavior using dual natural fibers of a relatively (VE/MEKP/CN 100:1:1) was used. A similar procedure
lower mechanical property by hybridizing with another nat- was used to manufacture hybrid composites with differ-
ural fiber that has unique property. For this purpose, a ent stacking sequences. A schematic of the VARTM setup
highly scattered meshed jute fibers was selected, which is is shown in Figure 1C for better understanding. Curing
also widely available in the market. One issue with this form was performed at room temperature.
of jute fiber, when used as a reinforcing material with a
polymer matrix, is resin agglomeration, which leads to poor
mechanical properties and brittle failure with little strain. 2.3 | Testing
To overcome this problem, hybridization with a fine-meshed
fiber (a bamboo mat in this case) was proposed. Fine- Test specimens for tensile testing with embedded
meshed bamboo mats have relatively better mechanical strain gauges, in-plane shear testing with embedded
properties and higher strain energies before failure. Finite strain gauges, and flexural tests were prepared according
element analysis (FEA) has been used by many researchers to their respective ASTM standards. Subsequently, an
to optimize the design of engineering concepts.24–26 In the experimental test was performed on a UTM-M RB301 at
present study, we used experimental and numerical a speed rate of 2 mm/min and a load cell of 2.5 ton.
approaches to validate the effectiveness of our approach. From a tensile test with a strain gauge, the orthotropic
properties of the composite, namely, Poisson's ratios (vxy, vyz,
and vxz) were evaluated. From the flexural tests, the moduli
2 | EXPERIMEN T AL ME T H OD of elasticity (Ex, Ey, and Ez) of the composites were evalu-
ated. The moduli of rigidity (Gxy, Gyz, and Gxz) were
2.1 | Materials obtained from in-plane shear tests. The flexural strengths of
both composite panels were obtained, as listed in Table 1.
Vinyl ester (VE) resin (Type: KRF-1031) viscosity: 150 cps
and specific gravity: 1.03, Tensile modulus 3–
3.3 MPa,14,27 methyl ethyl ketone peroxide (MEKP) hard- 2.4 | ANSYS ACP numerical simulation
ener, cobalt naphthalate (CN) accelerator, and Teflon
sheets are purchased from CCP composites, Korea. Bidi- In this study, we used FEA based on ANSYS ACP to eval-
rectionally meshed jute and bamboo fabrics were pur- uate and select the optimal stacking. Using the engineer-
chased from local suppliers in South Korea. ing constants obtained from the experiment, a numerical
simulation using ANSYS ACP was performed to obtain
an optimum stacking sequence with the best mechanical
2.2 | Methods properties. The numerical data of both Jute and Bamboo
fiber composites as tabulated in Table 2.
2.2.1 | Vacuum-assisted resin transfer
method
2.5 | Morphology
The vacuum-assisted resin transfer method was used to
manufacture composite laminates of bidirectional jute The morphology of the flexural fractured surfaces was
fibers and a randomly oriented bamboo mat with a vinyl observed using scanning electron microscopy (Tabletop
ester matrix, as described by Prabhakar et al.14,28 The SEM) (Model: Emcrafts Cube II, Korea) at an accelerated
4 ABRAHA GUANGUL ET AL.
F I G U R E 1 Digital and 3D microscopic images of the materials used for the study. (A) Bidirectional Jute. (B) Bamboo mat. (C)
Schematic of stacking sequences. (D) Schematic diagram of vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM).
Composite code Stacking sequence Stacking structure Jute Bamboo Matrix Result
1 [J]6 6 layers of jute 0.3 0 0.7 74.5
2 [B]6 6 layers of bamboo 0 0.3 0.7 105.8
Composite code Stacking sequence Stacking structure Jute Bamboo Simulation result
1 [J]6 6 layers of jute 1.1 — 105.65
2 [B]6 6 layers of bamboo — 0.8 130.67
voltage of 20 kV, and the samples were sputter-coated was used to compute Poisson's ratio. Poisson's ratio data
with gold using an Ion Sputter Coater G20 (GSEM, were used as the input for the simulation.
Korea) under argon flow.
A tensile test was performed using a universal testing The in-plane shear test was performed in accordance to
machine (UTM-M RB301) at a speed of 2 mm/min with a the ASTM D5379 standard test method for the shear prop-
load cell setup of 2.5 ton. The aim of the test was to erties of composite materials using V-notched beams.31
obtain the engineering constants of the Poisson's ratio of This test was performed to determine the rigidity modulus
the composites under consideration. After preparing the of the composite. For this, after preparing the V-Notched
tensile specimens according to the Standard Test Method composite beams according to the standard, strain gages
for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite were carefully installed at ±45 to each other. The in-plane
Materials1 ASTM D3039,29 strain gauges were attached shear test specimen (Figure 2C) and a schematic diagram
to both the pure bidirectional jute and bamboo composite of the in-plane shear test setup are shown in Figure 2D.
test specimens at an angle of 90 to each other according The tests were performed using a universal testing
to the guidelines described in the standard.30 The machine (UTM-M RB301) at a speed of 2 mm/min and a
test specimens are shown in Figure 2. Table 3 lists the load cell of 2.5 kgf at room temperature. An MGCPlus data
Poisson's ratios of each composite obtained through acquisition system was used to compute the rigidity modu-
the experiments. The MGCPlus data acquisition system lus. The test results are presented in Table 4.
ABRAHA GUANGUL ET AL. 5
F I G U R E 2 Tensile test specimens after failure: (A) Jute composite and (B) Bamboo composite, (C) In-plane shear test specimens, (D)
In-plane shear test setup, (E) Flexural test setup, and (F) Flexural test specimens of the different stacking sequences.
TABLE 3 Poisson's ratio test results. of 2.5 ton at room temperature. These parameters are
evaluated using the following equations:
Jute composite Bamboo composite
3PL
Constant Value Constant Value σf ¼ ,
1 vxy 0.01 vxy 0.01
2bd2
T A B L E 5 Flexural modulus of
Jute composite Bamboo composite
elasticity and flexural strength of the
Modulus of elasticity Value (GPa) Modulus of elasticity Value (GPa) composites.
1 Ex 4.5 Ex 3
2 Ey 4.5 Ey 3
3 Ez 2 Ez 2
Flexural strength (MPa) Flexural strength (MPa)
74.5 105.8
Composite Code Stacking sequence* Stacking structure Jute Bamboo Simulation result
1 [B/J4/B] Sandwich 60 12 100.74
2 [J2/B2/J2] 2/2 fiber stacking 54.7 12 112.39
3 [J/B4/J] Sandwich 36 22 141.1
4 [B2/J2/B2] 2/2 fiber stacking 28 23 96.9
5 [B/J]3 Alternating 41 13 121.97
highly meshed bidirectional jute fabric. Generally, when imprint was very small, making the bamboo composite
a fine bamboo mat is stacked between jute fibers, an relatively stronger. From this result, we can say that the
improvement in flexural strength is observed. Interest- introduction of randomly oriented fine fibers (bamboo
ingly, when the bamboo mat was kept near the middle fibers in this case) into highly scattered meshed fibers (jute
(neutral axis) of the hybrid composite, an even better fibers in this case) can solve the problem of agglomeration,
composite strength was observed (Composite Codes 2, 3, and a composite with improved mechanical properties for
and 5). This is mainly because bamboo is much stronger intended applications can be obtained. Figure 3 shows the
than the jute fiber, as was revealed in Section 2.8, Table 6 selected simulation results for different stacking
and hence, the bamboo mat positively affects the hybrid sequences.
composite. In addition, the mechanical properties of The ANSYS ACP simulation helps us decide which
bamboo mats were found to be better than those of jute stacking sequence is optimal for our requirements with
fiber composites, as discussed by Razdan et al. in their minimum cost and time. From the simulation results, it
study on the tensile properties of the two composites.33 can be observed that the stacking sequence [J/B4/J] was
In contrast, when the jute fiber was kept near the neutral optimal. After analyzing the simulation results, the next
axis of (Composite codes 1 and 4), the hybrid composite stage was to manufacture the composite structure that
showed a relatively lower flexural strength, even though best suited our requirements, that is, the maximum flex-
similar thicknesses were maintained. The main reason ural strength in this case. The experimental result also
for the lower mechanical strength of the jute fiber was revealed that the best stacking sequence in terms of flex-
resin agglomeration between the highly scattered meshes ural strength was the stacking sequence [J/B4/J], which
of the jute fabric used in this study.34,35 This leads to a agree with the simulation result.
jute fabric composite structure that fails in a brittle man-
ner following matrix cracking. This was also revealed by
analyzing the SEM image in Section 3.2.2. (SEM images 3.2 | Experimental results and
of jute and bamboo and their hybrid composite fracture discussion
surfaces), where it was clearly observed that the presence
of bamboo fibers affected the modes of fracture in both 3.2.1 | Flexural properties
composites completely differently. A large void was left
owing to fiber pullout (a), and from this point, matrix Once the numerical solution for the different stacking
cracking was initiated, leading to composite fracture. In sequences is obtained, the results are analyzed, and the
contrast, in the bamboo composite fibers, the pullout best stacking sequence in relation to the flexural properties
ABRAHA GUANGUL ET AL. 7
FIGURE 3 (A) [B6], (B) [J6], (C) [B2/J2/B2], (D) [J/B4/J], (E) [B/J4/B], (F) [J2/B2/J2], and (G) [B/J/B/J/B/J].
FIGURE 4 Flexural stress–strain curves of the Jute, Bamboo and Hybrid composites.
is selected. The VARTM method was used to manufacture modes of failure. The jute composite was superior in
the test specimens. The flexural test samples were pre- terms of bending stiffness. In contrast, the bamboo com-
pared and tested according to ASTM D 790–03. posite showed superior elasticity property before failure,
Flexural tests revealed that the bamboo and jute com- that is, it showed more strain-energy-absorbing capabil-
posites behaved differently, which makes it more inter- ity. In general, thermosetting polymer matrix composites
esting to study the hybridization of the two. As can be exhibit brittle failure modes, mainly because of the pres-
seen from the flexural stress–strain curves in Figure 4, ence of matrix elements.36–38 In our case, the highly
the pure composites exhibited unique characteristic scattered meshed nature of the jute fiber composite was
8 ABRAHA GUANGUL ET AL.
F I G U R E 5 SEM images of flexural selected fracture surfaces: (A) Jute, (B) Bamboo, (C) [J2/B2/J2], (D) [J/B4/J], (E) [J2/B2/J2], (F) [B2/J2/
B2], and (G) [B/J/B/J/B/J].
susceptible to the formation of resin pockets, referred to failure was accompanied by the stretching of the fiber com-
as resin agglomeration. This excessive resin agglomeration ponents, followed by matrix cracking, and finally, compos-
is the main reason for the poor mechanical performance ite fracture. The behavior observed in the pure composites
of the jute composite, leading to premature failure of the was clearly reflected in the hybrid composites of the two,
jute composite before absorbing sufficient strain energy. affecting their flexural properties Figure 5C,D,E,F,G. Fiber
The potential for resin agglomeration, viscosity accumula- pull-out occurred in the jute fiber-dominated composite
tion, inadequate fiber polymer wetting, and poor disper- structure, leading to lower flexural strengths (a) and (d).
sion within the matrix results in brittle characteristics, as However, in the bamboo mat-dominated regions of the
discussed by Prabhuram et al.34 By contrast, the fine-mesh composite, even though fiber pull-out was inevitable, the
bamboo mat composite possesses a higher strain energy pull-out occurred slowly compared to the jute fibers (b), (e),
before failure. According to Zhao et al.,35 the matrix-fiber and (f). This is mainly due to the fiber pull-out in the bam-
interfacial interaction is better in finer fibers than in fibers boo composite occurring after elastic elongation, unlike the
of larger diameter. Therefore, the hybrid composite of jute fiber, which fails owing to its brittle nature. This was
these two fibers will be obviously a composite that com- also observed in the flexural stress–strain curves of the indi-
bined the best properties of the two constituent elements. vidual composites, shown in Figure 4, where the bamboo
The flexural stress–strain curves of the different stacking fibers exhibited a higher strain to failure. Resin agglomera-
sequences of the bamboo/jute hybrid composites are tion is another phenomenon observed in the meshed jute
shown in Figure 4. The effects of the two constituents were fiber composite (d). With regard to the resin impregnation
clearly observed in each of these hybrid composites. property, the bamboo mat showed a much better perfor-
mance than the jute fiber (g). This is why the bamboo com-
posite showed better flexural strength than the jute fiber
3.2.2 | Fracture morphology results composite.39 Matrix cracking was more severe in the
meshed jute fiber composite (d) than in the fine-meshed
After performing the flexural tests, scanning electron bamboo mat composite (b). This is further evidence of why
microscopy (SEM) images were obtained and the failure the bamboo mat performs much better than the jute fabric
modes were analyzed. Figure 5 shows SEM images of the in terms of flexural strength.
fracture surfaces of different stacking sequences. As shown
in Figure 5A, the pure jute composite was more susceptible
to resin agglomeration, fiber pullout, and fiber fracture. 3.2.3 | Comparison of Numerical and
Figure 5B shows the fracture surface of the pure bamboo Experimental Results
composite, where it can be clearly seen that the problems of
resin agglomeration and fiber pullout are relatively low The numerical and experimental comparison results
owing to the fine-meshed fibers. In this case, the mode of for all the composites investigated in this study are
ABRAHA GUANGUL ET AL. 9
summarized in Figure 6. Whether it was a sandwich overall mechanical performance. The effectiveness of this
stacking sequence, 2/2 stacking, or alternating stacking, method was confirmed through experimental tests and
the presence of the randomly oriented nonwoven bam- numerical simulations using ANSYS ACP. The mechani-
boo mat between the bidirectional woven jute fabric cal properties of the laminated composite materials were
resulted in an improved flexural strength. This is because investigated numerically using ANSYS ACP. For exam-
the resin impregnation property was improved by the ple, Noman et al.40 investigated the mechanical strength
presence of the bamboo mat, thereby improving the of laminated composite carbon fiber with different orien-
interfacial bonding between the fibers and the matrix. tations. They explained the effects of different stacking
Owing to their smaller size, fine-meshed fibers tend to sequences on the mechanical properties of the compos-
have a larger surface-area-to-volume ratio than highly ites. Therefore, the limitations of the mechanical proper-
meshed fibers. This increased surface-area-to-volume ties of the most abundantly available natural fiber, jute,
ratio can facilitate better interfacial bonding with the in the region can be improved by introducing a nonwo-
matrix material, leading to improved load transfer and ven bamboo mat so that it can be used for certain struc-
tural applications, such as furniture, construction, and
interior parts of automobiles and aerospace vehicles.
Similar trends were observed in the experimental and
numerical results (Figure 6). When the bamboo mat was
set near the neutral axis of the composite, an improved
flexural performance was observed. This was demon-
strated both numerically and experimentally.
F I G U R E 7 (A) Comparison of flexural stiffness of Jute, Bamboo, and hybrid composites with existing engineering materials and (B)
Flexural test data of Jute, Bamboo, and Hybrid composites.
10 ABRAHA GUANGUL ET AL.
resource for lightweight composites. Ind Crops Products. 2023; 29. Materials, A. C. D. O. C. Standard test method for tensile prop-
192:116099. erties of polymer matrix composite materials, ASTM Interna-
14. Prabhakar M, Kumar CN, Woo LD, Jung-IL S. Hybrid tional. 2008.
approach to improve the flame-retardant and thermal proper- 30. De Baere I, Van Paepegem W, Quaresimin M, Degrieck J. On
ties of sustainable biocomposites used in outdoor engineering the tension–tension fatigue behaviour of a carbon reinforced
applications. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2022;152:106674. thermoplastic part I: limitations of the ASTM D3039/D3479
15. Verma A, Jain N, Parashar A, Gaur A, Sanjay MR, Siengchin S. standard. Polym Test. 2011;30(6):625-632.
Lifecycle assessment of thermoplastic and thermosetting bam- 31. Liu G, Zhang L, Guo L, Wang Q, Liao F. A modified V-notched
boo composites. In: Jawaid M, Mavinkere Rangappa S, Sieng- beam test method for interlaminar shear behavior of 3D woven
chin S, eds. Bamboo Fiber Composites. Composites Science and composites. Compos Struct. 2017;181:46-57.
Technology. Springer; 2021;235-246. doi:10.1007/978-981-15- 32. Widodo R, Robi W, Nugroho A, Al-Janan D. The effect of
8489-3_13 orientation fibres on flexural and tensile properties of Arenga
16. Fragassa C. Lightening structures by metal replacement: from Pinnata fibres reinforced polyester composites. IOP Conference
traditional gym equipment to an advanced fiber-reinforced Series: Materials Science and Engineering. Vol 807. IOP Publish-
composite exoskeleton. FACTA Univ Series: Mech Eng. 2021; ing; 2020:012031.
19(2):155-174. 33. Razdan S, Marathe DS. Uniaxial tensile properties for bamboo
17. Corke TC. Design of Aircraft. Prentice Hall; 2003. and jute fabric reinforced natural rubber. Mater Today: Proc.
18. Kurien RA, Anil MM, Mohan SS, Thomas JA. Natural fiber 2023;80:591-596.
composites as sustainable resources for emerging applications-a 34. Prabhuram T, Singh SP, Raja DE, Durairaj JI, Das MC,
review. Mater Today: Proc. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023. Ravichandran P. Development and mechanical characterization of
04.363 jute fibre and multi-walled carbon nanotube-reinforced unsatu-
19. Mohan R, Vijay R. Effect of stacking sequence on tribological rated polyester resin composite. Mater Today: Proc. 2023. doi:10.
properties of bamboo/jute reinforced hybrid epoxy polymer 1016/j.matpr.2023.08.302
composites. Mater Today: Proc. 2021;39:1-5. 35. Zhao X, Zhang Z, Pang J, Su L. Preparation of carbon fibre-
20. Sekhar VC, Dasore A, Yalamasetti B, Madhuri KS, Narendar G. reinforced composite panels from epoxy resin matrix of nano
Flexural behavior of natural fiber epoxy composites. Mater lignin polyol particles. J Clean Prod. 2023;428:139170.
Today: Proc. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.03.429 36. Arash B, Wang Q, Varadan V. Mechanical properties of carbon
21. Mai Nguyen Tran T, Prabakar MN, Lee D-W, Song J. Effect nanotube/polymer composites. Sci Rep. 2014;4(1):6479.
of hybrid eco-friendly reinforcement and their size on 37. Ma Y, Yang Y, Sugahara T, Hamada H. A study on the failure
mechanical and flame retardant properties of polypropylene behavior and mechanical properties of unidirectional fiber
composites for technical applications. Polym Compos. 2024; reinforced thermosetting and thermoplastic composites. Com-
45(3):2427-2443. pos Part B Eng. 2016;99:162-172.
22. Mostafa NH, Ismarrubie Z, Sapuan S, Sultan M. The influence 38. Mahmud S, Das S, Mollah M, et al. Thermoset-polymer matrix
of equi-biaxially fabric prestressing on the flexural performance composite materials of jute and glass fibre reinforcements: radia-
of woven E-glass/polyester-reinforced composites. J Compos tion effects determination. J Mater Res Technol. 2023;26:6623-6635.
Mater. 2016;50(24):3385-3393. 39. Liu H, Zhou J, Kong X, Li S. Fracture behaviour of fibre-
23. Sultan M, Worden K, Pierce S, et al. On impact damage detection reinforced composite materials subjected to shear loading: an
and quantification for CFRP laminates using structural response experimental and numerical study. Int J Lightweight Mater
data only. Mech Syst Signal Process. 2011;25(8):3135-3152. Manuf. 2023;6(1):108-116.
24. Hilo AK, Iborra AA, Sultan MTH, Hamid MFA. Effect of corru- 40. Noman AA, Shohel SM, Riyad SH, Gupta SS. Investigate the
gated wall combined with backward-facing step channel on mechanical strength of laminated composite carbon fiber with dif-
fluid flow and heat transfer. Energy. 2020;190:116294. ferent fiber orientations by numerically using finite element anal-
25. Pushpa N, Gowda CV, Aprameya C, et al. Characterization of ysis. Mater Today: Proc. 2023. doi:10.1016/j.matpr.2023.02.132
polymer matrix with tectona grandis and tamarind natural 41. Sahoo CK, Bhatia GS, Arockiarajan A. Effect of patch-parent
fiber hybrid composite. Mater Today: Proc. 2023. doi:10.1016/j. stacking sequence and patch stiffness on the tensile behaviour
matpr.2023.09.144 of the patch repaired carbon-glass hybrid composite. Thin-
26. Sharanabasava H, Prasad CD, Ramesh M. Effect of Mo-and Walled Struct. 2022;179:109551.
SiC-reinforced NiCr microwave cladding on microstructure,
mechanical and Wear properties. J Instit Eng (India): Series D.
2023;104:539-551.
How to cite this article: Abraha Guangul H,
27. Yu R, Prabhakar M, Song J-i. Effect of extracted nano-cellulose
Prabhakar MN, Lee DW, Song J. Development of
from paper egg trays on mechanical properties of vinyl ester/kenaf
fibers composites. J Polym Environ. 2022;30(12):5313-5326. hybrid green composites by dual natural fibers
(jute/bamboo) reinforcement and investigation of
28. Kim J-H, Shin P-S, Kwon D-J, DeVries KL, Park J-M. Evaluation
of interfacial, dispersion, and thermal properties of carbon their mechanical behavior. Polym Compos. 2024;
fiber/ABC added epoxy composites manufactured by VARTM 1‐11. doi:10.1002/pc.28336
and RFI methods. Compos A: Appl Sci Manuf. 2021;151:106660.