UNIT - 3

1] 2 -D MESH SIMD MODEL

The 2-D mesh SIMD (Single Instruction, Multiple Data) model is a parallel computing architecture
commonly used for data-parallel computations on regular grids, such as image processing, matrix
operations, and stencil computations. In this model, multiple processing elements (PEs) are arranged in a
2-D grid, and each PE executes the same instruction simultaneously but operates on different data
elements.

Diagram of 2-D Mesh SIMD Model

+------+------+------+------+------+

| PE(0,0)| PE(1,0)| PE(2,0)| PE(3,0)|

+-----------------------------------+

| PE(0,1)| PE(1,1)| PE(2,1)| PE(3,1)|

+-----------------------------------+

| PE(0,2)| PE(1,2)| PE(2,2)| PE(3,2)|

+-----------------------------------+

| PE(0,3)| PE(1,3)| PE(2,3)| PE(3,3)|

+-----------------------------------+

In this diagram:

1. Each square represents a processing element (PE).

2. PEs are organized in a 2-D grid, forming a mesh.

3. The arrows indicate possible communication paths between neighboring PEs (e.g., for exchanging
data).

Example Algorithm: Matrix Addition

Let's consider a simple algorithm for parallel matrix addition using the 2-D mesh SIMD model:

Problem: Given two matrices A and B of size N×N, compute the matrix sum C = A + B in parallel using the
2-D mesh SIMD model.

Algorithm:

Each PE (i, j) reads one element from matrices A and B, denoted as A(i, j) and B(i, j), respectively.

Each PE computes the sum of the corresponding elements: C(i, j) = A(i, j) + B(i, j).

PEs exchange data with neighboring PEs to ensure correct computation along the edges of the mesh.

The result matrix C is obtained by aggregating the partial sums computed by each PE.

Pseudocode:

for i = 0 to N-1 do

for j = 0 to N-1 do

C(i, j) = A(i, j) + B(i, j)

Parallelization:

Each PE executes the inner loop independently, computing the sum for one element of the result matrix.

The outer loop can be parallelized across rows or columns of the matrix, with each row or column
assigned to a different group of PEs.

Synchronization may be required to ensure correct computation along the edges of the mesh, such as
exchanging boundary values between neighboring PEs.

Performance:

The algorithm achieves O(N^2) time complexity, similar to the sequential version.

The speedup depends on factors such as the number of PEs, communication overhead, and load
balancing.

This example illustrates how the 2-D mesh SIMD model can be used to parallelize computations on
regular grids, achieving high throughput and efficiency through data parallelism.

Neighborhood Communication:
PEs in the mesh communicate with their immediate neighbors to exchange data required for
computations.

Communication patterns can vary based on the algorithm, but common approaches include
nearest-neighbor communication or communication along rows and columns.

Load Balancing:

Achieving balanced work distribution among PEs is essential for optimal performance.

Irregularities in the data or computation may require load balancing techniques to ensure that all PEs
contribute equally to the workload.

Boundary Handling:

Handling boundary conditions in the mesh can be challenging, as PEs at the edges have fewer neighbors.

Various strategies, such as ghost cells or padding, can be used to address boundary issues and ensure
correct computation.

Scalability:

The 2-D mesh SIMD model scales well for problems with regular structures, as the number of PEs
increases.

However, scalability may be limited by factors such as communication overhead, synchronization

requirements, and memory constraints.

Fault Tolerance:

Fault tolerance mechanisms are essential for robustness in large-scale systems.

Redundancy, checkpointing, and error detection/correction techniques can help mitigate the impact of
hardware failures on computation.

Algorithmic Variations:

The 2-D mesh SIMD model can be adapted to various parallel algorithms beyond simple matrix
operations.

Examples include image processing filters, stencil computations, cellular automata simulations, and finite
difference methods.

Hybrid Models:

Hybrid parallel models combining SIMD with other parallel paradigms, such as MPI for distributed
memory systems or OpenMP for shared memory systems, are common.

Hybrid approaches leverage the strengths of different parallel models to achieve better performance and
scalability.

Memory Hierarchy:

Efficient utilization of memory hierarchy (e.g., caches, shared memory) is crucial for optimizing
performance.

Data locality and access patterns should be considered to minimize memory access latency and maximize
throughput.

Programming Challenges:

Programming for the 2-D mesh SIMD model requires careful consideration of data distribution,
communication, and synchronization.

High-level parallel programming languages and libraries, such as CUDA, OpenCL, and MPI, provide
abstractions and tools to simplify parallel programming on such architectures.

Performance Optimization:

Performance tuning techniques, such as loop unrolling, data prefetching, and vectorization, can be
applied to improve the efficiency of computations on SIMD architectures.

Profiling and analysis tools help identify bottlenecks and optimize critical sections of the algorithm.

These points highlight various aspects of utilizing the 2-D mesh SIMD model in parallel algorithms,
emphasizing its versatility, scalability, and potential challenges in achieving high-performance parallel
computation.

2] PARALLEL ALGORITHMS FOR REDUCTION

Reduction is a common operation in parallel computing where a collection of values is aggregated into a
single value through a binary associative operation, such as addition, multiplication, or finding the
maximum/minimum. Parallel reduction algorithms aim to efficiently compute the reduction result using
multiple processors or threads. Here are some parallel algorithms for reduction:

Tree-based Reduction:

In this approach, the reduction operation is performed hierarchically in a binary tree

structure.

Initially, each processor or thread computes local reductions on subsets of the input data.

Then, the results are combined pairwise up the tree until a single result is obtained at the root.

Common variations include binary tree, balanced tree, and skewed tree reduction.

Scan-Based Reduction:
Scan-based algorithms compute prefix sums or cumulative operations, which can be used to perform
reduction.

The input data is partitioned into segments, and each segment's reduction result is computed
independently.

Then, prefix sums of the segment results are computed to propagate partial results through the tree
structure.

Finally, the global reduction result is obtained by combining the segment results with the prefix sums.

Parallel Prefix Sum:

Parallel prefix sum algorithms compute the cumulative sum of elements in an array efficiently.

These algorithms can be adapted for reduction by performing the reduction operation in conjunction
with the prefix sum computation.

By carefully choosing the binary associative operation, parallel prefix sum algorithms can be used for
various reduction tasks.

Bitwise Reduction:

Bitwise reduction algorithms are used for reduction operations on Boolean or bit-wise data types.

These algorithms exploit bitwise operations (e.g., bitwise AND, OR, XOR) to combine values in parallel.

Bitwise reduction can be efficiently implemented using parallel hardware instructions or specialized
parallel algorithms.

Parallel Sorting-Based Reduction:

Reduction can be performed using parallel sorting algorithms, such as parallel merge sort or parallel
quicksort.

After sorting the input data, the reduction operation can be applied by combining adjacent sorted
elements in parallel.

Distributed Reduction:

In distributed computing environments, reduction can be performed across multiple nodes or processors
using message passing or distributed memory models.

Algorithms such as scatter-reduce or gather-reduce distribute the input data to different nodes, perform
local reductions, and then combine the partial results to obtain the global reduction result.

Hybrid Reduction:

Hybrid reduction algorithms combine multiple parallelization techniques, such as tree-based,

scan-based, and sorting-based approaches, to optimize performance.

These algorithms leverage the strengths of different parallelization strategies to achieve efficient
reduction across various hardware architectures.

Optimization Techniques:

Various optimization techniques, such as load balancing, data partitioning, and cache-aware algorithms,
can be applied to improve the performance of parallel reduction algorithms.

Specialized hardware features, such as vectorization, multi-threading, and GPU acceleration, can also be
utilized to enhance the efficiency of reduction operations.

These parallel algorithms for reduction are essential building blocks in many parallel applications,
including numerical simulations, data processing, and scientific computing. The choice of algorithm
depends on factors such as the size of the input data, the characteristics of the reduction operation, the
hardware architecture, and the desired performance goals.

Let's consider a simple example of parallel reduction using a tree-based algorithm. Suppose we want to
compute the sum of an array of numbers in parallel. We'll use a binary tree structure to perform the
reduction.

Example: Parallel Sum Reduction

Input: Array of numbers A = [3, 7, 1, 5, 2, 4, 6, 8]

Algorithm:

Partition the input array into segments, with each segment assigned to a processor or thread.

Each processor computes the local sum of its assigned segment.

Perform a binary tree reduction to combine the local sums and compute the global sum.

Diagram:

Global Sum

/\

/ \

/ \

/ \

/ \
 / \

/ \

/ \

/ \

/ \

/ \

/ \

P0 P1

+ +

/\ /\

/ \ / \

3 7 1 5

In this example:

The input array [3, 7, 1, 5, 2, 4, 6, 8] is partitioned into two segments, each assigned to a processor (P0
and P1).

Each processor computes the local sum of its segment:

Local Sum P0 = 3 + 7 = 10 and Local Sum P1 = 1 + 5 = 6.

Processors combine their local sums pairwise up the tree until a single global sum is obtained at the root.

Execution:

Initially, each processor computes its local sum independently.

The local sums (10 and 6) are combined at the next level of the tree: 10 + 6 = 16.

Finally, the global sum 16 is obtained at the root of the tree.

This diagram illustrates how a binary tree-based reduction algorithm can efficiently compute the sum of
an array in parallel. Each level of the tree represents a stage of the reduction, with processors combining
their partial results until the final result is obtained at the root of the tree.

3] ODD EVEN MERGE SORTING

Odd-even merge sort is a parallel sorting algorithm based on the merge sort algorithm. It utilizes the
parallelism inherent in the odd-even transposition sorting network to sort elements in parallel. Here's
how the odd-even merge sort algorithm works along with a description and a diagram:

Odd-Even Merge Sort Algorithm

Partitioning Phase:

Divide the input array into equal-sized segments, each assigned to a processor or thread.

Each processor sorts its segment independently using a sequential or parallel sorting algorithm.

Odd-Even Merge Phase:

Perform a series of odd-even merge operations to merge adjacent segments and produce sorted
subarrays.

In each iteration:

Odd-even comparisons are performed between elements at corresponding positions in adjacent

segments.

Elements are exchanged if they are out of order to ensure that each pair of adjacent segments is sorted.

Global Merge Phase:

Merge adjacent sorted subarrays produced in the odd-even merge phase to obtain the final sorted array.

This phase can be implemented using a parallel merging algorithm, such as parallel merge sort or parallel
merge tree.

Diagram of Odd-Even Merge Sort

Consider an example of sorting an array of numbers [5, 2, 8, 3, 1, 7, 6, 4] using odd-even merge sort.

Initial Array: [5, 2, 8, 3, 1, 7, 6, 4]

Partitioning Phase:

-----------------------------------------

Processor 1: [5, 2, 8, 3]

Processor 2: [1, 7, 6, 4]

Odd-Even Merge Phase:

-----------------------------------------

Iteration 1: Odd-Even Comparisons

Processor 1: [2, 3, 5, 8]
Processor 2: [1, 4, 6, 7]

Iteration 2: Odd-Even Comparisons

Processor 1: [1, 2, 3, 4]

Processor 2: [5, 6, 7, 8]

Global Merge Phase:

-----------------------------------------

Final Sorted Array: [1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8]

In this example:

Initially, the array is partitioned into two segments, [5, 2, 8, 3] and [1, 7, 6, 4], assigned to two
processors.

Each processor sorts its segment independently.

During the odd-even merge phase, odd-even comparisons are performed between adjacent segments to
merge and sort them.

After two iterations, all adjacent segments are merged and sorted.

Finally, a global merge phase merges the sorted segments to produce the final sorted array [1, 2, 3, 4, 5,
6, 7, 8].

Parallelism and Efficiency

Odd-even merge sort exhibits parallelism at multiple levels, including segment sorting, odd-even
comparisons, and global merging.

The algorithm has good scalability and can efficiently utilize multiple processors or threads.

However, the performance of odd-even merge sort depends on factors such as load balancing,
communication overhead, and the efficiency of the underlying sorting and merging algorithms.

Work Distribution: In parallel odd-even merge sort, the work is distributed among multiple processors or
threads to exploit parallelism. Each processor typically handles a subset of the data, with communication
between processors to perform merging.

Load Balancing: Ensuring load balance is crucial for efficient parallel odd-even merge sort. Load
imbalance can occur when the workload is not evenly distributed among processors, leading to some
processors finishing their tasks much earlier than others. Load balancing techniques like dynamic
workload distribution or workload stealing can be employed to mitigate this issue.

Communication Overhead: Parallel odd-even merge sort involves communication between processors
during the merging phase. Minimizing communication overhead is important for performance.
Techniques such as efficient message passing or shared memory can be used to reduce communication
costs.

Parallelization Strategies: Various parallelization strategies can be employed in odd-even merge sort,
including task parallelism and data parallelism. Task parallelism involves assigning different processors to
perform different tasks, such as sorting or merging, while data parallelism involves dividing the data into
chunks and assigning each processor to work on a subset of the data.

Scalability: Scalability refers to the ability of the parallel odd-even merge sort algorithm to efficiently
utilize additional resources as the problem size or the number of processors increases. Designing
algorithms that scale well with increasing problem size or processor count is essential for handling large
datasets efficiently.

Cache Efficiency: Cache efficiency is another important consideration in parallel odd-even merge sort.
Minimizing cache misses and optimizing memory access patterns can significantly improve performance.
Techniques such as data locality optimization and cache-conscious algorithms can be employed to
enhance cache efficiency.

Fault Tolerance: In distributed computing environments, fault tolerance becomes crucial. Parallel
odd-even merge sort algorithms should be designed to handle failures gracefully, ensuring that the
computation can continue even if some processors fail. Techniques such as checkpointing and
redundancy can be used to achieve fault tolerance.

Synchronization Overhead: Synchronization between parallel processes or threads can introduce

overhead, impacting performance. Minimizing synchronization overhead by using lock-free or wait-free
algorithms can improve scalability and performance in parallel odd-even merge sort.

Hybrid Approaches: Hybrid approaches combining parallel odd-even merge sort with other
parallelization techniques, such as multi-threading and vectorization, can further enhance performance
on modern multi-core CPUs and accelerators like GPUs.

Algorithmic Optimizations: Various algorithmic optimizations can be applied to parallel odd-even merge
sort to improve its efficiency, such as reducing the number of comparisons during merging, optimizing
the merging phase, and exploiting properties of the data to minimize operations.