0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views7 pages

PCE Process

Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
Download as pdf or txt
You are on page 1/ 7

IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science

PAPER • OPEN ACCESS You may also like


- Study on Synthesis and Properties of Vinyl
Process design and optimization of VPEG-PCEs Polyoxyethylene Ether Type
Polycarboxylate Superplasticizer
Zhuojun Jiang, Yunhui Fang, Yuanqiang
To cite this article: Youzhe Shao et al 2019 IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci. 358 032014 Guo et al.

- Study on Synthesis and Properties of


Highly Adaptable Polycarboxylate
Superplasticizer
Lina Zhong, Yunhui Fang, Yuliang Ke et
View the article online for updates and enhancements. al.

- Effect of different synthesis temperature


on the bleeding performance of
polycarboxylate superplasticizer
Qiumin Xiong, Guangxing Lai, Wei Dang
et al.

This content was downloaded from IP address 59.152.58.84 on 24/07/2023 at 08:36


AEECE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 358 (2019) 032014 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/358/3/032014

Process design and optimization of VPEG-PCEs

Youzhe Shao, Guangxing Lai, Yunhui Fang and Yuanqiang Guo


KZJ New Materials Group Co., Ltd., Xiamen, Fujian, 361101, China
E-mail: [email protected]

Abstract. The VPEG type polycarboxylate superplasticizer (PCE-A) was synthesized by using
4-hydroxybutylvinyl polyoxyethylene ether (VPEG) as macromonomer, hydrogen peroxide
(H2O2)\reducing agent (sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylateas) as redox system, and thioglycolic
acid as the chain transfer agent. The effects of synthesis temperature, acid-ether ratio and
reaction time on the dispersion properties of polycarboxylate superplasticizer were investigated
experimentally, and the results showed that the optimal preparation process of PCE-A is n(AA):
n(VPEG-4000)=4.4:1, hydrogen peroxide, formaldehyde sodium hydrogen sulfite and
thioglycolic acid respectively account for the total mass of VPEG monomer 0.75%, 0.2%, and
0.4%, the optimum synthesis temperature, dripping time, and constant temperature reaction
time were 14 ℃, 60 min, and 60 min, respectively. The concrete results showed that the
dispersibility and slump retention performance of PCE-A were better than the commercially
available VPEG type polycarboxylate superplasticizer PCE-W01, PCE-W02 and PCE-W03.

1. Introduction
4-hydroxybutyl vinyl polyoxyethylene ether (VPEG), a new macromonomer to synthesize
polycarboxylate water reducing agent, exhibits superior polymerization activity compared with allyl
alcohol polyoxyethylene ether (APEG), prenyl alcohol polyoxyethylene ether (TPEG), methacrylic
polyoxyethylene ether (HPEG) [1-4]. Munich University of Technology in Germany studied the
sensitivity of VPEG type PCE to clay components, and some related researches also have been done
by domestic researchers, for example Zeng Jun investigated the synthesis technology of the VPEG
type PCE and the result showed that the water-reducing agent has excellent concrete work
performance[5]. Lai Huazhen et al. used VPEG to prepare a PCE which is insensitive to the dosage,
cement raw materials and temperature[6]. At present, there are more and more manufacturers in China
launch VPEG type PCE, indicating that VPEG monomer and its PCE have gradually revealed its
excellent features, with broad development prospects and huge market space.
In this paper, we came up with a new type of Carboxylic acid water reducing agent PCE-A, which
used hydrogen peroxide/reducing agent to form a redox initiation system to initiate polymerization, 4-
hydroxybutyl vinyl polyoxyethylene ether (VPEG) as macromonomer and thioglycolic acid as the
chain transfer agent. Through the single factor adjustment of PCE-A process, the effects of synthesis
temperature, acid-ether ratio, injection time and constant temperature on the performance of VPEG-
type PCE were discussed. This study has certain guiding significance for the development of VPEG-
type polycarboxylate superplasticizer.

2. Experimental

2.1. Materials

Content from this work may be used under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 licence. Any further distribution
of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the title of the work, journal citation and DOI.
Published under licence by IOP Publishing Ltd 1
AEECE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 358 (2019) 032014 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/358/3/032014

The raw materials used in the synthesis of this experiment include: 4-hydroxybutyl vinyl ethoxylate
(VPEG, domestic, molecular weight 4000), acrylic acid (AA), hydrogen peroxide, thioglycolic acid,
32% sodium hydroxide, formaldehyde sulfuric acid Sodium hydrogen is commercially available in
industrial grade.

2.2. Synthesis
Hydrogen peroxide (H2O2), water, acrylic acid (AA) and VPEG monomer were placed to the four-
necked flask equipped with a stirrer. With setting the temperature of the water bath to between 4-30℃,
keep stirring until the temperature of the four-necked flask solution reaches the set temperature. Then
through the peristaltic pump feeding device, the solution A,B,C were fed dropwise as follows. The
solution A (the mass ratio of AA to VPEG is 5%) was prepared by acrylic acid, sodium hydroxide and
water. The solution B was prepared by reducing agent sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate and water,
and the solution C was prepared from thioglycolic acid and water. After the dropwise addition, it need
to be kept at a constant temperature for 45 minutes, and the pH was adjusted to 6-7 by adding base
liquid .Therefore, we can obtain a VPEG type polycarboxylate superplasticizer with solid content of
40%.

2.3. Performance test method

2.3.1. Cement paste fluidity test. According to GB/T 8077-2012 "Methods for testing uniformity of
concrete admixture", the amount of cement was kept at 300 g and the water-cement ratio was 0.29.

2.3.2. Concrete performance test. The concrete performance was tested according to GB/T 50081-
2002 "Standard for testmethod of mechanical Properties on ordinary concrete" and GB/T50080-2016
"Standard for test method of perfonl l ance on ordinary fresh concrete".

2.3.3. GPC analysis. Molecular weight was performed by gel permeation chromatography (GPC)
using Ultrahydrogel Liner Column and Ultrahydrogel 120 Column made by Waters. The elution
solvent used was 0.1 M of NaNO3 aqueous solution.

3. Experimental results and discussion

3.1. Effect of synthesis temperature on performance of PCE


The total molar mass ratio of AA to VPEG was maintained at 4.8:1, and the mass of hydrogen
peroxide, sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate and thioglycolic acid were 0.75%, 0.2% and 0.4%,
respectively, of the total mass of the VPEG monomer. Testing the performance of the polycarboxylate
superplasticizer synthesized at a temperatures of 4 ℃ to 30 ℃, the results is shown in figure 1.

Figure 1. Performance of water reducing agent at different synthesis temperatures

2
AEECE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 358 (2019) 032014 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/358/3/032014

As can be seen from figure 1, when the temperature is lowered by 2 ℃ under high temperature, the
cement paste fluidity is increased by about 9 mm. The fluidity of the cement paste increases with the
decrease of the synthesis temperature, but when the temperature is too low, the increase rate of fluidity
of the cement paste is significantly reduced. In addition, the performance of the polycarboxylate
superplasticizer synthesized at low temperature is significantly better than the high temperature
condition, because VPEG macromonomer is unstable at high temperature, easy to decompose,
resulting in long side chain in the PCE structure shortening and the steric hindrance of the PCE
structure becomes smaller. However, when the temperature is too low, the chain initiation rate is
affected, resulting in a slower polymerization rate. Considering both cost and effect, it is preferred to
select a polymerization temperature of 14 ℃ to 16 ℃.

3.2. Effect of acid ether ratio on performance of PCE


The synthesis temperature was kept at 14 ℃, the mass of hydrogen peroxide, sodium formaldehyde
sulfoxylate and thioglycolic acid were 0.75%, 0.2% and 0.4%, respectively, of the total mass of the
VPEG monomer. Adjust the molar mass ratio of AA to VPEG to 5.2, 4.8, 4.4, 4.0, 3.6, 3.2, 2.8,
respectively and the effect of different molar mass ratios on the performance of cement paste was
studied. The results are shown in figure 2.

Figure 2. Performance of water reducing agent with different acid-ether ratio


It can be seen from figure 2 that as the ratio of acid to ether increases, the pulp fluidity of the
synthesized PCE increased first and then decreased slightly. When the ratio of acid to ether is 4.4, the
fluidity of the cement paste reaches a maximum of 238 mm. This is because when the ratio of acid
ether is too low, the carboxylic acid in the PCE structure is low, and the effective adsorption amount is
small, resulting in a small initial fluidity of the cement paste. As the ratio of acid to ether increases, the
effective adsorption amount of PCE increases, and the macroscopic performance shows an increase in
the fluidity of the cement paste. However, when the ratio of acid ether is too large, the fluidity of the
cement paste will decrease. This is because the ratio of acid ether is too large, resulting in a decrease
in the density of the long side chain, a decrease in steric hindrance, and a macroscopic decrease in the
fluidity of the cement paste. According to the performance of the cement paste under the same dosage,
the optimum acid-ether ratio is 4.4:1.

3.3. Effect of reaction time on performance of PCE


The synthesis temperature was kept at 14 ℃, the mass of hydrogen peroxide, sodium formaldehyde
sulfoxylate and thioglycolic acid were 0.75%, 0.2% and 0.4%, respectively, of the total mass of the
VPEG monomer, and the total molar mass ratio of AA and VPEG was 4.4 :1. By changing the
injection time, constant temperature reaction time, and performing gel chromatography test on the
synthesized water reducing agent samples 1~9, the monomer conversion was measured as shown in
table 1.

3
AEECE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 358 (2019) 032014 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/358/3/032014

Table 1. Effect of injection time and constant temperature on monomer conversion rate
Serial Injection time Constant temperature Total reaction time Conversion rate
number (min) time (min) (min) (%)
1 30 30 60 69.94
2 30 45 75 75.72
3 30 60 90 76.47
4 60 30 90 79.05
5 60 45 105 83.26
6 60 60 120 85.01
7 90 30 120 84.06
8 90 45 135 85.08
9 90 60 150 85.12
The effects of different injection time and constant temperature reaction time on the performance of
cement paste were tested, and the results are shown in figure 3.

Figure 3. Effect of different drop Time and constant temperature reaction Time
on the performances of cement paste
It can be seen from figure 3 that the fluidity of the water-reducing agent samples with the serial
numbers of 1, 2, 3, 7, 8, and 9 is significantly lower than that of the samples with the serial numbers of
4, 5, and 6 under the same dosage. This is because when the injection time is 30 minutes, the dripping
speed is too fast, and the total reaction time is short, resulting in low conversion of monomers and low
fluidity of cement paste. When the injection time is 90 min, the total reaction time is long and the
monomer conversion rate is large. However, due to the monomer dropping rate is too slow during the
injection stage, the side chain density of the polymer is low, which can not produce enough steric
hindrance effect. The macroscopic performance of the polymer is that the fluidity of the cement paste
is low. When the injection time is 60 min, the suitable dripping speed ensures a large side chain
density in the polycarboxylate superplasticizer structure, and sufficient reaction time makes the
monomer conversion rate higher. Comparing the samples 4, 5, and 6, it can be found that the order of
the monomer conversion rate and the cement paste fluidity of the three samples are all: sample 6 >
sample 5 > sample 4. In summary, when the injection time and the constant temperature reaction time
are both 60 min and the total reaction time is 120 min, the performance of the water reducing agent is
best, and the water reducing agent synthesized by the process is named PCE-A.

4
AEECE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 358 (2019) 032014 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/358/3/032014

3.4. Concrete performance test


Keep the experimental conditions unchanged, as shown in table 2 for concrete materials and mix ratios.
The PCE-A synthesized under the optimal process conditions was compared with the commercially
available VPEG-type polycarboxylate superplasticizer PCE-W01, PCE-W02 and PCE-W03 under the
equal-folding solid content (The solid content of both PCE-A and PCE-W03 is 40%, the solid content
of both PCE-W01 and PCE-W02 is 50%), and the experimental results are shown in figure 4 to figure
6.
Table 2. Concrete mix ratio
Material
C S1 G1 G2 W
variety
Medium sand Gravel Gravel
Model P.O42.5(R) Tap water
(Mx=2.8) (20-40mm) (10-20mm)
Dosage
380 175 310 730 175
/kg·m-3

Figure 4. Comparison of compressive strength Figure 5. Comparison of slump flow

Figure 6. Comparison of slump


It can be seen from figure 4 that under the same experimental conditions, the 3d and 7d
compressive strength of PCE-A are higher than the commercially available VPEG type
polycarboxylate superplasticizer PCE-W01, PCE-W02 and PCE-W03. As can be seen from figure 5,
the initial expansion and 60min expansion of PCE-A are 535 mm and 390 mm, respectively, which are
larger than the other three commercially available samples. It shows that its initial dispersion is
better.As can be seen from figure 6, the slumps of PCE-A, PCE-W01, PCE-W02 and PCE-W03 were
reduced by 25 mm, 25 mm, 35 mm and 30 min, respectively, from 0 to 60 min. It shows that the slump
retention of PCE-A and PCE-W01 is better among the four samples, but the initial slump and the 60

5
AEECE 2019 IOP Publishing
IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science 358 (2019) 032014 doi:10.1088/1755-1315/358/3/032014

min slump of PCE-A are the largest. Therefore, the overall performance of PCE-A is superior to the
commercially available VPEG-type polycarboxylate superplasticizer PCE-W01, PCE-W02 and PCE-
W03.

4. Conclusion
The effects of synthesis temperature, acid-ether ratio and reaction time on the dispersion properties of
polycarboxylate superplasticizer PCE-A were investigated. This study demonstrates that the optimum
acid-ether ratio for synthetic PCE-A is n(AA): n(VPEG-4000) = 4.4:1. The ratio of hydrogen peroxide,
reducing agent sodium formaldehyde sulfoxylate and thioglycolic acid to total mass of VPEG
monomer were 0.75%, 0.2% and 0.4%, respectively. The optimum synthesis temperature, injection
time and constant temperature reaction time were 14 ℃, 60 min, and 60 min, respectively.
Under the same experiment and equal-folding conditions, the overall performance of PCE-A is
better than that of commercially available VPEG type polycarboxylate superplasticizer PCE-W01,
PCE-W02 and PCE-W03 by comparing the initial dispersion and the slump retention of concrete.

Acknowledgement
Fund: Science and Technology Plan Project of Fujian Ministry of Housing and Urban-Rural
Development (2019-K-9); Science and Technology Major Project of Zhangzhou City (ZZ2018ZD07).

References
[1] Wang, Y.M., Shi, J.M., Li, X.F. (1997) Development and Production of High-efficiency Water-
reducing Additive AF. Coal Chemical Industry, 03: 20-26.
[2] Xu, H.J., Zhu, W. (2012) Experimental research on the adaptability of modified polycarboxylate
superplasticizer with cement when applied in C30 ready-mixed concrete. New Type of
Building Materials, 39: 53-55.
[3] Zhong, L.N., (2018) Synthesis and properties of the polycarboxylate superplasticizer for clay
tolerance. New Type of Building Materials, 45: 41-44+48.
[4] Li, X.F., Ma, T.Y., Zhou, L.M., Liu, Z.B., Zhu, J.M. (2013) Research progress and prospects of
polycarboxylate superlasticizers polyether monomer. DETERGENT & COSMETICS, 36:
21-23.
[5] Zeng, J. (2015) Synthesis of VPEG Type Polycarboxylate Superplasticizer. Guangzhou
Chemical Industry, 43: 105-107.
[6] Lai, H.Z., Lai, G.X., Fang, Y.H., Lin, Y.M. (2017) Preparation and properties of polycarboxylic
superplasticizer with low sensitivity. New Type of Building Materials, 44: 34-36.

You might also like