I.

DEMOGRAPHIC PROFILE OF THE RESPONDENTS

Table I. Age of the respondents'

Age Frequency Percentage

16 and below 1 2

17- 21years old 45 90

22-26 years old 3 6

27 years old and above 0 0

No response 1 2

TOTAL 50 100

Table 1 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of age.
Majority of the respondents were at the ages of 17-21 years old with a frequency count of 45 (90%). On
the other hand, there were respondents of ages 22-26 years old with a frequency count of 3 (6%); Lastly,
there were responses for both 16 and below and no response with a frequency count of 1 (2%).
Table II. Civil Status

Civil Status Frequency Percentage

Single 50 100

Married 0 0

TOTAL 50 100

Table 2 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of civil
status. All the respondents are single with a frequency count of 50 (100%).
 Table III. Household Income
HOUSHO
FREQUEN PERCENTA
LD
INCOME CY GE
10,000
22 44
and below
11,000 -
9 18
15,000
16,000 -
9 18
20,000
21,000
10 20
and above
TOTAL 50 100

Table 3 shows the frequency and percentage distribution of the respondents in terms of household
income. Majority of the respondents answered 10,000 and below which comprised of 22 (44%); the
respondents also answered 21,000 and above with frequency count of 10 (20%). 11,000-15,000 with
frequency count of 9 (18%); Lastly, the respondents also answered 16,000-20,000 with a frequency count
of 9 (18%).

I. Applicability of Online Learning to the Program During the Pandemic

A. Discussions and Lectures

Table 4 displays the applicability of online learning to the program during the pandemic in terms
of discussions and lectures.

Table 4 displays the students’ experiences with online learning during the pandemic in terms of
discussions and lectures. Using the indicators, the respondents disagreed that all the subjects in the
program can be taught through online class with an average weighted mean of 2.64 and standard
deviation of 1.05; the respondents agreed that the lessons can be discussed through online class with an
average weighted mean of 3.14 and standard deviation of 0.73; the respondents disagreed that the
instructors have the resources and skills necessary to discuss the lessons online with an average
weighted mean of 2.96 with standard deviation of 0.83; respondents agreed that the lesson and lectures
require practical discussion with an average weighted mean of 3.38 with standard deviation of 0.75;
lastly, they disagreed that using different platforms (MS teams, zoom, google classroom, etc.) the lessons
are taught clearly and effectively with an average weighted mean of 2.92 with standard deviation of 0.80;
and that during lectures workbooks is better than e-books. (Pdf, website links, downloadable forms, etc.)
with an average weighted mean of 2.96 with standard deviation of 0.86.

In general, the respondents agreed that the online learning helps in terms of the discussion and
lectures based on their experiences with a general weighted mean of 3.00 with standard deviation of 0.84.
 Table 4.
Applicability of Online Learning to the Program During the Pandemic in terms of
Discussion and Lectures

B. Activities and Exams

Table 5 displays the applicability of online learning to the program during the pandemic in terms
of activities and exams.

Table 5 displays the students’ experiences with online learning during the pandemic in terms of
activities and exams. Using the indicators, the respondents agreed that the program that the
student taking requires laboratories for the activities and exams (science lab, computer lab, etc.) with an
average weighted mean of 3.18 and standard deviation of 0.96; the respondents agreed that
the program requires tools and equipment to use for practical activities and exams that are in the campus
with an average weighted mean of 3.26 and standard deviation of 0.83; Furthermore, both items,
The program requires the students to experience practical activities to be able to learn and the activities
and exams can be accomplished by individual work at home with similar standard deviation of 0.76 and
average weighted mean of 3.40 and 3.20 respectively; the respondents agreed that using collaborative
file sharing (MS teams, zoom, google classroom, etc.) is effective on my program with an average
weighted mean of 3.12 with standard deviation of 0.77; respondents agreed that in doing activities, face-
to-face contact with my instructor is necessary to accomplish the task with an average weighted mean of
3.04 with standard deviation of 0.92; Lastly, respondents disagreed that in answering activities,
workbooks are better than answering in e-learning materials. (docx format, google forms) with an
average weighted mean of 2.84 with standard deviation of 0.93.

In general, the respondents agreed that the online learning helps in doing activities and taking
exams with a general weighted mean of 3.15 with standard deviation of 0.85.
 Table 5.
Applicability of Online Learning to the Program During the Pandemic in terms of
Activities and Exam

C. Projects and Term Paper

Table 6 displays the applicability of online learning to the program during the pandemic in terms
of projects and term papers.

Table 6 displays the students’ experiences with online learning during the pandemic in terms of
projects and term papers. Using the indicators, the respondents agreed that the program requires
practical output with an average weighted mean of 3.20 and standard deviation of 0.81; the respondents
agreed that the projects and term papers in the program requires practical results with an average
weighted mean of 3.20 and standard deviation of 0.73; the respondents agreed that the projects and term
papers can be accomplished in home with an average weighted mean of 3.32 with standard deviation of
0.65; respondents disagreed that the projects and term papers in the program can be accomplished
without the guidance of the instructors with an average weighted mean of 2.66 with standard deviation of
1.08; Lastly, they agreed that personal interaction is much helpful in doing projects
with other student(s) than virtual meetings with an average weighted mean of 3.24 with standard deviation
of 0.82.

In general, the respondents agreed that in online learning set-up students can accomplish projects
and term paper with a general weighted mean of 3.12 with standard deviation of 0.82.
 Table 6.
Applicability of Online Learning to the Program During the Pandemic in terms of
Projects and Term Papers