Lesson 9 Assessment
Lesson 9 Assessment
Objectives: To develop quality test items in mathematics, Analyze different modes of assessing
mathematics with respect to assembling instructional and student performance evidence, make a
critic of existing modes of assessment
Assessment may be defined as any method used to better understand the current knowledge that
a student possess.
This implies that assessment can be as simple as a teacher’s subjective judgment based on a
single observation of a student’s performance, or as complex as a 3 hour standardized test.
The idea of the current knowledge implies that what a student knows is always changing
And that we can make judgments about students’ achievements through comparisons over a
period of time.
Assessment often defines what students must know and be able to succeed in a particular
teacher’s class.
Assessment may affect decisions about grades, advancement, placement, instructional needs and
curriculum.
Assessment is more than just a text at the end of instructional to see how students perform under
special conditions. Therefore assessment should not merely be done to students rather it should
be done for students.
Assessment as learning…self-assessment
One of the main purposes of testing / assessing is to diagnose the learners’ needs so as to
plan his learning better.
To establish how learners have understood various concepts and therefore plan remedial
work accordingly.
To help evaluate the teachers own teaching approaches and instructional pace.
To give feedback that can motivate both the learners and the teachers.
To compare performance.
In general, assessment has the function of providing valid evidence of learning achievement in
order to: Inform the students, to provide provision for further learning and to certify that a
required level has been obtained.
Teachers are able to improve the educational process if they have identified the strengths of their
students and know which area of study require attention. Information provided from assessment
should portray the learner’s level of performance.
Students experiences of how they are taught. How mathematics is taught and how students
experience it shape their understanding and beliefs of what mathematics is all about.
When impulse is knowledge of content and low level skills are used performing routine
procedures and their few opportunities for conceptual understanding, problem solving,
reasoning, determining using mathematical relationships and communicating mathematical ideas.
K…knowledge
C-comprehension
A-application……………:LOTS
A-analysis
S-synthesis
E-evaluation …..HOTS
When emphasis is on getting the correct answer rather than on the quality of thinking that goes
into obtaining the answer.
When time is insufficient for students to demonstrate how well they think.
When the use of concrete materials or calculating devices even when they may be needed is not
allowed.
(i) It should reflect the Mathematics that the students should know and be able to do.
(ii) Enhance Mathematical learning
(iii) Promote equality.
(iv) Be an open process – clear, words should be clear to the students.
(v) It should promote valid inference - a good test should be valid – it should measure what it
was intended for – was the question intended to measure application.
(vi) Assessment should be a coherent/ consistent process. It should be a reliable test – same
results from different groups of the same level are the same.
Valid: both in content and face: is all that is tested in the syllabus, face validity
Reliability: the test should be reliable in producing similar results when subjected to a sample of
some candidates of the same level ie, if the same students sit for the same paper after a period of
time, can it produce the similar result?
Objective: the test should be objective should fair scoring should be determined by the
candidates responses and not whims of the examiner.
Forms of assessment
Diagnostic assessment: – given before a teaching process. It provides the learner’s difficulties,
misconceptions and errors. They form the basis of making informed decisions on the appropriate
instructions and strategies. They help to determine the entry point/ behavior of the learners. Too
often, teachers before establishing the root cause of an error, misconception re-teach the learner
with the same/similar activities in belief that more of the same will bring about the pre-requisite
knowledge and understanding
Formative assessment: This is assessment given during the process and is carried out
continuously during the course of instruction at class level. The focus is to inform the teacher
whether the methods in use are having desired effect.
The teacher continuously assesses the learners through questioning. How they respond shows the
teacher what direction the lesson should take. The teacher is also able to correct misconceptions
In formative assessment, supervised practice in class may be given whereby learners work
individually and the teacher marks the books in class to assess whether the concept taught is
understood. The teacher should analyze the errors made by the students so as to correct
misconceptions.
Assignment is also carried out or assignment given on problem solving. This assessment helps
the teacher again to know whether the learners have understood the concept. The learners too are
encouraged when they get the feedback on their understanding of the concepts.
Mathematics is learnt by doing and not watching others doing it. The learners are encouraged or
motivated to work out actively when teachers mark their work.
Formative assessment is also done when students are given practical such as modelling and the
models awarded marks – this could be done in groups in order to promote collaborative learning.
Learners could also be given an investigative problem and allowed to report in class and their
presentation commented on, e.g. projects of data collection by the road on cars passing at a given
point at a certain period of the day. Statistics on the data could be presented in class.
Continuous assessment either weekly, fortnight, end month or mid-term, end of term tests, end of
year tests and mock examinations are formative assessment.
TEST CONSTRUCTION
In setting a test of any kind there is need to know what one is testing. The syllabus, scheme of
work, and some past papers may be used. There is also need to find out from other teachers for
coverage. When constructing a test, avoid the following questions:
Questions that give an advantage to certain students on the basis of factors other than those being
tested.
By avoiding/eliminating such questions, only questions that reliably identify the particular skills
being tested are left. It is therefore important to think of the skills to be tested before test
construction. To ensure that the test is balanced and valid a table of specifications is needed. For
a teacher to come up with a good test, he should prepare an item specification table (blue print).
This table is a 2-D grid showing abilities versus content as in blooms taxonomy. Abilities are the
same as objectives:
TABLE OF SPECIFICATIONS
This is also referred to as test Blue Print or test plan or test specification or test grid.
K C A A S E Total
Decimal
Integers Q5=
3mks
Equation of Q11=
a line 3mks
Scale Q11=
drawing 10mk
s
Geometrical Q12=
constructions 10mk
s
15% 15 % 30 % 25 % 10 % 5% 100
At least 75% of the syllabus/content should be tested and the skills must be tested.
Angles 2 2 1 1 1 7
Statistics 2 1 2 1 7
Geometry 1 2 1 1 1 6
Total % 5 5 4 3 2 20
Knowledge; comprehension, synthesis and evaluation should be few while the bulk of the
questions should be at application and analysis. Percentages of skills sought in a test are
indicated at the bottom of the table.
The first 3 skills (knowledge, comprehension, and application) are for low ability questions
whereas analysis, synthesis and evaluation questions test high ability questions. Ratio of high
ability to low ability should be 1:3.
It requires the study of each topic to determine its worth in the course by what it
contributes too each class of blooms taxonomy
In moderation questions are worked out to ensure that the marking scheme is in order and
adjustments are also done accordingly.
NB: moderation should be done by at least teachers. After moderation, the paper is taken for
typing, proof read and produced and kept under locked conditions until the day of the
examination. A test seen by the students in advance affects the reliability and validity. The setter
and moderator should not leak the test to the students. On the day of administration of the test, all
should start at the same time and end together.
2) Examination room should be well organized such that no students are either advantaged
or disadvantaged, e.g. clean the blackboard, good sitting arrangement.
3) Question papers should be kept upside down until the time to start, since they may not be
enough.
5) End the test by letting them to stop writing and stand up at once.
A well-constructed test should provide the teacher with information that indicates the following:
Whether they understood the underlying principles of what they are learning
How well they can apply what they know to a new problem.
1) Low stake tests – that encourage student and teacher reflection and are used to inform the
teaching and learning process within classroom. They include: classroom objective tests and
Subjective tests.
2) High state tests: - include achievement tests aptitude tests, diagnostic tests and personality
tests.
5) Set questions that cover as much of the learning to be tested than selected areas.
6) In objective questions (have specific answers), avoid leading solutions by giving obvious
wrong alternatives.
9) Arrange questions according o levels of difficulty; the easier ones should come first.
10) Only set time limit when speed is an element of what is being tested.
MARKING TESTS
Tests can be marked by a team of teachers (pool marking) to ensure that it is marked in time.
The marking should be informative and as objective as possible. Marks should be awarded at the
right places and correct adding done. Marking schemes helps in the allocation of marks, as marks
earned should be directly proportional to the time spent. It shows exactly how many marks are
awarded to the questions and the distribution of marks within each question. During the marking
process, the examiner should be fair and not biased. – “No hallo effect”. Award the student at the
earliest opportunity. Do not delay the awarding of the marks. Mark all the students’ work.
During marking, think with the students but do not think for the students.
They include:
M0 – 0 marks
A – Accuracy mark awarded for correct answer shown. They are of 2 types:
Accuracy mark is scored only if all M marks are scored above in the particular section.
Ao – wrong answer.
B – Marks – awarded for answers that can be obtained without showing any working.
Marks independent of method
S-mark used to correct the scale – when the scale is consistent on each axis and should
accommodate all the values in the table. Good scale should cover at least 2/3 the area of the
graph paper.
C – Mark – for construction of a curve – the curve should be smooth and pass through all the
correctly plotted points.
OW –1 omission of work penalized for not showing working which can not done mentally e.g.
2.585 X 68.75 = _________, Or for not showing vector notation, AB or a.
NB: The penalty should be awarded in a particular section or area deducted from A and B marks
but never from M – Marks
PA1 – Premature approximation – a penalty for approximating values outside the expected
accuracy.
The purpose of test determines the form in which marks are presented. The alternatives include:
Numerical scores – remember numbers alone are meaningless without bench marks in terms of
pass mark or mean grade.
Rank order: this arranges students in merit order; students with the same mark share a position
Analysis of performance
Analyze the performance of the students on each test item. This could include how many got a
given item, what were the difficulties experienced by students, what concepts should be
introduced again. This forms the basis for remedial teaching or re-teaching.
Teacher should be concerned with Value Added Progress (VAP) for each learner and this
should be communicated to the students for guidance & counselling. They should know whether
they should put effort or just maintain the effort.
Teachers should assess whether this is addition of value to the learner or reducing it and be able
to adjust accordingly by giving individualized practice. VAP is assessed by comparing previous
performance viz a vis present performance and determining whether there is a drop or an
improvement in performance.
Record: fill the marks obtained by the students in the record mark books and draw a normal
curve.
Giving feedback: give papers upside down. Arrange papers according to performance range.
Highlight the difficult areas. Comment knowledgeably on the students report form. The
comments should be as encouraging as possible. They should be aimed at giving HOPE.
Summary: team work among teachers is encouraged in Mathematics planning and assessment to
ensure coverage of topics at the same level. A test should cover all topics / content covered
otherwise it will not be valid.