Maternal and Newborn Standards and Indicators Compendium 2004 2
Maternal and Newborn Standards and Indicators Compendium 2004 2
Maternal and Newborn Standards and Indicators Compendium 2004 2
Standards and
Indicators Compendium
Maternal and Newborn
Standards and Indicators
Compendium
December 2004
The CORE Group, a membership association of international nongovernmental organizations
(NGOs) registered in the United States, promotes and improves the health and well being of women
and children in developing countries through collaborative NGO action and learning. Collectively,
its member organizations work in more than 140 countries, supporting health and development
programs. CORE’s Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Working Group supports NGOs
to engage communities for better sexual and reproductive health for all by sharing knowledge
resources and promoting the most up-to-date evidence-based practices, including those affecting safe
delivery and newborn health.
The U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) is committed to improving the health
and well being of women and their families in the developing world. For more than 40 years, USAID
has worked in partnership with private voluntary organizations, American businesses, international
agencies, indigenous organizations, universities, other governments, and other U.S. government agen-
cies to implement quality development programs and projects. USAID improves the health and quality
of life of millions of women and children worldwide through its investments in quality maternal and
neonatal health programs.
This publication was made possible by support from
the Bureau for Global Health, United States Agency for
International Development (USAID) under coopera-
tive agreement FAO-A-00-98-00030. This publication
does not necessarily represent the views or opinion of
USAID.
Recommended Citation
Safe Motherhood and Reproductive Health Working Group, CORE Group, Maternal and Newborn
Standards and Indicators Compendium, Washington, D.C: December 2004.
Abstract
The Maternal and Newborn Standards and Indicators Compendium is designed to assist program
designers in selecting essential components, actions and appropriate indicators for chosen interven-
tions in maternal and newborn care. It includes five interrelated tables that correspond to the temporal
phases of a woman’s reproductive cycle: 1) Pre-Conception/ Inter-Conception; 2) Antenatal; 3) Labor
and Delivery; 4) Postpartum Care; and 5) Newborn Care. The Compendium provides NGOs with
a single source of information to: 1) determine recommended practices and standards of care at the
household, community, and health care facility levels to address maternal and newborn care, and
2) identify which indicators are appropriate to use with the different interventions. Endnotes with
detailed technical information and essential references are included.
Cover photo credits: Virginia Lamprecht/USAID (Albania, Guatemala) and Valenda Campbell/CARE
(Malawi, Sierra Leone).
CORE Group
300 I Street, NE
Washington D.C 20002
www.coregroup.org
Table of Contents
Page v Acknowledgements
vii Acronyms
1 Introduction
2 What Is the Compendium?
2 What Is the Purpose of the Compendium?
3 How Can the Compendium of Standards and Indicators Be Used?
4 Future Editions of this Compendium
5 Intervention Focus: Pre-Conception/Inter-Conception Care [PC]
21 Intervention Focus: Antenatal Care [AC]
35 Intervention Focus: Labor and Delivery [LD]
47 Intervention Focus: Postpartum Care [PP]
61 Intervention Focus: Newborn Care [NC]
73 Appendix 1: Key Indicators
77 Appendix 2: Programming for Maternal and Newborn Health
Figures
78 Figure 1: Generic Results Framework
80 Figure 2: Illustrative Program Design for Prevention of Maternal
Mortality at the Community and Facility Levels
85 Figure 3: Timing of Maternal and Newborn Care Interventions
85 Figure 4: Evidence-based Interventions for Major Causes of
Maternal Mortality
86 Figure 5: Evidence-based Interventions for Major Causes of
Neonatal Mortality
88 Figure 6: Integration of Essential Maternal and Newborn Care
and PMTCT
Tables
79 Table 1: Selecting Interventions by Desired Outcomes (Objective)
81 Table 2: CARE's Programming Approach
82 Table 3: Needs Assessment for Maternal and Newborn Health
84 Table 4: Maternal Conditions and Potential Maternal and
Perinatal Outcomes
Virginia Lamprecht, in her role as Chair of the CORE Safe Motherhood and Reproductive
Health (SMRH) Working Group, led the development of the Maternal and Newborn
Standards and Indicators Compendium over a two-year period, and continued to provide
technical advice and support in her role as Technical Advisor in the Office of Population
and Reproductive Health at the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID). Her
dedication and attention to detail has ensured the high quality of this product.
Sandra Tebben Buffington and Annie Clark of the American College of Nurse Midwives
(ACNM) provided their expertise in drafting the initial set of standards and indicator tables
and detailed endnotes, and then participated in several rounds of discussion and reviews to
ensure that this product represented the best known guidance available at this time. This
product would not have been possible without their collaboration and diligence.
CORE’s SMRH Working Group extends sincere gratitude to the many experts who shared
their time and talent in creating and reviewing these programming standards and indicators.
These include:
Acknowledgements v
Theresa Shaver, White Ribbon Alliance Patricia Stephenson, USAID
Lynn Sibley, Emory University Sharon Tobing, Independent
Sara Smith, CORE Donna Vivio, JHPIEGO
Cindy Stanton, JHU Susan Youll, USAID
Mary Ellen Stanton, USAID Jennifer Yourkavitch, Independent
Ann Starrs, Family Care International Laurie Zivetz, Independent
Although many people participated in task forces over the three years of this effort, sev-
eral people deserve special recognition. Debbie Herold, Karen LeBan, Michel Pacque,
Teresa Shaver and Jennifer Yourkavitch oversaw the final version of the compendium. The
CATALYST Consortium provided financial support for hosting a technical review meet-
ing held at ORC/Macro headquarters in December 2003. Leo Ryan, Director of the Child
Survival Technical Support (CSTS+) Project at ORC/Macro, facilitated the event.
The CORE SMRH Working Group presents this document as a reference guide for the
nongovernmental organization (NGO) community, understanding that as the evidence base
changes so will this guidance. This guide presents the most up-to-date information at the
time it was written. Users of this Compendium may keep abreast of new developments in
standards of care and recommended practices by checking with experts in the field and by
consulting the web-based resources listed at the end of the Compendium.
This collection of programming standards and indicators is dedicated to the 1,440 women
around the world who die in pregnancy or childbirth each day, and to the thousands of
women who suffer disability due to labor.
December 2004
Acronyms vii
HFA health facility assessment
hgb/hct hemoglobin/hematocrit
HIV human immunodeficiency virus
HMIS health management information system
IEC information, education and communication
IM intra-muscular
IMPAC integrated management of pregnancy and childbirth
IMR infant mortality rate
IPPF International Planned Parenthood Federation
IPT intermittent preventive treatment
IR intermediate result
IRC International Rescue Committee
ITN insecticide-treated net
IUD intrauterine device
IV intravenous
IVACG International Vitamin A Consultative Group
JHU Johns Hopkins University
KAP or KPC knowledge, attitudes and practices (or coverage) survey
LAM Lactational Amenorrhea Method
LBW low birth-weight
LD/L&D labor and delivery [household level: LDHH; community level: LDCL;
first level: LDFL; second level: LDSL]
ORC MACRO Macro International, Inc., Opinion Research Corporation
MIS management information system
MMR maternal mortality ratio
MOH Ministry of Health
MOV means of verification
NC newborn care [household level: NCHH; community level: NCCL;
first level: NCFL; second level: NCSL]
NCHS National Center for Health Statistics
NGO nongovernmental organization
OPV oral poliovirus vaccine
PAC post-abortion care
PC pre-conception (pre-conception/interconceptional care)
[household: PCHH; community level: PCCL; first level: PCFL;
second level: PCSL]
PCB polychlorinated biphenyls
PLA Participatory Learning Appraisal
PMTCT prevention of mother-to-child transmission (of HIV)
Acronyms ix
Introduction
“Women are not dying because of diseases we cannot treat. . . they are dying because
societies have yet to make the decision that their lives are worth saving.”
—Mahmoud Fathalla
T
he Maternal and Newborn Standards and Indicators Compendium is designed to
assist program designers working for international nongovernmental organizations
(NGOs) develop high quality programs focused on women and children.
The Maternal and Newborn Standards and Indicators Compendium is the result of a
three-year collaborative effort led by the Safe Motherhood/Reproductive Health (SMRH)
Working Group, CORE Group. The CORE Group is a membership organization of interna-
tional NGOs registered in the United States that promotes and improves the health and well
being of women and children and the communities in which they live, through collaborative
NGO action and learning.
CORE’s main collaborating partners in creating this Compendium include:
• The American College of Nurse-Midwives (ACNM), which promotes the health and
well being of women and infants within their families and communities through the
development and support of the profession of midwifery, as practiced by certified nurse
midwives, and certified midwives,
• The Child Survival Technical Support (CSTS+) Project team at ORC/Macro, a group
whose mission is to provide technical support to U.S.-based NGOs implementing child
health programs supported through the Child Survival and Health Grants Program
(CSHGP) of the United States Agency for International Development (USAID), and
• USAID, which provided financial support for this effort.
In addition, more than 40 experts in the fields of safe motherhood, reproductive health,
child survival, and program design, monitoring, evaluation, and implementation contrib-
uted to this effort by providing technical comments, providing illustrations, and offering
suggestions in the design of the Compendium. These contributing experts represent USAID
Cooperating Agencies (CAs), US-based international NGOs, universities, and USAID staff
members.
Introduction 1
What Is the Compendium?
The Maternal and Newborn Standards and Indicators Compendium consists of five inter-
related tables that correspond to the temporal phases of a woman’s reproductive cycle:
1. Pre-Conception/ Inter-Conception
2. Antenatal
3. Labor and Delivery
4. Postpartum Care
5. Newborn Care
Each table is divided into four levels that correspond to where (and to whom) most pro-
grammatic interventions and activities are focused:
1. Household—refers to behaviors and care provided by family members and other per-
sons living in the same household or compound.
2. Community—refers to health education, actions, and care provided by community
health workers (CHWs) and educators, community-based distribution agents (CBDAs),
traditional birth attendants (TBAs), local community leaders, community groups, tradi-
tional healers, and junior health staff (such as auxiliary nurses) at health posts.
3. First-Level Care—refers to basic or Essential Obstetric Care (EOC) provided by phy-
sicians and/or midwives, nurses, paramedical, and support staff at a health center.
Essential Obstetric Care represents the minimum amount of interventions needed to
promote a healthy pregnancy and birth outcome. This includes antenatal care (screen-
ing for infection, diseases, provision of tetanus toxoid injections, good nutrition), birth
planning, ensuring delivery with a skilled attendant, proper referral for the management
of obstetrical complications (emergency obstetric care), and post-partum monitoring
and care.
4. Second-Level Care—refers to comprehensive [emergency] obstetric care (including
blood transfusions and operations such as C-sections) provided by physicians, mid-
wives, nurses, paramedical, and support staff at a district hospital (or in a referral ter-
tiary facility). Emergency Obstetric Care (EmOC) represents the minimum amount of
interventions needed to appropriately manage obstetrical complications. This includes
surgical obstetrics (C-sections, treatment of lacerations, laporotomy), anesthesia, medi-
cal treatment of shock, eclampsia and anemia, blood replacement, manual procedures,
and assisted delivery.
Please note that the actions and activities described at each level are the ideal. The actual
level and quality of care offered at various facility types varies widely by country and by
region within countries.
Introduction 3
Most of the indicators in the Compendium identify a means of verification (MOV)—a
data source from which to gather data to construct the indicator. The MOVs include, but
are not limited to, the following data sources:
• Population-based household surveys such as a KAP or KPC survey (Knowledge,
Attitudes, and Practices (or Coverage) Surveys)
• Community Assessments
• Health Facility Assessments (HFA)
• Ministry of Health (MOH) statistics
• HF (Health Facility) statistics
• Health Management Information System (HMIS) (project data)
• Exit Interviews
• Focus groups
• In-depth interviews
Note: Several tools used by many international NGOs, including the KPC 2000+ Survey, are
available on the Child Survival Technical Support Project (CSTS+) web site at: http://www.
childsurvival.com/kpc2000/kpc2000.cfm.
The endnotes, located at the end of each of the five tables, provide detailed technical
information and are directly linked (by numbers) to the main standards and indicators
tables.
Additional information and references relating to designing programs for maternal and
newborn health can be found in Appendix 2. Topics include using frameworks for program
design, program planning, needs assessments, and the causes of maternal and newborn
mortality and evidenced-based interventions. Essential References and helpful web sites are
also included.
HH
Household Level (PCHH): Provides Security, Support, Safety and Self-Esteem 2 to girls (<5 years old), female youth (ages 5–18) and Women of
Reproductive Age (WRA ages 15–49)
PCHH S-1. Girls, female youth, and WRA get PCHH I-1. Percent of boys and girls age 0–23 months who are underweight (-2 SD from the median weight-
adequate food and micronutrients for appropriate for-age, according to the WHO/NCHS reference population)* (Means of Verification [MOV]: population-
growth.3 based survey)
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: Number of children age 0–23 months whose weight is –2 SD from the
median weight of the WHO/NCHS reference population for their age.
Denominator: Number of children age 0–23 months in the survey who were weighed (If there is reason to
believe that girls are fed differently than boys, then compute a ratio of malnutrition [girls to boys] using the
data collected.)
PCHH I-2. Percent of WRA living in households using adequately iodized salt**
(MOV: population-based survey)
PCHH I-3. Percent of WRA who have a low body mass index**
(MOV: population-based survey)
PCHH I-4. Percent of WRA with a low mid-upper arm circumference*
(MOV: population-based survey)
PCHH I-5. Percent of WRA with anemia**
(MOV: population-based survey or surveillance)
PCHH S-2. Girls receive appropriate care when ill. PCHH I-6. Percent of sick girls age 0–23 months who received increased fluids and continued feeding during an ill-
ness in the past two weeks*
(MOV: population-based survey)
PCHH I-7. Percent of mothers of girls age 0–23 months that recognize at least two danger signs of child illness*:
• Looks unwell or not playing normally
• Not eating or drinking
• Lethargic or difficult to wake
• High fever
• Fast or difficult breathing
• Vomits everything
• Convulsions
(MOV: population-based survey)
5
Intervention Focus: Pre-conception/Inter-conception Care [PC]
PCHH S-3. Girls, female youth and WRA live and PCHH I-8. Percent of caregivers that can state what GBV means
work in a safe environment, including protection (MOV: population-based survey; client exit interview)
from gender based violence (GBV) (female genital
PCHH I-9. Percent of children (girls) age 0–23 months who slept under an insecticide-treated net (in malaria risk
cutting [FGC], child and sexual abuse, domestic
areas) the previous night*
violence), smoking, alcohol, and environmental
(MOV: population-based survey)
hazards.4
PCHH I-10. Percent of WRA (or subset) not exposed to smoking, alcohol, and environmental hazards, including
GBV in past year
(MOV: population-based survey; youth survey)
PCHH I-11. Percent of WRA allowed to go alone to the health center**
(MOV: population-based survey; youth survey)
PCHH I-12. Participation of women in household decision-making index**
(MOV: population-based survey)
PCHH I-13. Percent of WRA who have weekly exposure to mass media**
(MOV: population-based survey; youth survey)
PCHH I-14. Percent of youth who regularly use drugs/alcohol
(MOV: youth survey)
6
Intervention Focus: Pre-conception/Inter-conception Care [PC]
RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AND
STANDARDS OF CARE INDICATORS
HH
Household Level (PCHH): Provides Security, Support, Safety and Self-Esteem 2 to girls (<5 years old), female youth (ages 5–18) and Women of
Reproductive Age (WRA ages 15–49)
PCHH S-4. Girls attend school at least through pri- PCHH I-15. Ratio of girls to boys in primary schools in catchment area
mary school education.5 (MOV: school records)
In regions with high primary school completion, we PCHH I-16. Percent of WRA who have completed at least four years of schooling**
would recommend using ‘secondary school’ in the (MOV: population-based survey)
standard. Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: #of women ages 15–49 who completed four years of schooling;
Denominator: Total # of women ages
15–49
This indicator measures the percent of women ages 15–49 who have completed at least a primary level of educa-
tion. For different countries, primary education may vary from four years to eight to ten years.
PCHH S-5. Girls delay marriage/childbirth to the age PCHH I-17. Percent of WRA married in the past year that were 18 years or older at the time of marriage7
of 18.6 (MOV: population-based survey; marriage registry)
PCHH S-6. Girls and boys get information on sexual PCHH I-18. Percent of girls and boys who can state:
and reproductive health issues8 including protection • Two benefits to delaying marriage and childbirth
from unintended pregnancy (family planning9) and • Two ways to avoid pregnancy
HIV/AIDS.10 • Two ways to prevent HIV/AIDS
(MOV: youth survey)
7
Intervention Focus: Pre-conception/Inter-conception Care [PC]
PCHH S-7. Youth practice safe sex and avoid unin- PCHH I-19. Percent of sexually active youth who used a condom at first/last sexual intercourse**
tended pregnancy and sexually transmitted infec- (MOV: youth survey)
tions (STIs).
PCHH I-20. Percent of sexually active youth who used contraception at last intercourse
(MOV: youth survey)
PCHH I-21. Percent of youth that abstain from sexual intercourse
(MOV: youth survey)
PCHH I-22. Number of sexual partners among sexually active youth during the past six months** (MOV: youth
survey)
PCHH I-23. Number/percent of youth who have experienced coercive or forced sex**
(MOV: youth survey)
PCHH S-8. WRA practice birth spacing. PCHH I-24. % of women married or in union 15–49 years who are not pregnant or are unsure, who are using a
modern family planning method***
(MOV: population-based survey)
PCHH I-25. Percent of mothers who report at least one place where she can obtain a method of family planning*
(MOV: population-based survey)
PCHH I-26. Percent of children aged 0–23 months who were born at least 24 months after the previous surviving
child*
(MOV: population-based survey)
PCHH I-27. Percent of mothers who received family planning information during a postpartum check-up*
(MOV: population-based survey)
8
Intervention Focus: Pre-conception/Inter-conception Care [PC]
PCCL S-1. Community Health Workers (CHWs)/ PCCL I-1. Percent of CHWs/community leaders that recognize at least two danger signs of child illness:
community leaders monitor health status of both • Looks unwell or not playing normally
girls and boys in the community, recommend stan- • Not eating or drinking
dards of care and refer for care when needed. • Lethargic or difficult to wake
• High fever
• Fast or difficult breathing
• Vomits everything
• Convulsions
(MOV: community assessment)
PCCL I-2. Percent of trained CHWs serving the community appropriately
(MOV: CHW supervisory records)
PCCL S-2. CHWs/community leaders promote and/ PCCL I-3. Percent of CHWs/community leaders who can state 3 ways to ensure a safe environment for WRA.
or have policies to ensure a safe environment for (MOV: community assessment)
WRA:
PCCL I-4. Percent of households of mothers with children age 0–23 months that have soap readily available for hand-
Develop and/or support clean water supply and use washing.*13
of latrines11 (MOV: population-based survey)
• Discourage and have disciplinary action for
persons who commit GBV12, (domestic vio- PCCL I-5. Percent of families with functional latrines
lence, child and sexual abuse) (MOV: population-based survey)
• Identify and monitor for environmental haz- PCCL I-6. Percent of CHWs/community leaders who support anti-smoking and no use of alcohol by youth
ards such as toxic waste (MOV: community assessment)
• Actively support anti-smoking programs and
no use of alcohol by youth See also PCHH I-10, I-14
9
Intervention Focus: Pre-conception/Inter-conception Care [PC]
PCCL S-3. Community leaders ensure the avail- See PCHH I-15, I-16
ability of schools and encourage parents to send all
girls and boys to school
PCCL S-4. CHWs/community leaders openly sup- PCCL I-7. Percent of villages with leadership that supports girls delaying marriage until age 18.
port and encourage delayed marriage (after 18 (MOV: community assessment)
years) for the health and well-being of WRA and
families See also PCHH I-17
PCCL S-5. Community leaders recognize the PCCL I-8. Percent of community leadership positions held by women
importance of women and their contributions to the (MOV: community assessment)
community
PCCL S-6. CHWs/community leaders provide coun- PCCL I-9. Percent of CHWs/community leaders providing counseling and education on pregnancy,
seling and education on pregnancy, birth planning birth planning and STIs
and STIs14 (MOV: community assessment, CBDA records)
10
Intervention Focus: Pre-conception/Inter-conception Care [PC]
PCFL S-1. Health facility personnel support and PCFL I-1. Percent of facilities screening for GBV
promote the health of girls, female youth, and (MOV: Health Facility Assessment (HFA) /checklist JHPIEGO/IPPF)
WRA:
PCFL I-2. Percent of facilities providing care for GBV in non-judgmental manner
(MOV: HFA /checklist JHPIEGO/IPPF)
• Screen for and treat malaria and infectious
diseases16 PCFL I-3. Percent of clients satisfied with services provided
• Screen for and treat malnutrition and ane- (MOV: client satisfaction survey; client exit interviews)
mia17
PCFL I-4. Percent of facilities that provide ‘youth-friendly’ services
• Screen for GBV, including sexual and child
(MOV: HFA)
abuse and FGC
• Treatment and follow-up for congenitally or PCFL I-5. Percent of staff trained to work with and provide services to youth**
birth-acquired, as well as sexually-acquired, (MOV: HFA)
STIs (gonorrhea, chlamydia, syphilis)
• Health education PCFL I-6. Percent of youth aware of ‘youth-friendly’ health services**
• Provide ‘youth friendly’ reproductive health (MOV: youth survey)
services,18 including education/information PCFL I-7. Percent of youth served or reached by the ‘youth friendly’ services**
and contraception, and promote the use of (MOV: health facility records)
dual protection19 family planning for sexually
active WRA in order to delay pregnancy until PCFL I-8. Percent of female youth/WRA who can explain dual protection
at least 18 years of age (MOV: youth survey)
PCFL I-9. Percent of facilities exhibiting gender sensitivity in the service delivery environment**
(MOV: HFA)
11
Intervention Focus: Pre-conception/Inter-conception Care [PC]
PCFL S-2. Health facilities are prepared to provide PCFL I-10. Percent of facilities prepared to provide the essential services**
the essential services20 (MOV: HFA, including interviews with staff and facility inventory of equipment and supplies)
PCFL S-3. Health facility personnel work with PCFL I-11. Number of school visits by health facility personnel per year
teachers at public, private and religious schools to: (MOV: school and health personnel management records)
• Support girls from 10–24 years to continue in
PCFL I-12. Percent of schools with active peer discussion groups
school
(MOV: school records)
• Promote good nutrition through development
of school gardens, consumption of locally PCFL I-13. Percent of students who pass school examination on sexual and reproductive health issues
available foods, and micronutrient supplemen- (MOV: school records)
tation
• Share accurate basic sexual and reproductive PCFL I-14. Percent of schools with school gardens
health information (MOV: school assessment)
• Hold peer discussion groups on body changes; PCFL I-15. Percent of schools providing micronutrient supplements to at-risk youth
sexuality; GBV; prevention of: pregnancy, (MOV: school records; health facility records)
sexually transmitted infections (STI), and HIV/
AIDS See also PCHH I-14 – I-23
• Provide periodic assessments and IEC with
a focus on malnutrition, infectious diseases,
GBV
In areas where children do not have access to
school:
Health facility personnel work with community
leaders and youth groups to support literacy
training.
12
Intervention Focus: Pre-conception/Inter-conception Care [PC]
RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AND
STANDARDS OF CARE INDICATORS
First Level (PCFL): Works with community-based distribution agents (CBDAs), community leaders, teachers, religious leaders to promote the
1 health of girls, and discourage violence, abuse and body mutilation including FGC15; provides ‘youth friendly’ reproductive health services and
referral
PCFL S-4. Clinic personnel identify WRA approaching marriage age or 1-2 PCFL I-16. Percent of girls/young WRA of marriage age provided services and support by clinic
years younger and provide the following services and support: personnel
• Nutrition (including micronutrients and/or multivitamin supplements) (MOV: health facility records)
counseling to young WRA and parents/caretaker/ husband-to-be:
PCFL I-17. Percent of female youth/WRA who are anemic
– Need for nutritious food and adequate weight of woman/ mother
(MOV: HF records)
for healthy pregnancy and infant survival
– Encourage the regular intake of iron/folate tablets PCFL I-18. Percent of anemic female youth/WRA who are given iron/folate tablets
• Monitor for GBV and provide counseling regarding abuse and its devas- (MOV: HF records)
tating affects on women, infants and families PCFL I-19. Percent of WRA who cite at least two known ways of reducing the risk of HIV
• FP counseling and services including the importance of pregnancy delay infection*
until at least 18 years (MOV: population-based survey; client exit interview)
• Health education on STIs and HIV/AIDS prevention21
• Education and support for living and working in a safe environment PCFL I-20. Percent of facilities offering three or more modern FP methods
including protection from gender violence (domestic violence and sexual (MOV: HFA)
abuse), smoking and alcohol, environmental hazards See also PCHH I-10, I-19 – I-23; PCFL I-1 – I-9
PCFL S-5. Establishes and promotes the use of a “marriage visit” by young PCFL I-21. Percent of young married couples who attended a “marriage visit”
couples that would include: (MOV: health facility records)
• Adequate food intake and iron/folate for WRA prior to and during PCFL I-22. Couple-years of protection**
pregnancy, and during breastfeeding (MOV: service statistics or MIS)
• Physical exams focusing on nutritional status, reproductive health,
STIs, HIV/AIDS22 PCFL I-23. Percent of young couples who state the reason to delay pregnancy until after 18
• Other topics listed in PCFL S-4. years old
(MOV: client exit interview)
PCFL I-24. Unmet need for family planning**
(MOV: population-based survey)
PCFL S-6. Health facilities provide post-abortion care23. PCFL I-25. Percent of facilities providing post-abortion care**
(MOV: HFA)
PCFL I-26. Percent of practitioners trained in PAC**
(MOV: HFA)
PCFL I-27. Percent of health facilities that offer family planning to PAC patients**
(MOV: HFA)
13
Intervention Focus: Pre-conception/Inter-conception Care [PC]
PCSL S-1. Apply PCFL S-1 to the hospital and out- PCSL I-1. Percent skilled health workers providing comprehensive care
patient clinics (MOV: supervisory records; HFA)
See also PCFL I-1 – I-9; PCHH I-1 - I-10, I-14, I-17 – I-27
PCSL S-2. Provide in-service training for facility PCSL I-2. Percent of facility staff and area health workers receiving in-service training on the care of female youth and
staff and other area health workers on the care of WRA prior to pregnancy
female youth and WRA prior to pregnancy (MOV: health facility records)
PCSL I-3. Percent of staff and area health workers who distribute iron/folate to girls/young WRA
(MOV: supervisory records)
14
Endnotes
1. “Main interventions to be available to women and men of reproductive age include nutrition
education . . . family planning . . . prevention and treatment of sexually transmitted infections
[including HIV/AIDS], and general health services to enhance knowledge and understanding
of their bodies.” Promoting Quality Maternal and Newborn Care: A Reference Manual for
Program Managers. (1998). Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere, Inc. (CARE),
Chapter 5.
Pre-pregnancy care
Gay J, Hardee K, et al. What Works: Safe Motherhood. Policy Project, Washington: 2003, p. 85-94.
2. All girls and young women need ‘security’, which includes food, shelter and clothing; ‘support’,
which includes schooling, health care, etc.; ‘safety’, which includes protection from unsanitary
living conditions, domestic/child/sexual abuse, smoking and alcohol, and environmental and
occupational hazards such as use of pesticides, poisonous materials; ‘self-esteem’, which includes
decision-making, having choices in life and belief in the possibility of a healthy, happy and safe
future for herself and her family.
3. “Girls are often underfed and their malnutrition is closely linked with low women’s status and
societal norms.” “…Emphasis should be placed on improving pre-pregnancy weights (of
girls) so that women do not enter pregnancy in a nutritionally disadvantaged state.” “The
combination of low pre-pregnancy weight and pregnancy weight gain has detrimental effects on
infant outcomes. An estimated 450 million adult women in the developing world are stunted
(short for their age) resulting from chronic protein-energy malnutrition throughout their lives.
Promoting Quality Maternal and Newborn Care: A Reference Manual for Program Managers.
(1998). Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere, Inc. (CARE) Chapter 2.
“If weights are known before or early in pregnancy, a low weight for height of 10 percent
or more below reference can be a rough indicator of undernutrition.” “When caloric
HH
Household Level (ACHH): The Household2 prepares for birth and is ready for complications, including accessing essential and emergency care
during pregnancy, identifying danger signs, and establishing a supportive environment for the pregnant woman.
ACHH S-1. Family plans for the use of a skilled ACHH I-1. Percent of pregnant women receiving ANC who have a birth plan (including use of a skilled
provider at birth. provider at birth)
(Means of Verification [MOV]: HF records; population-based survey; ANC client survey or exit interview)
ACHH S-2. Pregnant woman seeks antenatal care3 ACHH I-2. Percent of pregnant women/family in catchment area who can state the benefits of antenatal care
four times during an uncomplicated pregnancy from (MOV: population-based survey; ANC client survey or exit interview)
a skilled provider when:
ACHH I-3. Percent of mothers of children aged 0-23 months in catchment area that saw a skilled provider three
• Pregnancy first suspected (before end of 16 or more times during last pregnancy*
weeks) (MOV: population-based survey; HF records)
• Between 24 and 28 weeks
• At 32 weeks Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: number of mothers of children aged 0-23 months in catchment area that
• At 36 weeks saw a skilled provider three or more times during last pregnancy. Denominator: number of mothers of children
aged 0–23 months.
ACHH S-3. Household-level use of key ANC inter- ACHH I-4. Percent of women receiving ANC who can name two local dietary sources of iron
ventions: (MOV: population-based survey; HF records)
• Nutrition4: take iron/folate5, vitamin A6 (in ACHH I-5. Percent of mothers who received/bought iron supplements while pregnant with the youngest child less
areas of endemic vitamin A deficiency); eat an than 24 months of age*
extra meal; drink 6–8 cups liquids daily7 (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; ANC client or exit interview)
• Rest daily8
• Practice safer sex ACHH I-6. Percent of pregnant women who gain at least 1kg per month in the last two trimesters of pregnancy
• Malaria prevention and management in areas (MOV: HF records)
of endemic malaria
ACHH I-7. (In malaria endemic area) Percent of women receiving ANC who took two or more doses of IPT
• Hookworm prevention/treatment9 in areas of
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records)
endemic hookworm
• TB prevention and treatment10 ACHH I-8. (In malaria endemic area) Percent of women using ITNs
• Safe environment (including protection from (MOV: population-based survey)
GBV, smoking11, alcohol, and environmental
ACHH I-9. Percent of women attending ANC who cite at least two known ways of reducing the risk of HIV
hazards12)
infection
(MOV: ANC client survey or exit interview; HF records)
21
Intervention Focus: Antenatal Care1 [AC]
RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AND
STANDARDS OF CARE INDICATORS
HH
Household Level (ACHH): The Household2 prepares for birth and is ready for complications, including accessing essential and emergency care
during pregnancy, identifying danger signs, and establishing a supportive environment for the pregnant woman.
ACHH I-10. Percent of pregnant women who receive antihelminthic treatment ***
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records; ANC client or exit interview)
ACHH I-11. Percent of women attending ANC who receive vitamin A supplementation (in areas of endemic vitamin
A deficiency)
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records; ANC client or exit interview)
ACHH I-12. Percent of pregnant women with TB who complete treatment
(MOV: HF records)
ACHH S-4. Pregnant woman and family recognize ACHH I-13. Percent of women/families receiving ANC who can state four danger signs of pregnancy
and act appropriately on the danger signs of (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; ANC client survey or exit interview)
pregnancy14:
• Any bleeding15
• Swelling of hands/face and severe headache16
• Fits17
• No fetal movement after 24 weeks18
• Fever19
• Severe pain in abdomen or when passing
urine20
ACHH S-5. Pregnant woman and household make ACHH I-14. Percent of women/families who have chosen feeding option for baby
plans for normal and complicated birth.21 (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; ANC client survey or exit interview)
• Planning for normal delivery22 (travel and ACHH I-15. Percent of women/families receiving ANC who have prepared clean birthing kit / necessary supplies for
lodging to facility with skilled provider, or birth
clean birth kit23 for delivery at home) (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; ANC client survey or exit interview)
• Recognition of danger signs and complications
of pregnancy ACHH I-16. Percent women/families who have given birth in past 12 months who report
• Establishing transport plans • use of skilled provider during birth
• Knowing where to go in case of emergency • feeding option chosen before birth
• Money in case of emergency • having, during pregnancy, a plan for what to do in event of danger sign
• Identifying blood donors (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; ANC client survey or exit interview)
• Preparing to breastfeed24 or not if HIV+ Also see ACHH I-13.
mother decides
22
Intervention Focus: Antenatal Care1 [AC]
ACHH S-6. Pregnant woman/partner have plans for ACHH I-17. Percent women receiving ANC who report birth spacing plans
birth spacing after birth25, 26 (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; ANC client survey or exit interview)
ACHH I-18. Percent of women who report at least one place where she can obtain a method of family planning*
(MOV: population-based survey)
ACHH I-19. Percent of children aged 0–23 months who were born at least 24 months after the previous surviving
child*
(MOV: population-based survey)
ACHH I-20. Percent of pregnant women who can state two benefits of birth spacing
(MOV: HF records; ANC client or exit interviews)
ACHH I-21. Percent of postpartum mothers who report initiating use of a modern method of FP within six weeks after
birth**
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records; CBDA records)
23
Intervention Focus: Antenatal Care1 [AC]
C
Community Level (ACCL): The COMMUNITY facilitates birth preparedness and birth complication readiness at the household
and community levels.
ACCL S-1. Community mobilization (TBAs, CHWs, and ACCL I-1. Percent of TBAs/CHWs/community members interviewed who can state two benefits of pregnancy
other community members) for birth planning, complica- care
tion readiness and education27 including28, 29, 30: (MOV: HF records; community assessment)
• Key household ANC interventions (see ACHH S-3)
ACCL I-2. Percent TBAs/CHWs/community members interviewed who can name four components of birth
• Planning for normal delivery
planning/complication readiness
• Recognize and respond to danger signs in mother
(MOV: HF records; community assessment)
• First aid care in order to stabilize the woman or new-
born with a complication until reaching trained health ACCL I-3. Percent TBAs/CHWs/community members interviewed who can name four danger signs for the
worker woman
• Encourage four ANC visits (MOV: HF records; community assessment)
• PMTCT (in HIV/AIDS-affected areas)
• Family planning and birth spacing ACCL I-4. Percent of TBAs/CHWs/community members interviewed who have knowledge of PMTCT
(MOV: HF records; community assessment)
See other services in endnotes31
Also see ACHH I-4 – I-11
ACCL S-2. Community mobilization for emergency finance ACCL I-5. Percent of communities that have an emergency transport system
scheme, emergency transport scheme, and blood donor (MOV: HF records; community assessment)
pool32
ACCL I-6. Percent of communities that have an emergency financing system
(MOV: HF records; community assessment)
ACCL I-7. Percent of communities that have a blood donor system
(MOV: HF records; community assessment)
ACCL S-3. TBAs/CHWs/community members record preg- ACCL I-8. Percent of TBAs/ CHWs/community members/communities that have a register recording pregnant
nant women and outcomes33 women and outcomes
(MOV: community assessment)
24
Intervention Focus: Antenatal Care1 [AC]
RECOMMENDED PRACTICES
AND STANDARDS OF CARE INDICATORS
1 First Level34 (ACFL): Skilled ANC provides for normal pregnancies and manages and/or refers complications.
ACFL S-1. Provide skilled ANC35 ACFL I-1. Percent of women receiving ANC who are counseled and tested for HIV
including: (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; ANC client survey or exit interview)
• Discuss preparation for birth36 ACFL I-2. Percent of women receiving ANC who report being counseled on danger signs; rest and nutrition; safer sex; breastfeed-
• Identify/manage complications37 ing; LAM; birth spacing; protection from environmental hazards
• Provide iron/folate, tetanus tox- (MOV: population-based survey; ANC client survey or exit interview)
oid, vitamin A
• Provide malaria and parasite ACFL I-3. Percent of women receiving ANC who report that partner/family were included in education, birth planning and care
prevention38 and treatment39 (MOV: ANC client survey or exit interview)
according to country protocols
ACFL I-4. Percent of mothers with children age 0–23 months who received at least two tetanus toxoid injections before the birth of
• Screen and manage anemia,
their youngest child*
hypertension, TB, STIs, (provide
(MOV: population-based survey)
essential antenatal laboratory
tests)40 Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: number of mothers with children age 0–23 months who received at least two tetanus toxoid
• Counsel and test for HIV/AIDS41 injections before the birth of her youngest child (confirmed by maternal health card).
• Screen and provide counseling Denominator: Number of mothers with children age 0–23 months.
and referrals for GBV42 and
protection from environmental ACFL I-5. Percent of women with child under 12 months of age who report receiving at least 90 iron tablets during last pregnancy
hazards (MOV: population-based survey)
• Counsel woman and family on ACFL I-6. Percent of service sites where providers encourage participation of partner/family in education, birth planning, and care
danger signs, rest and nutrition, (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; ANC client survey or exit interview)
safer sex, birth spacing, LAM,
ACFL I-7. Percent of facilities screening for GBV in non-judgmental manner
breastfeeding
(MOV: HFA/checklist JHPIEGO/ IPPF)
• Referral system in place for care
not available at first level ACFL I-8. Percent of clients satisfied with services provided
• Encourage involvement of part- (MOV: client satisfaction survey; client exit interviews)
ner/family in education, birth ACFL I-9. Percent of facilities exhibiting gender sensitivity in the service delivery environment***
planning and care (MOV: HFA)
ACFL I-10. Percent of ANC service delivery points with adequate supplies.
(MOV: HFA)
ACFL I-11. Percent of pregnant women receiving ANC who have received hgb/hct and RPR testing
(MOV: HF records)
ACFL I-12. Percent of pregnant women diagnosed with and treated for syphilis
(MOV: HF records)
Also see ACHH I-1 – I-11
25
Intervention Focus: Antenatal Care1 [AC]
ACFL S-2. ANC providers link to community net- ACFL I-13. Percent of ANC service sites that have a method for eliciting/seeking community input re: ANC services
works, and works with community, providing infor- (MOV: HFA)
mation about family planning and building capacity
ACFL I-14. Percent of ANC service sites that have met with community committee or key community group/
for activities listed in ACCL S-1.
member(s) during past three months
(MOV: HF records)
ACFL I-15. Percent of ANC service sites that have program/plan to reach community with information about birth
planning, danger signs, and family planning
(MOV: HFA)
ACFL S-3. Provide pregnant women with HIV ACFL I-16. Percent health facility staff with knowledge about HIV counseling, testing, prevention, and treatment
counseling and services, using country HIV proto- (MOV: HFA)
col, regarding:
ACFL I-17. Percent pregnant women receiving HIV counseling and testing
• Counseling and testing
(MOV: HF records; ANC client survey or exit interview)
• Transmission of HIV—how virus is spread
• Feeding options45, 46, 47 for HIV-positive ACFL I-18. Percentage of mothers with children age 0–23 months who cite at least two known ways of reducing the
mothers risk of HIV infection*
• Treatment with anti-retroviral drugs, if appro- (MOV: population-based survey)
priate and feasible/country HIV protocol
• How to avoid sexual transmission of HIV
ACFL S-4. Provide pregnant women with informa- See ACHH I-16 – I-20
tion regarding family planning options available so
that children are spaced at least 36 months apart
(PVOs may choose to select 24 months as a bench-
mark)
26
Intervention Focus: Antenatal Care1 [AC]
ACSL S-1. Reduce delays in receiving treatment: ACSL I-1. Percent of staff who can demonstrate how to perform a manual vacuum aspiration for bleeding in
• Health workers skilled in providing care for early pregnancy.
pregnant women with signs of a complication (MOV: HFA)
of pregnancy49 ACSL I-2. Percent of staff who can state how to manage bleeding in later pregnancy
• Essential drugs50 for complications during (MOV: HFA)
pregnancy available in facilities
ACSL I-3. Percent of staff who can state how to manage headache/blurred vision/convulsions during pregnancy
• Skilled and informed workers available 24
(MOV: HFA)
hours a day, seven days per week for complica-
tions ACSL I-4. Percent of staff who can state how to manage fever during pregnancy
(MOV: HFA)
ACSL I-5. Percent of women with convulsions during pregnancy who were treated with magnesium sulfate in the
past 12 months
(MOV: HF records)
ACSL I-6. Percent of facilities with uterotonic, magnesium sulfate, RL or NS infusion, ampicillin, gentamycin,
and amoxicillin (or trimeth/sulfamethoxazole) available on day of survey
(MOV: HFA).
ACSL I-7. Percent of health facilities with skilled attendant (doctor, nurse or midwife) available 24 hours per day,
seven days per week
(MOV: HFA)
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: number of health facilities with skilled attendant (doctor, nurse or midwife)
available 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Denominator: number of health facilities
27
Endnotes
1. Focused antenatal care recognizes that every pregnancy is at risk. Antenatal care is not able to
predict all complications, but effective antenatal care balances support for women with normal
pregnancies and early detection and effective management of complications. JHPIEGO. (2004)
“Focused Antenatal Care: Planning and Proving Care During Pregnancy,” Baltimore, U.S.A.
2. Household level is defined as the mother of the baby, her family and helpers providing first aid
in the home or during referral. Buffington, S., Sibley, L., Beck, D., Armbruster, D. (2004). Home
Based Life Saving. Guidelines for Decision Makers and Trainers: Protocols. American College of
Nurse-Midwives, Silver Spring, MD, U.S.A.
3. Essential antenatal care: 1. Identify/manage complications, 2. Provide iron/folate, tetanus
toxoid, vitamin A, malaria and parasite prevention and treatment according to country
protocols, 3. Screen and manage HIV/AIDS, tuberculosis, STDs, 4. Discuss preparation for birth
including five cleans, identification of birth attendant, plan for contacting attendant at time of
delivery, transportation plan, family caregivers, ready for emergency with money, transportation,
blood donors, and decision makers, 4. Counsel woman and family on danger signs, nutrition,
family planning, breastfeeding, HIV. Beck, D., Buffington, S., McDermott, J., Berney, K. (1998).
Healthy Mother Healthy Newborn Care. American College of Nurse-Midwives, Washington,
D.C., USA.,
4. See Maternal Nutrition During Pregnancy and Lactation. LINKAGES and The CORE Group’s
Nutrition Working Group; August, 2004; www.linkagesproject.org and www.coregroup.org
“Universal or targeted food fortification can reduce nutritional deficits. In most societies,
women are more likely to be malnourished.” Gay J, Hardee K, et al. What Works: Safe
Motherhood. Policy Project, Washington: 2003, p. 78.
“Periconceptual intake of 400ug of folic acid daily can reduce the risk of neural tube defects,
including anencephaly, spina bifida, iniencephaly, craniorachischisis, and encephalocele, but not
isolated hydrocephalus . . . Adequate amounts of calcium and magnesium reduce the risk of
eclampsia and prematurity . . . Adequate maternal iodine can halve infant mortality rates and
improve infant health.” Ibid., pp. 81–2.
“Increasing women’s access to microcredit, nutritional information, and technical assistance,
may improve the effectiveness of micronutrient interventions.” Ibid., p. 83.
5. Iron/folate tablets 320 mg (60 mg elemental iron) two times a day, folic acid 500 mcg daily,
and vitamin C daily either 250 mg tablet or advise three daily servings of citrus or leafy green
vegetables; taken during pregnancy and 40 days after baby is born to prevent anemia. Beck,
D., Buffington, S., McDermott, J., Berney, K. (1998). Healthy Mother Healthy Newborn Care.
American College of Nurse-Midwives, Washington, D.C., USA.
“Treating severe iron-deficiency during pregnancy may reduce the risk of maternal mortality .
. . Treating iron-deficiency anemia with iron during pregnancy has been shown to reduce the
prevalence of anemia and maternal morbidity; in the second trimester, providing iron together
with folate, B-12, riboflavin, and treatment for parasitic infections reduces the risk of maternal
morbidity . . . Training, IEC campaigns, and distribution of iron tablets can reduce anemia.”
Gay J, Hardee K, et al. What Works: Safe Motherhood. Policy Project, Washington: 2003, pp.
78–9.
6. Vitamin A is essential for normal maintenance and functioning of body tissues, for growth
and development, and a strong immune system. Although the increased vitamin A requirement
during pregnancy is small, in countries where vitamin A deficiency is endemic, women need
supplementation. Promoting Quality Maternal and Newborn Care: A Reference Manual for
Program Managers. (1998). Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere, Inc. (CARE),
Chapter 5.
LDHH S-1. Pregnant women/families/caregiver LDHH I-1. Percent of pregnant women and family who are able to state at least three danger signs of labor
know2 signs of complications during labor and and delivery***
delivery3: (Means of verification [MOV]: population-based survey; client or exit interviews)
1. Heavy bleeding
2. Labor longer than 12 hours LDHH I-2. Percent of caregivers who are able to state at least three danger signs of labor and delivery***
3. Convulsions (MOV: population-based survey; Community-based assessment [community assessment])
4. Pushing more than one hour
5. Malpresentation or head not down or baby’s LDHH I-3. Percent of pregnant women who arrive at the facility due to labor and delivery complications.
head is not coming first5 (MOV: HF records)
6. Fever, chills
7. Membranes ruptured6 for more than 12 hours
before labor
LDHH S-2. Pregnant women and their families have LDHH I-4. Percent of pregnant women and their families who have a birth plan that includes an emergency plan
a birth plan that includes an emergency plan7 (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interviews)
LDHH S-3. Pregnant women/families/caregivers use LDHH I-5. Percent of pregnant women and their families who are able to list basic clean birth practices
clean birth practices8: (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interviews)
Pregnant women/families: LDHH I-6. Percent of caregivers who are able to list basic clean birth practices
1. Clean surface (MOV: population-based survey; community assessment)
2. Clean cord to tie cord
3. Clean blade to cut cord LDHH I-7. Percent of recent mothers who report use of clean birth practices during her last delivery
4. Clean pads, cloths, and clothes for mother (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interviews)
5. Clean cloth to wrap baby LDHH I-8. Percent of caregivers who report use of clean birth practices in every birth during the last 12 months
Caregivers: (MOV: population-based survey; community assessment)
6. Clean hands, apron and gloves
35
Intervention Focus: Labor and Delivery [LD]
RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AND
STANDARDS OF CARE INDICATORS
HH Household Level1 (LDHH): The household prepares for a safe and clean birth, and has an emergency plan.
LDHH S-4. Pregnant women/their families/caregivers can assist the birth using LDHH I-9. Percent of pregnant women and their families who are able to list basic safe
safe practices: birth practices
1. Allow free position to women during labor and birth, but avoid flat on the (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interviews)
back
LDHH I-10. Percent of caregivers who are able to list basic safe birth practices
2. Allow the mother to eat and drink as she wants9
(MOV: population-based survey; community assessment)
3. Allow spontaneous pushing
4. Do not use any kind of uterotonic (tea, herbs, drugs10) LDHH I-11. Percent of recent mothers who report use of safe birth practices in her last
5. Make sure that the placenta comes out11 birth
6. Completely dry the newborn, then put the baby skin-to-skin on the abdomen (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interviews)
of the mother immediately after birth, and cover both12
LDHH I-12. Percent of caregivers who report use of safe birth practices in every birth
during the last 12 months
(MOV: population-based survey; community assessment)
LDHH S-5. Pregnant women/their families/caregivers know home-based life LDHH I-13. Percent pregnant women and their families who are able to describe emer-
saving skills (HBLSS)13 to provide emergency care in the home14. gency care in the home
1. Identify signs of complications (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interviews)
a) too much bleeding—call for help, rub womb, stimulate nipples or baby to
LDHH I-14. Percent of caregivers who can demonstrate emergency care in the home
breast, squat and pass urine, external massage and uterine compression,
(MOV: HF records)
apply pressure with cloth/pad to bleeding site, refer15
b) birth delay—squat and pass urine, position changes, fluids, refer16
c) swelling and fits—support to the mother during a convulsion, refer17
d) sickness with pain and fever—position semi-sitting, cover, 1 cup fluids
every hour, sponge bathe, paracetamol 1000mg every 6 hours, pass urine,
when baby has delivered then breastfeed every 2–3 hours, refer18
2. Safe referral (position lying down, warm, fluids, companion go to skilled
provider, tell what happened, what was done)19
36
Intervention Focus: Labor and Delivery [LD]
RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AND
STANDARDS OF CARE INDICATORS
Community Level (LDCL): Standards in addition to household level; The community supports families in efforts to ensure safe and clean deliv-
C
eries, and mobilizes around emergency plans.
LDCL S-1. Community is mobilized around an LDCL I-1. Percent of communities with an emergency transport plan in place
emergency finance scheme, emergency transport22 (MOV: HF records; community assessment survey)
scheme, and blood donor pool23, 24, 25 Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: Number of communities that have an emergency transport system;
Denominator: Number of communities
LDCL I-2. Percent of communities that have an emergency financing system
(MOV: HF records; community assessment)
LDCL I-3. Percent of communities that have a blood donor system
(MOV: HF records; community assessment)
LDCL I-4. Percent of communities that have used an emergency transport plan
(MOV: HF records; community assessment)
LDCL S-2. Apply LDHH S-1 to TBAs/CHWs/ LDCL I-5. Percent of TBAs/CHWs/skilled providers who are able to state at least three danger signs of
skilled providers labor and delivery***
(MOV: HF records; TBA survey)
LDCL S-3. Apply LDHH S-5 to TBAs/CHWs/ LDCL I-6. Percent of TBAs/CHWs/skilled providers who can demonstrate HBLSS (MOV: HF
skilled providers. records; TBA survey)
LDCL S-4. TBAs/CHWs/skilled providers are LDCL I-7. Percent of TBAs/CHWs/skilled providers who regularly meet with health facility staff
linked with health facilities to ensure timely/effi- (MOV: HF records)
cient referral of complications.26
37
Intervention Focus: Labor and Delivery [LD]
LDCL S-5. Apply LDHH S-3 to TBAs/CHWs/ LDCL I-7. Percent of TBAs/CHWs/skilled providers who regularly meet with health facility staff
skilled providers (MOV: HF records)
LDCL I-8. Percent of TBAs/CHWs/skilled providers who are able to list basic clean birth practices
(MOV: population-based survey; c. assessmt.)
LDCL I-9. Percent of TBAs/CHWs/skilled providers who report use of clean birth practices in every birth during
the last 12 months
(MOV: population-based survey; community assessment)
See also LDHH I-5 and LDHH I-7.
LDCL S-6. Apply LDHH S-4 to TBAs/CHWs/ LDCL I-10. Percent of TBAs/CHWs/skilled providers who are able to list basic safe birth practices
skilled providers (MOV: population-based survey; community assessment)
LDCL I-11. Percent of TBAs/CHWs/skilled providers who report use of safe birth practices in every birth
during the last 12 months
(MOV: population-based survey; community assessment)
See also LDHH I-9 and LDHH I-11.
38
Intervention Focus: Labor and Delivery [LD]
RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AND
STANDARDS OF CARE INDICATORS
First Level 27 (LDFL): Standards in addition to the above levels. Health facilities are staffed with skilled attendants and stocked with essential
1
supplies to ensure safe and clean deliveries. Health facilities work with communities to reduce delays in complication recognition and treatment.
LDFL S-1. Skilled attendants are able to identify and implement basic manage- LDFL I-1. Percent of health providers trained to identify and manage L&D complications
ment of labor and delivery complications according to the WHO guidelines28 (MOV: HF records)
1. Hemorrhage
LDFL I-2. Percent of pregnant women with L&D complications managed according to
2. Prolonged expulsive phase
protocols
3. Obstructed labor
(MOV: HF records)
4. Severe pre-eclampsia and eclampsia
5. Retained placenta/pieces LDFL I-3. Percent of women with obstetrical complications treated within two hours at a
6. Cervical tears health facility***
7. Hypovolemic shock (MOV: HF records; client or exit interview)
8. Sepsis
LDFL S-2. Health providers are able to use best practices to promote the nor- LDFL I-4. Percent of health providers who use best practices to promote normal labor
mal labor process: 29 process
1. Use partograph (MOV: HF records)
2. Encourage walking around (free ambulation)
3. Allow companion husband/family/friends as desired by the woman
4. Encourage the woman in labor to take any position she finds comfortable,
avoiding lying on her back30
5. Use natural ways to manage pain
6. Encourage the woman to drink nourishing fluids or water during labor
7. Encourage a woman in labor to pass urine every two hours
8. Avoid unnecessary interventions (enema, shave, routine IV fluids, excess
vaginal examination, routine episiotomy)
9. Encourage spontaneous pushing
10. Assure privacy, confidentiality/stigma
39
Intervention Focus: Labor and Delivery [LD]
RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AND
STANDARDS OF CARE INDICATORS
First Level 27 (LDFL): Standards in addition to the above levels. Health facilities are staffed with skilled attendants and stocked with essential
1
supplies to ensure safe and clean deliveries. Health facilities work with communities to reduce delays in complication recognition and treatment.
LDFL S-3. Health facilities with equipment and supplies available for EOC31 LDFL I-5. Percent of EOC facilities that:
during L&D according to protocols: a) have equipment and supplies; and
1. Use partograph b) use protocols
2. Normal birth (MOV: HFA; HF records)
3. Perform active management of third stage of labor32
4. Perform manual removal of retained placenta/pieces LDFL I-6. Number of facilities per 500,000 population providing essential obstetric
5. Perform assisted vaginal delivery (vacuum extraction or forceps) functions***
6. Administer antibiotics, anticonvulsants, and uterotonics IM or IV and IV (MOV: HFA)
fluids or blood transfusions LDFL I-7. Percent of health providers trained in the practice of active management of
7. Cesarean surgical resolution if needed third stage of labor
(MOV: HF records)
LDFL I-8. Percent of vaginal deliveries documented as having active third stage manage-
ment of labor
(MOV: HF records)
LDFL I-9. Percent of pregnant women with obstetric complications treated in EOC
facilities***
(MOV: HF records)
LDFL S-4. Proactive activities during labor and delivery to prevent maternal-to- LDFL I-10. Percent of health providers trained in PMTCT
child transmission (PMTCT) of HIV during labor and delivery: (MOV: HF records)
1. Avoid rupture of membranes before the birth
LDFL I-11. Percent of HIV-positive women who received appropriate treatment in labor,
2. Avoid vaginal examinations
according to PMTCT recommendations
3. Promote vaginal delivery
(MOV: HF records)
4. Use universal precautions
5. Education on breastfeeding options LDFL I-12. Percent of previously untested women in labor who received appropriate
6. Give anti-retroviral medication (per specific drug and country protocol) counseling and testing for HIV/AIDS
(MOV: HF records)
40
Intervention Focus: Labor and Delivery [LD]
RECOMMENDED PRACTICES AND
STANDARDS OF CARE INDICATORS
First Level 27 (LDFL): Standards in addition to the above levels. Health facilities are staffed with skilled attendants and stocked with essential
1
supplies to ensure safe and clean deliveries. Health facilities work with communities to reduce delays in complication recognition and treatment.
LDFL S-5. Health facilities have maternal and neonatal clinical records in place, LDFL I-13. Percent of health facilities that maintain complete maternal records
including labor and delivery information (process, outcome, interventions and (MOV: HFA)
treatment if needed)
LDFL S-6. Health facilities have a referral and answer system functioning LDFL I-14. Percent of health facilities that have a referral and answer system in place
(MOV: HFA)
LDFL I-15. Percent of health facilities that have record of referrals and answer (counter-
referral)
(MOV: HFA)
LDFL I-16. Percent of health facilities that have a method for eliciting/seeking community
input re: labor and delivery services
(MOV: HFA)
LDFL I-17. Percent of health facilities that have met with community committee or key
community group/member(s) during past 3 months
(MOV: HF records)
LDFL I-18. Percent of health facilities that have program/plan to reach community with
information about birth planning, danger signs, and referral
(MOV: HFA)
41
Intervention Focus: Labor and Delivery [LD]
LDSL S-1. Health facilities with equipment and supplies available for emergency LDSL I-1. Percent of cesarean sections 35**
obstetric care (EmOC34) during L&D according to protocols, which include
Also see LDFL I-6 and I-9.
1. EOC in addition to
2. Surgery
3. Anesthesia
4. Blood replacement
42
Endnotes
1. Household level is defined as the mother of the baby, her family and helpers providing first aid
in the home or during referral. Buffington, S., Sibley, L., Beck, D., Armbruster, D. (2004). Home
Based Life Saving. Guidelines for Decision Makers and Trainers. American College of Nurse-
Midwives, Silver Spring, MD, USA.
2. “Know” refers to the percentage that can spontaneously name at least the primary warning
signs of specific obstetric complications . . . Bertrand, Jane, T. and Gabriela Escudero August
2002, Compendium of Indicators for Evaluating Reproductive Health Programs, MEASURE
Evaluation Series, No. 6, p. 293.
3. Some problems can be prevented if the woman/family understand what actions to do.
Sometimes it is not easy to tell when a problem is going to happen. The labor may be too long
when the baby is not in a head-down position, the baby is too big to come out, something
blocks or stops the baby from coming out, the mother is too weak and tired, the mother has no
strength to push, the womb is too weak and tired, the birth pains are not strong. Buffington, S.,
Sibley, L., Beck, D., Armbruster, D. (2004). Home Based Life Saving. Guidelines for Decision
Makers and Trainers. Community Meetings 3 and 4. American College of Nurse-Midwives,
Silver Spring, MD, USA.
See also: Promoting Quality Maternal and Newborn Care, CARE, 1998, Chapter 5, pg. 5.31
4. “It is not normal to bleed too much after birth. When the bleeding is any amount of continuous
bleeding, or large fist-sized clots, or the woman has weakness and fainting, it is very serious.”
Home Based Life Saving Skills Community Meeting 5, p. 26.
5. If the baby’s head IS down, the birth is more likely to go well. If the baby’s head IS NOT down,
the birth may be difficult. It is safer for the mother and her baby to give birth at a facility with
trained staff. Burns, A.A., Lovich, R., Maxwell, J., Shapiro, K., (1997). Where Women Have
Not Doctor: A Health Guide for Women. The Hesperian Foundation, Berkeley, CA, USA.
6. If at all possible, it is best to go to a referral facility as soon as possible. “. . . rupture of
membranes can increase chances of infection, increase the difficulty of the labor for mother
and baby, and increase risk of mother-to-child transmission of HIV . . . if bag ruptures
spontaneously . . . delivery should occur in less than 4 hours.” Israel, E., and Kroeger, M. 2003.
Integrating Prevention of Mother-to-Child HIV Transmission into Existing Maternal, Child, and
Reproductive Health Programs. Technical Guidance Series. Pathfinder International. Watertown.
7. “. . . planning for childbirth is important because the window of opportunity to treat women
and newborns is short. Reducing the four delays to accessing and receiving services can make
the difference between life and death. It is important to encourage women and their families to
think about the practical aspects of seeking obstetric services prior to an emergency.” Promoting
Quality Maternal and Newborn Care, CARE, 1998, Chapter 5, pg. 5.36
8. Minimum clean birth things at home: 1. Clean surface, 2. Clean cord to tie cord, 3. Clean
blade to cut cord, 4. Clean pads, cloths, and clothes for mother, 5. Clean cloth to wrap baby, 6.
Caregivers: Clean hands, apron and gloves. Buffington, S., Sibley, L., Beck, D., Armbruster, D.
(2004). Home Based Life Saving Skills Community Meetings 3 and 4, and Beck, D., Buffington,
S., McDermott, J., Berney, K. (1998). Healthy Mother Healthy Newborn Care. Both are
publications of American College of Nurse-Midwives, Silver Spring, MD USA.
9. “Adequate food and drink during labor is advised to improve fetal outcomes and maternal well-
being.” Gay J, Hardee K, et al. What Works: Safe Motherhood. Policy Project, Washington:
2003, p. 171.
10. “Uterotonic drugs include: oxytocin, ergometrin, prostaglandin and misoprostol.” Basic
Maternal and Newborn Care: A Guide for Skilled Providers. JHPIEGO (2004). Table 3-3
Uterotonic Drugs, p. 3–106.
HH
Household Level (PPHH): The HOUSEHOLD2 prepares for the postpartum period and is ready for complications, including accessing essential
and emergency care, identifying danger signs, and establishing a supportive environment for the postpartum woman.
PPHH S-1. Women/families “know”3 danger signs PPHH I-1. Percent of women/ family members who are able to name three danger signs after delivery***
after delivery (Means of verification [MOV]: population-based survey; ANC client or exit interviews)
1. Heavy bleeding (any amount of continuous
PPHH I-2. Percent of women/families who self refer to health facility for postpartum complications
bleeding, or large fist-sized clots, or the woman
(MOV: HF records)
has weakness and fainting)
2. Loss of consciousness
3. Placenta not delivered within 30 minutes after
delivery
4. Fever with or without chills
5. Foul smelling discharge
6. Convulsions/rigidity
7. Headache, visual disturbances
8. No urine output in first eight hours
9. Severe abdominal pain
PPHH S-2. Mothers/caregivers practice postpartum PPHH I-3. Percent of women/caregivers counseled in postpartum cleanliness/hygiene (MOV: ANC client or exit
cleanliness/hygiene.5 interviews)
PPHH S-3. Infants are immediately breastfed in the PPHH I-4. Percent of women/ families who can state two benefits of exclusive breastfeeding for six months
first hour. Infants are exclusively breastfed for six (MOV: population-based survey; ANC or PPC client or exit interview)
months (no food or drink other than breast milk).6
PPHH I-5. Percent of children aged 0–23 months who were breastfed within the first hour after birth*
(MOV: population-based survey)
PPHH I-6. Percent of infants who were exclusively breastfed in the last 24 hours***
(MOV: population-based survey)7
PPHH I-7. Percent of mothers who can name at least two benefits of initiating breastfeeding within one hour
postpartum
(MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interview)
47
Intervention Focus: Postpartum Care1 [PP]
HH
Household Level (PPHH): The HOUSEHOLD2 prepares for the postpartum period and is ready for complications, including accessing essential
and emergency care, identifying danger signs, and establishing a supportive environment for the postpartum woman.
PPHH S-4. Women/families have an emergency PPHH I-8. Percent of women/families with an emergency plan
plan8: (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interview)
• Know which facility to go to if a
complication arises
• Know how to get to that facility/plan for
transport
• Have money saved or access to a community
fund
PPHH S-5. All postpartum women are counseled PPHH I-9. Percent of women/families who can state at least two benefits of birth spacing
regarding family planning options.9, 10 (MOV: HF records; client or exit interviews)
PPHH I-10. Percent of mothers who use a method of family planning that does not interfere with breastfeeding
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records; client or exit interviews)
PPHH I-11. Percent of postpartum mothers who report initiating use of a modern method of FP within six
weeks after birth**
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records)
PPHH I-12. Percent of women who report at least one place where she can obtain a method of family planning*
(MOV: population-based survey)
PPHH I-13. Percent of children aged 0–23 months who were born at least 24 months after the previous surviv-
ing child*
(MOV: population-based survey)
PPHH I-14. Percent of mothers with infants less than six months who report using LAM11**
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records)
48
Intervention Focus: Postpartum Care1 [PP]
HH
Household Level (PPHH): The HOUSEHOLD2 prepares for the postpartum period and is ready for complications, including accessing essential
and emergency care, identifying danger signs, and establishing a supportive environment for the postpartum woman.
PPHH S-6. Postpartum mothers and newborns PPHH I-15. Percent of women/families who can state two benefits of postpartum care
receive postpartum care12 at appropriate intervals (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; client or exit interviews)
from skilled personnel13:
• Every 15 minutes for one hour and every 30 PPHH I-16. Percent of mothers and newborns who received postpartum care at each recommended inter-
minutes for two hours after delivery ; then at: val from skilled personnel***
• Six hours (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; client or exit interviews)
• One day
• Six days Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: number of women attended at each postpartum interval by skilled
• Six weeks personnel; Denominator: number of live births
• Six months
PPHH S-7. Postpartum mothers take appropriate PPHH I-17. Percent of women/families who can state one benefit of postpartum iron supplementation
micronutrient supplementation: (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interviews)
• All postpartum women take vitamin A supple-
PPHH I-18. Percent of women/families who can state one benefit of vitamin A for postpartum mother or baby
mentation within six weeks as per recommen-
(MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interviews)
dations.15
• Iron/folate16 PPHH I-19. Percent of anemic postpartum women who took one to two tablets of 60 mg essential iron daily for
three to six months postpartum
(MOV: HF records)
PPHH I-20. Percent of postpartum women who took 200,000 IU vitamin A supplementation within six weeks of
delivery
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records)
49
Intervention Focus: Postpartum Care1 [PP]
PPCL S-1. Community is mobilized for emergency PPCL I-1. Percent of communities that have an emergency transport system (MOV: HF records; commu-
finance scheme, emergency transport scheme, and nity assessment )
blood donor pool.17 Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: Number of communities that have an emergency transport system;
Denominator: Number of communities
PPCL S-2. Community is mobilized (TBAs, CHWs, PPCL I-4. Percent of TBAs/CHWs/community members who can state two benefits of postpartum care
and other community members) for complication (MOV: HF records; community assessment)
readiness and education including:
PPCL I-5. Percent TBAs/CHWs/community members who can name four danger signs for the woman
• Recognize and respond to danger signs in
(MOV: HF records; community assessment)
mother and newborn
• Obstetric first aid care in order to stabilize the PPCL I-6. Number of TBAs/CHWs/community members trained in obstetric first aid
woman or newborn with a complication until (MOV: project or HF records)
reaching trained health worker18
• Encourage postpartum visits PPCL I-7. Percent of women with postpartum complications at home who received obstetric first aid from
• Support consumption of iron and vitamin A trained TBA/community member
supplements (when necessary) (MOV: HF records)
• Support family planning choice PPCL I-8. Percent of trained TBAs/CHWs who can state at least two reasons why breastfeeding should be ini-
• Support chosen infant feeding method19 tiated within one hour postpartum
• PMTCT (in HIV/AIDS-affected areas), specifi- (MOV: HF records; program records; community assessment)
cally infant feeding counseling and breast care
information Also see PPHH I-1 – I-15.
• Linking with health facilities for referral,
advice, and support
See other services in endnotes20,21.
50
Intervention Focus: Postpartum Care1 [PP]
PPFL S-1. Health workers provide comprehensive PPFL I-1. Percent of health workers trained in postpartum care
postpartum care: (MOV: HFA; HF records)
• Support mother/family
PPFL I-2. Percent of health workers trained to provide postpartum breastfeeding support, counseling, and
• Diagnose and treat complications, including
management of breastfeeding complications
prevention of vertical transmission of diseases
(MOV: HF records)
from mother to infant (e.g. HIV; specifically
infant feeding counseling and breast care) PPFL I-3. Percent of women receiving postpartum breastfeeding counseling and support from health workers
• Refer mother and infant for specialist care (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; client or exit interviews)
when necessary
• Screen and provide counseling and referrals PPFL I-4. Percent of health facilities with no stock-outs of essential supplies in the last quarter27
for GBV and protection from environmental (MOV: HFA)
hazards PPFL I-5. Percent of health facilities with policy of initiating breastfeeding within one hour postpartum
• Encourage use of ITN (where appropriate) (MOV: HFA)
• Counsel on baby care
• Counsel/support breastfeeding PPFL I-6. Percent of health workers who know how to prevent and manage postpartum complications
• Counsel on maternal nutrition and provide (MOV: HFA; HF records)
supplementation (Iron and vitamin A) PPFL I-7. Percent of postpartum complications managed correctly according to protocols
• Counsel and provide contraception (MOV: HF records)
• Counsel on cleanliness and hygiene
PPFL I-8. Percent maternal deaths occurring in postpartum period
(MOV: HF records)
PPFL I-9. Percent of facilities screening for GBV in non-judgmental manner
(MOV: HFA/checklist JHPIEGO/ IPPF)
PPFL I-10. Percent of clients satisfied with services provided
(MOV: client satisfaction survey; client exit interviews)
PPFL I-11. Percent of facilities exhibiting gender sensitivity28 in the service delivery environment***
(MOV: HFA)
Also see PPHH I-5; I-14; I-17; I-18
51
Intervention Focus: Postpartum Care1 [PP]
PPFL S-2. Emergency equipment and supplies are PPFL I-12. Percent of health facilities with no stock-outs of emergency supplies31 during the previous
available.29 Protocols for management of postpar- quarter
tum emergencies are available30 (MOV: HFA)
PPFL I-13. Percent of facilities with equipment and supplies available for postpartum emergencies
(MOV: HFA)
PPFL I-14. Percent of all women with major obstetric complications who are treated in EOC facilities in a
given reference period***
(MOV: HF records)32
PPFL I-15. Percent of postpartum complications managed correctly according to protocols
(MOV: HF records)
PPFL S-3. Health facilities provide a range of con- PPFL I-16. Number of family planning methods available at nearest service delivery point
traceptive methods.33, 34 (MOV: HFA)
PPFL I-17. Percent of women who, PRIOR to discharge from health facility after birth of baby, receive coun-
seling on family planning and where/how to obtain contraceptive methods
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records; client or exit interview)
PPFL I-18. No stock-outs of family planning methods in the last quarter
(MOV: HFA)
PPFL I-19. Percent of health facilities with both hormonal and non-hormonal methods of family planning
available
(MOV: HFA)
PPFL I-20. Percent of women who are discharged from facility with family planning method
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records; client or exit interview)
52
Intervention Focus: Postpartum Care1 [PP]
PPFL S-4. All women delivered in health PPFL I-21. Percent of health facilities with policy of monitoring women for at least 24 hours postpartum
facilities are monitored for at least 24 hours (MOV: HFA)
postpartum 35, 36
PPFL I-22. Percent of women delivered in health facilities who are monitored for at least 24 hours
postpartum
(MOV: HF records)
PPFL S-5. Postpartum care providers link to PPFL I-23. Percent of postpartum service sites that have a method for eliciting/seeking community input re:
community networks, and work with community, postpartum services
providing information about family planning and (MOV: HFA)
building capacity for activities listed in PPCL S-2.
PPFL I-24. Percent of postpartum service sites that have met with community committee or key community
group/member(s) during past three months
(MOV: HF records)
PPFL I-25. Percent of postpartum service sites that have program/plan to reach community with information
about postpartum danger signs, breastfeeding support, and family planning
(MOV: HFA)
Also see PPCL I-4 – I-8.
53
Intervention Focus: Postpartum Care1 [PP]
PPSL S-1. Reduce delays in receiving treatment: PPSL I-1. Percent of health facilities with skilled attendant (doctor, nurse or midwife) available 24 hours
• Health workers skilled in providing care for per day, seven days per week
pregnant women with signs of a complication (MOV: HFA)
of pregnancy37
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: number of health facilities with skilled attendant (doctor, nurse or
• Essential drugs38 for complications during
midwife) available 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Denominator: number of health facilities
pregnancy available in facilities
• Skilled and informed workers available
24 hours a day, seven days a week for Also see PPFL I-1 – I-26
complications
Also see PPFL S-1 – S-5
54
Endnotes
1. The ‘postpartum period’ begins after delivery of the placenta and lasts until six weeks after
delivery. Postpartum care includes prevention/early detection and treatment of complications
and disease, and provision of advice/services in breastfeeding, birth spacing, immunization and
maternal nutrition.
“ Technically, the postpartum period refers only to the first 6 weeks following birth. Returning
the body to a true non-pregnant state takes longer than 6 weeks. This longer duration is
sometimes referred to as the extended postpartum period and may last 6 months or more.”
Varney H, Kriebs J, Gegor C, Varney’s Midwifery, 4th Edition (2004) p.214, Jones & Bartlett.
2. “An important element of routine postpartum care is monitoring of the mother and the
newborn. Most postpartum deaths occur within the first 24 hours . . . Early detection, referral,
and treatment of maternal infection or hemorrhage are essential. Postpartum care includes
the promotion and provision of family planning methods appropriate to lactation, as well as
breastfeeding support as needed. Education about hygiene, rest, nutrition, and infant care will
assist the mother in feeling more secure in tending to her new infant. In settings with maternal
night blindness prevalence > 5% or documented vitamin A deficiency in children, high-dose
VA should be given to mothers within the first eight weeks after delivery (and within six weeks
if the mother is not exclusively or fully breastfeeding). Counseling on continued or initiation
of sleeping under ITNs is important for postpartum women in malaria endemic areas. Daily
maternal iron/folate supplementation should continue in the postpartum period for three
months in areas where anemia prevalence in pregnant women is >40%. In areas with <40%
anemia prevalence in pregnant women, if women have not completed six months of daily
iron/folate supplement consumption during pregnancy, they should continue in the postpartum
period until they have consumed the full amount of 180 tablets.” CSTS+ Technical Reference
Materials: Maternal and Newborn Care. 2004: p.15.
“. . . need to assure early continuing care and monitoring (immediate postpartum period up to
4–6 hours; again 1 day postpartum, and within the first week for mom and second week for
baby….The first several days after birth are important to get at any complications arising from
antenatal and intrapartum concerns and management.” Comments of Donna Vivio, Deputy
Director, Maternal and Neonatal Health, JHPIEGO; 9/28/04
3. Household level is defined as the mother of the baby, her family and helpers providing first aid
in the home or during referral. Buffington, S., Sibley, L., Beck, D., Armbruster, D. (2004). Home
Based Life Saving Skills. Guidelines for Decision Makers and Trainers: Protocols. American
College of Nurse-Midwives, Silver Spring, MD, U.S.A.
NCHH S-1. Mother/family members know and can NCHH I-1. Percent of mothers/family members who can state at least three danger signs.**
name newborn danger signs4, 5: (Means of verification [MOV]: population-based survey; client or exit interviews)
• trouble breathing
• poor suck or is not able to suck
• feels hot or cold
• pus or redness any place on the baby: eyes, cord
stump, skin
• fits, rigid, stiff, floppy
• born too small
• poor skin color: pale, blue, yellow
NCHH S-2. Mother /family members practice NCHH I-2. Percent of mothers/family members who can name three essential newborn care practices
essential newborn care:6 (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interviews)
Warming baby: NCHH I-3. Percent of children aged 0-23 months who were immediately breastfed at birth*
• Drying7 and8 (MOV: population-based survey)
• Wrap baby, including head
• Skin to skin contact to maintain warmth Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: Number of children breastfed within the first hour after birth;
• Delay bathing for 24 hours9 Denominator: Number of children aged 0–23 months
Clean cord care: NCHH I-4. Percent of children aged 0–23 months who were placed with the mother immediately after birth*
• Secure cord tie with clean ties (MOV: population-based survey; HF or TBA/CHW records)
• Clean cord cut
• Keep cord dry NCHH I-5. Percent of children aged 0–23 months whose delivery involved use of a clean birth kit or whose
• Put nothing on it cord was cut with a new razor*
(MOV: population-based survey; HF or TBA/CHW records)
Initiating immediate breastfeeding10
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: Number of children aged 0–23 months whose delivery involved use of a
Kangaroo care for low birth-weight (LBW)
clean birth kit or whose cord was cut with a new razor; Denominator: Number of children aged 0–23 months
babies11
NCHH I-6. Percent of newborns with delayed bathing
(MOV: population-based survey; HF or TBA/CHW records)
61
Intervention Focus: Newborn Care1 [NC]
62
Intervention Focus: Newborn Care1 [NC]
63
Intervention Focus: Newborn Care1 [NC]
NCFL S-1. Maternity facilities are “Baby- NCFL I-1. Percent of facilities that are designated “Baby Friendly”**
Friendly”22: (MOV: HFA)
1. Written breastfeeding policy for all health care NCFL I-2. Percent of facilities with a delivery room adequately equipped for newborn care
staff (MOV: HFA)
2. Train all health care staff in skills necessary to
implement policy NCFL I-3. Percent of pregnant women informed about breastfeeding benefits
3. Inform all pregnant women about breastfeed- (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interview)
ing and LAM NCFL I-4. Percent of delivered women shown how to breastfeed
4. Help mothers initiate breastfeeding within an (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interview)
hour of birth
5. Show mothers how to breastfeed and how to NCFL I-5. Percent of women shown how to maintain lactation
maintain lactation23 (MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interview)
6. Give newborn infants no food or drink other
NCFL I-6. Percent of women who report that they were helped to initiate breastfeeding
than breast milk
(MOV: population-based survey; client or exit interview)
7. Practice “rooming in” 24 hours a day
8. Kangaroo care for low birth-weight (LBW) NCFL I-7. Percent of newborns who had kangaroo care
babies
9. Encourage breastfeeding on demand Also see NCHH I-3, I-4, and I-10.
10. Give no artificial teats, or pacifiers to breast-
feeding infants
11. Foster breastfeeding support groups and refer
mothers to them
64
Intervention Focus: Newborn Care1 [NC]
NCFL S-2. Skilled health workers24 provide essen- NCFL I-8. Percent of staff skilled in management of birth asphyxia
tial components of normal newborn care25, 26: (MOV: HFA)
1. Clean delivery and cord care, NCFL I-9. Percent of staff skilled in eye care and immunization
2. Thermal protection to prevent newborn hypo/ (MOV: HFA)
hyperthermia,
3. Early (started within 1 hour of birth) and NCFL I-10. Percent of staff skilled in sepsis management
exclusive breastfeeding, unless HIV+ mother (MOV: HFA)
has decided otherwise NCFL I-11. Percent of staff skilled in low birth-weight management
4. Identification and management of birth (MOV: HFA)
asphyxia (including initiation of breathing
and resuscitation), sepsis27, 28 and low birth NCFL I-12. Percent of sepsis treatment and resuscitation managed according to protocols
weight29 (MOV: HF records)
5. Eye care to prevent and manage ophthalmia
NCFL I-13. Percent of newborns monitored for at least 24 hours
neonatorum
(MOV: HF, TBA/CHW records)
6. HIV antiretroviral given to HIV+ mother
(according to drug and country protocol) Also see NCFL I-3 and I-6.
7. Immunizations BCG, OPV, Hepatitis B accord-
ing to country protocol, monitor for danger
signs as listed above
8. Monitor newborn for at least 24 hours
65
Intervention Focus: Newborn Care1 [NC]
NCFL S-3. Provide to all delivered women using NCFL I-14. Percent of staff trained in HIV35:
country HIV protocol30: • Prevention
1. Counseling and testing31 • Counseling and testing
2. Information on how to avoid sexual • Treatment
transmission of HIV (MOV: HF records)
Provide HIV information32 to HIV-positive deliv- NCFL I-15. Percent of delivered women receiving HIV PMTCT and prevention information
ered women using country HIV protocol: (MOV: population-based survey; HF records; client or exit interview)
1. Feeding options33 of safety, availability,34 NCFL I-16. Percent of HIV-positive delivered women receiving PMTCT (ART, BF and prevention counsel-
and affordability, ing, etc.) and prevention information
2. Treat with anti-retroviral drugs, if appropriate (MOV: HF records)
and feasible/country HIV protocol
3. Teach how to avoid sexual transmission of
HIV
NCFL S-4. Newborn care providers link to com- NCFL I-17. Percent of health facilities that have met with community committee or key community group/
munity networks, and work with community to member(s) during past three months
build capacity to recognize newborn danger signs, (MOV: HF records)
give first aid, and refer to a health facility.
NCFL I-18. Percent of health facilities that have program/plan to reach community with information about
newborn danger signs and breastfeeding support
(MOV: HFA)
66
Intervention Focus: Newborn Care1 [NC]
NCSL S-4. Newborn care providers link to first- NCSL I-1. Percent of second-level health facilities that have program/plan to reach first-level health facilities
level referral facilities to build capacity to recog- with information about newborn danger signs, first aid, appropriate referral to higher level
nize newborn danger signs, give first aid, and refer (MOV: MOH)
to second level health facility appropriately
NCSL S-5. Infants of HIV-positive mothers receive NCSL I-2. Percent of newborns of HIV-positive mothers who receive anti-retrovirals per country protocol
antiretrovirals per country protocol (MOV: HR records)
67
Endnotes
1. Newborn refers to a baby between birth and one month of age. MAQ Exchange: Reproductive
Health and HIV Presentations.
2. Household level is defined as the mother of the baby, her family and helpers providing first aid
in the home or during referral. Buffington, S., Sibley, L., Beck, D., Armbruster, D. (2004). Home
Based Life Saving: Guidelines for Decision Makers and Trainers. American College of Nurse-
Midwives, Silver Spring, MD USA.
3. “Know” refers to the percentage who can spontaneously name the warning/danger signs of
newborn complications. Bertrand, Jane, T. and Gabriela Escudero August 2002, Compendium
of Indicators for Evaluating Reproductive Health Programs, MEASURE Evaluation Series,
Volume Two, Indicators for Specific Programmatic Areas, p. 318.
4. Pregnancy, Childbirth, Postpartum and Newborn Care: A Guide for Essential Practice. World
Health Organization, 2003, p. J7.
5. Home Based Life Saving Skills. Community Meeting 2. American College of Nurse-Midwives,
Washington, D.C. USA.
6. Essential newborn care practices for home birth: 1. Breathing observation: person skilled in
mouth suction for newborn resuscitation and newborn problem identification. 2. Warmth: dry
baby and place skin to skin with mother, clean cloths to keep warm, delay bathing of baby
for at least 24 hours, 3. Cord care: clamping/tying, cutting, air dry. 4. Prophylactic eye care:
wipe with clean and dry cloth, antibiotic drops per local protocol. 5. Immediate breastfeeding.
Buffington, S., Sibley, L., Beck, D., Armbruster, D. (2004). Home Based Life Saving Community
Meeting 3. American College of Nurse-Midwives, Silver Spring, MD USA. and Promoting
Quality Maternal and Newborn Care: A Reference Manual for Program Managers. (1998).
Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere, Inc. (CARE), Chapter 5.
7. Blood on newborn is not a risk to newborn, but is a risk to caregiver. MAQ Exchange:
Reproductive Health and HIV Presentations
8. Do not separate mother and newborn. Leave newborn skin-to-skin with mother. In areas
with high HIV prevalence, consider bathing newborn earlier to reduce risk of maternal-fetal
transmission, and to reduce risk to caregiver. MAQ Exchange: Reproductive Health and HIV
Presentations.
9. Buffington, S., Sibley, L., Beck, D., Armbruster, D. (2004). Home Based Life Saving Basic
Information. American College of Nurse-Midwives, Silver Spring, MD USA, p.72.
10. “During the first two months of life, babies who are not breastfed have a six times greater risk
of dying from infections . . . ” WHO Collaborative Study Team. On the role of breastfeeding on
the prevention of infant mortality. Effect of Breastfeeding on infant and child mortality due to
infectious diseases in less developed countries: A pooled analysis. Lancet. 2000; 355: 451–455.
11. Low birth-weight care includes: Adequate breast milk and warmth can substantially reduce
mortality (CARE), keep baby warm and dry and with mother, breastfeed frequently; if the
baby can not suck—express breast milk and use a cup to feed the baby. It takes a devoted
mother/family and staff to help this baby survive. Staff go with mother/family to second level
referral site. Promoting Quality Maternal and Newborn Care: A Reference Manual for Program
Managers. (1998). Cooperative for Assistance and Relief Everywhere, Inc. (CARE), Chapter
5 and Beck, D., Buffington, S., McDermott, J., Berney, K. (1998). Healthy Mother Healthy
Newborn Care. American College of Nurse-Midwives, Washington, D.C. USA.
Pre-conception/Inter-conception:
PCHH I-1. Percent of boys and girls age 0–23 months who are underweight (–2 SD from the
median weight-for-age, according to the WHO/NCHS reference population)*
(MOV: population-based survey)
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: Number of children age 0–23 months whose weight
is –2 SD from the median weight of the WHO/NCHS reference population for their age;
Denominator: Number of children age 0–23 months in the survey who were weighed (If
there is reason to believe that girls are fed differently than boys, then compute a ratio of
malnutrition [girls to boys] using the data collected)
PCHH I-16. Percent of WRA who have completed at least four years of schooling**
(MOV: population-based survey)
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: #of women ages 15–49 who completed four years of
schooling; Denominator: Total # of women ages 15–49
This indicator measures the percent of women ages 15–49 who have completed at least a
primary level of education. For different countries, primary education may vary from four
years to eight to ten years.
Antenatal:
ACHH I-3. Percent of mothers of children aged 0–23 months in catchment area that saw a
skilled provider three or more times during last pregnancy*
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records)
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: number of mothers of children aged 0–23 months
in catchment area that saw a skilled provider three or more times during last pregnancy.
Denominator: number of mothers of children aged 0–23 months.
ACFL I-4. Percent of mothers with children age 0–23 months who received at least two
tetanus toxoid injections before the birth of their youngest child*
(MOV: population-based survey)
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: number of mothers with children age 0–23 months
who received at least two tetanus toxoid injections before the birth of her youngest child
(confirmed by maternal health card). Denominator: Number of mothers with children age
0–23 months.
ACSL I-7. Percent of health facilities with skilled attendant (doctor, nurse or midwife) avail-
able 24 hours per day, seven days per week
(MOV: HFA)
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: number of health facilities with skilled attendant
(doctor, nurse or midwife) available 24 hours per day, seven days per week. Denominator:
number of health facilities.
Postpartum:
PPHH I-16. Percent of mothers and newborns who received postpartum care at each recom-
mended interval from skilled personnel***
(MOV: population-based survey; HF records; client or exit interviews)
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: number of women attended at each postpartum inter-
val by skilled personnel; Denominator: number of live births
PPSL I-1. Percent of health facilities with skilled attendant (doctor, nurse or midwife) avail-
able 24 hours per day, seven days per week
(MOV: HFA)
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: number of health facilities with skilled attendant
(doctor, nurse or midwife) available 24 hours per day, seven days per week; Denominator:
number of health facilities
Newborn Care:
NCHH I-3. Percent of children aged 0–23 months who were immediately breastfed at birth*
(MOV: population-based survey)
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: Number of children breastfed within the first hour
after birth; Denominator: Number of children aged 0–23 months
NCHH I-5. Percent of children aged 0–23 months whose delivery involved use of a clean
birth kit or whose cord was cut with a new razor*
(MOV: population-based survey; HF or TBA/CHW records)
Key Indicator Definition: Numerator: Number of children aged 0–23 months whose deliv-
ery involved use of a clean birth kit or whose cord was cut with a new razor; Denominator:
Number of children aged 0–23 months
A
ppendix II presents an overview of designing programs for maternal and newborn
health. Topics include using frameworks in program design, program planning, sta-
tus analysis/needs assessments, and selecting indicators. Basic information about the
causes of maternal and newborn mortality and the evidence-based interventions that address
these causes is provided. There is also a brief discussion about skilled birth attendants and
HIV/AIDS. Additional resources are listed at the end of the Appendix in the Essential
References.
A. Results Framework
USAID, many of its CAs, and USAID-supported NGOs are familiar with, and use, the
Results Framework. In Results Framework terminology, the objectives are stated as desired
results. The main objective is referred to as a Strategic Objective (SO), and the lower-level
or dependent objectives are referred to as Intermediate Results (IRs). The causal relationship
between the IRs and SO is direct and clear: the lower level results must be achieved in order
for the SO to be realized.
An excellent explanation of the Results Framework and examples are found in Health
and Family Planning Indicators: A Tool for Results Frameworks, Vol. 1 prepared by the
Office of Sustainable Development for the Africa Bureau at USAID on the following web-
site: http://www.dec.org/pdf_docs/PNACM806.pdf. Save the Children/USA, an international
NGO, has adopted the generic framework in A Tool for Results Frameworks as the basis for
designing its reproductive health programs (see Figure 1).
According to a Senior Reproductive Health Advisor at Save the Children, most successful
health programs can be shown to be a result of improving/increasing access, quality, interest
and knowledge for services (formerly referred to as ‘demand’), and improving the social and
policy environment. The SO and IRs are typically refined for specific programs.
IR3:
IR1: Increased
IR4:
Increased IR2: knowledge of,
Improved social
access/ Increased improved attitudes
and policy
availability of quality of toward, and
environment
health health services acceptance of
services/supplies key services and
behavior
Source: CARE’s Guide for the Use of Maternal and Newborn Health Planning Tools prepared by
Susan Rae Ross.
The point is that no matter what framework or system an NGO or program planner uses
to design a program, what matters is that the program is designed with 1) clear goals and
objectives, 2) the ‘causal’ pathway linking activities and objectives is carefully considered
and the linkages between them are clearly laid out in the project plan.
80
(Processes) (Outputs) (Outcomes/Effects) Goal (Impact)
Plan and implement BCC strategy, Community members with Increased use of birth planning
including development and increased knowledge of and and preparation to deal with
dissemination of IEC materials (with support for birth planning and obstetric emergencies
an emphasis on birth planning) recognition of danger signs
Develop and implement community Community plans in place for Increased use of community
support systems (transportation/ supporting women and their support for seeking EmOC when
pregnancy and monitoring/ savings families during an obstetric required
& loans for emergency care) emergency
Develop protocols and train Providers with the skills required Increase in the proportion of Decrease in Case
facility-based providers to manage managing obstetric emergencies in appropriately managed obstetric Fatality Rate in
obstetric emergencies accordance with protocols cases facilities
Situational Analysis
• Review the context of maternal/neonatal health in regards to the overall devel-
opment conditions in the local situation
• Design and collect primary data, in consultation with communities and provid-
ers, both qualitative (for example, verbal autopsies, Participatory Learning
Appraisal (PLA)) and quantitative (i.e., Knowledge, Attitudes, Practices (KAP))
• Review secondary data, both qualitative and quantitative
• Conduct an environmental assessment (assess what other organizations are
doing, donor priorities and NGO’s strengths)
• Select potential project areas based on objective criteria
• Begin discussions regarding potential partnerships
Project Design
• Analysis of data for the development of major program strategies
• Project design including an analytical framework (e.g., results framework,
logframe, etc.) selection of evidenced based interventions, a monitoring and
evaluation plan
• Donor approval/ Government endorsement/ Community commitment
Project Implementation
• Implementation and monitoring, in partnership, of selected interventions and
their relevant output and effect indicators, with a feedback mechanism to pro-
vide refinement throughout implementation
• Mid-term Evaluation, focusing on process indicators, and development of a
plan to adjust implementation, as required
• Ongoing documentation and dissemination of lesions learned, both successes
and failures
• Final Evaluation, focusing on effect level (outcome) indicators, and develop-
ment of a plan to adjust implementation, as required
• Post-Project Evaluation, focusing on impact level
Source: CARE’s Guide for the Use of Maternal and Newborn Health Planning Tools prepared by
Susan Rae Ross.
During Pregnancy
During Labor
During Postpartum
Intervention Package for Time Periods of Pregnancy, Neonatal, and Infant Life
BIRTH
Conception 20 wks 28 wks 4 wks One year
Perinatal
(22 weeks gestation to
7 days after birth)
Infant
Fetal-infant
Stillbirths = babies born dead after 22 weeks of gestation (birth weight more than 500 g)
(Note: WHO recommends international reporting of fetal deaths only for those more than 28 weeks/[1kg])
Magnesium sulfate
Unsafe
Antibiotics abortion
Tetanus Toxoid 13%
Immunization Infection Eclampsia
Clean delivery 15% 12%
Obs. labor
Partogram 8% Severe
bleeding Active
Other direct 24% management * Other direct causes include:
causes of the third ectopic pregnancy, embolism,
8%* stage of labor
Indirect anesthesia-related
causes
20%** ** Indirect causes include: ane-
mia, malaria, heart disease
Source: Adapted from “Maternal
Health Around the World”
Iron supplements, malaria intermittent
World Health Organization,
treatment and antiretrovirals for HIV Geneva, 1997
• Tetanus Toxoid
Immunization of mother
• Clean delivery
Cong. • Cord care
Anom.
• Early and exclusive breastfeeding
10%
Infection • Antibiotics
32%
• Birth spacing
• Maternal nutrition Tetanus
• Malaria control Complications Sepsis
of prematurity Respiratory infection
• Kangaroo care Diarrhea
24%
• Warming
• Resuscitation
• Skilled birth attendants
Reduced:
• Keep delivery • Early & exclusive Maternal-to-
PMTCT
* endemic areas.
** AROM: artificial rupture of membrane.
Bold, italicized sentences indicate evidence based basic care package for HIV infected
women and HIV exposed newborns.
Endnotes
i. Ibid.
ii. This definition was adapted from “The critical role of the skilled attendant: a joint statement by
WHO, ICM and FIGO”. World Health Organization, Geneva 2004 (draft).
iii. Skilled attendant at birth – 2004 global estimates. WHO; http://www.who.int/reproductive-
health/global_monitoring/skilled_attendant.html
iv. Haws R, PJ Winch, J Castillo, Innovative Community-based Interventions to Improve Newborn
Health in Latin America and the Caribbean. The CORE Group: 2004; www.coregroup.org
v. Ibid.