Lab 3 - Inverter Layout Design
Lab 3 - Inverter Layout Design
3.
4.
PROGRAMME 3 BERC
SECTION / S1/1
GROUP
23/4/2024
DATE
1
5.0 RESULTS
1. Layout design
2
2. DRC
3
3. LVS
4
4. Parasitic netlist
5. Simulation waveform (with parasitics) with measured value of tpLH and tpHL.
5
6. Simulation waveform (without parasitics) with measured value of tpLH and tpHL.
6
7. Propagation delay comparison of pre-layout (without parasitics) and post-layout (with
parasitics) waveforms.
Table 5.1 : Propagation delay comparison.
Design tPLH (ns) tPHL (ns) tPD (ns)
Pre-layout (without parasitics) 0.0411 0.0251 0.0331
From my observations the propagation delay tPLH and tPHL are larger for the post-layout
simulation compared to the pre-layout simulation. This is because the post-layout simulations
account for parasitic capacitances and resistances extracted from the actual layout, which slows
down the switching speeds of the transistors.
Based on your learning experience in Lab 3, suggest the best layout practice(s) for designing
CMOS circuit for high speed application.
7.0 CONCLUSION
Conclude what you have learned in this lab session
In this lab, we learned how to design and simulate a basic CMOS inverter circuit using industry-standard VLSI
design tools. We created the layout adhering to design rules, performed verification checks like DRC and LVS,
extracted parasitic capacitances and resistances from the layout, and ran simulations accounting for these parasitic
effects. We observed how the layout parasitics significantly degraded the circuit speed compared to ideal pre-
layout simulations. We also saw how simply increasing the length of one metal connection further slowed down
the circuit timing. This lab gave insights into critical layout effects that must be considered for high-performance
integrated circuit design.