We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 11
CONSISTENCY AND PLASTICITY OF SOILS
STATE OF CONSISTENCY
The term consistency refers to the relative ease with which a soil mass can be
deformed and is used to describe the degree of firmness of fine-grained soils for
which consistency relates to a large extent to water content. The four states of
consistency suggested by Atterberg are indicated below in Figures 1 and 2.
Fluid soil-water
mixture Liquid State
. Liguid Limit, LL
i
i Plastic State
8 Plastic Limit, PL
e Semisolid State
i Shrinkage Limit, SL
Solid State
Dry Soil
The four states of consistencyAtterberg Limits (cont.)
Wetting
Semi | i [Plastic | [Liquid
Volume, v ore
Dying __ w%
Fig. 2: The four states of consistency in a chart form
In the solid state there will be no change in volume of soil mass accompanying
change in water content. In the remaining the three states increase in water content
is accompanies by increase in volume of soil mass and decrease of water content by
reduction in volume of soil mass. In the liquid state the soil mass behaves like a
liquid possessing very less sheer strength. In the plastic state the soil mass can be
deformed without cracking. In the semi-solid state the soil mass cannot be deformed
without cracking.
‘The water contents, which arbitrarily define the boundary between the four states of
consistency, are referred to as consistency limits or Atterbag limits
‘The three consistency limits are Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Shrinkage Limit.
Liquid limit is denoted by Wi, and is the boundary between plastic and liquid states of
consistency. It is the minimum water content at which the soil mass stil flows like a
liquid,
Liquid limit is defined as the water context at which a groove, cut with a standard
grooving tool, in soil pat taken in the cup of a standard liquid limit device (Fig. 3)
Closes for a distance of 13mm when the cup is imparted 25 blows.Fig. 3: The standard liquid limit device
Plastic limit is denoted by Wp and is the boundary between semi-solid and plastic
states of consistency. It is the minimum water content at which the soil mass can still
be deformed without cracking.
Plastic limit is defined as the water context at which the soil mass can be rolled into @
threat of 3mm diameter and the thread first shows signs of cracking.
Shrinkage limit is denoted by Ws and is the boundary between solid and semi-solid
state of consistency. It is defined as the maximum water content at which there is no
reduction in volume of soil mass accompanying reduction in water content.DETERMINATION OF SOIL PROPERTIES BY LABORATORY
TESTING
DETERMINATION OF LIQUID LIMIT
Casagrande Apparatus
The apparatus consists of a mechanical device consisting of a cup mounted on an
edge pivot. The cup rests on a hard rubber base. A mechanism enables the cup
to be lifted by 10mm and dropped on the base. The soil is put in cup and levelled
off horizontally. The soil is divided by a standard grooving tool through the pivot
of the cup. The two halves of the soil flow together as the cup is repeatedly
dropped onto the base. The number of drops at the rate of two revolutions per
second required to close the groove over a distance of 13mm is recorded. The
test is repeated over four times and the water content is determined each time.
The water content is plotted against log of blows. The best straight line fitting
the points is drawn. The moisture content at twenty five (25) blow is the Liquid
Limit of the soil. Fig. 4 and 5 show Casagrande Equipment.
N=25 blows
_. Closing distance =
13mm
4: Schematic representation of the Casagrande ApparatusFig. 5: A photograph of the Casagrande Apparatus
It is convenient to increase the water content in successive steps and obtain
counts near about 40, 30, 20 and 10.
The resulting curve drawn as the best fitting straight line is called the “flow
curve” (Fig. 6).
Fig. 6: low CurveCone Penetrometer Appratus
The Penetrometer is fitted with a stainless steel cone having a smooth, polished
surface. The cone is approximately 35 mm long and has an angle of 30° + 1°.
The mass of the cone together with its sliding shaft is 800.
‘A metal cup, about 55mm in diameter and 40mm deep is used to contain the test
sample. Fig. 7 shows the Cone Penetrometer Apparatus Schematic.
7: The Cone Penetrometer Apparatus
An air dry soil sample (about 250) passing the 425 micron sieve is mixed with
distilled water. The soil paste is filled in the metal cup and the surface struck off
level. The cone is lowered to just touch the surface of soil and then released for
a period of 5 seconds. The penetration is recorded. The cone is lifted and
leaned. The test is repeated over four different moisture contents, The moisture
contents used in the tests should be such that the penetrations obtained lie
within a range of 15 to 35 mm.
To obtain the liquid limit, cone penetration is plotted against moisture content
both on normal scales to give the best fitting straight line. The moisture content
corresponding to a cone penetration of 20mm is taken as the liquid limit of the
soil (Fig. 8), which for all practical purposes is the same as the LL determined
by the Casagrande apparatus.
‘The Cone Peretrometer method gives 2 more consistent estimate of the LL than
the Casagrande apparatus, with greater repeatability and less operator20mm
Penetration of cone
(mm)
LL
Water content w%
8: Gone penetration against moisture content
DETERMINATION OF PLASTIC LIMIT
The sample of soil is mixed with distilled water until it is sufficiently plastic to be
rolled into a ball between palms of hands. A small portion of the ball is then rolled on
a smooth plate into a thread of 3mm diameter, and the thread is looked for signs of
cracking. If no cracks are seen, the thread is picked up and again rolled into a ball
between palms, The water content is reduced by the heat of the fingers. The ball is
then rolled on smooth plate into a threat of 3mm diameter. The steps are repeated
until a 3mm diameter threat first shows signs of cracking. A portion of the threat is
taken for water content determination which gives the plastic limit.
Fig. 9: Rolling on a smooth plate1 Sonate ne 9
Fig. 10: Raling on between palms of hands
2a
Fig. 11: Si] thread 3mm diameter just crumbles
DETERMINATION OF SHRINKAGE LIMIT
It is defined as the maximum water content at which there is no reduction in volume
of soil mass accompanying reduction in water content.
A saturated sample of soll is placed in a container of known volume Vi. The weight of
the soil is determined in stage (a) of the experiment. The soil is initially dried in the
air and then in an oven to ensure that no cracks are formed, Further drying of the
soil at some water content (b) will not result in the reduction of the volume of the
soil.
‘At stage (c) of the drying process the soil is completely dry but the volume in the
stage is the same as at stage (b). The weight of the soil is measured at stage (c) and
its volume is measured by immersing the dry soil in mercury.TS — -_——
(Var Ma)
Air | lo
M,
m, Va
lm, va M,
() Soil at (6) Dry Soll
Fig. 12: Srinkage Limit Phase Diagram
Mass of Water in (b)
Shrinkage Limit = “\455 of Soil Solids
(2) Fully saturated sample of soil of volume Vi and (b) mass M; which on reducing
water content attains volume V2 and Mass Mz.
If it is assumed that any further reduction in water does not cause a decrease in the
total volume of the sample, the water content is the shrinkage limit.
Mass of water in (a) = (Mi Ma)
Loss in water from (a) to (b) = (Vir¥V2)¥w
(4,-M,
Mass of water (b) = Vimvelre
Ms
ATTERBERG INDICES
1. Plasticity Index
Is defined as Liquid Limit minus Plastic Limit
PL=LL-PL2. Flow Index, J
Is the slope of flow curve obtained by plotting water content as ordinate or
natural scale against number of blows as abscissa on logarithmic scale (Fig. 13).
Fig. 13: Flow curve for determination of Liquid Limit
Where;
‘w; = water content corresponding to number of blows Ni, and
‘Ww, = water content corresponding to number of blows No.
3. Toughness Index
Defined as the ratio of Plasticity Index to Flow Index.
4. Consistency Index
Defined as the ratio of Liquid Limit
Index.
LL-w
Te=
aA
jinus natural Water Content to the Plasticity5. Liquidity Index
Defined as the ratio of natural Water Content minus Plastic Limit to Plasticity
Index.
USE OF CONSISTENCY LIMITS
‘The consistency limits and related indices are very useful for soil identification and
dlassification. The limits are often in specification for soll compaction and in semi=
empirical methods of design. The liquid limit and plastic limit depend on both the
type and amount of clay.
Plasticity Index Plasticity
0 Non-Plastic
<2 Low Plastic
7-17 Medium Plastic
>17, Highly Plastic
‘The following table shows some typical values of Atterberg Limits
jt Values for the Clay Minerals.
Table 10.1 Atterberg Li
Liguid Plastic Shrinkage
Limit Limit Limit
Mineral* (%) (%)
Montmorillonite 100 900 50 100 8s
Nontronite 37-72 19-27
lite 60-120 35-60
Kaolinite 30-110 25-40
Hydrated Halloysite 50-70 47-60
Dehydrated Halloysite 30-45
Attapulgite tov-250 lv 12
Chlorite 44-47 36-40
130.140
Allophane (undrie 200.