F W Taylor
F W Taylor
F W Taylor
“Taylorism”
People have been managing work for hundreds of years, and we can trace formal management ideas
to the 1700s. But the most significant developments in management theory emerged in the 20th
century. We owe much of our understanding of managerial practices to the many theorists of this
period, who tried to understand how best to conduct business.
Historical Perspective
One of the earliest of these theorists was Frederick Winslow Taylor. He started the Scientific
Management movement, and he and his associates were the first people to study the work process
scientifically. They studied how work was performed, and they looked at how this affected worker
productivity. Taylor's philosophy focused on the belief that making people work as hard as they
could was not as efficient as optimizing the way the work was done.
In 1909, Taylor published "The Principles of Scientific Management." In this, he proposed that by
optimizing and simplifying jobs, productivity would increase. He also advanced the idea that
workers and managers needed to cooperate with one another. This was very different from the way
work was typically done in businesses beforehand. A factory manager at that time had very little
contact with the workers, and he left them on their own to produce the necessary product. There was
no standardization, and a worker's main motivation was often continued employment, so there was
no incentive to work as quickly or as efficiently as possible.
Taylor believed that all workers were motivated by money, so he promoted the idea of "a fair day's
pay for a fair day's work." In other words, if a worker didn't achieve enough in a day, he didn't
deserve to be paid as much as another worker who was highly productive.
With a background in mechanical engineering, Taylor was very interested in efficiency. While
advancing his career at a U.S. steel manufacturer, he designed workplace experiments to determine
optimal performance levels. In one, he experimented with shovel design until he had a design that
would allow workers to shovel for several hours straight. With bricklayers, he experimented with
the various motions required and developed an efficient way to lay bricks. And he applied the
scientific method to study the optimal way to do any type of workplace task. As such, he found that
by calculating the time needed for the various elements of a task, he could develop the "best" way to
complete that task.
These "time and motion" studies also led Taylor to conclude that certain people could work more
efficiently than others. These were the people whom managers should seek to hire where possible.
Therefore, selecting the right people for the job was another important part of workplace efficiency.
Taking what he learned from these workplace experiments, Taylor developed four principles of
scientific management. These principles are also known simply as "Taylorism".
Critiques of Taylorism
Taylor's Scientific Management Theory promotes the idea that there is "one right way" to do
something. As such, it is at odds with current approaches such as MBO (Management By
Objectives), Continuous Improvement initiatives, BPR (Business Process Reengineering), and
other tools like them. These promote individual responsibility, and seek to push decision making
through all levels of the organization.
The idea here is that workers are given as much autonomy as practically possible, so that they can
use the most appropriate approaches for the situation at hand. (Reflect here on your own experience
– are you happier and more motivated when you're following tightly controlled procedures, or when
you're working using your own judgment?) What's more, front line workers need to show this sort
of flexibility in a rapidly-changing environment. Rigid, rules-driven organizations really struggle to
adapt in these situations.
Teamwork is another area where pure Taylorism is in opposition to current practice. Essentially,
Taylorism breaks tasks down into tiny steps, and focuses on how each person can do his or her
specific series of steps best. Modern methodologies prefer to examine work systems more
holistically in order to evaluate efficiency and maximize productivity. The extreme specialization
that Taylorism promotes is contrary to modern ideals of how to provide a motivating and satisfying
workplace.
Where Taylorism separates manual from mental work, modern productivity enhancement practices
seek to incorporate worker's ideas, experience and knowledge into best practice. Scientific
management in its pure form focuses too much on the mechanics, and fails to value the people side
of work, whereby motivation and workplace satisfaction are key elements in an efficient and
productive organization.