How To Characterize Low-Noise Amplifiers
How To Characterize Low-Noise Amplifiers
How to Characterize
Low-Noise Amplifiers
Introduction
System developers depend on low-noise amplifiers (LNAs) across various applications, including
wireless communications, sensor networks, navigation satellites, and radio telescopes. These
LNAs amplify low-power signals while maintaining a high system signal-to-noise ratio (SNR). Along
with common amplifier considerations like gain and linearity, LNAs must offer low noise figure
functionality to preserve signal quality and system sensitivity.
A low-noise amplifier’s performance impacts receiver quality and reliability more than any other
component, making it critical for cellular-end equipment, base stations, wireless local area networks
(Wi-Fi), and aviation and satellite communication systems. Testing receivers operating in the FR1
and FR2 frequency bands requires accuracy and repeatability to ensure conformance with the latest
standards. However, convoluted conventional active device measurement setups require multiple
instruments.
In this white paper, learn how the flexible hardware and advanced software capabilities of the ENA-X
network analyzer simplify a low-noise amplifier’s performance characterization while improving
measurement accuracy and repeatability.
Figure 1. Friis’s formula shows that the total receiver noise factor, FTotal, accounts for the noise factor, FN, and gain, GN, per
stage. The first stage noise factor, F1, affects the overall receiver noise figure.
The noise figure describes the amount of excess noise present in a system. Minimizing the noise
figure reduces system impairments that result from noise. Excess noise degrades the signal quality,
like static on a television broadcast or cell phone call. In military applications like radar or secure
communications, receiver noise limits the system’s effective range.
System designers try to optimize the overall system SNR by either increasing the signal power or by
reducing noise. Developers might increase transmit signal power using more powerful components
or minimize path loss between the transmitter and receiver. However, improving the receiver’s noise
figure is the easiest and most cost-effective way to optimize SNR.
Traditionally, engineers use the Y-factor method to measure the noise figure, as shown in Figure 2. The
Y-factor method setup includes a calibrated noise source with a specially designed noise switch, an
attenuator to provide a good output match, and either a spectrum analyzer or noise figure analyzer.
When the diode is off, the noise source presents a room temperature — cold — termination to the DUT.
During reverse bias, the diode undergoes avalanche breakdown, creating considerable noise.
Engineers characterize this extra noise as the excess noise ratio (ENR). Engineers use the noise source
to conduct two noise power measurements at the output of the DUT and then use the ratio of the two
measurements, called the Y-factor, to calculate the noise figure.
ΔP out
Pout (cold) = amplifier gain
ΔP in
Based on the limitations of the test instruments, when performing noise figure measurements using
the Y-factor method, engineers must assume a 50-ohm match for the noise source during both the
hot and cold measurements. Additionally, since the conventional test setup is unable to correct for
any mismatch at the input of the DUT, accuracy degrades as the DUT’s match gets worse. These test
set limitations and introduce significant uncertainty into the noise figure data captured with the
Y-factor method, especially for non-connectorized devices.
Modulation standards, such as 802.11ac and 5G New Radio (NR), set the minimum acceptable EVM
level. As standard stringency increases, so does the need to capture and optimize LNA linearity and
EVM accurately.
IQ
Q
magnitude
I err[n] 2 + Q err[n] 2
Error
EVM [n] = error
vector
Figure 3. The definition of EVM is the root mean square (RMS) of the error vector over time at the instants of the symbol
clock transitions, where the error vector is the vector difference at a given time between the ideal reference signal and the
measured signal
The instrument of choice for all typical continuous wave (CW) and two-tone testing is a vector
network analyzer (VNA). However, modern communication standards require complex modulation of
wideband signals.
Testing the modulated wideband signal distortion measurements like EVM and adjacent channel
power ratio (ACPR) using the conventional method requires a signal analyzer and signal generator
setup. Switching between two separate test setups to complete gain and linearity measurements not
only wastes valuable test time but also introduces complexity in correlating results between the two
stations. Furthermore, the external test fixtures needed to perform EVM measurements on a signal
analyzer, such as attenuators or booster amplifiers, present even more measurement uncertainty.
Advancements in network analyzer technology enable engineers to conduct fully calibrated noise
figure measurements using the cold-source method, illustrated in Figure 4. The ENA-X additionally
performs EVM and ACPR measurements. Beyond simplifying the test setup, the measurement methods
and techniques enabled by the network analyzer enable more accurate results.
Alternative to the Y-factor method, the cold-source method offers more advanced error correction
that yields higher accuracy measurements. The engineer measures a single noise power measurement
with a cold termination on the input of the device under test (DUT). The noise measured includes both
the amplified input noise and the noise contributed by the LNA. As part of the overall noise figure
measurement, the VNA captures the DUT's S-parameters and gain. The VNA automatically subtracts
the amplified input noise from the measurement, leaving only the noise contributed by the DUT. From
this, the network analyzer calculates noise figure.
Like the Y-factor method, the cold-source method requires a calibration step to characterize the noise
figure and gain of the test instrument’s noise receiver. However, the cold-source method requires a
noise source (or power meter) only during calibration, not during the measurement of the DUT.
By using a VNA to capture the noise figure using the cold-source method, engineers get the fully
vector-corrected noise parameters of the LNA. This data allows for the accurate analysis of the
DUT’s noise figure at 50-ohms. Additionally, the network analyzer offers the highest accuracy gain
measurements through full vector correction.
14
12
10
8
6
0.E+00 1.E+10 2.E+10 3.E+10 4.E+10 5.E+10
Frequency (Hz)
Figure 5. ENA-X exceeds PNA-X noise figure measurement performance up to 20 GHz and performs comparably up to 30 GHz
The ENA-X offers expanded software application features, which enable spectrum and signal
analysis. This functionality makes fully vector-corrected modulated signal EVM and ACPR
measurements available on the same setup used for CW and two-tone testing. The ENA-X employs
the Keysight spectral correlation technique to directly analyze the modulated input and output
signals in the frequency domain.
Figure 6 shows that by applying vector and source calibration to the EVM measurement, the VNA
delivers the residual EVM by moving the reference plane to that of the DUT. This process means that
the network analyzer removes all test system error contributions from the LNA EVM results.
Figure 6. Before vector calibration, the VNA measures everything beyond its ports, including cables and connectors. After
calibration, the VNA moves the test reference plane to that of the DUT, correcting for all fixtures.
Conclusion
The performance of the LNA crucially impacts signal quality and receiver sensitivity across various
industries and communication systems. To optimize receiver performance, engineers need
dependable data from LNA noise figure, gain, and linearity measurements. However, conventional
noise figure and EVM measurements require multiple setups, increasing test cycle time and
complexity, as well as introducing potential error.
With the ENA-X network analyzer, avoid wasting valuable time manually reconfiguring setups or
automating complex switch-based systems. The ENA-X network analyzer provides flexible hardware
and advanced software capabilities that developers need to consolidate their test setup for robust
characterization of LNAs. The VNA cold-source method and integrated low-noise receivers simplify the
noise figure measurement setup while improving accuracy.
By combining vector and source correction, integrated hardware, and direct receiver access, an
engineer can create a single test set. This test set is capable of executing accurate and repeatable
CW, two-tone, and modulated signal measurements at the DUT’s reference plane. A single setup offers
engineers realistic and repeatable LNA performance characterization under modulated stimulus in
high-power systems operating at up to 44 GHz.
• Use the Right Vector Network Analyzer for the Job – Product Fact Sheet
Web Resources
• Keysight ENA Vector Network Analyzer
This information is subject to change without notice. © Keysight Technologies, 2018 - 2023,
Published in USA, October 5, 2023, 7123-1096.EN