M204 Syst II
M204 Syst II
where
x01(t)
x1(t)
x2(t) 0
x02(t)
x(t) = .. is the unknown vector -function x (t) = ..
,
. .
xn(t) x0n(t)
g1(t)
g2(t)
g(t) =
...
gn(t)
3
Theorem
sisP01
2.3. If x1(t), · · · , xn(t) are solutions of the equation
(2.3) on (α, β), and
W [x1, · · · , xn](t0) 6= 0
for some t0 ∈ (α, β), then the general solution of the system has
the form,
x(t) = C1x1(t) + · · · + Cnxn(t),
where C1, · · · , Cn are arbitrary constants.
sisP01
Proof. Let φ(t) be an arbitrary solution of the equation (2.3) and
consider the system of equations
C1x11(t0) + C2x12(t0) + · · · + c1nx1n(t0) = φ01,
C x (t ) + C x (t ) + · · · + c x (t ) = φ0,
1 21 0 2 22 0 1n 2n 0 2
(2.5) algs
· · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · · ,
C1xn1(t0) + C2xn2(t0) + · · · + c1nxnn(t0) = φ0n,
where
0
φ1 x11(t0) x1n(t0)
φ02 x21(t0) x2n(t0)
. = φ(t0), ... = x1(t0), · · · , ... = xn(t0)
..
φ0n xn1(t0) xnn(t0)
algs
Since determinant of the system (2.5) W [x1, · · · , xn](t0) 6= 0, it
has a unique solution (C1∗, C2∗, · · · , Cn∗).
Thus the vector function
x∗(t) = C1∗x1(t) + C2∗x2(t) + · · · + Cn∗xn(t)
sisP01
is a solution of the system (2.3) that satisifes the initial condition
x∗(t0) = φ(t0),
So the vector - functions x∗(t) and φ(t) satisfy the same system
and the the same initial condition. Therefore due to the Theorem
5
eu1s
2.1 we have
φ(t) = C1∗x1(t) + C2∗x2(t) + · · · + Cn∗xn(t),
sisP01
i.e. arbitrary solution φ(t) of the sytem (2.3) is a linear combination
of vector functions x1(t), x2(t), · · · , xn(t), provided W [x1, · · · xn](t0) 6=
0.
Definition
sisP01
2.4. If x1(t), · · · , xn(t) are solutions of the equation
(2.3) on (α, β) and
W [x1, · · · , xn](t0) 6= 0,
for some t0 ∈ (α, β), then x1(t), · · · , xn(t) is called fundamental
sisP01
set of solutions of the system (2.3).
sisP1
gens Theorem 2.5. A general solution of the system (2.2) has the
form
x(t) = xh(t) + v(t),
sisP01
where xh(t) is a general solution of the homogeneous sytem (2.3)
and v(t) is some particular solution of the nonhomogeneous sytem
sisP1
(2.2).
The proof of this theorem follows from the fact that, if xsisHo 1 (t)
and x2(t) are solutions of the non-homogeneous equation (2.6),
then their difference is a solution of the correspondin homogeneous
eqation
x0(t) = P (t)x(t) (2.6) sisHo
AbelSys Theorem
sisHo
2.6. (Abel’s Theorem) If the coefficients of the system
(2.6) are continuous on some interval (α, β) and the vector func-
tions
x11(t) x1n(t)
x21(t) x2n(t)
x1(t) =
...
, · · · , xn (t) = .
..
xn1(t) xnn(t)
sisHo
are solutions of the system (2.6), then the following formula for the
Wronskian W (t) of these vector-functions holds true
R
[p11 (t)+···+pnn (t)]dt
W (t) = Ce . (2.8) Abfs
i.e.
(
x011(t) = p11(t)x11(t) + p12x21(t),
, (2.10) sis22a
x021(t) = p21(t)x11(t) + p22x21(t),
(
x012(t) = p11(t)x12(t) + p12x22(t),
. (2.11) sis22a
x022(t) = p21(t)x12(t) + p22x22(t),
7
Integrating
Abfs
this equation
Wnn
we obtain the desired Abel’s formula
(2.8). The equation (2.16) implies also that
Rt
W [x1, · · · , xn](t) = W [x1, · · · , xn](t0)e t0 [p11 (τ )+···+pnn (τ )]dτ .
Abfs0
It follows from the Abel’s formula (??) that if the wronskain of
solutions x1(t), · · · , xn(t) is zero at some point , then it is zero at
each point t..
It is clear that if n vector fucntions x1(t), · · · , xn(t) are linearly
dependent on some inerval (α, β), then their wronskain iz zero for
each t ∈ (α, β).
The inverse of this statment is not true. In fact the vector functions
3 2
t t |t|
y1(t) = 2 and y2(t) =
t t|t|
are linearly independent on R, but
W [y1(t), y2](t) = 0, ∀t ∈ R.