Criminal Procedure I 2021-2022
Criminal Procedure I 2021-2022
MULTIMEDIA UNIVERSITY
FINAL EXAMINATION
TRIMESTER 1, 2021 / 2022 SESSION
27 NOVEMBER 2021
Reading Time: 9.15 a.m. – 9.30 a.m.
(15 Minutes)
INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENT
1. Students will have fifteen minutes during which they may read the paper and
make rough notes only in their question paper. Students then have the remaining
three hours in which to answer the questions.
3. Attempt ALL questions in PART A and any ONE question in PART B. The
distribution of the marks for each question is given.
4. Students are only allowed to bring in CLEAN AND ORIGINAL COPY of the
following statutes into the exam venue:
i. Criminal Procedure Code; and
ii. Penal Code
“Clean” is defined to include no tagging, no annotation either by the publisher or
anyone else, and no erased marking. Highlighting and underlining are also
prohibited.
QUESTION 1
(a) Dr. Sakura had operated a medical clinic at Lot 123 under the name of ‘Clinic
Sakura’ since 2015. By a letter dated 29 November 2020, the Ministry of Health gave
Dr. Sakura two weeks to furnish them with information and supporting documents
failure of which the clinic’s registration would be revoked. After the expiry of the
deadline stipulated in the letter, a team of Inspector from the Ministry of Health
entered Dr. Sakura's premise and confiscated certain goods and business equipment.
The search and seizure was made pursuant to s 90(d) of the Private Healthcare
Facilities and Services Act 1998. The officers however failed to prepare a search list
of the items seized under s 95 of the Act.
Dr. Sakura filed an application to declare that the search of its premise was unlawful
and the officers had committed a criminal trespass. She also contended that the
evidence had been illegally obtained and therefore inadmissible as evidence.
As the Federal counsel handling this case, determine the appropriate rebuttal against
the allegation.
he may exercise in, and in respect of, the private healthcare facility or
premises all the powers referred to in s 89 in as full and ample a manner
as if he were authorized to do so by warrant issued under that section.
(21 marks)
Continued…
RM/MAA 1/5
UCP4612 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I 27 NOVEMBER 2021
(b) Being suspicious, Inspector Boruto took Shino to Hospital Serdang. At the
hospital, Shino had undergone an X-ray examination which was conducted by a
Radiographer. The X-ray showed that there were foreign objects in the Shino's
abdomen. Shino was subsequently detained. During the next 3 days the accused
excreted 60 capsules which were washed and carefully marked by the sentry on duty
accompanied by the preparation of search lists noting the excretion.
(Total: 25 Marks)
QUESTION 2
(8 marks)
Continued…
RM/MAA 2/5
UCP4612 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I 27 NOVEMBER 2021
(c) Distinguish cases where the Public Prosecutor must “require” them to be
transferred to the High Court the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952.
(8 marks)
(Total: 25 Marks)
Continued…
RM/MAA 3/5
UCP4612 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I 27 NOVEMBER 2021
QUESTION 3
Luffy suffered an injury and went for a treatment at Hospital Konoha. Upon receiving
treatment, Luffy went to the police hut (pondok polis) in the hospital at about 7.30
p.m. He spoke to Corporal Ace, complaining that a man named Kaido stabbed him.
Corporal Ace was about to record the complaint when he received a telephone call
from Inspector Sanji at 7.35 p.m. Inspector Sanji instructed him to detain a man
named Luffy as he was a suspect in a murder case. The suspect was injured and was at
the hospital for a treatment.
Upon hearing this, Corporal Arrest immediately arrested Luffy. Luffy was brought to
the Police Station. At 8.13 p.m., ASP Nami came to record the statement from Luffy.
The recording completed at 9.00 p.m.
On the next day, Luffy was brought to the deceased’s house. He told Inspector Sanji
that he thrown the knife into a bush near the house. Inspector Sanji had recovered the
knife inside the bush.
Analyse the above facts and determine the admissibility of the statement made by
Luffy to Corporal Ace, ASP Nami and Inspector Sanji.
(25 marks)
(Total: 25 Marks)
Continued…
RM/MAA 4/5
UCP4612 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I 27 NOVEMBER 2021
PART B:
QUESTION 4A
The four accused in this case ('A1, A2, A3 and A4') were charged, in furtherance of
their common intention, with the murder of a woman (Nina Naomi), her driver, a
lawyer and a banker on a farm in Kota Tinggi, Johor, between 8.30pm and 9.45pm on
30 August 2021.
Based on the facts above, with reference to statutory provisions and case law address
the issues below:
(a) Determine on whether the trial against the four accused person can be proceeded
jointly.
(15 marks)
(b) A1 was charged together with the other three (3) accused person for the murder of
the woman (Nina Naomi). Draft a charge against A1.
(10 marks)
(25 Marks)
OR
QUESTION 4B
“…….this discretionary power must be exercised judicially. In order for this court to
exercise its discretionary power, this court must be satisfied that there are sufficient
materials before the court to consider or justify invoking its powers under s. 158 of
the CPC and it must be invoked only at the appropriate time as expressly regulated
by s. 158 of the CPC. The procedure expressly regulated by s. 158 of the CPC cannot
be varied by consent or be waived.”
[In the case of PP v Azwan & Another Case [2007] 10 CLJ 469, VT Singham J
opined]
(Total: 25 Marks)
End of Page
RM/MAA 5/5