0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views6 pages

Criminal Procedure I 2021-2022

Final year paper mmu law

Uploaded by

Nukman Hakim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
28 views6 pages

Criminal Procedure I 2021-2022

Final year paper mmu law

Uploaded by

Nukman Hakim
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 6

STUDENT ID NO

MULTIMEDIA UNIVERSITY

FINAL EXAMINATION
TRIMESTER 1, 2021 / 2022 SESSION

UCP4612 – CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I


(All Sections / Groups)

27 NOVEMBER 2021
Reading Time: 9.15 a.m. – 9.30 a.m.
(15 Minutes)

Answering Time: 9.30 a.m. – 12.30 p.m.


(3 Hours)
_____________________________________________________________________

INSTRUCTIONS TO STUDENT

1. Students will have fifteen minutes during which they may read the paper and
make rough notes only in their question paper. Students then have the remaining
three hours in which to answer the questions.

2. This question paper consists of 5 pages with 5 questions only.

3. Attempt ALL questions in PART A and any ONE question in PART B. The
distribution of the marks for each question is given.

4. Students are only allowed to bring in CLEAN AND ORIGINAL COPY of the
following statutes into the exam venue:
i. Criminal Procedure Code; and
ii. Penal Code
“Clean” is defined to include no tagging, no annotation either by the publisher or
anyone else, and no erased marking. Highlighting and underlining are also
prohibited.

5. Write all your answers in the Answer Booklet provided.


UCP4612 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I 27 NOVEMBER 2021

PART A: Attempt ALL questions.

QUESTION 1

Answer all parts of this question.

(a) Dr. Sakura had operated a medical clinic at Lot 123 under the name of ‘Clinic
Sakura’ since 2015. By a letter dated 29 November 2020, the Ministry of Health gave
Dr. Sakura two weeks to furnish them with information and supporting documents
failure of which the clinic’s registration would be revoked. After the expiry of the
deadline stipulated in the letter, a team of Inspector from the Ministry of Health
entered Dr. Sakura's premise and confiscated certain goods and business equipment.
The search and seizure was made pursuant to s 90(d) of the Private Healthcare
Facilities and Services Act 1998. The officers however failed to prepare a search list
of the items seized under s 95 of the Act.

Dr. Sakura filed an application to declare that the search of its premise was unlawful
and the officers had committed a criminal trespass. She also contended that the
evidence had been illegally obtained and therefore inadmissible as evidence.

As the Federal counsel handling this case, determine the appropriate rebuttal against
the allegation.

Private Healthcare Facilities and Services Act 1998

S 89. Power to search and seize. (with warrant)

S 90: Search and seizure without warrant.


If an Inspector has reasonable cause to believe that by reason of delay in
obtaining a search warrant under s 89,

(d) the evidence sought may be tampered with or destroyed,

he may exercise in, and in respect of, the private healthcare facility or
premises all the powers referred to in s 89 in as full and ample a manner
as if he were authorized to do so by warrant issued under that section.

S 95: List of things seized.


(1) Where any seizure is made under s 88, 89 or 90 on any private
healthcare facility or premises the seizing Inspector shall prepare a list of
the things seized from the premises.

(21 marks)

Continued…

RM/MAA 1/5
UCP4612 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I 27 NOVEMBER 2021

(b) Being suspicious, Inspector Boruto took Shino to Hospital Serdang. At the
hospital, Shino had undergone an X-ray examination which was conducted by a
Radiographer. The X-ray showed that there were foreign objects in the Shino's
abdomen. Shino was subsequently detained. During the next 3 days the accused
excreted 60 capsules which were washed and carefully marked by the sentry on duty
accompanied by the preparation of search lists noting the excretion.

Identify the mode of body search in this situation.


(4 marks)

(Total: 25 Marks)

QUESTION 2

Answer all parts of this question.

(a) Analyse the procedure to commencement of proceedings before a Magistrate’s


court when a Magistrate is of the opinion that the Magistrate taking cognizance of an
offence and there is sufficient grounds for proceeding.
(9 marks)

(b) Identify the roles and duty of the Public Prosecutor.

(8 marks)

Continued…

RM/MAA 2/5
UCP4612 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I 27 NOVEMBER 2021

(c) Distinguish cases where the Public Prosecutor must “require” them to be
transferred to the High Court the Dangerous Drugs Act 1952.

Dangerous Drugs Act 1952

Section 41A. Special provisions relating to transmission of a


case to, and trial by, the High Court.
(1) Where any case in respect of an offence under this Act is
triable exclusively by the High Court or is required by the Public
Prosecutor to be tried by the High Court, the accused person
shall be produced before the appropriate subordinate court which
shall, after the charge has been explained to him, transmit the
case to the High Court without holding a preliminary inquiry
under Chapter XVII of the Criminal Procedure Code, and cause
the accused person to appear or be brought before such Court as
soon as may be practicable.
(2) When the accused person appears or is brought before the
High Court in accordance with subsection (1), the High Court
shall fix a date for his trial which shall be held in accordance
with the procedure under Chapter XX of the Criminal Procedure
Code.
(3) The trial of a case transmitted to the High Court under
subsection (1) shall be by a Judge of the High Court sitting
alone, and *Chapters XXI and XXII of the Criminal Procedure
Code shall not apply to such trial. (4) Subsections (1), (2) and (3)
shall have effect notwithstanding any other written law to the
contrary

(8 marks)

(Total: 25 Marks)

Continued…

RM/MAA 3/5
UCP4612 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I 27 NOVEMBER 2021

QUESTION 3

Luffy suffered an injury and went for a treatment at Hospital Konoha. Upon receiving
treatment, Luffy went to the police hut (pondok polis) in the hospital at about 7.30
p.m. He spoke to Corporal Ace, complaining that a man named Kaido stabbed him.

Corporal Ace was about to record the complaint when he received a telephone call
from Inspector Sanji at 7.35 p.m. Inspector Sanji instructed him to detain a man
named Luffy as he was a suspect in a murder case. The suspect was injured and was at
the hospital for a treatment.

Upon hearing this, Corporal Arrest immediately arrested Luffy. Luffy was brought to
the Police Station. At 8.13 p.m., ASP Nami came to record the statement from Luffy.
The recording completed at 9.00 p.m.

On the next day, Luffy was brought to the deceased’s house. He told Inspector Sanji
that he thrown the knife into a bush near the house. Inspector Sanji had recovered the
knife inside the bush.

Analyse the above facts and determine the admissibility of the statement made by
Luffy to Corporal Ace, ASP Nami and Inspector Sanji.
(25 marks)

(Total: 25 Marks)

Continued…

RM/MAA 4/5
UCP4612 CRIMINAL PROCEDURE I 27 NOVEMBER 2021

PART B:

Instruction: Attempt ONE question only.

QUESTION 4A

The four accused in this case ('A1, A2, A3 and A4') were charged, in furtherance of
their common intention, with the murder of a woman (Nina Naomi), her driver, a
lawyer and a banker on a farm in Kota Tinggi, Johor, between 8.30pm and 9.45pm on
30 August 2021.

Based on the facts above, with reference to statutory provisions and case law address
the issues below:
(a) Determine on whether the trial against the four accused person can be proceeded
jointly.
(15 marks)

(b) A1 was charged together with the other three (3) accused person for the murder of
the woman (Nina Naomi). Draft a charge against A1.
(10 marks)

(25 Marks)

OR

QUESTION 4B

“…….this discretionary power must be exercised judicially. In order for this court to
exercise its discretionary power, this court must be satisfied that there are sufficient
materials before the court to consider or justify invoking its powers under s. 158 of
the CPC and it must be invoked only at the appropriate time as expressly regulated
by s. 158 of the CPC. The procedure expressly regulated by s. 158 of the CPC cannot
be varied by consent or be waived.”

[In the case of PP v Azwan & Another Case [2007] 10 CLJ 469, VT Singham J
opined]

Examine the legal issues applicable to the process of amending a charge.

(Total: 25 Marks)

End of Page

RM/MAA 5/5

You might also like