ShortNotes Ethics VyasIAS KING R QUEEN P
ShortNotes Ethics VyasIAS KING R QUEEN P
ShortNotes Ethics VyasIAS KING R QUEEN P
Table of Content
1. Introduction
2. Sources of Ethics
3. Importance of Ethics in Human Life
4. Essence of Ethics
5. Determinants of Ethics
6. Analysis of Determinants of Ethics
7. Consequences of Ethics in Human Action
8. Fundamental Objectives of Ethics
9. Four Critical Principles of Ethics
10. Morality
11. Difference between Ethics and morality
Introduction
Ethics is a system of moral principles. They affect how people make decisions and lead their
lives. Ethics is concerned with what is good for individuals and society and is also described as
moral philosophy.
Ethics constitute the systematic enquiry into understanding the justification to act honestly when
they can be dishonest and get rewarded.
• Ethics is thus the philosophical study of morality-Motivation based on ideas of right and
wrong.
• It is a study of what are good and bad ends to pursue in life and what it is right and wrong to
do in the conduct of life.
• It is therefore, above all, a practical
discipline. Its primary aim is to determine
how one ought to live and what actions
one ought to do in the conduct of one's life.
Origin of Ethics
• Nicomachean Ethics of Aristotle: Ethics can be traced back to ancient Greek philosophy,
specifically Aristotle’s works. “Nicomachean Ethics,” by Aristotle, is a comprehensive
exploration of ethical theory and practice. •
• Aristotle delves into the nature of virtue, moral character, and the pursuit of a good life in
this work, laying the groundwork for ethical inquiry and providing invaluable insights into
the origins and study of ethics.
• Ethics is derived from the Greek word ethos and the Latin word mores, which mean
“custom,” “ways of behaviour,” or “human character.”
Sources of Ethics
• Religious and Spiritual Beliefs
• Philosophical Ethics
• Cultural and Societal Norms
• Professional Codes of Ethics
• Ethical Principles and Theories
• Human Rights and International
Standards
Essence of Ethics
The intrinsic quality of something that determines its
character is referred to as its essence. The essence of ethics
represents its characteristics, significance, benefits.
• Constitution: Constitution provides broad principles that govern what kind of laws, and
legislatures may be enacted and what sort of actions administrators can take. Example:
Fairness, Justice, equality, nondiscrimination, and duty to protect the environment are some
ethical values provided in the Indian constitution which need to be imbibed by all members
of Indian society in general and the state in particular.
• Governance: The government creates laws and policies that incentivize one type of behaviour
while discouraging another type of behaviour. Such an incentive structure shapes people’s
ethical standards as well as their adherence to them. Example: The Swachh Bharat Abhiyan
has influenced people’s ethical standards in favour of cleanliness and sanitation.
• Judiciary: The judiciary lays down ethical standards through various judgments,
pronouncements, and guidelines. Example: In the Sabarimala temple case, the Supreme
Court of India upheld the right to equality. Vishakha Guidelines of 1997 materialised as
legislation on the Prevention of Sexual Harassment of Women at Workplaces ensuring
women’s safety and promoting gender parity.
• Improves individual
End-based Principle
• This ethical principle is based on the notion of the consequence of actions. Thus, an action is
undertaken only when it produces some positive results or utility. This is often termed as
consequentialism or utilitarianism.
Care-based Principle
• It is revered as the golden rule in ethics. In this
rule, the action of an agent is based on care and
compassion. Thus, if an accident victim is lying on
the road, your involvement may bring less utility
as it will involve time and money to give him the
necessary medical care, and the consequences.
Morality
• Morality refers to the set of standards that enable
people to live cooperatively in groups. It’s what
societies determine to be “right” and “acceptable.”
Table of Content
1. Dimensions of Ethics
2. Descriptive Ethics
3. Meta Ethics
4. Normative Ethics/ Prescriptive Ethics
5. Applied Ethics
Dimensions of Ethics
Every day we come across several ethical and moral dilemmas in our daily life. Dealing with these moral issues is often
perplexing. How should we think through an ethical issue? Philosophers have developed different approaches to deal
with moral issues.
Descriptive Ethics
The study of people's moral beliefs is
known as descriptive ethics.
• It necessitates empirical
research. It provides us with a
general pattern or way of life of people in various communities.
• The history and evolution of ethics are studied in descriptive ethics. It keeps track of taboos, customs, and
conventions. Descriptive Ethics may be seen in Kohlberg’s idea of moral awareness.
• Descriptive ethics looks into people's ethical ideals or the actions that are prohibited in a society. Its goal is to
learn about people's values, which actions are right and wrong, and which moral agent characteristics are
virtuous.
• Descriptive ethics seeks to explain moral agents' actual choices in practice. It looks into the ethical codes
followed by various groups. It is an empirical study of people's moral.
• It is a value-free approach to ethics. It does not make judgments about the morality of the practices and beliefs
but simply describes the practices observed in the different groups or cultures.
Meta Ethics
• “Meta-ethics is the attempt to understand the metaphysical, epistemological, semantic, and psychological,
presuppositions and commitments of moral thought, talk, and practice.”
• Metaethics, as studied by scholars such as J.L. Mackie, investigates the nature and foundations of ethics itself.
• It looks into the meaning of moral language, the objectivity of moral claims, and the nature of moral truths.
• Metaethics seeks to comprehend the philosophical underpinnings of ethics and the concepts involved.
• Investigate the underlying principles of ethical values: The study of the origin and meaning of ethical concepts
is known as metaethics. It examines where our ethical principles originate and what they imply. It attempts to
investigate the underlying principles of ethical values. •
• Focuses on the meaning of ethical terms: It focuses on the meaning of ethical terms rather than the applied
question of ‘what should be done in a specific situation?’ It is not concerned with whether an action is good or
bad, but rather with the goodness and badness of morality itself. It addresses issues such as “What do we mean
by “freedom” and “determinism”? •
• Meta-
ethical
philosophie
s include
Moral
nihilism,
moral
objectivis
m, moral
subjectivis
m, and
moral
relativism.
Branches of Meta-ethics
I. Ethical Cognitivism
• Ethical
Cognitivism is a
metaethical
theory
according to
which
(1) Moral
judgements can
express beliefs
and
(2) They are
truth-apt, which
means the
statements can be described as true or false.
• Psychological Cognitivism advocates that a moral statement is an utterance of our belief about a moral action.
• The view that moral statements can be true or false is known as Semantic Cognitivism. According to the
Semantic Cognitivists, our moral statements are made true or false based on how accurately they refer to the
specific moral aspect of the world.
• Ethical Cognitivists take the views of psychological cognitivism and semantic cognitivism together.
Ethical cognitivism includes moral realism, moral subjectivism and error theory.
CALL 8851628134 FOR MORE INFORMATION 2
ETHICS PART -2 BY VYASA IAS
A) Moral Realism
• Moral realism holds that the moral statements express a belief and these beliefs are regarded as mind-
independent facts of the world. We find two basic premises of moral realism, one is that moral facts exist and
second is that the moral facts exist independently of human mind
Moral realism is divided into two varieties: ethical naturalism and ethical non-naturalism.
i. Ethical Naturalism
• Ethical naturalism holds that there are objective and natural moral properties. They hold that we have
empirical knowledge of the moral truths.
B) Moral Subjectivism
• Moral Subjectivism holds that there are no objective moral properties and it is, therefore, a form of moral anti-
realism.
• According to moral subjectivism moral statements are made true of false by the attitudes or conventions of the
people
Ethical subjectivism includes ideal observer theory and divine command theory
C) Error Theory
• Error theory holds a view that ethical statements can be propositions, but that all ethical propositions are
false. It means that we are generally in error when we make any moral statement.
• The prominent proponent of error theory was J. L. Mackie. He advocates that our moral utterances are
expressions of those beliefs that have truth-value (Truth-apt belief; belief that can be classified either as true or
as false). But he rejects realist position that states that these utterances always correspond with the external
world.
The theories which are included in ethical non-cognitivism are: emotivism, quasi realism and universal prescriptivism.
A) Emotivism
• Emotivism is a view that ethical sentences express only emotional expressions of one’s own attitudes.
• A. J. Ayer and C. L. Stevenson were the defenders of emotivism. According to Emotivism moral statement that
“murder is wrong” is simply an expression of emotion against the act of murdering.
• A. J. Ayer claims that moral statements have no factual meanings. Moral utterances or statements are not
proposition. That is why moral utterances cannot be classified as true or false. He states in “The Emotive Theory
of Ethics”.
B) Quasi Realism
• Quasi realism is a metaethical view with the claim that ethical utterances are the projection of emotional
attitudes or emotions as if emotions are real properties. They do not express propositions.
• This view is defended by Simon Blackburn. Simon holds that it may be possible that there is no ethical fact in
the world that correspond to ethical statements, but linguistically ethical statements behave as if they are
factual claims and that is why they can be appropriately regarded as true or false.
C) Universal Prescriptivism
• Universal Prescriptivism is a metaethical view which holds that ethical sentences work as imperatives and these
imperatives are universalised.
• R. M. Hare is a defender of this theory. He states that moral utterances express more than just emotional
approval and disapproval.
• Moral utterances express subjective prescription. They are prescriptive in nature. When someone utters a
moral judgement or statement, he or she wants the other to act in accordance with his or her moral judgement.
Normative ethics, which has been extensively studied by scholars such as John Stuart Mill, focuses on providing
guidelines for determining what is right and wrong.
• Its goal is to create ethical theories and principles that will aid individuals in making moral judgments and
decisions.
• The goal of normative ethics is to establish moral standards and assess the morality of human behaviour.
• Examines ethical theories: It is an examination of ethical theories that prescribe how people should act and
behave in society. If someone violates established standards, there are provisions for punishment as well as
justification for the same.
• Examines standards of actions: It looks into standards for the rightness and wrongness of actions and is more
concerned with ‘who ought one to be’ than with the ethics of a specific issue. If someone violates established
standards, there are provisions for punishment as well as justification.
• Examines how basic moral standards are established: The central question in normative ethics is how basic
moral standards are established and justified.
Normative ethical theories are classified into three main groups teleological, deontological and virtue ethics theories.
Teleological Ethics
• Teleology finds its etymology in the Greek word ‘telos’ which means “end” and logos, “science”.
• The teleological approach is also called “consequentialism”. It determines the moral worth of any action by
the consequences or outcomes of that action.
✓ An action is good if its consequences are good; an action is wrong if its consequences are bad.
✓ Hence, for judging an action morally, we have to consider its actual or likely results. Ethical egoism and
utilitarianism are teleological.
• Teleological moral theories locate moral goodness in the consequences of our behavior and not the behavior
itself.
✓ According to teleological (or consequentialist) moral theory, all rational human actions are teleological in
the sense that we reason about the means of achieving certain ends. Moral behavior, therefore, is goal-
directed.
• Example: From a teleological standpoint, stealing could not be judged inherently right or wrong independent of
the context and the foreseeable consequences. Suppose one is contemplating stealing a loaf of bread from the
neighborhood grocery store.
• Many moral theorists would argue that morality requires an analysis of my motives (or intent) that brought
about that behavior.
✓ However, from a teleological perspective, motives really have nothing to do with the rightness or wrongness
of the act. What really matters lies in the potential pains and pleasures associated with the short-term and
long-term consequences.
✓ If thief’s children were starving, and if stealing a loaf of bread would immediately prevent them from
starving, then the act might be called moral.
Merits of Utilitarianism
• Larger
interest of
Society: It emphasizes collective happiness.
• Distributed justice: Budget is a way of income
distribution based on utilitarianism, like taking higher tax from
the rich and using it for the welfare of the poor.
• Utilitarianism is easy to implement.
Demerits of Utilitarianism
• It gives primacy to the happiness of the majority over that of the minority.
• It ignores 'altruism' however, many people are involved in social service. As society is the cradle of man.
• It focuses on 'end' only while ignoring means, but Gandhiji said "means and end cannot be separated from each
other".
• It is materialistic in its orientation and has reduced human to animal level.
• Utilitarianism is pro-status quo. It is against social reforms because it validates popular opinion.
Deontology
• Duty-based system of ethics: Deontology is a dutybased system of ethics that holds that some acts are
intrinsically right or wrong regardless of their consequences and that moral agents have duties to obey moral
commands or rules regardless of their consequences.
• Uses rules to distinguish between right and wrong: Deontology is an ethical theory that uses rules to determine
what is right and wrong.
✓ Immanuel Kant is frequently associated with deontology. Kant believed that ethical actions must adhere to
universal moral laws such as “Do not lie.” “Don’t steal anything”. “Do not deceive.”
• Follow the rules and duties: Deontology is a simple concept to grasp. It simply requires that people follow the
rules and perform their duties. This approach corresponds to our natural intuition about what is and isn’t
ethical.
• Does not evaluate actions based on their
outcomes: Unlike consequentialism, which
evaluates actions based on their outcomes,
deontology does not necessitate weighing
the costs and benefits of a situation.
Subjectivity and uncertainty are avoided
because only set rules must be followed.
Virtue Ethics
• Aristotelian virtue ethics emphasises the development of virtuous character traits as the foundation of ethical
behaviour.
• It emphasises the importance of virtuous individuals in creating a flourishing society by emphasising the
development of qualities such as courage, justice, and temperance to guide moral decision-making.
• Plato believed that only philosophers should rule the world because they have knowledge received through the
intellectual perception of the soul.
• Character-based approach to ethics: It focuses on the development of good character traits, or virtues, as the
foundation for moral behaviour.
• Acquired through practice and habit: The more we practice being honest, just, courageous, and so on, the more
likely we are to become virtuous people.
• Not rules or principles: They are more like dispositions
or tendencies to act in certain ways. For example, the virtue of
courage is not a rule that says “Always do what is dangerous.” It
is a disposition to face danger with determination and resolve.
• Concerned with the good life: It is not only about doing
the right thing but also about living a meaningful and fulfilling
life.
Applied ethics refers to the practical application of moral and ethical theories in real life. It focuses on resolving 'moral
dilemmas on different issues using ethical principles like utilitarianism, deontological ethics, virtue ethics, case ethics
and altruism.
Normative Principles in Applied Ethics – These are the most widely utilised principles in the field of applied ethics. Here
are a few examples:
• Social benefit – recognise the extent to which activity has a positive impact on society.
• Personal benefit – recognise the amount to which activity has a positive impact on the individual in the issue.
• Principle of paternalism – assisting others in achieving their best interests when they are unable to do it
themselves.
• Principle of harm – do not cause harm to others.
• Principle of benevolence – help families in need.
• Principle of lawfulness – one should not break the law.
• Principle of honesty – do not deceive people
• Principle of justice – recognise a person’s right to due process, fair compensation for damage done and
equitable sharing of benefits.
• Principle of autonomy – recognises a person’s freedom over his activities or physical body.
• Rights – Recognise a person’s rights to life, information, privacy, freedom of speech and safety.
Table of Content
• Trust: Trust is the foundation upon which your relationship can withstand the most difficult of times. In fact, you
cannot sustain a long-term relationship without trust. One of the causes of relationship breakdown is a lack of
trust. •
• Mutual respect: It is beneficial in remaining compassionate, committed, truthful, and honest. Strengthens the
relationship and treats each other fairly. •
• Law of Integrity: The law of integrity states that a person should not lie and keep his promises. •
• Law of Improvement: If a mistake is made, the person should try to improve on it.
• Gratitude: If anyone has helped, the person should remember that.
• Loyalty: Devotion to one’s partner and family members.
• Love: Loving everything, even if it has flaws.
• Fidelity: This is a key driver of marital relationships and the essence of marriage ethics. It refers to remaining
faithful to one’s life partner while avoiding sensual distractions or committing adultery.
• Confidentiality: In order to keep private relationships sacred, secrecy and privacy are essential.
• Accountability & Responsibility: In private relationships, one is bestowed with various responsibilities such as
responsibility towards a child, life partner, parents, and so on. This necessitates fulfilling one’s responsibility to
them as well as being accountable to them in the event of failure to do so.
Ethics in public relations refers to the ethical values or moral standards that an individual adheres to in his or her
professional interactions and business dealings. Power governs ethics in public relationships.
• Important values critical to the integrity of any profession: Advocacy, honesty, selflessness, expertise,
openness, accountability, fairness, and other core values are required to guide human actions and are critical to
the integrity of any profession
• Moral Compass for Resolving Conflicts of Interest: Creating a moral compass for navigating ethical quandaries
and resolving conflicts of interest. Personal life frequently has an impact on an individual’s work and role in
public spheres of life.
• Contributes to the humanization of public relations: Ethics in private relationships contributes to the
humanization of public relations and plays an important role in the formation of a person’s moral system. If
someone values honesty in his personal life, he is likely to be honest in his public life as well.
• Responsible advocacy and communications: Personal values are translated into responsible advocacy and
communications through responsible advocacy and communications.
• Social well-being: This Entails sustaining authority,
developing and enhancing public trust in the system, and
achieving societal well-being.
• Effective and balanced decision making: Aids in making more
fair and balanced decisions.
• Office/ institution/ organization credibility: Ethical public
relations requires maintaining transparency when dealing
with any information, sensitive or not. Blurring the lines
between fact and fiction can erode credibility and tarnish the
reputation of an office/ institution/organization.
• Trustworthy relationships with people: Through trust, an
organisation can build solid relationships with various stakeholders, which can be gained by always taking an
ethical approach. Following the Code of Ethics can aid in the development of much-needed trust between
organisations and the general public.
• Courtesy: This is extremely important in the official conduct of civil servants in India. This creates a sense of
belonging among the general public.
• Spirit of service: This is essential in order to serve the purpose of service. Civil servants are expected to go above
and beyond the call of duty in order to serve the public interest. This provides the individual with inner
satisfaction while also inspiring his colleagues to meet the service goals.
Civil servants’ morale has been deteriorating in recent years. Following are the prominent reasons:
• Lack of accountability and responsibility
• Sacrificing ethics, values, integrity, and spiritualism
• Social Acceptance: Society as a whole has begun to accept corrupt individuals
• Mega Administration, slow methodology, and decision-making delay
• Soft society, tolerant public opinion, and the nexus of politics, business, and bureaucracy
Negative:
• Spillover: When people are preoccupied with the public, they continue to behave in the same manner in their
private space.
• Time management: Excessive involvement in public life frequently forces people to sacrifice time from their
private lives, which has a negative impact on their private relationships.
Positive:
• Interpersonal relationships: Private relationships teach people values like love, care, empathy, and so on, which
they can then replicate in their public relationships to improve their quality.
• Positive mood: People who have smooth and happy private relationships are more satisfied, which allows them
to behave better in public. This is the reasoning behind the adage “Happy wife, happy life.”
Negative:
• Stress: Tensions in private relationships with friends, family, spouses, and others cause stress and have a
negative impact on public behaviour. Healthy private relationships are a basic requirement that must be met in
order to have good public relationships
• Prejudice: Private relationships frequently permeate the public sphere.
• Honesty: Both types of relationships expect truthful behaviour, without which trust and confidence are lost.
Marriage, for example, as well as superiorsubordinate relationships, necessitate loyalty
• Interpersonal factors: Both relationships are not mechanical, but rather involve interpersonal behaviour. As a
result, both require individuals to have basic sensitivity, empathy, care, and so on in order for both parties to
better understand each other
• Accountability: In both relationships, we are held accountable for our actions. To maintain trust and confidence,
we must answer for and account for our actions.
• Compassion: Helping others is a good deed that is desired in both public and private relationships.
Table of Content
1. Values
2. Role of Family in Value Inculcation
3. Role of Educational Institutions in Value Inculcation
4. Role of Society
5. Human Values
6. Human Values - lessons from the lives and teachings of great leaders, reformers and administrators
Values
Values are broad preferences regarding appropriate courses of action or outcomes. As a result, values reflect an
individual’s sense of right and wrong, or
what “ought” to be. It establishes a
crucial aspect of one’s self-concept and
operates as a person’s guiding principles.
Features of Values
• Standard of morality - it
is essentially guiding
principle of life.
• Values are central to human personalities.
• Values are more
abstract in nature but
form the 'basis' of
behaviour.
• Values are relatively
stable and enduring, yet
any intense incident in
life can change the value
system.
• It could be 'Means' or
'End' both like 'honesty'
is end value and 'education is its means value.
• When 'core belief and emotions are combined, it become value Values
Importance of Values
• Guides Human Behaviour: Values are the principles and fundamental convictions that serve as a general guide
to behaviour. Attitudes and behaviour are influenced by values.
• Driving Force in Ethical Decision-Making: Values are universally recognized as a driving force in ethical decision-
making. They serve as the foundation for their intentional activities and influence an individual’s choices.
• Internal Reference for Good Living: Personal values provide an internal reference for what is good, beneficial,
important, useful, beautiful, desirable, and constructive in life.
• Helps Differentiate between what is Right and Wrong: All values have effective, cognitive, and directional
aspects that guide us in deciding what is right and wrong.
• Promotes Peace and Stability: Human values are a tool for managing human relations and a tool for peace when
tensions are high. Values enable us to live in harmony with one another and to contribute to peace on a
personal level.
• Values Extend beyond Specific Actions and situations: Values extend beyond specific actions and situations.
According to the National Education Policy, education is the most effective tool for instilling values in children. In the
first year of life, a school is a place where systematic learning takes place. School gives children the most opportunities
and exposure.
• In addition, a child is introduced for the first time in school to members of the community other than his family,
such as his peers, pupils, teachers, and other staff. This teaches the child how to regulate his behaviour in
society.
• Imparting a strong value system: The major task of
parents is to inculcate values in their children. However,
teachers and schools play an important role in this as
students spend more time in schools and institutions.
Students learn how to behave in society at schools and, later,
in colleges. The role of peer ground can’t be written off and
Role of Society
The Society is at the centre of informal learning that ensures members’ inheritance. It embraces the child’s development
with love and a sense of possessiveness, teaching the child to value societal patterns and philosophy.
• Society Imparts Values through Social Tradition: Values of intimacy, language, love, equality, desires to live,
action, behaviour, morality, unity, attachment, and jealousy are all values carried through social tradition. These
Human Values
Basic human values refer to those values which are at the core of being human. The values which are considered basic
inherent values in humans include truth, honesty, loyalty, love, peace, etc. because they bring out the fundamental
goodness of human beings and society at large.
The five human values which are expected in all human beings, irrespective of whether they are employees or not in
whichever profession or service, are:
• Right Conduct – Contains values like self-help skills (modesty, self-reliance, hygiene etc.), social skills (good
behavior, good manners, environment awareness etc.), ethical skills (courage, efficiency, initiative, punctuality
etc.) and Ownership.
• Peace – Contains values like equality, focus, humility, optimism, patience, self-confidence, selfcontrol, self-
esteem etc.
• Truth – Contains values like accuracy, fairness, honesty, justice, quest for knowledge, determination etc.
Human Values - lessons from the lives and teachings of great leaders, reformers and administrators
We are fortunate to have many great leaders, reformers, and administrators who cherished noble values and ethics.
They not only lived an ethical life but also taught many human values.
Let’s have a quick look at the lessons from the lives of eminent persons.
• Mahatma Gandhi: What he valued – Simplicity, Minimalism, Satyagraha, Sarvodaya, Secularism, Ahimsa, Non-
Violence, Truth, Forgiveness, Self-Sufficiency, Dignity of labour etc.
• Jawaharlal Nehru: What he valued – democracy, institution building, consensus building, socialism, secularism,
self-determination, internationalism etc.
• Nelson Mandela: What he valued – service, dignity, self-belief, equality of the human race, freedom, fairness,
justice, etc.
• Abraham Lincoln: What he valued – humanism, equality of the human race, integrity, idealism, honesty,
freedom etc.
• Martin Luther King Jr: What he valued – self-belief, equality of the human race etc.
• Raja Rammohan Roy: What he valued – social equality, equality of the human race, women empowerment,
scientific thinking etc.
• Swami Vivekananda: What he valued – self-belief, equality of the human race, patriotism, compassion etc.
• B R Ambedkar: What he valued – self-belief, equality of the human race, radical thinking, compassion etc.
• Mother Teresa: What she valued – compassion, altruism, helpfulness, kindness, cleanliness, determination.
• Verghese Kurien: What he valued – self-belief, co-operative societies, entrepreneurship, innovation, farmer
welfare etc.
• M.S. Swaminathan: What he valued – sustainable development, green revolution, poverty alleviation, farmer
welfare etc.
• Sam Pitroda: What he valued – self-belief, dreaming big, entrepreneurship, policy making, innovation etc.
• E. Sreedharan: What he valued – punctuality, self-belief, integrity, high-quality standards etc.