Clinical and Histopathological Investigation of Odontomas - Review of The Literature and Presentation of 160 Cases
Clinical and Histopathological Investigation of Odontomas - Review of The Literature and Presentation of 160 Cases
Clinical and Histopathological Investigation of Odontomas - Review of The Literature and Presentation of 160 Cases
70:1358-1361, 2012
Purpose: The purpose of the present study was to evaluate the clinical and histopathologic aspects of
different types of odontomas.
Materials and Methods: One hundred sixty odontoma cases sent to the Institute of Oncology,
Department of Tumor Pathology, Istanbul University from 1971 through 2010 were investigated. These
tumors were compared by age of patient, gender of patient, localization, histopathologic type, clinical
diagnosis, and clinical and microscopic features.
Results: Odontomas were classified histopathologically as complex, compound, or mixed. Of all investi-
gated cases, 99 were complex, 57 were compound, and 4 were mixed odontomas. The mean age at diagnosis
was 27.9 years, and odontomas were diagnosed most frequently at 10 to 19 years of age.
Conclusions: From the perspective of community health, the presence of odontomas within the jaws
is important because these constitute 21% to 67% of all odontogenic tumors. The present study showed
2 interesting findings that differed from previous studies. These are the lower incidence rate of
odontomas within the category of odontogenic tumors and the higher incidence of complex odontomas
over compound odontomas.
© 2012 American Association of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgeons
J Oral Maxillofac Surg 70:1358-1361, 2012
1358
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en La Salle University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 24, 2024. Para uso personal
exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SOLUK TEKKESIN ET AL 1359
Age (yrs)
Gender 0–9 10–19 20–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–69 ⬎70 Total
Female 3 26 24 12 4 7 3 1 80
Male 4 25 20 16 3 8 3 1 80
Total 7 51 44 28 7 15 6 2 160
Soluk Tekkesin et al. Investigation of Odontomas. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012.
densely calcified bodies in a single focus, whereas ameloblastic fibroma, dentinoblastoma, odontogenic tu-
complex odontomas appear as an irregular amor- mor, or radicular cyst.
phous radiopaque mass when calcification is com- Histopathologic diagnosis was compared with clin-
plete. These may appear radiolucent during the early ical and microscopic features: analysis of the presence
stages of tumor development.2,7 of symptoms and histopathologic findings, tumor
The pathogenesis is not clear, but trauma during found with a buried tooth, missing tooth, malformed
primary dentition, heredity, and genetic mutations are tooth/fusion, adhesion to a root, erupted, paresthesia,
accepted possible etiologic factors.8 Odontomas can follicle, odontogenic cyst, odontogenic epithelium,
also manifest as part of some syndromes: Gardner ameloblastic epithelium, odontogenic mesenchyme,
syndrome, Hermann syndrome, familial colonic ade- ghost cells, cementicle, ameloblastic odonto-fibroma/
nomatosis, and basal cell nevus syndrome.8,9 fibroma, infection, or inflammation. To determine the
Odontomas should be removed by conservative localization of odontomas, the upper and lower jaws
surgery because they have very low growth potential were divided into anatomic regions: maxillary ante-
and enucleation or surgical excision is curative. Re- rior, premolar, and molar and mandibular anterior,
currence is unusual. premolar, and molar.
The present study was designed to present the This was a retrospective study and thus exempt
epidemiologic features of odontomas in Istanbul and from approval by the local institutional review board.
discuss findings from the literature. All data analysis and graphs were performed using
Microsoft Office Excel 2007 (Microsoft, Redmond,
Materials and Methods WA).
Age (yrs)
Diagnosis 0–9 10–19 20–29 30–39 40–49 50–59 60–69 ⬎70 Total
Complex 1 28 31 19 5 10 4 2 99
Compound 5 20 13 9 2 5 2 0 57
Mix 1 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 4
Total 7 (4.4%) 51 (31.9%) 44 (27.5%) 28 (17.5%) 7 (4.4%) 15 (9.4%) 6 (3.7%) 2 (1.2%) 160
Soluk Tekkesin et al. Investigation of Odontomas. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en La Salle University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 24, 2024. Para uso personal
exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
1360 INVESTIGATION OF ODONTOMAS
Maxilla Mandible
Diagnosis No. of Cases Anterior Premolar Molar Anterior Premolar Molar
Complex 99 12 3 10 6 6 62
Compound 57 19 6 2 17 5 8
Mix 4 3 0 0 0 0 1
Total 160 (100%) 34 (21.3%) 9 (5.6%) 12 (7.5%) 23 (14.4%) 11 (6.9%) 71 (44.3%)
Soluk Tekkesin et al. Investigation of Odontomas. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2012.
In general, the mandible (105 cases, 65.6%) was were complex odontomas (Table 2), similar to reports
more commonly involved than the maxilla (55 cases, by Amado et al17 and Hisatomi et al.18
34.3%) with all odontomas. Complex odontomas Complex odontomas were found most frequently
were found most frequently in the mandibular poste- in the posterior mandibular region. Compound odon-
rior region (62 cases); compound odontomas and tomas were found to show a slight preference for the
mixed odontomas were found most commonly in the anterior part of the maxilla, as in reports by Ochse-
anterior maxillary region (19 cases). Table 3 summa- nius et al,13 Mosqueda-Taylor et al,15 and Philipsen et
rizes the localization of odontomas according to his- al.19
topathologic type. One hundred thirty-four of 160 histopathologically
Of the 160 odontoma cases, 158 were sent with a diagnosed odontoma cases were also diagnosed as
different clinical diagnosis to the department, odontoma by clinical examination and panoramic
whereas only 2 cases were not diagnosed clinically. film. The incidence of a correct clinical diagnosis of
One hundred thirty-four of 160 cases were diagnosed odontoma was 83.75%. The percentages of correct
clinically as odontoma. clinical diagnosis of both types of odontomas were
Seventeen different features were found according
to radiologic, histopathologic, or clinical features ob-
served during surgery in 77 cases of odontoma. A Table 4. PREDOMINANT CLINICAL AND
differentiation of these features according to odon- MICROSCOPIC FEATURES
toma type is presented in Table 4.
Features Complex Compound Mixed Total
Retention of 7 5 1 13
Discussion permanent
Odontomas are classified as benign mixed odonto- teeth
Agenesis of 0 1 0 1
genic tumors in the World Health Organization clas- permanent
sification, but are thought to be developmental anom- teeth
alies rather than benign neoplasms.3,10,11 However, Malformed teeth/ 4 0 0 4
several studies have examined large series of these fusion
tumors, and odontomas have been identified as the Attached to teeth 5 0 0 5
Root resorption 0 1 0 1
most frequent odontogenic tumor.12-15 An odontoma Erupted 1 0 1 2
incidence of 21% was found and was the second most Paresthesia 2 0 0 2
common tumor in a previous study on odontogenic Follicle 7 5 1 13
tumors.16 This is much lower than rates in series from Odontogenic cyst 7 5 0 12
the United States14 and Canada.12 Odontogenic 12 7 1 20
epithelium
In the present study, odontomas were histopatho- Ameloblastic 4 2 0 6
logically classified as complex, compound, or mixed. epithelium
Complex odontomas accounted for 61.8%, com- Odontogenic 2 4 0 6
pound odontomas accounted for 35.6%, and mixed mesenchyme
odontomas accounted for 2.5% of all investigated Ghost cell 4 4 2 10
Cementicle 3 3 0 6
cases. The incidence of odontomas was found to be Areas similar to 3 2 0 5
equal (50%) in male and female patients, in accord ameloblastic
with results of some studies.15,17 The mean age at fibroma
diagnosis was 27.9 years. Odontomas were found Inflammation 7 1 0 8
most frequently at 10 to 19 years of age. Compound Soluk Tekkesin et al. Investigation of Odontomas. J Oral Maxil-
odontomas were diagnosed at a younger age than lofac Surg 2012.
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en La Salle University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 24, 2024. Para uso personal
exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.
SOLUK TEKKESIN ET AL 1361
found to be equal. Compound odontomas were more 2. Regezzi JA, Sciubba JJ, Jordan RCK: Oral Pathology: Clinical
Pathologic Correlations (ed 5). Philadelphia, WB Saunders,
easily diagnosed clinically. In contrast, complex odon-
2008, p 277
tomas were confused with mainly cementoid tumors 3. Cawson RA, Odell EW: Cawson’s Essentials of Oral Pathology
and several other lesions clinically. and Oral Medicine. Edinburgh, Churchill Livingstone, 2008, p
As to the frequency of the different types of odon- 115
4. Isler SC, Demircan S, Soluk M, et al: Radiologic evaluation of an
tomas, the present study showed a clear predomi- unusually sized complex odontoma involving the maxillary
nance of complex odontomas over compound odon- sinus by cone beam computed tomography. Quintessence Int
tomas, in contrast to other studies9,19,20 that found 40:533, 2009
5. Singer SR, Mupparapu M, Milles M, et al: Unusually large com-
more compound than complex odontomas. plex odontoma in maxillary sinus associated with unerupted
In the present study, in some cases, odontomas tooth. Report of case and review of literature. N Y State Dent
displayed special clinical and radiologic features, eg, J 73:51, 2007
occurring with an impacted tooth, crown, an abnor- 6. Junquera L, de Vicente JC, Roig P, et al: Intraosseous odontoma
erupted into the oral cavity: An unusual pathology. Med Oral
mal or fused tooth, absence of a tooth, in contact with Patol Oral Cir Bucal 10:248, 2005
a deciduous or permanent tooth, or eruption of the 7. Slootweg PJ: Lesions of the jaws. Histopathology 54:401, 2009
odontoma. Odontomas also caused root resorption of 8. Iatrou I, Vardas E, Theologie-Lygidakis N, et al: A retrospective
analysis of the characteristics, treatment and follow-up of 26
the above tooth or paresthesia. The most frequent odontomas in Greek children. J Oral Sci 52:439, 2010
clinical manifestation was the retention of permanent 9. Hidalgo-Sánchez O, Leco-Berrocal MI, Martínez-González JM:
teeth, in accord with a study by Hidalgo-Sánchez et Meta-analysis of the epidemiology and clinical manifestations of
al.9 odontomas. Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal 13:E730, 2008
10. Tomizawa M, Otsuka Y, Noda T: Clinical observations of odon-
In some cases, several histopathologic features tomas in Japanese children: 39 cases including one recurrent
such as inflammation, follicle or odontogenic cyst case. Int J Paediatr Dent 15:37, 2005
formation, the presence of primitive odontogenic ep- 11. Kramer IRH, Pindorg JJ, Shear M: Histological Typing of Odon-
togenic Tumours. Berlin, Springer-Verlag, 1992
ithelium, ameloblastic epithelium, odontogenic mesen- 12. Daley TD, Wysocki GP, Pringle GA: Relative incidence of odon-
chymal tissue, ghost cells, cementicles, areas similar to togenic tumors and oral and jaw cysts in a Canadian popula-
ameloblastic fibroma, and ameloblastic fibro-odontoma tion. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol 77:276, 1994
near odontomas were observed. The presence of prim- 13. Ochsenius G, Ortega A, Godoy L, et al: Odontogenic tumors in
Chile: A study of 362 cases. J Oral Pathol Med 31:415, 2002
itive odontogenic epithelium and ameloblastic epithe- 14. Regezi JA, Kerr DA, Courtney RM: Odontogenic tumors: Anal-
lium was seen more frequently in complex odontomas, ysis of 706 cases. J Oral Surg 36:771, 1978
whereas the presence of odontogenic mesenchymal tis- 15. Mosqueda-Taylor A, Ledesma-Montes C, Caballero-Sandoval S,
et al: Odontogenic tumors in Mexico: A collaborative retro-
sue was more frequent in the compound type. Ghost spective study of 349 cases. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol
cells constitute 20% of cells found in odontomas,21 and Oral Radiol Endod 84:672, 1997
these cells were observed in 10 of the present cases. 16. Olgac V, Koseoglu BG, Aksakalli N: Odontogenic tumours in
Istanbul: 527 cases. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg 44:386, 2006
From the perspective of community health, the
17. Amado Cuesta S, Gargallo Albiol J, Berini Aytés L, et al: Review
presence of odontomas within the jaws is important of 61 cases of odontoma. Presentation of an erupted complex
because they constitute 21% to 67% of all odonto- odontoma. Med Oral 8:366, 2003
genic tumors. The present study showed 2 interesting 18. Hisatomi M, Asaumi JI, Konouchi H, et al: A case of complex
odontoma associated with an impacted lower deciduous sec-
findings that differed from previous studies. These are ond molar and analysis of the 107 odontomas. Oral Dis 8:100,
the lower incidence rate of odontomas within the 2002
category of odontogenic tumors and the higher inci- 19. Philipsen HP, Reichart PA, Praetorius F: Mixed odontogenic
tumours and odontomas. Considerations on interrelationship.
dence of complex odontomas over compound odon- Review of the literature and presentation of 134 new cases of
tomas. odontomas. Oral Oncol 33:86, 1997
20. Buchner A, Merrell PW, Carpenter WM: Relative frequency of
central odontogenic tumors: A study of 1,088 cases from
References Northern California and comparison to studies from other parts
1. Praetorius F, Piatelli A: Odontoma, in Barnes L, Eveson JW, of the world. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 64:1343, 2006
Reichart P, et al (eds): WHO Classification of Tumours. Pathol- 21. Lee CH, Park GJ: Complex and compound odontomas are
ogy and Genetics of Head and Neck Tumour (ed 5). Lyon, clinico-pathologic entities. Basic and applied. Pathology 1:30,
IARC, 2005, p 310 2008
Descargado para Anonymous User (n/a) en La Salle University de ClinicalKey.es por Elsevier en mayo 24, 2024. Para uso personal
exclusivamente. No se permiten otros usos sin autorización. Copyright ©2024. Elsevier Inc. Todos los derechos reservados.