0090-3558-45 4 1235
0090-3558-45 4 1235
0090-3558-45 4 1235
BioOne Complete (complete.BioOne.org) is a full-text database of 200 subscribed and open-access titles
in the biological, ecological, and environmental sciences published by nonprofit societies, associations,
museums, institutions, and presses.
Your use of this PDF, the BioOne Complete website, and all posted and associated content indicates your
acceptance of BioOne’s Terms of Use, available at www.bioone.org/terms-of-use.
Usage of BioOne Complete content is strictly limited to personal, educational, and non - commercial use.
Commercial inquiries or rights and permissions requests should be directed to the individual publisher as
copyright holder.
BioOne sees sustainable scholarly publishing as an inherently collaborative enterprise connecting authors, nonprofit
publishers, academic institutions, research libraries, and research funders in the common goal of maximizing access to
critical research.
ABSTRACT: Two species of Phthiraptera, Bo- scrofa]), may be the source of endopara-
vicola caprae (Ischnocera: Bovicolidae) and sites affecting huemul deer (Dı́az and
Solenopotes binipilosus (Anoplura: Linognathi- Smith-Flueck, 2000). Studies of the ecto-
dae), and one species of mite, Psoroptes ovis
(Acari: Psoroptidae), were recorded on huemul parasites of the huemul are scarce, but a
(Hippocamelus bisulcus) in Chile. The sucking goat-chewing louse Bovicola caprae has
louse S. binipilosus and the mite P. ovis are been reported on captive huemul from
reported for the first time from this host. Argentina (Serret, 2001).
Key words: Acari, Bovicola caprae, first Between 14 June and 29 September
record, huemul, lice, mite, Psoroptes ovis,
Solenopotes binipilosus. 2007, 18 huemul (nine adult males and
nine adult females) were live-captured in
Huemul (Hippocamelus bisulcus) is an the vicinity of Cochrane (47u119S,
endemic cervid species of southern Chile 72u299W), Aysén District, Chile, at the
and Argentina. It is listed as endangered Lago Cochrane National Reserve (LCNR).
(IUCN, 2008) as a result of a significant The LCNR was created in 1967 to protect
decline in numbers and a reduction of its southern beech or lenga (Nothofagus pu-
original distribution range. Possible causes milio) forest and a population of huemul.
of the huemul’s decline are poaching, The reserve’s vegetation is classified as
habitat destruction, predation by dogs deciduous forest with a mosaic of shrubs
(Canis familiaris), susceptibility to live- and trees dominated by Antarctic beech or
stock diseases, competition with domestic ñirre (Nothofagus antarctica), along with
animals, and the introduction of exotic stands of N. pumilio and coihue (Nothofa-
species (Povilitis, 1998; Dı́az and Smith- gus dombeyi). There are also old burned
Flueck, 2000; Serret, 2001). It is consid- areas resulting from a fire that occurred in
ered an umbrella species (Hunter, 1996) 1942–45. Much of the reserve used by
and is one of the most vulnerable and least huemul is dominated by steep terrain (23%
known cervids in the world (Smith-Flueck, of the entire area has more than a 45u slope)
2000). The current population of huemul and flat rocky outcrops. Mean annual
is about 1,000–1,500 individuals (Smith- temperature is 7.6 C, and annual precipita-
Flueck, 2000; Serret, 2001). tion is around 805 mm. The 6,925 ha of the
Serret (2001) believes that domestic reserve are surrounded by a private park on
animals (e.g., cattle [Bos taurus], sheep the north and east sides, small sheep farms
[Ovis aries], goats [Capra hircus], horses on the west side, and by Lake Cochrane and
[Equus caballus], and dogs) as well as a river to the south and southeast.
introduced wild mammals (i.e., red deer The 18 huemul were captured and
[Cervus elaphus] and wild boar [Sus chemically immobilized with a combina-
1235
tion of ketamine (,2.0 6 0.7 mg/kg) and showed heavy infestations, causing skin
medetomidine (,0.09 6 0.05 mg/kg), damage manifested by redness, thicken-
followed by the injection of atimpamezole ing, and desquamation. A single animal
(,0.40 6 0.2 mg/kg) as antagonist agent was coinfested with all three species of
(P. Corti and C. Saucedo, unpubl. data). ectoparasites. Negative animals had no
Capture was authorized by the Chile evidence of skin damage due to the
Agricultural Service. After sedation, each ectoparasites, which are easily recognized
animal was placed over a canvas sling in a on affected individuals. Lice were located
sternal position, and both flanks of the mainly on the head, thighs, loins, and
animals were visually examined for ecto- lateral sides of the trunk of the animals.
parasites. Blood samples were collected, The mites were mainly found on the back.
body measurements were taken, and clin- The small total number of both louse
ical examinations were performed. Prior to species (chewing and sucking lice) found
their release, huemul were identified and (n523) in this study was presumably due to
marked with a numbered ear tag, and some the relative low density, small group size,
were tagged with a very high frequency and scattered distribution of huemul in the
(VHF) radio collar. In the laboratory, area (Corti, 2008). Low host numbers,
ectoparasites were separated taxonomically scattered distribution, and small group size
into chewing lice, sucking lice, and mites, are mechanisms that reduce the probability
and sex and developmental stages (i.e., of parasite infestations (Lohele, 1995).
adults or nymphs) were determined using Lice are highly specialized obligate
a stereomicroscope. Ectoparasites were ectoparasites of mammals and birds (John-
fixed and preserved in 70% alcohol. Lice son and Clayton, 2003). The primary host
were slide-mounted in Canada balsam of B. caprae is the domestic goat (includ-
following the technique described by Palma ing goats in Chile; Tagle, 1966), and
(1978), and mites were cleared with Nesbitt infestations have been reported from dead
solution for 72 hr at 55 C, dehydrated with captive huemul in Argentina (Serret,
alcohol, and slide-mounted in Berlesse 2001) and Chile (Povilitis, 1998). Because
mixture (Krantz, 1978). All specimens were several developmental stages (nymphs,
deposited in the collection of the Zoology males and female) were found on the
Department at the Universidad de Con- huemul sampled in the present study, we
cepción, Chillán, Chile. conclude that this louse species is now
Identification of the chewing lice as established on wild huemul, and detected
Bovicola caprae (Ischnocera: Bovicoliidae) infestations were not the result of contact
was based on size, antennal shape, chae- with domestic goats. Goats have been
totaxy, thorax shape, and genitalia, follow- suggested as a potential source of an
ing Werneck (1936, 1948, 1950). The infestation of B. caprae in captive pudu
sucking lice were identified as Solenopotes (Pudu puda; González-Acuña et al., 2004),
binipilosus (Anoplura: Linognathidae) fol- but we believe that the current infesta-
lowing Ferris (1932). Identification of the tions are a result of introduction via
mites as Psoroptes ovis (Acari: Psoropti- domestic goats and a successful host-
dae) was based on previously published switch (see Paterson and Gray, 1997;
descriptions (Sweatman, 1958; Sanders et Paterson et al., 1999, 2003). Other cervid
al., 2000; Pegler et al., 2005). species are not known to be parasitized by
Five (27%) of the 18 huemul were B. caprae (Price et al., 2003).
infested with ectoparasites. Two (11%) The present report of S. binipilosus from
animals carried adult B. caprae, and two huemul constitutes a new host record. This
(11%) carried S. binipilosus; one present- parasite has been recorded from three
ed both louse species. Four (22%) huemul species of deer in South America, including
were affected by P. ovis, but two of them Mazama gouazoubira, Mazama americana
(Castro and Cicchino, 1998), and pudu Sherbrooke through a National Science
(González-Acuña et al., 2004), and has been and Engineering Research Council of
associated with disease. Because of the low Canada (NSERC) grant given to M.
number of specimens collected during this Festa-Bianchet that covered a large part
study (two females), the significance of this of the research expenses. Conaf Aysén
new host record is unknown, and additional District Office allowed us the access to
studies that include goats and other mam- work in LCNR. Huemul-capturing per-
malian hosts are needed to fully understand mits were issued for P. Corti by the
its host range. Wildlife Subdepartment, Natural Renew-
Psoroptes mites are a major cause of able Resources Division of the Agricultur-
psoroptic mange in domestic and wild al Service of Chile (SAG).
ungulates, causing livestock welfare prob-
lems and economic losses in many areas of LITERATURE CITED
the world (Van den Broek and Huntley, CASTRO, D. C., AND C. A. CICCHINO. 1998. Anoplura.
2003). Several species of the genus In Biodiversidad de artrópodos Argentinos, Una
perspectiva biotaxonómica, J. Morrone and S.
Psoroptes, which are all currently consid-
Coscarón (eds.). Ediciones Sur, La Plata,
ered junior synonyms of P. ovis (Zahler et Argentina, pp. 125–143.
al., 2000 [P. equi]; Wall and Kolbe, 2006 CORTI, P. 2008. Organisation sociale, dynamique de
[P. ovis]), have been described and population, et conservation du cerf huemul
recorded from different species of wild (Hippocamelus bisulcus) dans la Patagonie du
herbivores, such as European bison (Bison Chili. PhD Thesis, Université de Sherbrooke,
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada.
bonasus; Kadulski et al., 1996), Wapiti DÍAZ, N. I., AND J. M. SMITH-FLUECK. 2000. The
(Cervus canadensis; Zahler et al., 2000), Patagonian huemul. A mysterious deer on the
and African buffalo (Syncerus caffer) in brink of extinction. Literatura of Latin America,
Kenya (Sweatman et al., 1969). This is the Buenos Aires, Argentina, 149 pp.
first record of P. ovis in huemul, and as FERRIS, G. F. 1932. Contributions toward a monograph
of the sucking lice. Part V. Stanford University
with B. caprae, the significance of these Publications, Biological Series 2: 271–413.
infestations to huemul conservation is GONZÁLEZ-ACUÑA, D., D. C. DEL CASTRO, L. MORENO,
unclear and deserves additional study. AND E. MEY. 2004. First records of lice (Insecta:
We are greatly indebted to K. Ardiles Phthiraptera) from wild southern pudu, Pudu
for her help in the preparation of the puda (Mammalia: Artiodactyla: Cervidae). Eu-
ropean Journal of Wildlife Research 50: 216–
ectoparasites in the laboratory; J. Avila for 217.
assistance; and R. L. Palma (Museum of HUNTER, M. L. 1996. Fundamentals of conservation
New Zealand Te Papa Tongarewa) for his biology. Blackwell Science. Cambridge, pp. 483.
critical review of the manuscript. We IUCN. 2008. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species,
would like to thank all the people that www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed May 2008.
JOHNSON, K. P., AND D. H. CLAYTON. 2003. The
helped in the capturing of huemul and in
biology, ecology, and evolution of chewing lice.
the fieldwork, D. Velasquez, D. Jara, R. In The chewing lice: World checklist and
Millacura, H. Velasquez, and T. Ormeño. biological overview. Special Publication 24, R.
We are also very thankful to D. Shackleton D. Price, R. A. Hellenthal, R. L. Palma, K. P.
for correcting the English and improving Johnson, and D. H. Clayton (eds.). Illinois
Natural History Survey, Illinois, pp. 449–476.
early drafts and to J. A. and W. Flueck for
KADULSKI, S., J. N. IZDEBSKA, AND M. KONCZYK. 1996.
sharing information. This research would Parasitic arthropods of Bison bonasus from
not have been possible without funding Bialowieza primeval forest. Wiadomości Para-
from the Denver Zoological Foundation, zytologiczne 42: 255–260.
Conservación Patagónica, and Wildlife KRANTZ, G. W. 1978. A manual of Acarology. 2nd
Edition. Oregon State University Book Stores,
Conservation Society (WCS) Field Veter-
Inc., Corvallis, Oregon, 509 pp.
inary Program. During this research, P. LOHELE, C. 1995. Social barriers to pathogen
Corti received economic support from a transmission in wild animal populations. Ecology
PhD scholarship from the Université de 76: 326–335.
PALMA, R. L. 1978. Slide-mounting of lice: A detailed SMITH-FLUECK, J. M. 2000. La situación actual del
description of the Canada balsam technique. huemul patagónico. In El huemul patagónico:
New Zealand Entomologist 6: 432–436. Un misterioso cérvido al borde de la extinction,
PATERSON, A. M., AND R. D. GRAY. 1997. Host- N. Dı́az and J. Smith-Flueck (eds.). L.O.L.A.,
parasite cospeciation, host switching and missing Buenos Aires, Argentina, pp. 67–150.
the boat. In Host-parasite evolution: General SWEATMAN, G. K. 1958. On the life history and validity
principles and avian models, D. H. Clayton and of the species in Psoroptes, a genus of mange
J. Moore (eds.). Oxford University Press, Oxford, mites. Canadian Journal of Zoology 36: 905–929.
England, pp. 326–250. ———, J. B. WALKER, AND J. A. BINDERNAGEL. 1969.
———, R. L. PALMA, AND R. D. GRAY. 1999. How Stages in the development of Choriopsoroptes
frequently do avian lice miss the boat? Implica- kenyensis gen. et sp. n. (Acari: Sarcoptiformes:
tions for coevolutionary studies. Systematic Psoroptidae), a body mange mite from captive
Biology 48: 214–223. African buffalo, Syncerus caffer, in Kenya.
———, ———, AND ———. 2003. Drowning on Journal of Parasitology 55: 1298–1310.
arrival, missing the boat, and x-events: How TAGLE, I. 1966. Parásitos de los animales domésticos
likely are sorting events? In Tangled trees: en Chile. Boletı́n Chileno de Parasitologı́a 21:
Phylogeny, cospeciation, and coevolution, R. D. 118–121.
M. Page (ed.). University of Chicago Press,
VAN DEN BROEK A. H., AND J. F. HUNTLEY. 2003. Sheep
Chicago and London, pp. 287–309.
scab: The disease, pathogenesis and control.
PEGLER, K. R., L. EVANS, J. R. STEVENS, AND R. WALL.
Journal of Comparative Pathology 128: 79–91.
2005. Morphological and molecular comparison
WALL, R., AND K. KOLBE. 2006. Taxonomic priority in
of host-derived populations of parasitic Psorop-
Psoroptes mange mites: P. ovis or P. equi?
tes mites. Medical and Veterinary Entomology
Experimental and Applied Acarology 39: 159–162.
19: 392–403.
WERNECK, F. L. 1936. Contribuão ao conhecimento
POVILITIS, A. 1998. Characteristics and conservation
of a fragmented population of huemul Hippoca- dos mallophagos encontrados nos mamiferos sul-
melus bisulcus in central Chile. Biological americanos. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo
Conservation 86: 97–104. Cruz 31: 391–589.
PRICE, R. D., R. A. HELLENTHAL, AND R. L. PALMA. ———. 1948. Os malófagos de mamı́feros. Parte I:
2003. World checklist of chewing lice with host Amblycera e Ischnocera (Philopteridae e parte
associations and keys to families and genera. In de Trichodectidae). Revista Brasileira de Biolo-
The chewing lice: World checklist and biological gia, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 243 pp.
overview, Special Publication 24, R. D. Price, R. ———. 1950. Os malófagos de mamı́feros. Parte II:
A. Hellenthal, R. L. Palma, K. P. Johnson, and Ischnocera (continuaão de Trichodectidae) e
D. H. Clayton (eds.). Illinois Natural History Rhyncophthirina. Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, Rio
Survey, Illinois, pp. 1–448. de Janeiro, Brazil, 207 pp.
SANDERS, A., P. FROGGATT, R. WALL, AND K. E. SMITH. ZAHLER, M., W. M. L. HENDRIKX, A. ESSIG, H.
2000. Life-cycle stage morphology of Psoroptes RINDER, AND R. GOTHE. 2000. Species of the
mange mites. Medical and Veterinary Entomol- genus Psoroptes (Acari: Psoroptidae): A taxo-
ogy 14: 131–141. nomic consideration. Experimental and Applied
SERRET, A. 2001. El huemul, fantasma de la Acarology 24 3: 213–225.
Patagonia. Zagier and Urruty Ed., Ushuaia,
Argentina, 130 pp. Received for publication 22 May 2008.