Crime Analysis Data Crime Mapping
Crime Analysis Data Crime Mapping
This paper briefly explains a short summary of chapter 5 of Rachel Boba Santos’
textbook, Crime Analysis with Crime Mapping, 3rd Ed. It will examine briefly crime analysis
data collection and the collation of such data. It also covers such topics as data matrix, databases
used in crime analysis, geographic data, records management systems, primary data collection,
KEYWORDS: Crime Analysis Data Collection, Collation of Data, Data Matrix, Databases
Geographic Data, Records Management Systems, Primary Data Collection, Crime Data
Part 1
Summary
available at the fingertips of a computer, those in power have the needed knowledge to analyze all
depend upon information to provide feedback that increases profits, and police turn to collected
information to watch criminals in criminal activity, to stop crime, and to foretell future crime
before it happens.
Crime analyist date back to the London Metropolitan Police in the Eighteenth Century,
around 1840 providing the police force with crime statistics in the year 1847. The work of the
London Metropolitan Police analyst led to the concept of a criminal’s modus operandi when the
term appeared in the mid nineteenth century (Bruce, Gwinn, Cooper, & Hick, 2008).
Our textbook, chapter 5 to be specific, looks at, and defines definitions of key concepts
A Data Matrix is built with the collection of data (organized information) which is sorted
into tabular categories to help identify the information and sort it for easier retrieval at a later date
within a computer database. Databases contain infinite amounts of information that can be
reviewed within a complex relationship amongst numerous tables known as relational databases.
Some of the information stored would be geographic data used in geographic information
systems also known as GIS. Then there is tabular data that one finds within a database. This is
such information as crime reports and vehicular accidents. Primary data is collected primarily for
analyst who obtain this information firsthand through such means as interviews, surveys, field
research and direct observation. Secondary data is information that is normally information
collected in an ongoing basis and used by government, law enforcement agencies to assist analyst
in their review of the information collected. There are two types of secondary data; qualitative
There are approximately eleven specific databases used by crime analyst in their work.
These eleven include: data related to actual crime incidents. An arrest database used by crime
analyst contains numerous variables stored within an arrest database; such as: number of arrests,
date and time, charges, geographic information as to where the crime was committed, the address
where the criminal resides, a person’s date of birth, and that person’s physical attributes. Another
database used by analyst would be the call for service database which contains information
including the number of incidents called in, the dates and time of calls, the type of calls, and the
location of a request for service. Accident databases store information relating to traffic accidents,
containing such useful details as an accident report number, the date of the report, the date and
time of the occurrence, the location and violations associated with the traffic accident (Boba
Santos, R. (2013).
The above noted are only a few of the databases used by crime analyst. Some other
categories would include a “persons database, a vehicle database, a field information database, a
traffic database, known offender database and registered sex offender database. The collection of
such data has not been regulated by the Federal government however, there has been, in more
recent times, an effort to develop a nationally based classification system to help keep “consistent
count” of crimes and criminal activity. The Uniform Crime Report having its beginnings in the
1930’s, thus, the federal government, in an effort to improve the collection of criminal data has
created a reporting system knowns as the National Incident Based Reporting System or (NIBRS)
Part 2
with outdated computer tracking systems for court costs and court fines. Up until now, we have
been using paper trail accounting of such information. When an individual is ordered by the
court to pay a court fine that individual would come to the clerk’s office, pay the fine by check or
cash, be given a handwritten receipt and be on their way. The clerk’s office would then post the
money received in a handwritten accounting journal. Fines could not be paid for online, but had
to be paid in person. Court costs could not be paid by debit or credit cards or electronic transfer
and had to be paid in person or by mail. Often times mailed payments were received after the
pay-by-due-date because of delivery issues with the U.S. Postal Service, with holidays and tax
season causing exceptionally late arrivals of mailed in payments. Cash receipt of such money
has been difficult to accurately track and employee theft has been difficult to prove without the
proper safeguards for cross matching of payments with accounting practices. A great deal of
court costs and court fines are uncollected because of human error, poor record keeping
practices, and a parties failure to appear in person to pay their fines, by those charged with such
fees. This has left me, the court administrator with the need to get a computerized database
records system into the court where information can be collected, maintained and accurately
installation of this type. I must go to my state’s legislative body and request 2.1 million dollars
to install the computers and databases and pay for training to get this project off the ground. My
state is in economic woes at this time and the likely hood of my receiving such funds is dismal.
Thus I perform an audit of the funds that have been collected within the past ten years, the funds
still on the books uncollected, and the cost to the court to track down many of these people who
are often times transients. With this information, I then prepare a proposal that includes the
current lost revenues and compare to the income generation such a computerized database would
provide. Income can be generated with an updated system not only in the collections of such
fines and court costs, but this database will also allow the court to go online with electronic filing
computerized system would not only provide a source of ongoing revenue to the court budget,
but that the earning potential will pay for the entire database system within 4 years. With this
granted the funding for the next fiscal year to proceed with this project.
In anticipation of the roll out of such a system, I begin working with groups of
individuals in the courthouse to begin organizing the data that will need to be stored. There will
be a need to identify the person’s information, name, current address, last known address, date of
birth, attorney’s name and contact information, charges pending, charges dismissed, judge’s
rulings in a matter, criminal docket number, prosecutor in charge of the matter, their contact
information, fines ordered, fines paid, court costs charged, court costs paid, outstanding debts
owed to the court from previous matters, interests and fees for unpaid fines, police department
associated with this matter. In regards to being able to provide attorney’s with online
documents through an e-filing system, the court documents will need to be scanned and
converted to pdf format which will require a database of information for easy search and
retrieval of said pdf files. That information will also require various data fields such as case
number, parties to the legal matter, attorneys representing the parties, contact information for all
parties to a matter, dates of various court pleadings, trials, hearings, motions, and orders.
With so much data to be collected and organized, I begin working with teams to organize
this information into batches that can be input into my database system as soon as we are
prepared to roll this new system out. It’s going to be challenging to get court employees trained
and willing to work with a computerized system because many of my employees are state
unionized workers who have been within the court system for 20 plus years. Many are old
schooled and have little computer training. Many don’t see a need for this technology because
they believe that since we’ve been doing it this way for so many years, they have an attitude that
we should upset the applecart. It’s imperative to bring the courthouse into a stable financial
environment that is less dependent upon state funds to operate while working diligently to
generate income for the state court system during these hard economic times. I am determined to
help my employees see the benefit of this technological advance and with committees of those I
know are dedicated to their job security and some of my most talented employees, I begin
Several years later, the system is in place, but not without undergoing many obstacles and
challenges, however, as my initial analysis outlined, the costs of implementing such a system
was recouped within a short period of time and the state court system is generating much larger
than anticipated and much needed revenues. We are able to track people who move frequently
because we have coupled our system with that of the Department of Motor Vehicles, thus giving
us updated information about residency, therefore, “Unable to Deliver” responses from the U.S.
Politically speaking, my efforts to undertake this project and see it through to completion
has secured my position as State Court Administrator for years to come. I hope!
References
Boba Santos, R. (2013) Crime Analysis with Crime Mapping. (3rd ed., pp. 5, 23, 67, 115). Los
Angelos, London, New Delhi, Singapore, Washington, D.C.: Sage. ISBN 978-1-4522-
0271-6
Bruce, C., Gwinn, S., Cooper, J., & Hick, S. (2008). Exploring Crime Analysis. Smart Policing
http://www.smartpolicinginitiative.com/sites/.../files/iaca_fundamentals.pdf