Faustine

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORT
DEPARTMENT OF LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORT STUDIES
PROGRAM : HIGHER DIPLOMA IN SHIPPING AND PORTS

LOGISTICS MANAGEMENT
MODULE CODE : SPU 07422
MODULE NAME : SHIPPING AND PORT FINANCE
SEMESTER. : TWO
LECTURER’S NAME : MATHEW SWILA
ACADEMIC YEAR : 2023/2024
TASK : INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT 1
STREAM :A
NAME FAUSTINE J. NGOTTY

REG NO NIT/BSPLM/2022/1347
QUESTION
1. Explain project evalution
2. Describe principles of project evaluation
3. Explain project success and failure
1. Project evaluation is the process of assessing a project's performance, outputs,
outcomes, and impacts against predetermined goals and objectives. It involves
gathering and analyzing information to determine whether a project has been
successful in achieving its intended results and whether it has been effective, efficient,
and sustainable.
Here are some key aspects of project evaluation:
Purpose: The purpose of project evaluation is to provide feedback on a project's progress and
performance, identify strengths and weaknesses, and make recommendations for future
improvements.
Criteria: Evaluation criteria typically include aspects such as relevance, effectiveness,

efficiency, impact, and sustainability. These criteria are used to assess how well the project has
achieved its goals and objectives.
Methods: There are various methods and tools that can be used for project evaluation, such as
surveys, interviews, focus groups, observations, document analysis, and performance metrics.
The choice of methods depends on the nature of the project, the available resources, and the
evaluation questions being addressed.
Stakeholders: It is important to involve relevant stakeholders in the evaluation process,

including project staff, beneficiaries, funders, and other partners. Their perspectives and
feedback can provide valuable insights into the project's performance and outcomes.
Timing: Project evaluation can be conducted at different stages of the project lifecycle,
including during the planning phase, implementation phase, and after the project has been
completed. Evaluating a project at different points can help in tracking progress, making timely
adjustments, and learning from the experience.
Reportin: A project evaluation report is typically prepared to document the findings,

conclusions, and recommendations of the evaluation. The report should be clear, objective, and
based on evidence, and it should be shared with stakeholders to inform decision-making and
improve future projects.
Overall, project evaluation is a critical process that helps organizations assess the effectiveness
of their projects, learn from their experiences, and make informed decisions for future initiatives.
By conducting thorough and systematic evaluations, organizations can improve their project
management practices, demonstrate accountability to stakeholders, and maximize the impact of
their work.
2. Project evaluations are guided by several key principles that help ensure the evaluation
process is rigorous, credible, and useful for informing decision-making. Here are some of the
principles of project evaluations:
Purpose-driven: Every project evaluation should have a clear and well-defined purpose. The
evaluation objectives should be established at the outset and should guide the design of the
evaluation, including the selection of evaluation questions, methods, and indicators.
Stakeholder involvement: Stakeholders should be actively engaged throughout the evaluation

process. This includes involving stakeholders in the design of the evaluation, collecting their
input and feedback, and sharing evaluation findings with them. Engaging stakeholders helps
ensure that the evaluation is relevant, credible, and useful.
Independence and impartiality: Evaluations should be conducted by individuals or teams that

are independent from the project being evaluated. This helps ensure objectivity and impartiality
in the evaluation process and findings. Evaluators should strive to present findings and
conclusions based on evidence and data, rather than biases or preconceived notions.
Transparency: Project evaluations should be transparent in their processes, methods, and

findings. Transparency helps build trust in the evaluation results and ensures that stakeholders
understand how the evaluation was conducted and what the findings mean. Transparency also
includes sharing both positive and negative findings openly.
Usefulness: Evaluations should be designed to be useful and relevant to decision-makers.

Evaluation findings should be presented in a clear and actionable manner, with practical
recommendations for improving project performance and outcomes. The ultimate goal of project
evaluations is to enhance learning and inform decision-making for future projects.
Ethical considerations: Project evaluations should adhere to ethical standards and guidelines.
This includes ensuring the confidentiality of sensitive information, obtaining informed consent
from participants, and protecting the rights and well-being of all individuals involved in the
evaluation.
Quality and credibility: Project evaluations should be conducted with high-quality standards in
mind. This includes using appropriate methods and tools, ensuring data accuracy and reliability,
and conducting the evaluation in a systematic and rigorous manner. Credible evaluations are
more likely to be trusted and acted upon by stakeholders.
By adhering to these principles, project evaluations can provide valuable insights into project
performance, outcomes, and impacts, helping organizations improve their practices and achieve
better results in their future projects.
3. Project success and failure can be defined and perceived in various ways, depending on the
stakeholders involved and the specific goals and objectives of the project. Here are some
common factors that contribute to project success and failure:
Project Success Factors:
Achieving Objectives: The project delivers the expected outcomes and meets its predefined
goals within the allocated time frame and budget.
Stakeholder Satisfaction: Stakeholders, including clients, team members, and end-users, are
satisfied with the project results and the process of project delivery
Adherence to Scope: The project stays within the defined scope and does not deviate
significantly from the original plan, avoiding scope creep.
Quality Deliverables: The project produces high-quality deliverables that meet or exceed the
specified standards and requirements.
On Time and On Budget: The project is completed within the scheduled timeframe and budget
constraints without significant overruns.
Effective Communication: Clear and efficient communication among team members,

stakeholders, and project managers contributes to project success by ensuring everyone is on the
same page.
Risk Management: Effective identification, assessment, and mitigation of risks help prevent
major setbacks and ensure project success.
Project Failure Factors:
Incomplete Requirements: Unclear or constantly changing requirements can lead to scope

creep, delays, and ultimately project failure.
Poor Planning: Inadequate project planning, including inaccurate estimates, unrealistic

schedules, and insufficient resource allocation, can lead to project failure.
Lack of Stakeholder Engagemen: Failure to involve key stakeholders in decision-making

processes and not addressing their needs and expectations can result in project failure.
Inadequate Resources: Insufficient resources, including budget, time, and skilled personnel, can
hinder project progress and lead to failure.
Ineffective Communication: Poor communication within the project team and with
stakeholders can lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, and delays that may ultimately cause
project failure.
Unforeseen Risks: Failure to identify and address risks in a timely manner can result in
unexpected issues that disrupt project progress and lead to failure.
Lack of Monitoring and Control: Inadequate monitoring of project progress and failure to take
corrective actions when needed can result in the project going off track and ultimately failing to
meet its objectives.
Understanding these success and failure factors can help project managers and stakeholders
identify potential risks and challenges early on, implement strategies to mitigate them, and
increase the likelihood of project success. Regular monitoring, evaluation, and adaptation
throughout the project lifecycle are essential to address issues proactively and ensure project
success.
References
Weiss, C.H. (1998). Evaluation, Methods for Studying Programs and Policies (2nd ed.).
London: Prentice-hall

Faustine

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Faustine

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Description:

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Faustine

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TRANSPORT

DEPARTMENT OF LOGISTICS AND TRANSPORT STUDIES

PROGRAM : HIGHER DIPLOMA IN SHIPPING AND PORTS

NAME FAUSTINE J. NGOTTY

Here are some key aspects of project evaluation:

Criteria: Evaluation criteria typically include aspects such as relevance, effectiveness,

Stakeholders: It is important to involve relevant stakeholders in the evaluation process,

Reportin: A project evaluation report is typically prepared to document the findings,

Stakeholder involvement: Stakeholders should be actively engaged throughout the evaluation

Independence and impartiality: Evaluations should be conducted by individuals or teams that

Transparency: Project evaluations should be transparent in their processes, methods, and

Usefulness: Evaluations should be designed to be useful and relevant to decision-makers.

Project Success Factors:

Effective Communication: Clear and efficient communication among team members,

Project Failure Factors:

Incomplete Requirements: Unclear or constantly changing requirements can lead to scope

Poor Planning: Inadequate project planning, including inaccurate estimates, unrealistic

Lack of Stakeholder Engagemen: Failure to involve key stakeholders in decision-making

You might also like