INDEX

Declaration 2

Acknowledgment 3

Introduction 4

Table Of Cases 5

Report 6
Week 1 6
Week 2 9
Week 3 12
Week 4 15

Conclusion 18

ANNEXURE I: True Copy Of Internship Certificate 19

 Declaration

This declaration is made at Delhi that this internship report contains the work accomplished by me
which was assigned to me during internship. This work was done in respect of the partial fulfilment
of the requirement for the award of degree of B.A.LLB. This has not been submitted either in
whole or in part to any other Law University or affiliated Institute under University, recognized
by the Bar Council of India for the award of any law degree or diploma within the territories of
India. All information provided here, have been comprehended from actual legal documents and
do not contain any alteration as far as the facts and judicial orders are concerned.

That the certificate attached herein is the true copy of the certificate that I received in lieu of the
work undertaken by me during the course of my internship.
Vanshika Joon
09714703820
B.A.LLB
5B
Date : 30 December,
2022
Place : New Delhi
 Acknowledgment

It gives me immense pleasure to thank my supervisor, Adv Parvinder Chauhan, who guided me
and assisted on every moment for completion of this project. I take this opportunity to thank my
parents, friends and all the people who with their inspiring support helped me to finish my work
with excellence.

Also last but not least, I would like to bow my sincere gratitude to the Director, Institute of Law,
Maharaja Agrasen Institute of Management Studies, New Delhi who provided me the opportunity
to work and as a result of which I gained expertise and experience.
 Introduction

During the summer break of my 4th semester, I was required to do a one month compulsory
internship as suggested by my college. I opted for an at office internship with Advocate Parvinder
Chauhan. The duration of my internship was 1 month from 01/08/22 - 31/08/2022. During the
internship, I got a great at hand experience of the working of the court system in India. I witnessed
many proceedings in real time and learnt so much about the practicality of what has been taught
in theory in college. I got to work with Adv Parvinder Chauhan and several other learned
advocates, who were my constant sources of gaining experience and vast knowledge of the laws
and court proceedings. I visited several district courts in Delhi such as the Tis Hazari Court, Saket
Court, Karkardooma Court, Rohini Court. I got a chance to visit the Honourable Delhi High Court
as well. In the following report, I will be highlighting my work during the course of the internship
by the way of court proceedings that I attended and observed. To come up with a coherent and
chronological Internship Report that can accurately convey the extent and depth of what I have
learnt over the period of one month, I have decided to split the report into a weekly format. I begin
with a week by week recap of my work done. I have included all details that I believe are relevant
to the internship and sincerely hope that I have not left out any part of the internship experience
that may detract from the purpose of this summer training report.

This internship for me was not simply a work experience but a significant educational experience
as well. It helped me to acquaint myself better concerning the field of law.
 Table Of Cases

S.N NAME OF THE COURT NAME OF THE CASE PAGE

O NO.

1. Tis Hazari Court State V. Mohd. Maqbool 7-8

2. Tis Hazari Court Deepak Rikhari V. 9-12

Bharti Axa Life
Insurance
Company Ltd.
3. Saket Court Arjun Bhardwaj V. Savi 13-14

4. Rohini Court State V. Hari Kishan 15-16

5. Karkardooma Court Apex Traders V. M/S. 17-18

Satnam Sales Corporation
Etc.

6. Tis Hazari Court State V. Iqbal Singh 19-20

7. Tis Hazari Court Ashish Jain V. 21-22

Radius Synergy

8. Saket Court Bhupinder Singh V. 23-25

Sandipan Infrastructure
 Report

Week 1

IN THE COURT OF SH. SATISH KUMAR ARORA, CMM, TIS HAZARI COURT, DELHI

State … Prosecutor
Versus
Mohd. Maqbool … Accused

District: Central Police Station: DBG Road Year: 2012

FIR NO. 270/12. Dated 10/12/12

Cr. Case No. 7522/2017

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

Name of the accused - Mohd. Maqbool Religion- Muslim

On 10/12/12, Duty officer PS DBG Road, Delhi visited a factory where a raid had been conducted
to rescue the child labour through NGO Salam Balak Trust. The address of the factory- A 10, SP
Mukherji Market, molding machine factory, where they found a child working on the machine.
Upon questioning his age, he told the inspector that he is 16 years old and that his master’s name
is Rahish and he does not know the address of his house. The minor also addressed his superiors
to the team. With the help of the rescue team, the superior was questioned and upon questioning,
the superior told his name to be Bhoola Kumar.
 OBSERVATION
We filed an exemption application on behalf of accused Mohd. Maqbool as he had gone to Bihar
for the celebration of Eid. He had to return to Delhi to attend the court hearing on 12/07/2022 but
unfortunately he met with an accident while
he was in Bihar. According to the medical report given to him by the doctor, he had to be on
complete bed rest as a result of which he could not come back to Delhi even though he had booked
his return ticket dated 11/07/2022, proof of which has been provided in the exemption application
along with the medical report copy.

Acts & Sections used : 374/506 IPC

: 23/26 JJ (Care & Protection of children) Act, 2000
: 3/14 Child Labour (Prohibition & Regulations) Act, 1986
: 16/17/18/19 Bonded Labour System Abolition Act, 1976.
BEFORE THE DISTRICT CONSUMER DISPUTES REDRESSAL. COMMISSION,
DISTRICT CENTRAL, DELHI ...

Deepak Rikhari And Anr. … Complainants

Versus
Bharati AXA Life Insurance Company Ltd … Accused

COMPLAINT UNDER SECTION-35 OF CONSUMER PROTECTION ACT,2019

AGAINST BHARTI AXA LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. FOR DEFICIENCY IN
SERVICE AND UNFAIR TRADE PRACTICES ADOPTED BY THE OPPOSITE PARTY

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

1. The complainants availed one Home Loan vide Loan Ref./ID No. HOUGRP0419679390
for Flat No. 119-B, Pocket-B, LIG Flats,G.T.B. Enclave, Delhi- 110093 from PNB
Housing Finance Limited in the month of May, 2019 and at the time of availing the said
Home Loan, the opposite party introduced one Home Loan Protection Plan and apprised
the complainants that the Home Loan secure policy offered by the opposite party is a
transferable policy and therefore the same shall be transferred, if the complainants
transfer the balance of Home Loan to any other bank.
2. It was further assured by the opposite party to the complainants that it in case the
complainants don't wish to continue with the policy, in that case, the
proportionate amount will be returned to the complainants.
3. It was further apprised by the opposite party that they are providing the Home Loan
Security as per the requirement of its customer, meaning thereby that the
complainants can avail the security of Home Loan for any period as per their
requirement and wish.
4. When the complainants sought the salient features of the policy in written then the
executive of the opposite party sent one email dated 30.04.2019 to the complainants and
 apprised about the salient features of the policy. The salient features apprised by
opposite party's executive is as follows:

PLEASE FIND THE MENTION BELOW

PRODUCT FEATURE OF LOAN SECURE
PRODUCT:-
DEATH IS A BITTER TRUTH OF LIFE - A property can be reconstructed again if survived but
what if in case of Death of Main Borrower????????????
1) Who will pay the future EMI's
2) What will happen to the property
3) Who will bear the ongoing expenses
Many more like this.
And the Answer is Loan Secure
Death Benefits- Outstanding loan amount (as per amortization schedule of COI) paid off in case
of unfortunate death of borrower.
(a) Additional reducing accidental death benefit for first five years up to the opted sum assured
or 50 lacs whichever is lower will be paid to the nominee.
(b) Joint Borrower coverage in case of common liability-Discount for joint cover
(c) Cover continuance option - Continue the insurance cover even if loan is repaid.
(d) All types of death covered even suicide is covered after I year.
(e) It provides long term loan cover (Entire loan tenure can be covered) and the coverage is
linked to your loan.
5. Accordingly impressed with the features and assurances provided by the opposite party
through its executive, on 30.05.2019, the complainants purchased one of Home Loan
Secure policy of opposite party by paying a Total Single Premium of Rs. 1,15,155.75/-
(ONE LAKH FIFTEEN THOUSAND ONE HUNDRED FIFTY FIVE RUPEES AND
SEVENTY FIVE PAISE Only) for the protection of initial 10 years of Home Loan,
vide policy no.10000067, certificate of insurance no.
PNBHFL_HOUGRP0419679390_PHF15.
 6. That in the month of July, 2020, the complainants transferred the balance loan from
PNB Housing Finance Limited to HDFC Ltd and after transferring the balance loan the
complainants approached the executive of opposite party namely Pankaj Kumar, who
sold the policy to the complainant and requested him to refund the amount as till date he
failed to provide the modified terms & conditions. The complainants further apprised the
executive that the complainants have now transferred the balance loan amount to HDFC
Ltd and after getting the refund the complainant will buy the home loan protection from
the HDFC Ltd.
7. However, after couple of days, the executive of the opposite party showed his inability
to transfer the policy to another company stating as there are two (2) applicant (i.e.,
Geeta Nainwal and Deepak Rikhari) and the transfer is allowed only in cases where only
one
applicant is in the policy.
8. Getting the inability of the opposite party to transfer the Home Loan Secure policy from
PB Housing Finance Limited to HDFC Ltd, the complainants requested the opposite
party to refund the premium of the policy, but despite courteous and genuine requests by
the complainants, the executive of the opposite party informed the complainants to refund
of a meagre and negligible amount of Rs.33,000/-which was nothing but utter harassment
and financial distress caused by the opposite parties to the complainants.

Sections Applied - Section 35 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019 against Bharti Axa Life
Insurance Company Ltd. for deficiency in service and unfair trade practices adopted by the
opposite party.

OBSERVATION

On 14 July, 2022. (Stage 1 of this case)

1. The judge said that the email sent expressing his grievances was not registered
office records of Bharti Axa.
2. The judge further noted that the WhatsApp conversation cannot be taken as evidence in
this case because the party would have wrongly shown a conversation with a false contact
number.
3. Judge did not consider the email because they said you are sending the email which
becomes the part of a notice to increase the cause of action. But our side said that the
other side did not respond about what specifications they wanted so it is not increasing
the cause of action, but merely an initial notice sent to the other party.
 Week 2

IN THE COURT OF SH. NARESH KUMAR LAKA, ADJ, SOUTH-EAST, SAKET

COURTS, NEW DELHI

SUIT NO. 508/2019

SH. ARJUN BHARDWAJ … Plaintiff

Versus
MS. SAVI … Defendant

SUBJECT: SUIT FOR SPECIFIC PERFORMANCE. POSSESSION AND INJUNCTION

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

(Representing the plaintiff in the present case):
1. That the defendant is the absolute owner and in physical possession of the property no.
113-B, Basement, Front Portion, Dayanand Colony, Lajpat Nagar-IV, New Delhi-110024
which has been rented to the plaintiff on a sum of Rs. 3,000/- (Rupees three thousand) per
month
according to a rent agreement dated 11.05.2019 valid for
11 months.
2. It was agreed between the parties that the defendant will hand-over the plaintiff the vacant
possession of the property by/on 14.05.2019 after minor repair works but till date the vacant
possession has not been handed over by the defendant to the plaintiff.
3. That when the plaintiff approached the defendant for the vacant possession the defendant
threatened the plaintiff that she will induct another tenant in the suit property which showed
the mala-fide intentions of the defendant to which the plaintiff got to know from the local
neighborhood that the defendant is planning to rent out or sell the alleged property to run from
the jurisdiction of this court.

OBSERVATION
1. That the matter was on the stage of miscellaneous argument.
2. That one Inderjeet Singh Sodhi filed an interim application as to alleging that the defendant is
trying to create a third party interest in the alleged property which doesn't belong to her and that
she is trying to mislead the court and the plaintiff.
3. That accordingly the counsel for the plaintiff consulted his client and settled the matter in the
court and withdrew the said suit.
 IN THE COURT OF SH. ASHISH AGGARWAL, CMM, ROHINI COURTS, DELHI

State … Prosecutor
Versus
Hari Kishan … Accused

Police Station: Alipur

F.I.R. NO.:
331/14 U/S:
354/323/341/509 IPC

SUBJECT: FIR for outraging the modesty of a women, wrongfully restraining and
voluntarily causing hurt

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

(Representing the Accused)

1. According to the victim's story the accused Hari Kishan was following her from months with
malafide actions to which the accused told her not too. Further the victim's husband also warned
the accused to stop following his wife or to roam around their house by acting like he's talking to
someone on phone.
2. On the alleged day, it is alleged that the accused got hold the victim's hand when she was going
to the farm to cut wheat crop with her sister and abused and beat her to which when her sister
interfered to stop him, the accused again abused them and ran away from the spot.
3. The victim dialed the police station on 100 number and went home to which the police arrived
at her home and got recorded her statement to which a charge of Section-354/323/341/509 IPC
was made on the accused by the victim.

OBSERVATION :1. That the matter was at the stage of prosecution evidence.
2. The last prosecution witness was being summoned i.e. the doctor who checked-up on the victim
on the alleged day to which his testimony was taken on record and he was cross examined
accordingly on the same day and was discharged.
3. That the defense chose not to bring up any witness in their defence as the main witnesses have
turned hostile.
4. The judge is of the view that he will be hearing arguments instead of whatever the witnesses
have told.
 Week 3

IN THE COURT OF LD. MM. SHAHDARA DISTRICT, KARKARDOOMA COURT,

DELHI

Apex Traders … Complainant

Versus
M/S. Satnam Sales Corporation Etc …

Accused Police Station: Seemapur

F.I.R.
NO. U/S. 406,
420 IPC

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

Satnam sales corporation is a Nagpur based raw material supplier. Both parties entered in a contract
in the year 2006 with the Apex traders who are doing their business in Delhi. The complainant
paid amount Rs. 52 Lacs via Cheque for the raw materials they need in their business. After
receiving the cheque, the accused have not supplied the raw material to the complainant. In the
year 2008 the complainant filed a criminal case against them. The accused told the court that there
is no criminal jurisdiction in this and have requested the court to dismiss this case and the
complainant can file a civil recovery suit if they want but there is no criminal jurisdiction in this.
The court agreed to this and dismissed the case. The complainant then approached the Hon’ble
High Court of Delhi in appeal to this and the High Court of Delhi agreed that there is also a criminal
liability and criminal case can also be filed and passed the order in favor of the complainant. By
this time the accused had stopped appearing before the Hon’ble
court and after seeing all the evidence has declared the accused as PO. While simultaneously a
recovery suit has also been filed by the complainant and in that case the decree has been passed in
favor of the complainant and execution of that decree is pending in the Nagpur district court as the
JD is from Nagpur.

OBSERVATION
The accused person has already been declared PO vide order dated 07/02/2020.
The Ld. counsel on behalf of the complainant moved an application on furnishing a fresh address
of the accused. Amended memo of parties has also been filed by the complainant.
N.D.O.H: Put up for the appearance of accused on 03/01/2023.
 IN THE COURT OF MS. SONAM GUPTA, CMM, WEST, TIS HAZARI COURTS,
DELHI

State … Prosecutor
Versus
Iqbal Singh. … Accused

Police Station: Tilak Nagar

FIR NO. 191/2010 U/S
: 498A IPC
SUBJECT: FIR FOR
CRUELTY

BRIEF FACTS OF THE

CASE

(For the accused in present case)

1. That the accused was married to Baljeet Kaur and is working as a school van driver.
2. It is being alleged by the wife of the accused that soon after marriage the relationship between
them got cold.
3. It is alleged that the accused gave beatings and abused his wife and asked for more dowry
during the course of marriage.
4. That a son has been born out of this wedlock and a custody matter is being run in the other
court.
5. That the son is with the mother i.e. Baljeet Kaur.
 OBSERVATION

1. On the previous date of hearing, the parties got into a fight outside the court premises and the
matter was up for petitioner's evidence.
2. The accused filed an application for police protection as he feared attacks on him by his wife
and his brother-in-law.
3. The wife on the other hand filed an application that the accused is doing obscene
acts and gestures in front of her.
4. The prosecution evidence was deferred on account of want of some original documents which
wasn't present with the wife of the accused.
 Week 4

IN THE COURT OF SH. RAJNISH KUMAR GUPTA, LD. DISTRICT

JUDGE- 02(COMMERCIAL COURTS), CENTRAL, TIS HAZARI COURTS,
DELHI

SUIT NO. CS(COMMERCIAL) NO. 2276/17

(SUIT FOR RECOVERY UNDER ORDER XXXVII OF CPC)

Ashish Jain … Plaintiff

Versus
Radius Synergy … Defendant

SUBJECT: SUIT FOR RECCOVERY UNDER ORDER XXXVII OF CPC

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

(For the defendant in the present case)
1. That the defendant had ordered the electrical goods worth Rs. 22,30,443/- in total and had not
paid the amount.
2. The transaction was based on trust and repeated request and assurance of the defendant no.1.
3. The rate of interest is 28% p.a. which makes the recovery figure to Rs. 36,87,666/-.
THE DEFENDANT TOOK OBJECTION OF:
4. The suit is barred under limitation act, i.e. the suit is not filed within 3 years from the date of
accrual of cause of action since purchase orders are from 27/10/2010 to 03/02/2013 and the
delivery to be made was within 45 days.
5. That there are no purchase orders after 03/02/2014 but bills are raised as late as 12.03.2015,
without any purchase order.
6. Photocopies of account statement are being attached which are neither confirmed nor endorsed
by the defendant , which means it looses evidentiary value.
7. Defendants are neither residing nor carrying business within the territorial limits of the court.
8. Misjoinder of parties as defendant no.2 , H.S. Singh , director , already resigned.
9. No mechanism has been spelt out as to how the amount is reached.

OBSERVATION:
1. In the previous dates, the plaintiff asked the court to treat this as an ordinary suit.
2. The matter was up for framing of issues and the opposite party i.e. plaintiff submitted that
he has to file a replication to the written statement.
3. The plaintiff didn’t file any replication and filed some proposed issues in front of the court.
4. The following issues were framed:
- Whether the court has the territorial jurisdiction of the present suit? OPP - Whether
the defendant no.1 is the competent party to the suit? OPP
- Whether the plaintiff is entitled for the said amount and from whom?
- Whether there is cause of action in the present suit?
 IN THE COURT OF MS. VANDANA JAIN, ADJ-07, DISTRICT SOUTH- EAST, SAKET
COURTS, NEW DELHI

C.S. NO. /2013

Bhupinder Singh … Plaintiff

Versus
Sandipan Infrastructure … Defendant

SUBJECT: SUIT FOR RECCOVERY

BRIEF FACTS OF THE CASE

(For defendants in the present suit)

1. Sandipan Infrastructure was a company whose head office was on a rented place.
2. Bhupinder Singh was the owner of the rented place.
3. The rent was fixed at Rs. 20,000/- p.m. excluding other charges.
4. The rented area suffered from water logging which wasn't tod by
Bhupinder Singh to the directors of Sandipan Infrastructure.
5. The directors of Sandipan Infrastructure spent a huge amount of Rs.12,00,000/- on redesigning
the rented area in order to use it for their office.
6. The fact that the area is suffering from defective pipelines was not disclosed by the owner
of the rented area.
7. The directors of Sandipan Infrastructure went to Mumbai for 2 months for their business work
and the rented area in Delhi was unused to which all the pipelines jammed and the office
flooded.
8. The flooded office gave out a foul smell to which the neighbors doubted it to be a dead body
at that place. The police were called.
9. The police came and opened the door with the help of a key which was with the owner to
which all the water moved out and it was seen that there was no
dead body but the foul smell was created due to water logging.
10. The directors of Sandipan Infrastructure were called and when they arrived the owner asked
them for the rent.
11. A counter claim of Rs. 12,00,000/- by the directors of Sandipan Infrastructure was filed
for their losses.
12. It is alleged that there was no usage of the rented premises for 2 months and all the furniture
was damaged. There was no usage of the premises during the course of the litigation process.
13. The directors of Sandipan Infrastructure were ready to submit the keys of the premises to the
owner many times to which he refused.

OBSERVATION

1. Today also The directors of Sandipan Infrastructure were ready to submit the keys of
the premises to the owner.
2. The judge interfered in the matter and asked to settle the matter here only.
The matter was settled in the court for Rs. 1,90,000/- to given by the The directors of Sandipan
Infrastructure to the owner of the rented premises and withdraw the counterclaim.
3. Post Dated cheques were given in lieu of settlement amount of Rs. 1,90,000/-and one key of
the rented premises which were there with the directors have been submitted in the court.
 Conclusion

To conclude the report, I would say that this internship was an enlightening learning experience. I
was grateful to have interned with Adv. Parvinder Chauhan who spared his valuable time every
day to teach and guide me towards a more fruitful utilization of my time in Law School. Each day
I learnt something new which not only added to my existing knowledge but also helped me in the
development of my personality.

I was introduced to some highly learned people through this internship. I got to build good
contacts. The period of this internship has been thoroughly knowledgeable and also a joyful
experience. Now I’m very excited about my next learning experience. I hope that I get more and
more such opportunities in later times.
ANNEXURE I: True Copy Of Internship Certificate