Work Breakdown Structure Simplifying Pro
Work Breakdown Structure Simplifying Pro
Work Breakdown Structure Simplifying Pro
4.2 Responsibility
2. Purpose
Project Managers are responsible for the creation of a
The Work Breakdown Structure separates the complete WBS for their assigned projects, with input from other
project into its component elements in order to track the members of the project team.
cost, time and technical performance at all levels of the
project life cycle. 4.3 Creating the Work Breakdown Structure
becoming a WBS Entry). Each component must be occur, can often be traced to a poorly developed or
logically distinct, as everyone who sees the WBS needs to nonexistent WBS. A poorly constructed WBS can result in
understand what the deliverable or outcome will be from adverse project outcomes including ongoing, repeated
each WBS Entry. Continue the decomposition until you project re-plans and extensions, unclear work assignments,
reach an appropriate level of detail. When all committed scope creep or unmanageable, frequently changing scope,
deliverables have been decomposed to the appropriate budget overrun, missed deadlines and unusable new
level of detail (becoming Activities), examine each WBS products or delivered features. The WBS is a foundation of
Entry and Activity to see if there are required deliverables project initiating, planning, executing, and monitoring and
that are not already in the WBS but that will be needed to controlling processes used to manage projects.
create something that already is in the WBS. Take all these
required deliverables, and decompose them to the For example, the WBS utilizes the Project Charter as its
appropriate level of detail, just as you did for the starting point. The high-level elements in the WBS should
committed deliverables. Level the hierarchy to the extent match, word-for-word, the nouns used to describe the
that it is possible. At this stage of development, the WBS outcomes of the project in the Scope Statement. In
may have some Activities/Tasks at level two, some at level addition, the Resource Breakdown Structure (RBS)
three, and so on. See if the hierarchy can be modified so describes the project’s resource organization and can be
that the number of levels that Activities/Tasks fall into is used in conjunction with the WBS to define work package
reduced to a short range. Do this for every WBS Entry, assignments. The WBS Dictionary defines, details, and
attempting to get each entry in the WBS to decompose into clarifies the various elements of the WBS. The Network
5 to 9 lower level entries. You should never make these Diagram is a sequential arrangement of the work defined
changes if the merger or split of a WBS Entry does not by the WBS and the elements of the WBS are starting
make logical sense. When you think you have a completed points for defining the activities included in the Project
WBS, validate it using a bottom-up approach. A Schedule.
bottom-up validation works like this: - For each WBS
Entry that decomposes into Activities, ask yourself the
question: “If I had all the deliverables from each of these
Activities, would my WBS Entry deliverable be
complete?” If the answer is yes, move on to the next WBS
Entry. If the answer is no, add in the missing Activities.
Once the evaluation of the lowest level WBS Entries and
Activities is complete, examine the next higher level of
WBS Entries. Keeping with our three-level example, for
each Phase ask: “If I had the deliverables from the WBS
Entries that are part of this Phase, would the Phase
deliverable be complete?” If the answer is yes, move on to
the next one, if the answer is no than add in the missing
WBS Entries or go back to step 4 and rebalance the
hierarchy, or both. When you have completed your
bottom-up validation, it is now appropriate to re-evaluate
the entire WBS one last time by comparing the currently
Fig1. The work breakdown structure illustrated in a block diagram
defined WBS deliverables to the originally defined
objectives for the project. Ask yourself the question, “If I
The PERT Coordinating Group (1962) defined a work
had all these deliverables, would I achieve the planned
package (WP) as ‘‘The work required to complete a
objectives for the project?” If the answer is yes, you can
specific job or process, such as a report, a design, a
move on to the next step. If the answer is no, you still
documentation requirement or portion thereof, a piece of
have a lot of work to do.
hardware, or a service.’’ PMI (1996) states: ‘‘[A] work
package is a deliverable at the lowest level of the WBS.’’
4.4 Why Work Breakdown Structure? Unfortunately, there is no accepted definition of the WPs
nor accepted approach to link them with other related
The Importance of the WBS Experienced project managers structures (foremost among them the OBS). In most cases,
know there are many things that can go wrong in projects the WPs are defined in an informal, intuitive manner and
regardless of how successfully they plan and execute their without proper feedback loops to verify their definition.
work. Component or full-project failures, when they do
International Journal of Commerce and Management Studies (IJCAMS)
Vol.3, No.2, June 2018
www.ijcams.com
from an improperly defined WBS without starting over, so project. Project teams should start thinking of WBS as an
it is worthwhile to finish the WBS design before starting a instrument which can be twisted to suit the specific project
project plan or project schedule. A WBS is not an scope needs. There is no hard and fast rule that one needs
organizational hierarchy. Some practitioners make the to break-up a requirement into three levels or four levels. It
mistake of creating a WBS that shadows the organizational is up to the project teams and the project manager to
chart. While it is common for responsibility to be assigned decide on the degree to which a particular
to organizational elements, a WBS that shadows the requirement/scope needs to be broken-down to in order to
organizational structure is not descriptive of the project make it meaningful and reasonable for successful
scope and is not outcome-oriented. Short-term memory implementation, monitoring and delivery. There might be
capacity should not dictate the size and span of a WBS tree some requirements that are straightforward and which
structure. Some reference material suggests that each WBS would not take a couple of weeks to implement- then in
level be limited to 5-9 elements because that is a that case the requirement itself can be assumed as a work
theoretical limit to short-term memory. It is far more package spanning across two weeks duration and the
important to construct a logical grouping of planned output of the final deliverable also is clearly understood
outcomes than to worry about the limits of short term since the original requirement defines it with precision.
human memory. WBS updates, other than progressive One other vital aspect that projects teams need to bear in
elaboration of details, require formal change control. This mind is to ensure that they always keep an open
is another reason why a WBS should be outcome-oriented communication channel with the Customer/Client and the
and not be prescriptive of methods. Methods can and do various stakeholders of the project throughout the process
changes frequently, but changes in planned outcomes of WBS creation. One should not assume that since the
require a higher degree of formality. If outcomes and team is breaking-up scope into smaller elements and
actions are blended, change control may be too rigid for creating a WBS, discussion with the stakeholders is not
actions and too informal for outcomes. necessary – that would be one of the biggest blunders.
Bottom line is that how can one break-up a larger scope
5.1. Avoid Common Mistakes into the required smaller elements unless they are clear on
the final product change or the functionality that is
The process of creating a WBS should be considered as a expected from the project. Breaking-up scope into smaller
team building activity. For projects of normal size, a WBS activities is not going to help unless one is clear on the
cannot be created by one team member. It needs various actual output desired from the given requirements.
team members to take-up each high level requirement
within the given scope, the whole team and then each lead 7. Conclusion
team members need to come-up with the
activity/work-package break-up details related to that WBS is an effective tool for Project Management in the
specific requirement. Likewise, the activity details are planning and execution of a successful project. It is very
arrived at the other lead team members and the project useful in tacking cost, schedule and quality failures in
team consolidates all the deliverables information received project management life cycle.
and collates back to a fully blown WBS which can then
further be sued for the next steps of project planning and References
scheduling. A WBS is not a project plan or a project
schedule. It only provides detailed information on the [1] PROJECT MANAGEMENT PRACTICES Work Breakdown
given initial scope and on the final deliverables that need Structure (Rev E, June 2003)
to be implemented to achieve the project goals and [2] Creating WBS : Copyright © 2000 Artemis Management
objectives. It should be understood that WBS helps in Systems
giving an accurate input for creating a project schedule by [3] Practice Standard for WBS 2nd edition by Project
Management Institute, Inc.
way of the activity/work package information. Project
[4] How to plan and organize a project by Michael D. Taylor
teams typically assume that as part of a WBS creation, [5] Building a Project Work Breakdown Structure: Visualizing
they need to go into details of the high-level requirement – Objectives, Deliverables, Activities, and Schedules by
which is correct. But one needs to understand that this Dennis P. Miller, PMP
drilling down of the high-level requirement should not be [6] Work package: Work Breakdown Structure BOAZ GOLANY
taken down to the lowest level of the detail which makes it AVRAHAM SHTUB Technion—Israel Institute of
cumbersome for the project team members itself to Technology
monitor and it also leads to micro-management from a
project managers perspective which is not healthy for any
International Journal of Commerce and Management Studies (IJCAMS)
Vol.3, No.2, June 2018
www.ijcams.com