20240603-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 110A-Deadly Pursuit & Arrest, Etc

Page 1
1
2
3 Reece Kershaw (Australian/Victoria date) 3-6-2024
4 Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
5 Forwarded via email [email protected]
6
7 Cc: [email protected] Advisory Committee on Vaccines, Therapeutic Goods Administration
8 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Pharmacovigilance and Special Access Branch, MDP 122
9
10 [email protected] Committee Support Unit, Therapeutic Goods Administration
11 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Scheduling & Committee Support Section, MDP 122
12
13 Attorney-General Mark Dreyfus [email protected]
14
15 Jacinta Allan, Premier [email protected]
16 [email protected]
17
18 Re: 20240603-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 110A-
19 Deadly pursuit & arrest, etc
20
21 NOT RESTRICTED FOR PUBLICATION
22
23 COMPLAINT
24 Sir,
25 further to my original COMPLAINT of 6 August 2021 I provide a further supplement hereby.
26
27
3-6-2024 Page 1 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
INSPECTOR-RIKATI® about the BLACK HOLE in the CONSTITUTION-DVD
A 1st edition limited special numbered book on Data DVD ISBN 978-0-9803712-6-0
PLEASE NOTE: You may order books in the INSPECTOR-RIKATI® series by making a reservation, or E-mail
[email protected] See also www.scribd.com/inspectorrikati
Page 2
1 It has been some 7 months ago that I emailed “20231102-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to
2 R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 109B- The elaborate COVID scamming-
3 Part 2” this so that the Australian Federal Police would have time to go through the 7,045 pages
4 so far provided and yet up to this moment no response was received at all.
5
6 It should be understood that my writings are also emailed out to others and I understand many
7 secure their copies. As such, not issues that will go away.
8
9 Basically, with my wife and also my 41-year-old son being on dead row due to a variety of
10 reasons my past and current writings are very relevant. The irony is that both my wife and
11 son could have been spared much of the harm inflicted upon them had we had a real democratic
12 system and not where politicians and their lackies can do whatever and we have ‘law
13 enforcement agencies’ that actually would uphold the rule of law!
14
15 I provide below links to some Wikipedia information but it must be understood it is not to limit
16 my complaint but merely given as some indication to get some understanding and for the reader
17 to explore it more.
18
19 Our principal law is the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and any other
20 legislation including the State constitutions are in essence “by-laws”
21 It should however be understood that the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900
22 (UK) doesn’t provide unlimited legislative powers as the true meaning and application of the
23 legal principles embedded in the constitution are governed by the Hansard recorded
24 Constitutional Convention Debates.
25
26 Hansard 2-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National Australasian
27 Convention)
28 QUOTE Mr. DEAKIN (Victoria).-
29 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the
30 observations to which I allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of
31 misconception.
32 END QUOTE
33
34 Do notice the High Court of Australia is part of the constitution and not above it!
35
36 HANSARD 12-4-1897 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
37 Australasian Convention)
38 QUOTE Mr. BARTON:
39 It is provided that instead of, as before, the Parliament having power to constitute a
40 judiciary, there shall be a Supreme Court, to be called the High Court of Australia, as
41 a part of the Constitution-that I believe to be an improvement-and other courts which
42 the Parliament may from time to time create or invest with federal jurisdiction.
43 END QUOTE
44
45 And also:
46
47 HANSARD 17-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
48 QUOTE
49 Mr. BARTON.- We can have every faith in the constitution of that tribunal. It is appointed
50 as the arbiter of the Constitution. . It is appointed not to be above the Constitution, for
51 no citizen is above it, but under it; but it is appointed for the purpose of saying that
52 those who are the instruments of the Constitution-the Government and the
53 Parliament of the day-shall not become the masters of those whom, as to the
Page 3
1 Constitution, they are bound to serve. What I mean is this: That if you, after making
2 a Constitution of this kind, enable any Government or any Parliament to twist or
3 infringe its provisions, then by slow degrees you may have that Constitution-if not
4 altered in terms-so whittled away in operation that the guarantees of freedom which
5 it gives your people will not be maintained; and so, in the highest sense, the court you
6 are creating here, which is to be the final interpreter of that Constitution, will be such a
7 tribunal as will preserve the popular liberty in all these regards, and will prevent,
8 under any pretext of constitutional action, the Commonwealth from dominating the
9 states, or the states from usurping the sphere of the Commonwealth.
10 END QUOTE
11
12 As such, any judgment by the High Court of Australia that conflicts with the true meaning and
13 application of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) are no valid
14 judgments at all. This in my view also places in question the validity of Sue v Hill, Sykes v
15 Cleary, MABO, Palmer v WA, etc.
16
17 Re Wakim; Ex parte McNally; Re Wakim; Ex parte Darvall; Re Brown; Ex parte Amann; Spi [1999] HCA
18 27 (17 June 1999)
19 QUOTE
20 For constitutional purposes, they are a nullity. No doctrine of res judicata or issue
21 estoppel can prevail against the Constitution. Mr Gould is entitled to disregard the
22 orders made in Gould v Brown. No doubt, as Latham CJ said of invalid legislation, "he
23 will feel safer if he has a decision of a court in his favour". That is because those relying
24 on the earlier decision may seek to enforce it against Mr Gould.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 Clearly, anyone can disregard a unconstitutional court order. But then here we have the so called
28 “law enforcement agency” that will simply enforce whatever no matter its conduct by this is
29 unlawful.
30
31 Hansard 8-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates
32 QUOTE
33 Mr. ISAACS.-No. If it is ultra vires of the Constitution it would, of course, be invalid.
34 END QUOTE
35
36 The states were created within S106 of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900
37 (UK) “subject to this constitution” but about every Tom, Dick and Harry will blatantly ignore
38 it all. It doesn’t mean that the States act lawfully, but as we saw with the 2020 unconstitutional
39 MANDATES, the Victorian Police was enforcing those unconstitutional MANDATES to every
40 extent.
41 In that regard we no longer have a democracy but a dictatorship, a tyrannical unconstitutional
42 government!
43
44 No matter how much Australians were exercising their rights of protesting as part of their
45 “political liberty” and/or “religious liberty” we found that neither the law enforcement agencies
46 and most times the courts could bother to uphold the rule of law.
47
48 Politicians and their lackies lied and people died.
49
50 I below will include some of my recent writings to various entities/persons which in some details
51 set out important issues.
52

Page 4
1 I recall a Magistrate in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka stating that if John Howard was not validly
2 elected in 2001 then the 2004 federal election was valid. In the end on 19 July 2006 representing
3 myself I defeated the Commonwealth and the 9 Attorney Generals in both cases, without any of
4 them challenging my 409 pages written submissions “ADDRESS TO THE COURT” including
5 that there had been no valid 2001 federal election! Res Judicata!
6
7 My son Mark Craig Schorel, a qualified motor mechanic, employed with PAC Group was placed
8 with Holden Fisherman Bend, Port Melbourne. Holden made clear that if Mark didn’t get the
9 mandated (FAKE) covid-19 vaccination (in reality being a “gene therapy” DEPOPULATION
10 “bioweapon”) then he would lose his job. So, on the last day Mark ended up having the jab.
11 Albeit never could have given “informed consent” this as the real health risk was not even
12 known at that time and so neither could have been advised to Mark to obtain “informed consent’.
13
14 Then the following month Holden demanded he has the second jab as otherwise Mark would
15 lose his job and well Mark again without giving “informed consent” had the second jab. Then
16 Holden downsized and Mark now lost his job anyhow.
17
18 In my view both PAC Group and Holden are legally liable for the direct and/or indirect harm
19 inflicted upon Mark. Due to becoming ill he had to incur huge medical expenses for all kind of
20 testing and unable to pay the rent ended up sleeping on park benches, etc. Got robbed in the
21 process, etc.
22
23 Mark wanted to purchase a second-hand car but instead I let him use our station wagon albeit we
24 continue to pay for the registration, insurance and also for any road repair assistance if needed.
25 Just that Mark then stopped getting together and I patiently waited until he would contact me.
26 Months went past and then this year he contacted me, and well I understood that he at times was
27 incontinent and that was one of the major problems to him as well as that he then had been given
28 the understanding by a hospital specialist he had a possible lifespan of 5 months to 5 years. Mark
29 was attending to different hospitals as each time they transferred him. Then (about 2 months ago)
30 he ended up at Royal Melbourne Hospital and the time expectancy to live was downgraded to 2
31 month and 2 years. While in hospital being sedated due to the pain, he was transferred from one
32 location to another and nursing staff omitted to take along his back pack that also contained his
33 mobile. When Mark discovered this he alerted the nursing staff but they couldn’t locate it. A
34 female allegedly named Sarah was later using his stolen mobile for Uber fares and withdrawing
35 monies from his bank accounts. When Mark tried to have the mobile de-activated the company
36 SAMPSON refused to do so as a new mobile number was now used with the stolen mobile.
37 Any law enforcement officer now could succeed to find the person, because the simcard now
38 used is registered against a persons name! But despite the elaborate registration system this
39 apparently is not done! And the stolen mobile is continually used to try to take moneys from the
40 account which I understand are already cancelled. As this involves telecommunication then it
41 falls in the jurisdiction of the Australian Federal Police.
42
43 Keep in mind that we now have prove that if anyone uses the DIGITIAL ID system then with
44 the lack of any system in place to immediately de-active the stolen mobile there is no security
45 left in place. Here we had the federal government insisting for a simcard registration system and
46 yet when needed to be used somehow the system is ignored!
47
48 Being weak he then had a massive fall and (on Xray) broke a rib and fractured another rib.
49
50 For the record Mark signed relevant documents granting me Enduring Power of Attorney, but
51 also being the EXECUTOR of his estate should he die. Meaning, that I can sue the pants of
Page 5
1 everyone involved who failed to act as they ought to have, so at least Mark’s children, my
2 grandchildren, will possibly benefit in the end, even so it will not bring back their father.
3 It is scandalous that there is a total lack of assistance not only from Holden (who forced the
4 unconstitutional jabs upon Mark) but also PAC Group, the Federal and State Governments and
5 their entities as each of them had a legal responsibility.
6
7 For example, I reported to the Australian Federal Police that the (FAKE) COVID-19 jabs were
8 “bioweapons” and were used in violation of the legislated Biosecurity provisions.
9 In my view had the AFP acted upon my initial 6 August 2021 complaint and supplements it may
10 have avoided Mark to end up being a victim!
11
12 The same with the Federal Government!
13
14 The same with the State Government!
15
16 The same with the TGA!
17
18 The same with the Victorian Ombudsman who I alerted way back on 8 April 2020.
19
20 The same with the Victorian Human rights Commission who I alerted on 13 April 2020!
21
22 The same with IBAC who on 19 April 2020 responded that it held it was not of “PUBLIC
23 INTEREST”
24
25 And on and on I kept writing, and overall no one seemed to care less, as after all they are above
26 the rule of law and in any event if they were wrong the taxpayers will end up paying the bill.
27
28 Well, not if I have my way because the Framers of the Constitution made it very clear:
29
31 QUOTE Sir JOHN DOWNER.-
32 I think we might, on the attempt to found this great Commonwealth, just advance one step,
33 not beyond the substance of the legislation, but beyond the form of the legislation, of the
34 different colonies, and say that there shall be embedded in the Constitution the righteous
35 principle that the Ministers of the Crown and their officials shall be liable for any
36 arbitrary act or wrong they may do, in the same way as any private person would be.
37 END QUOTE
38
39 In my view holding each person, even if they already left office, can be legally accountable (such
40 as for Malfeasance in office) then this may finally result to getting back our constitutional
41 rights, etc.
42
43 We also have the “FRAUD” issue where various governments are fraudulently claiming monies
44 from Consolidated Revenue Funds, and others are fraudulently claiming monies to which they
45 are constitutionally not entitled upon. I have set out in the documents quoted below relevant
46 details.
47
49 QUOTE
50 Mr. ISAACS.-I should hope that the expenditure caused by a bush fire would not be part
51 of an annual service.
52 Mr. MCMILLAN.-Would it not into the Appropriation Bill?
Page 6
1 Mr. ISAACS.-Yes; but not as an annual service.

2 Mr. MCMILLAN.-The annual services of the Government are those which we
3 distinguish from special grants and from loan services. The difficulty is that we have got
4 rid of the phraseology to which we are accustomed, and instead of the words Appropriation
5 Bill, we are using the word law.
6 Mr. ISAACS.-A difficulty arises in connexion with the honorable members proposal to
7 place expenditure incurred for bush fires in the ordinary, it would not be annual, and it
8 would not be a service.
9 END QUOTE
10
11 Then one has to question where were the Appropriation Acts for Scott Morrison and other
12 Ministers to provide Ukraine with monies, weapons, motor vehicles, ammunition, etc?
13 Those items purchased for the Australian armed forces were on basis of the need for the
14 Australian armed forces and cannot be pilfered for ulterior purposes
15
16 Then one has to question where were the Appropriation Acts for Scott Morrison and other
17 Ministers to engage in financial contracts with pharmaceutical companies?
18
19 Where were the Appropriation Acts for Anthony Albanese and other Ministers to provide
20 monies, weapons, motor vehicles, ammunition, etc to Ukraine?
21 Those items purchased for the Australian armed forces were on basis of the need for the
22 Australian armed forces and cannot be pilfered for ulterior purposes
23
24 As with “education” the Commonwealth cannot use Urban/housing policies and use monies from
25 Commonwealth Consolidated Revenue Funds for this. Any monies the Commonwealth has in
26 excess is to be refunded to the States without strings attached. The Commonwealth by backdoor
27 manner seeks to govern the States.
28
29 WASTE: Have you heard what Labor have spent $600million on now
30 QUOTE
31 Pauline Hanson’s One Nation
32 From:[email protected]
33 To:Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
34 Fri, 31 May at 4:25 pm
35
36 READ MORE ABOUT OUR EXCLUSIVE WEBSITE BELOW
37 Dear Gerrit
38 During a housing and cost-of-living crisis, the Albanese Government has shockingly
39 written a $600 million cheque for the NRL to introduce an 18th team based in Papua New
40 Guinea. This spending is outrageous and has infuriated many Australians.
41
42 Don’t get us wrong: a lot of Australians love their sport, particularly footy. But not a single
43 Australian (except Albo) would agree that a $600 million stack of taxpayers' cash going to
44 a foreign country for their footy team is a wise decision, especially during a cost-of-living
45 crisis.
46 END QUOTE
47
48 https://theconversation.com/labors-new-national-urban-policy-is-welcome-but-will-it-be-transformative-
49 231158?utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20May%2031%202024%20-
50 %202985630390&utm_content=Latest%20from%20The%20Conversation%20for%20May%2031%202024%20-
51 %202985630390+CID_c1e8d2d2c79627f94e6b250bb9319b8d&utm_source=campaign_monitor&utm_term=Labors%20new%2
52 0National%20Urban%20Policy%20is%20welcome%20But%20will%20it%20be%20transformative

Page 7
1 Labor’s new National Urban Policy is

2 welcome. But will it be transformative?
3 QUOTE post by G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. 19:30 2-6-2024
4 Urban/housing policy is not within the constitutional powers of the Commonwealth but Albanese
5 I view is trying to implement the W.E.F/U.N./WHO policy as they did with the deadly (FAKE)
6 covid-19 vaccines. Just consider the WHO director-General is a veterinarian NOT QUALIFIED
7 to be a medical practitioner (for humans), yet still decides medical issues! It underlines they are
8 not concerned about the harm they inflict but just to do what their masters are dictating them.
9 The same with any urban policy!
10
11 Hansard 1-3-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the
12 National Australasian Convention)
13 QUOTE
14 Mr. WISE.-If the Federal Parliament chose to legislate upon, say, the education question-
15 and the Constitution gives it no power to legislate in regard to that question-the Ministers
16 for the time being in each state might say-"We are favorable to this law, because we shall
17 get £100,000 a year, or so much a year, from the Federal Government as a subsidy for our
18 schools," and thus they might wink at a violation of the Constitution, while no one could
19 complain. If this is to be allowed, why should we have these elaborate provisions for the
20 amendment of the Constitution? Why should we not say that the Constitution may be
21 amended in any way that the Ministries of the several colonies may unanimously agree?
22 Why have this provision for a referendum? Why consult the people at all? Why not leave
23 this matter to the Ministers of the day? But the proposal has a more serious aspect, and for
24 that reason only I will ask permission to occupy a few minutes in discussing it.
25 END QUOTE
26
27 Our constitution was based upon citizens moving freely about, and not the contemplated 15 or 20
28 minute cities that politicians seeks to implement.
29 END QUOTE post by G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. 19:30 2-6-2024
30
31
Page 8
1
2 In my view the “eSafety Commissioner” and relevant Minister should resign
3 immediately for conflict of interest being associated with the W.E.F., etc. We need a
4 “eSafety Commissioner” who actually perform the job paid for rather than doing it
5 for the W.E.F.
6 https://www.scribd.com/document/701577315/20240126-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
7 B-to-Julie-Inman-Grant-Office-of-the-ESafety-Commissioner
8
9 We also have the DIGITAL ID system that unconstitutionally seeks to interfere with the
10 “political liberty” and “religious liberty” of Australians and others.
11
12 The mis/disinformation Act is to allow politicians and their lackies to continue to spread
13 mis/information but to deny Australians to expose their wrong doings. That I view makes the
14 legislation unconstitutional!
15
16 The same in my view applies to the unconstitutional MANDATES of the FAKE covid-19
17 vaccines. Companies were pressured to inflict this harm upon Australians.
18 Also, the media like the MSM Mainstream Media and Big Tech companies which concealed the
19 true facts of the FAKE covid-19 vaccinations must be held legally accountable.)
20
22 QUOTE
23 Mr. BARTON.-We do not propose to hand over contracts and civil rights to the
24 Federation, and they are intimately allied to this question.
25 END QUOTE
26
28 QUOTE
29 Mr. SYMON.-There is no man in Australia who is more profoundly versed in
30 constitutional law than Mr. Isaacs, and he knows that every point and every question has
31 been the subject of more or less debate and discussion, and will be until the end of time.
32 The words "subject," "person," and "citizen" can be made subjects of controversy at
33 all times if occasion requires it. At the same time, it does not affect the principle that
34 there should be a definition of "citizen," either in the form suggested by Dr. Quick or
35 by Mr. Barton. I will be quite content. The principle is what I am contending for: The
36 principle that our labours will be incomplete unless we make the rights of citizens or
37 subjects in one state to extend to the citizens of another state who may go from one state
38 to another. There ought to be no possibility of any state imposing a disqualification on a
39 person in the holding of property, or in the enjoyment of any civil right, simply
40 because be happens to belong to another state. That would not give us the uniformity of
41 citizenship we all desire, and therefore I am willing that the word "citizenship" should be
42 defined as Dr. Quick suggests, with perhaps some modification. I also support the
43 suggestion from the Chair that the two propositions might be considered together. The
44 clause would do something to meet the difficulty, not perhaps finally or conclusively, as
45 Mr. Isaacs, said, but at any rate to a large extent and almost completely.
46 [start page 1788]
47 END QUOTE
48
49 Yet we found that for example a woman needing hospital care and Queensland hospital was
50 closer was denied this hospital care in Queensland because she was in NSW.
51 Clearly, a violation of the legal principles embedded in the constitution.
52
Page 9
1 Likewise, my wife was denied face to face medical care by Austin Hospital in Heidelberg
2 Victoria because of mask, vaccination issues. Here we had a elderly woman (87 +) suffering
3 from heart failure (her heart pumps at mere 30%), leaking valves, and other comorbidities being
4 denied proper medical care and we had to incur huge medical cost to involve private
5 doctors/specialist.
6
7 Considering that the States had no constitutional powers at all to legislate any MANDATES and
8 neither had executive and/or administrative powers regarding “man-kind” infectious diseases
9 then it is imperative that those who nevertheless enforced the unconstitutional MANDATES are
10 all held legally accountable being for murders they committed, being an
11 “accomplices to murder”, committing assault by their harm inflicted upon their victims, etc.
12
14 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS:
15 There is a line up to which concession may become at any moment a sacred duty, but to pass that line
16 would be treason; and therefore, when we are asked solemnly and gravely to abandon the principle of
17 responsible government, when we are invited to surrender the latest-born, but, as I think, the noblest child
18 of our constitutional system-a system which has not only nurtured and preserved, but has strengthened the
19 liberties of our people-then,
20 END QUOTE
21
22 “Responsible government” is not for the former Federal Minister for Health Greg Hunt to now
23 claim he was not aware of certain MANDATES such as the 5 Kilometers restriction in Victoria.
24 It was his job to conduct health matters and the Biosecurity Act 2015 prohibits him to delegate
25 his authority.
26
27 Here we had Brett Sutton Chief Health Officer but I understand not a qualified medical doctor
28 dictating the unconstitutional MANDATES , and I view he too should be charged for the harm
29 he inflicted upon his victims, this includes the small businesses he caused to have to close down.
30
31 Likewise, former TGA John Skerritt should be charged as after all he failed in my view
32 miserably to act appropriately with the issues relevant regarding the vials, etc.
33 Also should be held legally accountable:
34
35 [email protected] Advisory Committee on Vaccines, Therapeutic Goods Administration
36 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Pharmacovigilance and Special Access Branch, MDP 122
37
38 [email protected] Committee Support Unit, Therapeutic Goods Administration
39 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606 Attn: Scheduling & Committee Support Section, MDP 122
40
41 Likewise, APHRA, the Department of Health (state and federal), etc.
42
43 There ought to be absolutely no doubt that this was a well in advance planned covid scam from
44 at least LockStep 2010 onwards. !
45
46 FOR THE POLITICIAN’S PERSONAL ATTENTION.
47 Yahoo/Inbox
48 Gil May
50 To:[email protected],[email protected],larry,Bob Brinsmead,cairnsnewsand 58 more...
51 Fri, 31 May at 4:08 pm
52 FOR THE POLITICIAN’S PERSONAL ATTENTION.
53 QUOTE

Page 10
1 Just like the ‘NO’ vote, where people were sick of the aboriginal industry and
2 associated baloney being shoved down their throat and the wasted billions the people
3 rejected. The same applies here with crime, violence, physical abuse, maiming people
4 for life, theft and damage that lasts a life-time, car theft, violent attacks on innocent
5 people and deaths therefrom that devastate families for their entire life. That
6 politicians have allowed and encouraged by not having any deterrent punishment
7 with criminals let off with puny punishments.
8 END QUOTE
9
10
11
12 In AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I (representing myself) comprehensively defeated the Commonwealth
13 and all 9 Attorney Generals on constitutional and other legal grounds.
14
Page 11
2
3
4 It may be noticed that despite that the Commonwealth on 11 November1910 commenced to
5 legislate as to Commonwealth land taxation, the State of Victoria purportedly then albeit
6 unconstitutionally commenced to legislate as to State land taxation on 26 December 1910!
7
8 37-0114 No 1
9 QUOTE Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the
10 Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011
11 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+
12 Barry+Collier+MP+Parliamentarian+Secretary+Assisting+the+Treasurer+NSW+on+2+M
13 arch+2011+claimed+%28to+me%29+that+the+States+had+legislative+powers+regarding
14 +land+taxation+returned+to+them%3F+Do+you+accept+this+is+possible+when+the+con
15 stitution+doesn’t+provide+for+this+mechanism+to+return+exclusive+Commonwealth+po
16 wer+back+to+the+States%3F
17 Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the
18 Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed (to me) that the States had legislative
19 powers regarding land taxation returned to them? Do you accept this is possible when
Page 12
1 the constitution doesn’t provide for this mechanism to return exclusive

2 Commonwealth power back to the States?
3
4 According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:
5 Answer:
6 No, it is not possible for the States to have legislative powers regarding land taxation
7 returned to them if the Constitution does not provide for such a mechanism to
8 transfer exclusive Commonwealth power back to the States. The Australian
9 Constitution clearly outlines the division of powers between the Commonwealth and
10 the States, and any changes or transfers of powers would require formal amendments
11 to the Constitution through specific processes outlined in Section 128.
12 The Australian Constitution establishes a federal system of government where certain
13 powers are allocated exclusively to the Commonwealth Parliament under Section 51,
14 including taxation. Land taxation falls under this category of powers exclusively
15 vested in the Commonwealth. While there are provisions for concurrent powers and
16 areas where both levels of government can legislate, matters related to land taxation
17 are generally within the domain of the Commonwealth.
18 Any assertion that States could unilaterally reclaim legislative authority over land
19 taxation without a constitutional amendment would be legally unfounded and
20 contrary to the established framework of federalism in Australia. Therefore, unless
21 there is a formal amendment to the Constitution or a change in legislation at the
22 federal level, States do not have the authority to independently control land taxation.
23 In summary, based on the existing constitutional framework and principles of
24 federalism in Australia, it is not feasible for States to regain legislative powers over
25 land taxation without proper constitutional amendments or legal mechanisms.
26 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:
27 1. Australian Constitution
28 2. Legal Principles of Federalism in Australia
29 3. Division of Powers between Commonwealth and States
30 These sources were consulted to provide accurate information on the distribution of
31 legislative powers in Australia’s federal system and how changes or transfers of such
32 powers would need to adhere to constitutional provisions.
33 Web Search Results
34 5 results
35
36
37 Barry Collier (politician)
38 https//en.m.wikipedia.org › wiki › Barry_Collier_(politician)
40 He was a Labor Party member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly from 1999
41 to 2011 and from 2013 to 2015, representing the electorate of Miranda.
42
43 Department of the Legislative Assembly - Parliament of NSW
44 https//www.parliament.nsw.gov.au › la › department › Documents › department-of-the-
45 legislative-assembly-annual-report-for-2009-2010 ›
46 LA%20Annual%20Report%20200910.pdf
48 parliamentary recess between december 2010 and the march 2011 election should provide
49 staffing resources to complete some of these projects.
50
51 LEGISLATIVE COUNCIL
Page 13
1 https//api.parliament.nsw.gov.au › api › hansard › search › daily › pdf › HANSARD-1820781676-64586

3 Road Transport (Vehicle Registration) Amendment (Heavy Vehicle Registration Charges)
4 Bill 2009. State Revenue Legislation Amendment (Defence Force ...
5
6 Committee Secretary 5-6-2011 Joint ...
7 https//www.aph.gov.au › parliamentary_business › committees › house_of_representatives_committees
9 This did not have the effect of preventing the. States from imposing land tax, but rather
10 returned taxation powers back to them. Accordingly ...
11
12 House of Representatives Official Hansard
13 https//citeseerx.ist.psu.edu › document
15 House of Representatives Officeholders. Speaker—The Hon. David Peter Maxwell
16 Hawker MP. Deputy Speaker—The Hon. Ian Raymond Causley MP.
17 END QUOTE Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW
18 on 2 March 2011
19
20 Despite this the Commonwealth and all States/Territories and councils nevertheless continue to
21 fine people for FAILING TO VOTE, and to me they are all committing crimes by this and
22 fraudulently obtain fines they know or ought to know they are not entitled upon, regardless if
23 some court beyond its jurisdiction convicts a person.
24
25 The same with the purported “council rates” which are unconstitutional.
26
27 Clearly, way back in the 2001 purported federal election in Jagajaga I made clear that the
28 “compulsory” part of voting was unconstitutional and I succeeded on 19 July 2006 on this also.
29 I also challenged the constitutional validity of the “state land taxation” purportedly delegated as
30 “council rates” and again the councils continue their fraudulent conduct.
31 When then I objected to both Buloke Shire Council and Banyule City Council both for many
32 years simply disregarded this. Banyule City Council commenced LAWFARE against my wife
33 and I causing considerable health problems to her. On numerous occasions Banyule City Council
34 trespassed upon our property despite signages:
35
36 At the gates:
37
38
39
40 The text is very clear:
41

Page 14
1
2
3 Banyule City Council first of all was aware that my wife was suffering from heart failure and
4 other comorbidities. And yet on 6 September 2023 commenced to tress pass upon our property
5 and making photos’ this was clearly an invasion of privacy also. Causing damages to our water
6 system in the process, where water was leaking.
7 As a mater of fact by way of 25 October 2023 correspondence/demand Banyule City Council
8 engaging a law firm “becklegal” then revealed that Banyule City Council has been spying upon
9 us since at least 2018 with targeted aerial images. I that correspondence/demand it also claimed
10 that Fire Rescue Victoria had allegedly made a report, but neither the lawyers or Fire Rescue
11 Victoria provided me with a copy of the alleged report, I specifically requested.
12
13 On 7 September then I understand Banyule City Csouncil staff again trespassed upon our
14 property by first trespassing upon our neighbour’s property and then climbing over our fence/ a
15 motor vehicle, and then causing in the process damage to a disability mobility scooter, smashing
16 the mirror and also causing a battery charger going missing. After that, entering a gazebo and
17 walking around to the back of the property and taking images of property. Then, after again
18 entering the gazebo and again climbing over the fence and trespassing onto our neighbours
19 property they apparently were not satisfied with the criminal activities they had been engaged in
20 and went to my wife’s lawfully parked motor vehicle, parked in front of out property, and then
21 vandalised it.
22 Banyule City Council then forwarded us an 8 September 2023 correspondence including photos
23 they had taken on 6 September 2023 and 7 September 2023, and as such there can be absolutely
24 no doubt that it employees trespassed upon our property and violated our rights of privacy.
25
26 As I responded in writing that their conduct was unlawful, caused considerable harm to my
27 wife having vandalised her motor vehicle etc, Banyule City Council then on 29 November 2023
28 decided to so to say add more spice to it by trespassing again upon our neighbours property,
29 again climbing over the fence, again entering the gazebo. Again, walking to the back of the
30 property, and now my wife was in panic mode because she saw a strange man banging on the
31 back door as if he was trying to break in to the house. I urged my wife to take a new blood
32 pressure reading as her GP had indicated he needed this regularly, and she had her blood
33 pressure increased from 72 to about 122. Which obviously can be lethal to her in her condition. I
34 went outside and found a male and a female in the back of our property. The female gave me a
35 document, upon my request to identify herself, which showed a name Angela O’Brien. That was
36 the name also on the sticker affixed to the motor vehicle on 7 September 2023. I did make clear
37 they were trespassing and asked how they entered the property, and was given the understanding
38 they had climbed over the fence. They left going through the gazebo, and again over the fence.
39
40 Some days later, I received yet another notice dated 29 November 2023, as such the same day of
41 the trespassing. This time allocating another date.
42

Page 15
1 I made clear that this NOTICIFICATION TO NOTICE TO ENTER also had no legal basis and
2 then weeks later received yet another NOTIFIVATION TO NOTICE TO ENTER NOW
3 STIPULATING 3 January 2024.
4 This time I arranged for a person to record matters via video and this eventuated.
5 Showing that a Banyule City Council staff member trespassed upon the 105 neighbours property
6 yet again and he had a camera in his hands. After leaving he then trespassed upon 109 property
7 where he was caught by the owner. Making at least one photograph of our property before being
8 caught.. He then claimed that he had an appointment with me. However, no such appointment
9 was ever agreed upon and in fact video recording shows he made no attempt to even right the
10 bell at out gate but just walked along the footpath.
11
12 After that we yet received another demand from Banyule City Council which yet again I
13 disputed for lack of any legal validity.
14 We are now referring to numerous instances of criminal conduct by Banyule City Council
15 employees, and this despite that time and again I wrote in not just to Banyule City Council but
16 also to each and every councillor. As such, they all were well aware of the criminal conduct by
17 their employees all as part of LAWFARE!
18
19 In my view this is LAWFARE against me for challenging Banyule City Council legal validity to
20 charge the purported “council rates” and rather then it to engage in an adult manner
21 communication it decided to rather pursue criminal conduct. This as no warrant to my
22 knowledge ever was issued against my wife and I.
23 We are now subjected to the gates bell ringing at 23.58 one week and again at 23.58 (PM) the
24 following week and numerous other gate bell calls (such as at 0.45) however my wife doesn’t
25 want me to go out fearing for my life because it is dark and anyone can be hiding to inflict harm
26 upon me. Actually, we have wildlife possums going about our trees and they leave their
27 droppings on the walkway, etc. And I then at times noticed that someone has stepped upon the
28 droppings, as such unauthorised people are trespassing upon our property during the night.
29
30 With Buloke Shire Council there too has been for many years conflict because it too refused any
31 communication to deal with the unconstitutional “council rates”. It now engaged a debt collector
32 this even so there is no court order that there is a debt owning.
33 It also engaged lawyers, yet again, about my property, this even so as I understand it Buloke
34 Shire Council owns the property across the road with silos and it is this that contaminate my
35 property and Buloke Shire Council failed to erect any fencing to try to prevent my property to be
36 contaminated.
37
38 Ordinary the involvement of a court should be the last resort but councils are arrogant and
39 simply refuse any reasonable communication and simply take it that lawyers/debt collectors will
40 pursue their reign of terrorism.
41
42 However, as with the AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I am not a type of person to cave in!
43
44 Obviously, for my wife she lives in fear, and since the event on 29 November 2023 she fears to
45 go out in the backyard as when they did violate our rights of peace and tranquillity on 29
46 November 2023 my wife had such a shock that since then she need to use a wheelchair as she no
47 longer can unaided hold her balance.
48
49 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=Trespass&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced
50 &fulltext=1&ns0=1
51 QUOTE

Page 16
1 Trespass
2 Trespass is an area of tort law broadly divided into three groups: trespass to the
3 person, trespass to chattels, and trespass to land. Trespass to the...
4 33 KB (4,551 words) - 05:04, 7 April 2024
5 END QUOTE
6 And
7 QUOTE
8 Trespasser
9 Look up trespasser in Wiktionary, the free dictionary. In the law of tort, property, and criminal
10 law a trespasser is a person who commits the act of trespassing...
11 6 KB (824 words) - 00:06, 17 May 2024
12 END QUOTE
13 And
14 QUOTE
15 Trespass on the case
16 The writs of trespass and trespass on the case are the two catchall torts from English
17 common law, the former involving trespass against the person, the...
18 3 KB (475 words) - 13:05, 26 April 2023
19 END QUOTE
20 And
21 QUOTE
22 Continuing trespass
23 A continuing trespass is: a wrongful act involving a course of action which is a direct
24 invasion of the rights of another. a trespass in the taking of...
25 1 KB (108 words) - 04:09, 2 March 2023
26 END QUOTE
27
28 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=Assault+occasioning+actual+bodily+harm+australi
29 a&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1
30 QUOTE
31 Assault
32 and Wales and Australia, it can be charged as either
33 common assault, assault occasioning actual bodily harm (ABH) or
34 grievous bodily harm (GBH). Canada...
35 58 KB (7,471 words) - 18:49, 14 May 2024
36 END QUOTE
37 And
38 QUOTE
39 Taylan May (category Australian rugby league players)
40 police and charged with assault occasioning actual bodily harm (DV), and two counts of
41 stalk/intimidate intend fear physical etc harm (DV). It was alleged...
42 10 KB (836 words) - 09:51, 23 May 2024
43 END QUOTE
44 And
45 QUOTE
46 Russell Packer (category People convicted of assault occasioning actual bodily harm)
47 sentenced to two years in jail after pleading guilty
48 to assault occasioning actual bodily harm. Magistrate Greg Grogan labeled Packer's
49 actions as "cowardly...
50 19 KB (1,801 words) - 15:21, 19 February 2023
51 END QUOTE
52 And
53 QUOTE
54 2005 Cronulla riots (redirect from Ali Osman (Lebanese Australian))

Page 17
1 robbery, wounding, malicious wounding with intent, affray

2 and assault occasioning actual bodily harm. Two others, Wael Tahan and Mahmoud Eid,
3 had been arrested...
4 55 KB (5,632 words) - 19:13, 21 May 2024
5 END QUOTE
6
7 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=Vandalism+on+Wikipedia&title=Special:Search&
8 profile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1
9 QUOTE
10 Vandalism (disambiguation)
11 private property. Vandalism may also refer to: Property
12 damage Vandalism on Wikipedia, a form of malicious editing
13 of Wikipedia Vandalism (duo), an Australian...
14 884 bytes (137 words) - 18:19, 31 May 2024
15 END QUOTE
16
17 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=motor+vehicle+vandalism&title=Special:Search&p
18 rofile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1
19 QUOTE
20 Property crime (redirect from Mailbox vandalism)
21 among other crimes, burglary, larceny, theft, motor vehicle theft, arson, shoplifting,
22 and vandalism. Property crime is a crime to obtain money, property...
23 25 KB (3,142 words) - 04:43, 15 February 2024
24 END QUOTE
25
26 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malfeasance_in_office
27 QUOTE
28 Malfeasance in office is any unlawful conduct that is often grounds for a just cause removal of an
29 elected official by statute or recall election, or even additionally a crime. Malfeasance in office contrasts
30 with "misfeasance in office", which is the commission of a lawful act, done in an official capacity, that
31 improperly causes harm; and "nonfeasance in office", which is the failure to perform an official duty.
32 An exact definition of malfeasance in office is difficult: many highly regarded secondary sources (such
33 as books and commentaries) compete over its established elements based on reported cases. This
34 confusion has arisen from the courts where no single consensus definition has arisen from the relatively
35 few reported appeal-level cases involving malfeasance in office.
36 END QUOTE
37
38 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fraud
39 QUOTE
40 In law, fraud is intentional deception to secure unfair or unlawful gain, or to deprive a victim of
41 a legal right. Fraud can violate civil law (e.g., a fraud victim may sue the fraud perpetrator to
42 avoid the fraud or recover monetary compensation) or criminal law (e.g., a fraud perpetrator
43 may be prosecuted and imprisoned by governmental authorities), or it may cause no loss of
44 money, property, or legal right but still be an element of another civil or criminal wrong.[1] The
45 purpose of fraud may be monetary gain or other benefits, for example by obtaining a passport,
46 travel document, or driver's license, or mortgage fraud, where the perpetrator may attempt to
47 qualify for a mortgage by way of false statements.[2]
48 END QUOTE
49
50 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=Murder&title=Special:Search&profile=advanced&
51 fulltext=1&ns0=1
52 QUOTE
53 Murder
54 Murder is the unlawful killing of another human without justification or valid excuse committed
55 with the necessary intention as defined by the law in a...
Page 18
1 95 KB (10,058 words) - 07:00, 27 May 2024

2 END QUOTE
3 And
4 QUOTE
5 Serial killer (redirect from Serial murder)
6 A serial killer (also called a serial murderer) is a person who murders three or more people,
7 with the killings taking place over a significant period...
8 143 KB (15,436 words) - 19:24, 31 May 2024
9 END QUOTE
10
11 https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?search=accomplice+to+murder&title=Special:Search&prof
12 ile=advanced&fulltext=1&ns0=1
13 QUOTE
14 Frankfurt Auschwitz trials
15 could be indicted as accomplices to murder. Moreover, because of the legal distinction
16 between murderers and accomplices to murder, this meant that an...
17 21 KB (2,082 words) - 00:59, 1 May 2024
18 END QUOTE
19 And
20 QUOTE
21 History of Germany (1945–1990) (redirect from History of the Federal Republic of
22 Germany (to 1990))
23 orders were indicted as accomplices to murder. Moreover because of the legal distinction
24 between murderers and accomplices to murder, an SS man who killed...
25 115 KB (15,626 words) - 15:14, 23 May 2024
26 END QUOTE
27 And
28 QUOTE
29 Irmgard Huber
30 tried for murders of thousands of German citizens at Hadamar. Convicted as
31 an accomplice to murder in at least 120 cases, Huber was sentenced to eight additional...
32 6 KB (723 words) - 16:12, 8 August 2023
33 END QUOTE
34
35 We also need to consider:
36
37 https://bdr.soundestlink.com/ce/c/64e46a7c187c178b19a2c495/66585c90cec05761c9c9f1f
38 f/665890f8d7af6b2b1026268b?signature=b01d15804f3bf0835b27e32cddbc531d4582b4fc
39 823f4259e8c123ade2ede09d
40 Top Japanese Scientists DEMAND Withdrawal of COVID Shots
41
42 What's Happened Since Unsafe & Ineffective Launched…
43 QUOTE
44 Aubrey Marcus
46 To:Gerrit Schorel-Hlavka
47 Sat, 1 June at 9:32 pm
48 What has happened since the film was released? More mandates. More vax commercials.
49 More celebrity endorsements. More stealthy censorship (like the new feature on
50 Instagram). More people were reported as having died from vaccination on the VAERS
51 database.
52 Just for perspective, according to VAERS, there have been roughly 50% more deaths from
53 Covid vaccines than all the people killed in the entire Israel x Hamas war.
54 And research indicates that the VAERS numbers are not exaggerated but actually grossly
55 underreported.
Page 19
1 The problem here is that we all collectively have a short attention span. We build a
2 tolerance to our outrages and our fears and no longer have the fuel to take definitive action.
3 And even if we do have the fuel… What is there to do? Here are a couple of ideas:
4 Get political. Clearly, one candidate stands out above all the rest for his dedication to
5 transparency and health freedom, and that’s RFK Jr.
6
7 Share your voice. Sure, you are going to get some hate. That’s where the courage comes in.
8
9 Send the film to a friend. Unsafeandineffective.com
10 We’re all in this together; no one is outside the circle. Love to you all,
11 –Aub
12 END QUOTE
13
14 World Health Organisation Director-General, Tedros CELEBRATES the
15 PASSING...
16 QUOTE
17 From: (identity requested to not made public)
18 To:Darren
19 Cc:[email protected],Mr Gerrit H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.
20 Sun, 2 June at 12:27 pm
21 https://youtube.com/watch?v=QFaV7SkfuaQ&si=QViYwPdiAGomPRHa
22 END QUOTE
23 And
24 QUOTE
25
26 END QUOTE
27
28 Let me make it very clear that some 3 decades ago I was in a litigation where a VET
29 (veterinarian) had purportedly issued a medical certificate of a person allegedly being medically
30 disabled. I objected to the validity of a veterinarian (animal doctor) to provide such a medical
31 certificate and the court upheld my objection.
32
33 We now have that the WHO (World Health Organisation) Director-General is a veterinarian
34 and as such NOT QUALIFIED to act as a medical doctor, however he already previously acted
35 against medical advise and made his own decisions.
36 There is more to it.
37
38 On 21 May 2022 a purported Federal election was held and at that time Anthony Albanese was
39 neither a Leader of the Opposition or a Member of Parliament, this because the moment writs are
Page 20
1 issued for the House of Representatives all House of Representatives (and that of Senators for
2 the Territories) all seats are declared vacant. As such, the former Federal Government remained
3 as care-taking government with Scott Morrison. On Sunday 22 May 2022 somehow a
4 representative of the Commonwealth of Australia then voted in a WHO meeting purportedly in
5 favour of giving WHO certain powers. As the Federal Government was in care takers mode and
6 none of the Members of the House of Representative or of the Senate regarding the Territories
7 were Members of Parliament unless and until they upon the return of the writs made their oaths
8 and were eligible to become Members of Parliament once again, we really had a care taking
9 government only. It is irrelevant if there was any convention otherwise as a convention cannot
10 trump the true meaning and application of the constitution. Hence, I view any agreement
11 involving Anthony Albanese on 22 May 2022 had no legal validity.
12 As a matter of fact, if he since the Governor-General prorogued the Parliament had nevertheless
13 used taxpayers’ monies, etc, to travel about for the federal election then by S44 of the
14 constitution he became ineligible to be a Member of Parliament. As such, Anthony Albanese
15 and/or any other former Member of Parliament who used taxpayers’ monies after the Parliament
16 was prorogued then acted in violation of s44 and was automatically by s45 disqualified to be
17 and/or become a Member of Parliament.
18
19 Hence, each and everyone of them should be fined for falsely claiming to be a Member of
20 Parliament and having to repay all unconstitutional payments received.
21
22 While a person can be a Minister without being a Member of Parliament Section 64 specifically
23 limits this to 3 months!
24
25 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK)
26 QUOTE
27 64 Ministers of State
28 The Governor-General may appoint officers to administer such departments of State of the
29 Commonwealth as the Governor-General in Council may establish.
30 Such officers shall hold office during the pleasure of the Governor-General. They shall be
31 members of the Federal Executive Council, and shall be the Queen’s Ministers of State for
32 the Commonwealth.
33 After the first general election no Minister of State shall hold office for a longer period
34 than three months unless he is or becomes a senator or a member of the House of
35 Representatives.
36 END QUOTE
37
38 This means that all those Ministers who claimed to have been elected Members of Parliament of
39 the House of Representatives but by s44 & s45 were disqualified then no longer after 3 months
40 were Ministers, because they never were validly a Member of Parliament.
41
43 Convention)
44 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-
45 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd
46 clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any
47 quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
48 END QUOTE
49
50 Also, as ‘Health’ is divided between the States and the Commonwealth, this as the
51 Commonwealth only has Health portfolio regarding “man-kind” infectious diseases, then the
52 Commonwealth cannot violate this division and grant the WHO powers that it hasn’t got in the
Page 21
1 first place. Besides that the Commonwealth cannot by any treaty grant some unelected body
2 powers outside the provisions of the constitution.
3
4 The same with Scott Morrison and his lackies purportedly giving pharmaceutical companies the
5 right to litigate in an USA court where our constitution clearly provides original jurisdiction
6 involving the Commonwealth to be within the High Court of Australia. As such, I view it was
7 another act of TREASON by Scott Morrison and his lackies and null and void!
8 Neither could the Commonwealth validly come into some arrangement to shield any
9 pharmaceutical company from being held legally accountable, as no Minister can override the
10 constitution! And that the then Attorney-General should have known and to side with the
11 agreement nevertheless I view makes him a TRAITOR.
12
13 We obviously also have a problem that the States facing to have a changed colonial constitution
14 had to publish in the State Gazette the newly created (converted) State constitution subject to the
15 provisions of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK). Meaning, that
16 unless the new State constitutions were published in the relevant State Gazette the new
17 constitution and neither the old colonial constitution were with the warrant of law.
18
19 It means that all and any purported State legislation would be without warrant of law.
20
21 It also means that all and any parliamentarian election in any State would have been without
22 warrant of law.
23
24 I indicated that the State of Victoria could always publish in the Victorian Gazette the original
25 state constitution, just that to do so you need public servants. And where all and any past
26 Appropriation Bills passed without the constitutionally being valid in law (Consider Albert Park
27 Act not having been gazetted and so all charges were defeated) then we do not have any validly
28 employed public servants or for that any Victorian Police. Oh boy, let sue the pant of them for
29 their violent conduct to enforce the unconstitutional mandate, when they were like terrorist
30 shooting rubber bullets upon parents holding children. And, as I did notify the Victorian Police
31 way back in 2020 that the MANDATES were unconstitutional then there can be no excuse they
32 didn’t know.
33 Arrest the lot of them who were involved in this terrorism upon Victorians and others.
34
35 And let not ignore either the unconstitutional usage of armed personnel at state borders, etc, to
36 deny Australians their freedom of travel. They too should be rounded up and arrested!
37
38 Ok, there might be a lawful manner to address issues regarding funding, but I am not now
39 exposing this!
40
41 Currently we do not have a legally valid Victorian Government and its purported legislation is
42 null and void (ULTRA VIRES).
43
44 Can we have a Premier who is not braindead, and one who actually can manage matters
45 within the provisions of the constitution and not despite of it?
46 You can download the document from:
47 https://www.scribd.com/document/718201594/202403029-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-
48 Jacinta-Allan-Premier
49
50 QUOTE 20240329-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Jacinta Allan Premier
51 Jacinta Allan, Premier (Australia, Victoria date) 29-3-2024
Page 22
1
2 Re: 20240329-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Jacinta Allan
4 COMPLAINT
5 Madam,
6 it is regrettable that we have “representatives” elected to a parliament who I view in
7 general either do not know the true meaning and application of the legal principles embedded in
8 the constitution or simply couldn’t care less about it.
9
10 It appears to me you do not have a clue what a government is about, and I will attempt to educate
11 you in this.
12
13 We often hear (first) Ministers (Premier/prime Ministers) claiming they are to govern for all
14 while in reality are simply pursuing their own political aspirations no matter how
15 unconstitutional it might be. Electoral commissions are much at fault because they allow
16 unconstitutionally politicians to claim that they should vote for them to be (first) Minister
17 (Premier/prime Minister) this even so electors cannot do so as in the Commonwealth the
18 Governor-General decide who he shall commission to be (prime) Minister regardless if the
19 person is or is not a Member of Parliament (subject to S64 of the constitution) and in a State the
20 Governor does so.
21 The Governor-General/Governor then also commission other persons to be Ministers each then
22 are responsible for the portfolios they have been commissio0ned for. No such thing as a (prime)
23 Minister/Premier to dictate a Minister what he/she can or cannot do regarding a portfolio. As for
24 a “cabinet” that is no more but a meeting between Ministers to discuss certain issues but no
25 “cabinet” has the power to overrule or otherwise interfere with the relevant Ministers decision
26 powers. A premier is the Minister for the Office of the premier and cabinet but cannot interfere
27 with the powers of the relevant Ministers regarding another portfolio.
28
29 In my view when you became Premier your first task was to ensure that all purported
30 unconstitutional legislation and enforcement was appropriately taken care off. However it
31 appears to me you lack the competence to be a Premier.
32 After all, as the Framers of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) within
33 which in Section 106 the States were created “subject to this constitution” made very clear that
34 Ministers are to be “constitutional advisers”. Meaning that any talking head being a Minister
35 should shut his trap and first show that he/she is a competent constitutional adviser and not some
36 braindead politician.
37
38 For example when you became Premier you should have immediately requested the State
39 Attorney-General to ensure that any litigation against electors for allegedly to vote is abandoned
40 as it violates their constitutional rights that they cannot be forced to vote in any political election.
41
42 Reportedly former Premier Daniel Andrews had 96 advisers and I understand many were being
43 paid about $1 million or even more, and yet he seems to make his own fantasy world decisions.
44 Waiting a lot of taxpayers monies in the process. Yet, since you became Premier it appears to me
45 little has changed. And do not think for a moment that I seek to pick out Labor as while I view
46 the same applies to Anthony Albanese “Travelling Pete”; the same applies to leaders of the
47 Opposition, Scott Morrison John Howard, etc. Actually we can go back to 1904 with the High
48 Court of Australia judges unconstitutionally prohibiting the usage of the Hansard Constitutional
49 Convention Debates and politicians then in power, regardless to which political party they were
50 associated with. It is because of the High Court of Australia prohibiting then the usage of the
51 Hansard that things went down the slope into the gutter.

Page 23
1 The Framers of the Constitution were well aware of this danger and for this specifically provided
2 that ordinary Australians could take on any unconstitutional legislation not having to depend
3 upon some Attorney-General accepting to do so. But when I write to basically tone deaf
4 politicians they generally ignore it when it doesn’t suit their goals.
5 I decided decades ago I would pursue matter my own way, using the constitution and so the \true
6 meaning and application of the legal principles embedded in the constitution, well aware this
7 could take decades to achieve to restore our constitutional system.
8
9 The issue is what is your position as a Premier in this all?
10 Councils were recognised by the Framers of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act
11 1900 (UK) to be “corporations” and in Sydney Municipal v Commonwealth 1904 the High
12 Court of Australia held that councils are a corporation and cannot legislate, however can exercise
13 “delegated” “State land taxation” where the State legislated for this. However, on 11 November
14 1910 the Commonwealth commenced to legislate as to land taxation and that means the States no
15 longer had “concurrent” legislative powers as to “land taxation” and by this neither could
16 councils then have any “delegated” land taxation powers referred to as “council rates”.
17 Because, albeit unconstitutional, the High Court of Australia denied litigants to rely upon the
18 Hansard records of the constitution convention Debates it resulted that not uncommon the High
19 Court of Australia handed down decisions that were in violation to the legal principles embedded
20 in the constitution. The States decided that the “concurrent” legislative powers somehow was
21 always applicable, at least so it appears to me, albeit this was wrong!
22
23
24
25 Meaning that the State of Victoria (and any other state for that) lacked legislative powers for
26 land taxation. This means that the State of Victoria couldn’t delegate land taxation to ‘councils”
27 where it had no legislative powers in the first place regarding land taxation. As the Framers of
28 the Constitution made very clear that any unconstitutional tax has to be refunded! Remember, the
29 States were created in Section 106 of this constitution “subject to this constitution”?
30
32 Convention)

Page 24
1 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the observations to which I
2 allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of misconception.
3 END QUOTE
4
5 Despite of that the Commonwealth on 11 November 1910 commenced to legislate as to “land
6 taxation” the State of Victoria then did albeit unconstitutionally the same subsequently on 26
7 December 1910.
8
9 Once I was sitting in the public gallery when the trial judge addressed me that he wanted me to
10 leave as I would use whatever he stated in that case in another case. My response was; “Not if
11 you do not use DOUBLE STANDARDS. This judge had past experiences where I had quoted
12 him in a later case, but he couldn’t force me to leave and I didn’t.
13 I know however that at least in my view far too often judges fails to act as to their oath of office
14 and will try to railroad a case on flimsy or non-existing grounds generally well aware that a party
15 may not be able to fend for himself/herself to pursue an expensive appeal.
16 So my strategy was to see if I could get some government authority to wrongly pursue me in
17 litigation and then so to say turn the tables on them. With voting I came to understand that one
18 couldn’t trust an electoral commission, which so to say was bending backwards to accommodate
19 political parties no matter how wrong in law or even unconstitutional. I therefore decided to in
20 my way to challenge the Australian Electoral Commission without letting them know I did so.
21 I was an INDEPENDENT candidate in 2001 in the federal election of Jagajaga may recall my
22 card:
23
24 Again:
25
26
27

Page 25
1 I had no doubt that the Australian Electoral Commission more than likely would charge me with
2 FAILING TO VOTE so that upon any conviction it then could pursue me for making false and
3 misleading statements that could have deceived electors, etc.
4 Well, the AEC in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka did precisely this to charge me with FAILING TO
5 VOTE. And Well I then filed a NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS (also served
6 upon all 9 Attorney-Generals) challenging various issues on constitutional grounds. Counsel for
7 the Commonwealth gave me the understanding that no one had ever before made those
8 challenged on constitutional grounds! The court or5dered the matter to be heard and determined
9 by the High Court of Australia, however now more than 21 years later since this 4 December
10 2002 order the High Court of Australia has not done so and I expect it never will because of the
11 implied bias of all judges to have to essentially declare themselves validly commissioned as
12 judges.
13 Still, the AEC charged me again in regard of the 2004 federal election for FAILING TO VOTE,
14 this even so I had already challenged the validity of the legislation and as such unless and until if
15 ever at all my original objection had been overruled (which till this day never has been) then the
16 legislation became ULTRA VIRES and still is so.
17 Then on 4 August 2005 the matter returned to the court and the magistrate then was faced that
18 Counsel for the Commonwealth submitting for “AVERMENT” I successfully opposed this also
19 referring to NSW Kable case. I understood that Counsel for the Commonwealth was making
20 false and misleading statements from the bar table, nevertheless he failed miserably.
21 When the matter then returned on 16 and 17 November 2005 it appeared that the magistrate
22 agreed that the 2001 federal election for the House of Representative was legally invalid, but
23 then the next day he somehow seemed to rule that he was not going to apply the previous orders
24 in my favour and simply convicted me on both charges. I successfully appealed this and did file
25 and serve a 409 pages written submission referred to as ADDRESS TO THE COURT and so
26 UNCHALLENGED by the Commonwealth and/or any or all of the 9 Attorney-Generals, even
27 so the issues that were stated in the NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS were also
28 before the Court during the appeals. When a party or parties do not challenge an opponent then
29 this implies it/they concede the truth thereof.
30
31 I decided to see if Artificial Intelligence (AI) would know about the successful appeals and well
32 the following responses were received:
33
34 QUOTE 20240326-Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006 succeeded in both appeals
35 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+in+
36 AEC+v+Schorel-Hlavka+I+on+19+July+2006+succeeded+in+both+appeals%3F
37 Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006 succeeded in both
38 appeals?
39
41 Yes, in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006, the defendant succeeded in both appeals.
431. Australian Electoral Commission (AEC)

442. Legal Database
Page 26
13. Court Records

3 5 results
4
5 Comments:High Court of Australia dismisses appeal against conviction ...
6 https//en.m.wikinews.org › wiki ›
7 Comments:High_Court_of_Australia_dismisses_appeal_against_conviction,_compulsory_vot
8 ing
10 The defendant claims that he has a right to disregard the will of the majority regarding
11 compulsory voting. I argue here that he does not. A holding to the ...
12
13 Submission-0506-Gerrit-Schorel-Hlavka.pdf
14 https//www.parliament.act.gov.au › __data › assets › pdf_file › 0009 › 1945197 › Submission-
15 0506-Gerrit-Schorel-Hlavka.pdf
17 On 19 July 2006 in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka County Court of Victoria, Case numbers
18 T01567737. 12. & Q10897630 (representing myself) I succeeded in ...
19
20 20190507-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To Australian Electoral ...
21 https//www.scribd.com › document › 409006849 › 20190507-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-
22 to-Australian-Electoral-Commission-Re-COMPLAINTS
24 20190507-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Australian Electoral Commission Re
25 COMPLAINTS - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) ...
26
27 ELECTORAL LITIGATION
28 https//www.aph.gov.au › parliamentary_business › committees ›
29 house_of_representatives_committees
31 Injunctions. Mr Ned Kelly's application on late candidate nomination. On 22 October. 2001,
32 Mr Ned Kelly, previously known as Mr Terry Sharples, filed an.
33
34 20200719-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To The Victorian Inspectorate ...
35 https//www.scribd.com › document › 469674114 › 20200719-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-
36 B-to-the-Victorian-Inspectorate-Reference-11722468
38 20200719-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to the Victorian Inspectorate-Reference #
39 11722468 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), ...
40 END QUOTE 20240326-Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006 succeeded in both
41 appeals
42
43 QUOTE 20240326-Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I sucessfully challenge the validity of the
44 Australian citizenship Act as being unconstitutional
45 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+in+
46 AEC+v+Schorel-
47 Hlavka+I+sucessfully+challenge+the+validity+of+the+Australian+citizenship+Act+as+being
48 +unconstitutional%3F
49 Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I sucessfully challenge the validity of the
50 Australian citizenship Act as being unconstitutional?
51
Page 27
2 Yes, in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I successfully challenged the validity of the Australian

3 Citizenship Act as being unconstitutional.
51. University of South Australia (Sue Milne)

62. High Court of Australia
73. Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth)
8 The information provided in the response is based on the analysis and insights from the
9 University of South Australia’s Sue Milne regarding constitutional challenges to the stripping
10 of Australian citizenship, the rulings and decisions made by the High Court of Australia in
11 cases such as Alexander v Minister for Home Affairs, Benbrika v Minister for Home Affairs,
12 and Jones v Commonwealth, as well as the provisions and amendments outlined in the
13 Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth).
15 5 results
16
17 Constitutional challenges to the stripping of Australian citizenship
18 https//globalcit.eu › constitutional-challenges-to-the-stripping-of-australian-citizenship-an-
19 update
20 Constitutional challenges to the stripping of Australian citizenship
21 In Alexander, the High Court held the revocation of citizenship for dis-allegiant conduct
22 (foreign incursions and recruitment) unconstitutional ...
23
25 https//www.scribd.com › document › 409006849 › 20190507-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-
26 to-Australian-Electoral-Commission-Re-COMPLAINTS
28 46 Electoral Act 1918 being unconstitutional. 47 48 The quotations are reproduced with any
29 typing error as was in the original documentation ...
30
31 Australian Citizenship Amendment (Citizenship Repudiation) Bill 2023
32 https//www.aph.gov.au › Parliamentary_Business › Bills_Legislation › bd › bd2324a › 24bd36
33 Australian Citizenship Amendment (Citizenship Repudiation) Bill 2023
34 Key points. The purpose of the Bill is to amend the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 to repeal
35 the current citizenship cessation provisions ...
36
37 Constitutional cases: October 2022
38 https//www.ags.gov.au › sites › default › files › 2022-10 ›
39 Constitutional%20cases%20_Oct%2022.pdf
Page 28
1 Constitutional cases: October 2022

2 Steward J dissenting) held that s 36B of the Australian Citizenship Act 2007 (Cth)
3 (Citizenship Act) is invalid because it infringes Ch III of the ...
4
5 Intelligence and Security Committee to review new citizenship ...
6 https//www.aph.gov.au › About_Parliament › House_of_Representatives ›
7 About_the_House_News › Media_Releases ›
8 Intelligence_and_Security_Committee_to_review_new_citizenship_repudiation_law
9 Intelligence and Security Committee to review new citizenship ...
10 The review provides the opportunity to examine the operation, effectiveness and implications
11 of the new citizenship repudiation regime, as well ...
12 END QUOTE 20240326-Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I sucessfully challenge the validity of
13 the Australian citizenship Act as being unconstitutional
14
15 QUOTE 20240325-0114-20240325-Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting
16 the Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed
17 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+Bar
18 ry+Collier+MP+Parliamentarian+Secretary+Assisting+the+Treasurer+NSW+on+2+March+2
19 011+claimed+%28to+me%29+that+the+States+had+legislative+powers+regarding+land+tax
20 ation+returned+to+them%3F+Do+you+accept+this+is+possible+when+the+constitution+doe
21 sn’t+provide+for+this+mechanism+to+return+exclusive+Commonwealth+power+back+to+th
22 e+States%3F
23
25 Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed (to me) that the States had legislative powers
26 regarding land taxation returned to them? Do you accept this is possible when the
27 constitution doesn’t provide for this mechanism to return exclusive Commonwealth
28 power back to the States?
29
31 Answer:
32 No, it is not possible for the States to have legislative powers regarding land taxation returned
33 to them if the Constitution does not provide for such a mechanism to transfer exclusive
34 Commonwealth power back to the States. The Australian Constitution clearly outlines the
35 division of powers between the Commonwealth and the States, and any changes or transfers
36 of powers would require formal amendments to the Constitution through specific processes
37 outlined in Section 128.
38 The Australian Constitution establishes a federal system of government where certain powers
39 are allocated exclusively to the Commonwealth Parliament under Section 51, including
40 taxation. Land taxation falls under this category of powers exclusively vested in the
41 Commonwealth. While there are provisions for concurrent powers and areas where both
42 levels of government can legislate, matters related to land taxation are generally within the
43 domain of the Commonwealth.
44 Any assertion that States could unilaterally reclaim legislative authority over land taxation
45 without a constitutional amendment would be legally unfounded and contrary to the
46 established framework of federalism in Australia. Therefore, unless there is a formal
47 amendment to the Constitution or a change in legislation at the federal level, States do not
48 have the authority to independently control land taxation.
49 In summary, based on the existing constitutional framework and principles of federalism in
50 Australia, it is not feasible for States to regain legislative powers over land taxation without
51 proper constitutional amendments or legal mechanisms.
Page 29
1 Australian Constitution
2 Legal Principles of Federalism in Australia
3 Division of Powers between Commonwealth and States
5 legislative powers in Australia’s federal system and how changes or transfers of such powers
6 would need to adhere to constitutional provisions.
8 5 results
9
13 He was a Labor Party member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly from 1999 to
14 2011 and from 2013 to 2015, representing the electorate of Miranda.
15
17 https//www.parliament.nsw.gov.au › la › department › Documents › department-of-the-
18 legislative-assembly-annual-report-for-2009-2010 ›
19 LA%20Annual%20Report%20200910.pdf
23
25 https//api.parliament.nsw.gov.au › api › hansard › search › daily › pdf › HANSARD-
26 1820781676-64586
30
32 https//www.aph.gov.au › parliamentary_business › committees ›
33 house_of_representatives_committees
37
41 House of Representatives Officeholders. Speaker—The Hon. David Peter Maxwell Hawker
42 MP. Deputy Speaker—The Hon. Ian Raymond Causley MP.
43 END QUOTE 20240325-0114-20240325-Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary
44 Assisting the Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed
45
46 It should be clear that AI agreed that the States since 11 November 1910 had no “concurrent”
47 legislative powers as to State land taxation and it would require a Section 128 referendum to
48 amend the constitution for the States to regain State land taxation legislative powers.
49 AI also agreed that I had succeeded in the appeals on numerous grounds, albeit it did not refer to
50 all issues then before the court.
51
Page 30
1 This means to me that “Council(s)” has/have no legal standing as to pursue any alleged
2 “delegated State land taxation referred to as “council rates”.
3 While in my view councils can legitimately charge for garbage collection, provided they actual
4 do so) but only as a corporation and not some purported “local government’.
5
6 Can a “council” claim to be a “local government”? Absolutely not, this as regardless what the
7 State Parliament may have legislated about it cannot override the constitution which created the
8 State within Section 106 “subject to this constitution”, and this constitution doesn’t provide for
9 a second level of “local government” which the state government itself already is.
10
11 The State government/councils, despite my past writings that “council rates” are unconstitutional
12 nevertheless failed to appropriately attend to this and this I view may constitute fraud by your
13 client to claim monies it knew or ought to have known it was not entitled upon as such, whereas
14 if it had claimed as a corporation for actual charges of collecting garbage, etc, it may have
15 avoided a lot of problems. But that is the direction your client choose to follow and well it must
16 then face the legal consequences for doing so.
17
18 This means that all and any Victoria State land tax legislation (so the alleged delegate State land
19 taxation referred to as “council rate”) are and remain to be unconstitutional!
20
21 Victoria embarked upon increasing this unconstitutional State land taxation selectively to certain
22 businesses and property owners seeming to try to get monies coming in after its reign of wasteful
23 spending that it still continues to do so, however this should be stopped.
24
25 Likewise, the so called unconstitutional covid laws must be abandoned. This as the States in the
26 first place had no legislative, executive and/or administrative powers as to the mandates.
27 Moreover it has no legislative, executive and/or administrative powers as to any man-kind
28 (infectious) diseases. I provided you extensive set out about this already in emails with their
29 attachments and so no need to repeat it all again.
30
31 With State land taxation and the alleged delegate powers being unconstitutional and to also the
32 Covid levy, etc, then obviously the State of Victoria has a considerable financial problem ahead.
33 I kept writing about this for decades but ignorance is no excuse and I am as the Framers of the
34 Constitution made very clear entitled to a refund of all unconstitutional taxation.
35
36 Can the Commonwealth step in?
37 The Commonwealth obviously can reinstate its exclusive “land taxation” but it can do so only in
38 a “UNIFORM” manner on a “SLIDING SCALE” and this means that all land taxation
39 throughout the Commonwealth must be equal! The alleged delegated land taxation referred to as
40 “council rates” never were “UNIFORM” throughout the Commonwealth and as such cannot be
41 deemed to have been Commonwealth delated powers either. Moreover, all taxation was to be
42 deposited in the Commonwealth Consolidated Revenue Funds and could only be drawn by
43 Appropriation Acts, and I understand councils never did so. The same with the State land
44 taxation claimed by the States.
45
46 The question may be asked if the Commonwealth could use its “corporation” powers to delegate
47 land taxation to “councils”? This is not possible because any legislation must be “UNIFORM”
48 and so all “corporations” not just councils could start collecting taxes. In a sense with the
49 unconstitutional GST they are essentially already doing so under the guise that it is a business
50 taxation and it is up to the businesses if the charge it to the end users, however this fallacy
51 doesn’t work out as such. Let me give an example:
Page 31
1 When about a truck load of boxes with their content was arriving from overseas then customs
2 informed me that I would have to pay GST charges regarding the content of the boxes. Oh boy,
3 did I teach them the true meaning and application of the legal principles embedded in the
4 constitution was all about that Customs responded they would release immediately everything
5 without any payment.
6 First of all I had with my order been charged GST (unconstitutionally that is) and the business
7 then decided to have items send to me from foreign countries. That was not my decision and
8 cannot then cause me to having to pay twice the unconstitutional GST.
9 Then the Federal government claims that GST is a business tax while I was not having any
10 orders placed as a business but as a private person and so for this (even if the GST was
11 constitutionally valid, something I do not concede to be so) then the GST would not have applied
12 to me. Yet, customs nevertheless is charging Australians this unconstitutional GST!
13
14 Then we have the issue of
15 https://www.ato.gov.au/law/view/view.htm?docid=EV/1051986927516&PiT=99991231235958
16 1051986927516 | Legal database - Australian Taxation Office
17 ... v Commissioner of Taxation [2008] FCA 1834 at [90] ... Melton Highway Pty Ltd
18 [2020] VSC 820at [58]-[70] ... | View related websites - ATO.gov.
19
20 Purportedly councils are not having to pay GST!
21
22 Let it be very clear that prior to federation “councils” were known as corporations” as the High
23 Court of Australia in Sydney Munnicipal v Commonwealth 1904 also underlined. It was then
24 about garbage collection, roads, etc. And as the Framers of the Constitution made clear that
25 when it came for example to “customs” the State of Victoria regarding railways sleepers couldn’t
26 be excluded from such charges. Then why would a council such as Buloke Shire Council be
27 excluded from Commonwealth taxation when the Framers of the Constitution made it very clear:
28
30 QUOTE
31 Mr. GLYNN: I think the last few words of this clause are too comprehensive in their
32 meaning. In South Australia there is a lot of land which is leased with the right of
33 purchase, and I can see that under the latter portion of this clause there is considerable
34 danger of defeating the effect of direct taxation.
35 Mr. O'CONNOR: In a case of that kind the reversion which is in the Crown would
36 not be taxed, but the letting value would be taxed.
37 Mr. BARTON: I might mention that the property of the Commonwealth in that land is
38 the reversion upon the lease. The reversion upon the lease would not be [start page 1002]
39 taxable, but the interest of the lessee in the property would be taxable.
40 Mr. GLYNN: I am only pointing out a difficulty that might arise.
41 Mr. HENRY: I would like to raise a question as to the right of the Commonwealth
42 to tax materials for State purposes. In the event of a colony importing rails,
43 machinery, engines, &c., for State purposes, I would like to know whether such
44 exports are to be free from Customs duties. Will the Federal Parliament have a right
45 to levy duties on materials imported for State purposes?
46 Mr. BARTON: This is a matter that was discussed very fully in the Constitutional
47 Committee, and I think my hon. friend Sir George Turner will remember that I consulted
48 the members of the Finance Committee upon it, intimating to them the opinion of the
49 Constitutional Committee on the point. The words:
50 Impose any tax on property
51 do not refer to the importation of goods at all, and any amendment to except the Customs
52 would be unnecessary. This clause states that a State shall not, without the consent of the
Page 32
1 Parliament of the Commonwealth, impose taxation on property of any kind belonging to

2 the Commonwealth, meaning by that property of any kind which is in hand, such as land
3 within the Commonwealth. That has no reference to Customs duties.
4 Sir GEORGE TURNER: Will articles imported by the States Governments come in
5 free?
6 Mr. BARTON: The question then arises whether articles imported by the States
7 Governments are to come in free, but this section has nothing to do with that. Under
8 this Bill and in the measure of 1891 I believe duties would have been collectable upon
9 imports by any State, and after the consultation which I had with the hon. member
10 and his colleagues on the Finance Committee the Constitutional Committee decided
11 not to make any exemption in the case of any State.
12 END QUOTE
13
14 Let it be very clear that prior to federation “councils” were known as corporations” as the High
15 Court of Australia in Sydney Munnicipal v Commonwealth 1904 also underlined. It was then
16 about garbage collection, roads, etc. And as the Framers of the Constitution made clear that
17 when it came for example to “customs” the State of Victoria regarding railways sleepers couldn’t
18 be excluded from such charges. Then why would a council such as Buloke Shire Council be
19 excluded from Commonwealth taxation when the Framers of the Constitution made it very clear:
20
21 Hansard 16-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
23 QUOTE Mr. ISAACS (Victoria).-
24 In the next sub-section it is provided that all taxation shall be uniform throughout the
25 Commonwealth. An income tax or a property tax raised under any federal law must
26 be uniform "throughout the Commonwealth." That is, in every part of the
27 Commonwealth.
28 END QUOTE
29 .
31 QUOTE
32 Mr. MCMILLAN: I think the reading of the sub-section is clear.
33 The reductions may be on a sliding scale, but they must always be uniform.
34 END QUOTE
35
36 This means that if the GST legislation is valid (something I do not concede to be so) then
37 councils must pay the same as anyone else despite
38
39 What we seem to have is so to say braindead people running amok when placed in a position of
40 power and surrounding themselves with numerous advisers which themselves neither have a clue
41 what is constitutionally permissible and let say that those advisers and their staff, etc, cost at
42 least a billion dollars a year then had the Victorian government just considered my writings,
43 which was notably provided free of charge, it not only could have saved itself at least a $1 billion
44 a year but also may have avoided the about $25 billon dollars now in debt, it more than likely
45 would have avoided numerous Victorian to be victim of the covid scam, and would also then
46 have avoided the ballooning of the health cost now incurring to care for the victims, well other
47 than those who were murdered in the process. In addition the numerous small business may
48 never have gone to the wall and may also have saved many marriages, etc.
49
51 Convention)
52 QUOTE Mr. BARTON (New South Wales).-

Page 33
1 I do not think the word quarantine, for instance, which is used in the sub-section of the 52nd
2 clause, is intended to give the Commonwealth power to legislate with regard to any
3 quarantine. That simply applies to quarantine as referring to diseases among man-kind.
4 END QUOTE
5
6 This is the part the High Court of Australia in Palmer v WA concealed from their judgment as
7 after all this in my view is how the High Court of Australia often has been operating to
8 undermine the true meaning and application of the constitution!
9
10 Still, I lodged a complaint on 8 April 2020 with the Victorian Ombudsman quoting this
11 particular part also, who then referred this to IBAC. Well IBAC made known on 19 April 2020
12 that it didn’t view it was a matter of “public interest”!
13 Well tell that to the victims of the covid scam! In my view their suffering could have been
14 avoided and so also the murder of the many in the process. And my 13 April 2020 complaint to
15 the Victorian Human Rights Commissioner never even had any response. And as I understand
16 from video recording then Premier Daniel Andrews made known that “human rights” was not
17 relevant to him. So, mass murder was the thing to pursue!
18 And, then Premier Daniel Andrews could neither bother to respond to my request of 8 August
19 2020 regarding the alleged covid virus!
20 It ought to be clear that this was a disaster in the making where we seemed to have braindead
21 politicians and advisers who simply couldn’t bother to consider my writings.
22 Well, the Framers of the Constitution made known that politicians serving in the Parliament
23 would be losing monies despite any allowance. To me that means they would be given an
24 allowance no more than the average weekly earnings. So, let’s strip the bloated payments of all
25 of them. Advisers that are braindead didn’t deserve and still do not deserve huge payments.
26
27 We had this North East Link and I did make my submission only to discover that before the
28 submissions were even considered somehow then Premier Daniel Andrews had made his
29 decision. Typical he couldn’t give a hood about what is best and proved this when spending
30 about $1.1 billion dollars on not building a freeway!
31
32 With the travel restriction in place this prevented me to get documents sworn and so I emails
33 them to the High Court of Australia explaining why they could not be sworn. Just that the
34 Registrar simply refused to file them. And my request for a judge to deal with this was ignored.
35 So, we now have that a registrar not being an OFFICER OF THE COURT nevertheless
36 determines the rights of a person!
37
38 I also filed a complaint with the Australian Federal Police that with numerous supplements was
39 more than 7,000 pages, quoting numerous scientist and medical experts, etc, but that too was
40 ignored.
41
42 This all however never deterred me to pursue JUSTIOCE because I had never any doubt that
43 soon or later legal accountability for the politicians and their collaborators to pursue this treason,
44 terrorism, etc, will come.
45
46 As I for decades made clear the States lost their “concurrent” legislative powers on any subject
47 matter the moment the Commonwealth commenced to legislate on a particular subject matter.
48 But again because the High Court of Australia albeit unconstitutionally banned the usage of the
49 Hansard it and others then flouted what was constitutionally appropriate and permissible.
50

Page 34
1 A clear example is the issue of “minimum wages” it never was within the ambit of the
2 Commonwealth, as I in the past extensively wrote about,
3
5 QUOTE
6 Mr. GORDON.- The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the Constitution
7 we will have to wipe it out."
8 END QUOTE
9
10 Here we had another idiot to pay out more than $800 million to the French for not building
11 submarines.
12
13 And I got Buloke Shire Council charging me $400 for NOT collecting any garbage.
14
15 And then we had the State of Victoria pursuing a so called 3.5 levy cap. On what, on an
16 unconstitutional “state land tax” that was claimed to be a delegated state land taxation as a
17 “council rate”?
18 The State of Victoria as with all States can register a business as a corporation, but it cannot
19 legislate as to the conduct of a “corporation” when the Commonwealth already does so.
20 For sure, the Framers of the Constitution intended that the Commonwealth would only deal with
21 corporations so they be “UNIFORM” in conduct throughout the Commonwealth of Australia,
22 but the braindead politicians do not grasp this.
23
24 I recall more than a decade ago how the Greens were up in the arms about something being build
25 (wind turbines) as it could kill a particular bird. Well, since then they seem to have changed the
26 basics of their religion to climate change, as there is more money to make with that and so0 now
27 tens of thousands of birds being killed somehow no longer is an issue.
28
29 Over the decades (due to one of my daughter’s first female cousin having married an Australian
30 of Aboriginal descent and they had 5 children) I held it important that my daughter would have
31 contact with Aboriginals who were living in Melbourne. Many Aboriginal Elders gave me the
32 understanding they never knew about how it was that certain Aboriginals had blond hair and
33 copper colored skin, etc. Well, in 1656 some 70 sailors on a Dutch ship ended up on the coast of
34 Western Australia (as it is now known) and well they and their Aboriginal partners ended up
35 having their offspring. The Dutch in 1626 named “New Holland” and in 1658 claimed “New
36 Holland” for the Dutch. As such Cap Cook never invaded “New Holland” to steal it from
37 Aboriginals as if he stole it from anyone it was from the Dutch, albeit never realising he did so.
38 As I understand it the Dutch never granted land rights and the Framers of the Constitution never
39 referred to “indigenous Aboriginals”, :” First nations”, “traditional custodians”, Traditions
40 custodians owners”, etc. There are all scam!
41 And the LGA (Local government Association” pushed for councils to recognise Aboriginals and
42 Torres Strait Islanders but why not the Dutch? After all the Dutch at least since 1656 lived in
43 “New Holland” whereas Torres Strait Islanders did not come into play until Queensland annexed
44 the Murray Islands in 1879! And the Framers of the Constitution made clear that Queensland had
45 to sort out Torres Strait Islanders land rights before federation. As such the constitution doesn’t
46 provide for “land rights”. But the judgment of the High Court of Australia in MAQBO
47 conveniently leaves out the Dutch history part with Australia. After all it would undermine their
48 claim that somehow Aboriginals had land rights entitlements.
49 Because of the Section 51(xxvi) referendum to include Aboriginals in this section, by this it
50 became ‘EXCLUSIVE” Commonwealth legislative powers but limited that it could not legislate
51 in favour of any race against the “general community”. As such the High Court of Australia

Page 35
1 again undermined the constitution by claiming that the (purported) Racial Discrimination Act
2 1975 was valid. This as you cannot have 2 opposing meanings in a constitution1
3
4 Then we have Linda Thorpe who is going on and on as if Aboriginals are peace loving people,
5 well consider that they (some tribes) were referred to also as “cannibals” then forget about peace
6 loving.
7
8 Here we have states including the State of Victoria pursuing this nonsense about “First nations”.
9 OK let me now quote something from “ABORIGINAL TRIBES OF AUSTRALIA Chapter
10 Four Physical Anthropology By NORMAN B. TINDALE 1974”.
11 QUOTE
12 The uncircumcised Balardong of the York district east of Perth nearly 1,000 miles (1,500
13 km.) to the south tell of cannibalism among the circumcised people to the east and of the
14 escape of an intended victim, after he had been circumcised and before he was eaten. Such
15 stories seem to indicate that the realities of physical and other differences across major
16 lines of physical and cultural break are long remembered. Among the Njamal such stories
17 are called manginju [‘nainju].
18 END QUOTE
19 And
20 QUOTE
21 They consider themselves to be tall but not to tall as the [‘thilparta] people. In my opinion,
22 using Birdsell’s classificatory terms, the Walmadjari have some links with the Murrayins,
23 the Kokatja are more Carpentarian, and the southern people are nearer to the blond-haired
24 type that Birdsell tentatively calls the Desert type of mixed Carpenmtariaqn origin.
25 The presence of blond hair among the children of the Desert peoples has not escaped the
26 notice of aborigines. They point out that the Indjiobandi of the Hamersley plateau in
27 Western Australia have many fair-haired children and that their skin color is light, or
28 “copper colored” as described by an aboriginal. They contrast the Indjibaqndi with the
29 Kariara and the other peoples along the northwest coast whose children’s hair is dark. In a
30 letter dated February 7, 1953, Father Worms mentioned that a Jawuru (his Jaoro) informant
31 had indicated that the Mangala people living to the east were people with “white hair,” in
32 contrast with their own locks which were darker. Father worms indicated that he had
33 himself noted that some children had dandy-colored hair among the Koktja (his Gogadja)
34 in the vicinity of Gregory Salt Sea.
35 END QUOTE
36 And
37 QUOTE
38 Stories of little people and the fears of meeting them when alone, also of ways to circumvent
39 their attentions by not looking directly at them, are widely current. Amongst the
40 Tanganekald there were stories of how the little people who lived in the rough scrub country
41 and known as tharkuni [0arkuni] were exterminated by being driven onto a point of land
42 jutting out into the sea and were turned into the penguins that lived along the southern
43 shores.
44 END QUOTE
45
46 If DNA test were to be done on whomever is deemed or self-identify with being Aboriginal then
47 one may find that many have Dutch DNA as I have.
48 This purported kind of Voice idiotic claims by State governments is and remains
49 unconstitutional.
50 Perhaps if the various governments had actually considered what I have been writing about over
51 the decades then we all would be better off and many Australians may not have become victims
52 let alone die as result of the elaborate covid scam!
Page 36
1
2 You cannot buy intelligence and this underlines why we ended up with many braindead
3 politicians, as they think that because they are the top of other braindead politicians they
4 somehow then are better than others.
5
6 Currently the State of Victoria is already reportedly heading to about $275 billion debt and more
7 to come and I view the politicians should about all be imprisoned and their estates confiscated as
8 to pay a bloke about $3090,000 a year pension for the rest of his life after having been such a
9 wrecking ball surely cannot be accepted? Let alone what I view his criminal conduct!
10 While politicians may just persist with the unconstitutional state land taxation, and other forms
11 of land taxation , to do so I view is a criminal offence because I made clear it is unconstitutional
12 and did not waiver in this when the AEC took me on and was defeated by me in both cases.
13
14 QUOTE County Court of Victoria, Case numbers T01567737 & Q10897630
15 In my view, a Court of law must at all times remain a Court of the people (Queens Court)
16 and cannot have a business registration as then it no longer is a Court of the people.
17 Neither do I accept that the Commonwealth of Australia has any constitutional powers to
18 force upon a State Court to become a registered business entity being it for taxation or
19 other purposes, as this interferes with the sovereign rights of the States to have their own
20 independent courts.
21
22 Therefore I view the judgement of the Magistrates Court of Victoria at Heidelberg to issue
23 orders of convictions is ULTRA VIRES, as it is done by a some kind of STAR
24 CHAMBER COURT type of Court that has a business interest and is no longer a Court
25 independent of any business interest.
26 END QUOTE County Court of Victoria, Case numbers T01567737 & Q10897630
27
28 The 2-1-1901 Victorian Letters Patent for the Governor was to provide an “impartial”
29 administration of justice. However, neither the Commonwealth nor any of the 9 Attorney-
30 General took me on this in my successful appeals!
31 Well it seems to me we do not have any. And there is so much more to state, but the above
32 should in itself indicate that doomsday is what we are heading for. However, the Premiers
33 conference provided a way out in that it was inserted that the Commo9nwealth could assist a
34 State, upon its own terms, and so effectively could bail out the State of Victoria and perhaps
35 appoint a\n ADMINISTRATOR to manage the State of Victoria, as after all we seem to have
36 governors who too in my view are braindead. After all they are the CEO of the State and yet
37 grossly mismanaged their obligations.
38
39 Let it be very clear that as I understand it the majority of Australians of Aboriginal descent are
40 living a life as other Australians and we should respect them for doing so. There also will always
41 be unfortunate people in any society that needs assistance and that is not I am against however to
42 spend about $39 billion a year on perhaps 1% of Aboriginals living in squalor, etc, where in the
43 end little or no monies end up with them underlines that politicians simply seem to be braindead
44 and cannot manage running a government.
45
46 Perhaps the so called quarantine centres might in the end become very functional by having most
47 politicians locked up in there and let them sit there awaiting trial for their involvement in the
48 mass murder and other harm inflicted upon the many with their elaborate covid scam. Don’t
49 bother about some simple apology, as it is too late for this and will not bring back those who
50 died and neither will, undo the suffering of other victims, nor reinstate the suffering of those who
51 had their businesses destroyed by this “covid scam”.
Page 37
1
2 END QUOTE 20240329-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Jacinta Allan Premier
3
4 Banyule City Council with its criminal conduct may do wiser to await the outcome of
5 Buloke Shire Council litigation.
6 You can download the document from:
8 Banyule-City-Council-Cr-Mayor-Tom-Melican-and-Ors
9 QUOTE 20240531-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Banyule City Council, Cr Mayor Tom Melican and
10 Ors
11 Banyule City Council & Mayor Cr Melican & Ors (Australia, Victoria date) 31-5-2024
13
14 Cc:
15 Cr Tom Melican Mayor [email protected] Cr Alison Champion [email protected]
16 Cr Fiona Mitsinikos [email protected] Cr Elizabeth Nealy [email protected]
17 Cr Mark Di Pasquate [email protected] Cr Alida McKern [email protected]
18 Cr Peter Dimarelos [email protected] Cr Rick Garotti [email protected]
19 Cr Peter Casteldo [email protected] Jan Richardson [email protected]
20 Janet Redgrave Team Leader Dev.Plan. [email protected] Mr RomanWojtkowski [email protected]
21
22 Re: 20240528-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Banyule City Council Mayor Cr Tom Melican and Ors
23
25 COMPLAINT
26 Sir & Ors,
27 further to my previous writings I will set out further issues.
28
29 Currently, Buloke Shire Council engaged a debt collection agency for its claims, which I rejected
30 on constitutional grounds, as to the alleged “council rates”. It also engaged a legal firm to litigate
31 against me regarding my country property. It for example charges me $400 for not collecting any
32 garbage, which I reject, and also for growth on my property, this even so I never planted any
33 such growth but is from council owned property across the road, etc.
34
35 Banyule City Council to most issues appears to be pursuing the same path, albeit it engaged itself
36 ongoing in criminal activities, and well Banyule City Council may elect to wait and see what
37 Buloke Shire Council may achieve against me just to avoid itself running up a legal bill.
38
39 Obviously, councils should be aware that as I on constitutional grounds challenged the alleged
40 “council rate” charges, etc., then were no court of competent jurisdiction be able to declare the
41 relevant legislation INTRA VIRES then all and any so called “state land taxation” and so the
42 purported “delegated” “council rates” then all and any such “council rates” would be remaining
43 unconstitutional as well as I view councillors can be charged for fraud where for a long time I
44 warned them about it and they ignored it all.
45
46 I was warned by various lawyers that I would have no hope in the world to defeat the AEC, and
47 yet I did twice! Lawyers simply are using blinkers failing to see the broader picture.
48
49 I understand that many property holders in the past challenged the validity of “council rates” but
50 they failed because they simply never so to say did their homework.
51
52 As I have formally challenged the constitutional validity of the purported “council rates” then
53 legally it is and remains ULTRA VIRES unless and until if ever at all a court of competent
54 jurisdiction were to declare it to be “INTRA VIRES”.
55
Page 38
1 Councils ought to keep in mind that they will be oblige to refund all and any unconstitutional
2 “state land taxation” delegated as “council rates” etc.
3
4 People often complain about possums, however to be honest, they are of great assistance to me.
5 They are having their droppings around the gate and inside the driveway and then when I come
6 out I can see if someone walked onto the droppings and so trespassed. Also, week after week we
7 have someone ringing the gate bell at precisely 23.58 (2 minutes before midnight) and that
8 obviously is not some postal delivery person at that time. Considering Banyule City Council
9 employees already being caught trespassing onto the property on many occasions then I am
10 reasonably assuming that Banyule City Council continues to do so, unlawfully!
11
12 Obviously, any council should prepare itself that now that lawyers and debt collectors are
13 involved and I repeated my constitutional based objections then technically no council can
14 charge//collect the so called “council rates” and have to consider how they are paying staff, etc,
15 as well as refund all unconstitutionally claimed council rates.
16 As I commenced my constitutional based objections against the unconstitutional so called
17 “council rates” councils therefore since then acted unlawful to nevertheless continue to charge
18 for “council rates”. While councillors were ignorant to my objections, they have to consider
19 ignorance is no excuse.
20 Engaging in LAWFARE against my wife and I certainly underline the need they need to be
21 dealt with harshly to be hold legally accountable.
22
23 QUOTE 20240531-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Midstate CreditCollect Pty Ltd
24 MIDSTATE CREDIT COLLECT PTY LTD 31-5-2024
25 Email: [email protected]
26
27 Cc: Buloke Shire Council & Ors [email protected]
28 Cr Alan Getley (Mayor) [email protected]
29 Cr David Pollard [email protected]
30 Cr Carolyn Stewart [email protected]
31 Cr Bernadette Hogan [email protected]
32 Cr Graeme Milne (Deputy Mayor) [email protected]
33 Cr Bronwyn Simpson [email protected]
34 Cr Daryl Warren [email protected]
35 Penelope Grant Revenue Officer [email protected]
36
37 RE: BULOKE SHIRE COUNCIL Amount: $931.60 Reference: 250200504
38 Property Address: 10 Anderson AVENUE Berriwillock VIC 3531
39
41 COMPLAINT
42 Sir/Madam & Ors,
43 further to my extensive previous writings to Buloke Shire Council I will set
44 out further issues, albeit this correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived that I
45 acknowledge and/or accept any legal status of MIDSTATE CREDIT COLLECT PTY LTD in
46 that regard this as I do not accept/agree there is any debt!
47
48 I in 2001 as an INDEPENDENT candidate for the federal seat of Jagajaga made clear that
49 “compulsory” part of voting was unconstitutional and also that state land taxation (so the
50 purported “council rates” was unconstitutional. The AEC in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka
51 subsequently charged me for FAILING TO VOTE in the 2001 federal election. I responded with
52 a NOTICE OF CONSTITUTIONAL MATTERS and served it also upon all 9 Attorney
53 Generals. The AEC then again charged me for FAILING TO VOTE in the 2004 federal election.
54 After various hearings (in which I all along represented my self) on 19 July 2006 I defeated both
Page 39
1 charges on constitutional and other legal grounds! Actually, neither the Commonwealth and/or
2 any of the Attorney Generals challenged any of my written submissions in a 409-pages
3 “ADDRESS TO THE COURT”.
4
5 20240325-07-1151
6 QUOTE Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006 succeeded in both appeals
7 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+in+AEC+v+Schore
8 l-Hlavka+I+on+19+July+2006+succeeded+in+both+appeals%3F
9 Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006 succeeded in both
10 appeals?
11
13 Yes, in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006, the defendant succeeded in both appeals.
15 1. Australian Electoral Commission (AEC)
16 2. Legal Database
17 3. Court Records
19 5 results
20
22 https//en.m.wikinews.org › wiki ›
23 Comments:High_Court_of_Australia_dismisses_appeal_against_conviction,_compulsory_voting
25 The defendant claims that he has a right to disregard the will of the majority regarding
26 compulsory voting. I argue here that he does not. A holding to the ...
27
29 https//www.parliament.act.gov.au › __data › assets › pdf_file › 0009 › 1945197 › Submission-0506-Gerrit-
30 Schorel-Hlavka.pdf
32 On 19 July 2006 in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka County Court of Victoria, Case numbers
33 T01567737. 12. & Q10897630 (representing myself) I succeeded in ...
34
36 https//www.scribd.com › document › 409006849 › 20190507-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-Australian-
37 Electoral-Commission-Re-COMPLAINTS
39 20190507-G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Australian Electoral Commission Re
40 COMPLAINTS - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), Text File (.txt) ...
41
45 Injunctions. Mr Ned Kelly's application on late candidate nomination. On 22 October.
46 2001, Mr Ned Kelly, previously known as Mr Terry Sharples, filed an.
47
49 https//www.scribd.com › document › 469674114 › 20200719-Mr-G-H-Schorel-Hlavka-O-W-B-to-the-
50 Victorian-Inspectorate-Reference-11722468
52 20200719-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to the Victorian Inspectorate-Reference #
53 11722468 - Free download as PDF File (.pdf), ...
54 END QUOTE Are you aware that in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I on 19 July 2006 succeeded in both appeals
55
Page 40
1 Buloke Shire Council has ignored for many years my objection to the unconstitutional
2 purported “state land taxation” “delegated” “council rates” and one has to ask why should a debt
3 collection agency get involved where Buloke Shire Council itself for all those years couldn’t
4 bother?
5
8 The record of these debates may fairly be expected to be widely read, and the observations to which I
9 allude might otherwise lead to a certain amount of misconception.
10 END QUOTE
11
12 Hansard 15-2-1898 Constitution Convention Debates (Official Record of the Debates of the National
14 QUOTE
15 Mr. HIGGINS.-Of course it is; but supposing the Ministry were to consent to a bonus or
16 bounty which interfered with freedom of trade, then the Federal High Court could be asked
17 to interfere, and it therefore has the ultimate decision of the matter. If the court decided
18 against a bonus or bounty, I rather think that the money would have to be refunded.
19 END QUOTE
20
21 I many decades ago decided to apply for a job at a factory for quality control. I had never worked
22 in such position before but as a Fitter & Turner held I could do the job. I didn’t know at that time
23 that the person interviewing me happen to be the Managing Director. I was asked why I didn’t
24 just go into the toolroom and earn more than being a quality control officer and my response was
25 that I didn’t want to be stuck for the rest of my life in a toolroom but contemplated to be in
26 management within a year. I was given the position and it didn’t take long for me to be so to say
27 a horror to machine operators. Not because I was doing anything wrong but because I just was
28 able to pin point what was wrong. For example, I attended to a machine and checked the screws
29 being manufactured and checking it against the order at the machine and also the drawings could
30 find nothing wrong. Still, I placed reject cards on the production as I had the guts feeling
31 something was wrong. I attended to the order section and requested the customers order, and it
32 turns out the customer had ordered a (in error) a different product. I made clear they better get a
33 deviation order from the customer to amend their original order. They did and I released then all
34 the pallets of products that I had placed on hold also. Actually, I was in management within a
35 year, due to all kinds of promotions!
36
37 The message is that everything might appear to be rights and most people will go along with it
38 but I just happen to be a person who was known to act on guts feeling and work from there.
39
40 I over the decades when researching constitutional issues of the Commonwealth of Australia
41 Constitution Act 1900 (UK) held it was rather strange that the Victorian Parliament was
42 purportedly legislating in violation of the federal constitution. And the more I was researching
43 the more I became aware that one had to go back to basis (like the example of incorrect customer
44 order) and it became very clear that our judicial system was hijacked by politicians and no longer
45 was an “impartial” administration of justice, as provided for in the Governor’s Letter Patent
46 published in the Gazette on 2 January 1901.
47
48 And as the Victorian colonial Constitution Act 1855 upon federation was amended by the
49 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) then for this amended Victorian state
50 Constitution Act 1855 subject to the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK),
51 to become valid it needed to be gazetted in the Victorian Gazette. I have so far not discovered
52 such publication in the Victorian Gazette!
53
Page 41
1 WATSON v_ LEE (1979) 144 CLR 374;( JUDGE3 STEPHEN J.)

2 QUOTE
3 As Scott L.J. said in Blackpool Corporation v. Locker (1948) 1 KB 349, at p
4 361 , speaking there of sub-delegated legislation, "there is one quite general
5 question . . . of supreme importance to the continuance of the rule of law
6 under the British constitution, namely, the right of the public affected to
7 know what that law is". The maxim that ignorance of the law is no excuse forms the
8 "working hypothesis on which the rule of law rests in British democracy" but to
9 operate it requires that "the whole of our law, written or unwritten, is accessible to
10 the public - in the sense, of course, that at any rate its legal advisers have access to it at
11 any moment, as of right".
12 END QUOTE
13 Again;
14 QUOTE
15 it requires that "the whole of our law, written or unwritten, is
16 accessible to the public - in the sense, of course,
17 END QUOTE
18
19 Since federation the State of Victoria continued to have the Victorian Parliament acting as a
20 “sovereign parliament” instead of it being a “constitutional parliament” and by this such
21 purported legislation lacked the warrant of law!
22
24 QUOTE
25 Dr. COCKBURN: All our experience hitherto has been under the condition of
26 parliamentary sovereignty. Parliament has been the supreme body. But when we embark
27 on federation we throw parliamentary sovereignty overboard. Parliament is no longer
28 supreme. Our parliaments at present are not only legislative, but constituent bodies. They
29 have not only the power of legislation, but the power of amending their constitutions. That
30 must disappear at once on the abolition of parliamentary sovereignty. No parliament
31 under a federation can be a constituent body; it will cease to have the power of
32 changing its constitution at its own will. Again, instead of parliament being supreme, the
33 parliaments of a federation are coordinate bodies-the main power is split up, instead of
34 being vested in one body. More than all that, there is this difference: When parliamentary
35 sovereignty is dispensed with, instead of there being a high court of parliament, you bring
36 into existence a powerful judiciary which towers above all powers, legislative and
37 executive, and which is the sole arbiter and interpreter of the constitution.
38 END QUOTE
39
40 Because of this omission the Victorian Parliament continued to legislate (albeit
41 unconstitutionally) as if it remained to be a “sovereign parliament” and also legislating in other
42 matters despite that without the Victorian state Constitution Act 1855 subject to the
43 Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) having been published as amended no
44 state legislation was valid. The only valid laws that remained effective were the old Victorian
45 colonial legislation that were not amended after federation and neither clashed with the
46 provisions of the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK).
47 While the states were provided by the Framers of the Constitution “concurrent’ legislative
48 powers until the Commonwealth legislated upon a certain subject matter it was provided with
49 legislative powers by the Commonwealth of Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK), the states
50 however needed to publish in the Gazette to have such “concurrent” legislative powers. The
51 failure to do so also means that citizens also wouldn’t have a clue what were and are the State’s
52 legislative powers.
Page 42
1
2 Upon federation the colonial governors Letters Patent were amended and on 2 January 1901 the
3 new Letters Patent were published in the Victoria Gazette, underlying that a change must be
4 published in the Gazette.
5
6 The Commonwealth on 11 November 1910 commenced with its Commonwealth land taxation
7 Act and from thereon the States no longer could legislate as to state land taxation such as the
8 alleged “delegated” state land taxation “council rates’.
9
10 37-0114 No 1
11 QUOTE Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW on 2
12 March 2011
13 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Are+you+aware+that+
14 Barry+Collier+MP+Parliamentarian+Secretary+Assisting+the+Treasurer+NSW+on+2+M
15 arch+2011+claimed+%28to+me%29+that+the+States+had+legislative+powers+regarding
16 +land+taxation+returned+to+them%3F+Do+you+accept+this+is+possible+when+the+con
17 stitution+doesn’t+provide+for+this+mechanism+to+return+exclusive+Commonwealth+po
18 wer+back+to+the+States%3F
20 Treasurer NSW on 2 March 2011 claimed (to me) that the States had legislative
21 powers regarding land taxation returned to them? Do you accept this is possible when
22 the constitution doesn’t provide for this mechanism to return exclusive
23 Commonwealth power back to the States?
24
26 Answer:
27 No, it is not possible for the States to have legislative powers regarding land taxation
28 returned to them if the Constitution does not provide for such a mechanism to
29 transfer exclusive Commonwealth power back to the States. The Australian
30 Constitution clearly outlines the division of powers between the Commonwealth and
31 the States, and any changes or transfers of powers would require formal amendments
32 to the Constitution through specific processes outlined in Section 128.
33 The Australian Constitution establishes a federal system of government where certain
34 powers are allocated exclusively to the Commonwealth Parliament under Section 51,
35 including taxation. Land taxation falls under this category of powers exclusively
36 vested in the Commonwealth. While there are provisions for concurrent powers and
37 areas where both levels of government can legislate, matters related to land taxation
38 are generally within the domain of the Commonwealth.
39 Any assertion that States could unilaterally reclaim legislative authority over land
40 taxation without a constitutional amendment would be legally unfounded and
41 contrary to the established framework of federalism in Australia. Therefore, unless
42 there is a formal amendment to the Constitution or a change in legislation at the
43 federal level, States do not have the authority to independently control land taxation.
44 In summary, based on the existing constitutional framework and principles of
45 federalism in Australia, it is not feasible for States to regain legislative powers over
46 land taxation without proper constitutional amendments or legal mechanisms.
48 4. Australian Constitution
49 5. Legal Principles of Federalism in Australia
50 6. Division of Powers between Commonwealth and States

Page 43

2 legislative powers in Australia’s federal system and how changes or transfers of such
3 powers would need to adhere to constitutional provisions.
5 5 results
6
10 He was a Labor Party member of the New South Wales Legislative Assembly from 1999
11 to 2011 and from 2013 to 2015, representing the electorate of Miranda.
12
14 https//www.parliament.nsw.gov.au › la › department › Documents › department-of-the-legislative-assembly-
15 annual-report-for-2009-2010 › LA%20Annual%20Report%20200910.pdf
19
21 https//api.parliament.nsw.gov.au › api › hansard › search › daily › pdf › HANSARD-1820781676-64586
25
31
35 House of Representatives Officeholders. Speaker—The Hon. David Peter Maxwell
36 Hawker MP. Deputy Speaker—The Hon. Ian Raymond Causley MP.
37 END QUOTE Are you aware that Barry Collier MP Parliamentarian Secretary Assisting the Treasurer NSW
38 on 2 March 2011
39
40 I understand that councils employ debt collectors but reality is that there is no debt and the mere
41 fact some council may claim there is a debt doesn’t make it to be a debt. In my view any debt
42 collector agency that is made aware of this issue and nevertheless pursues an alleged debt may
43 possibly be subjected to misprision or such similar offences.
44
45 In my view a debt collection agency should first of all request the council claiming there is a
46 debt on what legal basis are you claiming there is a debt and what did the person against whom
47 you claim the debt state in response?
48 A debt collector has no greater standing in law then the entity it represents. Meaning, that if a
49 council claims a debt this claim is denied then the onus is upon the council to prove its claim to
50 be valid in law and not merely leave some debt collection agency to fighting litigation to try to
51 get some court order.
52 Litigation in the courts must always be the last resort, and yet councils generally will blatantly
53 disregard any form of communication but merely seek to rely upon some debt collector agency
54 to succeed in court, avoiding any real communication to deal with the relevant issues in dispute.

Page 44
1 Councils may claim any legal authority but reality is as set out above, if the State of Victoria
2 failed to publish in the Gazette relevant acts, etc, then it never invoked those purported Acts,
3 including any constitution act.
4 There can be absolutely no question that for numerous years I did make known to the State
5 government and councils about the lack of legislative powers (consider also The Municipality of
6 Sydney v Commonwealth 1904) that made it very clear that municipal councils do NOT have
7 legislative powers and can only apply State legislation. Where then the State lacks itself certain
8 legislative powers such as state land taxation since 11 November 1910 then the State neither can
9 delegate such land taxation as a purported “delegated” “council rates”.
10 Neither can the state delegate any other powers where it failed to publish in the gazette the
11 original State Constitution Act 1855 and any further implications governing the Commonwealth
12 legislation ending the States “concurrent” legislative powers.
13
14 Before anyone desires to litigate against me on any subject matter this person/entity better sort
15 out the issue of what, if any, legislation is legally valid.
16 I actually do not need to prove any legislation to be invalid in law, as it is upon the other party to
17 prove any legislation it relies upon is constitutionally and/or otherwise legally valid.
18
19 Let us be very clear about it, a court of competent jurisdiction faced with an OBJECTION TO
20 JURISDICTION would have no alternative but to schedule for a “jurisdictional hearing” and
21 then Buloke Shire Council or any of its claimed agents acting for and on behalf of Buloke
22 Shire Council would have to prove jurisdiction! One also has to question why has the State of
23 Victoria not addressed this issue despite my extensive writings about this. After all, if Buloke
24 Shire Council is claiming to seek to enforce State laws and I have for numerous years patiently
25 challenged this then the State could have simply responded long ago to explain its position.
26 Ignoring to do so doesn’t validate any challenged legislation!
27 .
29 QUOTE
30 Mr. GORDON.-Well, I think not. I am sure that if the honorable member applies his
31 mind to the subject he will see it is not abstruse. If a statute of either the Federal or the
32 states Parliament be taken into court the court is bound to give an interpretation according
33 to the strict hyper-refinements of the law. It may be a good law passed by "the sovereign
34 will of the people," although that latter phrase is a common one which I do not care much
35 about. The court may say-"It is a good law, but as it technically infringes on the
36 Constitution we will have to wipe it out." As I have said, the proposal I support retains
37 some remnant of parliamentary sovereignty, leaving it to the will of Parliament on either
38 side to attack each other's laws.
39 END QUOTE
40
42 QUOTE
43 Mr. ISAACS.-No. If it is ultra vires of the Constitution it would, of course, be invalid.
44 END QUOTE
45 END QUOTE 20240531-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Midstate CreditCollect Pty Ltd
46 END QUOTE 20240531-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Banyule City Council, Cr Mayor Tom Melican
47 and Ors
48
49 https://kirschsubstack.com/p/doctors-fareed-and-tyson-have-collectively?utm_source=post-email-
50 title&publication_id=548354&post_id=145055453&utm_campaign=email-post-
51 title&isFreemail=true&r=1a0316&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
52 Doctors Fareed and Tyson have collectively treated 20,000 COVID cases with no
53 deaths. Do you know why it's not in the peer-reviewed literature?
54
Page 45
1
2 https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/ivermectins-mechanism-of-action-against
3 Ivermectin's Mechanism of Action Against SARS-CoV-2 Described
4 SHAME on the hospital systems that systematically denied patients (and their begging
5 families) this FDA-approved, Nobel prize winning, wonder drug.
6
7 https://www.zerohedge.com/markets/trust-sciencethat-just-retracted-11000-peer-reviewed-
8 papers?utm_source=daily_newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=2741
9 Trust The "Science"...That Just Retracted 11,000 "Peer Reviewed" Papers
10 QUOTE
11 BY TYLER DURDEN
12 TUESDAY, MAY 28, 2024 - 07:45 AM
13 It's yet another reminder of why blindly 'trusting the science' may not always be the best
14 go-to move in the future.
15 217 year old Wiley science publisher has reportedly "peer reviewed" more than 11,000
16 papers that were determined to be fake without ever noticing. The papers were referred to
17 as "naked gobbledygook sandwiches", Australian blogger Jo Nova wrote on her blog last
18 week.
19 "It’s not just a scam, it’s an industry," she said. "Who knew, academic journals were
20 a $30 billion dollar industry?"
21 END QUOTE
22
23 Let it be very clear, it was the refusal to enforce the true meaning and application of the legal
24 principles embedded in the constitution that first of all was a basic underlying problem. Judges
25 simply accepted that doctors were claiming such as in Palmer v WA rather then to demand they
26 prove such alleged covid-19 virus actually existed! Had the court demanded proper scientific
27 details then it would have been discovered that this claimed “covid-19” virus was one elaborate
28 scam!
29 The WHO Director-General a veterinarian NOT QUALIFIED to be a medical practitioner (for
30 humans) and directed there was no need to isolate and purify the alleged covid-19 virus.
31 Yet, he did declare a “pandemic” without a shred of evidence that this alleged ‘covid-19
32 virus’ actually existed! And the medical profession and politicians and their collaborators were
33 going along with this, being it for lust of power and/or monies, etc.
34
35
Page 46
1
2 As was exposed, Pfizer was flying in so called ‘covid-19 vaccinations’ for its own staff, about
3 1,500 of them and where was the TGA approval that those jabs were safe? And why at all fly in
4 special vials unless Pfizer knew that the once the Federal Government paid for were
5 contaminated and about 28% of them had deadly items in them.
6 One has to be an utter fool to accept that the 1,500 jabs somehow would have made a dint in the
7 millions of vials that the Federal Government had ordered!
8 And why did the Federal Government order them in the first place when it were the States that
9 MANDATED the jabs, albeit unconstitutionally?
10
11 As to “This is the first pandemic caused by a coronavirus.” didn’t they claim in 2002 there was a
12 coronavirus?
13
14 What appears to have been the case is as I exposed in the past that they even intended to claim
15 hay fever was a coronavirus issue so it would give a better return for the investors.
16 Yes, that was what the scam was all about! And we had in my view grossly incompetent law
17 enforcement officers who went along with the scam rather than to investigate matters.
18
19 https://www.who.int/director-general/speeches/detail/who-director-general-s-opening-remarks-at-the-media-
20 briefing-on-covid-19---11-march-2020
21 WHO Director-General's opening remarks at the media briefing on ...
22 11 Mar 2020 ... I have said from the beginning that countries must take a whole-of-government, whole-of-
23 society approach, built around a comprehensive strategy ...
24 QUOTE
25 WHO has been assessing this outbreak around the clock and we are deeply concerned both
26 by the alarming levels of spread and severity, and by the alarming levels of inaction.
27 We have therefore made the assessment that COVID-19 can be characterized as a
28 pandemic.
29 Pandemic is not a word to use lightly or carelessly. It is a word that, if misused, can cause
30 unreasonable fear, or unjustified acceptance that the fight is over, leading to unnecessary
31 suffering and death.
32 Describing the situation as a pandemic does not change WHO’s assessment of the threat
33 posed by this virus. It doesn’t change what WHO is doing, and it doesn’t change what
34 countries should do.
35 We have never before seen a pandemic sparked by a coronavirus. This is the first pandemic
36 caused by a coronavirus.
37 And we have never before seen a pandemic that can be controlled, at the same time.
38 WHO has been in full response mode since we were notified of the first cases.
39 And we have called every day for countries to take urgent and aggressive action.
40 We have rung the alarm bell loud and clear.
41 END QUOTE
42
43 https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/testing-tracing-backbone-who-coronavirus-
44 wednesdays-briefing/
45 WHO coronavirus briefing: Isolation, testing and tracing comprise the ...
46 18 Mar 2020 ... "Don't assume you won't have transmission." As the Director-
47 General explained, the virus can accelerate after a tipping point. If you have no ...
48
49 Let us not think this is the first time such kind of incident eventuated where the medical
50 profession lied and lied to patients and ended up killing thousands of them in addition to
51 numerous other victims. This underlines that one so to say in general one can trust a used car
52 salesman more now than a medical doctor, scientist or politician!
Page 47
1
2 The following link relates to a blood contamination that resulted in many thousands of deaths in
3 the UK and the medical profession and various governments covered this up! One obviously
4 have to ask how many likewise in Australia were harmed but it too was concealed?
5
6 https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/infected-blood-inquiry-response-expert-group-
7 summary-report
8 QUOTE
9 Policy paper
10 Infected Blood Inquiry Response Expert Group Summary Report
11 This Report was produced by the Infected Blood Inquiry Response Expert Group to advise
12 on design of a new Infected Blood Compensation Scheme.
13 END QUOTE
14
15 https://bdr.soundestlink.com/ce/c/64e46a7c187c178b19a2c495/66585c90cec05761c9c9f1ff/6
16 65890f8d7af6b2b1026268b?signature=b01d15804f3bf0835b27e32cddbc531d4582b4fc823f4
17 259e8c123ade2ede09d
18 Top Japanese Scientists DEMAND Withdrawal of COVID Shots
19
20 https://newsaddicts.com/misinformation-surrounding-fdas-communication-on-ivermectin-
21 and-cdcs-handling-of-vaccine-myocarditis-along-with-other-
22 findings/?utm_source=mailpoet&utm_medium=email&utm_source_platform=mailpoet&u
23 tm_campaign=newsletter
24 Misinformation Surrounding FDA’s Communication on Ivermectin and CDC’s
25 Handling of Vaccine Myocarditis, Along with Other Findings
26
27 20240512-(13) Pelham on X_ _BOMBSHELL_ Pfizer employees were given a _special
28 batch_… different from what was forced into the general population
29 https___t.co_CDww6wxFif_ _ X_files
30
31 20240513-German Government Admits There Was No Pandemic - Global
32 ResearchGlobal Research - Centre for Research on Globalization_files
33
34 https://childrenshealthdefense.org/defender/truth-about-covid-vaccines-cancer-flccc-mainstream-
35 media/?utm_source=luminate&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=defender&utm_id=20240430
36 04/ 30/ 24
37 Is the Public Ready for the Truth About COVID Vaccines?
38 RealClear Health this month published an op-ed by Dr. Pierre Kory, president and chief
39 medical officer of the Front Line COVID-19 Critical Care Alliance, and journalist Mary Beth
40 Pfeiffer that raised questions about COVID-19 vaccines and rising cancer rates. Is it a sign
41 that mainstream media is finally ready to allow debate on the vaccines?
42
43 https://www.abc.net.au/news/2024-05-01/vic-covid-hotel-quarantine-charges-worksafe-dropped/103789052
44 Bid to prosecute Victorian government over COVID-19 hotel quarantine collapses in court
45 QUOTE
46 "The Court's ruling was that these witnesses provided statements to the Inquiry on
47 the Department's behalf," the OPP spokesperson said.
48 END QUOTE
49 And
50 QUOTE
51 Victoria's second wave of COVID-19 infections in 2020 killed hundreds of people and
52 was traced back to leaks from the government's hotel quarantine program.
Page 48
1 Opposition Leader John Pesutto said the magnitude of the failings in the quarantine
2 program should result in prosecution.
3 "I think this will be deeply disappointing for Victorians," he said.
4 "What Victorians want is somebody fairly and reasonable to be held responsible.
5 "Somebody has to be held accountable somewhere and it just seems with this
6 government no one is held accountable for anything."
7 END QUOTE
8
9 https://www.globalresearch.ca/japan-most-senior-cancer-doctor-covid-shots-
10 murder/5858153
11 Japan’s Most Senior Cancer Doctor: COVID Shots Are ‘Essentially Murder’
12 Dr. Masanori Fukushima has called on the World Health Organization to lead an
13 investigation of the harmful outcomes of the COVID shots.
14
15 Remember the Pfizer 95% effective, actually I understand it even claimed at one stage to be
16 100% effective? Well, the following may just explain the absurdity and deception with the claim.
17
18
19 Yes, this statement by Doug Little was the mantra from the pharmaceutical companies and
20 governments around the world then obeyed to follow this to mandate the poisonous life-
21 threatening jabs!
22
23 As I openly opposed this kind of TERORISM I seem to have been targeted where I view the
24 Commonwealth the State of Victoria and Banyule City Council acted against my wife and I.
25 Because Banyule City Council committed crimes such as trespassing, vandalising my wife’s
26 lawfully parked motor vehicle, causing property damage, etc, but also on 29 November 2023
27 scaring the living daylights out of my wife that she ended up losing her ability to balance and
28 now is having to use a wheelchair then I view this is assault causing bodily harm upon my wife
29 Olga!
30
31 I never had any doubt that we seem to have mainly traitors in the various governments aided by
32 the terrorist portraying to be law enforcement officers while in real pushing their masters’
33 unconstitutional MANDATES.
34
Page 49
1 I cannot reverse the harm that was inflicted upon my son Mark and my wife but I can pursue to
2 hold them all legally accountable. Unlike most other people I have an extensive written record to
3 show I made known the harmful issues and it was disregarded.
4 Actually, the AFP also should investigate the so-called childhood vaccinations as that to appears
5 to me from the articles I read and the videos I watched being an elaborate scam. While the AFP
6 may argue that are state issues, actually they are not completely, this because the States lack any
7 legislative, executive and administrative powers to mandate any vaccinations regarding “man-
8 kind” infectious diseases!
9 The harm to children has increased dramatically as the childhood vaccination increased without
10 any concern about proper clinical trials to ensure the vaccines are safe. I now have 3
11 grandchildren suffering from AUTISM and well I will pursue that also. How on earth the
12 Victorian Government could have engaged a non-medical doctor to be a Chief Health Officer
13 who then dictate medical issues, without any blood test either, is beyond me.
14
15 https://forbiddennews.substack.com/p/cia-agent-we-designed-mrna-to-kill?utm_source=post-
16 email-title&publication_id=1658626&post_id=145217620&utm_campaign=email-post-
17 title&isFreemail=true&r=1a0316&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
18 CIA Agent: "We Designed mRNA to Kill"
19 Forbidden.News from ForbiddenNews Substack
21 To:[email protected]
22 Sun, 2 June at 10:03 pm
23 QUOTE
24 CIA Agent: "We Designed mRNA to Kill"
25 BY THE PEOPLE'S VOICE
26
27 TRANSCRIPT
28 The CIA invented mRNA technology, in conjunction with the Bill and Melinda Gates
29 Foundation, the World Economic Forum, and the Rockefeller Foundation, according to
30 bombshell testimony of a CIA agent who admits that COVID vaccines were
31 developed as a bioweapon to control humanity.
32 According to the agent and leaked top-secret documents, the COVID pandemic was a
33 psyop, run by the CIA to frogmarch humanity towards a total surveillance state.
34 And COVID mRNA vaccines were not developed during Operation Warp Speed, but
35 were ready and waiting for deployment for at least 10 years prior to the pandemic!
36 These revelations are all backed-up by fully verifiable documents and sources, and they
37 will spell doom for the elite if we spread this information to enough people.
38 Three years ago, Klaus Schwab openly bragged that the World Economic Forum and their
39 globalist stakeholders were on track to have total control over the human race by the year
40 2030.
41 How wrong he was. Unfortunately for the globalist elite, their authoritarian vision of
42 microchips, open-air prisons, CBDCs and mandatory vaccination is receding faster than
43 Yuval Noah Harari's hairline!
44 END QUOTE
45 And
46 QUOTE
47 [Video of Congressional testimony of Michael Shellenberger before Sen Josh Hawley].
48 Josh Hawley: The allegations stem from a whistleblower who has come forward to
49 the House, a whistleblower from the Central Intelligence Agency. I have the letter, the
50 relevant letter here from the House Oversight Committee. The whistleblower alleges
51 that a CIA team was paid to change its assessment of the origins of COVID-19.
52 Do I have that broadly correct? Is that your understanding of the report?
Page 50
1 Michael Shellenberger: And just on the very specific point of we were the first to
2 identify the three people that contracted the coronavirus in China. They were the
3 people working on gain-of-function research in the Wuhan Institute of Virology. The
4 Wall Street Journal confirmed our reporting two weeks later.
5 END QUOTE
6
7 While I received the email on 2 June 2024 I since 2020 have been writing about this because of
8 the extensive research I was and still am doing.
9 Obviously, one need to question how many Australians could have avoided being harmed and
10 even killed had the Australian Federal Police done its job? Are those in the Australian Federal
11 Police blatantly ignorant to the harm that might not only have been inflicted upon themselves but
12 also members of their family with all those unconstitutional jabs? Have the so to say sold their
13 soul just for 12 silver coins?
14 The Australian Federal Police must be held legally accountable for failing to do its job despite
15 my original complaint and numerous supplements.
16
17 Scott Morrison requested the Australian Federal Police to investigate regarding COVID
18 issues, and well, let the AFP do its job and do a proper investigation as I now have
19 requested in this COMPLAINT.
20 This document can be downloaded from:
22 Reece-Kershaw-Chief-Commissioner-of-the-Australian-Federal-Police-COMPLAINT-2
23 QUOTE 20210806-Notes-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the
24 Australian Federal Police
25 Reece Kershaw 6-8-2021
26 Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
27 Forwarded via email
28
29 Cc: [email protected]
30 Advisory Committee on Vaccines, Therapeutic Goods Administration
31 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606
32 Attn: Pharmacovigilance and Special Access Branch, MDP 122
33
35 Committee Support Unit, Therapeutic Goods Administration
36 PO Box 100, WODEN ACT 2606
37 Attn: Scheduling & Committee Support Section, MDP 122
38
39 Mr Daniel Andrews Premier
41
42 Mr Martin Pakula, [email protected], [email protected]
43
44 Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
45
46
47 20210806-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of the Australian Federal Police
48 COMPLAINT
49 Sir,
50 I understand from news report that a special AFP team has been appointed regarding online
51 publications relating to the COVID-19 issue. I view therefore that it is within the AFP
52 investigative powers to investigate all relevant issues and not just those which the Government
53 may desire to be investigating to perhaps aids in its overthrow of the Commonwealth of
54 Australia Constitution Act 1900 (UK) and so the provisions therein.
55
Page 51
1 https://www.9news.com.au/national/coronavirus-anti-vaxxers-targeted-special-team-detectives-fears-could-target-
2 vaccine-hubs/fad28908-9340-4d0e-80f7-f5e21d61f0e7
3 Coronavirus: Anti vaxxers targeted by special team of detectives amid fears they could target
4 vaccine hubs (9news.com.au)
5 Fears vaccine hubs could be 'targeted' as online chatter spikes
6 QUOTE
7 A special team of AFP detectives has been appointed by the Federal Government to
8 watch the online interactions of the anti-vaccination "movement".
9 END QUOTE
10
11 My concern is also that the Federal Government is aiding and abetting with the States as to
12 succeed in this to install a NEW WORLD ORDER, violating our constitutional rights, by
13 providing funding for the unconstitutional lockdowns or any state/territory.
14 END QUOTE 20210806-Notes-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. to Reece Kershaw Chief Commissioner of
15 the Australian Federal Police
16
17 Video: “Freddie Sayers on the 'disinformation movement'” UnHerd
18 QUOTE
19
20
21
22
23
24

Page 52
1 The Commonwealth of Australia is not at all pursuing truth telling not just in Aboriginal issues
2 because Governor-General designated herself is falsely claiming about a “bloody invasion” by
3 the British which even (Artificial Intelligence) denied to have occurred:
4
5 40-0121
6 QUOTE Do you accept that Cap Cook did not invade "New Holland" as it was already claimed by the Dutch?
7 https://iask.ai/?mode=question&options[detail_level]=detailed&q=Do+you+accept+that+Cap+C
8 ook+did+not+invade+"New+Holland"+as+it+was+already+claimed+by+the+Dutch%3F
9 Do you accept that Cap Cook did not invade "New Holland" as it was already claimed by
10 the Dutch?
11
13 Answer:
14 No, Captain Cook did not invade “New Holland” as it was already claimed by the Dutch.
15 END QUOTE Do you accept that Cap Cook did not invade "New Holland" as it was already claimed by the Dutch?
16
17 Likewise, the Commonwealth disinformation about the safety of the FAKE covid-19 vaccines
18 underlines it is in no position to be trust worthy as to what is mis/disinformation.
19 As I pointed out long ago in my Supplements that the handling of the bioweapon jabs I view was
20 unlawful and yet I am not aware a single person was ever charged for these violation of law!
21
22 Since the proposal of a Voice referendum (now defeated), I discovered that Scribd was shadow
23 banning me. That to me was also unconstitutional, this as it interfered with my “political
24 liberty” and “religious liberty”. Afterall, when a Big Tech company operates within the
25 Commonwealth of Australia it must operate within the true meaning and application of the legal
26 principles embedded in the constitution and cannot set conditions, etc, to serve a government in
27 violation of constitutional rights. In my view the media (MSM)/Big Tech that concealed relevant
28 details/information by this preventing Australians to be aware of certain dangers and/or
29 promoted the FAKE covid-19 vaccines must be held legally accountable for having been
30 accessories to the unconstitutional and/or unlawful promotion, etc, of the dangerous purported
31 covid-19 vaccines.
32
33 To be continued with supplement part 110B.
34
35
36
37 We need to return to the organics and legal principles embed in of our federal constitution!
38
39 This correspondence is not intended and neither must be perceived to state all issues/details.
40 Awaiting your response, G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. (Gerrit)
41 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

42 (Our name is our motto!)

20240603-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 110A-Deadly Pursuit & Arrest, Etc

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

20240603-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 110A-Deadly Pursuit & Arrest, Etc

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

20240603-Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B. To R Kershaw Chief Commissioner of AFP-Suppl 110A-Deadly Pursuit & Arrest, Etc

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Page 1

3-6-2024 Page 3 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Mr. ISAACS.-Yes; but not as an annual service.

3-6-2024 Page 6 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 Labor’s new National Urban Policy is

3-6-2024 Page 9 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 the constitution doesn’t provide for this mechanism to return exclusive

1 https//api.parliament.nsw.gov.au › api › hansard › search › daily › pdf › HANSARD-1820781676-64586

3-6-2024 Page 13 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-6-2024 Page 14 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-6-2024 Page 15 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-6-2024 Page 16 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 robbery, wounding, malicious wounding with intent, affray

1 95 KB (10,058 words) - 07:00, 27 May 2024

3-6-2024 Page 22 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-6-2024 Page 23 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-6-2024 Page 24 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

42 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:

431. Australian Electoral Commission (AEC)

13. Court Records

1 According to www.iAsk.ai Ask Ai Questions Search Engine:

2 Yes, in AEC v Schorel-Hlavka I successfully challenged the validity of the Australian

4 Top 3 Authoritative Sources Used in Answering this Question:

51. University of South Australia (Sue Milne)

1 Constitutional cases: October 2022

1 Parliament of the Commonwealth, impose taxation on property of any kind belonging to

3-6-2024 Page 32 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-6-2024 Page 33 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-6-2024 Page 34 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 WATSON v_ LEE (1979) 144 CLR 374;( JUDGE3 STEPHEN J.)

3-6-2024 Page 42 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

1 These sources were consulted to provide accurate information on the distribution of

3-6-2024 Page 43 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

3-6-2024 Page 51 © Mr G. H. Schorel-Hlavka O.W.B.

41 MAY JUSTICE ALWAYS PREVAIL®

You might also like