Gape Model

Download as docx, pdf, or txt
Download as docx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 3

The GAP model

The Iigure below shows the "GAP" model oI service quality Irom Parasuraman et al. (Zithaml &
Bitner 1996). This model oIIers an integrated view oI the consumer-company relationship. It is
based on substantial research amongst a number oI service providers. In common with the
Grnroos model it shows the perception gap (Gap 5) and outlines contributory Iactors. In this
case expected service is a Iunction oI word oI mouth communication, personal need and past
experience, and perceived service is a product oI service delivery and external communications
to consumers.

O Parasuraman et al. CAP model (Zeithaml 199)
owever the GAP model goes Iurther in its analysis oI these key contributory Iactors. It not only
provides a more rigorous description oI the contributory Gaps, it lists key drivers Ior each gap
and generic breakdown oI each oI these drivers. These are illustrated below in summary Iorm
below.
Gap 1
O nadequate market research orientation
O ack of upward communication
O nsufficient relationship focus
Gap 2
O Absence of customer driven standards
O nadequate service leadership
O Poor service design
Gap 3
O Deficiencies of human resource policies
O ailure to match supply and demand
O ustomers not fulfilling roles
Gap 4
O neffective management of customer expectations
O verpromising
O nadequate horizontal communications
O ey factors in the CAP model (Zeithaml 199)
This level oI detail allows powerIul analysis oI the contributory Iactors to a perception gap at a
practical level. The model shows the importance oI marketing, business leadership quality and
# systems in the management oI the expectation gap.
Customer gap: The difference between customer expectations and perceptions - the
service quality gap.
O ap 1: The difference between what customers expected and what
management perceived about the expectation of customers.
O ap 2: The difference between management's perceptions of customer
expectations and the translation of those perceptions into service
quality specifications and designs.
O ap 3: The difference between specifications or standards of service quality
and the actual service delivered to customers.
O ap 4: The difference between the service delivered to customers and the
promise of the firm to customers about its service quality

You might also like