Scribd
Upload
17 views28 pages

Proposal Presentation

The document discusses a project proposal for seismic resistant design of reinforced concrete framed tall buildings using performance-based design approach. It covers limitations of code-based design, benefits of performance-based design, and stages in developing the methodology including literature review, theoretical background, and expected outcomes.

Uploaded by

Raju Pal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
17 views28 pages

Proposal Presentation

The document discusses a project proposal for seismic resistant design of reinforced concrete framed tall buildings using performance-based design approach. It covers limitations of code-based design, benefits of performance-based design, and stages in developing the methodology including literature review, theoretical background, and expected outcomes.

Uploaded by

Raju Pal
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 28

PROJECT PROPOSAL

on
Seismic Resistant Design of RC frame Tall
Buildings Using a Performance-Based Design
Approach
Seismic Resistant Design of RC
Group Members: framed tall buildings using a
Raju Pal (THA077BCE100)
Raman Aryal (THA077BCE101) Performance-Based Design
Sagar Pd. Sapkota (THA077BCE114)
Shree Krishna Luitel (THA077BCE124)
Approach
Simaran Lama (THA077BCE127)
Subash Lamichhane (THA077BCE129)
1

WHAT
is
SEISMIC DESIGN?

Seismic design involves designing structures such that


they are able to resist the forces generated by
earthquakes, aiming to minimize damage and ensure
RC-Tall Building safety.
2

Why need of Seismic Design


in Nepal
located in boundary between Indian and Eurasian plate
Indian plate is subducting at a rate of 3cm per year
history of earthquake in nepal
loss of property and life
3

METHODS OF DESIGN

Working 1960s-1970s Limit


Stress State
Method Ulmitate Method Performance
Strength Based
Design 1970s-till Design
1930s-1960s
4

SHORTCOMINGS OF CODE-
BASED DESIGN
Codes change every 3 to 5 years, should we upgrade our structures every 3
to 5 years to conform?

Codes intend for “Life Safety”, not damage limits or cost implications.

Not specially developed for tall buildings.

Prescriptive in nature, no explicit check on outcome.


5

WHAT IS
PBD??
Performance Based Design (PBD) is an approach in which structural
design criteria are expressed in terms of achieving a set of performance
levels. PBD advances seismic design by focusing on reaching the
specified performance goals rather than simply following code criteria.
6

MOVE TOWARDS PERFORMANCE


BASED
Prescriptive Codes Prescribed
restrict and discourage Objective Requirements
Solution
innovation.

Performance Based Alternate


Objective Requirements
approach encourages and Solution
liberates it.
7

PERFORMANCE LEVELS
8

OBJECTIVES
To learn the design process
of seismic resilient building.

To learn about the effects of


lateral loads (seismic and wind)
on tall buildings.

Comparison of Limit State Design


and Performance-Based Design
9

LIMITATIONS
01 A very tall building is not considered.

02 Non-linear dynamic analysis is not considered.


Structural components involving beams, columns,
03 foundations (pile, mat), walls, slabs, staircase,
basement wall, lift wall, shear wall etc.
10

LITERATURE REVIEW

Force-Based Limit State Method (LSM)


• Widely used in global structural design.
• Does not consider post-earthquake performance or seismic risks.
• Results in high base shear, high ductility demand, and poor post-seismic performance
11

LITERATURE REVIEW

Performance-Based Design (PBD) Principles


Focuses on meeting specific performance objectives.
Starts with end goals, uses analysis, simulation, testing.
Employs risk assessment techniques considering hazards, vulnerabilities, and
consequences.
Integrates seismic hazards and structural damage considerations into the design
phase.
12

LITERATURE REVIEW

Differences Between LSM and PBD


LSM: Capacity and demand, prescriptive codes.
PBD: Risk assessment, performance objectives, integrates design considerations and
uncertainties.
13

LITERATURE REVIEW

Research and Application of PBD


Ongoing research to develop and refine PBD theories and methodologies.
Advantages observed in studies on RC buildings (short and tall) per American design
codes.
Goel et al. (2009): PBD reduces iterative design, improves seismic performance in tall
RC frames.
Chaudhari & Dhoot (2016): PBD ensures immediate occupancy and life safety
performance in a four-storey building.
Gil-Oulbe et al. (2020): PBD improves seismic load carrying capacity and economy.
14

LITERATURE REVIEW

Benefits and Future of PBD


Ensures uniform seismic risk levels, incorporates foundation compliance and non-
standard hysteretic characteristics.
Dual code approach proposed: prescriptive for routine structures, PBD for
complex/high-value structures.
Essential for safety, economy, and innovation in high-risk structures (hospitals,
emergency facilities, high-rises).
15

LITERATURE REVIEW

PBD in Nepal
Urbanization leads to tall building development; high seismic activity necessitates
PBD.
Performance-based design for seismic resistance using IS codes.
Relevant IS guidelines for design include IS 456:2000, IS 1893-2016, IS 13920, SP-16,
SP-34, and IS 875 (Parts I-IV).
16

LITERATURE REVIEW

Conclusion
Shift from prescriptive to performance-based design is crucial in seismic engineering.
PBD offers better seismic performance and lower life-cycle costs.
Adoption of PBD for complex and mission-critical structures is imperative for safety
and innovation.
Nepal's urbanization and seismic risks highlight the need for PBD in constructing
resilient tall buildings.
17

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
18

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
19

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
20

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

Stages of Plastic Hinge Formation


21

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND

Schematic of Capacity Spectrum Method


22

THEORETICAL BACKGROUND
23

Methodology
24
Methodology
25

EXPECTED OUTCOMES

Analysis and Design of tall RC framed buildings


understanding how seismic forces affect the structure

Comparison of PBD to code based design and how it


allows for more flexible and tailored solutions

Ductile detailing provisions which are crucial for tall


buildings to withstand extreme events without failure
26

TIMELINE
Thankyou !
- Group No. 2 -

You might also like