0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views2 pages

WCEE Draft v3.1

This document discusses the dynamic response of shallow foundations on reinforced soil with rigid inclusions through a 3D numerical study. It compares the dynamic response of different foundation configurations, including those with rigid inclusions, piles, and transfer platforms. The study examines effects of inertial forces, kinematic interaction, and configurations of rigid inclusion properties.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
40 views2 pages

WCEE Draft v3.1

This document discusses the dynamic response of shallow foundations on reinforced soil with rigid inclusions through a 3D numerical study. It compares the dynamic response of different foundation configurations, including those with rigid inclusions, piles, and transfer platforms. The study examines effects of inertial forces, kinematic interaction, and configurations of rigid inclusion properties.
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

Dynamic response of shallow foundations on reinforced

soil with rigid inclusions


Yuxiang Shen, Jesús Pérez-Herreros, Fahd Cuira, Jean-François Semblat,
Sébastien Burlon

To cite this version:


Yuxiang Shen, Jesús Pérez-Herreros, Fahd Cuira, Jean-François Semblat, Sébastien Burlon. Dy-
namic response of shallow foundations on reinforced soil with rigid inclusions. 17th World Conference
on Earthquake Engineering, 17WCEE, Sep 2021, Sendai, Japan. PROCEEDINGS OF THE SEV-
ENTEENTH WORLD CONFERENCE ON EARTHQUAKE ENGINEERING JAPAN 2021. �hal-
04478322�

HAL Id: hal-04478322


https://hal.science/hal-04478322
Submitted on 26 Feb 2024

HAL is a multi-disciplinary open access L’archive ouverte pluridisciplinaire HAL, est


archive for the deposit and dissemination of sci- destinée au dépôt et à la diffusion de documents
entific research documents, whether they are pub- scientifiques de niveau recherche, publiés ou non,
lished or not. The documents may come from émanant des établissements d’enseignement et de
teaching and research institutions in France or recherche français ou étrangers, des laboratoires
abroad, or from public or private research centers. publics ou privés.
17WCEE 17th World Conference
on Earthquake Engineering

Dynamic response of shallow foundations


on reinforced soil with rigid inclusions
Y. Shen (1)(2)(3), J. Pérez-Herreros (1), F. Cuira (1), J-F. Semblat (2)(3) and S. Burlon (1)
(1) TERRASOL (SETEC group), France
(2) Ecole Nationale Supérieur de Techniques Avancées (ENSTA Paris), France
(3) Institut Polytechnique de Paris, France

Overview
Introduction
The soil reinforcement technique using rigid inclusions is a practical, economical and time
saving solution that allows the use of shallow foundations on soft soils.
The load transfer from the structure to the rigid inclusion reinforced soil is carried out via
the load transfer platform as well as by the negative shaft skin friction.
A particular aspect of the dynamic response is the fact that the piles representing the rigid
inclusions are disconnected from the supported structure. This is of obvious interest under
seismic action.
Superposition theorem and substructuring approach

• Decomposition of the SSI problem;


• Resolution by substructuring approach with a 3D model;
• Rigid inclusions modelled explicitly by beam elements;
• Nonlinear behavior of soil represented by a viscoelastic equivalent
linear model compatible with the seismic distortion level.

Impedance
Inertial effects
Dynamique functions
direct kinematic dynamic calculation response
solution interaction impedances of the structure Kinematic Kinematic
Kausel et al. 1978
effects interaction ratio

Parametric study
Reference case and soil profile Inertial effects: impedance functions
Group A

𝜋𝐵 • The results of Group A are normalized by the static stiffness of the slab foundation;
𝑎0 = 𝑓 • In the horizontal direction, the dynamic inertial response of the foundation over
𝑉𝑠
rigid inclusions is similar to the case of slab foundation with transfer platform;
Transfer
• The same conclusions are valid for all studied configurations.
Dynamic characteristic Symbol Soft soil Hard soil Bedrock Inclusions
platform

Shear Modulus (MPa) G 45 (20, 80) 320 2 500 125 12 500

υ
Group B

Poisson ratio (-) 0.45 0.45 0.45 0.35 0.2

Mass density (t/m3) ρ 2.0 2.0 2.5 2.0 2.5

Material damping ratio (-) ξ 0.05 0.05 0.05 0.05 0

Questions addressed in this work


• Group A: Comparison with shallow foundation configurations;
• Group B: Comparison with pile foundation configurations;
• The results of Group B are normalized by the static stiffness of the pile foundation;
• Group C: Comparison with different 𝒅Τ𝑳 ratio configurations • In the vertical and rotational direction, the dynamic inertial response of the
(impact of the diameter of the rigid inclusions); foundation over rigid inclusions is similar to the case of pile foundation with transfer
• Group D: Comparison with different 𝒆Τ𝑩 ratio configurations platform;
(impact of the spacing between the rigid inclusions); • The same conclusions are valid for all studied configurations.
• Group E: Comparison with different 𝑩Τ𝑳 ratio configurations Kinematic effects: kinematic interaction ratio
(impact of length of the rigid inclusions).
Group A and B

• A-01: Foundation over rigid inclusions with transfer platform;


• A-02: Shallow foundation;
• A-03: Shallow foundation with transfer platform; • The results confirm that the kinematic interaction effects have no significant
• B-01: Pile foundation; impact in the low frequency range;
• B-02: Pile foundation with transfer platform. • The same conclusions are valid for all studied configurations.

Conclusion and perspective


• The 3D numerical study demonstrates the complicated phenomenon of the characteristics and nonlinear phenomena during the earthquake;
dynamic performance of shallow foundation on rigid inclusions; • Development of macroelement to simulate the nonlinear dynamic response
• The presence of rigid inclusions influences the vertical and rotational of inclusion reinforced foundations will be developed based on the
direction of SSI stiffness in low frequency range; observations of this study;
• The presence of transfer platform influences all the directions of SSI • This present work is conducted within
stiffness throughout the studied frequency range; the framework of ASIRI+ French national
• Different configurations of rigid inclusions (diameters, spacing and lengths) research project.
have negligeable impact on the horizontal behavior of the foundation;
• Future work will consider a set of real seismic recordings with different

References
Projet national ASIRI (2013): Recommendations for the design, construction and control of rigid inclusion Gazetas G (1991): Formulas and charts for impedances of surface and embedded foundations. J
ground improvements. Presses des Ponts. Geotech Eng.;117 (9), 1363–1381.
Briançon L, Kastner R, Simon B, Dias D (2004): Etat des connaissances-Amélioration des sols par Ostadan F, Deng N (2010): SASSI2010: A system for analysis of soil-structure interaction. University of
inclusions rigides. International Symposium on Ground Improvement (ASEP-GI 2004), Paris, France. California, Berkeley, CA, USA.
Kausel E, Whitman RV, Morray JP, Elsabee F (1978): The spring method for embedded foundations. Pérez-Herreros, J. (2020): Dynamic soil-structure interaction of pile foundations: experimental and
Nuclear Engineering and design, 48 (2-3), 377-392. numerical study (Doctoral dissertation, École centrale de Nantes).

You might also like